Soft magnetic metal powder, dust core, and magnetic component

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11705259
  • Patent Number
    11,705,259
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, September 29, 2020
    3 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 18, 2023
    a year ago
Abstract
According to an aspect, a soft magnetic metal powder includes a plurality of soft magnetic metal particles containing iron, a surface of each of the soft magnetic metal particles is covered with a coating part, and a maximum height Sz of a surface of the coating part is 10 to 700 nm. According to another aspect, a soft magnetic metal powder includes a plurality of soft magnetic metal particles containing iron, a surface of each of the soft magnetic metal particles is covered with a coating part, and a maximum height Rz of a surface of the coating part is 10 to 700 nm.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to a soft magnetic metal powder, a dust core, and a magnetic component.


2. Description of the Related Art

As a magnetic component that is used in a power supply circuit of various electronic devices, a transformer, a choke coil, an inductor, and the like are known.


Such a magnetic component has a configuration in which a coil (winding) that is an electric conductor is disposed at the periphery or the inside of a magnetic core (core) exhibiting predetermined magnetic characteristics.


Examples of a magnetic material that is used in the magnetic core provided in the magnetic component such as the inductor include a soft magnetic metal material containing iron (Fe). For example, the magnetic core can be obtained as a dust core by compression-molding a soft magnetic metal powder including particles constituted by the soft magnetic metal containing Fe.


In the dust core, a ratio (filling ratio) of a magnetic component is increased to improve magnetic characteristics. To increase the ratio (filling ratio) of the magnetic component, a method of decreasing the amount of an insulating resin contained is employed. However, in the method, a contact ratio between soft magnetic metal particles increases, and a loss caused by a current (inter-particle eddy current) flowing between particles which are in contact with each other increases at the time of AC voltage application to the magnetic component. As a result, there is a problem that a core loss of the dust core becomes large.


Here, in order to suppress the eddy current, an insulating coating film is formed on a surface of the soft magnetic metal particles. For example, JP 2015-132010 A discloses a method for forming an insulating coating layer, in which a powder glass containing oxides of phosphorus (P) softened by mechanical friction is adhered to the surface of an Fe-based amorphous alloy powder.


In JP 2015-132010 A, the Fe-based amorphous alloy powder on which the insulating coating layer is formed is mixed with a resin to form a dust core by compression molding. In the dust core, when mechanical strength of the core is low, a crack is likely to occur, and problems such as a decrease in permeability, and a decrease in inductance occur. Accordingly, in addition to satisfactory magnetic characteristics and a high insulating property (withstand voltage property), high mechanical strength is required for the dust core. However, when the insulating coating layer is simply formed by the method disclosed in JP 2015-132010 A, the withstand voltage property and the strength cannot be compatible with each other.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention has been made in consideration such circumstances, and an object thereof is to provide a dust core having satisfactory withstand voltage properties and strength, a magnetic component including the dust core, and a soft magnetic metal powder suitable for the dust core.


The present inventors found that when a coating part having a predetermined surface texture is provided on soft magnetic metal particles of a soft magnetic metal having a specific composition, both the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core are improved. Based on the founding, the present invention has been accomplished.


That is, aspects of the invention are as follows.


[1] A soft magnetic metal powder including soft magnetic metal particles containing iron, in which a surface of each of the soft magnetic metal particles is covered with a coating part, and a maximum height Sz of a surface of the coating part is 10 to 700 nm.


[2] The soft magnetic metal powder according to [1], in which an arithmetical mean height Sa of the surface of the coating part may be 3 to 50 nm.


[3] The soft magnetic metal powder according to [1] or [2], in which Sz/T may be 1.5 to 30 when a thickness of the coating part is set as T [nm].


[4] A soft magnetic metal powder including soft magnetic metal particles containing iron, in which a surface of each of the soft magnetic metal particles is covered with a coating part, and a maximum height Rz of a surface of the coating part is 10 to 700 nm.


[5] The soft magnetic metal powder according to [4], in which, an arithmetical mean height Ra of the surface of the coating part may be 3 to 100 nm.


[6] The soft magnetic metal powder according to [4] or [5], in which Rz/T may be 1.5 to 30 when a thickness of the coating part is set as T [nm].


[7] The soft magnetic metal powder according to any one of [1] to [6], in which T may be 3 to 200 nm when a thickness of the coating part is set as T [nm].


[8] The soft magnetic metal powder according to any one of [1] to [7], in which, the coating part may contain at least one selected from the group consisting of phosphorus, aluminum, calcium, barium, bismuth, silicon, chromium, sodium, zinc, and oxygen.


[9] The soft magnetic metal powder according to any one of [1] to [8], in which, the soft magnetic metal particles may be constituted by an amorphous alloy.


[10] The soft magnetic metal powder according to any one of [1] to [8], in which, the soft magnetic metal particles may be constituted by a nanocrystalline alloy.


[11] A dust core containing the soft magnetic metal powder according to any one of [1] to [10].


[12] A magnetic component including the dust core according to [11].


According to the present invention, a dust core having satisfactory withstand voltage properties and strength, a magnetic component including the dust core, and a soft magnetic metal powder suitable for the dust core are provided.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional schematic view of coated particles which constitute a soft magnetic metal powder according to an embodiment;



FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional schematic view illustrating a configuration of a powder coating device that is used to form the coating part; and



FIG. 3 is a composition image of the coated particles in Examples.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Since compatibility between the strength and the withstand voltage of the dust core was difficult in the related art, the present inventors have made a thorough investigation on a correlation between a nano-level fine structure of soft magnetic particle surface on which a coating part is formed, and the strength and the withstand voltage of the dust core from a new viewpoint.


The present inventors have made a thorough investigation on a correlation between nano-level surface roughness of the soft magnetic particle surface on which the coating part is formed and the strength of the dust core among many complex strength factors having an influence on the dust core.


As a result, they found that when surface roughness of the soft magnetic particles on which the coating part is formed is equal to or greater than a lower limit value of a range described in the appended claims, it is effective to improve the strength of the dust core.


In addition, with regard to the withstand voltage of the dust core, the present inventors have made a thorough investigation on a correlation between the nano-level surface roughness of the soft magnetic particle surface on which the coating part is formed and the withstand voltage among many complex withstand voltage factors having an influence on the dust core.


As a result, they found that when the surface roughness of the soft magnetic particles on which the coating part is formed is equal to or lower than an upper limit value of a range described in the appended claims, it is effective for an improvement of that withstand voltage of the dust core. They also found that the surface roughness of the soft magnetic particles on which the coating part is formed is within a range described in the appended claims, compatibility of the strength of the dust core and the withstand voltage, which is difficult in the related art, can be realized at a high level.


Hereinafter, the invention will be described in detail in the following order on the basis of specific embodiments illustrated in the drawings.


1. Soft Magnetic Metal Powder

    • 1.1. Soft Magnetic Metal
      • 1.1.1. Fe-Based Amorphous Alloy
      • 1.1.2. Fe-Based Nanocrystalline Alloy
    • 1.2. Coating Part
      • 1.2.1. Composition
      • 1.2.2. Surface Texture


2. Dust Core


3. Magnetic Component


4. Method for Manufacturing Dust Core

    • 4.1. Method for Manufacturing Soft Magnetic Metal Powder
    • 4.2. Method for Manufacturing Dust Core


(1. Soft Magnetic Metal Powder)


As illustrated in FIG. 1, a soft magnetic metal powder according an embodiment includes a plurality of coated particles 1 in which a coating part 10 is formed on a surface of a soft magnetic metal particle 2. When a number ratio of particles included in the soft magnetic metal powder is set as 100%, a number ratio of the coated particles is preferably 90% or greater, and more preferably 95% or greater.


In this embodiment, a shape of the soft magnetic metal particle 2 is preferably spherical. Specifically, the average circularity of a cross-section of the soft magnetic metal particle 2 included in the soft magnetic metal powder is preferably 0.85 or greater. As the circularity, for example, Wadell's circularity can be used.


In addition, an average particle size (D50) of the soft magnetic metal powder according to this embodiment may be selected depending on an application and a material. In this embodiment, the average particle size (D50) is preferably within a range of 0.3 to 100 μm. When the average particle size of the soft magnetic metal powder is set within the above-described range, it is easy to maintain sufficient moldability or predetermined magnetic characteristics. A method for measuring the average particle size is not particularly limited, but it is preferable to use a laser diffraction scattering method.


In this embodiment, the soft magnetic metal powder may include only soft magnetic metal particles of the same material, or soft magnetic metal particles of different materials. Here, examples of the different materials include a case where elements constituting the soft magnetic metal are different from each other, a case where compositions are different in the same constituent elements.


(1.1. Soft Magnetic Metal)


The soft magnetic metal particle is constituted by a soft magnetic metal containing iron (Fe). Examples of the soft magnetic metal containing iron include a pure iron, a Fe-based alloy, a Fe—Si-based alloy, a Fe—Al-based alloy, a Fe—Ni-based alloy, a Fe—Si—Al-based alloy, a Fe—Si—Cr-based alloy, and a Fe—Ni—Si—Co-based alloy; Fe-based amorphous alloys; Fe-based nanocrystalline alloys; and the like.


The Fe-based amorphous alloy may be constituted by only an amorphous phase, or may have a structure in which initial fine crystals are dispersed in the amorphous phase, that is, a nano-heterostructure.


The Fe-based nanocrytsalline alloy has a structure in which nanometer-scale Fe-based nanocrystals are dispersed in an amorphous phase.


In this embodiment, as the soft magnetic metal containing iron, a Fe-based amorphous alloy, or a Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy is preferable. Hereinafter, description will be given of the Fe-based amorphous alloy and the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy.


(1.1.1. Fe-Based Amorphous Alloy)


In this embodiment, it is preferable that the Fe-based amorphous alloy has a nano-heterostructure in which initial fine crystals exist in the amorphous phase. This structure is a structure obtained by rapidly cooling a molten metal of a raw material of the soft magnetic metal, and is a structure in which a number of fine crystals precipitate into an amorphous alloy and disperse. Accordingly, an average crystal grain size of the initial fine crystals is very small. In this embodiment, the average crystal grain size of the initial fine crystals is preferably 0.3 to 10 nm.


When the soft magnetic metal having the nano-heterostructure is subjected to a heat treatment under predetermined conditions, initial fine crystals grow, and thus it is easy to obtain a Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy to be described later.


Next, a composition of the Fe-based amorphous alloy will be described in detail.


In this embodiment, the composition of the Fe-based amorphous alloy is preferably expressed by a composition formula (Fe(1−(α+β))X1αX2β)(1−(a+b+c+d+e+f))MaBbPcSidCeSf.


In the composition formula, M represents at least one of element selected from the group consisting of niobium (Nb), hafnium (Hf), zirconium (Zr), tantalum (Ta), molybdenum (Mo), tungsten (W), titanium (Ti), and vanadium (V).


In addition, “a” represents a molar ratio of M, and it is preferable that “a” satisfies a relationship of 0≤a≤0.300 from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core. That is, the soft magnetic metal may not contain M.


Furthermore, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of soft magnetic characteristics, it is preferable that “a” satisfies a relationship of 0≤a≤0.150. The molar ratio (a) of M is more preferably 0.040 or greater, and still more preferably 0.050 or greater. In addition, the molar ratio (a) of M is more preferably 0.100 or less, and still more preferably 0.080 or less. In a case where “a” is excessively large, there is a tendency that saturation magnetization of the powder is likely to decrease.


In the composition formula, “b” represents a molar ratio of boron (B), and from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, it is preferable that “b” satisfies a relationship of 0≤b≤0.400. That is, the soft magnetic metal may not contain B.


Furthermore, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of the soft magnetic characteristics, it is preferable that “b” satisfies a relationship of 0≤b≤0.200. The molar ratio (b) of B is more preferably 0.025 or greater, still more preferably 0.060 or greater, and still more preferably 0.080 or greater. In addition, the molar ratio (b) of B is more preferably 0.150 or less, and still more preferably 0.120 or less. In a case where “b” is excessively large, there is a tendency that saturation magnetization of the powder is likely to decrease.


In the composition formula, “c” represents a molar ratio of phosphorous (P), and from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, it is preferable that “c” satisfies a relationship of 0≤c≤0.400. That is, the soft magnetic metal may not contain P.


In addition, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of the soft magnetic characteristics, it is preferable that “c” satisfies a relationship of 0≤c≤0.200. The molar ratio (c) of P is more preferably 0.005 or greater, and still more preferably 0.010 or greater. In addition, the molar ratio (c) of P is more preferably 0.100 or less. In a case where “c” is within the above-described range, resistivity of the soft magnetic metal is improved, and a coercive force thereof tends to decrease. In a case where “c” is excessively large, there is a tendency that saturation magnetization of the powder is likely to decrease.


In the composition formula, “d” represents a molar ratio of silicon (Si), and from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, it is preferable that “d” satisfies a relationship of 0≤d≤0.400. That is, the soft magnetic metal may not contain Si.


