SOFT MAGNETIC ALLOY

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20180096765
  • Publication Number
    20180096765
  • Date Filed
    September 28, 2017
    7 years ago
  • Date Published
    April 05, 2018
    6 years ago
Abstract
A soft magnetic alloy includes a main component of Fe. The soft magnetic alloy includes a Fe composition network phase where regions whose Fe content is larger than an average composition of the soft magnetic alloy are linked. The Fe composition network phase contains Fe content maximum points that are locally higher than their surroundings in 400,000/μm3 or more. A ratio of Fe content maximum points whose coordination number is 1 or more and 5 or less is 80% or more and 100% or less with respect to all of the Fe content maximum points.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a soft magnetic alloy.


2. Description of the Related Art

Low power consumption and high efficiency have been demanded in electronic, information, communication equipment, and the like. Moreover, the above demands are becoming stronger for a low carbon society. Thus, reduction in energy loss and improvement in power supply efficiency are also required for power supply circuits of electronic, information, communication equipment, and the like. Then, improvement in permeability and reduction in core loss (magnetic core loss) are required for the magnetic core of the ceramic element used in the power supply circuit. If the core loss is reduced, the loss of power energy is reduced, and high efficiency and energy saving are achieved.


Patent Document 1 discloses that a soft magnetic alloy powder having a large permeability and a small core loss and suitable for magnetic cores is obtained by changing the particle shape of the powder. However, magnetic cores having a larger permeability and a smaller core loss are required now.


Patent Document 1: JP 2000-30924 A


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

As a method of reducing the core loss of the magnetic core, it is conceivable to reduce coercivity of a magnetic material constituting the magnetic core.


It is an object of the invention to provide a soft magnetic alloy having a low coercivity and a high permeability.


To achieve the above object, the soft magnetic alloy according to the present invention is a soft magnetic alloy comprising a main component of Fe, wherein


the soft magnetic alloy comprises a Fe composition network phase where regions whose Fe content is larger than an average composition of the soft magnetic alloy are linked;


the Fe composition network phase contains Fe content maximum points that are locally higher than their surroundings in 400,000/μm3 or more; and


a ratio of Fe content maximum points whose coordination number is 1 or more and 5 or less is 80% or more and 100% or less with respect to all of the Fe content maximum points.


The soft magnetic alloy according to the present invention comprises the Fe composition network phase, and thus has a low coercivity and a high permeability.


In the soft magnetic alloy according to the present invention, a ratio of Fe content maximum points whose coordination number is 2 or more and 4 or less is preferably 70% or more and 90% or less with respect to all of the Fe content maximum points.


In the soft magnetic alloy according to the present invention, a volume ratio of the Fe composition network phase is preferably 25 vol % or more and 50 vol % or less with respect to the entire soft magnetic alloy.


In the soft magnetic alloy according to the present invention, a volume ratio of the Fe composition network phase is preferably 30 vol % or more and 40 vol % or less with respect to the entire soft magnetic alloy.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a photograph of a Fe concentration distribution of a soft magnetic alloy according to an embodiment of the present invention observed using a three-dimensional atom probe.



FIG. 2 is a photograph of a network structure model owned by a soft magnetic alloy according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a step of searching maximum points.



FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a state where line segments linking all of the maximum points are formed.



FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a divided state of a region whose Fe content is more than an average value and a region whose Fe content is an average value or less.



FIG. 6 is a schematic view of a deleted state of line segments passing through the region whose Fe content is an average value or less.



FIG. 7 is a schematic view of a state where the longest line segment of line segments forming a triangle is deleted when the triangle contains no region whose Fe content is an average value or less.



FIG. 8 is a schematic view of a single roll method.



FIG. 9 is a graph showing a relation between a coordination number and a maximum-point number ratio of each composition.





DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Hereinafter, an embodiment of the present invention will be described.


A soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment is a soft magnetic alloy whose main component is Fe. Specifically, “main component is Fe” means a soft magnetic alloy whose Fe content is 65 atom % or more with respect to the entire soft magnetic alloy.


Except that main component is Fe, the soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment has any composition. The soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment may be a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy, a Fe-M′-B—C based soft magnetic alloy, or another soft magnetic alloy.


In the following description, the entire soft magnetic alloy is considered to be 100 atom % if there is no description of parameter with respect to content ratio of each element of the soft magnetic alloy.


When a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy is used, the following formulae are preferably satisfied if the Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy has a composition expressed by FeaCubMcSidBeCf. When the following formulae are satisfied, the number of Fe content maximum points mentioned below tends to be large, a favorable Fe composition network phase tends to be obtained easily, and a soft magnetic alloy having a low coercivity and a high permeability tends to be obtained easily. Incidentally, a soft magnetic alloy composed of the following compositions is made of comparatively inexpensive raw materials. The Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy of the present application also includes a soft magnetic alloy with f=0, that is, failing to contain C.






a+b+c+d+e+f=100





0.1≦b≦3.0





1.0≦c≦10.0





11.5≦d≦17.5





7.0≦e≦13.0





0.0≦f≦4.0


A Cu content (b) is preferably 0.1 to 3.0 atom %, more preferably 0.5 to 1.5 atom %. The smaller a Cu content is, the more easily a ribbon composed of the soft magnetic alloy tends to be prepared by a single roll method mentioned below.


M is a transition metal element other than Cu. M is preferably one or more selected from a group of Nb, Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Ta, and Mo. Preferably, M contains Nb.


A M content (c) is preferably 1.0 to 10.0 atom %, more preferably 3.0 to 5.0 atom %.


A Si content (d) is preferably 11.5 to 17.5 atom %, more preferably 13.5 to 15.5 atom %.


AB content (e) is preferably 7.0 to 13.0 atom %, more preferably 9.0 to 11.0 atom %.


A C content (f) is preferably 0.0 to 4.0 atom %. Amorphousness is improved by addition of C.


Incidentally, Fe is, so to speak, a remaining part of the Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment.


When the Fe-M′-B—C based soft magnetic alloy is used, the following formulae are preferably satisfied if the Fe-M′-B—C based soft magnetic alloy has a composition expressed by FeαM′βBγCΩ. When the following formulae are satisfied, the number of Fe content maximum points mentioned below tends to be large, a favorable Fe composition network phase tends to be obtained easily, and a soft magnetic alloy having a low coercivity and a high permeability tends to be obtained easily. Incidentally, a soft magnetic alloy composed of the following compositions is made of comparatively inexpensive raw materials. The Fe-M′-B—C based soft magnetic alloy of the present application also includes a soft magnetic alloy with Ω=0, that is, failing to contain C.





α+β+γ+Ω=100





1.0≦β≦14.1





2.0≦γ≦20.0





0.0≦Ω≦4.0


M′ is a transition metal element. M′ is preferably one or more element selected from a group of Nb, Cu, Cr, Zr, and Hf. M′ is more preferably one or more element selected from a group of Nb, Cu, Zr, and Hf. M′ most preferably contains one or more element selected from a group of Nb, Zr, and Hf.


A M′ content (β) is preferably 1.0 to 14.1 atom %, more preferably 7.0 to 10.1 atom %.


A Cu content in M′ is preferably 0.0 to 2.0 atom %, more preferably 0.1 to 1.0 atom %, provided that an entire soft magnetic alloy is 100 atom %. When a M′ content is less than 7.0 atom %, however, failing to contain Cu may be preferable.


A B content (γ) is preferably 2.0 to 20.0 atom %. When M′ contains Nb, a B content (γ) is preferably 4.5 to 18.0 atom %. When M′ contains Zr and/or Hf, a B content (γ) is preferably 2.0 to 8.0 atom %. The smaller a B content is, the further amorphousness tends to deteriorate. The larger a B content is, the further the number of maximum points mentioned below tends to decrease.


A C content (Ω) is preferably 0.0 to 4.0 atom %, more preferably 0.1 to 3.0 atom %. Amorphousness is improved by addition of C. The larger a C content is, the further the number of maximum points mentioned below tends to decrease.


Another soft magnetic alloy may be a Fe-M″-B—P—C based soft magnetic alloy, a Fe—Si—P—B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy, or the like.


When a Fe-M″-B—P—C based soft magnetic alloy is used, the following formulae are preferably satisfied if the Fe-M″-B—P—C based soft magnetic alloy has a composition expressed by FevM″wBxPyCz. When the following formulae are satisfied, the number of maximum points mentioned below tends to increase, a favorable Fe composition network phase tends to be obtained easily, and a soft magnetic alloy having a low coercivity and a high permeability tends to be obtained easily. Incidentally, a soft magnetic alloy composed of the following compositions is made of comparatively inexpensive raw materials. The Fe-M″-B—P—C based soft magnetic alloy of the present application also includes a soft magnetic alloy with z=0, that is, failing to contain C.






v+w+x+y+z=100





3.2≦w≦15.5





2.8≦x≦13.0





0.1≦y≦3.0





0.0≦z≦2.0


M″ is a transition metal element. M″ is preferably one or more elements selected from a group of Nb, Cu, Cr, Zr, and Hf M″ preferably contains Nb.


