1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to improved soft magnetic iron-cobalt-based alloys, more particularly to improvements to such alloys with a cobalt content of 10 percent by weight (% by weight) to 22% by weight, to methods for the production of such improved alloys, to methods for the production of finished and semi-finished products from these alloys, and to products containing such alloys, in particular magnetic components for actuator systems.
2. Description of Related Art
Soft magnetic iron-cobalt-based alloys have a high saturation magnetisation and can therefore be used in the design of actuator systems with high power and/or a small overall volume. Solenoid valves, for example solenoid valves for fuel injection in internal combustion engines, are a typical application of such alloys.
Certain soft magnetic iron-cobalt-based alloys with a cobalt content of 10% by weight to 22% by weight are, for example, known from U.S. Pat. No. 7,128,790. However, when using these alloys in high-speed actuators, switching frequency can be limited by the eddy currents which are generated. Improvements in the strength of the magnet cores are also desirable in high-frequency actuator systems designed for continuous duty.
The invention is therefore based on the problem of providing an improved alloy which, by virtue of its novel composition, is better suited for use as a magnet core in high-speed actuators than prior alloys described above.
The invention will be more clearly understood by reference to the specific embodiments, which are not intended to limit the scope of the invention, or of the appended claims.
According to the invention, this problem is solved by the subject matter of the independent claims. Advantageous further developments can be derived from the dependent claims.
According to the invention, a soft magnetic alloy consists essentially of 10% by weight≦Co≦22% by weight, 0% by weight≦V≦4% by weight, 1.5% by weight≦Cr≦5% by weight, 1% by weight≦Mn≦2% by weight, 0% by weight≦Mo≦1% by weight, 0.5% by weight≦Si≦1.5% by weight, 0.1% by weight≦Al≦1.0% by weight, rest iron.
The terms “essentially” and “consisting essentially of” denote that the composition contains the recited components, as well as any impurities which may be present, such as smelting impurities and the like, and any other components that do not affect the basic and novel characteristics of the alloy. The alloy preferably contains a maximum of 200 ppm of nitrogen, a maximum of 400 ppm of carbon and a maximum of 100 ppm of oxygen.
Compared to the binary Co—Fe alloy, the alloy according to the invention has a higher resistivity, resulting in a suppression of eddy currents combined with a minimum reduction of saturation polarisation. This is achieved by the addition of non-magnetic elements. As a result of its Al and Si content, the alloy further has a higher strength. This alloy is suitable for use as a magnet core of a high-speed actuator system, such as in a fuel injector of an internal combustion engine.
Cr and Mn significantly increase resistance while only slightly reducing saturation. At the same time, the annealing temperature, which corresponds to the upper limit of the ferritic phase, is reduced. This is, however, not desirable, as it results in poorer soft magnetic properties.
Al, V and Si likewise increase electric resistance while also increasing the annealing temperature. In this way, an alloy with a high resistance, high saturation and high annealing temperature and thus with good soft magnetic properties can be specified.
As a result of its Al and Si content, the alloy further has a higher strength. The alloy is suitable for cold forming and ductile in the finish-annealed state. The alloy may have an elongation AL>2%, preferably AL>20%. The elongation AL is measured in tensile tests. This alloy is suitable for use as a magnet core of a high-speed actuator system, such as in a fuel injector of an internal combustion engine.
A soft magnetic cobalt-iron-based alloy for an actuator system is subject to contradictory demands. A higher cobalt content in the binary alloy results in a higher saturation magnetisation Js of approximately 9 mT per 1% by weight of Co (based on 17% by weight of Co) and therefore permits a reduction in overall volume and increased system integration or higher actuating forces at the same overall volume. At the same time, however, the costs of the alloy increase. As the Co content increases, the soft magnetic properties of the alloy, such as permeability, become poorer. Above a Co content of 22% by weight, saturation is increased less by further Co additions.
The alloy should further have a high resistivity and good soft magnetic properties.
This alloy therefore has a cobalt content of 10% by weight≦Co≦22% by weight. A lower cobalt content reduces the raw material costs of the alloy, making it suitable for applications where costs are of great importance, such as automotive engineering. Maximum permeability is high within this range, resulting in advantageously low drive currents in actuator applications.
In further embodiments, the alloy has a cobalt content of 14% by weight≦Co≦22% by weight and 14% by weight≦Co≦20% by weight.
