Sodium carbonate monohydrate crystallization

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10059600
  • Patent Number
    10,059,600
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, July 19, 2016
    8 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 28, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A process for preparing solid sodium carbonate monohydrate from a solution of sodium carbonate is described.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Conventional techniques for carrying out industrial-scale crystallization of sodium carbonate monohydrate involve evaporative crystallization and the unaltered boiling temperature of a solution of sodium carbonate at the barometric pressure of the plant location, which is dependent on the geographic elevation of the plant.


However, conventional techniques suffer from problems such as poor crystal quality due to impurities present in the feed liquor. As an example, sodium chloride lowers the transition temperature of sodium carbonate monohydrate to anhydrous sodium carbonate. Crystallization of anhydrous sodium carbonate is undesirable because of the negative slope of its temperature-solubility curve, which results in rapid fouling of heat transfer equipment and frequent shutdowns to clean anhydrous sodium carbonate from surfaces of the heat transfer equipment. As such, there is an ongoing need for improving this step to avoid or diminish the aforementioned problems, especially in view of the large scale (e.g., about 100 metric tons (MT) per hour) under which the step is typically carried out.


The present invention addresses the shortcomings associated with conventional technologies by implementing changes in the operating conditions of the sodium carbonate monohydrate crystallizers to substantially reduce or eliminate the potential for precipitation of anhydrous sodium carbonate on heat transfer surfaces. Typically, these changes result in the lowering of the operating pressures and boiling temperatures of the sodium carbonate monohydrate crystallizers to significantly improve plant onstream time and overall plant yield. By employing these changes, it was unexpectedly observed that higher concentrations of impurities, such as sodium chloride, may be tolerated without causing the undesirable transition of sodium carbonate monohydrate to anhydrous sodium carbonate. This methodology also allows for higher impurity concentrations during the crystallization step, thereby desirably minimizing the impurity purge stream volume.


Soda ash (sodium carbonate (Na2CO3)) is presently produced on a commercial scale by three industrial processes: the trona ore process (which uses natural soda ash); the Solvay process (which uses sodium chloride and limestone); and the Hou process (which uses sodium chloride, ammonia, and limestone). Each of these three process routes employs different methods for producing an aqueous solution of sodium carbonate. The Solvay and Hou processes produce sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3) by reaction of carbon dioxide (CO2) with an ammoniated brine solution.

NH3+NaCl+CO2+H2O→NaHCO3+NH4Cl

The sodium bicarbonate is then calcined to produce soda ash.

2NaHCO3(s)→Na2CO3(s)+H2O+CO2


The Solvay process produces a calcium carbonate (CaCO3) waste stream. The Hou process produces ammonium chloride (NH4Cl) as a by-product.


In the trona ore process shown below, mined trona ore (sodium sesquicarbonate (2NaHCO3.Na2CO3.2H2O)) is calcined to crude soda ash, which is then dissolved in water to remove insoluble minerals. Sodium carbonate monohydrate is then crystallized by evaporative crystallization. The isolated crystalline sodium carbonate monohydrate is then dried by air heating to produce anhydrous soda ash.

2NaHCO3·Na2CO3·2H2O(s)→3Na2CO3+CO2+5H2O
Na2CO3+H2O→Na2CO3·H2O(s)
Na2CO3·H2O(s)→Na2CO3(s)+H2O


The trona ore process is the preferred process route to produce soda ash due to its lower raw material and energy costs relative to the Solvay and Hou processes. The trona ore process also produces less waste and byproducts than the other processes.


In addition to the trona ore mining process, soda ash is extracted from trona ore by solution mining. In solution mining, water is injected into the trona ore strata, and sodium carbonate and bicarbonate salts are dissolved into the brine solution. The brine solution is recovered from the trona strata and processed to recover soda ash values. Dissolved sodium bicarbonate in the brine is converted to sodium carbonate by steam stripping carbon dioxide gas. Similar to the trona ore process, sodium carbonate monohydrate is crystallized from the stripped solution by evaporative crystallization, and the resulting crystalline sodium carbonate monohydrate is air dried to produce anhydrous soda ash.