Furthermore, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of the soft magnetic characteristics, it is preferable that “d” satisfies a relationship of 0≤d≤0.200. The molar ratio (d) of Si is more preferably 0.001 or greater, and still more preferably 0.005 or greater. In addition, the molar ratio (d) of Si is more preferably 0.040 or less. In a case where “d” is within the above-described range, there is a tendency that the coercive force of the soft magnetic metal is likely to decrease. On the other hand, in a case where “d” is excessively large, the coercive force of the soft magnetic metal tends to increase on the contrary.


In the composition formula, “e” represents a molar ratio of carbon (C), and from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, it is preferable that “e” satisfies a relationship of 0≤e≤0.400. That is, the soft magnetic metal may not contain C.


Furthermore, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of the soft magnetic characteristics, it is preferable that “e” satisfies a relationship of 0≤e≤0.200. The molar ratio (e) of C is more preferably 0.001 or greater. In addition, the molar ratio (e) of C is more preferably 0.035 or less, and still more preferably 0.030 or less. In a case where “e” is within the above-described range, there is a tendency that the coercive force of the soft magnetic metal is particularly likely to decrease. In a case where “e” is excessively large, the coercive force of the soft magnetic metal tends to increase on the contrary.


In the composition formula, “f” represents a molar ratio of sulfur (S), and from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, it is preferable that “f” satisfies a relationship of 0≤f≤0.040. That is, the soft magnetic metal may not contain S.


Furthermore, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of the soft magnetic characteristics, it is preferable that “f” satisfies a relationship of 0≤f≤0.020. The molar ratio (f) of S is more preferably 0.002 or greater. In addition, the molar ratio (f) of S is more preferably 0.010 or less. In a case where “f” is within the above-described range, there is a tendency that the coercive force of the soft magnetic metal is likely to decrease. In a case where “f” is excessively large, the coercive force of the soft magnetic metal tends to increase.


In addition, “f” satisfies a relationship of f≥0.001, the circularity of the soft metal particle is likely to be improved. When the circularity of the soft magnetic metal particle is improved, the density of the dust core obtained by compression-molding a powder including the soft magnetic metal particles can be improved.


In the composition formula, “1−(a+b+c+d+e+f)” represents a molar ratio of iron (Fe). The molar ratio of Fe is not particularly limited, but in this embodiment, from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, the molar ratio (1−(a+b+c+d+e+f)) of Fe is preferably 0.410 to 0.910.


Furthermore, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of the soft magnetic characteristics, the molar ratio (1−(a+b+c+d+e+f)) of Fe is preferably 0.700 to 0.850. When the molar ratio of Fe is set within the above-described range, a crystal phase constituted by crystals having a crystal grain size of greater than 100 nm is less likely to further occur.


In addition, as illustrated in the composition formula, a part of iron may be substituted with X1 and/or X2 in terms of a composition.


X1 represents at least one element selected from the group consisting of cobalt (Co) and nickel (Ni). In the composition formula, “α” represents a molar ratio of X1, and in this embodiment, “α” is preferably 0 or greater. That is, the soft magnetic metal may not contain X1.


In addition, when the number of atoms of the entire composition is set as 100 at %, from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, the number of atoms of X1 is preferably 70.00 at % or less. It is preferable to satisfy a relationship of 0≤α{1−(a+b+c+d+e+f)}≤0.7000.


Furthermore, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of the soft magnetic characteristics, the number of atoms of X1 is preferably 40.00 at % or less. That is, it is preferable to satisfy a relationship of 0≤α{1−(a+b+c+d+e+f)}≤0.4000.


X2 is at least one element selected from the group consisting of aluminum (Al), manganese (Mn), silver (Ag), zinc (Zn), tin (Sn), arsenic (As), antimony (Sb), copper (Cu), chromium (Cr), bismuth (Bi), nitrogen (N), oxygen (O), and rare earth elements. In the composition formula, “β” represents a molar ratio of X2, and in this embodiment, “β” is preferably 0 or greater. That is, the soft magnetic metal may not contain X2.


In addition, when the number of atoms of the entire composition is set as 100 at %, from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, the number of atoms of X2 is preferably 6.00 at % or less. That is, it is preferable to satisfy a relationship of 0≤β{1−(a+b+c+d+e+f)}≤0.0600.


Furthermore, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of the soft magnetic characteristics, the number of atoms of X2 is preferably 3.00 at % or less. That is, It is preferable to satisfy a relationship of 0≤β{1−(a+b+c+d+e+f)}0.0300.


Moreover, from the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, a range (substitution ratio) in which X1 and/or X2 are substituted with iron is set to 0.94 or less of a total number of atoms of Fe in terms of the number of atoms. That is, 0≤α+β≤0.94.


Furthermore, in addition to the viewpoint of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core, from the viewpoint of the soft magnetic characteristics, a substitution range of X1 and/or X2 with iron is set to be equal to or less than the half of the total number of atoms of Fe in terms of the number of atoms. That is, a relation of 0≤α+β≤0.50 is satisfied. In the case of α+β>0.50, there is a tendency that it is difficult to obtain the soft magnetic metal in which Fe-based nanocrystals precipitate by a heat treatment.


Note that, the Fe-based amorphous alloy may contain elements other than the above-described elements as inevitable impurities. For example, the elements other than the above-described elements may be contained in a total amount of 0.1% by mass with respect to 100% by mass of Fe-based amorphous alloy.


(1.1.2. Fe-Based Nanocrystalline Alloy)


The Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy includes a Fe-based nanocrystal. The Fe-based nanocrystal is a Fe crystal having a crystal grain size of a nanometer-scale and a crystal structure a body-centered cubic structure (bcc) as a crystal structure. In the soft magnetic metal, a number of the Fe-based nanocrystals precipitate and are dispersed in an amorphous phase. In this embodiment, the Fe-based nanocrystals are more suitably obtained by subjecting a Fe-based amorphous alloy having a nano-heterostructure to a heat treatment to grow initial fine crystals.


Accordingly, an average crystal grain size of the Fe-based nanocrystal tends to be slightly greater than an average crystal grain size of initial fine crystals. In this embodiment, the average crystal grain size of the Fe-based nanocrystal is preferably 5 to 30 nm. In regard with the soft magnetic metal in which Fe-based nanocrystals are dispersed in an amorphous phase, high saturation magnetization is likely to be obtained, and a low coercive force is likely to be obtained.


In this embodiment, a composition of the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy is preferably the same as the composition of the above-described Fe-based amorphous alloy. Accordingly, the above-described explanation relating to the composition of the Fe-based amorphous alloy is applied to an explanation of the composition of the Fe-based nanocrystalline alloy.


(1.2. Coating Part)


As illustrated in FIG. 1, the coating part 10 is formed to cover the surface of the soft magnetic metal particle 2. In addition, in this embodiment, description of “a surface is coated with a material” represents an aspect in which the material is in contact with the surface and is fixed to cover the contact portion. Moreover, the coating part that coats the soft magnetic metal particle may cover at least a part of a surface of the particle, but preferably covers approximately 90% of the surface, and more preferably the entirety of the surface. Furthermore, the coating part may continuously or intermittently cover the surface of particles.


A coating ratio can be measured as follows with respect to the soft magnetic metal particle on which the coating part is formed. A coated particle is observed with a known scanning electron microscope to obtain a composition image. Acquisition of the composition image is preferably performed at 10 locations or greater in a region of approximately 100 μm×100 μm. The obtained composition image is binarized by using commercially available image analysis software so that the coating part is shown in a black color and a region in which an uncoated soft magnetic metal is exposed is shown in a white color, and then a ratio of an area of the coating part with respect to a total area of the coated particle is set as the coating ratio.


Specifically, FIG. 3 is a composition image of the coated particle. In the composition image, portions difference in a composition (the soft magnetic metal and the coating part) are observed as portions different in contrast, and thus the coated particle on the composition image can be classified into a region corresponding to the coating part and a region corresponding to the soft magnetic metal through binarization. As illustrated in FIG. 3, in the composition image, it can be understood that a number of the soft magnetic metal particles include a relatively black portion (the coating part) and a relatively white portion (the soft magnetic metal). Accordingly, when the image of FIG. 3 is binarized, it is possible to calculate a ratio of an area of the relatively black portion with respect to a total area of the relatively black region (coating part) and the relatively white portion (soft magnetic metal), that is, the coating ratio.


(1.2.1. Composition)


There is no particular limitation as long as the coating part 10 is constituted by a material capable of insulating soft magnetic metal particles constituting the soft magnetic metal powder. That is, the coating part 10 has an insulation property. In this embodiment, it is preferable that the coating part 10 contains at least one element selected from the group consisting of phosphorus (P), aluminum (Al), calcium (Ca), barium (Ba), bismuth (Bi), silicon (Si), chromium (Cr), sodium (Na), zinc (Zn), and oxygen (O). More preferably, the coating part 10 contains a compound containing at least one element selected from the group consisting of phosphorus, zinc, and sodium. More preferably, the compound is an oxide, and still more preferably oxide glass.


In a case where the compound is an oxide, it is preferable that an oxide of at least one element selected from the group consisting of phosphorus, aluminum, calcium, barium, bismuth, silicon, chromium, sodium, and zinc is contained as a main component in the coating part 10. Description of “an oxide of at least one element selected from the group consisting of P, Al, Ca, Ba, Bi, Si, Cr, Na, and Zn is contained as a main component” means that a total amount of at least one kind of element selected from the group consisting of P, Al, Ca, Ba, Bi, Si, Cr, Na, and Zn is the largest when a total amount of elements excluding oxygen among elements contained in the coating part 10 is set as 100% by mass. In addition, in this embodiment, the total amount of these elements is preferably 50% by mass or greater, and more preferably 60% by mass or greater.


The oxide glass is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include phosphate (P2O5)-based glass, bismuthate (Bi2O3)-based glass, and borosilicate (B2O3—SiO2)-based glass.


As the P2O5-based glass, glass containing 50% by mass or greater of P2O5 is preferable, and examples thereof include P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3-based glass, and the like. Note that, “R” represents an alkali metal.


As the Bi2O3-based glass, glass containing 50% by mass or greater of Bi2O3 is preferable, and examples thereof include Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2-based glass, and the like.


As the B2O3—SiO2-based glass, glass containing 10% by mass or greater of B2O3 and 10% by mass or greater of SiO2 is preferable, and examples thereof include BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3-based glass, and the like.


Since the coating part having an insulation property is included, an insulating property of particles becomes higher. Accordingly, a withstand voltage of the dust core constituted by the soft magnetic metal powder including the coated particles is improved.


Components contained in the coating part can be identified from information such as element analysis by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) using a transmission electron microscope (TEM) such as a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM), element analysis by electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), a lattice constant obtained by fast Fourier transform (FFT) analysis of a TEM image, and the like.


(1.2.2. Surface Texture)


In this embodiment, a surface texture of the coating part is controlled to a predetermined shape. Specifically, the maximum height Sz of a surface of the coating part is 10 to 700 nm. Sz is one of surface roughness parameters defined in ISO25178, and is the sum of the maximum value of a peak height and a maximum value of a valley depth on a measurement surface (surface of the coating part).


In a case where Sz is within the above-described range, the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core can be compatible with each other. When Sz is excessively small, the surface of the coating part is excessively smooth, and thus the strength of the dust core tends to decrease. On the other hand, when Sz is excessively large, a very large uneven portion exists on the surface of the coating part, and thus in the dust core, the unevenness of a coating part of one particle is likely to damage a coating part of another particle, or a lot of extremely thin coating portions and a lot of uncoated portions exist. Accordingly, the withstand voltage property of the dust core tends to deteriorate.


Sz is preferably 20 nm or greater, more preferably 30 nm or greater, and still more preferably 40 nm or greater. On the other hand, Sz is preferably 600 nm or less, more preferably 500 nm or less, and still more preferably 400 nm or less.


Moreover, in this embodiment, an arithmetical mean height Sa of the surface of the coating part is preferably 3 to 50 nm. Sa is one of surface roughness parameters defined in ISO25178, and is a mean value of absolute values of the peak height and the valley depth on the measurement surface (surface of the coating part). Sa is calculated while an influence of local unevenness such as Sz is suppressed and thus Sa is expressed as average surface roughness on the entire measurement surface.


In addition to Sz, in a case where Sa is within the above-described range, both the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core become satisfactory, and the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core are compatible with each other at a high level. In a case where Sa is out of the above-described range, there is a tendency that only one of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core becomes satisfactory.


Furthermore, in this embodiment, it is preferable that Sz and the thickness of the coating part satisfy a predetermined relationship. Specifically, when the thickness of the coating part is set as T [nm], Sz/T is preferably 1.5 to 30. When controlling Sz in correspondence with the thickness of the coating part, the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core are compatible with each other at a higher level.


Sz/T is more preferably 1.8 or greater, and still more preferably 2.0 or greater. On the other hand, Sz/T is more preferably 26 or less, and still more preferably 22 or less.


