Endoscopic surgery within the head is a common procedure in neurological surgery and otolaryngology. Advantages to endoscopic surgery of the head include avoiding large cranial incisions and brain retraction. Endoscopic, surgery of the head can provide the surgeon with a better view because the camera of the endoscope is brought directly to the surgical site.
During this type of surgery using a trans-orbital approach, there tends to be some local trauma to the orbital and peri-orbital tissue. This surgical pathway trauma can add to the trauma of the procedure and prolong the patient's recovery time. In addition, there is frequent and persistent “run down” of blood and soiled irrigation fluid that obscures the view of the endoscope. This leads to the constant need for irrigation and suction of these liquids, as well as removal, cleaning and replacement of the endoscope. This can occur many times during a single procedure, making the cleaning and clearing of the endoscope time consuming.
Accessing the surgical site through any route, but especially through the trans-orbital route, may require the surgeon to travel around or through internal tissue structures within the head, often using multiple instruments. When an instrument needs to be substituted, or an endoscope needs to be cleaned, the surrounding tissues are again put at risk as the instruments are removed and reinserted.
Therefore, there is a need to reduce or eliminate these problems encountered in endoscopic trans-orbital surgery.
A surgical shield protects collateral soft tissue from damage during an intra-orbital surgical procedure in the head of a patient. The shield may be provided as an elongated flexible sheath. The shield may have one or more thin flexible sidewalls that can conform to the tissue around or bearing on the shield. Other areas or sidewalls of the shield may be thicker to better resist perforation by surgical instruments, and/or to better maintain the access lumen of pathway to the surgical site.
Other features and advantages will become apparent from the following detailed description of examples of how the invention may be designed and used. The invention resides as well in sub-combinations of the elements and method steps described.
In the drawings, the same element number indicates the same element in each of the views:
Turning now to the drawings, as shown in
The flare or conical shape of the proximal end 30 of the shield 20 allows for easy insertion and re-insertion of instruments/endoscopes through the main channel 40 leading to the surgical site 28. The inside surfaces 42 of the shield 20 are smooth to allow surgical instruments to slide easily through the main channel 40 and avoid piercing the shield and the collateral soft tissue with the instruments. The inside surfaces 42 may be coated with a low friction coating such as hyaluronan, or glycerin. This makes the inner surface a low friction surface to assist in easier insertion of instruments into the shield 18
As shown in
The wall thicknesses may also be selected, at least in part, based on the anticipated resistance to puncture needed for specific applications. In some procedures for example, the distal ends of the instruments passed through the main channel 40 of the shield 20 may tend to contact only the inner wall, and not the outer wall, due to the position of the shield and the patient's head, as well as the size and shape of the instruments. In a shield 20 for use in this type of application, the inner wall 114 may be substantially thicker than the outer wall 112.
The shield 20 may also be shaped based on the intended surgical approach. For example, as shown in
The pressure sensors 74 may be used in other applications to measure pressure on other tissue or structures, such as the orbit or the brain. The orientation of the shield may be adjusted so that an array of pressure sensors is positioned up against the structure of interest. Using real-time feedback from the pressure sensors, the surgeon can adjust the degree of retraction, or make other changes, to minimize tissue injury.
Turning now to
The channels themselves may act as catheters, when connected directly to a suction or irrigation device. As shown in
In some designs, one or more channels 80 may stop short of the distal end of the shield, and have spaced apart openings that may be used to continuously or intermittently rinse and/or evacuate the main channel 40. LEDs or other lighting elements may also be provided to the inside of the shield. If the shield is made of a transparent or translucent material, the tissues surrounding the shield may also be illuminated by the lighting elements. It is also possible to position lighting elements to direct light outwardly from the external surfaces of the shield walls, rather than internally
The channels 80 may be radially spaced apart around the circumference of the shield, so that regardless of the orientation of the shield, there will always be channels that are the top and bottom of the shield with respect to gravity. For example, an irrigation portal may be located at the top portal for a given orientation, with a gravity-dependent channel located at the bottom, or 180 degrees opposite, used for suction. Multiple fluid channels may be used in combination simultaneously.
As Shown in
The organization of the array of tubes and/or wires may position the suction/irrigation channels based on the orientation of be shield with respect to gravity. As shown in
As shown in
Referring now to
In some designs, the shield may automatically expand or unfurl from the rolled up or compressed position into a fully deployed position, via a natural spring force of the shield material. The surgeon may assist in the deployment, if necessary, by selectively pushing on the shield using a surgical tool.
The shields may be provided in varying lengths and diameters, with the surgeon selecting a specific size based on the specific anatomy of the patient, or other factors. The shields may also be used in methods where they are cut to a desired length by the surgeon, prior to placement. Scale markings may be printed or molded onto the shields to assist the surgeon in cutting the shield to the desired size. In some cases, it may also be useful to out the conical end 30 to a desired length and/or shape, before or after the shield placed. The diameter of proximal end of the shield may be made large enough so that a surgeon may feed instruments into the shield while watching the endoscope display. For this purpose, the diameter of the proximal end may be 2, 3, or 4 inches in diameter.
The shields may include radio opaque material, in the form of one or more strips, wires, dots, or other shapes of metal material. A radiolucent strip embedded in the walls of the shield allows for confirmation of placement with fluoroscopy, and it also may be registered and integrated with surgical navigation. Multiple strips may make registration and/or orientation more convenient. The strip could be embedded in any wall of the shield.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the invention provides surgical shields that protect collateral soft tissue from damage during a surgical procedures, and also define and maintain the access pathway to the surgical site. The shields may incorporate many different functions to assist in the surgery including irrigation, suction, and light projection.