NaHCO3·Na2CO3·2H2O(s)→NaHCO3+Na2CO3+2H2O
2NaHCO3→Na2CO3+CO2+H2O
Na2CO3+H2O →Na2CO3·H2O(s)
Na2CO3·H2O(s)→Na2CO3(s)+H2O


Solution mining offers lower raw material costs than trona ore mining by the avoidance of subsurface ore mining operations. However, solution mining is notably nonselective to soda ash minerals. As a result, any soluble salts such as, but not limited to, salts such as sodium chloride and sulfate that are present in the trona ore strata are co-dissolved into the solution mining brine. In the same manner as sodium sesquicarbonate, sodium chloride and sulfate can dissolve to their solubility limits in the brine. Consequently, the concentrations of these impurities fed to the soda ash plant from solution mining can be significantly higher than from the trona ore mining process, and the potential to undesirably form anhydrous sodium carbonate during the crystallization processes is correspondingly higher.


In an effort to overcome the higher impurity concentrations present in solution mining operations, the inventors made improvements in the design and operation of soda ash crystallization systems that were observed to result in the prevention of the undesirable anhydrous sodium carbonate fouling, to improve yield, and to reduce the volume of the purge stream. Additional and unexpected benefits included the increased production of the crystalline monohydrate product and a significant reduction in power consumption during the crystallization process.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The figures provided herein merely represent typical examples of the present invention and are not intended to otherwise limit the scope of the invention as described herein.



FIG. 1 depicts a phase diagram of a pure sodium carbonate-water system. In this system, the transition temperature of sodium carbonate monohydrate to anhydrous sodium carbonate occurs at approximately 107° C. and at a concentration of 31.4 wt percent Na2CO3.



FIG. 2 depicts the effect of increasing sodium chloride concentration on the transition temperature of sodium carbonate monohydrate to anhydrous sodium carbonate. At a concentration of 5% NaCl, the transition temperature decreases to 106° C. At 10% NaCl, the transition temperature decreases to 104° C. At 15% NaCl, the transition temperature decreases to 102° C., and at 20% NaCl, the transition temperature decreases to 99° C.



FIG. 3 depicts the effect of increasing sodium chloride concentration on the vapor pressure of a sodium carbonate-water system at the sodium carbonate monohydrate to anhydrous sodium carbonate transition temperature. At a concentration of 5% NaCl, the vapor pressure is 1.01 atmospheres (atm) at the transition temperature. At 10% NaCl the vapor pressure is 0.93 atm. At 15% NaCl, the vapor pressure is 0.84 atm, and at 20% NaCl the vapor pressure is 0.73 atm.



FIG. 4 depicts the maximum sodium sulfate concentration in a saturated sodium chloride and sodium carbonate-water system at the sodium carbonate monohydrate to anhydrous sodium carbonate transition temperature. For example, at a concentration of 0% NaCl, the maximum sodium sulfate concentration is 3.4% at a transition temperature of 107° C. and at a vapor pressure of 1.07 atm. At 20% NaCl, maximum sodium sulfate concentration is 1.3% at a transition temperature of 99° C. and a vapor pressure of 0.72 atm.



FIG. 5 depicts the effect of elevation on barometric pressure. For example, barometric pressure decreases from 1.0 atm at sea level to 0.53 atm at an elevation of 5000 meters. This effect exerts a significant influence on the boiling point temperatures of solutions at differing altitudes.



FIG. 6 is a micrograph of sodium carbonate monohydrate crystals prepared as described in Example 2.





SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In order to compensate for the lowering of the sodium carbonate monohydrate-sodium carbonate anhydrous phase transition temperature with increasing sodium chloride concentration, the present invention has modified the design and operation of sodium carbonate evaporative crystallizers to operate at sub-atmospheric pressure. By employment of this method, the boiling temperature of the crystallizer solution is lowered to less than its atmospheric boiling point, and higher concentrations of sodium chloride may be tolerated without the undesirable transition to anhydrous sodium carbonate. In addition, soda ash yield is increased by allowing higher impurity concentrations during crystallization and increased onstream time between cleanings.