The soft magnetic alloy of the magnet core has a chromium and manganese content which results in a higher resistivity p in the annealed state accompanied by a slight reduction of saturation. This higher resistivity allows shorter switching times in an actuator, because eddy currents are reduced. At the same time, the alloy has a high saturation and a high permeability μmax,whereby good soft magnetic properties are maintained.
The alloy elements Si and Al improve the strength of the alloy without significantly reducing its soft magnetic properties. By the addition of Si and Al, the strength of the alloy can be increased noticeably as a result of solid-solution hardening without any significant reduction of its soft magnetic properties.
The aluminium content and the vanadium content according to the invention permit a higher annealing temperature, which improves the soft magnetic properties of coercitive field strength Hc and maximum permeability μmax. A high permeability is desirable, because it results in low drive currents if the alloy is used as a magnet core or flux conductor of an actuator.
In one embodiment, the alloy has a silicon content of 0.5% by weight≦Si≦1.0% by weight.
The Mo content was kept low to avoid the formation of carbides, which may adversely affect magnetic properties.
In addition of Cr and Mn, a minor addition of molybdenum is expedient, as this molybdenum content is characterised by an advantageous relationship between resistance increase and saturation reduction.
One embodiment has an aluminium plus silicon content of 0.6% by weight≦Al+Si≦1.5% by weight, whereby the brittleness and processing problems which may arise at a higher total aluminium plus silicon content are avoided.
One embodiment has a chromium plus manganese plus molybdenum plus aluminium plus silicon plus vanadium content of 4.0% by weight≦(Cr+Mn+Mo+Al+Si+V)≦9.0% by weight. Compared to the binary Co—Fe alloy, this alloy has a higher resistivity, resulting in a suppression of eddy currents, while saturation polarisation is reduced only minimally and coercitive field strength Hc is increased even less.
One embodiment has a chromium plus manganese plus molybdenum plus aluminium plus silicon plus vanadium content of 6.0% by weight≦Cr+Mn+Mo+Al+Si+V≦9.0% by weight.
In further embodiments, the soft magnetic alloy consists essentially of 10% by weight≦Co≦22% by weight, 0% by weight≦V≦1% by weight, 1.5% by weight≦Cr≦3% by weight, 1% by weight≦Mn≦2% by weight, 0% by weight≦Mo≦1% by weight, 0.5% by weight≦Si≦1.5% by weight, 0.1% by weight≦Al≦1.0% by weight, rest iron. It may have an aluminium plus silicon content of 0.6% by weight≦Al+Si≦1.5% by weight and/or a chromium plus manganese plus molybdenum plus aluminium plus silicon plus vanadium content of 4.5% by weight≦Cr+Mn+Mo+Al+Si+V≦6.0% by weight.
In one embodiment, the alloy consists essentially of V=0% by weight, 1.6% by weight≦Cr≦2.5% by weight, 1.25% by weight≦Mn≦1.5% by weight, 0% by weight≦Mo≦0.02% by weight, 0.6% by weight≦Si≦0.9% by weight and 0.2% by weight≦Al≦0.7% by weight.
In one embodiment, the alloy consists essentially of 0% by weight≦V≦2.0% by weight, 1.6% by weight≦Cr≦2.5% by weight, 1.25% by weight≦Mn≦1.5% by weight, 0% by weight≦Mo≦0.02% by weight, 0.6% by weight≦Si≦0.9% by weight and 0.2% by weight≦Al≦0.7% by weight.
In one embodiment, the alloy consists essentially of 0% by weight≦V≦0.01% by weight, 2.3% by weight≦Cr≦3.5% by weight, 1.25% by weight≦Mn≦1.5% by weight, 0.75% by weight≦Mo≦1% by weight, 0.6% by weight≦Si≦0.9% by weight and 0.1% by weight≦Al≦0.2% by weight.
In one embodiment, the alloy consists essentially of 0.75% by weight≦V≦2.75% by weight, 2.3% by weight≦Cr≦3.5% by weight, 1.25% by weight≦Mn≦1.5% by weight, 0% by weight≦Mo≦0.01% by weight, 0.6% by weight≦Si≦0.9% by weight and 0.2% by weight≦Al≦1.0% by weight.
These three alloys offer a preferred combination of high electric resistance, high saturation and low coercitive field strength.
Alloys of the above compositions have a resistivity ρ>0.50 μΩm or ρ>0.55 μΩm or ρ>0.60 μΩm or ρ>0.65 μΩm. This value provides for an alloy which generates low eddy currents when used as a magnet core of an actuator system. This permits the use of the alloy in actuator systems with higher switching times.