In this embodiment, even in a viewpoint different from the surface roughness, the surface texture of the coating part is controlled to a predetermined shape. Specifically, the maximum height Rz of a contour curve of the surface of the coating part is 10 to 700 nm. Rz is one of line roughness parameters specified in JIS B601, and is the sum of a maximum value of a peak height and a maximum value of a valley depth on the contour curve having a predetermined length on the measurement surface (surface of the coating part).


In a case where Rz is within the above-described range, as in Sz, the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core are compatible with each other. When Rz is excessively small, the surface of the coating part is excessively smooth, and thus the strength of the dust core tends to decrease. On the other hand, when Rz is excessively large, a very large uneven portion exists on the surface of the coating part, and thus in the dust core, the unevenness of a coating part of one particle is likely to damage a coating part of another particle, or a lot of extremely thin coating portions and a lot of uncoated portions exist. Accordingly, the withstand voltage property of the dust core tends to deteriorate.


Rz is preferably 20 nm or greater, more preferably 30 nm or greater, and still more preferably 40 nm or greater. On the other hand, Rz is preferably 600 nm or less, more preferably 500 nm or less, and still more preferably 400 nm or less.


Furthermore, in this embodiment, an arithmetical mean height Ra of the contour curve of the surface of the coating part is preferably 3 to 100 nm. Ra is one of line roughness parameters defined in JIS B601, and is a mean value of absolute values of the peak height and the valley depth of a predetermined length of contour curve of the measurement surface (surface of the coating part). Ra is calculated while an influence of local unevenness such as Rz is suppressed and thus Ra is expressed as average line roughness on the entire contour curve.


In addition to Rz, in a case where Ra is within the above-described range, both the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core become satisfactory, and the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core are compatible with each other at a high level. In a case where Ra is out of the above-described range, there is a tendency that one of the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core becomes satisfactory.


Furthermore, in this embodiment, it is preferable that Rz and the thickness of the coating part satisfy a predetermined relationship. Specifically, when the thickness of the coating part is set as T [nm], Rz/T is preferably 1.5 to 30. When controlling Rz in correspondence with the thickness of the coating part, the withstand voltage property and the strength of the dust core are compatible with each other at a higher level.


Rz/T is more preferably 1.8 or greater, and still more preferably 2.0 or greater. On the other hand, Rz/T is more preferably 26 or less, and still more preferably 22 or less.


The thickness T of the coating part 10 is not particularly limited as long as the above-described relationship is satisfied. In this embodiment, T is preferably 3 to 200 nm. In addition, T is more preferably 5 nm or greater, and still more preferably 10 nm or greater. On the other hand, T is more preferably 70 nm or less, and still more preferably 50 nm or less.


The surface texture of the coating part can be measured as follows. In a case where the surface of the coating part is expressed as an XY plane by using an X-axis and a Y-axis which are orthogonal to each other, the surface texture of the coating part can be expressed as a displacement in a Z-axis direction orthogonal to the XY plane. That is, surface roughness of the coating part is expressed as a three-dimensional (X, Y, Z) shape.


Accordingly, the maximum height Sz and the arithmetical mean height Sa which are surface roughness parameters are calculated from measurement results of the displacement in the Z-axis direction in the measurement region. In this embodiment, in the case of measuring the surface roughness of the coating part formed on the soft magnetic metal particle in the soft magnetic metal powder, it is preferable to use an atomic force microscope (AFM) that is a kind of scanning probe microscope.


The AFM detects an interatomic force acting on between a sample surface and a probe provided at a tip end of a cantilever as a displacement of the cantilever, and measures unevenness of a surface of the sample. Since the AFM has high measurement resolution, the AFM is suitable for measuring nanometer-scale Sz and Sa.


A factor caused by the shape of the surface of the coating part, a factor caused by the surface roughness of the surface of the coating part, and a factor caused by waviness of the surface of the coating part are mainly included in the measurement result of the surface texture of the coating part which is obtained as three-dimensional shape data. Accordingly, the measurement result of the surface texture of the coating part is a contour curved surface obtained by combining the factors. The factors are distinguished by a length of a period (wavelength), the factor caused by the surface roughness has a short period (short wavelength), the factor caused by the shape has a long period (long wavelength), and the factor caused by the waviness has an intermediate period.


Particularly, the soft magnetic metal particle on which the coating part is formed is typically spherical, and thus the obtained measurement result becomes curved depending on a particle diameter of the soft magnetic metal particle in comparison to a measurement result obtained by measuring a flat surface.


Here, an operation of obtaining a surface roughness curved surface constituted by the factor caused by the surface roughness is performed by removing the factor caused by the shape and the factor caused by the waviness from the obtained measurement result. On the basis of the obtained surface roughness curved surface, Sz and Sa are calculated in conformity to a method defined in ISO25178. That is, measurement can be performed in a similar method as in the method defined in ISO25178, but measurement may be performed under conditions different from the conditions described in ISO25178.


The operation of obtaining the surface roughness curved surface from the measurement result can be performed by filter processing, flattening processing, or the like that is known. For example, analysis software attached to the AFM, or commercially available software can be used.


In order to obtain the surface roughness curved surface with high accuracy by appropriately removing the factor caused by the shape and the factor caused by the waviness, it is preferable to measure a surface of a coating part formed on a particle having a regular shape rather than measurement of a surface of a coating part formed on a part having an irregular or distorted shape. Accordingly, in this embodiment, in order to obtain Sz and Sa with high accuracy, it is preferable to perform measurement of the surface texture on a coated particle with high circularity.


With regard to a size of a region in which the surface texture of the coating part is measured, in this embodiment, it is preferable that the region has a rectangular shape in which one side has dimensions of 0.1 to 50 μm×0.1 to 50 μm. It is preferable that the measurement of the surface texture of the coating part is performed at approximately 1 to 10 locations with respect to one coating particle. In addition, it is preferable that the measurement of the surface texture of the coating part is performed on 10 to 1000 coated particles. Average values of Sz and Sa calculated from respective measurement results are set as the maximum height Sz and the arithmetical mean height Sa of the surface of the coating part.


The maximum height Rz and the arithmetical mean height Ra are line roughness. The line roughness is expressed as two-dimensional shape data (contour curve) of a surface in a predetermined reference length section. Accordingly, Rz and Ra can be calculated from the contour curve of the surface of the coating part.


In the three-dimensional shape data of the surface texture of the coating part, a cross-section profile parallel to the Z-axis shows the contour curve of the surface of the coating part. Accordingly, in this embodiment, a line roughness parameter of the coating part formed on the soft magnetic metal particle in the soft magnetic metal powder may be calculated by using the contour curve of the surface of the coating part which is extracted from the three-dimensional shape data of the surface texture of the coating part. Alternatively, the contour curve of the surface of the coating part may be obtained by using a known measurement device.


Moreover, soft magnetic metal particles in the dust core are bound and fixed through a resin. On the other hand, it is necessary to measure the surface roughness parameter in a state in which the measurement surface (surface of the coating part) is exposed. Accordingly, in a case where it is difficult to expose the surface of the coating part, for example, with respect to the coating part formed on the soft magnetic metal particle in the dust core, it is very difficult to measure the surface roughness of the surface of the coating part.


Accordingly, for example, in a cross-section of a coated particle appearing on a cross-section of the dust core, the line roughness parameter may be calculated by obtaining the contour curve of the surface of the coating part. Specifically, the cross-section of the coated particle is observed with a known electron microscope (a scanning electron microscope (SEM), a transmission electron microscope (TEM), or the like), and the coating part is specified, for example, on the basis of a contrast difference and a composition analysis result on an observation image. An outermost surface portion of the specified coating part may be set as the contour curve of the surface of the coating part.


As in the contour curved surface, an operation of obtaining the surface roughness curve constituted by the factor caused by the surface roughness is performed by removing the factor caused by the shape and the factor caused by waviness from the obtained contour curve. Rz and Ra are calculated on the basis of the obtained surface roughness curve in conformity to a method defined in JIS B601. That is, measurement can be performed in a similar method as in the method defined in JIS B601, but measurement may be performed under conditions different from the conditions described in JIS B601.


The operation of obtaining the surface roughness curve from the contour curve can be performed by known filter processing, flattening processing, or the like as in the operation of obtaining the surface roughness curved surface. For example, analysis software attached to the AFM, or commercially available software can be used.


Moreover, as with Sz and Sa, in this embodiment, even in a case where the coated particle is included in the soft magnetic metal powder or is fixed in the dust core, in order to obtain Rz and Ra with high accuracy in any case, it is preferable to perform the measurement of the surface texture on a coated particle with high circularity.


In this embodiment, a reference length of the contour curve is preferably 0.1 to 50 μm. It is preferable that the measurement of the contour curve of the coating part is performed at approximately 10 to 100 locations with respect to one coating particle. In addition, it is preferable that the measurement of the contour curve of the coating part is performed on 10 to 100 coated particles. Average values of Rz and Ra calculated from respective measurement results are set as the maximum height Rz and the arithmetical mean height Ra of the surface of the coating part.


The thickness T of the coating part can be measured as follows. The thickness can be measured by observing a cross-section of the coated particle with a known electron microscope (a scanning electron microscope (SEM), a transmission electron microscope (TEM), or the like), and by specifying the coating part, for example, on the basis of a contrast difference and a composition analysis result on an observation image. In this embodiment, it is preferable that the measurement of the thickness T of the coating part is performed at approximately 1 to 10 locations with respect to one coated particle. In addition, it is preferable that the measurement of the thickness T of the coating part is performed on 10 to 100 coated particles. An average value of thicknesses calculated from respective measurement results is set as the thickness T of the coating part.


(2. Dust Core)


The dust core according to this embodiment is not particularly limited as long as the dust core includes the above-described soft magnetic metal powder, and is formed to have a predetermined shape. In this embodiment, the dust core includes the soft magnetic metal powder and a resin as a binding agent, and soft magnetic metal particles constituting the soft magnetic metal powder are bound to each other through the resin and are fixed in a predetermined shape. In addition, the dust core may be constituted by a mixed powder of the above-described soft magnetic metal powder and another magnetic powder, and may be formed in a predetermined shape.


(3. Magnetic Component)


The magnetic component according to this embodiment is not particularly limited as long as the magnetic component includes the above-described dust core. For example, the magnetic component may be a magnetic component in which an air-core coil formed by winding a wire is embedded inside the dust core having a predetermined shape, or may be a magnetic component in which a wire is wound around a surface of the dust core having a predetermined shape with a predetermined number of turns. The magnetic component according to this embodiment has a satisfactory withstand voltage property, and is suitable for a power inductor used in a power supply circuit.


(4. Method for Manufacturing Dust Core) Next, description will be given of a method for manufacturing the dust core including the magnetic component. First, description will be given of a method for manufacturing the soft magnetic metal powder constituting the dust core.


(4.1. Method for Manufacturing Soft Magnetic Metal Powder)


The soft magnetic metal powder according to this embodiment can be obtained by using a method similar to a known method for manufacturing a soft magnetic metal powder. Specifically, the soft magnetic metal powder can be manufactured by using a gas atomizing method, a water atomizing method, a rotating disk method, or the like. In addition, the soft magnetic metal powder may be manufactured by mechanically crushing a ribbon obtained through a single roll method or the like. Among the methods, it is preferable to use the gas atomization method from the viewpoint that the soft magnetic metal powder having desired magnetic characteristics are easily obtained.


In the gas atomization method, first, a molten metal of a raw material of the soft magnetic metal that constitutes the soft magnetic metal powder is obtained. Raw materials (a pure metal and the like) of respective metal elements contained in the soft magnetic metal are prepared, and the raw materials are weighed to be a composition of a finally obtained soft magnetic metal, and the resultant raw materials are melted. Note that, a method of melting the raw materials of the metal elements is not particularly limited, and examples thereof include a method of melting the raw materials with high frequency heating after evacuating in a chamber of an atomizing device. A temperature at the time of the melting may be determined in consideration of melting points of the metal elements, and may be set to, for example, 1200° C. to 1500° C.


The obtained molten metal is supplied into a chamber as a linear continuous fluid through a nozzle provided in the bottom of a crucible, and a high-pressure gas is sprayed to the supplied molten metal to make the molten metal into liquid droplets, and the liquid droplets are rapidly cooled to obtain fine powder. A gas injection temperature, a pressure inside the chamber, and the like may be determined depending on a composition, and a structure (crystalline, an amorphous alloy, or a nanocrystalline alloy) of the soft magnetic metal, or the like. Note that, with regard to a particle size, particle size adjustment can be performed by sieving classification, airflow classification, or the like.


The obtained powder includes soft magnetic metal particles of a crystalline soft magnetic metal, or soft magnetic metal particles of a soft magnetic metal that is an amorphous alloy. In a case where the soft magnetic metal is constituted by the nanocrystalline alloy, it is preferable that the powder including soft magnetic metal particles constituted by an amorphous alloy is subjected to a heat treatment so as to cause a Fe-based nanocrystal to precipitate. In this case, the powder may be a soft magnetic metal having a nano-heterostructure, or may be constituted by an amorphous alloy in which respective metal elements are uniformly dispersed in amorphous.