An aspect of the present invention is a process for crystallizing sodium carbonate monohydrate in high concentration sodium chloride solutions, which includes the following steps: 1) modifying existing industrial monohydrate crystallization equipment to operate at sub-atmospheric pressures by, for example, but not limited to, adapting the equipment for operation at a lower vapor density and at a higher velocity in the vapor body of the crystallizer; 2) adapting vapor/liquid disengagement equipment for operation at higher vapor velocities to prevent droplet impingement on mechanical vapor recompression (MVR) turbine blades; and 3) adapting MVR equipment to operate at lower suction and discharge pressures.


Another aspect of the present invention is to adapt existing chemical plants to operate with higher amounts of sodium carbonate decahydrate solid crystal. The decahydrate recycle increases the amount of evaporation required in order to obtain a maximum total product yield.


An aspect of the present invention is a method for preparing solid sodium carbonate monohydrate (Na2CO3.1H2O) from a solution comprising or consisting of sodium carbonate and sodium chloride in an aqueous media, the method comprising or consisting of reducing the pressure of a vessel containing the solution such that the boiling point of the solution decreases below the Na2CO3.1H2O to anhydrous Na2CO3transition temperature.


An aspect of the present invention is a method for preparing solid sodium carbonate monohydrate (Na2CO3.1H2O) from a solution comprising or consisting of sodium carbonate, sodium chloride, and sodium sulfate in an aqueous media, the method comprising or consisting of reducing the pressure of a vessel containing the solution such that the boiling point of the solution decreases below the Na2CO3.1H2O to anhydrous Na2CO3 transition temperature.


In an aspect of the invention, the aqueous media is water.


In an aspect of the invention, the sodium chloride is present in an amount greater than 0 but less than 32 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 30 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 28 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 26 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 24 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 22 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 20 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 18 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 16 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 14 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 12 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 10 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 8 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 6 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 4 wt percent, such as, for example, greater than 0 but less than 2 wt percent.


In an aspect of the invention, the sodium chloride is present in an amount between 3 wt percent and 5 wt percent.


In an aspect of the invention, the sodium chloride is present in an amount between 5 wt percent and 10 wt percent.


In an aspect of the invention, the sodium sulfate concentration is present in an amount between 0 and 4 wt percent.


In an aspect of the invention, the solid sodium carbonate monohydrate is in a crystalline form, such as an orthorhombic crystalline form.


In an aspect of the invention, the vessel containing the solution comprising sodium carbonate and sodium chloride in an aqueous media may be any of mechanical vapor recompression (MVR) or multiple effect evaporation crystallizers.


In an aspect of the invention, the pressure levels inside the vessel may vary between 0.10 and 0.99 atmospheres, such as between 0.10 and 0.90 atmospheres, such as between 0.10 and 0.80 atmospheres, such as between 0.10 and 0.70 atmospheres, such as between 0.10 and 0.60 atmospheres, such as between 0.10 and 0.50 atmospheres, such as between 0.10 and 0.40 atmospheres, such as between 0.10 and 0.30 atmospheres.


In an aspect of the invention, the temperature levels inside the vessel may vary between 50 and 110° C., such as between 50 and 105° C., such as between 50 and 100° C., such as 50 and 95° C., such as between 50 and 90° C., such as between 50 and 85° C., such as between 50 and 80° C.


In an aspect of the invention, the pressure of a vessel containing the solution in a multiple effect design is reduced by any of several methods, such as by changing the operating condition of a final surface or barometric condenser by using colder water in the condenser, or boosting the final stage pressure by using, for example, a steam ejector thermocompressor to raise the vapor flow pressure from a new lower pressure value up to the original design conditions. For a mechanical vapor recompression design, the vapor compressor wheel size can be increased to move a greater volumetric vapor flow at a lower pressure, or an existing mechanical vapor compressor can be supplemented by adding a lower pressure fan system to compress lower pressure water vapor up to the inlet condition of the existing compressor. In the multiple effect example, vacuum pump control can be achieved by existing methods of vapor pre-condensers, steam booster ejectors, and modification of the process non-condensable gas venting arrangements to reduce the water condensing loads on the final condensing system. The same strategies can be applied to a mechanical vapor recompression application.