The proportion of the elements aluminium and silicon in the alloy according to the invention results in an alloy with a yield point of Rp0.2 of 340 MPa. This higher strength of the alloy can increase its service life when used as a magnet core of an actuator system. This is an attractive feature when using the alloy in high-frequency actuator systems, such as fuel injectors in internal combustion-engines.
The alloy according to the invention is characterised by good magnetic properties, high strength and high resistivity. In further embodiments, the alloy has a saturation J(400 A/cm)>2.00 T or >1.90 T and/or a coercitive field strength Hc<3.5 A/cm or Hc<2.0 cm and/or Hc<1.0 cm and a maximum permeability μmax>1000 or μmax>2000.
The chromium plus manganese plus molybdenum plus aluminium plus silicon plus vanadium content according to the invention lies in the range of 4.0% by weight to 9.0% by weight. This higher content provides for an alloy having a higher electric resistance ρ>0.6 μΩm and a low coercitive field strength Hc<2.0 A/cm. This combination of properties is particularly suitable for use in high-speed actuators.
The invention further provides for a soft magnetic core or flux conductor for an electromagnetic actuator made of an alloy according to any of the preceding embodiments. This soft magnetic core is available in various embodiments, such as a soft magnetic core for a solenoid valve of an internal combustion engine, a soft magnetic core for a fuel injector of an internal combustion engine, a soft magnetic core for a direct injector of a spark ignition engine or diesel engine or as a soft magnetic component for electromagnetic valve control, for example for inlet and outlet valves.
The various actuator systems, such as solenoid valves and fuel injectors, are subject to varying requirements in terms of strength and magnetic properties. These requirements can be met by selecting an alloy with a composition within the range described above.
The invention further provides for a fuel injector of an internal combustion engine with a component made of a soft magnetic alloy according to any of the preceding embodiments. In further embodiments, the fuel injector is a direct injector of a spark ignition engine or a direct injector of a diesel engine.
In further embodiments, the invention provides for a yoke part for an electromagnetic actuator, for a soft magnetic rotor and a soft magnetic stator for an electric motor and for a soft magnetic component for an electromagnetic valve control on an inlet valve or an outlet valve used in an engine compartment of, for example, a motor vehicle, all these being made of an alloy according to any of the preceding embodiments.
The invention further provides for a method for the production of semi-finished products from a cobalt-iron alloy, wherein melting and hot forming processes are first used to produce workpieces from a soft magnetic alloy consisting essentially of 10% by weight≦Co≦22% by weight, 0% by weight≦V≦4% by weight, 1.5% by weight≦Cr≦5% by weight, 1% by weight≦Mn≦2% by weight, 0% by weight≦Mo≦1% by weight, 0.5% by weight≦Si≦1.5% by weight, 0.1% by weight≦Al≦1.0% by weight, rest iron.
The alloy of the workpieces may alternatively have a composition according to any of the preceding embodiments.
The alloy can be melted using a variety of different methods. In theory, all commonly used technologies are feasible, including melting in the presence of air or by means of VIM (vacuum induction melting). An arc furnace or other inductive technologies can be used for this purpose. VOD (vacuum oxygen decarburisation), AOD (argon oxygen decarburisation) or ERP (electroslag remelting process) improves the quality of the product.
The VIM method is preferred for the production of the alloy, as it permits a more precise adjustment of the proportions of the alloy elements, and non-metallic inclusions in the solidified alloy are avoided more easily.
The melting process is followed by a variety of process steps depending on the semi-finished product to be produced.
In the production of strip from which components are subsequently punched, the ingot resulting from the melting process is first converted into a slab by blooming. The term blooming identifies the conversion of an ingot into a slab with a rectangular cross-section in a hot rolling process at a temperature of, for example, 1250° C. After the blooming process, the scale formed on the surface of the slab is removed by grinding. The grinding process is followed by a further hot rolling process in which the slab is converted into strip at a temperature of, for example, 1250° C. The impurities formed in the hot rolling process on the surface of the strip are then removed by grinding or pickling, and the strip is cold-rolled to its final thickness, which may be in the range of 0.1 mm to 2 mm. Finally, the strip is subjected to a finish-annealing process. During this finish-annealing process, the lattice vacancies caused by the forming processes are rectified, and crystalline grains form in the structure.