Note that, in this embodiment, in a case where a crystal having a crystal grain size of greater than 30 nm exists in the soft magnetic metal before the heat treatment, it is determined that the soft magnetic metal is crystalline, and in a case where the crystal having a crystal grain size of greater than 30 nm does not exist, it is determined that the soft magnetic metal is an amorphous alloy. Note that, whether or not the crystal having a crystal grain size of greater than 30 nm exists in the soft magnetic metal may be evaluated by a known method. Examples thereof include X-ray diffraction measurement, observation with a TEM, and the like. In the case of using the TEM, it can be confirmed by obtaining a selected area diffraction image or a nano beam diffraction image. In the case of using the selected area diffraction image or the nano beam diffraction image, ring-shaped diffraction is obtained in the case of amorphous, whereas a diffraction spot caused by a crystal structure is obtained in the opposite case in a diffraction pattern.


Evaluation of presence or absence of the initial fine crystals, and the average crystal grain size is not particularly limited, and may be made by a known method. For example, confirmation can be made by obtaining a bright-field image or a high-resolution image by using a TEM with respect to a sample thinned through ion milling. Specifically, the presence or absence of the initial fine crystals and the average crystal grain size can be visually evaluated by observing the bright-field image or the high-resolution image obtained at a magnification of 1.00×105 to 3.00×105 times.


Next, the obtained powder is subjected to a heat treatment as necessary. By performing the heat treatment, diffusion of elements constituting the soft magnetic metal is promoted and a thermodynamic equilibrium state is reached in a short time while preventing particles from being sintered and being coarsened. Accordingly, a strain or a stress existing in the soft magnetic metal can be removed. As a result, it is easy to obtain a powder constituted by the soft magnetic metal in which the Fe-based nanocrystal precipitates.


In this embodiment, heat treatment conditions are not particularly limited as long as the Fe-based nanocrystal easily precipitates under the conditions. For example, the heat treatment temperature can be set to 400° C. to 700° C., and holding time can be set to 0.5 to 10 hours.


After the heat treatment, a powder including the soft magnetic metal particles constituted by the soft magnetic metal in which the Fe-based nanocrystal precipitate is obtained.


Next, a coating part is formed on the soft magnetic metal particles included in a powder before the heat treatment or a powder after the heat treatment. A method for forming the coating part is not particularly limited, but a known method can be employed. The coating part may be formed by performing a wet treatment on the soft magnetic metal particles, or the coating part may be formed by performing a dry treatment. In addition, the coating part may be formed on the soft magnetic metal powder before performing the heat treatment.


In this embodiment, the coating part can be formed by a coating method using mechanochemical, a phosphate treatment method, a sol-gel method, or the like. In the coating method using mechanochemical, for example, a powder coating device 100 illustrated in FIG. 2 is used. A mixture of the soft magnetic metal powder, and a powder-shaped coating material of a substance (a compound of P, Al, Ca, Ba, Bi, Si, Cr, Na, and Zn, and the like) constituting the coating part is put into a container 101 of the powder coating device. After putting into the mixture the container 101, a grinder 102 is rotated, and thus the mixture 50 of the soft magnetic metal powder and the powder-shaped coating material is compressed between the grinder 102 and an inner wall of the container 101, and friction occurs and heat is generated. Due to the frictional heat generated, the powder-shaped coating material is softened, and is fixed to a surface of the soft magnetic metal particles due to a compressing operation, thereby forming the coating part.


In the coating method using mechanochemical, the frictional heat generated is controlled by adjustment of a rotation speed of the container, a distance between the grinder and the inner wall of the container, and the like and thus a temperature of the mixture of the soft magnetic metal powder and the powder-shaped coating material can be controlled. In this embodiment, the temperature is preferably 50° C. to 150° C. When the temperature is set within the temperature range, the coating part is likely to be formed so as to cover the surface of each of the soft magnetic metal particles. In addition, when adjusting coating time, surface roughness of the coating part, particularly, Sz and Rz tends to be easily controlled. Furthermore, when adjusting a mixing ratio between the soft magnetic metal powder and a powder of the material constituting the coating part, control of the coating thickness T tends to be easy.


Moreover, after forming the coating part, the powder may be subjected to a heat treatment as necessary. Due to the heat treatment, the material constituting the coating part is softened, and thus the surface roughness of the coating part, particularly, Sa and Ra tends to be easily controlled. For example, when a heat treatment temperature is high, or heat treatment time is long, Sa and Ra tend to be small.


(4.2. Method for Manufacturing Dust Core)


The dust core is manufactured by using the above-described soft magnetic metal powder. A specific manufacturing method is not particularly limited, but a known method can be employed. First, the soft magnetic metal powder including the soft magnetic metal particles on which the coating part is formed, and a known resin as a binding agent are mixed, thereby obtaining a mixture. Alternatively, the obtained mixture may be made into a granulated powder as necessary. Then, the mixture or the granulated powder is filled in a mold and is subjected to compression molding, thereby obtaining a green compact having a shape of the dust core to be manufactured. Since the sphericity of the soft magnetic metal particles is high, the soft magnetic metal particles are densely filled in the mold by compressing and molding the powder including the soft magnetic metal particles, and thus a dust core with high density can be obtained.


When the obtained green compact is subjected to a heat treatment, for example, at a temperature of 50° C. to 200° C., the resin is cured, and the dust core having a predetermined shape in which the soft magnetic metal particles are fixed through the resin is obtained. A wire is wound around the obtained dust core with a predetermined number of turns, thereby obtaining a magnetic component such as an inductor.


Alternatively, the mixture or the granulated powder, and an air-core coil in which a wire is wound with a predetermined number of turns may be filled in the mold and may be subjected to compression molding to obtain a green compact in which the coil is embedded. When a heat treatment is performed on the obtained green compact, a dust core having a predetermined shape in which the coil is embedded is obtained. Since the coil is embedded inside, the dust core functions as a magnetic component such as an inductor.


Hereinbefore, the embodiment of the invention has been described, but the invention is not limited to the embodiment any more, and may be modified in various aspects within the scope of the invention.


EXAMPLES

Hereinafter, the invention will be described in more detail with reference to examples, but the invention is not limited to the examples.


Experiment 1

First, raw material metals of the soft magnetic metal were prepared. The prepared raw material metals were weighed to be a predetermined composition, and were put into a crucible disposed inside an atomizing device. Next, the inside of a chamber was evacuated, and the crucible was heated by high frequency induction by using a work coil provided at the outside of the crucible to melt and mix the raw material metals in the crucible, thereby obtaining a molten metal in a temperature of 1250° C. In Examples 1 to 35, and Comparative Examples 1 and 2, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was Fe-7.6Si-2.3B-7.3Nb-1.1Cu. In Example 36, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was Fe-6.5Si-2.6B-2.5Cr. In Example 37, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was Fe-4.5Si. Note that, Fe-4.5Si represents a composition containing 95.5% by mass of Fe, and 4.5% by mass of Si. This is also true of the other compositions.


The obtained molten metal was supplied into the chamber as a linear continuous fluid through a nozzle provided in the bottom of the crucible, and a gas was sprayed to the supplied molten metal, thereby obtaining a powder. A gas injection temperature was set to 1250° C., and a pressure inside the chamber was set to 1 hPa. Note that, an average particle diameter (D50) of the obtained powder was 20 μm. In addition, average circularity of a cross-section of the particles included in the obtained powder was 0.80 to 0.90.


X-ray diffraction measurement was performed on the obtained powder, and presence or absence of a crystal having a crystal grain size greater than 30 nm was confirmed. Then, in a case where a crystal having a crystal grain size greater than 30 nm did not exist, it was determined that the soft magnetic metal constituting the powder was an amorphous alloy, and in a case where the crystal having a crystal grain size greater than 30 nm existed, it was determined that the soft magnetic metal was crystalline. The results are shown in Table 1. In Example 36, an average crystal grain size of initial fine crystals was 2 nm.


Next, the powders of Examples 1 to 35, and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 were subjected to a heat treatment. As heat treatment conditions, a heat treatment temperature was set to 600° C., and holding time was set to one hour. X-ray diffraction measurement and observation with a TEM were performed on the powder after the heat treatment to evaluate whether or not the Fe-based nanocrystal existed. The results are shown in Table 1. Note that, in Examples in which the Fe-based nanocrystal existed, it was confirmed that a crystal structure of the Fe-based nanocrystal was a bcc structure, and an average crystal grain size was 5 to 30 nm.


Next, powders of Examples 1 to 37, and Comparative Examples 1 and 2 together with a powder-shaped coating material of a material shown in Table 1 were put into a container of a powder coating device to coat a surface of the particles with the powder-shaped coating material and to form the coating part, thereby obtaining the soft magnetic metal powder. The amount of the powder-shaped coating material added was set to 0.01% by mass to 3% by mass with respect to 100% by mass of powder after the heat treatment. In addition, coating time was set to 0.1 to 8 hours, and a temperature of a mixture of the powder after the heat treatment and the powder-shaped coating material was 50° C. to 150° C. A number ratio of the coated particles in the powder after forming the coating part was 85% to 95%.


In Examples 1 to 25, 36, 37, and Comparative Examples 1 and 2, as the powder-shaped coating material, phosphate-based glass having a composition of P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3 was used. As a specific composition, P2O5 was 50% by mass, ZnO was 12% by mass, R2O was 20% by mass, Al2O3 was 6% by mass, and the remainder was a sub-component.


Note that, the present inventors have also conducted similar experiments using a glass having a composition in which P2O5 was 60% by mass, ZnO was 20% by mass, R2O was 10% by mass, Al2O3 was 5% by mass, and the remainder was a sub-component, and the like, and it has been confirmed that results similar to results to be described later were obtained.


A surface texture was measured as follows with respect to the soft magnetic metal particles on which the coating part was formed. As a measurement device, a scanning probe microscope (AFM5100N, manufactured by Hitachi High-Tech Science Corporation) was used. As a cantilever, SI-DF40 (a spring constant: 42 N/m and a resonance frequency: 250 to 390 kHz) manufactured by Hitachi High-Tech Science Corporation was used, and a radius of curvature of a tip end of the probe was 10 nm.


A measurement mode of an atomic force microscope was set to a dynamic force mode, one square region of 5 μm×5 μm was selected on a surface of the coating part of the soft magnetic metal particles having circularity of 0.98 or greater, and measurement was performed on the region. 30 particles were measured. After surface texture data obtained was subjected to tertiary inclination correction by using software attached to the atomic force microscope on the basis of ISO25178, Sz and Sa in respective regions were calculated. The results are shown in Table 1.


With respect to the soft magnetic metal particles on which the coating part was formed, the thickness T of the coating part was measured as follows. A cross-section of a particle was observed with a TEM, and the coating part was specified by a contrast difference on an observation image. In the specified coating part, the thickness was measured at 10 locations. Measurement of the thickness was performed on 10 particles, and an average value of the measured thicknesses was set as the thickness T of the coating part. The results are shown in Table 1.


Next, the dust core was manufactured. An epoxy resin that was a thermosetting resin and an imide resin that was a curing agent were weighed so that a total amount thereof becomes 3% by mass with respect to 100% by mass of soft magnetic metal powder obtained, and the resins were added to acetone to form a solution, and the solution and the soft magnetic metal powder were mixed with each other. After the mixing, granules obtained by volatilizing the acetone were sieved with a mesh of 355 μm. The granules were filled in a toroidal mold having an outer diameter of 11 mm and an inner diameter of 6.5 mm, and were compressed at a molding pressure of 3.0 t/cm2, thereby obtaining a green compact of the dust core. The obtained green compact of the dust core was cured at 180° C. for one hour, thereby obtaining the dust core.


The strength of the dust core that was obtained was measured as follows. As a measurement device, a strength tester (MODEL-1311D, manufactured by Aikoh Engineering Co., Ltd.) was used. A load was applied to the dust core in a diameter direction by using the strength tester, and radial crushing strength of the dust core was calculated from the load P [kgf] when the dust core was broken by using the following expression. When an outer diameter of the dust core is set as D, a thickness calculated from a difference between the outer diameter and an inner diameter is set as A, and a length of the dust core is set as L, the radial crushing strength K [MPa] is calculated from K=P(D−A)/LA2. In the present examples, it was determined that a sample having the radial crushing strength of 15 MPa or greater was satisfactory. The results are shown in Table 1.


Moreover, In—Ga electrodes were formed on both ends of the obtained dust core sample, a voltage was applied to the both ends by using a voltage-rising destruction tester (THK-2011ADMPT manufactured by TAMADENSOKU CO, LTD.), and a withstand voltage was calculated from a voltage value when a current of 1 mA flows and a length L of the dust core. In the present examples, it was determined that a sample of which the withstand voltage was 80 V/mm or greater was satisfactory. The results are shown in Table 1.