In an aspect of the invention, the amount of solid sodium carbonate monohydrate prepared by this process ranges from historical minimums of as little as 100 MT/day, up to 3,000 MT/day for a single production line, and applied to plants operating more than one crystallizer system with combined operating rates of 10,000 MT/day.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Definitions


As described herein, the phrase “Na2CO3.1H2O to anhydrous Na2CO3transition temperature” is intended to describe the sodium carbonate slurry temperature where the solid phase loses its water of hydration.


As described herein, the name “sodium carbonate monohydrate” is equivalent to Na2CO3.1H2O.


As described herein, the term “monohydrate” refers to sodium carbonate monohydrate.


Sodium carbonate monohydrate is a preferred crystal for preparation by industrial crystallization because the solubility-temperature slope is relatively flat and the Na2CO3.1H2O crystals have regular orthorhombic morphology which results in superior crystal growth and solid/liquid separation.


In contrast, crystallization of anhydrous soda ash is undesirable because of the negative slope of the temperature-solubility curve and the irregular morphology of the crystal. These properties result in fouling of equipment and poor solid-liquid separation. In addition, anhydrous sodium carbonate is unstable: cooling of the crystallizer slurry may cause hydration of Na2CO3 to Na2CO3.1H2O or other hydrates resulting in a loss of water from the solution and the potential for solidification of the contents of the crystallizer system.


In a pure H2O—Na2CO3 system, the transition of Na2CO3.1H2O to anhydrous Na2CO3 occurs at a temperature of approximately 107.8° C. and at a pressure of approximately 1.11 atm. Thus, in a pure H2O—Na2CO3 system, the transition to anhydrous sodium carbonate will not occur when boiling at standard atmospheric pressure (1.0 atm). However, the transition temperature is lowered by the presence of impurities.


Soda ash plants must deal with such impurities (e.g., sodium chloride (NaCl)), which have been steadily increasing over time from trona ore and solution mining brines and from the recycling of solar pond brine resulting from lower quality feedstocks. This increase in sodium chloride concentrations results in reduced soda ash yield and increased operational problems.


Thus, in the presence of NaCl contamination, it is desirable to reduce the boiling temperature by reducing the operating pressure of the system to minimize or prevent the transition of Na2CO3.1H2O to anhydrous Na2CO3.


Commercial sodium carbonate monohydrate crystallizers currently operate at the barometric pressure of each plant location, with the barometric pressure varying with altitude as shown in FIG. 5. For example, a plant located in Green River, Wyo. at an elevation of 1,920 meters has a barometric pressure of 0.79 atm. A plant in Beypazari, Turkey at an elevation of 840 meters has a barometric pressure of 0.90 atm.


Based on these pressures, the maximum sodium chloride concentration in the monohydrate crystallizers at these locations can be estimated using FIG. 3. For example, the maximum sodium chloride content for a monohydrate crystallizer operating at ambient pressure in Green River, Wyo. (0.79 atm) is 16.7% at a boiling temperature of approximately 100.9° C. By comparison, for a plant operating at ambient pressure in Beypazari, Turkey (0.90 atm), the maximum sodium chloride concentration is 11.2% at a boiling temperature of approximately 103.5° C.


The maximum NaCl concentration in a sodium carbonate monohydrate system is 22.9%. At this concentration, the transition of Na2CO3.1H2O to anhydrous Na2CO3 occurs at a temperature of 98.6° C. and at a pressure of 0.69 atmospheres. At higher NaCl concentrations, anhydrous Na2CO3 and NaCl co-crystallize.


Based on the above observations, it was determined to be desirable to operate sodium carbonate monohydrate crystallizers at reduced pressures and temperatures to allow for higher concentrations of sodium chloride without the transition of sodium carbonate monohydrate to anhydrous sodium carbonate. From the above data, an operating pressure of 0.69 atmospheres allowed sodium chloride concentrations of up to 22.9% while crystallizing sodium carbonate monohydrate. Operation under these conditions unexpectedly allowed for the highest crystallization yield of soda ash while minimizing the volume of the crystallizer purge stream.