When a Fe—Si—P—B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy is used, the following formulae are preferably satisfied if the Fe—Si—P—B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy has a composition expressed by FevSiw1Pw2BxCuyCz. When the following formulae are satisfied, the number of maximum points mentioned below tends to increase, a favorable Fe composition network phase tends to be obtained easily, and a soft magnetic alloy having a low coercivity and a high permeability tends to be obtained easily. Incidentally, a soft magnetic alloy composed of the following compositions is made of comparatively inexpensive raw materials. The Fe—Si—P—B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy of the present application also includes a soft magnetic alloy with w1=0 or w2=0 (i.e., Si or P is not contained). The Fe—Si—P—B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy of the present application also includes a soft magnetic alloy with z=0 (i.e., C is not contained).






v+w1+w2+x+y+z=100





0.0≦w1≦8.0





0.0≦w2≦8.0





3.0≦w1+w2≦11.0





5.0≦x≦13.0





0.1≦y≦0.7





0.0≦z≦4.0


Here, the Fe composition network phase owned by the soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment will be described.


The Fe composition network phase is a phase whose Fe content is higher than an average composition of the soft magnetic alloy. When observing a Fe concentration distribution of the soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment using a three-dimensional atom probe (hereinafter also referred to as a 3DAP) with a thickness of 5 nm, it can be observed that portions having a high Fe content are distributed in network as shown in FIG. 1. FIG. 2 is a schematic view obtained by three-dimensionalizing this distribution. Incidentally, FIG. 1 is an observation result of Sample No. 39 in Examples mentioned below using a 3DAP.


In conventional soft magnetic alloys containing Fe, a plurality of portions having a high Fe content respectively has a spherical shape or an approximately spherical shape and exists at random via portions having a low Fe content. The soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment is characterized in that portions having a high Fe content are linked in network and distributed as shown in FIG. 2.


An aspect of the Fe composition network phase can be quantified by measuring the number of maximum points and coordination number of the maximum points of the Fe composition network phase.


The maximum point of the Fe composition network phase is a Fe content point that is locally higher than its surroundings. The coordination number of the maximum point is the number of the other maximum points linking to a maximum point via the Fe composition network phase.


Hereinafter, an analysis procedure of the Fe composition network phase according to the present embodiment will be described using the figures, and a maximum point, a coordination number of the maximum point, and a calculation method thereof will be thereby described.


First, a cube whose length of one side is 40 nm is determined as a measurement range, and this cube is divided into cubic grids whose length of one side is 1 nm. That is, 64,000 grids (40×40×40=64000) exist in one measurement range.


Next, a Fe content in each grid is evaluated. Then, a Fe content average value (hereinafter also referred to as a threshold value) in all of the grids is calculated. The Fe content average value is a value substantially equivalent to a value calculated from an average composition of each soft magnetic alloy.


Next, a grid whose Fe content exceeds the threshold value and is higher than that of all adjacent unit grids is determined as a maximum point. FIG. 3 shows a model showing a step of searching the maximum points. Numbers written inside each grid 10 represent a Fe content in each grid. Maximum points 10a are determined as a grid whose Fe content is equal to or larger than Fe contents of all adjacent grids 10b.



FIG. 3 shows eight adjacent grids 10b with respect to a single maximum point 10a, but in fact nine adjacent grids 10b also exist respectively front and back the maximum points 10a of FIG. 3. That is, 26 adjacent grids 10b exist with respect to the single maximum point 10a.


With respect to grids 10 located at the end of the measurement range, grids whose Fe content is zero are considered to exist outside the measurement range.


Next, as shown in FIG. 4, line segments linking all of the maximum points 10a contained in the measurement range are drawn. When drawing the line segments, centers of each grid are connected to each other. Incidentally, the maximum points 10a are represented as circles for convenience of description in FIG. 4 to FIG. 7. Numbers written inside the circles represent a Fe content.


Next, as shown in FIG. 5, the measurement range is divided into a region 20a whose Fe content is higher than a threshold value (=Fe composition network phase) and a region 20b whose Fe content is a threshold value or less. Then, as shown in FIG. 6, line segments passing through the region 20b are deleted.


Next, as shown in FIG. 7, when no region 20b exists inside a triangle formed by the line segments, the longest line segment of three line segments constituting this triangle is deleted. Finally, when maximum points exist in adjacent grids, line segments linking the maximum points are deleted.


Then, the number of line segments extending from each maximum point 10a is determined as a coordination number of each maximum point 10a. In FIG. 7, for example, a maximum point 10a1 whose Fe content is 50 has a coordination number of 4, and a maximum point 10a2 whose Fe content is 41 has a coordination number of 2.


When a grid existing on an outermost surface within a measurement range of 40 nm×40 nm×40 nm shows a maximum point, this maximum point is excluded from calculation of a ratio of maximum points whose coordination number is within a predetermined range mentioned below.


Incidentally, the Fe composition network phase also includes a maximum point whose coordination number is zero and a region whose Fe content is higher than a threshold value existing in the surroundings of a maximum point whose coordination number is zero.


The accuracy of calculation results can be sufficiently highly improved by conducting the above-mentioned measurement several times in respectively different measurement ranges. The above-mentioned measurement is preferably conducted three times or more in respectively different measurement ranges.


The Fe composition network phase owned by the soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment contains Fe content maximum points that are locally higher than their surroundings in 400,000/μm3 or more, and a ratio of Fe content maximum points whose coordination number is 1 or more and 5 or less is 80% or more and 100% or less with respect to all of the Fe content maximum points. Incidentally, a denominator of the number of the maximum points is a volume of an entire measurement range, and is a total volume of the region 20a whose Fe content is higher than a threshold value and the region 20b whose Fe content is a threshold value or less.


The soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment comprises a Fe composition network phase where the number of maximum points and a ratio of maximum points whose coordination number is 1 or more and 5 or less are within the above ranges. It is thus possible to obtain a soft magnetic alloy having a low coercivity and a high permeability and excelling in soft magnetic properties particularly in high frequencies.


Preferably, a ratio of Fe content maximum points whose coordination number is 2 or more and 4 or less is 70% or more and 90% or less with respect to all of the Fe content maximum points.


Moreover, a volume ratio of the Fe composition network phase (a volume ratio of the region 20a whose Fe content is higher than a threshold value to a total of the region 20a whose Fe content is higher than a threshold value and the region 20b whose Fe content is a threshold value or less) is preferably 25 vol % or more and 50 vol % or less, more preferably 30 vol % or more and 40 vol % or less, with respect to the entire soft magnetic alloy.


When comparing a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy with a Fe-M′-B—C based soft magnetic alloy, the Fe-M′-B—C based soft magnetic alloy tends to have a higher number of maximum points and also have a larger coordination number.


When comparing a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy with a Fe-M′-B—C based soft magnetic alloy, the Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based soft magnetic alloy tends to have a lower coercivity and a higher permeability than those of the Fe-M′-B—C based soft magnetic alloy.


Hereinafter, a manufacturing method of the soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment will be described.


The soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment is manufactured by any method. For example, a ribbon of the soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment is manufactured by a single roll method.


In the single roll method, first, pure metals of metal elements contained in a soft magnetic alloy finally obtained are prepared and weighed so that a composition identical to that of the soft magnetic alloy finally obtained is obtained. Then, the pure metals of each metal element are molten and mixed, and a base alloy is prepared. Incidentally, the pure metals are molten by any method. For example, the pure metals are molten by high-frequency heating after a chamber is evacuated. Incidentally, the base alloy and the soft magnetic alloy finally obtained normally have the same composition.


Next, the prepared base alloy is heated and molten, and a molten metal is obtained. The molten metal has any temperature, and may have a temperature of 1200 to 1500° C., for example.



FIG. 8 shows a schematic view of an apparatus used for the single roll method. In the single roll method according to the present embodiment, a molten metal 32 is supplied by being sprayed from a nozzle 31 against a roll 33 rotating toward the direction of the arrow in a chamber 35, and a ribbon 34 is thus manufactured toward the rotating direction of the roll 33. Incidentally, the roll 33 is made of any material, such as a roll composed of Cu.


In the single roll method, the thickness of the ribbon to be obtained can be mainly controlled by controlling a rotating speed of the roll 33, but can be also controlled by controlling a distance between the nozzle 31 and the roll 33, a temperature of the molten metal, or the like. The ribbon has any thickness, and may have a thickness of 15 to 30 μm, for example.


The ribbon is preferably amorphous before a heat treatment mentioned below. The amorphous ribbon undergoes a heat treatment mentioned below, and the above-mentioned favorable Fe composition network phase can be thereby obtained.