The process for producing turned components is similar. Here, too, billets with a square cross-section are produced by blooming the ingot. This so-called blooming is performed at a temperature of, for example, 1250° C. The scale produced in the blooming process is then removed by grinding. This is followed by a further hot rolling process whereby the billets are converted into bars or wires up to a diameter of, for example, 13 mm. Straightening and scalping processes then correct distortions in the material on the one hand and remove the impurities formed on the surface in the hot rolling process on the other hand. The material is finally likewise finish-annealed.
The finish-annealing process can be carried out in a temperature range between 700° C. and 1100° C. In one implementation, the finish-annealing process is carried out in a temperature range between 750° C. and 850° C. The finish-annealing process can be carried out in the presence of an inert gas or hydrogen or in a vacuum.
Conditions such as the temperature and duration of the finish-annealing process can be selected such that the finish-annealed alloy in a tensile test exhibits deformation parameters of an elongation AL>2% or AL>20%.
In a further implementation, the alloy is cold-formed prior to finish-annealing.
The invention is explained in greater detail with reference to the drawing.
A coil 22 is supplied with power from a power source 23, so that a magnetic field is induced as the coil 22 is excited. The coil 22 is arranged around the magnet core 21 such that the magnet core 21 is moved from a first position 24 indicated by a broken line in
In a further embodiment, the actuator system 20 is a fuel injector of a spark ignition engine or a diesel engine, or a direct injector of a spark ignition engine or a diesel engine.
The soft magnetic alloy of the magnet core 21 has a chromium plus manganese content resulting in the annealed state in a resistivity ρ of 0.572 μΩm. This higher resistivity allows for shorter switching times in the actuator, as eddy currents are reduced. At the same time, the alloy has a high saturation J(400 A/cm), measured at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, of 2.137 T and a permeability μmax of 1915, whereby good soft magnetic properties are maintained.
The alloy elements Si and Al improve the strength of the magnet core 21 without substantially affecting its soft magnetic properties. The yield point Rp0.2 of this alloy is 402 MPa. The aluminium content permits a higher annealing temperature, which results in good soft magnetic properties of a coercitive field strength Hc of only 2.57 A/cm and a maximum permeability μmax of 1915. A high permeability is desirable, because it results in lower drive currents when using the alloy as a magnet core of an actuator.
The Mo content was kept low to avoid the formation of carbides, which can lead to a deterioration of the magnetic properties.
Table 1 lists compositions of various exemplary alloys according to the invention.
From these alloys, semi-finished products were made using a method illustrated in the flow chart of
According to the flow chart of
Various methods can be used to melt the alloy. In theory, all commonly used technologies, such as melting in the presence of air or by means of VIM (vacuum induction melting), are feasible. Further possible technologies include the arc furnace or inductive technologies. VOD (vacuum oxygen decarburisation), AOD (argon oxygen decarburisation) or ERP (electroslag remelting process) improves the quality of the product.
The VIM method is preferred in the production of the alloy, as it permits a more precise adjustment of the proportions of the alloy elements, and non-metallic inclusions in the solidified alloy are avoided more easily.
Depending on the semi-finished product to be produced, the melting process is followed by a number of different process steps.
In the production of strip from which components are subsequently punched, the ingot resulting from the melting process 1 is first converted into a slab by blooming 2. The term blooming identifies the conversion of an ingot into a slab with a rectangular cross-section in a hot rolling process at a temperature of 1250° C. After the blooming process, the scale formed on the surface of the slab is removed by grinding 3. The grinding process 3 is followed by a further hot rolling process 4 in which the slab is converted into strip with a thickness of, for example, 3.5 mm at a temperature of 1250° C. The impurities formed in the hot rolling process on the surface of the strip are then removed by grinding or pickling 5, and the strip is cold-rolled 6 to its final thickness in the range of 0.1 mm to 2 mm. Finally, the strip is subjected to a finish-annealing process 7 at a temperature of >700° C. During this finish-annealing process, the lattice vacancies caused by the forming processes are rectified, and crystalline grains form in the structure.
The process for producing turned components is similar. Here, too, billets with a square cross-section are produced by blooming 8 the ingot. This so-called blooming is performed at a temperature of 1250° C. The scale produced in the blooming process 8 is then removed by grinding 9. This is followed by a further hot rolling process 10 whereby the billets are converted into bars or wires up to a diameter of 13 mm. Straightening and scalping processes 11 then correct distortions in the material on the one hand and remove the impurities formed on the surface in the hot rolling process 10 on the other hand. The material is finally likewise finish-annealed 12.
