Sodium and bicarbonate control

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11944733
  • Patent Number
    11,944,733
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, November 18, 2021
    2 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 2, 2024
    a month ago
Abstract
The disclosure relates to systems and methods for controlling the sodium and bicarbonate concentrations in a dialysate. The systems and methods can use conductivity sensors to control the addition of water and bicarbonate to accurately control the final concentrations of both sodium and bicarbonate.
Description
FIELD

Systems, components, and methods are provided for controlling the sodium and bicarbonate concentrations in a dialysate. The systems, components, and methods can use conductivity sensors to control the addition of water and bicarbonate to accurately control the final concentrations of both sodium and bicarbonate.


BACKGROUND

Sorbent-based recirculating dialysis systems often remove urea from spent dialysate by first converting the urea to carbon dioxide and ammonium ions, and then removing the ammonium ions from solution. The formation of carbon dioxide, which exists in equilibrium with bicarbonate, makes control over the bicarbonate concentration of the dialysate difficult. In a typical regenerative dialysis sorbent system sodium and bicarbonate are partially removed or generated across a sorbent cartridge, usually to unpredictable levels. Therefore, the amount of sodium and bicarbonate to add to the dialysate to achieve a desired prescription level is unpredictable and can lead to inaccurate levels.


Hence, there is a need for systems and methods for controlling the bicarbonate and sodium concentrations in the dialysate of a sorbent-based dialysis system. The need extends to systems and methods that allow for accurate control of sodium and bicarbonate without the need to directly measure and adjust the bicarbonate concentration prior to the dialysate reaching the dialyzer. There is a further need for systems and methods that can control the bicarbonate and sodium concentration throughout an entire dialysis session, even as the pH and composition of the solution leaving the sorbent cartridge changes.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The problem to be solved is controlling bicarbonate and sodium concentration in a dialysate throughout a dialysis session. The solution is to use a two-phase control, removing substantially all of the bicarbonate from solution during a first low pH phase, and then using information obtained during the first phase to control the bicarbonate and sodium concentration in a second, higher pH phase.


The first aspect relates to a system. In any embodiment, the system can include a dialysate flow path; the dialysate flow path fluidly connectable to a dialysate inlet of a dialyzer and a dialysate outlet of the dialyzer; a sorbent cartridge in the dialysate flow path; a degasser in the dialysate flow path downstream of the sorbent cartridge; a bicarbonate source fluidly connected to the dialysate flow path; a water source fluidly connected to the dialysate flow path; a first conductivity sensor downstream of the sorbent cartridge; and a control system; the control system programmed to determine a pH of a fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge; wherein: while pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is below a preset pH, the control system is programmed to control a sodium concentration in the fluid based on a sodium prescription and a conductivity measured by the first conductivity sensor; and to control a bicarbonate concentration in the fluid based on a bicarbonate prescription.


In any embodiment, the preset pH can be about 4.8.


In any embodiment, the sorbent cartridge can include zirconium phosphate at a low pH.


In any embodiment, while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is below the preset pH, the control system can be programmed to control the sodium concentration in the fluid by adding water from a water source upstream of the sorbent cartridge to a target post-sorbent conductivity setpoint.


In any embodiment, while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is below the preset pH, the control system can be programmed to control the bicarbonate concentration in the fluid by adding bicarbonate from a bicarbonate source downstream of the sorbent cartridge to a target conductivity delta between a conductivity sensor after the sorbent cartridge and a conductivity sensor after the bicarbonate source.


In any embodiment, the system can include a hydrochloric acid source fluidly connected to the dialysate flow path upstream of the sorbent cartridge.


In any embodiment, the system can include at least one infusate source downstream of the sorbent cartridge.


In any embodiment, the control system can be programmed to detect release of sulfate ions from the sorbent cartridge.


In any embodiment, wherein the control system can be programmed to dilute the fluid during the release of sulfate ions.


In any embodiment, while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is above a preset pH, the control system can be programmed to control the sodium concentration in the fluid by adding water from a water source upstream of the sorbent cartridge to a target pre-sorbent conductivity setpoint.


In any embodiment, the pre-sorbent conductivity can be measured with a second conductivity sensor upstream of the sorbent cartridge.


In any embodiment, the target pre-sorbent conductivity setpoint can be a conductivity measured upstream of the sorbent cartridge while the pH is below the preset pH.


In any embodiment, while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is above a preset pH, the control system can be programmed to control the bicarbonate concentration in the fluid by adding bicarbonate to reach a target post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint.


In any embodiment, the target post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint can be based on the sodium and a bicarbonate prescription.


In any embodiment, the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge can be measured with a pH sensor downstream of the sorbent cartridge.


In any embodiment, the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge can be measured based on changes to a degasser output.


In any embodiment, the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge can be measured based on a conductivity change across the sorbent cartridge measured by the first conductivity sensor and a second conductivity sensor upstream of the sorbent cartridge.


In any embodiment, the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge can be measured based on a volume of the water added from the water source.


In any embodiment, the control system can be programmed to isolate the sorbent cartridge prior to determining the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge.


The features disclosed as being part of the first aspect can be in the first aspect, either alone or in combination, or follow any arrangement or permutation of any one or more of the described elements. Similarly, any features disclosed as being part of the first aspect can be in a second aspect described below, either alone or in combination, or follow any arrangement or permutation of any one or more of the described elements.


The second aspect relates to a method. In any embodiment, the method can include determining a pH of a fluid exiting a sorbent cartridge of a sorbent dialysis system; and while pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is below a preset pH, controlling a sodium concentration in the fluid based on a sodium prescription and a conductivity measured by a first conductivity sensor downstream of the sorbent cartridge; and controlling a bicarbonate concentration in the fluid based on a bicarbonate prescription.


In any embodiment, the preset pH can be about 4.8.


In any embodiment, the sorbent cartridge can include zirconium phosphate at a low pH.


In any embodiment, while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is below a preset pH, the step of controlling the sodium concentration in the fluid can include adding water from a water source upstream of the sorbent cartridge to a target post-sorbent conductivity setpoint.


In any embodiment, while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is below a preset pH, the step of controlling the bicarbonate concentration in the fluid can include adding bicarbonate from a bicarbonate source upstream of the sorbent cartridge and degasser to a target post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint.


In any embodiment, the post-bicarbonate conductivity set point can be based on a conductivity increase between fluid downstream of the degasser and upstream of the bicarbonate source and fluid downstream of the bicarbonate source.


In any embodiment, the method can include the step of adding hydrochloric acid to the dialysate flow path upstream of the sorbent cartridge.


In any embodiment, while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is above a preset pH, the method can include controlling the sodium concentration in the fluid by adding water from a water source upstream of the sorbent cartridge to a target pre-sorbent conductivity setpoint.


In any embodiment, target pre-sorbent conductivity setpoint can be a pre-sorbent conductivity measured while the pH is below the preset pH.


In any embodiment, while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is above a preset pH, the step of controlling the bicarbonate concentration in the fluid can include adding bicarbonate to reach a post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint.


In any embodiment, the post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint can be based on the sodium and a bicarbonate prescription.


The features disclosed as being part of the second aspect can be in the second aspect, either alone or in combination, or follow any arrangement or permutation of any one or more of the described elements. Similarly, any features disclosed as being part of the second aspect can be in the first aspect, either alone or in combination, or follow any arrangement or permutation of any one or more of the described elements.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a simplified drawing of a dialysis system.



FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing a method of controlling sodium and bicarbonate during a low-pH phase.



FIG. 3 is a flow chart showing a method of controlling sodium and bicarbonate during a high-pH phase.



FIG. 4 is a graph showing sorbent pH, conductivity changes, and sulfate level vs. dialysate volume for a simulated dialysis session.



FIG. 5 is a graph showing sorbent outlet pH and bicarbonate pump rate vs. dialysate volume for a simulated dialysis session.



FIG. 6 is a graph showing sorbent outlet pH and water pump rate vs. dialysate volume for a simulated dialysis session.



FIG. 7 is a graph showing sorbent outlet pH and degasser pump output vs. dialysate volume for a simulated dialysis session.



FIG. 8 is a graph showing sorbent outlet pH, dialysate sodium level, and dialysate bicarbonate level vs. dialysate volume for a simulated dialysis session





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.


The articles “a” and “an” are used to refer to one to over one (i.e., to at least one) of the grammatical object of the article. For example, “an element” means one element or over one element.


The term “adding,” to “add,” or “addition” refers to pumping additional fluid into an existing fluid or into a component or system.


The term “bicarbonate” refers to HCO3 ions, as well as any species existing in equilibrium with bicarbonate ions, including carbonate ions and carbon dioxide.


