1. Field
Disclosed herein are soft magnetic iron/cobalt/chromium-based alloys and processes for manufacturing semi-finished products from these alloys, in particular magnetic components for actuator systems.
2. Description of Related Art
Certain soft magnetic iron/cobalt/chromium-based alloys are disclosed in DE 44 42 420 A1, for example. Such alloys can have high saturation magnetisation and can therefore be used to develop electromagnetic actuator systems with high forces and/or small dimensions. A typical use of these alloys is as cores for solenoid valves, such as for example solenoid valves for fuel injection in internal combustion engines, or as armatures in electrical motors.
Material machinability is an important factor in the manufacture of parts to be used as soft magnetic parts for actuators. It has been shown that iron/cobalt/chromium-based alloys present high levels of wear when subjected to chip-removing machining processes. This can be shown by the quality of the machined surface. In certain applications better surface quality is desirable.
Improving the machinability of iron-based alloys through the addition by alloying of elements such as Mn, S and Pb is already known. However, these elements can present the disadvantage that, as described in “Soft Magnetic Materials II Influence of Sulfur on Initial Permeability of Commercial 49% Ni—Fe alloys”, D. A. Coiling et al, J. Appl. Phys. 40 (19 69) 1571, for example, they can reduce the magnetic properties of soft magnetic alloys.
One object of the invention disclosed herein is therefore to provide an iron/cobalt/chromium-based alloy which has improved machinability and good soft magnetic properties.
This object is achieved in the invention by means of the subject matter disclosed herein.
In one embodiment, the invention relates to a soft magnetic alloy consists essentially of 5 percent by weight≦Co≦30 percent by weight, 1 percent by weight≦Cr≦20 percent by weight, 0.1 percent by weight≦Al≦2 percent by weight, 0 percent by weight≦Si≦1.5 percent by weight, 0.017 percent by weight≦Mn≦0.2 percent by weight, 0.01 percent by weight≦S≦0.05 percent by weight where Mn/S>1.7, 0 percent by weight≦O≦0.0015 percent by weight, and 0.0003 percent by weight≦Ce≦0.05 percent by weight, 0 percent by weight≦Ca≦0.005 percent by weight where 0.117 percent by weight≦(Al+Si+Mn+V+Mo+W+Nb+Ti+Ni)≦5 percent by weight, and the remainder iron.
The alloy disclosed herein has a certain manganese and sulphur content. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that these two elements give the alloy improved machinability. The alloy also has a certain cerium content. Again, without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the combination of sulphur, manganese und cerium gives a soft magnetic alloy with better machinability than a sulphur-free alloy, whilst at the same time retaining soft magnetic properties, such as the magnetic properties of a sulphur-free alloy.
Another embodiment provides for a soft magnetic core for an electromagnetic actuator made of an alloy in accordance with one or more of the preceding embodiments. In various embodiments this soft magnetic core is a soft magnetic core for a solenoid valve of an internal combustion engine, a soft magnetic core for a fuel injection valve of an internal combustion engine and a soft magnetic core for a direct fuel injection valve of a spark ignition engine or a diesel engine.
Another embodiment provides for a soft magnetic armature for an electric motor which is also manufactured from an alloy as disclosed in one of the preceding embodiments. The various actuator systems such as solenoid valves and fuel injection valves have different requirements in terms of strength and magnetic properties. These requirements can be met by selecting an alloy with a composition which lies within the ranges described above.
Another embodiment provides for a fuel injection valve of an internal combustion engine with a component made of a soft magnetic alloy in accordance with one of the preceding embodiments. In further versions the fuel injection valve is a direct fuel injection valve of a spark ignition engine and a direct fuel injection valve of a diesel engine.
Another embodiment provides for a soft magnetic armature for an electric motor comprising an alloy in accordance with one of the preceding embodiments.
Another embodiment provides for a process for manufacturing semi-finished products from a cobalt/iron alloy in which workpieces are manufactured initially by melting and hot forming a soft magnetic alloy which consists essentially of 5 percent by weight≦Co≦30 percent by weight, 1 percent by weight≦Cr≦20 percent by weight, 0.1 percent by weight≦Al≦2 percent by weight, 0 percent by weight≦Si≦1.5 percent by weight, 0.017 percent by weight≦Mn≦0.2 percent by weight, 0.01 percent by weight≦S≦0.05 percent by weight where Mn/S is >1.7, 0 percent by weight≦O≦0.0015 percent by weight and 0.0003 percent by weight≦Ce≦0.05 percent by weight, 0 percent by weight≦Ca≦0.005 percent by weight where 0.117 percent by weight≦(Al+Si+Mn+V+Mo+W+Nb+Ti+Ni)≦5 percent by weight, and the remainder iron. A final annealing process can be carried out.
