Patent Grant
11670270
The invention(s) relates (relate) generally to capture and/or processing of vocal performances and, in particular, to techniques suitable for selectively applying vocal effects schedules to captured vocals.
The installed base of mobile phones and other portable computing devices grows in sheer number and computational power each day. Hyper-ubiquitous and deeply entrenched in the lifestyles of people around the world, they transcend nearly every cultural and economic barrier. Computationally, the mobile phones of today offer speed and storage capabilities comparable to desktop computers from less than ten years ago, rendering them surprisingly suitable for real-time sound synthesis and other musical applications. Partly as a result, some modern mobile phones, such as the iPhone® handheld digital device, available from Apple Inc., support audio and video playback quite capably.
Like traditional acoustic instruments, mobile phones can be intimate sound producing devices. However, by comparison to most traditional instruments, they are somewhat limited in acoustic bandwidth and power. Nonetheless, despite these disadvantages, mobile phones do have the advantages of ubiquity, strength in numbers, and ultramobility, making it feasible to (at least in theory) bring together artists for jam sessions, rehearsals, and even performance almost anywhere, anytime. The field of mobile music has been explored in several developing bodies of research. See generally, G. Wang, Designing Smule's iPhone Ocarina, presented at the 2009 on New Interfaces for Musical Expression, Pittsburgh (June 2009). Moreover, experience with applications such as the Ocarina™, Leaf Trombone: World Stager™, and I Am T-Pain™ applications available from Smule, Inc. for iPhone®, iPad®, iPod Touch® and other iOS® devices has shown that advanced digital acoustic techniques may be delivered in ways that provide a compelling user experience. iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch are trademarks of Apple, Inc. iOS is a trademark of Cisco Technology, Inc. used by Apple under license.
As digital acoustic researchers seek to transition their innovations to commercial applications deployable to modern handheld devices such as the iPhone® handheld and other platforms operable within the real-world constraints imposed by processor, memory and other limited computational resources thereof and/or within communications bandwidth and transmission latency constraints typical of wireless networks, significant practical challenges present. Improved techniques, functional capabilities and user experiences are desired.
It has been discovered that, despite many practical limitations imposed by mobile device platforms and application execution environments, vocal musical performances may be captured and, in some cases or embodiments, pitch-corrected and/or processed in accord with a user selectable vocal effects schedule for mixing and rendering with backing tracks in ways that create compelling user experiences. In some cases, the vocal performances of individual users are captured on mobile devices in the context of a karaoke-style presentation of lyrics in correspondence with audible renderings of a backing track. Such performances can be pitch-corrected in real-time at the mobile device (or more generally, at a portable computing device such as a mobile phone, personal digital assistant, laptop computer, notebook computer, pad-type computer or net book) in accord with pitch correction settings. Vocal effects schedules may also be selectively applied to such performances. In this way, even amateur user/performers with imperfect pitch are encouraged to take a shot at “stardom” and/or take part in a game play, social network or vocal achievement application architecture that facilitates musical collaboration on a global scale and/or, in some cases or embodiments, to initiate revenue generating in-application transactions.
In some cases or embodiments, such transactions may include purchase or license of a computer readable encoding of artist-, song-, and/or performance-characteristic vocal effects schedule that may be selectively applied to captured vocals. In some cases or embodiments, the vocal effects schedule is specific to a musical genre. In some cases or embodiments, transactions may include purchase or license of a computer readable encoding of lyrics, timing and/or pitch correction settings or plug-ins. In some cases or embodiments, transactions may include purchase of “do overs” or retakes for all or a portion of a vocal performance. In some cases or embodiments, in addition to (or in lieu of) in-application purchase-type transactions, access to computer readable encodings of vocal effects schedules, lyrics, timing, pitch correction settings and/or retakes may be earned in accord with vocal achievement (e.g., based on pitch, timing or other correspondence with a target score or other vocal performance) or based on successful traversal of game play logic.
As with vocal effects schedule transactions, social interactions mediated by an application or social network infrastructure, such as forming groups, joining groups, sharing performances, initiating an open call, etc. generate an applicable currency or credits for transactions involving “do over” or retake entitlements. In some cases, user viewing of advertising content may generate the applicable currency or credits for such transactions.
In some cases or embodiments, pitch correction settings code a particular key or scale for the vocal performance or for portions thereof. In some cases or embodiments, pitch correction settings include a score-coded melody and/or harmony sequence supplied with, or for association with, the lyrics and backing tracks. Harmony notes or chords may be coded as explicit targets or relative to the score coded melody or even actual pitches sounded by a vocalist, if desired. In some cases or embodiments, vocal effects schedules and/or pitch correction settings supplied with, or for association with, the lyrics and backing tracks may pertain to only a portion of a coordinated vocal performance (e.g., to lead vocals, backup singer vocals, a chorus or refrain, a portion of a duet or three part harmony, etc.)
In these various ways, user performances (typically those of amateur vocalists) can be significantly improved in tonal or performance quality, the user can be provided with immediate and encouraging feedback and, in some cases or embodiments, the user can emulate or take on the persona or style of a favorite artist, iconic performance or musical genre. Typically, feedback may include both the pitch-corrected vocals themselves and visual reinforcement (during vocal capture) when the user/vocalist is “hitting” the (or a) correct note. In general, “correct” notes are those notes that are consistent with a key and which correspond to a score-coded melody or harmony expected in accord with a particular point in the performance. That said, in a capella modes without an operant score and to facilitate ad-libbing off score or with certain pitch correction settings disabled, pitches sounded in a given vocal performance may be optionally corrected solely to nearest notes of a particular key or scale (e.g., C major, C minor, E flat major, etc.) In each case, vocal sounding of “correct” notes may earn a user-vocalist points (e.g., in a game play sequence) and/or credits (e.g., in an in-application transaction framework). In general, such points or credits may be applied (using transaction handling logic implemented, in part, at the handheld device) to purchase or license of additional vocal scores and lyrics, of additional artist-, song-, performance-, or musical genre-specific vocal effects schedules, or even of vocal capture “redos” for a user selectable portion of a previously captured vocal performance.
Based on the compelling and transformative nature of pitch-corrected vocals and of artist-, song-, performance-, or musical genre-specific vocal effects, user/vocalists may overcome an otherwise natural shyness or angst associated with sharing their vocal performances. Instead, even mere amateurs are encouraged to share with friends and family or to collaborate and contribute vocal performances as part of virtual “glee clubs” or “open calls.” In some implementations, these interactions are facilitated through social network- and/or eMail-mediated sharing of performances and invitations to join in a group performance. Using uploaded vocals captured at clients such as the aforementioned portable computing devices, a content server (or service) can mediate such virtual glee clubs or open calls by manipulating and mixing the uploaded vocal performances of multiple contributing vocalists. Depending on the goals and implementation of a particular system, uploads may include (i) dry vocals versions of user's captured vocal performance suitable for application (re-application) of a vocal effects schedule and/or pitch-correction, (ii) pitch-corrected vocal performances (with or without harmonies), and/or (iii) control tracks or other indications of user key, pitch correction and/or vocal effects schedule selections, etc. By including dry vocals in the upload, significant flexibility is afforded for post-processing (at a content server or service) with selectable vocal effects schedule and for mixing, cross-fading and/or pitch shifting of respective vocal contributions into appropriate score or performance template slotting or position.
Virtual glee clubs or open calls can be mediated in any of a variety of ways. For example, in some cases or embodiments, a first user's vocal performance, captured against a backing track at a portable computing device (and pitch-corrected in accord with score-coded melody and/or harmony cues for the benefit of the performing user vocalist), is supplied to other potential vocal performers via a content server or service. Typically, the captured vocal performance is supplied as dry vocals with, or in an encoding form associable with, pitch-correction and/or vocal effect schedule settings or selections. A vocal effects schedule may be selectively applied (the content server or service or, optionally at the portable computing device) to the supplied vocal performance (or portions thereof) and the result is mixed with backing instrumentals/vocals to form a second-generation backing track against which a second user's vocals may be captured.