The coercitive field strength Hc was measured in dependence on annealing temperature for the alloys of Table 1. The results are illustrated in
The selected annealing temperature is determined by composition, so that the coercitive field strength remains low. The alloy 3 described with reference to
The alloys 2, 10, 11 and 13 with a lower Hc at higher annealing temperatures have an aluminium content of at least 0.68% by weight. The alloys 10 and 11 have a particularly low coercitive field strength Hc of less than 1.5 A/cm at annealing temperatures above 850° C. These alloys have an aluminium content of 0.84% by weight and 0.92% by weight respectively and a vanadium content of 2.51% by weight and 1.00% by weight respectively.
In these alloys, the phase transition temperature becomes even higher. This offers the advantage that the magnetic properties can be improved even further by using a higher annealing temperature.
The following properties: resistivity in the annealed state ρel, coercitive field strength Hc, saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) and a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm), maximum permeability μmax, yield point Rm, Rp0.2, elongation AL and modulus of elasticity were measured for the alloys of Table 1 and are summarised in Table 2.
The resistivity p of each alloy lies above 0.5 μΩm. This results in a suppression of eddy currents, making the alloys suitable for application as actuators with short switching times. The yield point for the alloys 1 to 7 was measured in the finish-annealed state and lies above 340 MPa for each alloy. These alloys can therefore be used in applications involving higher mechanical loads.
Table 2 indicates that the alloys, notwithstanding the high proportion of non-magnetic elements added, have a high saturation J(400 A/cm)>2.0 T, a high resistivity ρ>0.5 μΩm and a high yield point Rp0.2, >340 MPa. These alloys are therefore particularly suitable for magnet cores in high-speed actuator systems, such as fuel injectors.
An alloy according to a first embodiment consists essentially of 18.1% by weight Co, 2.24% by weight Cr, 1.40% by weight Mn, 0.01% by weight Mo, 0.83% by weight Si, 0.24% by weight Al, rest iron and was produced as described above. The alloy was annealed at 760° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.542 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 2.34 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 2.029 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.146 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 2314, a yield point Rm of 623 MPa, Rp0.2 of 411 MPa, an elongation AL of 29.6% and a modulus of elasticity of 220 GPa.
An alloy according to a second embodiment consists essentially of 18.2% by weight Co, 1.67% by weight Cr, 1.39% by weight Mn, 0.01% by weight Mo, 0.82% by weight Si, 0.68% by weight Al, rest iron and was produced as described above. The alloy was annealed at 800° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.533 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 1.94 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 2.019 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.151 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 1815, a yield point Rm of 661 MPa, Rp0.2 of 385 MPa, an elongation AL of 25.4% and a modulus of elasticity of 221 GPa.
An alloy according to a third embodiment consists essentially of 18.3% by weight Co, 2.62% by weight Cr, 1.37% by weight Mn, 0.01% by weight Mo, 0.85% by weight Si, 0.21% by weight Al, rest iron and was produced as described above. The alloy was annealed at 760° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.572 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 2.57 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 2.021 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.137 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 1915, a yield point Rm of 632 MPa, Rp0.2 of 402 MPa, an elongation AL of 28.0% and a modulus of elasticity of 217 GPa.
An alloy according to a fourth embodiment consists essentially of 18.3% by weight Co, 2.42% by weight Cr, 1.45% by weight Mn, 0.01% by weight Mo, 0.67% by weight Si, 0.23% by weight Al, rest iron and was produced as described above. The alloy was annealed at 730° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.546 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 2.73 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 2.037 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.156 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 2046, a yield point Rm of 605 MPa, Rp0.2 of 395 MPa, an elongation AL of 29.5% and a modulus of elasticity of 223 GPa.
An alloy according to a fifth embodiment consists essentially of 15.40% by weight Co, 2.34% by weight Cr, 1.27% by weight Mn, 0.85% by weight Si, 0.23% by weight Al, rest iron and was produced as described above. The alloy was annealed at 760° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.5450 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 1.30 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 1.986 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.105 T and a maximum permeability μmax of 3241.
An alloy according to a sixth embodiment consists essentially of 18.10% by weight Co, 2.30% by weight Cr, 1.37% by weight Mn, 0.83% by weight Si, 0.24% by weight Al, rest iron and was produced as described above. The alloy was annealed at 760° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.5591 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 1.39 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 2.027 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.138 T and a maximum permeability μmax of 2869.