Incidentally, whether the ribbon of the soft magnetic alloy before a heat treatment is amorphous or not is confirmed by any method. Here, the fact that the ribbon is amorphous means that the ribbon contains no crystals. For example, the existence of crystals whose particle size is about 0.01 to 10 μm can be confirmed by a normal X-ray diffraction measurement. When crystals exist in the above amorphous phase but their volume ratio is small, a normal X-ray diffraction measurement can determine that no crystals exist. In this case, for example, the existence of crystals can be confirmed by obtaining a restricted visual field diffraction image, a nano beam diffraction image, a bright field image, or a high resolution image of a sample thinned by ion milling using a transmission electron microscope. When using a restricted visual field diffraction image or a nano beam diffraction image, with respect to diffraction pattern, a ring-shaped diffraction is formed in case of being amorphous, and diffraction spots due to crystal structure are formed in case of being non-amorphous. When using a bright field image or a high resolution image, whether the existence of crystals can be confirmed by visually observing the image with a magnification of 1.00×105 to 3.00×105. In the present specification, it is considered that “crystals exist” if crystals can be confirmed to exist by a normal X-ray diffraction measurement, and it is considered that “microcrystals exist” if crystals cannot be confirmed to exist by a normal X-ray diffraction measurement but can be confirmed to exist by obtaining a restricted visual field diffraction image, a nano beam diffraction image, a bright field image, or a high resolution image of a sample thinned by ion milling using a transmission electron microscope.


Here, the present inventors have found that when a temperature of the roll 33 and a vapor pressure in the chamber 35 are controlled appropriately, a ribbon of a soft magnetic alloy before a heat treatment becomes amorphous easily, and a favorable Fe composition network phase is easily obtained after the heat treatment. Specifically, the present inventors have found that a ribbon of a soft magnetic alloy becomes amorphous easily by setting a temperature of the roll 33 to 50 to 70° C., preferably 70° C., and setting a vapor pressure in the chamber 35 to 11 hPa or less, preferably 4 hPa or less, using an Ar gas whose dew point is adjusted.


In a single roll method, it is conventionally considered that increasing a cooling rate and rapidly cooling the molten metal 32 are preferable, and that the cooling rate is preferably increased by widening a temperature difference between the molten metal 32 and the roll 33. It is thus considered that the roll 33 preferably normally has a temperature of about 5 to 30° C. The present inventors, however, have found that when the roll 33 has a temperature of 50 to 70° C., which is higher than that of a conventional roll method, and a vapor pressure in the chamber 35 is 11 hPa or less, the molten metal 32 is cooled uniformly, and a ribbon of a soft magnetic alloy to be obtained before a heat treatment easily becomes uniformly amorphous. Incidentally, a vapor pressure in the chamber has no lower limit. The vapor pressure may be adjusted to 1 hPa or less by filling the chamber with an Ar gas whose dew point is adjusted or by controlling the chamber to a state close to vacuum. When the vapor pressure is high, an amorphous ribbon before a heat treatment is hard to be obtained, and the above-mentioned favorable Fe composition network phase is hard to be obtained after a heat treatment mentioned below even if an amorphous ribbon before a heat treatment is obtained.


The obtained ribbon 34 undergoes a heat treatment, and the above-mentioned favorable Fe composition network phase can be thereby obtained. In this case, the above-mentioned favorable Fe composition network phase is easily obtained if the ribbon 34 is completely amorphous.


There is no limit to conditions of the heat treatment. Favorable conditions of the heat treatment differ depending on composition of a soft magnetic alloy. Normally, a heat treatment temperature is preferably about 500 to 600° C., and a heat treatment time is preferably about 0.5 to 10 hours, but favorable heat treatment temperature and heat treatment time may be in a range deviated from the above ranges depending on the composition.


In addition to the above-mentioned single roll method, a powder of the soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment is obtained by a water atomizing method or a gas atomizing method, for example. Hereinafter, a gas atomizing method will be described.


In a gas atomizing method, a molten alloy of 1200 to 1500° C. is obtained similarly to the above-mentioned single roll method. Thereafter, the molten alloy is sprayed in a chamber, and a powder is prepared.


At this time, the above-mentioned favorable Fe composition network phase is finally easily obtained with a gas spray temperature of 50 to 100° C. and a vapor pressure of 4 hPa or less in the chamber.


After the powder is prepared by the gas atomizing method, a heat treatment is conducted at 500 to 650° C. for 0.5 to 10 minutes. This makes it possible to promote diffusion of elements while the powder is prevented from being coarse due to sintering of each particle, reach a thermodynamic equilibrium state for a short time, remove distortion and stress, and easily obtain a Fe composition network phase. It is then possible to obtain a soft magnetic alloy powder having soft magnetic properties that are favorable particularly in high-frequency regions.


An embodiment of the present invention has been accordingly described, but the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned embodiment.


The soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment has any shape, such as a ribbon shape and a powder shape as described above. The soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment may also have a block shape.


The soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment is used for any purpose, such as for magnetic cores, and can be favorably used for magnetic cores for inductors, particularly for power inductors. In addition to magnetic cores, the soft magnetic alloy according to the present embodiment can be also favorably used for thin film inductors, magnetic heads, transformers, and the like.


Hereinafter, a method for obtaining a magnetic core and an inductor from the soft magnetic alloy according to the preset embodiment will be described, but is not limited to the following method.


For example, a magnetic core from a ribbon-shaped soft magnetic alloy is obtained by winding or laminating the ribbon-shaped soft magnetic alloy. When a ribbon-shaped soft magnetic alloy is laminated via an insulator, a magnetic core having further improved properties can be obtained.


For example, a magnetic core from a powder-shaped soft magnetic alloy is obtained by appropriately mixing the powder-shaped soft magnetic alloy with a binder and pressing this using a die. When an oxidation treatment, an insulation coating, or the like is carried out against the surface of the powder before the mixture with the binder, resistivity is improved, and a magnetic core further suitable for high-frequency regions is obtained.


The pressing method is not limited. Examples of the pressing method include a pressing using a die and a mold pressing. There is no limit to the kind of the binder. Examples of the binder include a silicone resin. There is no limit to a mixture ratio between the soft magnetic alloy powder and the binder either. For example, 1 to 10 mass % of the binder is mixed with 100 mass % of the soft magnetic alloy powder.


For example, 100 mass % of the soft magnetic alloy powder is mixed with 1 to 5 mass % of a binder and compressively pressed using a die, and it is thereby possible to obtain a magnetic core having a space factor (powder filling rate) of 70% or more, a magnetic flux density of 0.4 T or more at the time of applying a magnetic field of 1.6×104 A/m, and a resistivity of 1 Ω·cm or more. These properties are more excellent than those of normal ferrite magnetic cores.


For example, 100 mass % of the soft magnetic alloy powder is mixed with 1 to 3 mass % of a binder and compressively pressed using a die under a temperature condition that is equal to or higher than a softening point of the binder, and it is thereby possible to obtain a dust core having a space factor of 80% or more, a magnetic flux density of 0.9 T or more at the time of applying a magnetic field of 1.6×104 A/m, and a resistivity of 0.1 Ω·cm or more. These properties are more excellent than those of normal dust cores.


Moreover, a green compact constituting the above-mentioned magnetic core undergoes a heat treatment after pressing as a heat treatment for distortion removal. This further decreases core loss and improves usability.


An inductance product is obtained by winding a wire around the above-mentioned magnetic core. The wire is wound by any method, and the inductance product is manufactured by any method. For example, a wire is wound around a magnetic core manufactured by the above-mentioned method at least in one or more turns.


Moreover, when soft magnetic alloy particles are used, there is a method of manufacturing an inductance product by pressing and integrating a magnetic body incorporating a wire coil. In this case, an inductance product corresponding to high frequencies and large current is obtained easily.


Moreover, when soft magnetic alloy particles are used, an inductance product can be obtained by carrying out heating and firing after alternately printing and laminating a soft magnetic alloy paste obtained by pasting the soft magnetic alloy particles added with a binder and a solvent and a conductor paste obtained by pasting a conductor metal for coils added with a binder and a solvent. Instead, an inductance product where a coil is incorporated in a magnetic body can be obtained by preparing a soft magnetic alloy sheet using a soft magnetic alloy paste, printing a conductor paste on the surface of the soft magnetic alloy sheet, and laminating and firing them.


Here, when an inductance product is manufactured using soft magnetic alloy particles, in view of obtaining excellent Q properties, it is preferred to use a soft magnetic alloy powder whose maximum particle size is 45 μm or less by sieve diameter and center particle size (D50) is 30 μm or less. In order to have a maximum particle size of 45 μm or less by sieve diameter, only a soft magnetic alloy powder that passes through a sieve whose mesh size is 45 μm may be used.


The larger a maximum particle size of a soft magnetic alloy powder is, the further Q values in high-frequency regions tend to decrease. In particular, when using a soft magnetic alloy powder whose maximum particle diameter is more than 45 μm by sieve diameter, Q values in high-frequency regions may decrease greatly. When emphasis is not placed on Q values in high-frequency regions, however, a soft magnetic alloy powder having a large variation can be used. When a soft magnetic alloy powder having a large variation is used, cost can be reduced due to comparatively inexpensive manufacture thereof.


EXAMPLES

Hereinafter, the present invention will be described based on Examples.