The term “bicarbonate concentration” refers to an amount of bicarbonate dissolved in a solvent per a given amount of solvent.


A “bicarbonate prescription” is an intended bicarbonate concentration in the dialysate or blood.


The term “bicarbonate source” can refer to a source of bicarbonate ions or bicarbonate predecessors. The bicarbonate can be in acid or basic form, and can include substances that react to form bicarbonate when used in a dialysis system.


The term “blood flow rate” refers to a volume of blood moving through a system per unit of time.


The term “comprising” includes, but is not limited to, whatever follows the word “comprising.” Use of the term indicates the listed elements are required or mandatory but that other elements are optional and may be present.


The term “conductivity” refers to the inverse of the electrical resistance of a fluid.


The term “conductivity change across the sorbent cartridge” refers to a difference in conductivity of a fluid prior to the fluid entering a sorbent cartridge and after the fluid exits the sorbent cartridge.


The term “conductivity increase” refers to a positive change in conductivity of a fluid as the fluid moves through a system.


The term “conductivity sensor” refers to any component capable of measuring the electrical conductance or the electrical resistance of a fluid.


The term “consisting of” includes and is limited to whatever follows the phrase “consisting of.” The phrase indicates the limited elements are required or mandatory and that no other elements may be present.


The term “consisting essentially of” includes whatever follows the term “consisting essentially of” and additional elements, structures, acts, or features that do not affect the basic operation of the apparatus, structure or method described.


The terms “control,” “controlling,” or “controls” can refer to the ability of one component to direct the actions of a second component.


A “control system” is a device which monitors and affects the operational conditions of a given system. The operational conditions are typically referred to as output variables of the system wherein the output variables can be affected by adjusting certain input variables.


A “degasser” refers to any device, component, or system that can be used to remove one or more gases from a fluid.


The term “degasser output” can refer to an amount of gas removed from a fluid by a degasser, or to the composition of gases removed from the fluid.


The term “detect” refers to ascertaining a state of a system or component.


The terms “determining,” “determines,” and the like, generally refer to, in the broadest reasonable interpretation, any process or method for obtaining or coming to a decision, value, number, or finding, for any one or more value, output, parameter, or variable, by any means applicable to the relevant parameter being determined.


The term “dialysate” refers to any mixture that provides for passing solutes of any type through a membrane of any type. Typically, a dialysate contains a concentration of solutes to exchange solutes across a gradient to and from the dialysate during dialysis therapy.


The term “dialysate flow path” refers to a pathway through which dialysate travels during dialysis therapy.


The term “dialysate flow rate” refers to a volume of dialysate moving through a system per unit of time.


The term “dialysate inlet” refers to an opening or conduit through which dialysate can enter a component.


The term “dialysate outlet” refers to an opening or conduit through which dialysate can exit a component.


The term “dialyzer” can refer to a cartridge or container with two flow paths separated by semi-permeable membranes. One flow path can be for blood and one flow path can be for dialysate. The membranes can be in hollow fibers, flat sheets, or spiral wound or other conventional forms known to those of skill in the art. Membranes can be selected from any one or combination of materials: polysulfone, polyethersulfone, poly (methyl methacrylate), modified cellulose, or other materials known to those skilled in the art.


The term “dialyzer size” refers to the amount of fluid that can be contained within a dialyzer.


The term “dilute” means to lower a concentration of one or more solutes in solution.


The term “downstream” refers to a position of a first component in a flow path relative to a second component wherein fluid, gas, or combinations thereof, will pass by the second component prior to the first component during normal operation. The first component can be said to be “downstream” of the second component, while the second component is “upstream” of the first component.


The term “estimate” can refer to an approximation of a value for a particular parameter.


The terms “exit” or “exiting” refer to a fluid leaving a container or component.


The term “fluidly connectable” refers to the ability to provide passage of fluid, gas, or combinations thereof, from one point to another point. The ability to provide such passage can be any mechanical connection, fastening, or forming between two points to permit the flow of fluid, gas, or combinations thereof. The two points can be within or between any one or more of compartments, modules, systems, components, and rechargers, all of any type. Notably, the components that are fluidly connectable, need not be a part of a structure. For example, an outlet “fluidly connectable” to a pump does not require the pump, but merely that the outlet has the features necessary for fluid connection to the pump.


The term “fluidly connected” refers to a particular state or configuration of one or more components such that fluid, gas, or combination thereof, can flow from one point to another point. The connection state can also include an optional unconnected state or configuration, such that the two points are disconnected from each other to discontinue flow. It will be further understood that the two “fluidly connectable” points, as defined above, can form a “fluidly connected” state. The two points can be within or between any one or more of compartments, modules, systems, components, all of any type.


The term “hydrochloric acid source” refers to any source from which hydrochloric acid, or HCl, can be obtained.


The term “infusate source” refers to one or more sources of cations, such as potassium, calcium, or magnesium cations, for addition to a dialysate.


The term “isolate” refers to configuring a system such that a given component is not in fluid communication with a second given component.


The term “low pH” refers to a pH low enough that will result in substantially all bicarbonate being converted to carbon dioxide.


The term “measuring” or “to measure” can refer to determining any parameter or variable. The parameter or variable can relate to any state or value of a system, component, fluid, gas, or mixtures of one or more gases or fluids.


The term “patient bicarbonate level” refers to the bicarbonate concentration in the blood of a patient.


The term “patient size” refers to the mass or weight of a patient.


The term “patient urea level” refers to the urea concentration in the blood of a patient.


“pH” is a value equal to the negative log of the H+ ion concentration in a fluid.


The term “pH sensor” refers to any sensor or set of sensors that can be used to determine the pH of a fluid.


The term “preset” refers to a value of a parameter or state of a component or system that is determined in advance of a dialysis session.


The term “programmed,” when referring to a processor, can mean a series of instructions that cause a processor to perform certain steps.


The term “release” refers to one or more substances being added by a component to a fluid.


The term “sodium” refers to Na ions in solution.


The term “sodium concentration” refers to an amount of sodium ions dissolved in a given amount of solvent.


A “sodium prescription” is an intended sodium concentration in a dialysate or blood.


The terms “sorbent cartridge” and “sorbent container” can refer to a cartridge containing one or more sorbent materials for removing specific solutes from solution, such as urea. The term “sorbent cartridge” does not require the contents in the cartridge be sorbent based, and the contents of the sorbent cartridge can be any contents that can remove waste products from a dialysate. The sorbent cartridge may include any suitable amount of one or more sorbent materials. In certain instances, the term “sorbent cartridge” can refer to a cartridge which includes one or more sorbent materials in addition to one or more other materials capable of removing waste products from dialysate. “Sorbent cartridge” can include configurations where at least some materials in the cartridge do not act by mechanisms of adsorption or absorption. In any embodiment, a system may include a number of separate cartridges which can be physically separated or interconnected wherein such cartridges can be optionally detached and reattached as desired. The term “sulfate ions” refers to SO42 in acid or basic form, or with any counter ions.


The term “target post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint” refers to a conductivity value, measured after bicarbonate has been added to a fluid, that will result in an intended prescription for a dialysate.


The term “target post-sorbent conductivity setpoint” refers to a conductivity value, measured after a fluid has passed through a sorbent cartridge, that will result in an intended prescription for a dialysate.


The term “target pre-sorbent conductivity setpoint” refers to a conductivity value, measured before a fluid has passed through a sorbent cartridge, that will result in an intended prescription for a dialysate.


The term “ultrafiltration rate” refers to a volume of fluid removed from the blood of a patient per unit of time.


The term “upstream” refers to a position of a first component in a flow path relative to a second component wherein fluid, gas, or combinations thereof, will pass by the first component prior to the second component during normal operation. The first component can be said to be “upstream” of the second component, while the second component is “downstream” of the first component.


A “water source” can be any fluid source from which water can be obtained. The source can be any type of reservoir, fluid line, or receptacle. The water from the water source can be water with or without any dissolved solutes, including one or more buffer or ions.


“Zirconium phosphate” is a sorbent material that removes cations from a fluid, exchanging the removed cations for different cations.


Sodium and Bicarbonate Control


FIG. 1 is a simplified diagram of a sorbent-based dialysis system. A dialyzer 102 can be fluidly connected to an extracorporeal flow path (not shown) and fluidly connectable to a dialysate flow path 101. Blood from a patient can enter the dialyzer 102 through blood inlet 103 and exit the dialyzer 102 through blood outlet 104. At the same time, dialysate can enter the dialyzer 102 through dialysate inlet 106 and exit through dialysate outlet 107. The dialysate and blood are separated in the dialyzer 102 by semi-permeable membrane 105. Solutes and fluid can pass between the blood and the dialysate through semi-permeable membrane 105.


