To support increases in the capacity of magnetic disk drives, magnetic recording media that are capable of recording data in higher planar densities are needed. While a high planar recording density is generally not achievable with some types of magnetic recording systems, perpendicular recording systems may provide such improvement
Perpendicular recording systems record bits formed by a magnetic field in a direction that is perpendicular to the plane of a perpendicular magnetic recording medium having perpendicular magnetizing anisotropy, with adjacent bits being magnetized in the anti-parallel direction. The magnetic moments of adjacent bits stabilize each other, which allows an increase in coercive force and therefore contributes to high-density recording.
A conventional perpendicular magnetic recording medium is made up of a thick soft magnetic film (i.e., a soft underlayer) having a high permeability and a perpendicular recording layer having a high perpendicular anisotropy, typically separated by a spacer layer. One problem with the highly permeable, thick soft underlayer is that it is susceptible to the formation of domain walls, which produce noise at the time of recording and therefore adversely affects reproduction of data from the medium. The noise degrades the quality of readback data. Another problem is manufacturing cost. Typically, the soft underlayer material is applied to the substrate by a low-rate sputtering process. Because of the thickness of the material, the sputtering process can be time-consuming and therefore can be quite costly.
In general, in one aspect, the invention is directed to a magnetic recording medium, such as a perpendicular or longitudinal medium, for use in a magnetic recording system. The recording medium includes a soft underlayer structure having a first soft underlayer and a second soft underlayer. The first soft underlayer is disposed on a substrate of the recording medium. The first soft underlayer and the second soft underlayer have respective first and second magnetization saturation values, the second magnetization value being substantially greater than the first magnetization saturation value. The recording medium also includes an exchange isolation layer disposed on the second soft underlayer and a recording storage layer disposed on the exchange isolation layer.
Embodiments of the invention may include one or more of the following features. The first soft underlayer may have a first thickness and the second soft underlayer may have a second thickness, the first thickness being chosen to be greater than the second thickness. The first thickness may be in a range of 0.05 to 5 microns and the second thickness may be less than 100 nm. The first and second soft underlayers may be separated by a radial exchange pinning layer disposed on an exchange isolation layer.
The second soft underlayer may comprise a material of low permeability. The material can be an iron alloy, for example, FeTaC, FeCo, FeTaN, FeAlSi, FeN, FeB, or FeCoB, or a material such as CoZrNb. The first soft underlayer may comprise a material of high permeability. The material can be, for example, Permalloy, NiP or NiFeMo. The first 20 soft underlayer material can be applied to the substrate by a plating process or, alternatively, a sputtering process. The first magnetization saturation value can be less than 10,000 gauss and the second magnetization saturation value can be greater than 14,000 gauss.
In another aspect, the invention is directed to a disk drive system that includes a magnetic disk and a magnetic read/write device to write information on the disk and read the information from the magnetic disk. The magnetic disk includes a multi-layered structure. The multi-layered structure includes a soft underlayer structure having a first soft underlayer and a soft second underlayer. The first soft underlayer is disposed on a substrate of the magnetic disk. The first soft underlayer and the second soft underlayer have respective first and second magnetization saturation values. The second magnetization value is substantially greater than the first magnetization saturation value. The multi-layered structure further includes an exchange isolation layer disposed on the second soft underlayer and a recording storage layer disposed on the exchange isolation layer. The recording storage layer may include a perpendicular recording medium and/or a longitudinal recording medium.
Particular implementations of the invention may provide one or more of the following advantages. By replacing the single soft underlayer of conventional perpendicular recording media with multiple soft underlayers, various improvements that generally could not be realized with the single soft underlayer can be realized. That is, the second soft underlayer can be implemented for high magnetization saturation (Bsat), low permeability, and low susceptibility to achieve a fast readback response and noise reduction (through the reduction of domain walls) in the readback signals. The first soft underlayer, in contrast, can be implemented to provide low Bsat, with high permeability and high susceptibility for a low reluctance flux path. In addition, by splitting the structure into two separate layers, a thinner, high magnetization saturation (Bsat) layer and a thicker low Bsat layer, the cost of manufacturing the thicker layer can be reduced. That is, the thicker layer can be formed using plating or high-rate sputtering techniques, as opposed to the low-rate sputtering used by the conventional, single high Bsat soft underlayer.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following detailed description and from the claims.