In addition, operating sodium carbonate monohydrate crystallizers at reduced pressures and temperatures allows for higher concentrations of other impurities, such as sodium sulfate. As indicated in FIG. 4, operating at a pressure of 0.72 atmospheres and at a temperature of 99° C. permits concentrations of 1.3% sodium sulfate and 20% sodium chloride before the transition of sodium carbonate monohydrate to anhydrous sodium carbonate occurs.


EXAMPLES
Example 1 (Conventional and Comparative)

One thousand forty three (1,043) grams of deionized water and 253.4 grams sodium carbonate and 168.5 grams sodium chloride were placed in a 2-liter, baffled, round bottom glass flask. Agitation was started using a bladed stirrer rotating at 1455 rpm. After 475 grams of water were evaporated at a barometric pressure of 751 mm Hg (0.99 atm) and at a temperature of 108° C. over a period of 4 hours, the entire flask contents were emptied into a Büchner funnel and the crystal product was separated from the mother liquor by vacuum filtration. The filter cake had a mass of 175.6 grams and the filtrate weighed 822.5 grams. After drying at 100° C., the filter cake had a mass of 134.9 grams. Microscopic examination of the crystalline product revealed that amorphous anhydrous sodium carbonate was formed. The overall sodium carbonate yield was 67.6% of theoretical.


Example 2

The same procedure was carried out as in Example 1 except for the operating pressure and temperature. The 475 grams of water were evaporated at an absolute pressure of 517 mm Hg (0.68 atm) and at a temperature of 96° C. The filter cake had a mass of 182.6 grams and the filtrate weighed 806.8 grams. After drying at 100° C., the filter cake had a mass of 141.6 grams. Microscopic examination of the crystalline product revealed that orthorhombic sodium carbonate monohydrate was formed. A micrograph of a sample of the product is shown in FIG. 6.


Example 2 is evidence that high purity sodium carbonate monohydrate may be formed from a solution containing significantly high concentrations of sodium chloride. The final liquor contained approximately 11.5 wt % sodium carbonate and 20.3 wt % sodium chloride. The overall sodium carbonate yield was 79.4% of theoretical yield.


All publications cited herein are incorporated by reference in their entireties.


REFERENCES

U.S. Pat. Nos. 1,853,275; 1,911,794; 2,049,249; 2,133,455; 2,193,817; 2,267,136; 2,346,140; 2,388,009; 2,625,384; 2,639,217; 2,770,524; 2,780,520; 2,792,282; 2,798,790; 2,887,360; 2,962,348; 2,970,037; 3,028,215; 3,050,290; 3,113,834; 3,119,655; 3,131,996; 3,184,287; 3,212,848; 3,233,983; 3,244,476; 3,260,567; 3,264,057; 3,273,958; 3,273,959; 3,361,540; 3,395,906; 3,425,795; 3,451,767; 3,455,647; 3,459,497; 3,477,808; 3,479,133; 3,486,844; 3,498,744; 3,528,766; 3,634,999; 3,655,331; 3,656,892; 3,705,790; 3,717,698; 3,725,014; 3,796,794; 3,819,805; 3,836,628; 3,838,189; 3,845,119; 3,869,538; 3,870,780; 3,904,733; 3,933,977; 3,953,073; 3,956,457; 3,991,160; 4,019,872; 4,021,525; 4,021,526; 4,021,527; 4,022,867; 4,022,868; 4,039,617; 4,039,618; 4,044,097; 4,083,939; 4,116,757; 4,151,261; 4,160,812; 4,183,901; 4,202,667; 4,286,967; 4,288,419; 4,291,002; 4,299,799; 4,341,744; 4,344,650; 4,374,102; 4,375,454; 4,401,635; 4,472,280; 4,498,706; 4,519,806; 4,738,836; 4,781,899; 4,814,151; 4,869,882; 5,043,149; 5,192,164; 5,205,493; 5,238,664; 5,262,134; 5,283,054; 5,575,922; 5,609,838; 5,618,504; 5,624,647; 5,759,507; 5,766,270; 5,783,159; 5,911,959; 5,955,043; 5,989,505; 6,022,516; 6,207,123; 6,228,335; 6,251,346; 6,284,005; 6,322,767; 6,428,759; 6,576,206; 6,589,497; 6,609,761; 6,667,021; 7,018,594; 7,128,886; 7,255,841; 7,410,627; 7,507,388; 7,611,208; 7,638,109; 7,645,435; 8,057,765; 8,454,840; 8,603,192; 8,678,513; 8,771,622; 8,858,902; 8,899,691.