After exiting the dialyzer 102, the dialysate can be pumped through dialysate flow path 101. One or more pumps (not shown) can provide the driving force necessary to control the movement of dialysate through the dialysate flow path 101. A portion of the dialysate can be drawn off as ultrafiltrate by ultrafiltration system 108. If necessary to control sodium concentration, water can be added to the dialysate from water source 110. The used dialysate can be pumped through sorbent cartridge 112 to regenerate the dialysate.


The sorbent cartridge 112 can include one or more sorbent materials to remove solutes from the dialysate, allowing the dialysate to be reused. In certain embodiments, the sorbent cartridge 112 can include activated carbon to remove creatinine, glucose, uric acid, β2-microglobulin and other non-ionic toxins, except urea, from the dialysate. The sorbent cartridge can also include urease, which converts urea to ammonium ions and carbon dioxide. Zirconium oxide in the sorbent cartridge 112 can remove phosphate, fluoride, and other anions from the dialysate. Zirconium phosphate in sorbent cartridge 112 can remove the ammonium ions generated from the breakdown of urea by the urease, as well as potassium, calcium, and magnesium cations. The cations removed by the zirconium phosphate can be exchanged for sodium and hydrogen ions.


Carbon dioxide present in the dialysate exiting the sorbent cartridge 112 can be removed by degasser 113 located downstream of the sorbent cartridge 112. Bicarbonate can be added to the dialysate from bicarbonate source 115 and cations, such as potassium, magnesium, and calcium, can be added back into the dialysate from cation infusate source 117. In certain embodiments, bypass line 120 and bypass valve 119 can be included to bypass either the dialyzer 102 or the sorbent cartridge 112.


One of skill in the art will understand that the system illustrated in FIG. 1 is a simplified system for illustrative purposes only. Additional components can be included. For example, additional pumps and valves can be included for operation of the degassing system, as well as control over ultrafiltration and addition of water, bicarbonate, and cation infusate. The pumps and valves can be operated by a control system (not shown). The control system can be programmed to receive data from sensors at various positions in the dialysate flow path 101, to determine any parameters or system state based on the received data, and to control the components of the dialysis system. For example, conductivity sensor 109 can be included to determine the conductivity of the dialysate exiting the dialyzer 102. Conductivity sensor 111 can be included to determine the conductivity of dialysate after addition of water and prior to reaching the sorbent cartridge 112. Conductivity sensor 114 can be included to measure the conductivity of the dialysate after the degasser and prior to addition of bicarbonate solution. Conductivity sensor 116 can be used to measure the conductivity of the dialysate after addition of bicarbonate and prior to addition of cation infusate. Conductivity sensor 118 can be included to measure the conductivity after the addition of the cation infusate to ensure the final dialysate has a proper composition prior to reaching the dialyzer 102. Additional sensors (not shown), such as temperature sensors, pressure sensors, pH sensors, or any other sensors can be included.


In certain embodiments, the system can control the sodium and bicarbonate concentrations in the dialysate using a two-phase approach. FIG. 2 is a flow chart showing control over the sodium and bicarbonate concentration during the first phase. In step 201, the process can begin. In the beginning of a dialysis session, the sorbent cartridge 112 can be a low-pH sorbent cartridge. The pH of the sorbent cartridge can be controlled by controlling the initial hydrogen to sodium ratio of the zirconium phosphate. A higher proportion of hydrogen ions will result in a lower pH of fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge.


When the sorbent cartridge effluent pH is below a preset pH, substantially all bicarbonate in the dialysate will be converted to carbon dioxide and subsequently removed by the degasser, effectively reducing the total CO2 or bicarbonate to a level approaching 0-mM and allowing control over both the sodium and bicarbonate concentration in the dialysate. In step 202, the system can determine a post-sorbent conductivity setpoint that will result in a desired sodium concentration. Knowing that the bicarbonate level is near zero allows an accurate conductivity value to be determined because the sorbent effluent will mainly depend on the concentration of sodium and chloride. The post-sorbent conductivity setpoint can be set based on both the sodium and bicarbonate prescriptions. For example, if a dialysate sodium of 140-mM and bicarbonate of 40-mM are desired, the sodium chloride level needed at sorbent outlet would be 100-mM and the conductivity set-point would correspond to the conductivity of a 100-mM sodium chloride solution. The remaining 40 mM of sodium will be added by addition of sodium bicarbonate after the dialysate passes through the degasser 113. Water from water source 110 can be added to the dialysate to dilute the dialysate if necessary to reach the post-sorbent conductivity setpoint in step 203. Although illustrated in FIG. 1 as upstream of the sorbent cartridge 112, the water source 110 can alternatively be positioned downstream of the sorbent cartridge 112.


The bicarbonate concentration of the dialysate is controlled in step 204. As described, during phase 1 control, the pH of the sorbent cartridge effluent is low enough to convert substantially all bicarbonate to carbon dioxide, which is removed by degasser 113. To accurately control bicarbonate concentration in the dialysate, sodium bicarbonate from bicarbonate source 115 can be added. The system can control the addition of bicarbonate to achieve a post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint as measured by conductivity sensor 116. The post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint can be a fixed value based on the sodium and bicarbonate prescription. Alternatively, the post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint can be based on achieving a target conductivity delta between the post-degasser conductivity sensor 114 and the post-bicarbonate conductivity sensor 116. For example, a bicarbonate prescription of 40-mM would require the addition of 40-mM bicarbonate from the bicarbonate source, which corresponds to a certain conductivity increase between conductivity sensor 114 and 116. Therefore, the bicarbonate source can be added to achieve the desired conductivity increase at sensor 116 relative to sensor 114. After the bicarbonate is added to the dialysate, a cation infusate can be added to control the potassium, calcium, and magnesium concentrations. In certain embodiments, the cation infusate can also include sodium. In such embodiments, the post-sorbent conductivity set point can be adjusted to account for the additional sodium.


As described, the phase 1 control over sodium and bicarbonate can continue while the sorbent effluent pH is low enough to convert substantially all the bicarbonate to carbon dioxide. In step 205, the system can monitor the sorbent cartridge effluent pH, and determine whether the sorbent cartridge effluent pH is below a preset pH. If the sorbent cartridge effluent pH is below the preset pH, the method can continue in step 203, with control over both sodium and bicarbonate. If the pH exceeds the preset pH, some level of bicarbonate can remain in the dialysate after passing through the sorbent cartridge 112 and degasser 113. The system can then switch to a phase 2 control method in step 206. In certain embodiments, the preset pH for the sorbent cartridge effluent pH can be about 4.8, which will result in substantially all the bicarbonate being removed from the dialysate.


One of skill in the art will understand that several options for determining when to switch to phase 2 control can be used. Optionally, the system can use a pH sensor at the outlet of the sorbent cartridge to measure the effluent pH. Alternatively, the system can monitor the degasser output to determine changes in the sorbent effluent pH. As the pH rises, there will be less CO2 to degas, and the degasser output will decrease. In certain embodiments, the system can detect the sorbent cartridge effluent pH state based on conductivity changes across the sorbent cartridge. As the pH of the sorbent cartridge increases, the bicarbonate concentration, and corresponding sodium concentration, increases, resulting in a smaller conductivity change across the sorbent cartridge. The system can also detect the sorbent cartridge effluent pH state based on changes in the water addition rate needed to maintain the sorbent outlet conductivity target during phase one control. As the pH rises and the sodium bicarbonate concentration increases, the sorbent outlet conductivity will increase and require an increase in water dilution to maintain the post-sorbent conductivity setpoint. Periodic isolation of the sorbent cartridge from the dialyzer and measurement of the above parameters can also be used to predict the sorbent cartridge pH state. Isolation of the dialyzer removes unknown contributions to the dialysate from the patient and results on a more accurate prediction of the pH state. To isolate the sorbent cartridge from the dialyzer, dialysate can be pumped through a bypass line, such as bypass line 120 in FIG. 1, recirculating the dialysate through the sorbent cartridge 112 without passing through the dialyzer 102. Refinement of the pH state determination using the described methods can be achieved by using more than one method listed, either to refine detection with a single-method or used together. Also, detection can be refined based on early conductivity changes across the dialyzer and/or across the sorbent cartridge. These early conductivity changes can be indicative of patient levels and used to further refine detection of the dialysate pH. In addition, integration of the conductivity change across the sorbent cartridge can be used as a measure of the cumulative bicarbonate exposure to the sorbent cartridge, and transition to phase two control can be done when the cumulative exposure reaches a preset value.