An alloy according to a seventh embodiment consists essentially of 21.15% by weight Co, 2.31% by weight Cr, 1.38% by weight Mn, 0.84% by weight Si, 0.23% by weight Al, rest iron and was produced as described above. The alloy was annealed at 760° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.5627 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 1.93 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 2.066 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.165 T and a maximum permeability μmax of 1527.
The eighth to thirteenth embodiments contain slightly more added elements in total, i.e. between 6 and 9% by weight. In the annealed state, these alloys have a resistivity ρel≧0.60 μΩm.
An alloy according to an eighth embodiment consists essentially of 18.0% by weight Co, 2.66% by weight Cr, 1.39% by weight Mn, 0.01% by weight Mo, 0.87% by weight Si, 0.17% by weight Al, 1.00% by weight V, rest iron and was produced as described above. This alloy was cold-formed after hot rolling. The alloy was annealed at 780° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.627 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 1.40 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 1.977 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.088 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 2862, a yield point Rm of 605 MPa, Rp0.2 of 374 MPa, an elongation AL of 29.7% and a modulus of elasticity of 222 GPa.
An alloy according to a ninth embodiment consists essentially of 18.0% by weight Co, 2.60% by weight Cr, 1.35% by weight Mn, 0.99% by weight Mo, 0.84% by weight Si, 0.17% by weight Al, ≦0.01% by weight V, rest iron and was produced as described above. This alloy was cold-formed in addition. The alloy was annealed at 780° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.604 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 2.13 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 1.969 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.092 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 1656, a yield point Rm of 636 MPa, Rp0.2 of 389 MPa, an elongation AL of 29.2% and a modulus of elasticity of 222 GPa.
An alloy according to a tenth embodiment consists essentially of 18.0% by weight Co, 1.85% by weight Cr, 1.33% by weight Mn, ≦0.01% by weight Mo, 0.86% by weight Si, 0.84% by weight Al, 2.51% by weight V, rest iron and was produced as described above. This alloy was then cold-formed. The alloy was annealed at 870° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.716 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 0.95 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 1.920 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.015 T and a maximum permeability μmax of 4038.
This alloy of the tenth embodiment offers a particularly advantageous combination of a high resistivity ρel of 0.716 μΩm, a low coercitive field strength Hc of 0.95 A/cm and a high saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 1.920 T.
An alloy according to an eleventh embodiment consists essentially of 12.0% by weight Co, 2.65% by weight Cr, 1.38% by weight Mn, ≦0.01% by weight Mo, 0.85% by weight Si, 0.92% by weight Al, 1.00% by weight V, rest iron and was produced as described above and then cold-formed. The alloy was annealed at 820° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.658 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 0.72 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 1.880 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 2.008 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 5590, a yield point Rm of 525 MPa, Rp0.2 of 346 MPa, an elongation AL of 33.5% and a modulus of elasticity of 216 GPa.
This alloy of the eleventh embodiment offers a particularly advantageous combination of a high resistivity ρel of 0.658 μΩm, a low coercitive field strength Hc of 0.72 A/cm and a high saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 1.880 T.
having a Co content of more than 22% by weight, the twelfth alloy does not correspond to the invention.