The term “essentially” indicates the inclusion of incidental impurities.
Sulphur is almost insoluble in iron. Iron sulphide forms a low-melting point eutectic (Ts=1188° C.) which settles on the grain boundaries and can lead to red shorting during hot rolling at 800° C. to 1000° C. Oxygen reduces the eutectic temperature even further. If manganese is also added from a ratio of Mn/S>1.7, corresponding to a ratio of 1:1 atom percent, all the sulphur is bound to the MnS which melts at 1600° C. MnS has a significantly higher melting point than FeS and after rolling is elongated and forms bands. Manganese sulphides have a lubricating effect on the cutting wedge and form imperfections in the steel which can lead to shorter chips. Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is suggested that MnS precipitates have a similar function in the alloy disclosed in the invention since the machinability of the alloy is improved.
Microstructure analyses in combination with EDX analyses of the alloy disclosed in the invention demonstrate that it has finely distributed manganese sulphide precipitates. In alloys without the addition by alloying of cerium coarser manganese sulphide precipitates are shown.
Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is suggested that the finer distribution of manganese sulphide precipitates does not lead to a deterioration in magnetic properties. One possible reason for this difference lies in the fact that the cerium content provides nuclei to which the manganese sulphide precipitates form, thereby leading to a finer distribution of the precipitates.
At the same time machinability is improved in comparison to a sulphur-free alloy. This can be shown by light-optical microscopy of the finish turned surface. Light-optical microscopy analysis of the alloys disclosed in the invention and sulphur-free comparative alloys show that the surface of the alloys disclosed in the invention is significantly more homogenous that that of an alloy with manganese sulphide precipitates which has no cerium.
In a particular embodiment, the alloy disclosed herein contains cerium but no calcium. In a second embodiment the alloy disclosed in the invention has cerium and calcium, wherein the amount of calcium, Ca is such that 0.001 percent by weight being ≦Ca≦0.005 percent by weight.
An alloy with a combination of Ce, Ca and S is also found to show soft magnetic properties corresponding to the soft magnetic properties of a comparable sulphur-free alloy, and improved machinability.
In a further particular embodiment the alloy has Ce and Ca, 0.001 percent by weight≦Ca≦0.005 percent by weight. In further embodiments, which can be either calcium-free or contain calcium, the maximum cerium content is reduced. In these embodiments 0.001 percent by weight≦Ce≦0.02 percent by weight or 0.001 percent by weight≦Ce≦0.005 percent by weight.
In other particular embodiments, the cobalt content, chromium content and/or manganese content is specified more particularly. The alloy may have a cobalt content of 8 percent by weight≦Co≦22 percent by weight, or 14 percent by weight≦Co≦20 percent by weight, and/or a chromium content of 1.5 percent by weight≦Cr≦3 percent by weight, or 6 percent by weight≦Cr≦15 percent by weight.
Alloys with the aforementioned compositions have a specific electrical resistance of ρ>0.40 μΩm or ρ>0.60 μΩm. This value provides an alloy which leads to lower eddy currents when used as a magnet core in an actuator system. This permits the use of the alloy in actuator systems with faster switching times.
In a particular embodiment, the apparent yielding point is Rp0.2>280 MPa. This greater alloy strength can lengthen the service life of the alloy when used as the magnet core in an actuator system. This is attractive when the alloy is used in high frequency actuator systems such as fuel injection valves in internal combustion engines.
The alloy disclosed herein has good soft magnetic properties, good strength and a high specific electrical resistance. In further embodiments the alloy has a coercive field strength of Hc<5.0 A/cm or Hc<2.0 A/cm and/or a maximum permeability μmax of >1000. This combination of high specific resistance, low coercive field strength and good machinability is particularly advantageous in soft magnetic parts of an actuator system or an electric motor.
This alloy can be melted by means of various different processes. All current techniques including air melting and Vacuum Induction Melting (VIM), for example, are possible in theory. In addition, an arc furnace or inductive techniques may also be used. Treatment by Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization (VOD) or Argon Oxygen Decarburization (AOD) or Electro Slag Remelting (ESR) improves the quality of the product.