In some cases, successive vocal contributors are geographically separated and may be unknown (at least a prion) to each other, yet the intimacy of the vocals together with the collaborative experience itself tends to minimize this physical separation. In other cases, an open call may be posted to a group of potential contributors selected by, or otherwise associable with, the initiating user-vocalist. As successive vocal performances are captured (e.g., at respective portable computing devices) and accreted as part of the virtual glee club or in response to an open call, the backing track against which respective vocals are captured may evolve to include previously captured vocals of other “members” or open call respondents. In some cases, storing or maintaining dry vocals versions of the captured vocal performances may facilitate application of changeable (or later selectable) vocal effects schedules.
Depending on the goals and implementation of a particular system, the vocal effects (EFX) schedule may include (in a computer readable media encoding) settings and/or parameters for one or more of spectral equalization, audio compression, pitch correction, stereo delay, and reverberation effects for application to one or more respective portions of the user's vocal performance. In some cases or embodiments, a vocal effects schedule may be characteristic of an artist, song or performance and may be applied to an audio encoding of the user's captured vocal performance to cause a derivative audio encoding or audible rendering to take on characteristics of the selected artist, song or performance.
It will be understood, that in the context of the present disclosure, the term vocal effects schedule is meant to encompass, in at least some cases or embodiments, an enumerated and operant set of vocal EFX to be applied to some or all of a captured (typically, dry vocals version of a) vocal performance. Thus, differing vocal effects schedules may be earned or transacted and applied to captured dry vocals to provide a “Katy Perry effect” or a “T-Pain effect.” In some cases, social interactions mediated by an application or social network infrastructure, such as forming groups, joining groups, sharing performances, initiating an open call, etc. generate an applicable currency or credits for such transactions. In some cases, user viewing of advertising content may generate the applicable currency or credits for such transactions.
In some cases, differing vocal effects schedules may be applied to a user's captured dry vocals to imbue a derivative audio encoding of audible rendering with studio or “live” performance characteristics of a particular artist or song. In at least some cases or embodiments, the term vocal effects schedule may further encompass, an enumerated set of vocal EFX that varies in temporal or template correspondence with portions of a vocal score (e.g., with distinct vocal EFX sets for pre-chorus and chorus portions of a song and/or with distinct vocal effects sets for respective portions of a duet or other multi-vocalist performance). Likewise, respective portions of a single vocal effects schedule (or for that matter, a pair of distinct vocal effects schedules) may be employed relative to respective vocal performance captures to provide appropriate and respective EFX for a vocal performance capture of a first portion of a duet performed by a first user and for a separate vocal performance capture of a second portion of a duet performed by a second user.
In some cases or embodiments, captivating visual animations and/or facilities for listener comment and ranking, as well as open call management or vocal performance accretion logic are provided in association with an audible rendering of a vocal performance (e.g., that captured at another similarly configured mobile device) mixed with backing instrumentals and/or vocals. Synthesized harmonies and/or additional vocals (e.g., vocals captured from another vocalist at still other locations and optionally pitch-shifted to harmonize with other vocals) may also be included in the mix. Geocoding of captured vocal performances (or individual contributions to a combined performance) and/or listener feedback may facilitate animations or display artifacts in ways that are suggestive of a performance or endorsement emanating from a particular geographic locale on a user manipulable globe. In this way, implementations of the described functionality can transform otherwise mundane mobile devices into social instruments that foster a unique sense of global connectivity, collaboration and community.
In some embodiments of the present invention, a method includes using a portable computing device for vocal performance capture, the portable computing device having a touch screen, a microphone interface and a communications interface. The method includes, responsive to a user selection on the touch screen, retrieving via the communications interface, a vocal score temporally synchronized with a corresponding backing track and lyrics, the vocal score encoding a sequence of target notes for at least part of a vocal performance against the backing track. At the portable computing device, the backing track is audibly rendered and corresponding portions of the lyrics are concurrently presented on a display in temporal correspondence therewith. In temporal correspondence with the backing track, a vocal performance of the user is captured via the microphone interface, and a dry vocals version of the user's captured vocal performance is stored at the portable computing device. In accord with the vocal score, the portable computing device performs continuous, real-time pitch shifting of at least some portions of the user's captured vocal performance and mixes the resulting pitch-shifted vocal performance of the user into the audible rendering of the backing track.
In some embodiments, the method further includes applying at least one vocal effects schedule to the user's captured vocal performance. The vocal effects schedule includes a computer readable encoding of settings and/or parameters for one or more of spectral equalization, audio compression, pitch correction, stereo delay, and reverberation effects, for application to one or more respective portions of the user's vocal performance. In some cases, the vocal effects schedule codes differing effects for application to respective portions of the user's vocal performance in temporal correspondence with the backing track or lyrics. In some cases, the vocal effects schedule is characteristic of a particular artist, song or performance.
In some embodiments, the method further includes transacting from the portable computing device a purchase or license of at least a portion of the vocal effects schedule. In some embodiments, the method includes, in furtherance of the transacting, retrieving via the communications interface, or unlocking a preexisting stored instance of, a computer readable encoding of the vocal effects schedule. In some embodiments, the method further computationally evaluating correspondence of at least a portion of the user's captured vocal performance with the vocal score and, based on a threshold figure of merit, awarding the user a license or access to at least a portion of the vocal effects schedule.
In some cases, the vocal effects schedule is subsequently applied to the dry vocals version of the user's captured vocal performance. In some cases, the subsequent application to the dry vocals is at the portable device and the method further includes audibly re-rendering at the portable device the user's captured vocal performance with pitch shifting and vocal effects applied. In some embodiments, the method includes transmitting to a remote service or server, via the communications interface, an audio signal encoding of the dry vocals version of the user's captured vocal performance for the subsequent application, at the remote service or server, of the vocal effects schedule.
In some embodiments, the method further includes transmitting in, or for, association with the transmitted audio signal encoding of the dry vocals, an open call indication that the user's captured vocal performance constitutes but one of plural vocal performances to be combined at the remote service or server. In some cases, the open call indication directs the remote service or server to solicit from one or more other vocalists the additional one or more vocal performances to be mixed for audible rendering with that of the user. In some cases, the solicitation is directed to (i) an enumerated set of potential other vocalists specified by the user, (ii) members of an affinity group defined or recognized by the remote service or server, or (iii) a set of social network relations of the user. In some cases, the open call indication specifies for at least one additional vocalist position, a second vocal score and second lyrics for supply to a responding additional vocalist. In some cases, the open call indication further specifies for the at least one additional vocalist position, a second vocal effects schedule for application to the vocal performance of the responding additional vocalist.
In some embodiments, the method further includes receiving from the remote service or server a version of the user's captured vocal performance processed in accordance with the vocal effects schedule and audibly re-rendering at the portable device the user's captured vocal performance with vocal effects applied.
In some cases, the vocal effects schedule is applied at the portable computing device in a rendering pipeline that includes the continuous, real-time pitch shifting such that the audible rendering includes the scheduled vocal effects.
In some embodiments, the method includes transacting from the portable computing device an entitlement to initiate vocal recapture of a user selected portion of the previously captured vocal performance. In some embodiments, the method includes computationally evaluating correspondence of at least a portion of the user's captured vocal performance with the vocal score and based on a threshold figure of merit, according the user an entitlement to initiate vocal recapture of a user selected portion of the previously captured vocal performance.
In some cases, wherein the pitch shifting is based on continuous time-domain estimation of pitch for the user's captured vocal performance. In some cases, the continuous time-domain pitch estimation includes computing, for a current block of a sampled signal corresponding to the user's captured vocal performance, a lag-domain periodogram, the lag-domain periodogram computation includes, for an analysis window of the sampled signal, evaluation of an average magnitude difference function (AMDF) or an autocorrelation function for a range of lags.
