Soil moisture sensor

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 9326462
  • Patent Number
    9,326,462
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, March 10, 2015
    9 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 3, 2016
    8 years ago
Abstract
In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to a soil moisture sensor for interrupting an irrigation schedule of an irrigation controller. The moisture sensor comprises a relatively flat body with two lower electrodes and two lower anchoring barbs. A receiver receives moisture readings from the sensor and compares moisture data to a predetermined moisture interrupt value or limit, over which irrigation is interrupted.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Most common types of environmental monitoring and control for irrigation systems incorporate a means of controlling the start time and duration of watering cycles via a central timing controller. The need to adjust a watering cycle due to the environmental influence is necessary in order to save natural resources, reduce costs, and to improve the growing environment for plants. Such environmental conditions include temperature changes, relative humidity, precipitation, wind and cloud cover.


In conventional control system, the primary means for halting an automatic watering cycle when certain environmental event occurs is by an operator manually suspending the cycle at the irrigation controller. In most situations this proves to be an ineffective means of conserving resources due to the inconsistent and inefficient methods followed by the operator. In fact, quite often the operator ignores the need to suspend the watering cycle altogether, and in some cases neglects to resume the watering cycle when required, leading to both over-watered and under-watered landscaping.


It is because of this unreliable and inconvenient manual method that environmental sensors were developed that allow for an automatic interruption of the controller due to an environmental condition. One of the major drawbacks of the conventional environmental sensors is the extensive installation time and difficult methods required for a proper installation.


A soil moisture sensor is usually installed in the ground by boring of a precisely sized hole, placing the sensor at the appropriate depth to measure the soil properties in the root zone, placing a slurry of water and soil in the hole to assure that the sensor has good contact with the soil and try to restore the soil in the hole to its previous condition as much as possible so that the sensor provides readings that correctly reflect the state of the soil. If the soil is not restored properly, water and fertilizer can drain down along the hole to the sensor and corrupt the sensor readings.


It is common for soil to be stratified into regions of varying textures, composition and drainage properties. Digging a hole and refilling it with slurry disrupts these strata around the sensor and decreases the accuracy of the sensor readings.


As the soil cycles from wet to dry, the soil may shrink back from the sensor and loose contact. If this happens, the sensor can no longer read the soil status properly. Sometimes, rewetting the soil is not sufficient to restore the sensor contact and the sensor must be reinstalled.


The wires that run from the sensors up through the soil to the surface are then routed either to a central controller directly or to a central controller through a wireless transmission system. This method is burdensome in time, tools required and is prone to unsuccessful installation through poor seating of the sensor in the soil, poor representation of the target soil by the sensed soil that was disturbed by installation, and electrical noise in connecting wires. The central controller receives the signals from the remote sensors and determines whether or not to start the next irrigation cycle for a particular irrigation zone.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In one embodiment, the present invention is directed to a soil moisture sensor for interrupting an irrigation schedule of an irrigation controller. The moisture sensor comprises a relatively flat body with two lower electrodes and two lower anchoring barbs. A receiver receives moisture readings from the sensor and compares moisture data to predetermined moisture interrupt value or limit, over which irrigation is interrupted.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

These and other aspects, features and advantages of which embodiments of the invention are capable of will be apparent and elucidated from the following description of embodiments of the present invention, reference being made to the accompanying drawings, in which



FIG. 1 illustrates a perspective view of a moisture sensor according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 2 illustrates a top view of the sensor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 3 illustrates a side view of the sensor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 4 illustrates a front view of the sensor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 5 illustrates a bottom view of the sensor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 6 illustrates a perspective bottom view of the sensor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 7 illustrates another perspective bottom view of the sensor of FIG. 1.



FIG. 8 illustrates a top view of the sensor of FIG. 1 without a top housing portion.



FIG. 9 illustrates a top view of the sensor of FIG. 1 without a top housing portion.



FIG. 10 illustrates a front view of a receiver according to an embodiment of the present invention.



FIG. 11 illustrates a view of an interface of the receiver of FIG. 10.





DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

Specific embodiments of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. This invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art. The terminology used in the detailed description of the embodiments illustrated in the accompanying drawings is not intended to be limiting of the invention. In the drawings, like numbers refer to like elements.



FIGS. 1-9 illustrate various views of a wireless soil moisture sensor 100 that communicates with a receiver unit 150, shown in FIG. 10 (also referred to as a soil moisture sensor interface). The moisture sensor 100 measures soil moisture, salinity, and temperature values of a region of soil at its ground location and periodically transmits these values to the receiver unit 150. When the measured moisture value rises above a predetermined interrupt value or the measured value of temperature falls below a predetermined value or threshold, the receiver unit 150 interrupts irrigation controlled by an irrigation controller (to which the receiver unit 150 is connected). When the measured moisture value falls below a second predetermined value, a visual alert can be generated by the receiver 150 to alert the user to dry turf conditions. In this respect, the sensor 100 and receiver unit 150 can regulate irrigation based on soil measurements such as a moisture level. For example, if the current moisture value of the soil remains below the interruption threshold for more than three days or the current moisture value drops below 50% of the interruption threshold, an audio and/or visual alert on the receiver 150 is activated.