The VIM process is the preferred process for manufacturing the alloy since using this process it is on one hand possible to set the contents of the alloy elements more precisely and on the other easier to avoid non-metallic inclusions in the solidified alloy.
Depending on the semi-finished products to be manufactured, the melting process is followed by a range of different process steps.
If strips are to be manufactured for subsequent pressing into parts, the ingot produced in the melting process is formed by blooming into a slab ingot. Blooming refers to the forming of the ingot into a slab ingot with a rectangular cross section by a hot rolling process at a temperature of 1250° C., for example. After blooming, any scale formed on the surface of the slab ingot is removed by grinding. Grinding is followed by a further hot rolling process by means of which the slab ingot is formed into a strip at a temperature of 1250° C., for example. Any impurities which have formed on the surface of the strip during hot rolling are then removed by grinding or pickling, and the strip is formed to its final thickness which may be within a range of 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm by cold rolling. Ultimately, the strip is subjected to a final annealing process. During this final annealing any lattice imperfections produced during the various forming processes are removed and crystal grains are formed in the structure.
The manufacturing process for producing turned parts is similar. Here, too, the ingot is bloomed to produce billets of quadratic cross-section. On this occasion, the so-called blooming process takes place at a temperature of 1250° C., for example. The scale produced during blooming is then removed by grinding. This is followed by a further hot rolling process in which the billets are formed into rods or wires with a diameter of up to 13 mm, for example. Faults in the material are then corrected and any impurities formed on the surface during the hot rolling process removed by planishing and pre-turning. In this case, too, the material is then subjected to a final annealing process.
The final annealing process can be carried out within a temperature range of 700° C. to 1100° C. In one embodiment, final annealing is carried out within a temperature range of 750° C. to 850° C. The final annealing process may be carried out in inert gas, in hydrogen or in a vacuum.
In a further particular embodiment the alloy is cold formed prior to final annealing.
The invention is explained in greater detail with reference to the drawings, which are intended as an aid in understanding the invention, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention or of the appended claims.
The compositions of two alloys as disclosed in the invention and two comparison alloys are summarised in Table 1.
Alloy (1) is a comparison alloy which does not contain, or contains only very small amounts of, sulphur. However, alloy (1) does contain Ce and consists of 16.45 percent by weight Co, 2.06 percent by weight Cr, 0.05 percent by weight Mn, 0.49 percent by weight Si, 0.19 percent by weight Al, 0.0010 percent by weight O, less than 0.003 percent by weight S, 0.002 percent by weight Ce and the remainder iron.
Alloy (2) is disclosed in the invention and thus contains sulphur, S, cerium, Ce, and Calcium, Ca. The composition of alloy (2) is 16.45 percent by weight Co, 2.05 percent by weight Cr, 0.05 percent by weight Mn, 0.44 percent by weight Si, 0.17 percent by weight Al, 0.0012 percent by weight O, 0.028 percent by weight S, 0.05 percent by weight Ce, 2 ppm Ca and the remainder iron.
The properties of specific electrical resistance ρel, coercive field strength Hc, saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm), saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm), maximum permeability μmax, apparent yielding point Rp0.2 and elongation at rupture AL of alloys (1 and 2) are summarised in Table 2.
Comparison alloy (1) has a specific electrical resistance ρel of 0.430 μΩm, a coercive field strength Hc of 0.90 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm), of 2.00 T, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm), of 2.19 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 4016, an apparent yielding point Rp0.2 of 233 MPa and an elongation at rupture AL of 22.7%.
Alloy (2) as disclosed in the invention has a specific electrical resistance ρel of 0.422 μΩm, a coercive field strength Hc of 1.18 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm), of 2.03 T, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm), of 2.18 T, a maximum permeability μmax of 4376, an apparent yielding point Rp0.2 of 296 MPa and an elongation at rupture AL of 22.4%.
A comparison of these values shows that alloy (2) as disclosed in the invention and which contains sulphur, cerium and calcium has similar soft magnetic properties to the sulphur-free comparison alloy (1). Consequently, the sulphur content does not lead to a reduction in soft magnetic properties as is the case in the iron-based alloys representing the prior art.
The machinability of these alloys was examined using scanning electron microscopy and light-optical microscopy. Alloy (2) as disclosed in the invention shows significantly less wear during machining. Similarly, the quality of the surface of alloy (2) as disclosed in the invention is improved.
