1. Field of the Invention
The present application relates generally to rotor systems, and more specifically, to coaxial rotor systems.
2. Description of Related Art
Rotor systems are well known in the art for effectively creating lift for an aircraft. Conventional rotor systems include one or more rotor blades operably associated with a yoke, and in some embodiments, include two rotor assemblies coaxially aligned. For example,
Considerable shortcoming remains with conventional rotor systems configured with stiff in-plane and out-of-plane rotation. For example, a rotor system that is configured to have a stiff in-plane rotation greatly reduces the ability of the rotor system to compensate for in-plane loads exerted on the yoke via the rotor blades during flight, e.g., lead/lag movement of the rotor blade.
Although the foregoing developments in rotor systems represent great strides in the art, many shortcomings remain.
The novel features believed characteristic of the embodiments of the present application are set forth in the appended claims. However, the embodiments themselves, as well as a preferred mode of use, and further objectives and advantages thereof, will best be understood by reference to the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
While the system and method of the present application is susceptible to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and are herein described in detail. It should be understood, however, that the description herein of specific embodiments is not intended to limit the invention to the particular embodiment disclosed, but on the contrary, the intention is to cover all modifications, equivalents, and alternatives falling within the spirit and scope of the process of the present application as defined by the appended claims.
Illustrative embodiments of the apparatus and method are provided below. It will of course be appreciated that in the development of any actual embodiment, numerous implementation-specific decisions will be made to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with system-related and business-related constraints, which will vary from one implementation to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
The system and method of the present application overcome the above-listed problems commonly associated with conventional dampers. Specifically, the system includes a rotor assembly having a yoke operably associated with a rotor blade. The yoke includes a first device and a second device that attach the rotor blade to the yoke. The first device is configured to allow transverse movement of the rotor blade about a chord axis and rotational movement about a pitch-change axis. The second device is configured to allow rotational movement of the rotor blade solely about the pitch-change axis. The method includes rotating rotor assembly about a first plane of rotation, while retaining a relatively stiff out-of-plane rotation and a relatively soft in-plane rotation during flight. The system provides significant advantages and a further detailed description of these features are provided below and illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The system and method of the present application will be understood, both as to its structure and operation, from the accompanying drawings, taken in conjunction with the accompanying description. Several embodiments of the system are presented herein. It should be understood that various components, parts, and features of the different embodiments may be combined together and/or interchanged with one another, all of which are within the scope of the present application, even though not all variations and particular embodiments are shown in the drawings. It should also be understood that the mixing and matching of features, elements, and/or functions between various embodiments is expressly contemplated herein so that one of ordinary skill in the art would appreciate from this disclosure that the features, elements, and/or functions of one embodiment may be incorporated into another embodiment as appropriate, unless described otherwise.
Referring now to the drawings wherein like reference characters identify corresponding or similar elements throughout the several views,
Although shown associated with a helicopter, it will be appreciated that the damper system of the present application could also be utilized with different types of rotary aircraft and vehicles. For example,
Tiltrotor aircraft 401 includes rotor assemblies 413a and 413b that are carried by wings 415a and 415b, and are disposed at end portions 416a and 416b of wings 415a and 415b, respectively. Tilt rotor assemblies 413a and 413b include nacelles 420a and 420b, which carry the engines and transmissions of tilt rotor aircraft 401, as well as, rotor proprotors 419a and 419b on forward ends 421a and 421b of tilt rotor assemblies 413a and 413b, respectively. Tilt rotor assemblies 413a and 413b move or rotate relative to wing members 415a and 415b between a helicopter mode in which tilt rotor assemblies 413a and 413b are tilted upward, such that tilt rotor aircraft 401 flies like a conventional helicopter; and an airplane mode in which tilt rotor assemblies 413a and 413b are tilted forward, such that tilt rotor aircraft 401 flies like a conventional propeller driven aircraft.
Rotary aircraft 501 is substantially similar in form and function to aircraft 301 except, for example, two coaxially rotor assemblies 503 and 505 in lieu of a single rotor assembly. In the contemplated embodiment, the two rotor assemblies counter-rotate relative to each other and are driven by two separate rotor shafts operably associated with a common transmission. Thus, it should be appreciated that the features discussed herein are operably associated with rotor systems having one or more rotor assemblies.