As best seen in FIGS. 1-4, the moisture sensor 100 includes a top housing portion 102 that is located on the “top” of the sensor 100 and is generally exposed from the nearby turf after installation. While the housing portion 102 is illustrated with a generally rectangular shape, square, circular, or any other shape configurations are also possible.


As best seen in FIGS. 1 and 3-7, the sensor 100 includes two electrodes 106 and two anchoring members or stakes 104 that protrude from the underside of the sensor 100 (i.e., the side opposite of the top housing portion 102). The electrodes 106 are preferably comprised of a conductive material, such as metal, on their exposed surface 106A.


The electrodes 106 further comprise an upper support portion 108 that encloses an upper length of the conductive portion 106A. The support portion 108 includes two barbed front fins 108A, two side fins 108C, a middle fin 108D, and two back fins 108B which support and anchor the electrodes 106 into soil. Preferably, the back fins 108B and the side fins 108C are angled relative to the surfaces of the underside of the sensor 100 and have relatively sharp or angled edges to enhance penetrating into soil.


The two back stakes 104 each include two angled side fins 104C, two angled front fins 104B and two barbed back fins 104A. Again, these fins preferably have a relatively sharp or angled edge to enhance penetrating into soil. Since the body of the sensor 100 has a generally flat shape, the electrodes 106 help anchor the front of the sensor 100 while the back stakes 104 help anchor the back. In this respect, the sensor 100 can maintain a relatively low profile in the turf to minimize damage from ground keeping equipment and reduce tripping or other type of injuries to pedestrians.


As best seen in FIG. 5-7, the back stakes 104 are located on a removable bottom plate 110 that is fastened via several screws 112. Removal of this plate 110 allows a user to access a battery compartment.



FIGS. 8 and 9 illustrate two perspective views of the sensor 100 without its top housing portion 102. The interior of the sensor 100 includes a battery compartment containing batteries 120 and sealed with o-ring 122. Adjacent to the battery compartment is a PCB compartment that contains a printed circuit board 116 including a microcontroller, memory, transmitter, sensor chips, status L.E.D. 114, and antenna 118.


Top portions 106B of the electrodes 106 extend through the circuit board 116, thereby allowing the sensor measurement circuits to connect to and make measurements. The antenna 118 also connects upward from the circuit board 116 and then bends at about a 90 degree angle such that much of the antenna 116 extends in a parallel orientation relative to the sensor's length. In other words, the antenna 118 is positioned horizontally over much of the circuit board 116 and the batteries 120. Preferably, the antenna 118 is composed of a conductive material and therefore allows the circuit board 116 to transmit and receive wireless signals via the antenna.


The L.E.D. 114 is preferably capable of illuminating in multiple colors and is positioned such that it is exposed through the top housing portion 102 (e.g., through a sealed aperture or a small window). In this regard, the sensor 100 can communicate basic signals to a user by illuminating the L.E.D. 114, changing its color or blinking in a pattern.


Turning to FIG. 10, the receiver 150 includes a body 152 having a user interface, an antenna 154 for transmitting with the sensor 100, and a pivoting cover 168 for protecting the user interface from damage. Preferably, the user interface includes an LCD display 156 that can display a number of menus, data, status messages, and other similar information. The LCD display 156 is preferably manipulated by a user by the menu button 160 and plus/minus buttons 158.


A bypass button 162 allows a user to halt the irrigation interruption activity of the receiver 150 and preferably illuminates an indicator light 164 when in its bypass mode. An interruption indicator 166 preferably include one or more indicator lights for indicating when the irrigation schedule is being interrupted (e.g., a red light) or allowed to water (e.g., a green light).


The receiver 150 includes an irrigation interruption mechanism that preferably connects to a sensor port on an irrigation controller or is connected in series to the “common wire” of an irrigation system. In either connection scenario, the irrigation interruption mechanism of the receiver 150 can cause an interruption of scheduled irrigation. In another embodiment, the irrigation interruption mechanism and receiver 150 can be added to a controller via a removable module or can be non-removably integrated into the controller itself.


Once a receiver 150 and a sensor 100 initially wirelessly “pair” together, the display 156 alternates between a signal reception strength display (the top portion of FIG. 11) and a battery strength display (bottom portion of FIG. 11). The signal reception display preferably includes a plurality of bars representing a percentage strength of the signal reception and a numeric value of the signal strength to the sensor 100. Similarly, the battery strength display includes a plurality of bars representing a percentage strength of the battery and a numeric battery volt value of the battery in the sensor 100.