TABLE 1









Soft
Dust core











Coating part
magnetic
Withstand
















Sz
Sa

Thickness T

metal
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(MPa)
(V/mm)



















Example 1
10
1.3
0.4
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
23
287


Example 2
21
2.1
0.8
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
31
286


Example 3
32
2.9
1.4
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
37
282


Example 4
44
4.3
1.7
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
43
276


Example 5
121
8.2
5.0
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
51
272


Example 6
396
34
17
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
55
233


Example 7
497
37
19
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
57
197


Example 8
595
54
25
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
59
167


Example 9
698
62
33
21
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
61
117


Example 10
25
3.1
1.1
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
35
283


Example 11
563
49.8
27
21
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
59
166


Example 12
33
3.2
1.5
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
39
281


Example 13
41
3.7
1.8
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
42
278


Example 14
48
4.1
2.0
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
46
275


Example 15
550
45
22
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
55
176


Example 16
598
47
26
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
56
169


Example 17
638
48
29
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
57
153


Example 18
123
9.5
123
1
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
62
189


Example 19
125
8.9
42
3
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
60
218


Example 20
119
10.2
24
5
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
57
241


Example 21
123
10.8
11
11
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
54
263


Example 22
126
11.6
2.3
54
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
46
279


Example 23
118
9.2
1.6
72
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
41
286


Example 24
117
9.7
0.6
197
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
36
289


Example 25
112
6.8
0.4
308
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
31
291


Example 26
92
8.4
3.8
24
P2O5
Nanocrystal
53
234


Example 27
62
5.2
3.4
18
Al2O3
Nanocrystal
53
187


Example 28
81
6.7
3.1
26
CaO
Nanocrystal
45
227


Example 29
86
7.2
4.1
21
BaO
Nanocrystal
61
164


Example 30
79
4.8
3.3
24
Bi2O3
Nanocrystal
45
228


Example 31
87
9.1
3.8
23
SiO2
Nanocrystal
42
215


Example 32
101
7.5
4.0
25
Cr2O3
Nanocrystal
51
211


Example 33
98
10.3
4.1
24
Na2O
Nanocrystal
48
192


Example 34
117
9.5
4.3
27
ZnO
Nanocrystal
56
173


Example 35
91
6.9
4.1
22
CuO
Nanocrystal
69
109


Example 36
117
12.3
4.5
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
48
268


Example 37
106
9.5
4.2
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Crystalline
46
214


Comparative Example 1
5
1.1
0.2
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
9
291


Comparative Example 2
915
83
35
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
63
53









From Table 1, in a case where Sz was within the above-described range, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were satisfactory.


In contrast, in a case where Sz was out of the above-described range, it could be confirmed that one of the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core was poor.


Experiment 2

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 except that Rz and Ra in respective regions were calculated after performing the tertiary inclination correction on the obtained surface texture data on the basis of JIS B601 by using the software attached to the atomic force microscope, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 2.


Note that, Examples in 38 to 54 and 209 to 226, and Comparative Examples 3 and 4, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was Fe-7.6Si-2.3B-7.3Nb-1.1Cu. In Example 227, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was Fe-6.5Si-2.6B-2.5Cr. In Example 228, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was Fe-4.5Si.


In Examples 38 to 54, 209 to 216, 227, and 228, and Comparative Examples 3 and 4, as the powder-shaped coating material, phosphate-based glass having a composition of P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3 was used. As a specific composition, P2O5 was 50% by mass, ZnO was 12% by mass, R2O was 20% by mass, Al2O3 was 6% by mass, and the remainder was a sub-component.


Note that, the present inventors have also conducted similar experiments using a glass having a composition in which P2O5 was 60% by mass, ZnO was 20% by mass, R2O was 10% by mass, Al2O3 was 5% by mass, and the remainder was a sub-component, and the like, and it has been confirmed that results similar to results to be described later were obtained with respect to Rz and Ra.












TABLE 2









Soft
Dust core











Coating part
magnetic
Withstand
















Rz
Ra

Thickness T

metal
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(MPa)
(V/mm)



















Example 38
11
1.2
0.5
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
25
291


Example 39
22
2.3
1.0
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
32
287


Example 40
34
2.8
1.4
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
38
284


Example 41
41
3.6
1.7
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
45
279


Example 42
125
11.5
5.0
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
51
267


Example 43
397
38
15
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
54
251


Example 44
491
52
18
27
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
57
226


Example 45
592
65
24
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
60
187


Example 46
697
124
28
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
64
132


Example 47
25
3.2
1.0
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
36
287


Example 48
680
97
31
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
62
144


Example 49
33
4.1
1.52
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
44
286


Example 50
41
4.5
1.8
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
48
281


Example 51
50
6.2
2.0
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
51
275


Example 52
528
54
22
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
56
208


Example 53
572
62
26
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
58
197


Example 54
588
78
28
21
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
60
191


Example 209
107
9.4
54
2
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
61
184


Example 210
115
10.3
38
3
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
59
215


Example 211
104
8.9
17
6
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
56
238


Example 212
121
10.4
10
12
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
53
259


Example 213
112
9.6
2.0
57
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
47
274


Example 214
117
10.5
1.6
74
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
43
281


Example 215
114
11.2
0.6
198
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
38
285


Example 216
109
9.7
0.3
317
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
33
288


Example 217
81
7.2
3.7
22
P2O5
Nanocrystal
54
221


Example 218
60
6.7
2.5
24
Al2O3
Nanocrystal
52
196


Example 219
79
8.1
3.8
21
CaO
Nanocrystal
46
219


Example 220
78
8.2
4.1
19
BaO
Nanocrystal
62
172


Example 221
76
7.5
2.8
27
Bi2O3
Nanocrystal
43
224


Example 222
84
8.6
3.7
23
SiO2
Nanocrystal
48
206


Example 223
93
8.9
4.4
21
Cr2O3
Nanocrystal
49
212


Example 224
95
9.7
5.3
18
Na2O
Nanocrystal
47
203


Example 225
108
10.6
3.9
28
ZnO
Nanocrystal
52
182


Example 226
89
8.8
3.6
25
CuO
Nanocrystal
67
117


Example 227
113
10.3
4.7
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
49
271


Example 228
98
11.5
4.3
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Crystalline
48
228


Comparative
5
0.8
0.2
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
10
295


Example 3


Comparative
942
132
39
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
67
64


Example 4









From Table 2, in a case where Rz was within the above-described range, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were satisfactory.


In contrast, in a case where Rz was out of the above-described range, it could be confirmed that one of the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core was poor.


Experiment 3

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 1 except that a number ratio of the coated particles was set to values shown in Table 3, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 3.


Moreover, a soft magnetic metal powder was manufacture by the same method as in Example 1 of Experiment 1 except that average circularity of the soft magnetic metal particles was set to values shown in Table 4, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 4.


Furthermore, a soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 1 of Experiment 1 except that an average particle diameter of the soft magnetic metal powder was set to values shown in Table 5, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 5. Note that, in Examples 55 to 65, the composition of the soft magnetic metal and the material of the powder-shaped coating material were the same as in Example 1.













TABLE 3









Soft
Coated particle
Dust core













Coating part
magnetic
Number ratio of

Withstand

















Sz
Sa

Thickness T

metal
coated particle
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(%)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 55
84
8.1
3.7
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
95
51
276


Example 56
79
7.4
3.3
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
90
47
253


Example 57
82
7.9
3.9
21
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
85
46
241


















TABLE 4









Dust core











Coating part

Withstand
















Sz
Sa

Thickness T

Soft magnetic metal
Strength
voltage

















(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
Circularity
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 58
81
7.9
3.5
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.90
51
277


Example 59
88
8.4
3.5
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.85
48
258


Example 60
78
8.0
2.9
27
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.80
47
239



















TABLE 5









Soft magnetic metal











Average
Dust core













Coating part

particle

Withstand

















Sz
Sa

Thickness T


size
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(μm)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 61
112
9.3
5.3
21
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.1
24
343


Example 62
93
8.2
4.0
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.3
35
331


Example 63
88
7.6
3.7
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—A12O3
Nanocrystal
24
51
272


Example 64
73
8.3
3.3
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
98
34
214


Example 65
75
8.8
2.9
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—A12O3
Nanocrystal
154
25
184









From Table 3 to 5, in addition to a case where the surface roughness was within the above-described range, and in a case where the number ratio of the coated particles, the average circularity of the soft magnetic metal particles, and the average particle size of the soft magnetic metal powder were within the above-described ranges, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were satisfactory.


Experiment 4

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 36 of Experiment 1 except that an average crystal grain size of the initial fine crystals was set to values shown in Table 6, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 6. Note that, in Examples 66 to 70, the composition of the soft magnetic metal and the material of the powder-shaped coating material were the same as in Example 36.


Moreover, a soft magnetic metal powder was manufacture by the same method as in Example 1 of Experiment 1 except that the average crystal grain size of the nanocrystal was set to values shown in Table 7, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 7. Note that, in Examples 71 to 75, the composition of the soft magnetic metal and the material of the powder-shaped coating material were the same as in Example 1.












TABLE 6









Soft magnetic metal











Average crystal




grain size of
Dust core













Coating part

initial fine

Withstand

















Sz
Sa

Thickness T


crystals
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(nm)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 66
86
7.7
3.6
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
0.1
47
228


Example 67
97
9.5
4.2
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
0.3
50
265


Example 68
92
7.9
3.5
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
2
51
272


Example 69
79
9.3
3.2
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
10
48
254


Example 70
82
8.1
3.3
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
15
52
231



















TABLE 7









Soft magnetic metal











Average crystal
Dust core













Coating part

grain size of

Withstand

















Sz
Sa

Thickness T


nanocrystals
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(nm)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 71
96
9.2
3.8
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—al2O3
Nanocrystal
2
52
236


Example 72
73
8.3
2.7
27
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
5
47
247


Example 73
93
7.5
3.9
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
21
51
272


Example 74
85
9.4
3.7
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
29
49
265


Example 75
92
7.6
3.4
27
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
52
47
235









From Table 6 and Table 7, in addition to a case where the surface roughness was within the above-described range, in a case where the average crystal grain size of the initial fine crystals and the average crystal grain size of the nanocrystal were within the above described ranges, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were compatible with each other at a high level.


Experiment 5

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 1 of Experiment 1 except that the amount of P2O5 in P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3 glass was set to values shown in Table 8, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 8. Note that, in Examples 76 to 78, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was the same as in Example 1.


Moreover, a soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 1 of Experiment 1 except that the P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3 glass was changed to Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2 glass or BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3 glass, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Tables 9 and 10. Note that, in Examples 79 to 84, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was the same as in Example 1. In a composition of the Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2 glass, Bi2O3 was 40% by mass to 60% by mass, ZnO was 10% by mass to 15% by mass, B2O3 was 15% by mass to 25% by mass, SiO2 was 15% by mass to 20% by mass, and the remainder was a sub-component. In a composition of the BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3 glass, BaO was 35% by mass to 40% by mass, ZnO was 30% by mass to 40% by mass, B2O3 was 5% by mass to 15% by mass, SiO2 was 5% by mass to 15% by mass, Al2O3 was 5% by mass to 10% by mass, and the remainder was a sub-component.












TABLE 8









Coating part












Amount of
Soft
Dust core






















P2O5
magnetic

Withstand



Sz
Sa

Thickness T

contained
metal
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
(wt %)
Structure
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 76
92
9.5
4.2
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
60
Nanocrystal
51
272


Example 77
84
8.6
3.5
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
50
Nanocrystal
54
246


Example 78
93
7.4
3.7
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
40
Nanocrystal
49
227



















TABLE 9









Coating part












Amount of
Soft
Dust core






















Bi2O3
magnetic

Withstand



Sz
Sa

Thickness T

contained
metal
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
(wt %)
Structure
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 79
78
6.7
3.3
24
Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2
60
Nanocrystal
48
253


Example 80
85
7.8
3.7
23
Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2
50
Nanocrystal
51
234


Example 81
87
8.4
3.6
24
Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2
40
Nanocrystal
44
217



















TABLE 10









Coating part













Amount of
Amount of
Soft
Dust core























B2O3
SiO2
magnetic

Withstand



Sz
Sa

Thickness T

contained
contained
metal
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
(wt %)
(wt %)
Structure
(MPa)
(V/mm)





















Example 82
95
8.7
3.7
26
BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3
15
15
Nanocrystal
56
267


Example 83
82
7.9
3.4
24
BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3
10
10
Nanocrystal
53
249


Example 84
92
9.5
3.7
25
BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3
5
5
Nanocrystal
58
237









From Tables 8 to 10, in addition to a case where the surface roughness was within the above-described range, in a case where oxide glass was the above-described glass, and in a case where the composition of the oxide glass was within the above-described range, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were compatible at a high level.