In some embodiments, the method includes, responsive to the user selection, also retrieving the backing track via the data communications interface. In some cases, the backing track resides in storage local to the portable computing device, and the retrieving identifies the vocal score temporally synchronizable with the corresponding backing track and lyrics using an identifier ascertainable from the locally stored backing track. In some cases, the backing track includes either or both of instrumentals and backing vocals and is rendered in multiple versions, wherein the version of the backing track audibly rendered in correspondence with the lyrics is a monophonic scratch version, and the version of the backing track mixed with pitch-corrected vocal versions of the user's vocal performance is a polyphonic version of higher quality or fidelity than the scratch version.
In some embodiments, the portable computing device is selected from the group of a mobile phone, a personal digital assistant, a media player or gaming device, and a laptop computer, notebook computer, tablet computer or net book. In some embodiments, the display includes the touch screen. In some embodiments, the display is wirelessly coupled to the portable computing device.
In some embodiments, the method includes geocoding the transmitted audio signal encoding of the dry vocals. In some embodiments, the method further includes receiving from the remote service or server via the communications interface an audio signal encoding that includes a second vocal performance captured at a remote device and displaying a geographic origin for the second vocal performance in correspondence with an audible rendering that includes the second vocal performance. In some cases, the display of geographic origin is by display animation suggestive of a performance emanating from a particular location on a globe.
In some embodiments in accordance with the present invention(s), a method includes (i) using a portable computing device for vocal performance capture, the portable computing device having a touch screen, a microphone interface and a communications interface; (ii) responsive to a user selection on the touch screen, retrieving via the communications interface, a vocal score temporally synchronized with a corresponding backing track and lyrics, the vocal score encoding a sequence of target notes for at least part of a vocal performance against the backing track; (iii) at the portable computing device, audibly rendering the backing track and concurrently presenting corresponding portions of the lyrics on a display in temporal correspondence therewith; (iv) capturing via the microphone interface, and in temporal correspondence with the backing track, a vocal performance of the user; and (v) transmitting to a remote service or server, via the communications interface, an audio signal encoding of a dry vocals version of the user's captured vocal performance together with a selection of at least one vocal effects schedule to be applied the user's captured vocal performance.
In some embodiments, the method further includes applying, at the remote service or server, of the selected vocal effects schedule. In some embodiments, the method further includes performing, at the portable computing device and in accord with the vocal score, continuous, real-time pitch shifting of at least some portions of the user's captured vocal performance and mixing the resulting pitch-shifted vocal performance of the user into the audible rendering of the backing track.
In some cases, the selected vocal effects schedule includes a computer readable encoding of settings and/or parameters for one or more of spectral equalization, audio compression, pitch correction, stereo delay, and reverberation effects for application to one or more respective portions of the user's vocal performance. In some cases, the vocal effects schedule is specific to a musical genre. In some cases, the vocal effects schedule is characteristic of a particular artist, song or performance.
In some embodiments, the method includes transacting from the portable computing device a purchase or license of at least a portion of the vocal effects schedule. In some embodiments, the method includes computationally evaluating correspondence of at least a portion of the user's captured vocal performance with the vocal score and, based on a threshold figure of merit, awarding the user a license or access to at least a portion of the vocal effects schedule. In some embodiments, the method includes transacting from the portable computing device an entitlement to recapture a selected portion of the vocal performance. In some embodiments, the method includes computationally evaluating correspondence of at least a portion of the user's captured vocal performance with the vocal score and based on a threshold figure of merit, according the user an entitlement to recapture a selected portion of the vocal performance.
In some embodiments in accordance with the present invention(s), a portable computing device includes a microphone interface, an audio transducer interface, a data communications interface, user interface code, pitch correction code and a rendering pipeline. The user interface code is executable on the portable computing device to capture user interface gestures selective for a backing track and to initiate retrieval of at least a vocal score corresponding thereto, the vocal score encoding a sequence of note targets for at least part of a vocal performance against the backing track. The user interface code is further executable to capture user interface gestures to initiate (i) audible rendering of the backing track, (ii) concurrent presentation of lyrics on a display (iii) capture of the user's vocal performance using the microphone interface and (iv) storage of a dry vocals version of the captured vocal performance to computer readable storage. The pitch correction code is executable on the portable computing device to, concurrent with said audible rendering, continuously and in real-time pitch correct the captured vocal performance in accord with the vocal score. The rendering pipeline executable to mix the user's pitch-corrected vocal performance into the audible rendering of the backing track against which the user's vocal performance is captured.
In some embodiments, the portable computing device includes the display. In some embodiments, the data communications interface provides a wireless interface to the display.
In some embodiments, the user interface code is further executable to capture user interface gestures indicative of a user selection of a vocal effects schedule and, responsive thereto, to transmit to a remote service or server via the data communications interface, an audio signal encoding of the dry vocals version of the user's captured vocal performance for the subsequent application, at the remote service or server, of the selected vocal effects schedule. In some cases, the transmission includes in, or for, association with the audio signal encoding of the dry vocals, an open call indication that the user's captured vocal performance constitutes but one of plural vocal performances to be combined at the remote service or server.
In some embodiments, the portable computing device includes code executable on the portable computing device evaluate correspondence of at least a portion of the user's captured vocal performance with the vocal score and based on a threshold figure of merit, to award the user a license or access to at least a portion of the vocal effects schedule. In some embodiments, the portable computing device includes code executable on the portable computing device evaluate correspondence of at least a portion of the user's captured vocal performance with the vocal score and based on a threshold figure of merit, to award the user an entitlement to recapture a selected portion of the vocal performance.
In some embodiments, the portable computing device further includes local storage, wherein the initiated retrieval includes checking instances, if any, of the vocal score information in the local storage against instances available from a remote server and retrieving from the remote server if instances in local storage are unavailable or out-of-date.
In some embodiments in accordance with the present invention(s), a computer program product encoded in one or more non-transitory media, the computer program product includes instructions executable on a processor of the portable computing device to cause the portable computing device to perform the steps one of the above-described methods.
These and other embodiments in accordance with the present invention(s) will be understood with reference to the description and appended claims which follow.
The present invention is illustrated by way of example and not limitation with reference to the accompanying figures, in which like references generally indicate similar elements or features.
Skilled artisans will appreciate that elements or features in the figures are illustrated for simplicity and clarity and have not necessarily been drawn to scale. For example, the dimensions or prominence of some of the illustrated elements or features may be exaggerated relative to other elements or features in an effort to help to improve understanding of embodiments of the present invention.
Techniques have been developed to facilitate the capture, pitch correction, harmonization, vocal effects (EFX) processing, encoding and audible rendering of vocal performances on handheld or other portable computing devices. Building on these techniques, mixes that include such vocal performances can be prepared for audible rendering on targets that include these handheld or portable computing devices as well as desktops, workstations, gaming stations and even telephony targets. Implementations of the described techniques employ signal processing techniques and allocations of system functionality that are suitable given the generally limited capabilities of such handheld or portable computing devices and that facilitate efficient encoding and communication of the pitch-corrected vocal performances (or precursors or derivatives thereof) via wireless and/or wired bandwidth-limited networks for rendering on portable computing devices or other targets.
Pitch detection and correction of a user's vocal performance are performed continuously and in real-time with respect to the audible rendering of the backing track at the handheld or portable computing device. In this way, pitch-corrected vocals may be mixed with the audible rendering to overlay (in real-time) the very instrumentals and/or vocals of the backing track against which the user's vocal performance is captured. In some implementations, pitch detection builds on time-domain pitch correction techniques that employ average magnitude difference function (AMDF) or autocorrelation-based techniques together with zero-crossing and/or peak picking techniques to identify differences between pitch of a captured vocal signal and score-coded target pitches. Based on detected differences, pitch correction based on pitch synchronous overlapped add (PSOLA) and/or linear predictive coding (LPC) techniques allow captured vocals to be pitch shifted in real-time to “correct” notes in accord with pitch correction settings that code score-coded melody targets and harmonies. Frequency domain techniques, such as FFT peak picking for pitch detection and phase vocoding for pitch shifting, may be used in some implementations, particularly when off-line processing is employed or computational facilities are substantially in excess of those typical of current generation mobile devices. Pitch detection and shifting (e.g., for pitch correction, harmonies and/or preparation of composite multi-vocalist, virtual glee club mixes) may also be performed in a post-processing mode.