Alloy (2) was also examined using Energy Dispersive X-Ray (EDX) analysis. This examination shows that alloy (2) has finely distributed manganese sulphide precipitates. These examinations also show that cerium is located in the core of these precipitates. Thus, without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is also suggested that the fine distribution of the manganese sulphides precipitates is achieved through the addition by alloying of cerium. It is also suggested that this fine distribution of manganese sulphide precipitates is responsible for the improved machinability but not for reducing its magnetic properties.
Table 1 summarises the composition of two further alloys (3 and 4). In comparison to alloys (1 and 2), alloys (3 and 4) have less Co and a greater Cr content and a greater Al content.
Alloy (3) is a comparison alloy which does not contain sulphur. Alloy (3) consists of 9.20 percent by weight Co, 13.10 percent by weight Cr, 0.26 percent by weight Al and the remainder iron.
Alloy (4) is disclosed in the invention and thus contains S and Ce. The composition of alloy (4) is 9.25 percent by weight Co, 13.20 percent by weight Cr, 0.08 percent by weight Mn, 0.27 percent by weight Al, 0.043 percent by weight S, 0.01 percent by weight Ce and the remainder iron.
In comparison to alloy (2) as disclosed in the invention, alloy (4) has a higher S content and a higher Ce content, but contains no Ca.
Electrical and magnetic properties of alloys (3 and 4) are summarised in Table 3.
Comparison alloy (3) has a specific electrical resistance ρel of 0.6377 μΩm, a coercive field strength Hc of 1.4 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 100 A/cm, J(100 A/cm), of 1.68 T, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm), of 1.76 T, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 200 A/cm, J(200 A/cm), of 1.79 T, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm), of 1.82 T and a maximum permeability μmax of 4066.
Alloy (4) as disclosed in the invention has a specific electrical resistance ρel of 0.6409 μm, a coercive field strength Hc of 1.7 A/cm, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength 100 A/cm, J(100 A/cm), of 1.68 T, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 160 A/cm, J(160 A/cm), of 1.75 T, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 200 A/cm, J(200 A/cm), of 1.78 T, a saturation J at a magnetic field strength of 400 A/cm, J(400 A/cm), of 1.81 T and a maximum permeability μmax of 2955.
As in alloys (1 and 2), a comparison of these values for alloys (3 and 4) shows that alloy (4) as disclosed in the invention and which contains sulphur and cerium has similar soft magnetic properties to the sulphur-free comparison alloy (3). In this basic composition the sulphur content once again does not lead to a reduction in soft magnetic properties as is the case in the iron-based alloy representing the prior art.
The strength properties of alloys (3 and 4) are summarised in Table 4.
Comparison alloy (3) has a tensile strength Rm of 493 MPa, an apparent yielding point Rp0.1 of 290 MPa and Rp0.2 of 298 MPa, an elongation at rupture AL of 18.84%, a pyramid hardness HV of 151, a constriction Z of 83.08% and a modulus of elasticity of 132 GPa.
Alloy (4) as disclosed in the invention has a tensile strength Rm of 561 MPa, an apparent yielding point Rp0.1 of 333 MPa and Rp0.2 of 341 MPa, an elongation at rupture AL of 19.30%, a pyramid hardness HV of 164, a constriction Z of 79.94% and a modulus of elasticity of 148 GPa.
A comparison of these values shows that the alloy with MnS precipitates disclosed in the invention has better mechanical properties than the sulphur-free comparison alloy (3). Semi-finished products are manufactured from this alloy as disclosed in the invention by means of a process illustrated in the flow diagram shown in
In the flow chart illustrated in
This alloy can be melted by means of various different processes. All current techniques including air melting and Vacuum Induction Melting (VIM), for example, are possible in theory. In addition, an arc furnace or inductive techniques may also be used. Treatment by Vacuum Oxygen Decarburization (VOD) or Argon Oxygen Decarburization (AOD) or Electro Slag Remelting (ESR) improves the quality of the product.
The VIM process is the preferred process for manufacturing the alloy since using this process it is on one hand possible to set the contents of the alloy elements more precisely and on the other easier to avoid non-metallic inclusions in the solidified alloy.
Depending on the semi-finished products to be manufactured, the melting process can be followed by a range of different process steps.