Experiment 6

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 36 of Experiment 1 except that the composition of the soft magnetic metal was set to compositions shown in Tables 11 and 12, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same experiment as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Tables 11 and 12. Note that, in Examples 85 to 142, the soft magnetic metal was an amorphous alloy, and the average crystal grain size of the initial fine crystals was 0.3 to 10 nm. In addition, the material of the powder-shaped coating material was the same as in Example 1.











TABLE 11









Dust core












Coating part
Fe(1−(a+b+c+d+e+f))MaBbPcSidCeSf (α = β = 0 )

Withstand





















Sz
Sa

Thickness T

M(Nb)
B
P
Si
C
S
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Fe
a
b
c
d
e
f
(MPa)
(V/mm)
























Example 85
138
12.9
5.8
24
0.890
0.000
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
65
292


Example 86
125
12.3
4.8
26
0.790
0.100
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
62
286


Example 87
124
12.5
5.0
25
0.690
0.200
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
66
292


Example 88
117
11.3
4.7
25
0.590
0.300
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
52
273


Example 89
127
13.2
5.3
24
0.910
0.060
0.000
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
67
287


Example 90
125
12.2
5.0
25
0.710
0.060
0.200
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
68
289


Example 91
124
10.7
4.4
28
0.610
0.060
0.300
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
64
286


Example 92
124
10.7
4.4
28
0.510
0.060
0.400
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
53
274


Example 93
134
12.6
5.2
26
0.850
0.060
0.080
0.000
0.010
0.000
0.0000
61
285


Example 94
116
12.6
4.8
24
0.650
0.060
0.080
0.200
0.010
0.000
0.0000
56
279


Example 95
123
11.4
4.9
25
0.550
0.060
0.080
0.300
0.010
0.000
0.0000
57
280


Example 96
123
11.4
4.9
25
0.450
0.060
0.080
0.400
0.010
0.000
0.0000
48
271


Example 97
119
12.8
5.2
23
0.840
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.000
0.000
0.0000
64
281


Example 98
126
10.4
5.3
24
0.640
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.200
0.000
0.0000
65
283


Example 99
131
12.6
5.2
25
0.540
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.300
0.000
0.0000
62
285


Example 100
131
12.6
5.2
25
0.440
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.400
0.000
0.0000
51
274


Example 101
124
11.3
5.2
24
0.830
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
58
281


Example 102
118
11.6
5.1
23
0.630
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.200
0.0000
62
285


Example 103
125
12.5
5.0
25
0.530
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.300
0.0000
63
284


Example 104
127
12.4
5.1
25
0.430
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.400
0.0000
49
276


Example 105
132
12.8
5.5
24
0.830
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
57
282


Example 106
125
12.3
5.7
22
0.810
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0200
62
286


Example 107
122
12.5
4.7
26
0.800
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0300
63
284


Example 108
122
12.5
4.7
26
0.790
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0400
51
275



















TABLE 12









(Fe(1−(α+β)X1αX2β)0.750B0.150Si0.100












X1
X2
Dust core













Coating part
(atomic number
(atomic number

Withstand
















Sz
Sa

Thickness T
ratio)
ratio)
Strength
voltage


















(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Element
0.750 × α
Element
0.750 β β
(MPa)
(V/mm)





















Example 109
123
12.3
5.1
24

0.0000

0.0000
62
283


Example 110
125
12.6
5.2
24
Co
0.2000

0.0000
63
285


Example 111
127
12.4
4.7
27
Co
0.5000

0.0000
61
284


Example 112
118
11.5
4.5
26
Co
0.7000

0.0000
56
277


Example 113
124
12.1
5.0
25
Ni
0.2000

0.0000
61
285


Example 114
135
11.3
5.4
25
Ni
0.5000

0.0000
57
284


Example 115
125
11.6
5.2
24
Ni
0.7000

0.0000
53
281


Example 116
116
11.7
4.5
26

0.0000
Al
0.0200
63
284


Example 117
123
12.3
4.9
25

0.0000
Al
0.0400
58
284


Example 118
125
12.7
4.8
26

0.0000
Al
0.0600
57
279


Example 119
113
11.8
4.0
28

0.0000
Zn
0.0200
64
282


Example 120
124
10.1
5.2
24

0.0000
Zn
0.0400
63
283


Example 121
127
12.7
5.8
22

0.0000
Zn
0.0600
59
278


Example 122
128
11.2
4.4
29

0.0000
Sn
0.0200
63
283


Example 123
123
11.8
4.9
25

0.0000
Sn
0.0400
62
282


Example 124
126
12.5
5.3
24

0.0000
Sn
0.0600
55
275


Example 125
128
12.5
4.6
28

0.0000
Cu
0.0200
63
284


Example 126
123
12.7
5.3
23

0.0000
Cu
0.0400
62
283


Example 127
121
12.4
4.5
27

0.0000
Cu
0.0600
57
278


Example 128
123
12.4
4.6
27

0.0000
Cr
0.0200
64
285


Example 129
127
10.7
5.1
25

0.0000
Cr
0.0400
63
283


Example 130
128
13.6
5.1
25

0.0000
Cr
0.0600
58
277


Example 131
113
11.3
4.7
24

0.0000
Bi
0.0200
62
282


Example 132
125
12.9
4.8
26

0.0000
Bi
0.0400
63
285


Example 133
125
12.4
4.8
26

0.0000
Bi
0.0600
59
281


Example 134
124
12.3
4.6
27

0.0000
La
0.0200
64
285


Example 135
126
12.8
5.0
25

0.0000
La
0.0400
63
283


Example 136
124
12.6
5.2
24

0.0000
La
0.0600
57
279


Example 137
125
11.8
5.2
24

0.0000
Y
0.0200
64
284


Example 138
123
13.6
4.9
25

0.0000
Y
0.0400
62
282


Example 139
124
11.5
4.8
26

0.0000
Y
0.0600
56
276


Example 140
127
12.1
5.3
24

0.0000
O
0.0200
63
283


Example 141
118
12.6
5.1
23

0.0000
O
0.0400
63
284


Example 142
123
10.6
4.9
25

0.0000
O
0.0600
58
278









Experiment 7

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 1 of Experiment 1 except that the composition of the soft magnetic metal was set to compositions shown in Tables 13 to 15, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Tables 13 to 15. Note that, in Examples 143 to 208, the soft magnetic metal was a nanocrystalline alloy, and the average crystal grain size of the nanocrystal was 5 to 30 nm. In addition, the material of the powder-shaped coating material was the same as in Example 1.











TABLE 13









Dust core












Coating part
Fe(1−(a+b+c+d+e+f))MaBbPcSidCeSf (α = β = 0)

Withstand





















Sz
Sa

Thickness T

M(Nb)
B
P
Si
C
S
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Fe
a
b
c
d
e
f
(MPa)
(V/mm)
























Example 143
123
12.0
5.1
24
0.870
0.000
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
62
285


Example 144
136
11.3
5.2
26
0.770
0.100
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
67
293


Example 145
117
10.7
5.1
23
0.670
0.200
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
63
287


Example 146
127
12.4
5.1
25
0.570
0.300
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
56
282


Example 147
135
13.7
5.6
24
0.890
0.060
0.000
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
59
286


Example 148
124
11.4
5.0
25
0.690
0.060
0.200
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
64
291


Example 149
142
13.6
5.5
26
0.590
0.060
0.300
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
58
286


Example 150
121
11.8
4.7
26
0.490
0.060
0.400
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
54
283


Example 151
126
13.2
5.3
24
0.840
0.060
0.080
0.000
0.020
0.000
0.0000
62
286


Example 152
123
11.4
4.9
25
0.640
0.060
0.080
0.200
0.020
0.000
0.0000
63
289


Example 153
116
10.2
4.6
25
0.540
0.060
0.080
0.300
0.020
0.000
0.0000
61
286


Example 154
117
10.6
4.9
24
0.440
0.060
0.080
0.400
0.020
0.000
0.0000
57
282


Example 155
113
9.5
4.9
23
0.830
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.000
0.000
0.0000
63
285


Example 156
131
11.4
6.0
22
0.630
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.200
0.000
0.0000
64
288


Example 157
116
12.4
5.0
23
0.530
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.300
0.000
0.0000
62
287


Example 158
124
12.9
5.4
23
0.430
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.400
0.000
0.0000
58
281


Example 159
127
9.8
5.3
24
0.810
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
67
286


Example 160
126
11.3
5.5
23
0.610
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.200
0.0000
67
291


Example 161
131
12.8
5.0
26
0.510
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.300
0.0000
63
285


Example 162
127
13.4
4.9
26
0.410
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.400
0.0000
56
280


Example 163
125
10.4
5.2
24
0.810
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
63
285


Example 164
129
13.4
5.0
26
0.790
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0200
65
293


Example 165
134
11.5
5.4
25
0.780
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0300
64
286


Example 166
124
12.6
5.6
22
0.770
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0400
59
282


















TABLE 14









Dust core











Coating part

Withstand















Sz
Sa

Thickness T
Fe0.810M0.060B0.080P0.050
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
M
(MPa)
(V/mm)


















Example 167
113
9.5
4.9
23
Nb
63
284


Example 168
123
10.3
4.9
25
Hf
62
285


Example 169
121
11.6
4.7
26
Zr
63
284


Example 170
116
10.2
4.6
25
Ta
64
283


Example 171
132
9.7
5.7
23
Mo
62
285


Example 172
124
11.4
4.6
27
W
63
283


Example 173
127
13.4
5.3
24
V
62
284


Example 174
135
12.2
5.2
26
Ti
64
285



















TABLE 15









(Fe(1−(α+β)X1αX2β)0.810M0.070B0.090P0.030












X1
X2
Dust core













Coating part
(atomic number
(atomic number

Withstand
















Sz
Sa

Thickness T
ratio)
ratio)
Strength
voltage


















(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Element
0.810 × α
Element
0.810 × β
(MPa)
(V/mm)





















Example 175
113
9.5
4.9
23

0.0000

0.0000
61
284


Example 176
125
11.5
5.0
25
Co
0.2000

0.0000
59
287


Example 177
131
10.6
5.7
23
Co
0.5000

0.0000
59
286


Example 178
123
12.7
4.7
26
Co
0.7000

0.0000
54
282


Example 179
123
13.6
5.6
22
Ni
0.2000

0.0000
57
285


Example 180
129
12.3
5.0
26
Ni
0.5000

0.0000
58
287


Example 181
122
12.5
4.5
27
Ni
0.7000

0.0000
53
283


Example 182
124
11.2
4.8
26

0.0000
Al
0.0200
63
285


Example 183
126
12.7
5.3
24

0.0000
Al
0.0400
64
286


Example 184
132
12.6
5.5
24

0.0000
Al
0.0600
55
282


Example 185
124
11.7
4.8
26

0.0000
Zn
0.0200
63
286


Example 186
138
10.9
5.5
25

0.0000
Zn
0.0400
62
288


Example 187
123
12.5
4.6
27

0.0000
Zn
0.0600
54
279


Example 188
116
12.7
4.6
25

0.0000
Sn
0.0200
63
285


Example 189
124
12.3
5.4
23

0.0000
Sn
0.0400
63
289


Example 190
127
12.6
5.5
23

0.0000
Sn
0.0600
52
281


Example 191
132
12.8
5.5
24

0.0000
Cu
0.0200
64
284


Example 192
125
12.2
4.8
26

0.0000
Cu
0.0400
62
288


Example 193
121
11.4
4.5
27

0.0000
Cu
0.0600
54
282


Example 194
116
12.3
4.5
26

0.0000
Cr
0.0200
62
284


Example 195
112
12.6
4.1
27

0.0000
Cr
0.0400
63
285


Example 196
123
10.7
4.7
26

0.0000
Cr
0.0600
56
278


Example 197
123
12.8
4.7
26

0.0000
Bi
0.0200
63
283


Example 198
115
11.6
4.6
25

0.0000
Bi
0.0400
63
284


Example 199
136
13.1
5.7
24

0.0000
Bi
0.0600
52
277


Example 200
121
12.3
4.8
25

0.0000
La
0.0200
62
284


Example 201
123
12.1
5.1
24

0.0000
La
0.0400
63
287


Example 202
134
11.2
5.8
23

0.0000
La
0.0600
52
281


Example 203
129
11.3
5.4
24

0.0000
Y
0.0200
63
285


Example 204
114
13.5
4.4
26

0.0000
Y
0.0400
64
284


Example 205
128
12.8
4.9
26

0.0000
Y
0.0600
54
278


Example 206
126
12.5
5.3
24

0.0000
O
0.0200
63
283


Example 207
135
13.6
5.0
27

0.0000
O
0.0400
64
285


Example 208
127
11.6
4.9
26

0.0000
O
0.0600
53
277









From Tables 11 to 15, in addition to a case where the surface roughness was within the above-described range, in a case where the composition of the soft magnetic metal was within the above-described range, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were compatible with each other at a high level.


Experiment 8

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 38 of Experiment 2 except that the number ratio of the coated particles was set to values shown in Table 16, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. That is, Rz and Ra were calculated. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 16.