An alloy according to a thirteenth embodiment consists essentially of 18.0% by weight Co, 3.00% by weight Cr, 1.32% by weight Mn, <0.01% by weight Mo, 0.86% by weight Si, 0.84% by weight Al, 2.01% by weight V, rest iron and was produced as described above and then cold-formed after hot rolling. The alloy was annealed at 820° C. and in the annealed state has a resistivity ρel of 0.769 μΩm, a coercitive field strength Hc of 1.14 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm) of 1.896 T and at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm) of 1.985 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 3499, a yield point Rm of 674 MPa, Rp0.2 of 396 MPa, an elongation AL of 33.3% and a modulus of elasticity of 218 GPa.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2006 051 715 | Oct 2006 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2225730 | Armstrong | Dec 1940 | A |
2926008 | Barnett et al. | Feb 1960 | A |
2960744 | Blank | Nov 1960 | A |
3255512 | Lochner et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3337373 | Foster et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3401035 | Moskowitz et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
3502462 | Dabkowski et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3624568 | Olsen et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3634072 | Ackemann et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3977919 | Foster et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4059462 | Masumoto et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4076525 | Little et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4076861 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4120704 | Anderson | Oct 1978 | A |
4160066 | Szumachowski et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4201837 | Lupinski | May 1980 | A |
4601765 | Soileau et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4891079 | Nakajima et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4923533 | Shigeta et al. | May 1990 | A |
4950550 | Radeloff et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4969963 | Honkura et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4994122 | DeBold et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5069731 | Yoshizawa et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5091024 | DeBold et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5200002 | Hilzinger | Apr 1993 | A |
5202088 | Genma et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5261152 | Simozaki et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268044 | Hemphill et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5501747 | Masteller et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5522946 | Tomita et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534081 | Takagi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5594397 | Uchikoba et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611871 | Yoshizawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5703559 | Emmerich et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5714017 | Tomida et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725686 | Yoshizawa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741374 | Li | Apr 1998 | A |
5769974 | Masteller et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5804282 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817191 | Emmerich et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5911840 | Couderchon et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914088 | Rao et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922143 | Verin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5976274 | Inoue et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6118365 | Petzold et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6171408 | Herzer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181509 | Canlas et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6270592 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6373368 | Shikama et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6462456 | DeCristofaro et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6507262 | Otte et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6563411 | Otte et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6588093 | Emmerich et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616125 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6685882 | Deevi et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6710692 | Kato et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6749767 | Mitani et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6942741 | Shimao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946097 | Deevi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962144 | Chretien et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7128790 | Waeckerle et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7442263 | Günther et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7532099 | Brunner | May 2009 | B2 |
7563331 | Petzold et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20020062885 | Li | May 2002 | A1 |
20020158540 | Lindquist et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030034091 | Shimao et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040027220 | Günther et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040089377 | Deevi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099347 | Waeckerle et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112468 | Petzold et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040183643 | Brunner | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050017587 | Koenig | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050268994 | Gerster et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070029013 | Waeckerle et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070176025 | Gerster | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080042505 | Gerster et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080099106 | Pieper et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136570 | Gerster | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090039994 | Pieper et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090184790 | Pieper et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
668331 | Dec 1988 | CH |
1185012 | Jun 1998 | CN |
694374 | Jul 1940 | DE |
2816173 | Oct 1979 | DE |
3324729 | Jan 1984 | DE |
3237183 | Apr 1984 | DE |
3427716 | Nov 1985 | DE |
3542257 | Jun 1987 | DE |
4030791 | Aug 1991 | DE |
4442420 | May 1996 | DE |
4444482 | Jun 1996 | DE |
19635257 | Mar 1998 | DE |
19802349 | Jul 1998 | DE |
19844132 | Apr 1999 | DE |
19818198 | Oct 1999 | DE |
19928764 | Jan 2001 | DE |
69611610 | Jul 2001 | DE |
10024824 | Nov 2001 | DE |
10031923 | Jan 2002 | DE |
69903202 | Jun 2003 | DE |
10211511 | Oct 2003 | DE |
10320350 | Sep 2004 | DE |
0216457 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0299498 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0429022 | May 1991 | EP |
0271657 | May 1992 | EP |
0635853 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0637038 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0715320 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0804796 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0824755 | Feb 1998 | EP |
1124999 | Aug 2001 | EP |
0771466 | Sep 2002 | EP |
1475450 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1503486 | Feb 2005 | EP |
833446 | Apr 1960 | GB |
1369844 | Oct 1974 | GB |
51092097 | Feb 1975 | JP |
54006808 | Jun 1977 | JP |
59058813 | Apr 1984 | JP |
59177902 | Oct 1984 | JP |
61058450 | Mar 1986 | JP |
61253348 | Nov 1986 | JP |
62-93342 | Apr 1987 | JP |
62093342 | Apr 1987 | JP |
1247557 | Mar 1989 | JP |
02301544 | Dec 1990 | JP |
03-146615 | Jun 1991 | JP |
05283238 | Oct 1993 | JP |
05-299232 | Nov 1993 | JP |
6033199 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06-224023 | Aug 1994 | JP |
08-246109 | Sep 1996 | JP |
63021807 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10-092623 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-097913 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2000-182845 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-27735 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2000-277357 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001-068324 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002294408 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2006193779 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006322057 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007113148 | May 2007 | JP |
1062298 | Jul 1982 | SU |
WO 9619001 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 0100895 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0186665 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 02055749 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 03003385 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2007088513 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090145522 A9 | Jun 2009 | US |