In general, “correct” notes are those notes that are consistent with a specified key or scale or which, in some embodiments, correspond to a score-coded melody (or harmony) expected in accord with a particular point in the performance. That said, in a capella modes without an operant score (or that allow a user to, during vocal capture, dynamically vary pitch correction settings of an existing score) may be provided in some implementations to facilitate ad-libbing. For example, user interface gestures captured at the mobile phone (or other portable computing device) may, for particular lyrics, allow the user to (i) switch off (and on) use of score-coded note targets, (ii) dynamically switch back and forth between melody and harmony note sets as operant pitch correction settings and/or (iii) selectively fall back (at gesture selected points in the vocal capture) to settings that cause sounded pitches to be corrected solely to nearest notes of a particular key or scale (e.g., C major, C minor, E flat major, etc.) In short, user interface gesture capture and dynamically variable pitch correction settings can provide a Freestyle mode for advanced users.
In some cases, pitch correction settings may be selected to distort the captured vocal performance in accord with a desired effect, such as with pitch correction effects popularized by a particular musical performance or particular artist. In some embodiments, pitch correction may be based on techniques that computationally simplify autocorrelation calculations as applied to a variable window of samples from a captured vocal signal, such as with plug-in implementations of Auto-Tune® technology popularized by, and available from, Antares Audio Technologies.
Depending on the goals and implementation of a particular system, a user selectable vocal effects (EFX) schedule may include (in a computer readable media encoding) settings and/or parameters for one or more of spectral equalization, audio compression, pitch correction, stereo delay, and reverberation effects for application to one or more respective portions of the user's vocal performance. In some cases or embodiments, a vocal effects schedule may be characteristic of an artist, song or performance and may be applied to an audio encoding of the user's captured vocal performance to cause a derivative audio encoding or audible rendering to take on characteristics of the selected artist, song or performance.
Thus, one vocal effects schedule may, for example, be characteristic of a studio recording of lead vocals by the artist, Michael Jackson, performing “P.Y.T. (Pretty Young Thing),” while another may be characteristic of a cover version of the same song by the artist, T-Pain. In such case, a first vocal effects schedule (corresponding to the original performance by Michael Jackson) may encode in computer readable form EFX that (using in terminology often employed by studio engineers) includes bass roll-off, moderate compression, and digital plate reverb. More specifically, the first vocal effects schedule may encode parameters or settings of a 12 dB/octave high pass filter at 120 Hz, a tube compressor with 4:1 ratio and threshold of −10 dB, and a digital reverberator with warm plate setting, 30 ms pre-delay and 15% wet/dry mix. In contrast, a second vocal effects schedule (corresponding to the cover versions by T-Pain) may encode in computer readable form EFX that (again using in terminology often employed by studio engineers) includes high-pass equalization, pop compression, fast pitch correction, vocal doubling on some words, light reverb for “airiness.” More specifically, the second vocal effects schedule may encode parameters or settings for a 24 dB/octave high pass filter at 200 Hz, digital compression with 4:1 ratio and threshold of −15 dB, pitch correction with 0 ms attack, stereo chorus, with a rate of 0.3 Hz, an intensity of 100% and mix of 100% (to emulate words that are doubled such as “pretty young thing” at particular score coded positions) and impulse-response-based reverb, for a concert hall with high-pass filtering at 300 Hz, length of 2.5 seconds, and 10% wet/dry mix.
Likewise, in some cases or embodiments, a vocal effects schedule may be characteristic of a particular musical genre. For example, one vocal effects schedule may be characteristic of a dance genre (e.g., encoding parameters or settings of a 24 dB/octave high pass filter at 250 Hz, a digital compressor with 6:1 ratio and threshold of −15 dB, a stereo delay with left channel [200 ms delay, 15% wet/dry mix, 40% feedback coefficient] and right channel [260 ms delay, 15% wet/dry mix, 40% feedback coefficient], and a digital reverberator with bright plate setting and 15% wet/dry mix), while another may be characteristic of a ballad genre (e.g., encoding parameters or settings of a 12 dB/octave high pass filter at 120 Hz, a digital compressor with 4:1 ratio and threshold of −8 dB, and a digital reverberator with large concert hall setting, 30 ms pre-delay and 20% wet/dry mix). Although particular parameterizations of musical genre-specific vocal effects schedules are, in general, implementation specific, based on the description herein, persons of skill in the art will appreciate suitable variations and other parameterizations of vocal effects schedules for these and other musical genres. Dance and ballad genres are merely illustrative.
It will be understood, that in the context of the present disclosure, the term vocal effects schedule is meant to encompass, in at least some cases or embodiments, an enumerated and operant set of vocal EFX to be applied to some or all of a captured (typically, dry vocals version of a) vocal performance. Thus, differing vocal effects schedules may be transacted and applied to captured dry vocals to provide a “Katy Perry effect” or a “T-Pain effect.” Likewise, differing vocal effects schedules may be transacted and applied to captured dry vocals to imbue a derivative audio encoding or audible rendering with a musical genre-specific effect. In some cases, differing vocal effects schedules may be transacted and alternatively applied to a user's captured dry vocals to imbue a derivative audio encoding or audible rendering with studio or “live” performance characteristics. While, artist-, song- or performance-specific vocal EFX schedules are described separately from musical genre-specific vocal EFX schedules, it will be appreciated, that in some cases or embodiments, a particular vocal EFX schedule may conflate artist-, song-, performance-, and/or musical genre-specific aspects.
In at least some cases or embodiments, the term vocal effects schedule may further encompass, an enumerated set of vocal EFX that varies in temporal or template correspondence with portions of a vocal score (e.g., with distinct vocal EFX sets for pre-chorus and chorus portions of a song and/or with distinct vocal effects sets for respective portions of a duet or other multi-vocalist performance). Thus, in a vocal effects schedule for Cher's iconic performance of “Believe,” certain score-aligned portions corresponding to pre-chorus sections of the performance may encode in computer readable form EFX that (using in terminology often employed by studio engineers) include spectral equalization, moderate compression, strong pitch correction, and light stereo delay, while portions corresponding to chorus sections of the performance may encode EFX that include bass roll-off, pop compression, long high-passed stereo delay, and rich/warm reverb. In more technical terms, pre-chorus section EFX in the vocal effects schedule may encode parameters or settings for a 24 dB/octave high pass filter at 400 Hz and a 12 dB/octave low pass filter at 2.2 kHz, a digital soft-knee compressor with 3:1 ratio and threshold of −10 dB, pitch correction with 0 ms attack, and a quarter-note synched delay on the left channel, offset by one eighth note on the right channel, both at 15% wet/dry mix and with feedback of 33%. In contrast, chorus section EFX in the vocal effects schedule may encode parameters or settings for a 12 dB/octave high pass filter at 120 Hz, a tube compressor with 4:1 ratio and threshold of −15 dB, half-note synced delay on the left channel, offset by 20 ms on the right channel, both at 25% wet/dry mix and with feedback of 45%, impulse-response-based reverberation characteristic of a concert hall with high-pass filtering at 200 Hz, length of 4.5 seconds and a 18% wet/dry mix.
Likewise, respective portions of a single vocal effects schedule (or for that matter, a pair of distinct vocal effects schedules) may be employed relative to respective vocal performance captures to provide appropriate and respective EFX for a vocal performance capture of a first portion of a duet performed by a first user and for a separate vocal performance capture of a second portion of a duet performed by a second user.