(Experiment 1: Sample No. 1 to Sample No. 26)

Pure metal materials were respectively weighed so that a base alloy having a composition of Fe: 73.5 atom %, Si: 13.5 atom %, B: 9.0 atom %, Nb: 3.0 atom %, and Cu: 1.0 atom % was obtained. Then, the base alloy was manufactured by evacuating a chamber and thereafter melting the pure metal materials by high-frequency heating.


Then, the prepared base alloy was heated and molten to be turned into a metal in a molten state at 1300° C. This metal was thereafter sprayed against a roll by a single roll method at a predetermined temperature and a predetermined vapor pressure, and ribbons were prepared. These ribbons were configured to have a thickness of 20 μm by appropriately adjusting a rotation speed of the roll. Next, each of the prepared ribbons underwent a heat treatment, and single-plate samples were obtained.


In Experiment 1, each sample shown in Table 1 was manufactured by changing roll temperature, vapor pressure, and heat treatment conditions. The vapor pressure was adjusted using an Ar gas whose dew point had been adjusted.


Each of the ribbons before the heat treatment underwent an X-ray diffraction measurement for confirmation of existence of crystals. In addition, existence of microcrystals was confirmed by observing a restricted visual field diffraction image and a bright field image at 300,000 magnifications using a transmission electron microscope. As a result, it was confirmed that the ribbons of each example had no crystals or microcrystals and were amorphous.


Then, each sample after each ribbon underwent the heat treatment was measured with respect to coercivity, permeability at 1 kHz frequency, and permeability at 1 MHz frequency. Table 1 shows the results. A permeability of 9.0×104 or more at 1 kHz frequency was considered to be favorable. A permeability of 2.3×103 or more at 1 MHz frequency was considered to be favorable.


Moreover, each sample was measured using a three-dimensional atom probe (3DAP) with respect to the number of Fe content maximum points, a ratio of Fe content maximum points whose coordination number was 1 or more and 5 or less, a ratio of Fe content maximum points whose coordination number was 2 or more and 4 or less, and a content ratio of the Fe network phase to the entire sample. Table 1 shows the results.















TABLE 1













Network structures





Vapor

Heat treatment conditions
Number of















Example or
Roll
pressure in
Existence of
Heat treatment
Heat
maximum points


Sample
Comparative
temperature
chamber
crystals before
temperature
treatment
(ten thousand/


No.
Example
(° C.)
(hPa)
heat treatment
(° C.)
time (h)
μm3)





1
Comp. Ex.
70
25
micro crystalline
550
1
13


2
Comp. Ex.
70
18
amorphous
550
1
14


3
Ex.
70
11
amorphous
550
1
54


4
Ex.
70
4
amorphous
550
1
67


5
Ex.
70
Ar filling
amorphous
550
1
67


6
Ex.
70
vacuum
amorphous
550
1
67


7
Comp. Ex.
70
4
amorphous
550
0.1
67


8
Ex.
70
4
amorphous
550
0.5
72


9
Ex.
70
4
amorphous
550
10
58


10
Comp. Ex.
70
4
amorphous
550
100
32


11
Comp. Ex.
70
4
amorphous
450
1
5


12
Ex.
70
4
amorphous
500
1
72


13
Ex.
70
4
amorphous
550
1
66


14
Ex.
70
4
amorphous
600
1
58


15
Comp. Ex.
70
4
amorphous
650
1
54


16
Comp. Ex.
50
25
micro crystalline
550
1
13


17
Comp. Ex.
50
18
amorphous
550
1
30


18
Ex.
50
11
amorphous
550
1
48


19
Ex.
50
4
amorphous
550
1
66


20
Ex.
50
Ar filling
amorphous
550
1
67


21
Ex.
50
vacuum
amorphous
550
1
67


22
Comp. Ex.
30
25
amorphous
550
1
8


23
Comp. Ex.
30
11
amorphous
550
1
13


24
Comp. Ex.
30
4
amorphous
550
1
15


25
Comp. Ex.
30
Ar filling
amorphous
550
1
13


26
Comp. Ex.
30
vacuum
amorphous
550
1
14















Network structures



















Coordination
Coordination








number is 1
number is 2
Fe composition



Sample
or more and
or more and
network phase
Coercivity
μr
μr



No.
5 or less (%)
4 or less (%)
(vol %)
(A/m)
(1 kHz)
(1 MHz)







1



7.03
6200
730



2



1.86
63000
1900



3
95
76
35
0.96
103000
2700



4
95
84
36
0.85
118000
2800



5
95
84
36
0.79
110000
2670



6
96
82
35
0.73
108000
2560



7
66
54
18
1.23
52000
1800



8
84
69
31
0.82
108000
2730



9
96
83
41
0.92
103000
2570



10
73
48
54
1.25
68000
1800



11



1.40
40000
1500



12
84
69
31
0.82
108000
2730



13
96
83
37
0.86
107000
2580



14
96
83
41
0.94
101000
2570



15
70
43
52
48
2000
450



16



6.03
7200
800



17
76
45
20
1.53
55000
1840



18
93
73
36
0.95
113000
2650



19
95
84
37
0.89
110000
2680



20
95
84
36
0.86
114000
2590



21
96
82
35
0.80
115000
2810



22



1.73
64000
2210



23



1.83
54000
2100



24



1.65
70000
2200



25



1.67
55000
2100



26



1.59
63000
2000










Table 1 shows that amorphous ribbons are obtained in Examples where roll temperature was 50 to 70° C., vapor pressure was controlled to 11 hPa or less in a chamber of 30° C., and heat conditions were 500 to 600° C. and 0.5 to 10 hours. Then, it was confirmed that a favorable Fe network can be formed by carrying out a heat treatment against the ribbons. It was also confirmed that coercivity decreased and permeability improved.


On the other hand, the number of maximum points to be a condition of a favorable Fe network phase after a heat treatment tended to be small in comparative examples whose roll temperature is 30° C. (Sample No. 22 to Sample No. 26) or comparative examples whose roll temperature is 50° C. or 70° C. and vapor pressure is higher than 11 hPa (Sample No. 1, Sample No. 2, Sample No. 16, and Sample No. 17). That is, when the roll temperature was too low and the vapor pressure was too high at the time of manufacture of the ribbons, the number of maximum points after a heat treatment was small after the ribbons underwent a heat treatment, and a favorable Fe network could not be formed.


When the heat treatment temperature was too low (Sample No. 11) and the heat treatment time was too short (Sample No. 7), a favorable Fe network was not formed, and coercivity was higher and permeability was lower than those of Examples. When the heat treatment temperature was high (Sample No. 15) and the heat treatment time was too long (Sample No. 10), the number of maximum points of Fe tended to decrease. Sample No. 15 had a tendency that when the heat treatment temperature was high, coercivity deteriorated rapidly, and permeability decreased rapidly. It is conceived that this is because a part of the soft magnetic alloy forms boride (Fe2B). The formation of boride in Sample No. 15 was confirmed using an X-ray diffraction measurement.


(Experiment 2)

An experiment was carried out in the same manner as Experiment 1 by changing a composition of a base alloy at a roll temperature of 70° C. and a vapor pressure of 4 hPa in a chamber. Each sample underwent a heat treatment at 450° C., 500° C., 550° C., 600° C., and 650° C., and a temperature when coercivity was lowest was determined as a heat treatment temperature. Table 2 and Table 3 show characteristics at the temperature when coercivity was lowest. That is, the samples had different heat treatment temperatures. Table 2 shows the results of experiments carried out with Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based compositions. Table 3 and Table 4 show the results of experiments carried out with Fe-M′-B—C based compositions. Table 5 and Table 6 show the results of experiments carried out with Fe-M″-B—P—C based compositions. Table 7 shows the results of experiments carried out with Fe—Si—P—B—Cu—C based compositions.


In the Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based compositions, the above-mentioned favorable Fe network was formed, a coercivity of 2.0 A/m or less was considered to be favorable, a permeability of 5.0×104 or more at 1 kHz frequency was considered to be favorable, and a permeability of 2.0×103 or more at 1 MHz frequency was considered to be favorable. In the Fe-M′-B—C based compositions, a coercivity of 20 A/m or less was considered to be favorable, a permeability of 2.0×104 or more at 1 kHz frequency was considered to be favorable, and a permeability of 1.3×103 or more at 1 MHz frequency was considered to be favorable. In the Fe-M″-B—P—C based compositions, a coercivity of 4.0 A/m or less was considered to be favorable, a permeability of 5.0×104 or more at 1 kHz frequency was considered to be favorable, and a permeability of 2.0×103 or more at 1 MHz frequency was considered to be favorable. In the Fe—Si—P—B—Cu—C based compositions, a coercivity of 7.0 A/m or less was considered to be favorable, a permeability of 3.0×104 or more at 1 kHz frequency was considered to be favorable, and a permeability of 2.0×103 or more at 1 MHz frequency was considered to be favorable.


Sample No. 39 was observed using a 3DAP with 5 nm thickness. FIG. 1 shows the results. FIG. 1 shows that a part having a high Fe content is distributed in network in Example of Sample No. 39.