Alternatively, the detection of sorbent outlet pH can be determined based on the conductivity change across the sorbent cartridge normalized to the water dilution rate needed to achieve the target post-sorbent conductivity set-point by using equation (1): (SCS−PCS)/(1-Q-H2O/QDout), wherein SCS is the conductivity measured by conductivity sensor 114, PCS is the conductivity measured by conductivity sensor, Q-H2O is the water addition rate from water source 110, and QDout is the dialysate flow rate at the dialyzer outlet 107. In addition, the SCS and PCS values used in equation (1) can be offset in time due to the volume of the sorbent cartridge and the time it takes fluid to flow from the inlet of the cartridge to the outlet. For example, a sorbent cartridge with a void volume of 4 liters will require 8 minutes for fluid to flow from the inlet to outlet at a flow rate of 500-mL/min. Therefore, the SCS value at 8 minutes should be compared to the PCS value at 0 minutes. The conductivity delta across the sorbent cartridge, SCS-PCS, is mainly influenced by the concentration of sodium bicarbonate entering the sorbent cartridge, which is determined by the prescription and patient parameters. In the low pH phase, all of the sodium bicarbonate entering the cartridge is removed resulting in a conductivity decrease. Because the SCS-PCS, or conductivity delta across the sorbent cartridge, can vary in the low pH phase due to difference in prescription or patient parameters, a plateau value can be calculated and subsequent conductivity deltas across the sorbent cartridge can be compared to the plateau value to determine when the pH has increased to the preset value. The plateau value can be determined by averaging the SCS-PCS values over a certain time, or dialysate volume, and starting at a particular dialysate volume. For example, after 40-liters of dialysate volume the SCS-PCS values, or the values calculated in Eq (1), can be averaged from to 50-liters. Then the conductivity delta across the sorbent cartridge (SCS-PCS) can be compared to the average plateau value to determine when the pH value has exceeded the preset value. For example, an increase in SCS-PCS of 0.44-mS/cm relative to the plateau value can indicate the pH has risen to a value exceeding 4.8. Values other than an increase of 0.44-mS/cm can be used depending on properties of the sorbent cartridge used or other factors such as dialysate prescription or patient parameters. The volume to start the averaging for the plateau value should start before the sorbent cartridge pH begins to rise. The volume can be based on the dialysate bicarbonate prescription. In a sorbent cartridge utilizing a zirconium phosphate sorbent as the pH controlling buffer source, the accumulation of bicarbonate through the sorbent cartridge will eventually exceed the buffering capacity of the zirconium phosphate and result in a rising pH. Therefore, a higher bicarbonate prescription will result in a sorbent cartridge pH rise sooner than a lower bicarbonate prescription. A bicarbonate prescription of 30-mM could start the plateau averaging at 60-liters and a bicarbonate prescription of 40-mM could start the plateau averaging at 40-liters, for example.


In certain embodiments, the sorbent cartridge effluent pH may remain below the preset pH value for the entire dialysis session. In such cases, the system can control the dialysate sodium and bicarbonate concentrations using the phase 1 method illustrated in FIG. 2 throughout the dialysis session. In certain embodiments, an acid source, such as a hydrochloric acid source, can be included upstream of the sorbent cartridge to acidify the dialysate prior to reaching the sorbent cartridge. Acidifying the dialysate can keep the sorbent cartridge effluent pH low, prolonging the time during which phase 1 control can be used. The low sorbent effluent pH can also be maintained by using a sufficient amount of zirconium phosphate at low pH, or by limiting the total volume of dialysate used during the dialysis session. In certain embodiments, the zirconium phosphate pH can refer to a slurry pH, which is the measured pH of zirconium phosphate slurried in water. A “low pH” zirconium phosphate can refer to zirconium phosphate having a slurry pH of below about 5.


As the pH rises above the preset pH, the amount of bicarbonate, post-degassing, can increase to greater than 1 mM, and potentially up to prescription levels of 30 to 40 mM, depending on the pH at sorbent outlet and the total CO2 level in the spent dialysate entering the sorbent cartridge. During this second phase, the unpredictable bicarbonate level at sorbent outlet makes controlling to an accurate sodium and bicarbonate prescription level more difficult. FIG. 3 is a flow chart illustrating the phase 2 method of sodium and bicarbonate control in the dialysate with a higher pH in the dialysate exiting the sorbent cartridge. As described, the method can begin in step 301 using phase 2 control, after the sorbent cartridge effluent pH has exceeded the preset value.


In contrast to the phase 1 control illustrated in FIG. 2, the phase 2 control of FIG. 3 can use a pre-sorbent conductivity set point. In step 302, the system can determine the pre-sorbent conductivity set point as measured by conductivity sensor 111 illustrated in FIG. 1. The pre-sorbent conductivity set point is based on learning the sorbent inlet conductivity value used towards the end of the first phase of control. Over the course of a therapy session, the patient blood and the dialysate will approach equilibrium with each other, and the dialysate outlet conductivity measured by conductivity sensor 109 and subsequent sorbent inlet conductivity measured by conductivity sensor 111 will reach a stable value. Therefore, if the first phase of control occurs over a significant volume, i.e., greater than 30-liters, the pre-sorbent conductivity value can be assumed to have reached a stable value and can be used as the pre-sorbent conductivity set point for the second phase of control. In addition, the rate of change in the pre-sorbent conductivity (PCS), or PCS profile, can be learned during the first phase of control and used to control to a PCS profile in the second phase of control. For example, a steadily changing PCS value can be fit to a curve or a line and the PCS values to target as a function of dialysate volume can be extrapolated based on the fit during phase 2. Using the pre-sorbent conductivity set point determined in step 302, the system can control the water addition rate to achieve the pre-sorbent conductivity set point in step 303.


The phase 2 control can also rely on a predictable change in chloride concentration across the sorbent cartridge. In the case of the REDY type sorbent system, the chloride concentration can be assumed to be unchanged across the sorbent cartridge. Therefore, the PCS value determined in phase 1 is equal to the PCS value needed to achieve the desired chloride level, based on the dialysate prescription, at the sorbent inlet and subsequently the sorbent outlet, relying on the unchanging chloride concentration across the sorbent cartridge. The second aspect of control during the second phase involves adding sodium bicarbonate post-sorbent cartridge at a rate Q-Base to a conductivity value (BCS), which is the conductivity measured by conductivity sensor 116, based on the sodium and bicarbonate prescription value in step 304. Because the composition of dialysate needed after addition of sodium bicarbonate is accurately known based on the prescription, the composition error is minimized using this approach. Depending on the sorbent outlet pH and the total CO2 exiting the sorbent cartridge, the bicarbonate concentration can vary be between 1 mM and 40 mM in concentration. Typically, in phase 2 the sorbent outlet pH will increase steadily resulting in a gradual increase of the bicarbonate concentration exiting the sorbent cartridge. Therefore, the amount of sodium bicarbonate that must be added to achieve the post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint may vary. In step 305, the dialysis session can continue until the end of the session using the phase 2 control.


In certain embodiments, the system can use phase 1 control as long as possible before the sorbent cartridge effluent pH exceeds the preset value. Delaying the transition to phase 2 control as long as possible allows for further equilibration between the patient and dialysate and determination of a more accurate sorbent inlet conductivity setpoint or profile to be used during phase two control.


In some cases, there may be a need for an additional phase of control, between the first and second phases, due to release of sulfate from the sorbent cartridge. Some sorbent cartridge designs can remove sulfate when the sorbent cartridge is in a low pH phase, but as the pH rises (above 4.5 for example), the sulfate may be released. The release of sulfate will also result in the release of sodium, to maintain charge balance. At pH values above 3, sulfates primarily exist as a divalent anion and will require two sodium ions for charge balance. The release of sodium sulfate will result in a sorbent outlet conductivity increase that will require additional dilution water (Q-H2O) to maintain the sorbent outlet conductivity at the phase 1 set-point. However, because sulfate will be present in the sorbent outlet, an adjusted conductivity setpoint can be determined based on the methods used for phase one control, except with a non-zero level for sulfate, because although sulfate is being released due to slightly higher sorbent outlet pH, while the pH is still less than 4.8, the bicarbonate concentration is still negligible. Therefore, the sodium bicarbonate addition rate can be controlled using the phase 1 control illustrated in FIG. 2. However, the increased dilution water needed during sulfate release will result in a lower sorbent inlet conductivity (PCS) value, which is not indicative of the value needed for phase two control. Therefore, if sulfate release occurs, the pre-sorbent conductivity set-point used for phase two control should be based on the value, or profile, preceding the sulfate release. The sulfate release can be detected by monitoring changes in the dilution water rate and/or changes in the conductivity change across the sorbent cartridge. The sulfate release can be detected using the methods described above using the average plateau conductivity value and an increase relative to the average plateau value of 0.2-mS/cm. Values other than an increase of 0.2-mS/cm can be used depending on properties of the sorbent cartridge used or other factors such as dialysate prescription or patient parameters. The end of the sulfate release phase and the start of the second control phase can also be based on dilution water changes and/or sorbent cartridge conductivity changes, or can be based on a fixed volume, such as 5 or 10 liters of dialysate. In the case of using sorbent conductivity changes to determine the end of the sulfate release phase, the sorbent conductivity delta can continue to be monitored relative to the average plateau value and when it increases to a value of 0.44-mS/cm above the plateau value the sulfate release phase can be considered complete and the pH value above the phase 1 preset value. Any of the methods described for monitoring changes in sorbent cartridge effluent pH can also be used to determine if or when sulfate release occurs.