Based on the compelling and transformative nature of the pitch-corrected vocals and selectable vocal effects (EFX), user/vocalists typically overcome an otherwise natural shyness or angst associated with sharing their vocal performances. Instead, even mere amateurs are encouraged to share with friends and family or to collaborate and contribute vocal performances as part of an affinity group. In some implementations, these interactions are facilitated through social network- and/or eMail-mediated sharing of performances and invitations to join in a group performance or virtual glee club. Using uploaded vocals captured at clients such as the aforementioned portable computing devices, a content server (or service) can mediate such affinity groups by manipulating and mixing the uploaded vocal performances of multiple contributing vocalists. Depending on the goals and implementation of a particular system, uploads may include pitch-corrected vocal performances, dry (i.e., uncorrected) vocals, and/or control tracks of user key and/or pitch correction selections, etc.
Often, first and second encodings (often of differing quality or fidelity) of the same underlying audio source material may be employed. For example, use of first and second encodings of a backing track (e.g., one at the handheld or other portable computing device at which vocals are captured, and one at the content server) can allow the respective encodings to be adapted to data transfer bandwidth constraints or to needs at the particular device/platform at which they are employed. In some embodiments, a first encoding of the backing track audibly rendered at a handheld or other portable computing device as an audio backdrop to vocal capture may be of lesser quality or fidelity than a second encoding of that same backing track used at the content server to prepare the mixed performance for audible rendering. In this way, high quality mixed audio content may be provided while limiting data bandwidth requirements to a handheld device used for capture and pitch correction of a vocal performance.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, backing track encodings employed at the portable computing device may, in some cases, be of equivalent or even better quality/fidelity those at the content server. For example, in embodiments or situations in which a suitable encoding of the backing track already exists at the mobile phone (or other portable computing device), such as from a music library resident thereon or based on prior download from the content server, download data bandwidth requirements may be quite low. Lyrics, timing information and applicable pitch correction settings may be retrieved for association with the existing backing track using any of a variety of identifiers ascertainable, e.g., from audio metadata, track title, an associated thumbnail or even fingerprinting techniques applied to the audio, if desired.
Karaoke-Style Vocal Performance Capture
Although embodiments of the present invention are not necessarily limited thereto, mobile phone-hosted, pitch-corrected, karaoke-style, vocal capture provides a useful descriptive context. For example, in some embodiments such as illustrated in
User vocals 103 are captured at handheld 101, pitch-corrected continuously and in real-time (again at the handheld) and audibly rendered (see 104, mixed with the backing track) to provide the user with an improved tonal quality rendition of his/her own vocal performance. Pitch correction is typically based on score-coded note sets or cues (e.g., pitch and harmony cues 105), which provide continuous pitch-correction algorithms with performance synchronized sequences of target notes in a current key or scale. In addition to performance synchronized melody targets, score-coded harmony note sequences (or sets) provide pitch-shifting algorithms with additional targets (typically coded as offsets relative to a lead melody note track and typically scored only for selected portions thereof) for pitch-shifting to harmony versions of the user's own captured vocals. In some cases, pitch correction settings may be characteristic of a particular artist such as the artist that performed vocals associated with the particular backing track.
In the illustrated embodiment, backing audio (here, one or more instrumental and/or vocal tracks), lyrics and timing information and pitch/harmony cues are all supplied (or demand updated) from one or more content servers or hosted service platforms (here, content server 110). For a given song and performance, such as “Hot N Cold,” several versions of the background track may be stored, e.g., on the content server. For example, in some implementations or deployments, versions may include:
Thus, if an aspiring vocalist selects on the handheld device “Hot N Cold” as originally popularized by the artist Katy Perry, HotNCold. json and HotNCold.m4a may be downloaded from the content server (if not already available or cached based on prior download) and, in turn, used to provide background music, synchronized lyrics and, in some situations or embodiments, score-coded note tracks for continuous, real-time pitch-correction shifts while the user sings. Optionally, at least for certain embodiments or genres, harmony note tracks may be score coded for harmony shifts to captured vocals. Typically, a captured pitch-corrected (possibly harmonized) vocal performance is saved locally on the handheld device as one or more wav files and is subsequently compressed (e.g., using lossless Apple Lossless Encoder, ALE, or lossy Advanced Audio Coding, AAC, or vorbis codec) and encoded for upload (106) to content server 110 as an MPEG-4 audio, m4a, or ogg container file. MPEG-4 is an international standard for the coded representation and transmission of digital multimedia content for the Internet, mobile networks and advanced broadcast applications. OGG is an open standard container format often used in association with the vorbis audio format specification and codec for lossy audio compression. Other suitable codecs, compression techniques, coding formats and/or containers may be employed if desired.
Depending on the implementation, encodings of dry vocal and/or pitch-corrected vocals may be uploaded (106) to content server 110. In general, such vocals (encoded, e.g., as way, m4a, ogg/vorbis content or otherwise) whether already pitch-corrected or pitch-corrected at content server 110 can then be mixed (111), e.g., with backing audio and other captured (and possibly pitch shifted) vocal performances, to produce files or streams of quality or coding characteristics selected accord with capabilities or limitations a particular target (e.g., handheld 120) or network. For example, pitch-corrected vocals can be mixed with both the stereo and mono wav files to produce streams of differing quality. In some cases, a high quality stereo version can be produced for web playback and a lower quality mono version for streaming to devices such as the handheld device itself.
As described elsewhere in herein, performances of multiple vocalists may be accreted in response to an open call. In some embodiments, one set of vocals (for example, in the illustration of
Score-Coded Pitch Shifts and Vocal Effects Schedules
As will be apparent to persons of ordinary skill in the art, it is generally desirable to limit feedback loops from transducer(s) 202 to microphone 201 (e.g., through the use of head- or earphones). Indeed, while much of the illustrative description herein builds upon features and capabilities that are familiar in mobile phone contexts and, in particular, relative to the Apple iPhone handheld, even portable computing devices without a built-in microphone capabilities may act as a platform for vocal capture with continuous, real-time pitch correction and harmonization if headphone/microphone jacks are provided. The Apple iPod Touch handheld and the Apple iPad tablet are two such examples.
Both pitch correction (to main or harmony pitches) and optionally added harmonies are chosen to correspond to a score 207, which in the illustrated configuration, is wirelessly communicated (261) to the device (e.g., from content server 110 to an iPhone handheld 101 or other portable computing device, recall
In some embodiments of techniques described herein, we determine from our score the note (in a current scale or key) that is closest to that sounded by the user/vocalist. While this closest note may typically be a main pitch corresponding to the score-coded vocal melody, it need not be. Indeed, in some cases, the user/vocalist may intend to sing harmony and sounded notes may more closely approximate a harmony track. In either case, pitch corrector 252 and/or harmony generator 255 may synthesize the other portions of the desired score-coded chord by generating appropriate pitch-shifted versions of the captured vocals (even if user/vocalist is intentionally singing a harmony). A dry vocals version of the user's captured vocal performance and, optionally, one or more of the resulting pitch-shifted versions combined (254) or aggregated for mix (253) with the audibly-rendered backing track may be wirelessly communicated (262) to content server 110 or a remote device (e.g., handheld 120).
Although content server 100 side application of vocal effects has been described, it will be appreciated that user selectable vocal effects (EFX) schedules may likewise be applied in signal processing flows 250 implemented at a portable computing device (e.g., 101, 120). As before, a selected vocal effects (EFX) schedule, which in the present case may be encoded and included in wireless transmission 261, includes settings and/or parameters for one or more of spectral equalization, audio compression, pitch correction, stereo delay, and reverberation effects for application to one or more respective portions of the user's captured vocal performance. In the illustrated configuration, an optional signal processing flow is provided for an audio signal encoding of dry vocals stored in local storage and the mixed (253) with a previously described backing track for audible rendering using acoustic transducer 202. Typically, application of a user selected vocal effects (EFX) schedule at the portable computing device is a post-processing application although, depending on the nature and computational of complexity of EFX selected, real-time continuous procession (including score coded pitch correction) may be provided in some embodiments.