TABLE 2









Network structures

















Number of
Coordination
Coordination



Example or

Existence of
maximum points
number is 1
number is 2


Sample
Comparative

crystals before
(ten thousand/
or more and
or more and


No.
Example
Composition
heat treatment
μm3)
5 or less (%)
4 or less (%)





27
Comp. Ex.
Fe77.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B5
micro crystalline
11




28
Ex.
Fe75.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B7
amorphous
74
93
77


29
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9
amorphous
67
95
84


30
Ex.
Fe71.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B11
amorphous
58
90
76


31
Ex.
Fe69.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B13
amorphous
52
85
72


32
Comp. Ex.
Fe74.5Nb3Si13.5B9
micro crystalline
7




33
Ex.
Fe74.4Cu0.1Nb3Si13.5B9
amorphous
41
81
63


34
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9
amorphous
67
95
84


35
Ex.
Fe71.5Cu3Nb3Si13.5B9
amorphous
62
95
69











36
Comp. Ex.
Fe71Cu3.5Nb3Si13.5B9
crystalline
No ribbon was manufactured













37
Comp. Ex.
Fe79.5Cu1Nb3Si9.5B9
micro crystalline
7




38
Ex.
Fe75.5Cu1Nb3Si11.5B9
amorphous
71
87
69


39
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9
amorphous
67
95
84


40
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si15.5B7
amorphous
63
95
80


41
Ex.
Fe71.5Cu1Nb3Si15.5B9
amorphous
60
94
83


42
Ex.
Fe69.5Cu1Nb3Si17.5B9
amorphous
54
93
81


43
Comp. Ex.
Fe76.5Cu1Si13.5B9
crystalline





44
Ex.
Fe75.5Cu1Nb1Si13.5B9
amorphous
45
85
67


45
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9
amorphous
67
95
84


46
Ex.
Fe71.5Cu1Nb5Si13.5B9
amorphous
63
92
82


47
Ex.
Fe66.5Cu1Nb10Si13.5B9
amorphous
58
91
72


48
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Ti3Si13.5B9
amorphous
64
85
61


49
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Zr3Si13.5B9
amorphous
65
83
63


50
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Hf3Si13.5B9
amorphous
68
82
64


51
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1V3Si13.5B9
amorphous
67
84
68


52
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Ta3Si13.5B9
amorphous
67
81
62


53
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Mo3Si13.5B9
amorphous
58
85
68


54
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Hf1.5Nb1.5Si13.5B9
amorphous
71
93
77


55
Ex.
Fe79.5Cu1Nb2Si9.5B9C1
amorphous
43
82
55


56
Ex.
Fe79Cu1Nb2Si9B5C4
amorphous
48
81
62


57
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B8C1
amorphous
66
95
84


58
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B5C4
amorphous
54
90
77


59
Ex.
Fe69.5Cu1Nb3Si17.5B8C1
amorphous
42
81
63


60
Ex.
Fe69.5Cu1Nb3Si17.5B5C4
amorphous
44
82
58

















Network structures







Fe composition



Sample
network phase
Coercivity
μr
μr



No.
(vol %)
(A/m)
(1 kHz)
(1 MHz)







27

9
5400
640



28
45
1.17
93000
2560



29
36
0.85
118000
2800



30
32
0.84
103000
2620



31
33
0.94
97000
2540



32

14
3500
400



33
25
1.33
55000
2550



34
36
0.85
118000
2800



35
33
1.17
75000
2320










36
No ribbon was manufactured













37

24
2000
440



38
34
1.04
92000
2450



39
36
0.85
118000
2800



40
36
0.78
118000
2840



41
40
0.79
120000
2730



42
49
0.89
100200
2360



43

2800
1500
250



44
24
1.32
73000
2540



45
36
0.85
118000
2800



46
34
0.95
110000
2740



47
38
1.03
98000
2600



48
31
1.39
51000
2320



49
27
1.45
53000
2310



50
29
1.4
54000
2350



51
29
1.32
55000
2250



52
25
1.52
50000
2320



53
23
1.32
68000
2480



54
34
1.34
78000
2640



55
22
1.47
52000
2350



56
25
1.43
56000
2270



57
37
0.77
121000
2830



58
33
1.01
98000
2550



59
33
1.21
89000
2460



60
35
1.31
71000
2300



















TABLE 3









Network structures
















State before
Number of
Coordination
Coordination



Example or

heat treatment
maximum points
number is 1
number is 2


Sample
Comparative

(amorphous or
(ten thousand/
or more and
or more and


No.
Example
Composition
crystalline)
μm3)
5 or less (%)
4 or less (%)





61
Comp. Ex.
Fe88Nb3B9
crystalline





62
Ex.
Fe86Nb5B9
amorphous
82
89
70


63
Ex.
Fe84Nb7B9
amorphous
107
93
83


64
Ex.
Fe81Nb10B9
amorphous
120
94
84


65
Ex.
Fe77Nb14B9
amorphous
115
91
82


66
Comp. Ex.
Fe90Nb7B3
crystalline





67
Ex.
Fe87Nb7B6
amorphous
89
81
67


68
Ex.
Fe84Nb7B9
amorphous
107
93
83


69
Ex.
Fe81Nb7B12
amorphous
93
91
75


70
Ex.
Fe75Nb7B18
amorphous
86
93
76


71
Ex.
Fe84Nb7B9
amorphous
107
93
83


72
Ex.
Fe83.9Cu0.1Nb7B9
amorphous
121
90
84


73
Ex.
Fe83Cu2Nb7B9
amorphous
141
91
87


74
Comp. Ex.
Fe81Cu3Nb7B9
crystalline





75
Comp. Ex.
Fe85.9Cu0.1Nb5B9
micro crystalline
30




76
Ex.
Fe83.9Cu0.1Nb7B9
amorphous
121
90
84


77
Ex.
Fe80.9Cu0.1Nb10B9
amorphous
130
88
83


78
Ex.
Fe76.9Cu0.1Nb14B9
amorphous
106
86
65


79
Comp. Ex.
Fe89.9Cu0.1Nb7B3
micro crystalline
35




80
Ex.
Fe88.4Cu0.1Nb7B4.5
amorphous
138
95
86


81
Ex.
Fe83.9Cu0.1Nb7B9
amorphous
121
90
84


82
Ex.
Fe80.9Cu0.1Nb7B12
amorphous
110
85
76


83
Ex.
Fe74.9Cu0.1Nb7B18
amorphous
98
81
69


84
Ex.
Fe91Zr7B2
amorphous
83
94
82


85
Ex.
Fe90Zr7B3
amorphous
92
97
89


86
Ex.
Fe89Zr7B3Cu1
amorphous
110
93
83


87
Ex.
Fe90Hf7B3
amorphous
109
93
83


88
Ex.
Fe89Hf7B4
amorphous
111
91
88


89
Ex.
Fe88Hf7B3Cu1
amorphous
133
90
73


90
Ex.
Fe84Nb3.5Zr3.5B8Cu1
amorphous
125
93
87


91
Ex.
Fe84Nb3.5Hf3.5B8Cu1
amorphous
125
94
88


92
Ex.
Fe90.9Nb6B3C0.1
amorphous
89
81
67


93
Ex.
Fe93.06Nb2.97B2.97C1
amorphous
67
89
78


94
Ex.
Fe94.05Nb1.98B2.97C1
amorphous
54
85
74


95
Ex.
Fe90.9Nb1.98B2.97C4
amorphous
46
93
85


96
Ex.
Fe90.9Nb3B6C0.1
amorphous
77
93
77


97
Ex.
Fe94.5Nb3B2C0.5
amorphous
65
93
82


98
Ex.
Fe83.9Nb7B9C0.1
amorphous
121
92
79


99
Ex.
Fe80.8Nb6.7B8.65C3.85
amorphous
132
97
89


100
Ex.
Fe77.9Nb14B8C0.1
amorphous
98
83
64


101
Ex.
Fe75Nb13.5B7.5C4
amorphous
76
94
84


102
Ex.
Fe78Nb1B17C4
amorphous
56
93
72


103
Ex.
Fe78Nb1B20C1
amorphous
64
90
77

















Network structures







Fe composition



Sample
network phase
Coercivity
μr
μr



No.
(vol %)
(A/m)
(1 kHz)
(1 MHz)







61

15000
900
300



62
38
12.3
25000
1800



63
37
5.5
43000
2200



64
39
5.4
52000
2150



65
36
4.8
55000
2180



66

20000
2100
600



67
29
9.5
35000
1600



68
37
5.5
43000
2200



69
34
4.9
45000
2100



70
31
3.9
58000
1930



71
37
5.5
43000
2100



72
36
3.9
59000
2200



73
39
3.7
60000
2350



74

18000
2100
650



75

25
10000
1300



76
36
3.9
59000
2200



77
39
3.7
65000
1800



78
47
4.8
37000
1840



79

16000
1800
560



80
36
9.9
48000
1950



81
36
3.9
59000
2200



82
32
6.3
38000
1930



83
45
7.8
25000
1880



84
37
6.8
23000
1500



85
35
3.7
42000
1890



86
36
4.1
49000
2010



87
36
5.1
38000
1840



88
35
3.9
45000
1930



89
38
2.7
60000
2160



90
35
1.4
110000
2790



91
35
1.1
100000
2570



92
36
5.9
24000
1300



93
37
4.8
30000
1600



94
37
4.9
56000
2100



95
35
3.1
64000
2300



96
34
5.8
28000
1400



97
38
4.8
23000
1380



98
39
3.6
42000
1860



99
40
2.8
79000
2300



100
32
7.6
23000
1700



101
39
3.2
64000
2130



102
41
11.2
34000
1400



103
44
10.3
23000
1390



















TABLE 4









Network structures
















State before
Number of
Coordination
Coordination



Example or

heat treatment
maximum points
number is 1
number is 2


Sample
Comparative

(amorphous or
(ten thousand/
or more and
or more and


No.
Example
Composition
crystalline)
μm3)
5 or less (%)
4 or less (%)