Moreover, a soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 38 of Experiment 2 except that the average circularity of the soft magnetic metal particles was set to values shown in Table 17, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 17.


Furthermore, a soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 38 of Experiment 2 except that the average particle diameter of the soft magnetic metal powder was set to values shown in Table 18, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 18. Note that, in Examples 229 to 239, the composition of the soft magnetic metal, and the material of the powder-shaped coating material were the same as in Example 38.













TABLE 16









Soft
Coated particle
Dust core













Coating part
magnetic
Number ratio of

Withstand

















Rz
Ra

Thickness T

metal
coated particle
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(%)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 229
82
7.9
3.4
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
95
53
281


Example 230
77
7.2
3.5
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
90
48
263


Example 231
79
7.5
3.2
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
85
45
244




















TABLE 17









Coating part

Dust core











Thickness

Withstand
















Rz
Ra

T

Soft magnetic metal
Strength
voltage

















(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
Circularity
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 232
79
7.1
3.6
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.90
53
276


Example 233
84
7.8
3.7
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.85
49
258


Example 234
71
7.4
2.7
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.80
46
242




















TABLE 18









Coating part
Soft magnetic metal
Dust core




















Thickness


Average

Withstand



Rz
Ra

T


particle size
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(μm)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 235
105
9.1
4.0
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.1
22
351


Example 236
87
7.6
4.1
21
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
0.3
36
337


Example 237
79
7.3
3.4
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
26
53
275


Example 238
68
6.5
2.7
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
99
32
226


Example 239
71
6.7
3.1
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
146
25
192









From Tables 16 to 18, in addition to a case where the line roughness was within the above-described range, and in a case where the number ratio of the coated particles, the average circularity of the soft magnetic metal particles, and the average particle size of the soft magnetic metal powder were within the above-described ranges, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were satisfactory.


Experiment 9

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 227 of Experiment 2 except that the average crystal grain size of the initial fine crystals was set to values shown in Table 19, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 19. Note that, in Examples 240 to 244, the composition of the soft magnetic metal and the material of the powder-shaped coating material were the same as in Example 227.


Moreover, a soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 38 of Experiment 2 except that the average crystal grain size of the nanocrystal was set to values shown in Table 20, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 20. Note that, in Examples 245 to 249, the composition of the soft magnetic metal and the material of the powder-shaped coating material were the same as in Example 38.













TABLE 19









Coating part
Soft magnetic metal
Dust core




















Thickness


Average crystal grain

Withstand



Rz
Ra

T


size of initial fine crystals
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(nm)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 240
78
7.1
3.1
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
0.1
45
215


Example 241
90
8.4
3.9
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
0.3
48
259


Example 242
84
7.3
3.5
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
2
52
281


Example 243
74
6.8
2.7
27
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
10
50
262


Example 244
77
7.5
3.3
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Amorphous
15
49
228




















TABLE 20









Coating part
Soft magnetic metal
Dust core




















Thickness


Average crystal grain

Withstand



Rz
Ra

T


size of Nanocrystals
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(nm)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 245
87
8.4
3.6
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
1
52
234


Example 246
83
7.8
3.6
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
5
47
248


Example 247
73
7.2
2.8
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
18
51
279


Example 248
81
7.9
2.9
28
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
30
49
267


Example 249
76
7.5
3.3
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
54
47
232









From Tables 19 and 20, in addition to a case where the line roughness was within the above-described range, in a case where the average crystal grain size of the initial fine crystals and the average crystal grain size of the nanocrystal were within the above-described ranges, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were compatible with each other at a high level.


Experiment 10

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 38 of Experiment 2 except that the amount of P2O5 in the P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3 glass was set to values shown in Table 21, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 21. Note that, in Examples 250 to 252, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was the same as in Example 38.


Moreover, a soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 38 of Experiment 2 except that the P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3 glass was changed to Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2 glass or BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3 glass, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Tables 22 and 23.


Note that, in Examples 253 to 258, the composition of the soft magnetic metal was the same as in Example 38. In Examples 253 to 255, in the composition of the Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2 glass, Bi2O3 was 40% by mass to 60% by mass, ZnO was 10% by mass to 15% by mass, B2O3 was 15% by mass to 25% by mass, SiO2 was 15% by mass to 20% by mass, and the remainder was a sub-component. In Example 256 to 258, in the composition of the BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3 glass, BaO was 35% by mass to 40% by mass, ZnO was 30% by mass to 40% by mass, B2O3 was 5% by mass to 15% by mass, SiO2 was 5% by mass to 15% by mass, Al2O3 was 5% by mass to 10% by mass, and the remainder was a sub-component.












TABLE 21









Coating part












Amount of
Soft
Dust core




















Thickness

P2O5
magnetic

Withstand



Rz
Ra

T

contained
metal
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
(wt %)
Structure
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 250
82
9.3
3.2
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
60
Nanocrystal
52
266


Example 251
77
8.3
3.3
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
50
Nanocrystal
51
239


Example 252
84
7.1
3.8
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
40
Nanocrystal
47
214



















TABLE 22









Coating part












Amount of
Soft
Dust core




















Thickness

Bi2O3
magnetic

Withstand



Rz
Ra

T

contained
metal
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
(wt %)
Structure
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 253
73
7.1
3.2
23
Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2
60
Nanocrystal
47
262


Example 254
79
7.4
3.3
24
Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2
50
Nanocrystal
53
237


Example 255
84
7.7
3.5
24
Bi2O3—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2
40
Nanocrystal
41
221



















TABLE 23









Coating part













Amount of
Amount of
Soft
Dust core





















Thickness

B2O3
SiO2
magnetic

Withstand



Rz
Ra

T

contained
contained
metal
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
(wt %)
(wt %)
Structure
(MPa)
(V/mm)





















Example 256
82
8.5
3.7
22
BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3
15
15
Nanocrystal
54
272


Example 257
74
7.4
2.8
26
BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3
10
10
Nanocrystal
55
247


Example 258
86
8.8
3.7
23
BaO—ZnO—B2O3—SiO2—Al2O3
5
5
Nanocrystal
53
229









From Tables 21 to 23, in addition to a case where the line roughness was within the above-described range, in a case where the oxide glass was the above-described glass, and the composition of the oxide glass was within the above-described range, in could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were compatible at a high level.


Experiment 11

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 227 of Experiment 2 except that the composition of the soft magnetic metal was set to compositions shown in Tables 24 and 25, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Tables 24 and 25. Note that, in Examples 259 to 316, the soft magnetic metal was an amorphous alloy, and the average crystal grain size of the initial fine crystals was 0.3 to 10 nm. Moreover, the material of the powder-shaped coating material was the same as in Example 227.













TABLE 24









Coating part

Dust core












Thickness
Fe(1−(a+b+c+d+e+f))MaBbPcSidCeSf (α = β = 0)

Withstand





















Rz
Ra

T

M (Nb)
B
P
Si
C
S
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Fe
a
b
c
d
e
f
(MPa)
(V/mm)
























Example 259
125
11.6
4.8
26
0.890
0.000
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
64
288


Example 260
117
11.8
4.9
24
0.790
0.100
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
66
291


Example 261
118
11.4
5.1
23
0.690
0.200
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
61
285


Example 262
106
10.5
4.4
24
0.590
0.300
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
57
281


Example 263
122
12.3
4.9
25
0.910
0.060
0.000
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
66
287


Example 264
114
11.6
4.4
26
0.710
0.060
0.200
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
67
288


Example 265
119
9.6
4.4
27
0.610
0.060
0.300
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
63
284


Example 266
116
10.1
4.5
26
0.510
0.060
0.400
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
56
275


Example 267
127
12.2
5.3
24
0.850
0.060
0.080
0.000
0.010
0.000
0.0000
61
283


Example 268
109
11.3
4.7
23
0.650
0.060
0.080
0.200
0.010
0.000
0.0000
62
284


Example 269
115
10.3
4.4
26
0.550
0.060
0.080
0.300
0.010
0.000
0.0000
57
279


Example 270
121
11.2
5.0
24
0.450
0.060
0.080
0.400
0.010
0.000
0.0000
52
273


Example 271
117
11.4
5.3
22
0.840
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.000
0.000
0.0000
63
282


Example 272
123
9.8
4.9
25
0.640
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.200
0.000
0.0000
64
283


Example 273
125
11.2
5.4
23
0.540
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.300
0.000
0.0000
62
281


Example 274
124
11.6
4.8
26
0.440
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.400
0.000
0.0000
54
275


Example 275
113
10.8
4.9
23
0.830
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
58
284


Example 276
115
10.2
4.8
24
0.630
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.200
0.0000
61
287


Example 277
125
10.8
5.4
23
0.530
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.300
0.0000
59
281


Example 278
122
11.8
4.9
25
0.430
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.400
0.0000
51
274


Example 279
129
11.5
5.6
23
0.830
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0000
62
285


Example 280
119
11.3
5.0
24
0.810
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0200
63
287


Example 281
118
12.2
4.4
27
0.800
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0300
60
283


Example 282
114
11.4
4.6
25
0.790
0.060
0.080
0.020
0.010
0.000
0.0400
52
274




















TABLE 25









Coating part
(Fe(1−(α+β)X1αX2β)0.750B0.150Si0.100
Dust core



















Thickness
X1
X2

Withstand



Rz
Ra

T
(atomic number ratio)
(atomic number ratio)
Strength
voltage


















(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Element
0.750 × α
Element
0.750 × β
(MPa)
(V/mmm)





















Example 283
118
10.3
4.9
24

0.0000

0.0000
61
284


Example 284
121
11.5
4.3
28
Co
0.2000

0.0000
65
286


Example 285
122
11.4
5.5
22
Co
0.5000

0.0000
63
283


Example 286
116
10.5
5.0
23
Co
0.7000

0.0000
57
279


Example 287
117
10.3
4.3
27
Ni
0.2000

0.0000
64
288


Example 288
127
12.8
6.0
21
Ni
0.5000

0.0000
59
285


Example 289
119
10.6
4.8
25
Ni
0.7000

0.0000
54
282


Example 290
108
10.2
4.7
23

0.0000
Al
0.0200
64
287


Example 291
114
9.8
5.4
21

0.0000
Al
0.0400
60
284


Example 292
118
10.3
5.4
22

0.0000
Al
0.0600
56
280


Example 293
109
9.2
3.9
28

0.0000
Zn
0.0200
65
285


Example 294
117
10.7
5.3
22

0.0000
Zn
0.0400
62
283


Example 295
123
11.2
4.9
25

0.0000
Zn
0.0600
58
279


Example 296
124
10.3
5.0
25

0.0000
Sn
0.0200
63
286


Example 297
117
10.8
5.6
21

0.0000
Sn
0.0400
61
282


Example 298
123
11.2
4.7
26

0.0000
Sn
0.0600
56
278


Example 299
122
12.3
5.3
23

0.0000
Cu
0.0200
62
286


Example 300
115
10.8
4.3
27

0.0000
Cu
0.0400
61
285


Example 301
116
10.4
4.1
28

0.0000
Cu
0.0600
57
281


Example 302
113
11.2
4.9
23

0.0000
Cr
0.0200
63
286


Example 303
122
12.7
5.1
24

0.0000
Cr
0.0400
61
284


Example 304
121
11.4
5.8
21

0.0000
Cr
0.0600
57
279


Example 305
107
10.6
4.1
26

0.0000
Bi
0.0200
63
284


Example 306
113
10.1
5.1
22

0.0000
Bi
0.0400
62
284


Example 307
120
11.7
4.8
25

0.0000
Bi
0.0600
57
280


Example 308
117
9.8
4.5
26

0.0000
La
0.0200
62
285


Example 309
121
12.9
5.8
21

0.0000
La
0.0400
62
284


Example 310
118
11.5
5.1
23

0.0000
La
0.0600
59
278


Example 311
122
10.1
4.4
28

0.0000
Y
0.0200
62
284


Example 312
115
12.5
5.2
22

0.0000
Y
0.0400
61
283


Example 313
118
10.3
4.9
24

0.0000
Y
0.0600
57
278


Example 314
124
13.5
5.0
25

0.0000
O
0.0200
63
285


Example 315
112
9.7
4.1
27

0.0000
O
0.0400
62
284


Example 316
119
11.7
5.7
21

0.0000
O
0.0600
59
281









Experiment 12

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 38 of Experiment 2 except that the composition of the soft magnetic metal was set to compositions shown in Tables 26 to 28, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Tables 26 to 29. Note that, in Examples 317 to 382, the soft magnetic metal was a nanocrystalline alloy, and the average crystal grain size of the nanocrystal was 5 to 30 nm. In addition, the material of the powder-shaped coating material was the same as in Example 38.