Although persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that any of a variety of score-coding frameworks may be employed, exemplary implementations described herein build on extensions to widely-used and standardized musical instrument digital interface (MIDI) data formats. Building on that framework, scores may be coded as a set of tracks represented in a MIDI file, data structure or container including, in some implementations or deployments:
Building on the forgoing, significant score-coded specializations can be defined to establish run-time behaviors of pitch corrector 252 and/or harmony generator 255 and thereby provide a user experience and pitch-corrected vocals that (for a wide range of vocal skill levels) exceed that achievable with conventional static harmonies.
Turning specifically to control track features, in some embodiments, the following text markers may be supported:
Chord track events, in some embodiments, include the following text markers that notate a root and quality (e.g., c min? or Ab maj) and allow a note set to be defined. Although desired harmonies are set in the harmony track(s), if the user's pitch differs from the scored pitch, relative offsets may be maintained by proximity to notes that are in the current chord. As used relative to a chord track of the score, the term “chord” will be understood to mean a set of available pitches, since chord track events need not encode standard chords in the usual sense. These and other score-coded pitch correction settings may be employed furtherance of the inventive techniques described herein.
Computational Techniques for Pitch Detection, Correction and Shifts
As will be appreciated by persons of ordinary skill in the art having benefit of the present description, pitch-detection and correction techniques may be employed both for correction of a captured vocal signal to a target pitch or note and for generation of harmonies as pitch-shifted variants of a captured vocal signal.
Based on the description herein, persons of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate suitable allocations of signal processing techniques (sampling, filtering, decimation, etc.) and data representations to functional blocks (e.g., decoder(s) 352, digital-to-analog (D/A) converter 351, capture 253 and encoder 355) of a software executable to provide signal processing flows 350 illustrated in
Building then on any of a variety of suitable implementations of the forgoing signal processing constructs, we turn to pitch detection and correction/shifting techniques that may be employed in the various embodiments described herein, including in furtherance of the pitch correction, harmony generation and combined pitch correction/harmonization blocks (252, 255 and 354) illustrated in
As will be appreciated by persons of ordinary skill in the art, pitch-detection and pitch-correction have a rich technological history in the music and voice coding arts. Indeed, a wide variety of feature picking, time-domain and even frequency-domain techniques have been employed in the art and may be employed in some embodiments in accord with the present invention. The present description does not seek to exhaustively inventory the wide variety of signal processing techniques that may be suitable in various design or implementations in accord with the present description; rather, we summarize certain techniques that have proved workable in implementations (such as mobile device applications) that contend with CPU-limited computational platforms.
Accordingly, in view of the above and without limitation, certain exemplary embodiments operate as follows:
As will be appreciated by persons of skill in the art, AMDF calculations are but one time-domain computational technique suitable for measuring periodicity of a signal. More generally, the term lag-domain periodogram describes a function that takes as input, a time-domain function or series of discrete time samples x(n) of a signal, and compares that function or signal to itself at a series of delays (i.e., in the lag-domain) to measure periodicity of the original function x. This is done at lags of interest. Therefore, relative to the techniques described herein, examples of suitable lag-domain periodogram computations for pitch detection include subtracting, for a current block, the captured vocal input signal x(n) from a lagged version of same (a difference function), or taking the absolute value of that subtraction (AMDF), or multiplying the signal by its delayed version and summing the values (autocorrelation).
AMDF will show valleys at periods that correspond to frequency components of the input signal, while autocorrelation will show peaks. If the signal is non-periodic (e.g., noise), periodograms will show no clear peaks or valleys, except at the zero lag position. Mathematically,
AMDF(k)=Σn|x(n)−x(n−k)|
autocorrelation(k)=Σnx(n)*x(n−k).
For implementations described herein, AMDF-based lag-domain periodogram calculations can be efficiently performed even using computational facilities of current-generation mobile devices. Nonetheless, based on the description herein, persons of skill in the art will appreciate implementations that build any of a variety of pitch detection techniques that may now, or in the future become, computational tractable on a given target device or platform.
Accretion of Vocal Performances in Response to an “Open Call”
Once a vocal performance is captured at the handheld device, the captured vocal performance audio (typically dry vocals, but optionally pitch corrected) is compressed using an audio codec (e.g., an Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) or ogg/vorbis codec) and uploaded to a content server.
In general, the resulting master may, in turn, be encoded using an appropriate codec (e.g., an AAC codec) at various bit rates and/or with selected vocals afforded prominence to produce compressed audio files which are suitable for streaming back to the capturing handheld device (and/or other remote devices) and for streaming/playback via the web. In general, relative to capabilities of commonly deployed wireless networks, it can be desirable from an audio data bandwidth perspective to limit the uploaded data to that necessary to represent the vocal performance, while mixing when and where needed. In some cases, data streamed for playback or for use as a second (or Nth) generation backing track may separately encode vocal tracks for mix with a first generation backing track at an audible rendering target. In general, vocal and/or backing track audio exchange between the handheld device and content server may be adapted to the quality and capabilities of an available data communications channel.
Relative to certain social network constructs that, in some embodiments of the present invention, facilitate open call handling, additional or alternative mixes may be desirable. For example, in some embodiments, an accretion of pitch-corrected, EFX applied vocals captured from an initial, or prior, contributor may form the basis of a backing track used in a subsequent vocal capture from another user/vocalist (e.g., at another handheld device). Accordingly, where supply and use of backing tracks is illustrated and described herein, it will be understood, that vocals captured, pitch-corrected, EFX applied (and possibly, though not typically, harmonized) may themselves be mixed to produce a “backing track” used to motivate, guide or frame subsequent vocal capture.
In general, additional vocalists may be invited to sing a particular part (e.g., tenor, part B in duet, etc.) or simply to sign, whereupon content server 110 may pitch shift and place their captured vocals into one or more positions within an open call or virtual glee club. Typically, the user-vocalist who initiated an open call selects the slots or positions (characterized temporally or by performance template/blueprint, by applicable pitch cues and/or applied EFX) into which subsequently accreted vocal performances are slotted or placed. Although mixed vocals may be included in such a backing track, it will be understood that because the illustrated and described systems separately capture and apply vocal effects schedules and pitch-correct individual vocal performances, the content server (e.g., content server 110) is in position to manipulate (112) mixes in ways that further objectives of a virtual glee club or accommodate sensibilities of the user vocalist who initiates an open call.
For example, in some embodiments of the present invention, alternative mixes of three different contributing vocalists may be presented in a variety of ways. Mixes provided to (or for) a first contributor may feature that first contributor's vocals more prominently than those of the other two (e.g., as lead vocals with appropriate pitch correction to main melody and with an artist-, song-, performance- or musical genre-specific vocal effects (EFX) schedule applied). In general, content server 110 may alter the mixes to make one vocal performance more prominent than others by manipulating pitch corrections and EFX applied to the various captured vocals therein.
World Stage
Although much of the description herein has focused on vocal performance capture, pitch correction and use of respective first and second encodings of a backing track relative to capture and mix of a user's own vocal performances, it will be understood that facilities for audible rendering of remotely captured performances of others may be provided in some situations or embodiments. In such situations or embodiments, vocal performance capture occurs at another device and after a corresponding encoding of the captured (and typically pitch-corrected) vocal performance is received at a present device, it is audibly rendered in association with a visual display animation suggestive of the vocal performance emanating from a particular location on a globe.