104
Ex.
Fe86.6Nb3.2B10Cu0.1C0.1
amorphous
102
98
82


105
Ex.
Fe75.8Nb14B10Cu0.1C0.1
amorphous
98
93
89


106
Ex.
Fe89.8Nb7B3Cu0.1C0.1
amorphous
131
99
83


107
Ex.
Fe72.8Nb7B20Cu0.1C0.1
amorphous
88
92
83


108
Ex.
Fe80.8Nb3.2B10Cu3C3
amorphous
98
91
88


109
Ex.
Fe70Nb14B10Cu3C3
amorphous
76
85
89


110
Ex.
Fe84Nb7B3Cu3C3
amorphous
107
93
83


111
Ex.
Fe67Nb7B20Cu3C3
amorphous
68
95
72


112
Ex.
Fe85Nb3B10Cu1C1
amorphous
92
87
53


113
Ex.
Fe84.8Nb3.2B10Cu1C1
amorphous
121
95
88


114
Ex.
Fe83Nb5B10Cu1C1
amorphous
111
96
86


115
Ex.
Fe81Nb7B10Cu1C1
amorphous
109
93
83


116
Ex.
Fe78Nb10B10Cu1C1
amorphous
105
95
78


117
Ex.
Fe76Nb12B10Cu1C1
amorphous
82
83
76


118
Ex.
Fe74Nb14B10Cu1C1
amorphous
73
85
69


160
Ex.
Fe75.8Nb14B10Cr0.1Cu0.1
amorphous
103
94
83


161
Ex.
Fe82.8Nb7B10Cr0.1Cu0.1
amorphous
112
93
84


162
Ex.
Fe86.8Nb3B10Cr0.1Cu0.1
amorphous
126
94
82


163
Ex.
Fe72.8Nb7B20Cr0.1Cu0.1
amorphous
45
84
69


164
Ex.
Fe89.8Nb7B3Cr0.1Cu0.1
amorphous
122
92
81


165
Ex.
Fe73Nb14B10Cr1.5Cu1.5
amorphous
63
83
68


166
Ex.
Fe80Nb7B10Cr1.5Cu1.5
amorphous
73
93
75


167
Ex.
Fe84Nb3B10Cr1.5Cu1.5
amorphous
62
95
63


168
Ex.
Fe70Nb7B20Cr1.5Cu1.5
amorphous
43
94
77


169
Ex.
Fe87Nb7B3Cr1.5Cu1.5
amorphous
92
81
54


170
Ex.
Fe72Nb11B14Cr1Cu2
amorphous
72
83
68


171
Ex.
Fe73Nb10B14Cr1Cu2
amorphous
72
86
71


172
Ex.
Fe90Nb5B3.5Cr0.5Cu1
amorphous
83
87
75


173
Ex.
Fe91Nb4.5B3Cr0.5Cu1
amorphous
83
88
77


174
Ex.
Fe74.5Nb14B10Cr0.5Cu1
amorphous
84
82
73


175
Ex.
Fe76.5Nb12B10Cr0.5Cu1
amorphous
85
84
77


176
Ex.
Fe78.5Nb10 B10Cr0.5Cu1
amorphous
91
85
76


177
Ex.
Fe81.5Nb7B10Cr0.5Cu1
amorphous
93
85
75


178
Ex.
Fe83.5Nb5B10Cr0.5Cu1
amorphous
95
88
79


179
Ex.
Fe85.5Nb3B10Cr0.5Cu1
amorphous
98
89
73

















Network structures







Fe composition



Sample
network phase
Coercivity
μr
μr



No.
(vol %)
(A/m)
(1 kHz)
(1 MHz)







104
35
1.1
98000
2540



105
36
1.3
92000
2560



106
43
1.0
102000
2870



107
35
1.4
90200
2490



108
32
1.5
85700
2540



109
31
1.6
86300
2460



110
37
1.5
85700
2440



111
26
1.7
81700
2310



112
44
2.1
74400
2050



113
39
1.0
101200
2870



114
38
1.1
98100
2910



115
39
1.1
98180
2830



116
37
1.2
95300
2730



117
35
1.4
90200
2450



118
36
1.4
90000
2200



160
27
2.3
64500
2310



161
36
2.0
53000
2350



162
36
2.0
52300
2360



163
28
2.4
69200
2100



164
38
1.9
64590
2370



165
32
2.3
43500
2250



166
34
2.1
56300
2300



167
34
2.1
54300
2100



168
32
2.5
53200
2320



169
44
2.0
54200
2100



170
44
2.6
32400
2030



171
41
2.1
52300
2250



172
38
2.1
56300
2390



173
41
2.5
48300
2110



174
38
2.2
55000
2320



175
34
1.9
58300
2370



176
32
1.9
58200
2380



177
33
1.8
59800
2390



178
31
1.8
61000
2320



179
34
1.8
59300
2310



















TABLE 5









Network structures
















State before
Number of
Coordination
Coordination



Example or

heat treatment
maximum points
number is 1
number is 2


Sample
Comparative

(amorphous or
(ten thousand/
or more and
or more and


No.
Example
Composition
crystalline)
μm3)
5 or less (%)
4 or less (%)





120
Ex.
Fe82.9Nb7B10P0.1
amorphous
83
97
84


121
Ex.
Fe82.5Nb7B10P0.5
amorphous
72
96
83


122
Ex.
Fe82Nb7B10P1
amorphous
73
94
84


123
Ex.
Fe79Nb7B10P2
amorphous
64
85
79


124
Ex.
Fe81Nb7B10P3Cu1C1
amorphous
72
82
77


125
Comp. Ex.
Fe79.5Nb7B10P3.5
amorphous
63
65
56


126
Ex.
Fe93.7Nb3.2B3P0.1
amorphous
116
94
77


127
Ex.
Fe74.9Nb12B13P0.1
amorphous
75
92
75


128
Ex.
Fe91Nb3.2B13P3
amorphous
98
91
73


129
Ex.
Fe73Nb14B10P3
amorphous
63
89
68


130
Ex.
Fe81.9Nb7B10P0.1C1
amorphous
112
94
72


131
Ex.
Fe81.5Nb7B10P0.5C1
amorphous
114
98
84


 131′
Ex.
Fe81.5Zr7B10P0.5C1
amorphous
113
95
85


 131″
Ex.
Fe81.5Hf7B10P0.5C1
amorphous
112
95
84


132
Ex.
Fe81Nb7B10P1C1
amorphous
95
93
82


133
Ex.
Fe80Nb7B10P2C1
amorphous
90
88
73


134
Ex.
Fe79Nb7B10P3C1
amorphous
82
80
65


135
Comp. Ex.
Fe78.5Nb7B10P3.5C1
amorphous
73
56
34


136
Ex.
Fe93.8Nb3.2B2.8P0.1C0.1
amorphous
132
97
84


137
Ex.
Fe72.9Nb12B13P0.1C2
amorphous
66
92
75


138
Ex.
Fe90.9Nb3.2B13P3C0.1
amorphous
73
91
73


139
Ex.
Fe70Nb14B10P3C2
amorphous
68
89
68


140
Ex.
Fe80.9Nb7B10P0.1Cu1
amorphous
129
95
82


141
Ex.
Fe81.5Nb7B10P0.5Cu1
amorphous
131
96
84


142
Ex.
Fe81Nb7B10P1Cu1
amorphous
109
93
83


143
Ex.
Fe80Nb7B10P2Cu1
amorphous
104
92
75


144
Ex.
Fe79Nb7B10P3Cu1
amorphous
94
84
73


145
Ex.
Fe78.5Nb7B10P3.5Cu1
amorphous
84
80
68


146
Ex.
Fe93.8Nb3.2B2.8P0.1Cu0.1
amorphous
152
94
65


147
Ex.
Fe73.4Nb12B13P0.1Cu1.5
amorphous
76
94
71


148
Ex.
Fe90.9Nb3.2B13P3Cu0.1
amorphous
84
85
72


149
Ex.
Fe70.5Nb14B10P3Cu1.5
amorphous
78
94
74


150
Ex.
Fe80.9Nb7B10P0.1Cu1C1
amorphous
142
95
82


151
Ex.
Fe80.5Nb7B10P0.5Cu1C1
amorphous
143
96
84


152
Ex.
Fe80Nb7B10P1Cu1C1
amorphous
121
94
83


153
Ex.
Fe79Nb7B10P2Cu1C1
amorphous
110
93
75


154
Ex.
Fe78Nb7B10P3Cu1C1
amorphous
100
85
73


155
Ex.
Fe77.5Nb7B10P3.5Cu1C1
amorphous
93
84
68


156
Ex.
Fe93.7Nb3.2B2.8P0.1Cu0.1C0.1
amorphous
157
95
83


157
Ex.
Fe71.4Nb12B13P0.1Cu1.5C2
amorphous
84
92
71


158
Ex.
Fe90.8Nb3.2B2.8P3Cu0.1C0.1
amorphous
91
93
72


159
Ex.
Fe68.5Nb12B13P3Cu1.5C2
amorphous
83
94
74

















Network structures







Fe composition



Sample
network phase
Coercivity
μr
μr



No.
(vol %)
(A/m)
(1 kHz)
(1 MHz)