Claims
  • 1. A method for preparing solid sodium carbonate monohydrate (Na2CO3.1H2O), the method comprising: reducing the pressure of a vessel containing a solution comprising sodium carbonate and sodium chloride in an aqueous media to between 0.1 and 0.80 atmospheres with the result that the boiling point of the solution decreases below the Na2CO3.1H2O to anhydrous Na2CO3 transition temperature;evaporating at least a portion of the aqueous media at the reduced pressure; andisolating the sodium carbonate monohydrate in solid form.
  • 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the aqueous media is water.
  • 3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sodium chloride is present in an amount greater than 0 but less than 32 wt percent.
  • 4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sodium chloride is present in an amount between 5 wt percent and 10 wt percent.
  • 5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sodium chloride is present in an amount between 3 wt percent and 5 wt percent.
  • 6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the sodium sulfate is present in an amount greater than 0 but less than 4 wt percent.
  • 7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the solid sodium carbonate monohydrate is in a crystalline form.
  • 8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the crystalline form is orthorhombic.
  • 9. The method according to claim 1, wherein the vessel is a mechanical vapor recompression (MVR) crystallizer or a multiple effect evaporation crystallizer.
  • 10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the vessel is at a temperature in the range of 50 to 110° C.
US Referenced Citations (132)
Number Name Date Kind
1853275 Houghton et al. Apr 1932 A
1911794 Britton May 1933 A
2049249 Cunningham Jul 1936 A
2133455 Keene Oct 1938 A
2193817 Houghton Mar 1940 A
2267136 Robertson Dec 1941 A
2346140 Pike Apr 1944 A
2388009 Pike Oct 1945 A
2625384 Pike et al. Jan 1953 A
2639217 Pike May 1953 A
2770524 Seaton et al. Nov 1956 A
2780520 Pike et al. Feb 1957 A
2792282 Pike et al. May 1957 A
2798790 Pike et al. Jul 1957 A
2887360 Hoekje May 1959 A
2962348 Seglin et al. Nov 1960 A
2970037 Caldwell et al. Jan 1961 A
3028215 Frint Apr 1962 A
3050290 Caldwell et al. Aug 1962 A
3113834 Beecher et al. Dec 1963 A
3119655 Frint et al. Jan 1964 A
3131996 Seglin et al. May 1964 A
3184287 Gancy May 1965 A
3212848 Tasiaux Oct 1965 A
3233983 Bauer et al. Feb 1966 A
3244476 Smith Apr 1966 A
3260567 Hellmers et al. Jul 1966 A
3264057 Miller Aug 1966 A
3273958 Peverley Sep 1966 A
3273959 Miller Sep 1966 A
3361540 Peverley et al. Jan 1968 A
3395906 Wiseman et al. Aug 1968 A
3425795 Howard et al. Feb 1969 A
3451767 Saeman et al. Jun 1969 A
3455647 Gloster Jul 1969 A
3459497 Coglaiti, Jr. et al. Aug 1969 A
3477808 Hellmers Nov 1969 A
3479133 Warzel Nov 1969 A
3486844 Tabler Dec 1969 A
3498744 Frint et al. Mar 1970 A
3528766 Coglaiti, Jr. et al. Sep 1970 A
3634999 Howard et al. Jan 1972 A