As depicted, the axes associated with rotor blade 307 are a pitch-change axis 609 that runs along the longitudinal length of the blade, a chord axis 611 extending perpendicular to the pitch-change axis 609, and a beam axis 613 that extend parallel to the rotor mast. In the contemplated embodiment, the rotor system is configured to allow relative transverse movement of the rotor blade about chord axis 611, as indicated by arrow A, and relative rotational movement about pitch-change axis 609, as indicated by arrow B. With respect to beam axis 613, the rotor system is configured to restrict relative movement about this axis so as to prevent collision between the two coaxially aligned rotating blades.
Rotor system 701 includes a mast 703 rotatably attached to a transmission (not shown) and to a yoke 705. In the contemplated embodiment, yoke 705 includes an upper arm 707 and a lower arm 709. Positioned between the arms are two devices, namely, first device 711 aligned with a second device 713 about the pitch-change axis. The devices are configured to attach a rotor blade 715 to yoke 705 and also configured to dampen forces exerted against the yoke via the rotor blade.
As depicted in
Thus, in the contemplated embodiment, cuff 719 is free to rotate around arms 707 and 709 about the pitch-change axis and is configured to attach rotor blade 715 to yoke 705 via devices 711 and 713.
In the contemplated embodiment, first device 711 is a damper, preferably a lead/lag damper that compensates for lead/lag and/or other in-plane forces. In
In the contemplated embodiment, second device 713 is a damper, preferably a centrifugal damper that compensates for centrifugal forces exerted on the yoke via the rotor blade. It should be understood that device 713 restricts relative movement along all axes except for rotational movement along the pitch-change axis.
One unique feature believed characteristic of the present application is utilizing the first and second devices to restrict movement of the rotor blade during flight. Thus, the first and second devices are configured to allow soft in-plane rotation and configured to restrict out-of-plane movement. This feature overcomes problems commonly associate with conventional stiff in-plane/out-of-plane designs that experience significant in-plane loads.
Another unique feature believed characteristic of the present application is pivoting the rotor system during flight, which is illustrated in
Aircraft 1001 is further provided with a pitch system 1003 having a hydraulic actuator 1005 and a link system 1007 operably associated with the aircraft transmission 1009. During flight, pitch system 1003 can be activated to pitch the orientation of transmission 1009, which in turn pitches rotor system 1011. In the contemplated embodiment, pitch system 1003 can be with manually or autonomously controlled.
It is apparent that a system and method with significant advantages has been described and illustrated. The particular embodiments disclosed above are illustrative only, as the embodiments may be modified and practiced in different but equivalent manners apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of the teachings herein. It is therefore evident that the particular embodiments disclosed above may be altered or modified, and all such variations are considered within the scope and spirit of the application. Accordingly, the protection sought herein is as set forth in the description. Although the present embodiments are shown above, they are not limited to just these embodiments, but are amenable to various changes and modifications without departing from the spirit thereof.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3554467 | Yowell | Jan 1971 | A |
3942910 | Snyder | Mar 1976 | A |
3999726 | Carlson et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4257738 | Schwarz et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4257739 | Covington | Mar 1981 | A |
4342540 | Lovera | Aug 1982 | A |
4352632 | Schwarz et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4473199 | Magill | Sep 1984 | A |
4512717 | Pancotti et al. | Apr 1985 | A |
4516909 | Caramaschi et al. | May 1985 | A |
4547127 | Frommlet et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4676720 | Niwa | Jun 1987 | A |
5059094 | Robinson et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5562416 | Schmaling et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
7252479 | Bagai | Aug 2007 | B2 |
8231346 | Stamps et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8444382 | Stamps et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8857581 | Stamps et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8956117 | Stamps et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
20110027083 | Stamps | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110274548 | Stamps | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20130084183 | Yuce et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2827320 | Oct 1980 | DE |
2827320 | Oct 1980 | DE |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report dated Jun. 19, 2013 in related EP App. No. 13166910.3. |
Office Action dated Oct. 18, 2013 in related EP App. No. 13166910.3. |
Office Action dated Feb. 26, 2014 in related EP App. No. 13166910.3. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Mar. 7, 2016 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,832. |
Amendment dated Jun. 7, 2016 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,832. |
Non-Final Rejection dated Sep. 9, 2016 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,832. |
Amendment dated Dec. 9, 2016 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,832. |
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 18, 2017 from corresponding U.S. Appl. No. 13/804,832. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170259916 A1 | Sep 2017 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13804832 | Mar 2013 | US |
Child | 15603019 | US |