TABLE 26









Coating part

Dust core












Thickness
Fe(1−(a+b+c+d+e+ f))MaBbPcSidCeSf (α = β = 0)

Withstand





















Rz
Ra

T

M(Nb)
B
P
Si
C
S
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Fe
a
b
c
d
e
f
(MPa)
(V/mm)
























Example 317
116
11.7
4.3
27
0.870
0.000
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
65
289


Example 318
123
11.1
4.4
28
0.770
0.100
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
68
294


Example 319
105
9.8
4.4
24
0.670
0.200
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
64
286


Example 320
111
11.9
4.3
26
0.570
0.300
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
61
283


Example 321
129
12.7
6.1
21
0.890
0.060
0.000
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
67
290


Example 322
112
10.9
4.1
27
0.690
0.060
0.200
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
68
293


Example 323
129
13.1
5.9
22
0.590
0.060
0.300
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
65
287


Example 324
108
10.1
3.9
28
0.490
0.060
0.400
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
59
283


Example 325
115
11.2
4.4
26
0.840
0.060
0.080
0.000
0.020
0.000
0.0000
64
287


Example 326
113
12.2
5.4
21
0.640
0.060
0.080
0.200
0.020
0.000
0.0000
65
289


Example 327
105
9.6
4.2
25
0.540
0.060
0.080
0.300
0.020
0.000
0.0000
63
284


Example 328
102
10.4
4.4
23
0.440
0.060
0.080
0.400
0.020
0.000
0.0000
58
280


Example 329
108
11.6
4.2
26
0.830
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.000
0.000
0.0000
64
286


Example 330
119
12.2
4.4
27
0.630
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.200
0.000
0.0000
66
287


Example 331
103
10.3
4.9
21
0.530
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.300
0.000
0.0000
63
284


Example 332
116
12.1
5.3
22
0.430
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.400
0.000
0.0000
60
279


Example 333
115
10.9
4.1
28
0.810
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
62
286


Example 334
121
12.3
5.3
23
0.610
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.200
0.0000
63
288


Example 335
118
11.5
4.5
26
0.510
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.300
0.0000
61
285


Example 336
119
11.3
5.0
24
0.410
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.400
0.0000
56
281


Example 337
110
10.6
5.2
21
0.810
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0000
64
287


Example 338
121
11.9
4.5
27
0.790
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0200
65
289


Example 339
122
12.7
5.8
21
0.780
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0300
62
284


Example 340
114
10.4
4.6
25
0.770
0.060
0.080
0.030
0.020
0.000
0.0400
56
277




















TABLE 27









Coating part

Dust core


















Thickness


Withstand



Rz
Ra

T
Fe0.810M0.060B0.080P0.050
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
M
(MPa)
(V/mm)


















Example 341
104
10.5
3.7
28
Nb
64
286


Example 342
111
10.3
4.4
25
Hf
63
284


Example 343
117
12.3
4.0
29
Zr
63
285


Example 344
102
9.4
4.6
22
Ta
65
284


Example 345
119
10.9
5.7
21
Mo
63
286


Example 346
116
11.5
4.3
27
W
62
282


Example 347
117
10.8
4.5
26
V
63
283


Example 348
127
12.8
5.8
22
Ti
65
284




















TABLE 28









Coating part
(Fe(1−(α+β)X1αX2β)0.810M0.070B0.090P0.030
Dust core



















Thickness
X1
X2

Withstand



Rz
Ra

T
(atomic number ratio)
(atomic number ratio)
Strength
voltage


















(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Element
0.810 × α
Element
0.810 × β
(MPa)
(V/mm)





















Example 349
109
10.8
4.2
26

0.0000

0.0000
62
286


Example 350
114
10.9
4.2
27
Co
0.2000

0.0000
66
288


Example 351
122
12.5
5.8
21
Co
0.5000

0.0000
64
287


Example 352
119
9.1
4.3
28
Co
0.7000

0.0000
58
284


Example 353
115
12.1
5.0
23
Ni
0.2000

0.0000
65
290


Example 354
121
11.7
4.3
28
Ni
0.5000

0.0000
63
288


Example 355
109
8.9
4.5
24
Ni
0.7000

0.0000
57
285


Example 356
114
11.3
4.4
26

0.0000
Al
0.0200
66
289


Example 357
120
12.5
5.5
22

0.0000
Al
0.0400
62
287


Example 358
120
10.4
5.2
23

0.0000
Al
0.0600
58
283


Example 359
110
11.7
5.2
21

0.0000
Zn
0.0200
67
288


Example 360
125
17.1
6.3
20

0.0000
Zn
0.0400
65
286


Example 361
113
12.5
4.5
25

0.0000
Zn
0.0600
60
282


Example 362
102
7.9
3.8
27

0.0000
Sn
0.0200
65
287


Example 363
119
13.6
5.7
21

0.0000
Sn
0.0400
63
285


Example 364
114
10.0
4.4
26

0.0000
Sn
0.0600
58
282


Example 365
126
11.1
5.3
24

0.0000
Cu
0.0200
64
289


Example 366
112
12.2
4.0
28

0.0000
Cu
0.0400
62
287


Example 367
115
17.9
5.8
20

0.0000
Cu
0.0600
60
283


Example 368
105
7.8
5.0
21

0.0000
Cr
0.0200
65
292


Example 369
99
7.4
4.7
21

0.0000
Cr
0.0400
63
291


Example 370
115
12.9
4.4
26

0.0000
Cr
0.0600
60
287


Example 371
113
10.6
4.9
23

0.0000
Bi
0.0200
63
287


Example 372
115
15.3
4.4
26

0.0000
Bi
0.0400
62
285


Example 373
128
10.5
6.1
21

0.0000
Bi
0.0600
59
281


Example 374
110
12.4
4.8
23

0.0000
La
0.0200
62
287


Example 375
114
12.1
4.1
28

0.0000
La
0.0400
61
285


Example 376
125
13.3
5.0
25

0.0000
La
0.0600
59
282


Example 377
117
10.9
4.3
27

0.0000
Y
0.0200
63
286


Example 378
102
12.6
4.9
21

0.0000
Y
0.0400
62
285


Example 379
112
10.1
4.3
26

0.0000
Y
0.0600
60
283


Example 380
120
12.5
4.8
25

0.0000
O
0.0200
65
293


Example 381
122
12.2
4.5
27

0.0000
O
0.0400
64
291


Example 382
113
9.7
5.7
20

0.0000
O
0.0600
61
285









From Tables 24 to 28, in addition to a case where the line roughness was within the above-described range, in a case where the composition of the soft magnetic metal was within the above-described range, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were compatible at a high level.


Experiment 13

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 1 of Experiment 1, and the surface roughness (Sz and Sa) and the line roughness (Rz and Ra) were calculated with respect to the soft magnetic metal particles on which the coating part was formed by using the same measurement device as in Experiment 1 and Experiment 2 under the same measurement conditions. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 29.













TABLE 29









Coating part
Soft
Dust core

























Thickness

magnetic

Withstand



Sz
Sa

Rz
Ra

T

metal
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(MPa)
(V/mm)






















Example 383
25
1.9
1.1
18
2.8
0.8
22
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
28
291


Example 384
46
3.2
2.0
32
4.6
1.4
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
41
287


Example 385
93
8.6
3.7
72
9.3
2.9
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
48
285


Example 386
115
12
4.8
82
11
3.4
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
49
284


Example 387
162
15
5.8
123
15
4.4
28
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
52
278


Example 388
271
21
10.8
189
23
7.6
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
53
271


Example 389
364
28
15.8
272
37
11.8
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
56
254


Example 390
478
41
17.7
378
42
14.0
27
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
57
236


Example 391
567
47
23.6
471
58
19.6
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
60
213


Example 392
682
59
29.7
592
76
25.7
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
62
164









From Table 29, it could be confirmed that the surface roughness and the line roughness correspond to each other, and it could be confirmed that in a case where the line roughness was within the above-described range and in a case where the surface roughness was within the above-described range, the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were compatible with each other.


Experiment 14

A soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 1 of Experiment 1 except that the coating ratio of the coated particles was set to values shown in Table 30, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 30.


Moreover, a soft magnetic metal powder was manufactured by the same method as in Example 38 of Experiment 2 except that the coating ratio of the coated particles was set to values shown in Table 31, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 2 was performed. In addition, a dust core was manufactured by the same method as in Experiment 1 by using the obtained powder, and the same evaluation as in Experiment 1 was performed. The results are shown in Table 31.


Note that, the coating ratio was measured as follows. The coating ratio was measured as follows with respect to the soft magnetic metal particles on which the coating part was formed. As a measurement device, a scanning electron microscope (SU5000, manufactured by Hitachi High-Tech Science Corporation) was used. An observation mode of the scanning electron microscope was set to compositions image, and a square region of 100 μm×100 μm was selected, and the composition image of the region was obtained. Acquisition of the composition image was performed with respect to 10 locations. The obtained composition image was binarized by using commercially available image analysis software so that the coating part was shown in a black color and a region in which an uncoated metal was exposed was shown in a white color, and then a ratio of an area of the coating part with respect to a total area of the particle was set as the coating ratio.












TABLE 30









Coated













Coating part
Soft
particle
Dust core




















Thickness

magnetic
Coating

Withstand



Sz
Sa

T

metal
ratio
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Sz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(%)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 393
94
8.7
3.9
24
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
90
48
257


Example 394
91
8.5
3.5
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
80
44
234


Example 395
95
9.2
4.1
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
70
39
211



















TABLE 31









Coated













Coating part
Soft
particle
Dust core




















Thickness

magnetic
Coating

Withstand



Rz
Ra

T

metal
ratio
Strength
voltage



(nm)
(nm)
Rz/T
(nm)
Material
Structure
(%)
(MPa)
(V/mm)




















Example 396
95
8.9
3.7
26
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
90
47
255


Example 397
97
9.3
4.2
23
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
80
43
229


Example 398
93
8.7
3.7
25
P2O5—ZnO—R2O—Al2O3
Nanocrystal
70
38
208









From Table 30, in addition to a case where the surface roughness was within the above-described range, in a case where the coating ratio of the coated particle was within the above-described range, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were compatible at a high level.


Moreover, from Table 31, in addition to a case where the line roughness was within the above-described range, in a case where the coating ratio of the coated particle was within the above-described range, it could be confirmed that both the strength and the withstand voltage property of the dust core were compatible with each other at a high level.

Claims
  • 1. A soft magnetic metal powder comprising a plurality of soft magnetic metal particles containing iron, wherein a surface of each of the soft magnetic metal particles is covered with a coating part, anda maximum height Sz of a surface of the coating part is 10 to 700 nm.
  • 2. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 1, wherein an arithmetical mean height Sa of the surface of the coating part is 3 to 50 nm.
  • 3. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 1, wherein Sz/T is 1.5 to 30, in which a thickness of the coating part is set as T [nm].
  • 4. A soft magnetic metal powder comprising a plurality of soft magnetic metal particles containing iron, wherein a surface of each of the soft magnetic metal particles is covered with a coating part, anda maximum height Rz of a surface of the coating part is 10 to 700 nm.
  • 5. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 4, wherein an arithmetical mean height Ra of the surface of the coating part is 3 to 100 nm.
  • 6. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 4, wherein Rz/T is 1.5 to 30, in which a thickness of the coating part is set as T [nm].
  • 7. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 1, wherein T is 3 to 200 nm, in which a thickness of the coating part is set as T [nm].
  • 8. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 4, wherein T is 3 to 200 nm, in which a thickness of the coating part is set as T [nm].
  • 9. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 1, wherein the coating part contains at least one selected from the group consisting of phosphorus, aluminum, calcium, barium, bismuth, silicon, chromium, sodium, zinc, and oxygen.
  • 10. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 4, wherein the coating part contains at least one selected from the group consisting of phosphorus, aluminum, calcium, barium, bismuth, silicon, chromium, sodium, zinc, and oxygen.
  • 11. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 1, wherein the soft magnetic metal particles are constituted by an amorphous alloy.
  • 12. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 4, wherein the soft magnetic metal particles are constituted by an amorphous alloy.
  • 13. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 1, wherein the soft magnetic metal particles are constituted by a nanocrystalline alloy.
  • 14. The soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 4, wherein the soft magnetic metal particles are constituted by a nanocrystalline alloy.
  • 15. A dust core containing: the soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 1.
  • 16. A dust core containing: the soft magnetic metal powder according to claim 4.
  • 17. A magnetic component comprising: the dust core according to claim 15.
  • 18. A magnetic component comprising: the dust core according to claim 16.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
2019-180943 Sep 2019 JP national
2020-129377 Jul 2020 JP national
US Referenced Citations (3)
Number Name Date Kind
20180025822 Yonezawa Jan 2018 A1
20190156975 Urata May 2019 A1
20190279796 Hosono et al. Sep 2019 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (6)
Number Date Country
2007-92120 Apr 2007 JP
2010-138439 Jun 2010 JP
2015-132010 Jul 2015 JP
2019-157187 Sep 2019 JP
2020-155669 Sep 2020 JP
2020-155674 Sep 2020 JP
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210098164 A1 Apr 2021 US