Thus, various designs and methods have been shown and described. Many changes and substitutions can of course be made within the spirit and scope of the invention. The invention, therefore, should not be limited, except by the following claims and their equivalents.
This Application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/596,996 filed Feb. 9, 2012. This Application is also a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/943,779 filed on Nov. 10, 2010, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Nos. 61/261,310, filed Nov. 14, 2009; 61/293,932, filed Jan. 11, 2010; and 61/346,476, filed May 20, 2010, each incorporated herein by reference. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/369,952 filed on Feb. 9, 2012 is also incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3568678 | Pourquier et al. | Mar 1971 | A |
3664330 | Deutsch | May 1972 | A |
3867946 | Huddy | Feb 1975 | A |
4280493 | Council | Jul 1981 | A |
4312353 | Shahbabian | Jan 1982 | A |
4755174 | Milewski et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4819619 | Augustine et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4821715 | Downing | Apr 1989 | A |
4883465 | Brennan | Nov 1989 | A |
4993406 | Reynolds | Feb 1991 | A |
5011474 | Brennan | Apr 1991 | A |
5139510 | Goldsmith et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5336163 | DeMane et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5400770 | Nakao et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5599284 | Shea | Feb 1997 | A |
5601591 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5601594 | Best | Feb 1997 | A |
5713839 | Shea | Feb 1998 | A |
5800394 | Yoon et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5827224 | Shippert | Oct 1998 | A |
5865728 | Moll et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5967970 | Cowan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6033426 | Kaji | Mar 2000 | A |
6083155 | Trese | Jul 2000 | A |
6102928 | Bonutti | Aug 2000 | A |
6183493 | Zammit | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6306084 | Pinczower | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309345 | Stelzer et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6328753 | Zammit | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6454783 | Piskun | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6607546 | Murken | Aug 2003 | B1 |
7100612 | Dunlap | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7361168 | Makower et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7410480 | Muni et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7520876 | Ressemann et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7654997 | Makower et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7678099 | Ressemann et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7720521 | Chang et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727186 | Makower et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7730888 | Dunlap | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7740642 | Becker | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7753929 | Becker | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7753930 | Becker | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7771409 | Chang et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7799337 | Levin | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7918871 | Truitt et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8409083 | Mangiardi | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20020013511 | Ailinger et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20030014076 | Mollenauer et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030154986 | Fariss et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040138525 | Saadat et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040210114 | Simon | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040230100 | Shluzas | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243172 | Hogle | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050059960 | Simaan et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050075540 | Shluzas et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050165366 | Brustad et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050240147 | Makower et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060004323 | Chang et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060173407 | Shaughnessy et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060200003 | Youssef | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060287583 | Mangiardi | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070005094 | Eaton et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070016174 | Millman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070021773 | Nolte | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070100370 | Hogle | May 2007 | A1 |
20070191876 | Dubrul et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203474 | Ryan et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219575 | Mejia | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070225568 | Colleran | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070277831 | Luhrs | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070293726 | Goldfarb et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070299314 | Bertolero et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080027464 | Moll et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080045803 | Williams et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080058590 | Saadat et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065105 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080065108 | Diolaiti | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071288 | Larkin et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080097514 | Chang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080097516 | Chang et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109026 | Kassam | May 2008 | A1 |
20080132938 | Chang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080188868 | Weitzner et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080234550 | Hawkes et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080234720 | Chang et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080243064 | Stahler et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255519 | Piskun et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080260732 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080275483 | Makower et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090010991 | Prabhu et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090054728 | Trusty | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090062927 | Marten et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090137952 | Ramanurthy et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090312745 | Goldfarb et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100030031 | Goldfarb et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100076555 | Marten et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100100181 | Makower et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145147 | Pinsky et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174149 | Moll et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100174308 | Chang et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100179537 | Rashidi | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100211181 | Prabhu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100211186 | Senders et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100228227 | Krespi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100249523 | Spiegal et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100298862 | Chang et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100331777 | Danielsson | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110004194 | Eaton et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110118551 | Ciporen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110125092 | Hepworth et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20120149990 | Buehler et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130092173 | Alexander et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
O'Brien et al. “Transorbital Approach for Occluding the Middle Cerebral Artery Without Craniectomy”, Stroke. vol. 4, Mar.-Apr. 1973. pp. 201-206. |
Cockerham et al. “Surgery for Orbital Tumors. Part II: Transorbital Approaches”, Neurosurg Focus. 2001; 10(5). |
Ciporen et al. “Multiportal Endoscopic Approaches to the Central Skull Base: A Cadaveric Study”, World Neurosurgery. 73(6), Jun. 2010, pp. 705-712. |
Moe et al. “Transorbital Neuroendoscopic Surgery”, Neurosurgery. Sep. 2010; 67(3 Suppl Operative), pp. 16-28. |
International Search Report dated Jul. 28, 2011 in PCT Application No. WO11/060125 A3. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130204092 A1 | Aug 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61596996 | Feb 2012 | US | |
61261310 | Nov 2009 | US | |
61293932 | Jan 2010 | US | |
61346476 | May 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12943779 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 13760971 | US |