120
38
1.2
94300
2600



121
33
1.2
94300
2530



122
34
1.3
91600
2500



123
36
1.4
89100
2420



124
37
1.6
84600
2390



125
38
2.1
74400
1890



126
47
1.0
79300
2340



127
33
1.3
91600
2510



128
45
1.5
74300
2340



129
33
1.6
84600
2200



130
37
1.1
98000
2540



131
38
1.1
98000
2840



 131′
37
1.2
97000
2750



 131″
36
1.2
96000
2700



132
36
1.2
95400
2520



133
38
1.3
92900
2500



134
42
1.4
88400
2250



135
43
1.9
78100
1840



136
47
0.9
82000
2600



137
33
1.2
95380
2520



138
45
1.3
81300
2480



139
33
1.4
88400
2200



140
43
1.3
90800
2400



141
38
1.3
90000
2830



142
37
1.4
88200
2660



143
36
1.5
85700
2550



144
35
1.7
81200
2530



145
38
2.3
71000
2300



146
48
1.1
74400
2240



147
38
1.4
88200
2450



148
44
1.6
83500
2320



149
38
1.7
81200
2430



150
43
1.2
95300
2300



151
38
1.2
95400
2630



152
37
1.3
92600
2500



153
36
1.4
90200
2480



154
35
1.5
85700
2460



155
26
1.6
84200
2210



156
35
1.0
83200
2850



157
36
1.3
92600
2500



158
39
1.4
87900
2460



159
27
1.5
85700
2200



















TABLE 6









Network structures
















State before
Number of
Coordination
Coordination



Example or

heat treatment
maximum points
number is 1
number is 2


Sample
Comparative

(amorphous or
(ten thousand/
or more and
or more and


No.
Example
Composition
crystalline)
μm3)
5 or less (%)
4 or less (%)





194
Ex.
Fe81.4Nb7B10Cr0.5P0.1Cu1
amorphous
74
94
81


195
Ex.
Fe81Nb7B10Cr0.5P0.5Cu1
amorphous
94
96
84


196
Ex.
Fe80.5Nb7B10Cr0.5P1Cu1
amorphous
109
94
83


197
Ex.
Fe79.5Nb7B10Cr0.5P2Cu1
amorphous
101
93
75


198
Ex.
Fe78.5Nb7B10Cr0.5P3Cu1
amorphous
95
83
70


199
Ex.
Fe78Nb7B10P3.5Cr0.5Cu1
amorphous
90
84
68


200
Ex.
Fe93.7Nb3.2B2.8Cr0.1P0.1Cu0.1
amorphous
157
102
83


201
Ex.
Fe71.9Nb12B13Cr1.5P0.1Cu1.5
amorphous
84
92
71


202
Ex.
Fe90.8Nb3.2B2.8Cr0.1P3Cu0.1
amorphous
91
93
72


203
Ex.
Fe69Nb12B13Cr1.5P3Cu1.5
amorphous
83
94
74


204
Ex.
Fe80.4Nb7B10Cr0.5P0.1Cu1C1
amorphous
95
93
81


205
Ex.
Fe80Nb7B10Cr0.5P0.5Cu1C1
amorphous
93
91
75


206
Ex.
Fe79.5Nb7B10Cr0.5P1Cu1C1
amorphous
89
89
73


207
Ex.
Fe78.5Nb7B10Cr0.5P2Cu1C1
amorphous
83
85
72


208
Ex.
Fe77.5Nb7B10Cr0.5P3Cu1C1
amorphous
48
83
63


209
Comp. Ex.
Fe77Nb7B10P3.5Cr0.5Cu1C1
amorphous
38
53
21


210
Ex.
Fe93.6Nb3.2B2.8Cr0.1P0.1Cu0.1C0.1
amorphous
143
94
84


211
Ex.
Fe69.9Nb12B13Cr1.5P0.1Cu1.5C2
amorphous
84
91
73


212
Ex.
Fe90.7Nb3.2B2.8Cr0.1P3Cu0.1C0.1
amorphous
91
92
71


213
Ex.
Fe67Nb12B13Cr1.5P3Cu1.5C2
amorphous
83
93
74

















Network structures







Fe composition



Sample
network phase
Coercivity
μr
μr



No.
(vol %)
(A/m)
(1 kHz)
(1 MHz)







194
37
1.4
73200
2340



195
38
1.4
73200
2450



196
37
1.5
78300
2470



197
36
1.6
74200
2340



198
33
1.8
73200
2350



199
33
3.8
51000
2100



200
35
1.2
83200
2640



201
36
1.5
76100
2450



202
39
1.7
71300
2460



203
25
1.8
79200
2120



204
38
1.3
82400
2500



205
37
1.3
85400
2500



206
36
1.4
89900
2480



207
35
1.5
87400
2460



208
32
1.7
82900
2420



209
25
3.5
48200
1350



210
35
1.1
89000
2840



211
36
1.4
89300
2430



212
39
1.6
85200
2340



213
27
1.7
83000
2230



















TABLE 7









Network structures
















State before
Number of
Coordination
Coordination



Example or

heat treatment
maximum points
number is 1
number is 2


Sample
Comparative

(amorphous or
(ten thousand/
or more and
or more and


No.
Example
Composition
crystalline)
μm3)
5 or less (%)
4 or less (%)





214
Ex.
Fe86.9Cu0.1P1Si2B9C1
amorphous
84
93
73


215
Ex.
Fe80.9Cu0.1P1Si8B9C1
amorphous
75
94
74


216
Ex.
Fe82.9Cu0.1P2Si2B9C4
amorphous
74
95
75


217
Ex.
Fe76.9Cu0.1P2Si8B9C4
amorphous
60
93
74


218
Ex.
Fe83.3Si6B10Cu0.7
amorphous
73
94
73


219
Ex.
Fe83.3Si4B10P2Cu0.7
amorphous
75
92
74


220
Ex.
Fe83.3Si2B10P4Cu0.7
amorphous
74
94
73


221
Ex.
Fe83.3B10P6Cu0.7
amorphous
75
93
73


222
Ex.
Fe83.3Si3B5P8Cu0.7
amorphous
73
93
75


223
Ex.
Fe83.3Si1B13P2Cu0.7
amorphous
72
92
74

















Network structures







Fe composition



Sample
network phase
Coercivity
μr
μr



No.
(vol %)
(A/m)
(1 kHz)
(1 MHz)







214
38
4.8
43000
2130



215
38
3.2
51200
2240



216
32
4.3
48300
2310



217
33
3.1
51200
2430



218
42
5.4
32400
2200



219
41
4.3
48300
2230



220
32
4.3
49300
2300



221
33
3.3
51000
2300



222
34
3.8
52000
2330



223
45
6.3
43200
2100










As shown in Table 2 to Table 7, a ribbon obtained by a single roll method at a roll temperature of 70° C. and a vapor pressure of 4 hPa can form an amorphous phase even if a base alloy has different compositions, and a heat treatment at an appropriate temperature forms a favorable Fe composition network phase, decreases coercivity, and improves permeability.


Examples having a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based composition shown in Table 2 tended to have a comparatively small number of maximum points, and examples having a Fe-M′-B—C based composition shown in Table 3 and Table 4 tended to have a comparatively large number of maximum points.


In samples having a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based composition shown in Table 2, particularly Sample No. 32 to Sample No. 36, the number of maximum points of Fe tended to increase by a small amount of addition of Cu. When a Cu content is too large, there is a tendency that a ribbon before a heat treatment obtained by a single roll method contains crystals, and a favorable Fe network is not formed.


In samples having a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based composition shown in Table 2, particularly Sample No. 43 to Sample No. 47, a sample having a smaller Nb content shows that a ribbon obtained by a single roll method tended to easily contain crystals. A sample having a larger Nb content tended to easily have a decreased number of maximum points of Fe and a decreased permeability.


In samples having a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based composition shown in Table 2, particularly Sample No. 27 to Sample No. 31, a sample having a smaller B content shows that a ribbon before a heat treatment obtained by a single roll method tended to easily contain microcrystals. A sample having a larger B content tended to easily have a decreased number of maximum points of Fe and a decreased permeability.