When a user executes the handheld application and accesses this play (or listener) mode, a world stage is presented. More specifically, a network connection is made to content server 110 reporting the handheld's current network connectivity status and playback preference (e.g., random global, top loved, my performances, etc.). Based on these parameters, content server 110 selects a performance (e.g., a pitch-corrected, EFX applied vocal performance such as may have been initially captured at handheld device instance 101 or 301 and transmits metadata associated therewith. In some implementations, the metadata includes a uniform resource locator (URL) that allows handheld 120 to retrieve the actual audio stream (high quality or low quality depending on the size of the pipe), as well as additional information such as geocoded (using GPS) location of the vocal performance capture (including geocodes for additional vocal performances included as harmonies or backup vocals) and attributes of other listeners who have loved, tagged or left comments for the particular performance. In some embodiments, listener feedback is itself geocoded. During playback, the user may tag the performance and leave his own feedback or comments for a subsequent listener and/or for the original vocal performer. Once a performance is tagged, a relationship may be established between the performer and the listener. In some cases, the listener may be allowed to filter for additional performances by the same performer and the server is also able to more intelligently provide “random” new performances for the user to listen to based on an evaluation of user preferences.
Although not specifically illustrated in the snapshot, it will be appreciated that geocoded listener feedback indications are, or may optionally be, presented on the globe (e.g., as stars or “thumbs up” or the like) at positions to suggest, consistent with the geocoded metadata, respective geographic locations from which the corresponding listener feedback was transmitted. It will be further appreciated that, in some embodiments, the visual display animation is interactive and subject to viewpoint manipulation in correspondence with user interface gestures captured at a touch screen display of handheld 120. For example, in some embodiments, travel of a finger or stylus across a displayed image of the globe in the visual display animation causes the globe to rotate around an axis generally orthogonal to the direction of finger or stylus travel. Both the visual display animation suggestive of the vocal performance emanating from a particular location on a globe and the listener feedback indications are presented in such an interactive, rotating globe user interface presentation at positions consistent with their respective geotags.
An Exemplary Mobile Device
Summarizing briefly, mobile device 400 includes a display 402 that can be sensitive to haptic and/or tactile contact with a user. Touch-sensitive display 402 can support multi-touch features, processing multiple simultaneous touch points, including processing data related to the pressure, degree and/or position of each touch point. Such processing facilitates gestures and interactions with multiple fingers, chording, and other interactions. Of course, other touch-sensitive display technologies can also be used, e.g., a display in which contact is made using a stylus or other pointing device.
Typically, mobile device 400 presents a graphical user interface on the touch-sensitive display 402, providing the user access to various system objects and for conveying information. In some implementations, the graphical user interface can include one or more display objects 404, 406. In the example shown, the display objects 404, 406, are graphic representations of system objects. Examples of system objects include device functions, applications, windows, files, alerts, events, or other identifiable system objects. In some embodiments of the present invention, applications, when executed, provide at least some of the digital acoustic functionality described herein.
Typically, the mobile device 400 supports network connectivity including, for example, both mobile radio and wireless internetworking functionality to enable the user to travel with the mobile device 400 and its associated network-enabled functions. In some cases, the mobile device 400 can interact with other devices in the vicinity (e.g., via Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc.). For example, mobile device 400 can be configured to interact with peers or a base station for one or more devices. As such, mobile device 400 may grant or deny network access to other wireless devices.
Mobile device 400 includes a variety of input/output (I/O) devices, sensors and transducers. For example, a speaker 460 and a microphone 462 are typically included to facilitate audio, such as the capture of vocal performances and audible rendering of backing tracks and mixed pitch-corrected vocal performances as described elsewhere herein. In some embodiments of the present invention, speaker 460 and microphone 662 may provide appropriate transducers for techniques described herein. An external speaker port 464 can be included to facilitate hands-free voice functionalities, such as speaker phone functions. An audio jack 466 can also be included for use of headphones and/or a microphone. In some embodiments, an external speaker and/or microphone may be used as a transducer for the techniques described herein.
Other sensors can also be used or provided. A proximity sensor 468 can be included to facilitate the detection of user positioning of mobile device 400. In some implementations, an ambient light sensor 470 can be utilized to facilitate adjusting brightness of the touch-sensitive display 402. An accelerometer 472 can be utilized to detect movement of mobile device 400, as indicated by the directional arrow 474. Accordingly, display objects and/or media can be presented according to a detected orientation, e.g., portrait or landscape. In some implementations, mobile device 400 may include circuitry and sensors for supporting a location determining capability, such as that provided by the global positioning system (GPS) or other positioning systems (e.g., systems using Wi-Fi access points, television signals, cellular grids, Uniform Resource Locators (URLs)) to facilitate geocodings described herein. Mobile device 400 can also include a camera lens and sensor 480. In some implementations, the camera lens and sensor 480 can be located on the back surface of the mobile device 400. The camera can capture still images and/or video for association with captured pitch-corrected vocals.
Mobile device 400 can also include one or more wireless communication subsystems, such as an 802.11 b/g communication device, and/or a Bluetooth™ communication device 488. Other communication protocols can also be supported, including other 802.x communication protocols (e.g., WiMax, Wi-Fi, 3G), code division multiple access (CDMA), global system for mobile communications (GSM), Enhanced Data GSM Environment (EDGE), etc. A port device 490, e.g., a Universal Serial Bus (USB) port, or a docking port, or some other wired port connection, can be included and used to establish a wired connection to other computing devices, such as other communication devices 400, network access devices, a personal computer, a printer, or other processing devices capable of receiving and/or transmitting data. Port device 490 may also allow mobile device 400 to synchronize with a host device using one or more protocols, such as, for example, the TCP/IP, HTTP, UDP and any other known protocol.
Other Embodiments
While the invention(s) is (are) described with reference to various embodiments, it will be understood that these embodiments are illustrative and that the scope of the invention(s) is not limited to them. Many variations, modifications, additions, and improvements are possible. For example, while pitch correction vocal performances captured in accord with a karaoke-style interface have been described, other variations will be appreciated. Furthermore, while certain illustrative signal processing techniques have been described in the context of certain illustrative applications, persons of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that it is straightforward to modify the described techniques to accommodate other suitable signal processing techniques and effects.
Embodiments in accordance with the present invention may take the form of, and/or be provided as, a computer program product encoded in a machine-readable medium as instruction sequences and other functional constructs of software, which may in turn be executed in a computational system (such as a iPhone handheld, mobile or portable computing device, or content server platform) to perform methods described herein. In general, a machine readable medium can include tangible articles that encode information in a form (e.g., as applications, source or object code, functionally descriptive information, etc.) readable by a machine (e.g., a computer, computational facilities of a mobile device or portable computing device, etc.) as well as tangible storage incident to transmission of the information. A machine-readable medium may include, but is not limited to, magnetic storage medium (e.g., disks and/or tape storage); optical storage medium (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD, etc.); magneto-optical storage medium; read only memory (ROM); random access memory (RAM); erasable programmable memory (e.g., EPROM and EEPROM); flash memory; or other types of medium suitable for storing electronic instructions, operation sequences, functionally descriptive information encodings, etc.
In general, plural instances may be provided for components, operations or structures described herein as a single instance. Boundaries between various components, operations and data stores are somewhat arbitrary, and particular operations are illustrated in the context of specific illustrative configurations. Other allocations of functionality are envisioned and may fall within the scope of the invention(s). In general, structures and functionality presented as separate components in the exemplary configurations may be implemented as a combined structure or component. Similarly, structures and functionality presented as a single component may be implemented as separate components. These and other variations, modifications, additions, and improvements may fall within the scope of the invention(s).