3655331 Seglin et al. Apr 1972 A
3656892 Bourne et al. Apr 1972 A
3705790 Garofano et al. Dec 1972 A
3717698 Ilardi Feb 1973 A
3725014 Poncha et al. Apr 1973 A
3796794 Ilardi Mar 1974 A
3819805 Graves et al. Jun 1974 A
3836628 Ilardi et al. Sep 1974 A
3838189 Sopchak et al. Sep 1974 A
3845119 Duke et al. Oct 1974 A
3869538 Sproul et al. Mar 1975 A
3870780 Guptill Mar 1975 A
3904733 Gancy et al. Sep 1975 A
3933977 Ilardi et al. Jan 1976 A
3953073 Kube Apr 1976 A
3956457 Port et al. May 1976 A
3991160 Gancy et al. Nov 1976 A
4019872 Walden Apr 1977 A
4021525 Poncha May 1977 A
4021526 Gancy et al. May 1977 A
4021527 Baadsgaard May 1977 A
4022867 Gancy et al. May 1977 A
4022868 Poncha May 1977 A
4039617 Kuo Aug 1977 A
4039618 Gancy et al. Aug 1977 A
4044097 Gancy et al. Aug 1977 A
4083939 Lobunez et al. Apr 1978 A
4116757 Garofano et al. Sep 1978 A
4151261 Poncha et al. Apr 1979 A
4160812 Conroy et al. Jul 1979 A
4183901 Ilardi et al. Jan 1980 A
4202667 Conroy et al. May 1980 A
4286967 Booth, Jr. et al. Sep 1981 A
4288419 Copenhafer et al. Sep 1981 A
4291002 Arnold et al. Sep 1981 A
4299799 Ilardi et al. Nov 1981 A
4341744 Brison et al. Jul 1982 A
4344650 Pinsky et al. Aug 1982 A
4374102 Connelly et al. Feb 1983 A
4375454 Imperto Mar 1983 A
4401635 Frint Aug 1983 A
4472280 Keeney Sep 1984 A
4498706 Ilardi et al. Feb 1985 A
4519806 Copenhafer et al. May 1985 A
4738836 Poncha et al. Apr 1988 A
4781899 Rauh et al. Nov 1988 A
4814151 Benke Mar 1989 A
4869882 Dome et al. Sep 1989 A
5043149 Frint et al. Aug 1991 A
5192164 Frint et al. Mar 1993 A
5205493 Adler et al. Apr 1993 A
5238664 Frint et al. Aug 1993 A
5262134 Frint et al. Nov 1993 A
5283054 Copenhafer et al. Feb 1994 A
5575922 Green et al. Nov 1996 A
5609838 Neuman et al. Mar 1997 A
5618504 Delling et al. Apr 1997 A
5624647 Zolotoochin et al. Apr 1997 A
5759507 Delling et al. Jun 1998 A
5766270 Neuman et al. Jun 1998 A
5783159 Aldinger Jul 1998 A
5911959 Wold et al. Jun 1999 A
5955043 Neuman et al. Sep 1999 A
5989505 Zolotoochin et al. Nov 1999 A
6022516 Copenhafer et al. Feb 2000 A
6207123 Tanaka et al. Mar 2001 B1
6228335 Copenhafer et al. May 2001 B1
6251346 Neuman et al. Jun 2001 B1
6284005 Hazen et al. Sep 2001 B1
6322767 Neuman et al. Nov 2001 B1
6428759 Smith et al. Aug 2002 B1
6576206 Copenhafer et al. Jun 2003 B2
6589497 Smith Jul 2003 B2
6609761 Ramey et al. Aug 2003 B1
6667021 Braman et al. Dec 2003 B2
7018594 Copenhafer Mar 2006 B2
7128886 Ramey et al. Oct 2006 B2
7255841 Kurtz Aug 2007 B2
7410627 Ramey et al. Aug 2008 B2
7507388 Ceylan et al. Mar 2009 B2
7611208 Day et al. Nov 2009 B2
7638109 Copenhafer Dec 2009 B2
7645435 Braman et al. Jan 2010 B2
8057765 Day et al. Nov 2011 B2
8454840 Copenhafer Jun 2013 B1
8603192 Rittof et al. Dec 2013 B2
8678513 Hughes et al. Mar 2014 B2
8771622 Hughes et al. Jul 2014 B2
8858902 Copenhafer Oct 2014 B2
8899691 Day et al. Dec 2014 B2
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20170029283 A1 Feb 2017 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
62199967 Jul 2015 US