If strips are to be manufactured for subsequent pressing into parts, the ingot produced in the melting process (1) is formed by blooming (2) into a slab ingot. Blooming refers to the forming of the ingot into a slab ingot with a rectangular cross section by a hot rolling process at a temperature of 1250° C., for example. After blooming, any scale formed on the surface of the slab ingot is removed by grinding (3). Grinding (3) is followed by a further hot rolling process (4) by means of which the slab ingot is formed into a strip with a thickness of 3.5 mm, for example, at a temperature of 1250° C. Any impurities which have formed on the surface of the strip during hot rolling are then removed by grinding or pickling (5), and the strip is formed to its final thickness which can be within a range of 0.1 mm to 0.2 mm by cold rolling (6). Ultimately, the strip is subjected to a final annealing process (7) at a temperature of 850° C. During this final annealing, any lattice imperfections produced during the various forming processes are removed and crystal grains are formed in the structure.
The manufacturing process for producing turned parts is similar. Here, too, the ingot is bloomed (8) to produce billets of quadratic cross-section. On this occasion, the so-called blooming process takes place at a temperature of 1250° C., for example. The scale produced during blooming (8) is then removed by grinding (9). This is followed by a further hot rolling process (10) in which the billets are formed into rods or wires with a diameter of up to 13 mm, for example. Faults in the material are then corrected and any impurities formed on the surface during the hot rolling process removed by planishing and pre-turning. In this case, too, the material is then subjected to a final annealing process.
In a second embodiment the soft magnetic alloy of the magnetic core (21) consists essentially of 9.25 percent by weight Co, 13.20 percent by weight Cr, 0.08 percent by weight Mn, 0.27 percent by weight Al, 0.043 percent by weight S, 0.01 percent by weight Ce and the remainder iron. Other alloys within the scope of the disclosure herein can be used to form the magnetic core (21).
A coil (22) is supplied with current from a current source (23) such that when the coil (22) is excited a magnetic field is induced. The coil (22) is positioned around the magnet core (21) in such a manner that the magnet core (21) moves from a first position (24) illustrated by the broken line in
In further embodiments the actuator system (20) is a fuel injection valve of a spark ignition engine or a diesel engine or a direct fuel injection valve of a spark ignition engine or a diesel engine. Such an actuator system can be produced according to the disclosure provided above.
The invention having been described by reference to certain of its specific embodiments, it will be recognized that departures from these embodiments can be made within the spirit and scope of the invention, and that these specific embodiments are not limiting of the appended claims.
This application claims benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/935,146, filed Jul. 27, 2007, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2225730 | Armstrong | Dec 1940 | A |
2926008 | Barnett et al. | Feb 1960 | A |
2960744 | Blank | Nov 1960 | A |
3255512 | Lochner et al. | Jun 1966 | A |
3337373 | Foster et al. | Aug 1967 | A |
3401035 | Moskowitz et al. | Sep 1968 | A |
3502462 | Dabkowski et al. | Mar 1970 | A |
3624568 | Olsen et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3634072 | Ackemann et al. | Jan 1972 | A |
3977919 | Foster et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4059462 | Masumoto et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4076525 | Little et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4076861 | Furukawa et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4120704 | Anderson | Oct 1978 | A |
4160066 | Szumachowski et al. | Jul 1979 | A |
4201837 | Lupinski | May 1980 | A |
4601765 | Soileau et al. | Jul 1986 | A |
4891079 | Nakajima et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4923533 | Shigeta et al. | May 1990 | A |
4950550 | Radeloff et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4969963 | Honkura et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4994122 | DeBold et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5069731 | Yoshizawa et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5091024 | DeBold et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5200002 | Hilzinger | Apr 1993 | A |
5202088 | Genma et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5261152 | Simozaki et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5268044 | Hemphill et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5501747 | Masteller et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5522946 | Tomita et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5534081 | Takagi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5594397 | Uchikoba et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5611871 | Yoshizawa et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5703559 | Emmerich et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5714017 | Tomida et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5725686 | Yoshizawa et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5741374 | Li | Apr 1998 | A |