In samples having a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based composition shown in Table 2, particularly Sample No. 37 to Sample No. 42, a sample having a smaller Si content tended to have a decreased permeability.


In samples having a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based composition shown in Table 2, particularly Sample No. 55 and Sample No. 56, amorphousness tended to be maintained by containing C even in a range where a Fe content is increased, and a favorable Fe network tended to be formed.


In samples having a Fe-M′-B—C based composition shown in Table 3, particularly Sample No. 61 to Sample No. 65, a sample having a smaller M content shows that a ribbon before a heat treatment obtained by a single roll method tended to contain crystals.


In samples having a Fe-M′-B—C based composition shown in Table 3, particularly Sample No. 66 to Sample No. 70, a sample having a smaller B content shows that a ribbon before a heat treatment obtained by a single roll method tended to contain crystals, and a sample having a larger B content shows that the number of maximum points of Fe tended to decrease.


As a result of similar examination with respect to Sample No. 71 to Sample No. 103 in Table 3 and Sample No. 104 to Sample No. 118 and Sample No. 160 to Sample No. 179 in Table 4, it was confirmed that an amorphous phase was formed in a soft magnetic alloy ribbon having an appropriate composition and manufactured at a roll temperature of 70° C. and a vapor pressure of 4 hPa in a chamber. Then, the samples tended to have a network structure of Fe, a low coercivity, and a high permeability by carrying out an appropriate heat treatment. Sample No. 104 to Sample No. 118, which contained 0.1 to 3.0 atom % of Cu and 0.1 to 3.0 atom % of C, tended to have a lower coercivity and a higher permeability, compared to the other samples.


A coordination number distribution of all maximum points was graphed with respect to Sample No. 39 of Table 2 and Sample No. 63 of Table 3. FIG. 9 shows the graphed results. In FIG. 9, a horizontal axis represents a coordination number, and a vertical axis represents a maximum-point number ratio taking the coordination number. The total number of maximum points is 100%, and the vertical axis represents a ratio of maximum points taking respective coordination number.



FIG. 9 shows that the Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based composition shown in Table 2 has a smaller variation of coordination number than that of the Fe-M′-B—C based composition shown in Table 3.


As a result of similar examination with respect to Sample No. 120 to Sample No. 159 in Table 5 and Sample No. 194 to Sample No. 213 in Table 6, which had a Fe-M″-B—P—C based composition, it was confirmed that an amorphous phase was formed in a soft magnetic alloy ribbon having an appropriate composition and manufactured at a roll temperature of 70° C. and a vapor pressure of 4 hPa in a chamber. Then, the samples tended to have a network structure of Fe, a low coercivity, and a high permeability by carrying out an appropriate heat treatment. In a sample having less B, P and/or C content, the number of maximum points and a ratio of maximum points whose coordination number was 1 or more and 5 or less were larger easily, and favorable characteristics were obtained easily.


As a result of similar examination with respect to Sample No. 214 to Sample No. 223 in Table 7, which had a Fe—Si—P—B—Cu—C based composition, it was confirmed that an amorphous phase was formed in a soft magnetic alloy ribbon having an appropriate composition and manufactured at a roll temperature of 70° C. and a vapor pressure of 4 hPa in a chamber. Then, the samples tended to have a network structure of Fe, a low coercivity, and a high permeability by carrying out an appropriate heat treatment. In a sample having more Si content, the number of maximum points and a ratio of maximum points whose coordination number was 1 or more and 5 or less were larger easily, and favorable characteristics were obtained easily. According to Sample No. 214 to Sample No. 217, it was found that favorable characteristics were obtained easily in a sample having a larger Si content and a smaller Fe content. According to Sample No. 218 to Sample No. 221, it was found that when a total of a Si content and a P content was constant, favorable characteristics were obtained easily in a sample having a larger P content.


(Experiment 3)

Pure metal materials were respectively weighed so that a base alloy having a composition of Fe: 73.5 atom %, Si: 13.5 atom %, B: 9.0 atom %, Nb: 3.0 atom %, and Cu: 1.0 atom % was obtained. Then, the base alloy was manufactured by evacuating a chamber and thereafter melting the pure metal materials by high-frequency heating.


Then, the manufactured base alloy was heated and molten to be turned into a metal in a molten state at 1300° C. This metal was thereafter sprayed by a gas atomizing method in predetermined conditions shown in Table 8 below, and powders were prepared. In Experiment 3, Sample No. 304 to Sample No. 307 were manufactured by changing a gas spray temperature and a vapor pressure in a chamber. The vapor pressure was adjusted using an Ar gas whose dew point had been adjusted.


Each of the powders before the heat treatment underwent an X-ray diffraction measurement for confirmation of existence of crystals. In addition, a restricted visual field diffraction image and a bright field image were observed by a transmission electron microscope. As a result, it was confirmed that each powder had no crystals and was completely amorphous.


Then, each of the obtained powders underwent a heat treatment and thereafter measured with respect to coercivity. Then, a Fe composition network was analyzed variously. A heat treatment temperature of a sample having a Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based composition was 550° C., a heat treatment temperature of a sample having a Fe-M′-B—C based composition was 600° C., and a heat treatment temperature of a sample having a Fe—Si—P—B—Cu—C based composition was 450° C. The heat treatment was carried out for 1 hour. In Experiment 3, a coercivity of 30 A/m or less was considered to be favorable in the Fe—Si-M-B—Cu—C based compositions (Sample No. 304 and Sample No. 305), and a coercivity of 100 A/m or less was considered to be favorable in the Fe-M′-B—C based compositions (Sample No. 306 and Sample No. 307).












TABLE 8









Network structures




















Gas

Number of
Coordination
Coordination
Fe




Example or

temper-
Vapor
maximum points
number is 1
number is 2
composition
Coer-


Sample
Comparative

ature
pressure
(ten thousand/
or more and
or more and
network phase
civity


No.
Example
Composition
(° C.)
(hPa)
μm3)
5 or less (%)
4 or less (%)
(vol %)
(A/m)



















304
Comp. Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9
30
25
13



38


305
Ex.
Fe73.5Cu1Nb3Si13.5B9
100
4
67
93
84
35
24


306
Comp. Ex.
Fe84Nb7B9
30
25
32



280


307
Ex.
Fe84Nb7B9
100
4
109
94
84
36
98









In Sample No. 305 and Sample No. 307, a favorable Fe network was formed by appropriately carrying out a heat treatment against the completely amorphous powders. In comparative examples of Sample No. 304 and Sample No. 306, whose gas temperature of 30° C. was too low and vapor pressure of 25 hPa was too high, however, the number of maximum points after the heat treatment was small, no favorable Fe composition network was formed, and coercivity was high.


When comparing comparative examples and examples shown in Table 8, it was found that an amorphous soft magnetic alloy powder was obtained by changing a gas spray temperature, and that the number of maximum points of Fe increased and a Fe composition network structure was obtained in the same manner as a ribbon by carrying out a heat treatment against the amorphous soft magnetic alloy powder. In addition, coercivity tended to be small by having a Fe network structure in the same manner as the ribbons of Experiments 1 and 2.


NUMERICAL REFERENCES




  • 10 . . . grid


  • 10
    a . . . maximum point


  • 10
    b . . . adjacent grid


  • 20
    a . . . region whose Fe content is higher than a threshold value


  • 20
    b . . . region whose Fe content is a threshold value or less


  • 31 . . . nozzle


  • 32 . . . molten metal


  • 33 . . . roll


  • 34 . . . ribbon


  • 35 . . . chamber


Claims
  • 1. A soft magnetic alloy comprising a main component of Fe, wherein the soft magnetic alloy comprises a Fe composition network phase where regions whose Fe content is larger than an average composition of the soft magnetic alloy are linked;the Fe composition network phase contains Fe content maximum points that are locally higher than their surroundings in 400,000/μm3 or more; anda ratio of Fe content maximum points whose coordination number is 1 or more and 5 or less is 80% or more and 100% or less with respect to all of the Fe content maximum points.
  • 2. The soft magnetic alloy according to claim 1, wherein a ratio of Fe content maximum points whose coordination number is 2 or more and 4 or less is 70% or more and 90% or less with respect to all of the Fe content maximum points.
  • 3. The soft magnetic alloy according to claim 1, wherein a volume ratio of the Fe composition network phase is 25 vol % or more and 50 vol % or less with respect to the entire soft magnetic alloy.
  • 4. The soft magnetic alloy according to claim 2, wherein a volume ratio of the Fe composition network phase is 25 vol % or more and 50 vol % or less with respect to the entire soft magnetic alloy.
  • 5. The soft magnetic alloy according to claim 1, wherein a volume ratio of the Fe composition network phase is 30 vol % or more and 40 vol % or less with respect to the entire soft magnetic alloy.
  • 6. The soft magnetic alloy according to claim 2, wherein a volume ratio of the Fe composition network phase is 30 vol % or more and 40 vol % or less with respect to the entire soft magnetic alloy.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2016-194634 Sep 2016 JP national