An example of the control approach utilized a prototype hemodialysis test system configured the same as FIG. 1, with the addition of a pH sensor between the sorbent cartridge and degasser. A simulated patient 18-liter patient tank was connected to the dialyzer (Clearum HS13) and recirculated through inlet 103 and outlet 104 at a rate of 500-mL/min. The dialysate was recirculated at a flow rate of 600-mL/min through the dialyzer at inlet 106 and outlet 107. The dialysate was controlled to a prescription composition target of 145-mM sodium, 40-mM bicarbonate, 2-mM potassium, 1.5-mM calcium and 0.375-mM magnesium. The patient had a composition of 131-mM sodium, 34.1-mM bicarbonate, 3.6-mM sulfate, 5-mM potassium, 0.4-mM magnesium, 1.3-mM calcium and 33-mM urea. The sorbent cartridge used contained activated carbon, urease, activated alumina, zirconium phosphate and hydrous zirconium oxide. A 200-minute simulated therapy was performed. FIG. 4 shows the sorbent outlet pH profile versus the cumulative dialysate volume during the simulated therapy. The pH stayed below 5 for the first 80-liters of dialysate and then increased to 6.5 by the end of therapy at 120-liters of dialysate. Also, shown in FIG. 4 is the delta conductivity across the sorbent cartridge calculated using equation 1. Finally, the sulfate level in the dialysate is shown over the course of therapy, where levels start to increase at 70-liters, peak at 97-liters and then start to decrease. For this simulated therapy, a plateau delta conductivity value of −2.59-mS/cm was calculated by averaging the delta conductivity from 60 to 65-liters. In order to determine when sulfate release occurred, and adjust the SCS conductivity target, a value of 0.2-mS/cm was used to compare to the plateau delta condo value. Using this value, the sulfate release was detected at 77-liters, which corresponds to a level of 1.5-mM sulfate as shown in FIG. 4. In order to determine when the pH exceeded a preset value of 4.9, and switch to phase 2 control, a value of 0.44 was used to compare to the plateau delta conductivity value. Using this value, a pH of 4.9 was predicted to occur at 88-liters, compared to the measured pH of 5.0 at 88-liters. The phase two control started at 88-liters and the bicarbonate metering rate (1000-mM solution of sodium bicarbonate shown as Q-Base in FIG. 1) over the course of therapy is shown in FIG. 5, along with the sorbent outlet pH profile. As shown in FIG. 5, the bicarbonate pump rate steadily decreases after the start of phase 2 control due to the increasing sorbent outlet pH and the increase of bicarbonate at sorbent outlet, requiring less bicarbonate to be metered in to meet the prescription of 40-mM bicarbonate. The bicarbonate metering rate is relatively constant during the low pH phase from 0 to 88-liters. FIG. 6 shows the water pump metering rate (Q-H2O in FIG. 1) and sorbent outlet pH profile versus dialysate volume. As can be seen, as the pH starts to rise and the sulfate release starts to occur at 75-liters, the water metering starts to increase more rapidly. This increased water metering rate could also be used to predict when the sulfate release and preset pH value are reached. FIG. 7 shows the degasser pump output along with the sorbent outlet pH profile over the course of therapy. When the pH starts to rise above 4.9, the degasser output % decreases rapidly from about 50% to 40% when the pH increases from about 4.9 to 5.5. This change in degasser output could also be used to indicate when the preset pH value has been exceeded. FIG. 8 shows the measured dialysate sodium and bicarbonate levels along with the pH profile over the course of therapy. The target sodium level of 145-mM and the target bicarbonate (HCO3) level of 40-mM were achieved throughout therapy within 5% or better of target. Even during the rapid pH increase out of the sorbent cartridge starting at 85-liters, when the bicarbonate level leaving the sorbent cartridge starts to increase.


One of skill in the art will understand the data used in FIGS. 4-8 are from a simulated patient and provided for illustrative purposes only. The same methods can be used with any patient to accurately control the sodium and bicarbonate content of the dialysate.


One skilled in the art will understand that various combinations and/or modifications and variations can be made in the described systems and methods depending upon the specific needs for operation. Various aspects disclosed herein may be combined in different combinations than the combinations specifically presented in the description and accompanying drawings. Moreover, features illustrated or described as being part of an aspect of the disclosure may be used in the aspect of the disclosure, either alone or in combination, or follow a preferred arrangement of one or more of the described elements. Depending on the example, certain acts or events of any of the processes or methods described herein may be performed in a different sequence, may be added, merged, or left out altogether (e.g., certain described acts or events may not be necessary to carry out the techniques). In addition, while certain aspects of this disclosure are described as performed by a single module or unit for purposes of clarity, the techniques of this disclosure may be performed by a combination of units or modules associated with, for example, a medical device.