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/296,391 filed Mar. 8, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/463,878 filed Mar. 20, 2017 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/960,564 filed Aug. 6, 2013 which claims priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/680,652, filed Aug. 7, 2012 and is a continuation-in-part of commonly-owned, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/085,414, filed Apr. 12, 2011, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,983,829 issued Mar. 17, 2015 entitled “COORDINATING AND MIXING VOCALS CAPTURED FROM GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED PERFORMERS” and naming Cook, Lazier, Lieber and Kirk as inventors, which in turn claims priority of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/323,348, filed Apr. 12, 2010. Each of the aforementioned applications is incorporated by reference herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4688464 | Gibson et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
| 5231671 | Gibson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5301259 | Gibson et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5477003 | Muraki et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
| 5587547 | Nakai et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5621182 | Matsumoto | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5641927 | Pawate et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5719346 | Yoshida et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5739452 | Nagata | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5753845 | Nagata et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5773744 | Nagata | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5811708 | Matsumoto | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5889223 | Matsumoto | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5902950 | Kato et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5902951 | Kondo et al. | May 1999 | A |
| 5939654 | Anada | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5966687 | Ojard | Oct 1999 | A |
| 5974154 | Nagata et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| 6121531 | Kato | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6307140 | Iwamoto | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6336092 | Gibson et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
| 6353174 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6369311 | Iwamoto | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 7096080 | Asada et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
| 7129408 | Uehara | Oct 2006 | B2 |
| 7297858 | Paepcke | Nov 2007 | B2 |
| 7853342 | Redmann | Dec 2010 | B2 |
| 20020032728 | Sako et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
| 20020051119 | Sherman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020056117 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020091847 | Curtin | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020177994 | Chang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
| 20030055646 | Yoshioka et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030099347 | Ford et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030100965 | Sitrick et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030117531 | Rovner et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030164084 | Redmann et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20030164924 | Sherman et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
| 20040159215 | Tohgi et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
| 20040263664 | Aratani et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050120865 | Tada | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050123887 | Joung et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050182504 | Bailey | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050252362 | McHale et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050255914 | McHale et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060165240 | Bloom et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060206582 | Finn | Sep 2006 | A1 |
| 20070028750 | Darcie et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
| 20070098368 | Carley | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070150082 | Yang et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
| 20070250323 | Dimkovic et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
| 20070260690 | Coleman | Nov 2007 | A1 |
| 20070287141 | Milner | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080033585 | Zopf | Feb 2008 | A1 |
| 20080105109 | Li et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080156178 | Georges et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
| 20080190271 | Taub et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
| 20080312914 | Rajendran et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090003659 | Forstall et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20090031885 | Bennetts et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090038467 | Brennan | Feb 2009 | A1 |
| 20090106429 | Siegal et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090107320 | Willacy et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
| 20090165634 | Mahowald | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100014692 | Schreiner et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
| 20100087240 | Egozy et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20100126331 | Golovkin et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
| 20100142926 | Coleman | Jun 2010 | A1 |
| 20100192753 | Gao et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
| 20100304812 | Stoddard | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20100326256 | Emmerson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110004467 | Taub et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
| 20110126103 | Cohen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144981 | Salazar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144982 | Salazar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110144983 | Salazar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251841 | Cook et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110251842 | Cook et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120089390 | Yang et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| 20150177926 | Rivera et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
| Entry |
|---|
| Hoose, “Karaoke Revolution Glee”, [online] https://www.pluggedin.com/game-reviews/karaokerevolutionglee/, published 2010. (Year: 2010). |
| Tedeschi, “Software for Both Solos and Sing-Alongs”, New York Times, [online] “https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/08/technology/personaltech/a-review-of-apps-for-serious-vocalists-and-karaoke-fans.html” (Year: 2012). |
| “Auto-Tune: Intonation Correcting Plug-In.” User″s Manuel. Antares Audio Technologies. 2000. Print p. 1-52. |
| Ananthapadmanabha, Tirupattur V. et al. “Epoch Extraction from Linear Prediction Residual for Identification of Closed Glottis Interval.” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. ASSP-27:4. Aug. 1979. Print, p. 309-319. |
| Antarestech Company, “Auto-Tune Pitch Correcting Plug-in owners manual”, [online] www.antarestech.com, published in 2008. (Year: 2008). |
| Atal, Bishnu S. The History of Linear Prediction.: IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. vol. 154, Mar. 2006. Print, p. 154-161. |
| Baran, Tom. “Autotalent v0.2”, Digital Signal Processing Group, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, http://;web.mit.edu/tbaran/www/autotalent.html, Jan. 31, 2011. |
| Baran, Tom. “Autotalent v0.2: Pop Music in a Can” Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. May 22, 2011. Web. http://web.mit.edu/tbaran/www/autotalent.htlml. |
| Cheng, M.J. “Some Comparisons Among Several Pitch Detection Algorithms.” Bell Laboratories Murray Hill, NJ. 1976. p. 332-335. |
| Clark, Don. “MuseAmi Hopes to Take Music Automation to New Level.” The Wall Street Journals, Digits, Technology News and Insights, Mar. 19, 2010. http://blogs.wsj.eom/digits/2010/03/19/museami-hopes-to-takes-music-automation-to-new-level/CONNEALLY, TIM. “The Age of Egregious Auto-tuning: 1998-2009.” Tech Gear News-Betanews. Jun. 15, 2009. Web. http://www.betanews.com/article/the-age-of-egregious-autotuning-19982009/1245090927. |
| Gerard, David. “Pitch Extraction and Fundamental Frequency: History and Current Techniques.” Department of Computer Science, University of Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada. Nov. 2003 Print, pp. 1-22. |
| International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed in International Application No. PCT/US10/60135 dated Feb. 8, 2011, 17 pages. |
| International Search Report mailed in International Application No. PCT/US2011/032185 dated Aug. 17, 2011, 6 pages. |
| Johnson, Joel. “Glee on iPhone More than Good-It″s Fabulous.” Apr. 15, 2015. Web. http://gizmodo.com/5518067/glee-on-iphone-more-than-goodits-fabulous. pp. 1-3. |
| Johnson-Bristow, Robert. “A Detailed Analysis of a Time-Domain Formant Corrected Pitch Shifting Alogorithm” AES: An Audio Engineering Society Preprint. Oct. 1993. Print. 24 pages. |
| Kuhn, William. “A Real-Time Pitch Recognition Algorithm for Music Applications.” Computer Music Journal, vol. 14, No. 3, Fall 1990, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Print. pp. 60-71. |
| Kumparak, Greg. “Gleeks Rejoice Smule Packs Fox″s Glee into A Fantastic iPhone Application” MobileCrunch. Apr. 15, 2010. http://www.mobilecrunch.com/2010/04/15/gleeks-rejoice-smule-packs-foxs-glee-into-a-fantastic-iphone-app/. |
| Lent, Keith. “An Efficient Method for Pitch Shifting Digitally Sampled Sounds.” Departments of Music and Electrical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin. Computer Music Journal, vol. 13:4, Winter 1989, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Print, p. 65-71. |
| McGonegal, Carol A. et al. “A Semiautomatic Pitch Detector (SAPD).” Bell Laboratories. Murray Hill, NJ. May 19, 1975. Print. p. 570-574. |
| Rabiner, Lawrence R. “On the Use of Autocorrelation Analysis for Pitch Detection.” IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing. vol. ASSP-25:1, Feb. 1977. pp. 24-33. |
| Shaffer, H. and Ross, M. and Cohen, A. “AMDF Pitch Extractor.” 85th Meeting Acoustical Society of America, vol. 54:1, Apr. 13, 1973. page. 340. |
| Trueman, Daniel, et al. “PLOrk: the Princeton Laptop Orchestra, Year 1.” Music Department, Princeton University. 2009 Print 10 pages. |
| Wang, GE. “Designing Smule″s iPhone Ocarina.” Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics, Stanford University 5 pages. |
| Wortham, Jenna. “Unleash Your Inner Geek on the IPad.” Bits, The New York Times, Apr. 15, 2010. |
| Ying, Goangshiuan S. et al. “A Probabilistic Approach to AMDF Pitch Detection.” School of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Purdue University. 1996. Web. http://purcell.ecn.purdue.edu/˜speechg . Accessed Jul. 5, 2011. 5 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210248985 A1 | Aug 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 61680652 | Aug 2012 | US | |
| 61323348 | Apr 2010 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16296391 | Mar 2019 | US |
| Child | 17249113 | US | |
| Parent | 15463878 | Mar 2017 | US |
| Child | 16296391 | US | |
| Parent | 13960564 | Aug 2013 | US |
| Child | 15463878 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 13085414 | Apr 2011 | US |
| Child | 13960564 | US |