Referring to
In general, the use of a SUL in perpendicular recording media serves three main objectives. First, the SUL causes the flux from the write head to be substantially perpendicular to the media plane. Second, the SUL increases the readback signal amplitude. Third, the SUL provides an easy, low reluctance path for returning the flux to the return write pole.
Realization of these objectives results in different, and to some extent, competing, optimizations. For instance, to satisfy the first objective, it is desirable to have a high magnetization saturation (“Bsat”) value and radial magnetic orientation. This achieves fast grain switching in the soft underlayer so that high local fields at the head output are possible. In achieving the second objective, it is desirable to have radially oriented soft magnetic properties to generate a readback signal that is both large and quiet. With the formation of domain walls, the SUL becomes a source of noise during a readback operation. The readback signal amplitude is frequency dependent and typically larger at low frequencies. The larger the amplitude is, the greater the noise component is. To reduce readback signal noise, low susceptibility is favored. With respect to the third objective, providing the return flux path favors low conductance materials (to reduce eddy currents) and high flux carrying capacity, which requires high susceptibility such that the reluctance between the write pole and the return write pole is reduced. Reduction of this reluctance increases the write field amplitude for a given head current (magnetomotive force).
As noted earlier, a conventional SUL, such as SUL 24, is required to be thick and have a high value of Bsat. Because a high Bsat material is difficult to deposit, the material is applied to the substrate 25 by a low-rate sputtering process. For a thick material, the sputtering process can be quite time consuming and therefore drive up the overall manufacturing cost of the media.
The different soft underlayer optimizations discussed above, as well as an optimization that allows for a more inexpensive manufacturing process, can all be achieved by replacing the soft underlayer 24 of
Referring to
Because a low Bsat material is used in the thick first soft underlayer 32, that layer can be manufactured inexpensively through the use of such techniques as plating or high-rate sputtering. For example, a plated NiP with 6At % phosphorous would result in a soft plated layer with a coercivity in the range of 2-20 Oe.
As mentioned earlier, the second soft under layer 38 has a high Bsat. A high Bsat means that the second soft underlayer can allow large perpendicular write fields and write field gradients. Low permeability is induced in this layer either by exchange coupling to the radial exchange pinning layer 36 or by radial anisotropy. Low permeability improves the frequency response of a head readback signal and reduces the sensitivity of a recording system that employs the medium 30 to media DC erase regions and stray fields.
There is a relationship between the magnetization magnitude (“Bmag”) for the strength of the magnetic field coming from the head and SUL thickness which can be used to select appropriate thicknesses for the two soft underlayers.
Referring back to
The frequency content of these four cases can be examined with reference to
Given the above considerations, example materials that may be used for layers 32, 34, 36 and 38 are provided in TABLE 1 below.
Other embodiments are within the scope of the following claims. For example, the invention is not limited to use with perpendicular recording systems. Longitudinal recording systems record information in a direction that is longitudinal to the plane of the recording medium. Longitudinal media with soft underlayers may also be used in the manner described herein, in addition to, or instead of, perpendicular recording media.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/345,126, filed Nov. 9, 2001, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5270291 | Sun et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5363794 | Lairson et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5543221 | Kitakami et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5603766 | Visokay et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5822153 | Lairson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5834085 | Lairson et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5909340 | Lairson et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5942342 | Hikosaka et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6686070 | Futamoto et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
20020037439 | Litvinov et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020127433 | Shimizu et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020160230 | Yoshikawa et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030035973 | Trindade et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
61-026927 | Feb 1986 | JP |
10-228620 | Aug 1998 | JP |
P2001-155322 | Jun 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60345126 | Nov 2001 | US |