Claims
  • 1. A system, comprising: a dialysate flow path; the dialysate flow path fluidly connectable to a dialysate inlet of a dialyzer and a dialysate outlet of the dialyzer;a sorbent cartridge in the dialysate flow path;a degasser in the dialysate flow path downstream of the sorbent cartridge;a bicarbonate source fluidly connected to the dialysate flow path;a water source fluidly connected to the dialysate flow path;a first conductivity sensor downstream of the sorbent cartridge; anda control system; the control system programmed to determine a pH of a fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge; wherein:while pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is below a preset pH, the control system is programmed to control a sodium concentration in the fluid based on a sodium prescription and a conductivity measured by the first conductivity sensor; and to control a bicarbonate concentration in the fluid based on a bicarbonate prescription; andwhile pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is above a preset pH, the control system controls a sodium concentration in the fluid based on a sodium prescription and a conductivity measured by a second conductivity sensor upstream of the sorbent cartridge.
  • 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the preset pH is about 4.8.
  • 3. The system of claim 1, wherein the sorbent cartridge includes zirconium phosphate at a low pH.
  • 4. The system of claim 1, wherein while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is below the preset pH, the control system is programmed to control the sodium concentration in the fluid by adding water from a water source upstream of the sorbent cartridge to a target post-sorbent conductivity setpoint.
  • 5. The system of claim 1, wherein while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is below the preset pH, the control system is programmed to control the bicarbonate concentration in the fluid by adding bicarbonate from a bicarbonate source upstream of the sorbent cartridge to a target post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint.
  • 6. The system of claim 1, further comprising a hydrochloric acid source fluidly connected to the dialysate flow path upstream of the sorbent cartridge.
  • 7. The system of claim 1, further comprising at least one infusate source downstream of the sorbent cartridge.
  • 8. The system of claim 1, wherein the control system is programmed to detect release of sulfate ions from the sorbent cartridge.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the control system is programmed to dilute the fluid during the release of sulfate ions.
  • 10. The system of claim 1, wherein while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is above the preset pH, the control system is programmed to control the sodium concentration in the fluid by adding water from a water source upstream of the sorbent cartridge to a target pre-sorbent conductivity setpoint.
  • 11. The system of claim 10, wherein the target pre-sorbent conductivity setpoint is a conductivity measured upstream of the sorbent cartridge while the pH is below the preset pH.
  • 12. The system of claim 10, wherein while the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is above the preset pH, the control system is programmed to control the bicarbonate concentration in the fluid by adding bicarbonate to reach a target post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint.
  • 13. The system of claim 12, wherein the target post-bicarbonate conductivity setpoint is based on the sodium and a bicarbonate prescription.
  • 14. The system of claim 1, wherein the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is measured with a pH sensor downstream of the sorbent cartridge.
  • 15. The system of claim 1, wherein the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is measured based on changes to a degasser output.
  • 16. The system of claim 1, wherein the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is measured based on a conductivity change across the sorbent cartridge measured by the first conductivity sensor and a second conductivity sensor upstream of the sorbent cartridge.
  • 17. The system of claim 4, wherein the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge is measured based on a volume of the water added from the water source.
  • 18. The system of claim 1, the control system programmed to isolate the sorbent cartridge prior to determining the pH of the fluid exiting the sorbent cartridge.
US Referenced Citations (329)
Number Name Date Kind
3602222 Herndon Aug 1971 A
3608729 Haselden Sep 1971 A
3669878 Marantz Jun 1972 A
3669880 Marantz Jun 1972 A
3730183 Goldsmith May 1973 A
3754867 Guenther Aug 1973 A
3850835 Marantz Nov 1974 A
3884808 Scott May 1975 A
3989622 Marantz Nov 1976 A
4060485 Eaton Nov 1977 A
4371385 Johnson Feb 1983 A
4374382 Markowitz Feb 1983 A
4381999 Boucher May 1983 A
4460555 Thompson Jul 1984 A
4556063 Thompson Dec 1985 A
4562751 Nason Jan 1986 A
4581141 Ash Apr 1986 A
4650587 Polak Mar 1987 A
4661246 Ash Apr 1987 A
4678408 Mason Jul 1987 A
4685903 Cable Aug 1987 A
4747822 Peabody May 1988 A
4750494 King Jun 1988 A
4772560 Attar Sep 1988 A
4799493 DuFault Jan 1989 A
4826663 Alberti May 1989 A
4828693 Lindsay May 1989 A
5032265 Jha Jul 1991 A
5080653 Voss Jan 1992 A
5091642 Chow Feb 1992 A
5092886 Dobos-Hardy Mar 1992 A
5097122 Coiman Mar 1992 A
5127404 Wyborny Jul 1992 A
5141493 Jacobsen Aug 1992 A
5284470 Beltz Feb 1994 A
5302288 Meidl Apr 1994 A
5305745 Zacouto Apr 1994 A
5318750 Lascombes Jun 1994 A
5468388 Goddard Nov 1995 A
5507723 Keshaviah Apr 1996 A
5643201 Peabody Jul 1997 A
5651893 Kenley Jul 1997 A
5683432 Goedeke Nov 1997 A
5744031 Bene Apr 1998 A
5762782 Kenley Jun 1998 A
5819007 Elghazzawi Oct 1998 A
5902336 Mishkin May 1999 A
5944684 Roberts Aug 1999 A
5987352 Klein Nov 1999 A
6048732 Anslyn Apr 2000 A
6052622 Holmstrom Apr 2000 A
6058331 King May 2000 A
6156002 Polaschegg Dec 2000 A
6230059 Duffin May 2001 B1
6248093 Moberg Jun 2001 B1
6254567 Treu Jul 2001 B1
6321101 Holmstrom Nov 2001 B1
6362591 Moberg Mar 2002 B1
6363279 Ben-Haim Mar 2002 B1
6505075 Weiner Jan 2003 B1
6554798 Mann Apr 2003 B1
6555986 Moberg Apr 2003 B2
6589229 Connelly Jul 2003 B1
6602399 Fromherz Aug 2003 B1
6609023 Fischell Aug 2003 B1
6627164 Wong Sep 2003 B1
6645191 Knerr Nov 2003 B1
6676608 Keren Jan 2004 B1
6689083 Gelfand Feb 2004 B1
6706007 Gelfand Mar 2004 B2
6711439 Bradley Mar 2004 B1
6726647 Sternby Apr 2004 B1
6780322 Bissler Aug 2004 B1
6818196 Wong Nov 2004 B2
6878283 Thompson Apr 2005 B2
6887214 Levin May 2005 B1
6890315 Levin May 2005 B1
6960179 Gura Nov 2005 B2
7074332 Summerton Jul 2006 B2
7077819 Goldau Jul 2006 B1
7131956 Pirazzoli Nov 2006 B1
7175809 Gelfand Feb 2007 B2
7208092 Micheli Apr 2007 B2
7276042 Polaschegg Oct 2007 B2
7399289 Gelfand Jul 2008 B2
7404799 Koh Jul 2008 B1
7500958 Asbrink Mar 2009 B2
7566432 Wong Jul 2009 B2
7575564 Childers Aug 2009 B2
7610086 Ke Oct 2009 B1
7674231 Mccombie Mar 2010 B2
7704361 Garde Apr 2010 B2
7736507 Wong Jun 2010 B2
7744553 Kelly Jun 2010 B2
7754852 Burnett Jul 2010 B2
7756572 Fard Jul 2010 B1
7775983 Zhang Aug 2010 B2
7775986 Roeher Aug 2010 B2
7776210 Rosenbaum Aug 2010 B2
7785463 Bissler Aug 2010 B2
7794141 Perry Sep 2010 B2
7850635 Polaschegg Dec 2010 B2
7857976 Bissler Dec 2010 B2
7867214 Childers Jan 2011 B2
7896831 Sternby Mar 2011 B2
7922686 Childers Apr 2011 B2
7922911 Micheli Apr 2011 B2
7947179 Rosenbaum May 2011 B2
7955291 Sternby Jun 2011 B2
7967022 Grant Jun 2011 B2
7981082 Wang Jul 2011 B2
8034161 Gura Oct 2011 B2
8070709 Childers Dec 2011 B2
8096969 Roberts Jan 2012 B2
8105260 Tonelli Jan 2012 B2
8183046 Lu May 2012 B2