5769974 | Masteller et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5783145 | Coutu et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5804282 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5817191 | Emmerich et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5911840 | Couderchon et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5914088 | Rao et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5922143 | Verin et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5976274 | Inoue et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6001272 | Ikuma et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6106376 | Rybak et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118365 | Petzold et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6171408 | Herzer et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6181509 | Canlas et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6270592 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6373368 | Shikama et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6462456 | DeCristofaro et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6507262 | Otte et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6563411 | Otte et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6588093 | Emmerich et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6616125 | Brown et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6685882 | Deevi et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6710692 | Kato et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6749767 | Mitani et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6942741 | Shimao et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6946097 | Deevi et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6962144 | Chretien et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7128790 | Waeckerle et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7442263 | Günther et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7532099 | Brunner | May 2009 | B2 |
7563331 | Petzold et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
20010015239 | Kanekiyo | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010031837 | Perez et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020062885 | Li | May 2002 | A1 |
20020158540 | Lindquist et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030034091 | Shimao et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040027220 | Günther et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040089377 | Deevi et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040099347 | Waeckerle et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040112468 | Petzold et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040183643 | Brunner | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050017587 | Koenig | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050268994 | Gerster et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20070176025 | Gerster | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080042505 | Gerster et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080099106 | Pieper et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080136570 | Gester | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090039994 | Pieper et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090145522 | Pieper et al. | Jun 2009 | A9 |
20090206975 | Nuetzel et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100018610 | Petzold et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
668331 | Dec 1988 | CH |
1185012 | Jun 1998 | CN |
694374 | Jul 1940 | DE |
2816173 | Oct 1979 | DE |
3324729 | Jan 1984 | DE |
3237183 | Apr 1984 | DE |
3427716 | Nov 1985 | DE |
3542257 | Jun 1987 | DE |
4030791 | Aug 1991 | DE |
4442420 | May 1996 | DE |
4444482 | Jun 1996 | DE |
69714103 | Sep 1997 | DE |
19635257 | Mar 1998 | DE |
19844132 | Apr 1999 | DE |
19818198 | Oct 1999 | DE |
19908374 | Sep 2000 | DE |
19928764 | Jan 2001 | DE |
69611610 | Jul 2001 | DE |
10024824 | Nov 2001 | DE |
10031923 | Jan 2002 | DE |
69903202 | Jun 2003 | DE |
10211511 | Oct 2003 | DE |
10320350 | Sep 2004 | DE |
103 48 808 | Mar 2005 | DE |
103 48 810 | Mar 2005 | DE |
602 05 728 | Mar 2006 | DE |
0216457 | Apr 1987 | EP |
0299498 | Jan 1989 | EP |
0429022 | May 1991 | EP |
0271657 | May 1992 | EP |
0635853 | Jan 1995 | EP |
0637038 | Feb 1995 | EP |
0435680 | Apr 1995 | EP |
0715320 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0794541 | Sep 1997 | EP |
0804796 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0824755 | Feb 1998 | EP |
1124999 | Aug 2001 | EP |
1 371 434 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1475450 | Nov 2004 | EP |
1503486 | Feb 2005 | EP |
833446 | Apr 1960 | GB |
1369844 | Oct 1974 | GB |
51092097 | Feb 1975 | JP |
54006808 | Jun 1977 | JP |
59058813 | Apr 1984 | JP |
59177902 | Oct 1984 | JP |
61058450 | Mar 1986 | JP |
61253348 | Nov 1986 | JP |
6293342 | Apr 1987 | JP |
62093342 | Apr 1987 | JP |
63-21807 | Jan 1988 | JP |
1247557 | Mar 1989 | JP |
02301544 | Dec 1990 | JP |
03-019307 | Jan 1991 | JP |
03-146615 | Jun 1991 | JP |
4-048005 | Feb 1992 | JP |
05283238 | Oct 1993 | JP |
05-299232 | Nov 1993 | JP |
6033199 | Feb 1994 | JP |
06-224023 | Aug 1994 | JP |
08-246109 | Sep 1996 | JP |
10-092623 | Apr 1998 | JP |
10-097913 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2000-182845 | Jun 2000 | JP |
2000-277357 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2001-068324 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002294408 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2004-349585 | Dec 2004 | JP |
2006193779 | Jul 2006 | JP |
2006322057 | Nov 2006 | JP |
2007113148 | May 2007 | JP |
338550 | May 1972 | SU |
1062298 | Jul 1982 | SU |
WO 9619001 | Jun 1996 | WO |
WO 0025326 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0100895 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO 0186665 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 02055749 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO 03003385 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 2007088513 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090184790 A1 | Jul 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60935146 | Jul 2007 | US |