8187250 Roberts May 2012 B2
8197439 Wang Jun 2012 B2
8202241 Karakama Jun 2012 B2
8246826 Wilt Aug 2012 B2
8273049 Demers Sep 2012 B2
8282828 Wallenas Oct 2012 B2
8292594 Tracey Oct 2012 B2
8313642 Yu Nov 2012 B2
8317492 Demers Nov 2012 B2
8357113 Childers Jan 2013 B2
8366316 Kamen Feb 2013 B2
8366655 Kamen Feb 2013 B2
8404091 Ding Mar 2013 B2
8409441 Wilt Apr 2013 B2
8496809 Roger Jul 2013 B2
8499780 Wilt Aug 2013 B2
8500676 Jansson Aug 2013 B2
8512271 Moissl Aug 2013 B2
8518260 Raimann Aug 2013 B2
8521482 Akonur Aug 2013 B2
8535525 Heyes Sep 2013 B2
8560510 Brueggerhoff Oct 2013 B2
8580112 Updyke Nov 2013 B2
8597227 Childers Dec 2013 B2
8696626 Kirsch Apr 2014 B2
8903492 Soykan Dec 2014 B2
8926542 Gerber Jan 2015 B2
20020016550 Sweeney Feb 2002 A1
20020042561 Schulman Apr 2002 A1
20020112609 Wong Aug 2002 A1
20030028089 Galley Apr 2003 A1
20030069481 Hervy Apr 2003 A1
20030080059 Peterson May 2003 A1
20030097086 Gura May 2003 A1
20030105435 Taylor Jun 2003 A1
20030113931 Pan Jun 2003 A1
20030114787 Gura Jun 2003 A1
20030187479 Thong Oct 2003 A1
20040019312 Childers Jan 2004 A1
20040060865 Callan Apr 2004 A1
20040068219 Summerton Apr 2004 A1
20040099593 DePaolis May 2004 A1
20040147900 Polaschegg Jul 2004 A1
20040168969 Sternby Sep 2004 A1
20040215090 Erkkila Oct 2004 A1
20050065760 Murtfeldt Mar 2005 A1
20050113796 Taylor May 2005 A1
20050126961 Bissler Jun 2005 A1
20050131331 Kelly Jun 2005 A1
20050126998 Childers Jul 2005 A1
20050150832 Tsukamoto Jul 2005 A1
20050214863 McDevitt Sep 2005 A1
20050234354 Rowlandson Oct 2005 A1
20050234357 Xue Oct 2005 A1
20050234381 Niemetz Oct 2005 A1
20050234534 Rowlandson Oct 2005 A1
20050236330 Nier Oct 2005 A1
20050265895 Kopelman Dec 2005 A1
20050274658 Rosenbaum Dec 2005 A1
20060025661 Sweeney Feb 2006 A1
20060025748 Ye Feb 2006 A1
20060217771 Soykan Feb 2006 A1
20060058731 Burnett Mar 2006 A1
20060191850 Bosetto Aug 2006 A1
20060195064 Plahey Aug 2006 A1
20060226079 Mori Oct 2006 A1
20060241709 Soykan Oct 2006 A1
20060247548 Sarkar Nov 2006 A1
20060264894 Moberg Nov 2006 A1
20070007208 Brugger Jan 2007 A1
20070038138 Gill Feb 2007 A1
20070066928 Lannoy Mar 2007 A1
20070073168 Zhang Mar 2007 A1
20070138011 Hofmann Jun 2007 A1
20070161113 Ash Jul 2007 A1
20070175827 Wariar Aug 2007 A1
20070179431 Roberts Aug 2007 A1
20070213653 Childers Sep 2007 A1
20070213665 Curtin Sep 2007 A1
20070215545 Bissler Sep 2007 A1
20070255250 Moberg Nov 2007 A1
20070276270 Tran Nov 2007 A1
20080006570 Gura Jan 2008 A1
20080021337 Li Jan 2008 A1
20080053905 Brugger Mar 2008 A9
20080067132 Ross Mar 2008 A1
20080093276 Roger Apr 2008 A1
20080200866 Prisco Aug 2008 A1
20080215247 Tonelli Sep 2008 A1
20080253427 Kamen Oct 2008 A1
20090020471 Tsukamoto Jan 2009 A1
20090036825 Petersen Feb 2009 A1
20090101577 Fulkerson Apr 2009 A1
20090124869 Hu May 2009 A1
20090124963 Hogard May 2009 A1
20090127193 Updyke May 2009 A1
20090171261 Sternby Jul 2009 A1
20090264776 Vardy Oct 2009 A1
20090275849 Stewart Nov 2009 A1
20090275883 Chapman Nov 2009 A1
20090281484 Childers Nov 2009 A1
20090282980 Gura Nov 2009 A1
20090314063 Sternby Dec 2009 A1
20100004588 Yeh Jan 2010 A1
20100010429 Childers Jan 2010 A1
20100042035 Moissl Feb 2010 A1
20100076398 Scheurer Mar 2010 A1
20100078381 Merchant Apr 2010 A1
20100078387 Wong Apr 2010 A1
20100084330 Wong Apr 2010 A1
20100087771 Karakama Apr 2010 A1
20100094158 Solem Apr 2010 A1
20100113891 Barrett May 2010 A1
20100114012 Sandford May 2010 A1
20100137693 Porras Jun 2010 A1
20100137782 Jansson Jun 2010 A1
20100168546 Kamath Jul 2010 A1
20100217180 Akonur Aug 2010 A1
20100217181 Roberts Aug 2010 A1
20100224492 Ding Sep 2010 A1
20100234795 Wallenas Sep 2010 A1
20100241045 Kelly Sep 2010 A1
20100264086 Noack Oct 2010 A1
20100312172 Hoffman Dec 2010 A1
20110017665 Updyke Jan 2011 A1
20110048949 Ding et al. Mar 2011 A1
20110066006 Banet Mar 2011 A1
20110066043 Banet Mar 2011 A1
20110071465 Wang Mar 2011 A1
20110077574 Sigg Mar 2011 A1
20110077575 Kraemer Mar 2011 A1
20110079558 Raimann Apr 2011 A1
20110081728 Putnam Apr 2011 A1
20110087187 Beck Apr 2011 A1
20110100909 Stange May 2011 A1
20110106003 Childers May 2011 A1
20110130666 Dong Jun 2011 A1
20110137136 Kotanko Jun 2011 A1
20110141116 Dalesch Jun 2011 A1
20110144570 Childers Jun 2011 A1
20110184340 Tan Jul 2011 A1
20110208105 Brandl Aug 2011 A1
20110272337 Palmer Nov 2011 A1
20110301447 Park Dec 2011 A1
20110301472 Grober Dec 2011 A1
20120016228 Kroh Jan 2012 A1
20120083729 Childers Apr 2012 A1
20120085707 Beiriger Apr 2012 A1
20120115248 Ansyln May 2012 A1
20120135396 McDevitt May 2012 A1
20120181230 Kloeffel Jul 2012 A1
20120220528 VanAntwerp Aug 2012 A1
20120258545 Ash Oct 2012 A1
20120258546 Marran Oct 2012 A1
20120259276 Childers Oct 2012 A1
20120273354 Orhan et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120273415 Gerber Nov 2012 A1
20120273420 Gerber Nov 2012 A1
20120277546 Soykan Nov 2012 A1
20120277551 Gerber Nov 2012 A1
20120277552 Gerber Nov 2012 A1
20120277604 Gerber Nov 2012 A1
20120277650 Gerber Nov 2012 A1
20120277655 Gerber Nov 2012 A1
20120277722 Gerber Nov 2012 A1
20120283581 Olde et al. Nov 2012 A1
20120303079 Mahajan Nov 2012 A1
20130037465 Heyes Feb 2013 A1
20130062265 Balschat Mar 2013 A1
20130116578 An May 2013 A1
20130168316 Noguchi Jul 2013 A1
20130193073 Hogard Aug 2013 A1
20130199998 Kelly Aug 2013 A1
20130211730 Wolff Aug 2013 A1
20130213890 Kelly Aug 2013 A1
20130228517 Roger Sep 2013 A1
20130231607 Roger Sep 2013 A1
20130248426 Pouchoulin Sep 2013 A1
20130274642 Soykan Oct 2013 A1
20130324915 (Krensky)Britton Dec 2013 A1
20130330208 Ly Dec 2013 A1
20130331774 Farrell Dec 2013 A1
20140018727 Burbank Jan 2014 A1
20140018728 Plahey Jan 2014 A1
20140042092 Akonur Feb 2014 A1
20140065950 Mendelsohn Mar 2014 A1
20140088442 Soykan Mar 2014 A1
20140110340 White Apr 2014 A1
20140110341 White Apr 2014 A1
20140158538 Collier Jun 2014 A1
20140158588 Pudil Jun 2014 A1
20140158623 Pudil Jun 2014 A1
20140190876 Meyer Jul 2014 A1
20140216250 Meyer Aug 2014 A1
20140217028 Pudil Aug 2014 A1
20140217029 Meyer Aug 2014 A1
20140217030 Meyer Aug 2014 A1
20140220699 Pudil Aug 2014 A1
20140314625 Clift Oct 2014 A1
20150032023 Soykan Jan 2015 A1
20150080682 Gerber Mar 2015 A1
20150088047 Gerber Mar 2015 A1
20150144539 Pudil May 2015 A1
20150148697 Burnes May 2015 A1
20150149096 Soykan May 2015 A1
20150250427 Soykan Sep 2015 A1
20150343126 Merchant Dec 2015 A1
20150352269 Gerber Dec 2015 A1
20150367054 Gerber Dec 2015 A1
20160023467 Smith Feb 2016 A1
20160206801 Gerber Jul 2016 A1
20160331884 Sigg Nov 2016 A1
20190134289 Pudil May 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (101)
Number Date Country
101193667 Jun 2008 CN
3224823 Jan 1984 DE
0272414 Oct 1991 EP
0330892 Jul 1994 EP
1085295 Nov 2001 EP
1281351 Feb 2003 EP
2308526 Oct 2003 EP
1364666 Nov 2003 EP
0906768 Feb 2004 EP
1691863 Apr 2005 EP
2116269 Feb 2008 EP
1450879 Oct 2008 EP
1514562 Apr 2009 EP
2219703 May 2009 EP
1592494 Jun 2009 EP
2398529 Nov 2010 EP
2100553 Aug 2011 EP
1345856 Mar 2013 EP
2344220 Apr 2013 EP
1351756 Jul 2013 EP
2190498 Jul 2013 EP
1582226 Jan 2016 EP
S63-143077 Nov 1987 JP
2002533170 Oct 2002 JP
2003235965 Aug 2003 JP
2005-533573 Nov 2005 JP
1995003839 Feb 1995 WO
WO 1998054563 Dec 1998 WO
0057935 Oct 2000 WO
WO2000057935 Oct 2000 WO
2000066197 Nov 2000 WO
200170307 Sep 2001 WO
2001085295 Sep 2001 WO
2002013691 Feb 2002 WO
2003043680 May 2003 WO
2003051422 Jun 2003 WO
2004008826 Jan 2004 WO
2004009156 Jan 2004 WO
2004009158 Jan 2004 WO
2004030716 Apr 2004 WO
2004030717 Apr 2004 WO
2004064616 Aug 2004 WO
2005033701 Apr 2005 WO
2005061026 Jul 2005 WO
2005123230 Dec 2005 WO
2006011009 Feb 2006 WO
2006017446 Feb 2006 WO
2007038347 Apr 2007 WO
2007089855 Aug 2007 WO
2008037410 Apr 2008 WO
2009026603 Dec 2008 WO
2009024566 Feb 2009 WO
2009061608 May 2009 WO
2009094184 Jul 2009 WO
2010024963 Mar 2010 WO
2010028860 Mar 2010 WO
2010033314 Mar 2010 WO
2010033699 Mar 2010 WO
2010077851 Jul 2010 WO
2010096659 Oct 2010 WO
2010121820 Oct 2010 WO
2011025705 Mar 2011 WO
2011026645 Mar 2011 WO
WO 2011132046 Oct 2011 WO
2011137693 Nov 2011 WO
WO2011161056 Dec 2011 WO
2012042323 Apr 2012 WO
2012050781 Apr 2012 WO
2012051996 Apr 2012 WO
2012073420 Jul 2012 WO
2012148781 Nov 2012 WO
2012148786 Nov 2012 WO
2012148787 Nov 2012 WO
2012148789 Nov 2012 WO
2012162515 Nov 2012 WO
WO2012148788 Nov 2012 WO
WO 20120148784 Nov 2012 WO
2012172398 Dec 2012 WO
2013019179 Feb 2013 WO
2013019994 Feb 2013 WO
2013025844 Feb 2013 WO
2013028809 Feb 2013 WO
2013101292 Jul 2013 WO
2013103607 Jul 2013 WO
2013103906 Jul 2013 WO
2013110906 Aug 2013 WO
2013110919 Aug 2013 WO
2013114063 Aug 2013 WO
2013121162 Aug 2013 WO
2013140346 Sep 2013 WO
2013141896 Sep 2013 WO
14066254 May 2014 WO
14066255 May 2014 WO
14077082 May 2014 WO
2014121167 Aug 2014 WO
2014121169 Aug 2014 WO
2014211162 Aug 2014 WO
2014211163 Aug 2014 WO
WO 20140121161 Aug 2014 WO
WO2012081221 Jun 2015 WO
WO 20150159280 Oct 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (41)
Entry
[NPL105] Brynda, et. al., The detection of toman 2-microglebuiin by grating coupler immunosensor with three dimensional antibody networks. Biosensors & Bioelectronics, 1999, 363-368, 14(4).
[NPL10] Wheaton, et al., Dowex Ion Exchange Resins-Fundamentals of Ion Exchange; Jun. 2000, pp. 1-9. http://www.dow.com/scripts/litorder.asp?filepath=liquidseps/pdfs/noreg/177-01837.pdf.
[NPL111] Zhong, et. al., Miniature urea sensor based on H(+)-ion sensitive field effect transistor and its application in clinical analysis, Chin. J. Biotechnol., 1992, 57-65. 8(1).
[NPL121] Roberts M, The regenerative dialysis (REDY) sorbent system. Nephrology, 1998, 275-278:4.
[NPL142] Hemametrics, Crit-Line Hematocrit Accuracy, 2003, 1-5, vol. 1, Tech Note No. 11 (Rev. D).
[NPL144] Weissman, S., et al., Hydroxyurea-induced hepatitis in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients. Clin. Infec. Dis, (Jul. 29, 1999): 223-224.
[NPL14] Foley, et al., Long Interdialytic Interval and Martality among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis, N Engl Jrnl Med. 2011:365(12):1099-1107.
[NPL169] Wang, Fundamentals of intrathoracic impedance monitoring in heart failure, Am. J. Cardiology, 2007, 3G-10G: Suppl.
[NPL176] Bleyer, et al., Sudden and cardiac death rated in hemodialysis patients, Kidney International. 1999, 1553-1559: 55.
[NPL205] Culleton, BR et al. Effect of Frequent Nocturnal Hemodialysis vs. Conventional Hemodialysis on Left Ventricular Mass and Quality of Life. 2007 Journal of the American Medical Association 298 (11), 1291-1299.
[NPL230] Redfield, et. al., Restoration of renal response to atrial natriuretic factor in experimental low-output heat failure, Am. J. Physiol., Oct. 1, 1989, R917-923:257.
[NPL231] Rogoza, et. al., Validation of A&D UA-767 device for the self-measurement of blood pressure, Blood Pressure Monitoring, 2000, 227-231, 5(4).
[NPL234] Lima, et. al., An electrochemical sensor based on nanostructure hollandite-type manganese oxide for detection of potassium ion, Sensors, Aug. 24, 2009, 6613-8625, 9.
[NPL235] Maclean, et. al., Effects of hindlimb contraction on pressor and muscle interstitial metabolite responses in the cat, J. App. Physiol., 1998, 1583-1592, 85(4).
[NPL26] Overgaard, et. al., Activity-induced recovery of excitability in K+-depressed rat soleus muscle, Am. J. P 280: R48-R55, Jan. 1, 2001.
[NPL27] Overgaard et. al., Relations between excitability and contractility in rate soleusmuscle: role of the NA+-K+ pump and NA+-K-S gradients. Journal of Physiology, 1999, 215-225, 518(1).
[NPL306] Coast, et al. 1990, An approach to Cardiac Arrhythmia analysis Using Hidden Markov Models, IEEE Transactions On Biomedical Engineering. 1990, 37(9):826-835.
[NPL309] Weiner, et. al., Article: Cardiac Function and Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease, Book: Primer on Kidney Diseases (Author: Greenberg, et al.), 2009,499-505, 5th Ed., Saunders Elsevier, Philadelphia, PA.
[NPL322] Velasco, Optimal Fluid Control can Normalize Cardiovascular Risk Markers and Limit Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Thrice Weekly Dialysis Patients, Hemodialysis Intenational, 16:465-472, 2012.
[NPL323] Whitman, CKD and Sudden Cardiac Death: Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Therapeutic Approaches, J Am Soc Nephrol, 23:1929-1939, 2012.
[NPL324] Hall, Hospitalization for Congestive Heart Failure: United States, 2000-2010, NCHS Data Brief, No. 108, Oct. 2012.
[NPL325] Albert, Fluid Management Strategies in Heart Failure, Critical Care Nurse, 32:20-32, 2012.
[NPL328] Genovesi, et al., Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2009; 24(8):2529-2536.
[NPL32] Secemsky, et al., High prevalence of cardiac autonomic dysfunction and T-wave alternans in dialysis patients. Heart Rhythm, Apr. 2011, 592-598 : vol. 8, No. 4.
[NPL35] Wei, et. al., Fullerene-cryptand coated piezoelectric crystal urea sensor based on urease, Analytica Chimica Acta, 2001,77-85:437.
[NPL376] Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 1-140.
[NPL376] Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 141-280.
[NPL376] Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 281-420.
[NPL376] Gambro AK 96 Dialysis Machine Operators Manual, Dec. 2012. p. 421-534.
[NPL383] Leifer et al., A Study on the Temperature Variation of Rise Velocity for Large Clean Bubbles, J. Atmospheric & Oceanic Tech., vol. 17, pp. 1392-1402, Oct. 2000.
[NPL384] Talaia, Terminal Velocity of a Bubble Rise in a Liquid Column, World Acad. of Sci., Engineering & Tech., vol. 28, pp. 264-268, Published Jan. 1, 2007.
[NPL386] The FHN Trial Group. In-Center. Hemodialysis Six Times per Week versus Three Times per Week, New England Journal of Medicine, 2010 Abstract.
[NPL46] Siegenthaler, et al., Pulmonary fluid status monitoring with intrathoracic impedance, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 24:449-451, published Jan. 12, 2011.
[NPL494] John Wm Agar: Review: Understanding sorbent dialysis systems, Nephrology, vol. 15, No. 4, Jun. 1, 2010, pp. 406-411.
[NPL632] Lakerveld et al, Primary prevention of diabetes mellitus type 2 and cardiovascular diseases using a cognitive behavior program aimed at lifestyle changes in people at risk: Design of a randomized controlled trial, 2008, BMC Endocrine Disorders, 8(6): 1-19.
[NPL633] Gordhandas et al., Real-Time Extraction and Analysis of Key Morphological Features in the Electrocardiogram, for Data Compression and Clinical Decision Support, 2004, Computational Physiology, pp. 15-18.
[NPL90] Nedelkov, et. al., Design of buffer exchange surfaces and sensor chips for biosensor chip mass spectrometry, Proteomics, 2002, 441-446, 2(4).
[NPL] Green et. al., Sudden Cardiac Death in Hemodialysis Patients: an In-Depth Review , Am J Kidney Dis 57(6)921:929; published Apr. 18, 2011.
[NPL] Rajan et al. Generalized Feature Extraction for Time-Varying Autoregressive Models, IEEE Transacion Signal Processing vol. 44, No. 10; published Oct. 1, 1996.
Laurent, Jeanpierre, “Continuous Monitoring of Dynamic Systems: Application to Monitoring of Dialyzed Patients” Oct. 30, 2004, received from internet: http://laurent.jeanpierre1.free.fr/recherche/papiers/aista2004.pdf.
Wollenstein, et al, “Colorimetric gas sensors for the detection of ammonia, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide: current status and research trends”, Sensor and Test Conference 2011, Jan. 2, 2011, pp. 562-567.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20230149607 A1 May 2023 US