Once the receiver 150 and the sensor 100 have been paired, the user can install the sensor into the turf. To assist the user in finding an installation location with desirable wireless signal strength between the sensor 100 and receiver 150, the two devices can enter a wireless placement mode in which the L.E.D. 114 changes colors to represent the existing signal strength. For example, when the L.E.D. 114 illuminates green, the signal strength is strong/excellent, if the L.E.D. 114 illuminates yellow, the signal strength is medium/marginal, if the L.E.D. 114 illuminates red, the signal strength is very weak and if the L.E.D. 114 illuminates a flashing red light, no signal is detected by the sensor 100. In this respect, the user can walk freely around the turf while being aware of the general quality of the signal strength between the sensor 100 and the receiver 150.


The sensor 100 is preferably installed into a desired area of turf by applying equal pressure on the top of the top housing portion 102 until both the electrodes 106 and back stakes 104 are fully inserted into the soil.


The sensor 100 and receiver 150 can also calibrate themselves to the condition of the surrounding turf with a programmed calibration mode or software routine. More specifically, the maximum soil moisture content, or field capacity, can be determined by thoroughly soaking an area of at least 6 feet around the sensor 100. The sensor 100 periodically measures the decrease in the water level over a predetermined period of time, such as 24 hours, and thereby determines the maximum soil moisture content. In one embodiment, the sensor 100 monitors for a peak soil moisture level within 24 hours of its first power on by a user and uses this value as a maximum soil moisture content. In another embodiment, the soil moisture sensor determines maximum soil moisture content of the soil moisture value at about six hours after the peak soil moisture value measured by the soil sensor 100.


During normal operation, the sensor 100 periodically transmits moisture measurement data and temperature measurement data (and optionally salinity data), to the receiver 150. The receiver compares the current moisture reading to a predetermined interrupt value (i.e., a limit or threshold value) and interrupts irrigation if the predetermined value is exceeded. Preferably, the predetermined value is a percentage of the maximum soil moisture content of the soil (e.g., field capacity); however, a variety of different predetermined value types can be used. For example, if the current moisture value is greater than or equal to 75% of the maximum soil moisture capacity, the receiver 150 will interrupt the watering schedule of the irrigation controller. Preferably, the receiver 150 provides an interface menu for allowing a user to adjust this irrigation interrupt value (e.g., via menu button 160 and plus/minus buttons 158).


Preferably, the receiver 150 and its interruption mechanism interrupts irrigation based on a moisture measurement performed after a predetermined amount of time since the last irrigation cycle (e.g., between 1-24 hours). In other words, when the receiver 150 and sensor 100 determine that an irrigation event has occurred, it will delay any possible irrigation interruption for a predetermined period of time. This behavior allows the receiver 150 to compare a more accurate soil sensor reading against the predetermined irrigation interruption value. To assist in determining when irrigation has occurred, the receiver 150 monitors for when the maximum soil moisture content has been reached from measurement data transmitted from the sensor 100 (i.e., when the soil has become completely soaked from irrigation). Based on this moisture value, the receiver 150 determines that an irrigation cycle has occurred and then delays irrigation interruption for a predetermined period of time. Preferably, the delay for normal interruption operations is user programmable (e.g., between 1 and 24 hours).


Alternately, the receiver 150 may determine the occurrence of an irrigation event by sensing current passing through the common wire to which it is connected. In this regard, the receiver 150 may use the preset delay to begin comparing current moisture readings after completion of an irrigation schedule, thereby measuring a more accurate and representative moisture reading.


The receiver 150 also includes a user adjustable temperature limit or value that triggers the receiver 150 to interrupt irrigation based on a temperature measurement received from a temperature sensor in the sensor 100 or alternately in the receiver 150.


As previously discussed, the receiver 150 includes a bypass button 162 that, when pressed, halts any irrigation interruption caused by the receiver 150. Once activated, a default bypass duration time is displayed on the display 156 (e.g., 24 hours). The user can adjust this bypass time with the plus/minus buttons 158. After this bypass time has expired, the receiver 150 returns to its normal operating mode in which it can selectively interrupt the irrigation schedule.


Preferably, the receiver 150 may include a plurality of alerts or alarms that activate a flashing light or audible signal on the receiver 150. In one example, an alert will trigger if the current moisture measurement remains below the preset irrigation interruption value for more than a predetermined amount of time (e.g., 3 days). In another example, an alert will trigger if the current moisture measurement falls to a low value, such as about half of the preset irrigation interruption value.


In one embodiment, the receiver 150 can communicate with both a soil moisture sensor 100 and a wireless rain sensor (not shown). The interface of the receiver 150 may include separate displays and settings for the rain sensor so as to allow either the soil sensor 100 or the rain sensor to interrupt irrigation directed by the irrigation controller. Hence, a user only needs a single receiver as opposed to two separate receivers.


While the embodiments of the soil sensing system of the present invention have been generally described as interrupting irrigation when a moisture threshold has been achieved, it should be understood that the soil sensor and receiver can alternately transmit adjustment commands to an irrigation controller to increase or decrease the length of irrigation cycles based on a moisture level of the soil. The receiver may also simply transmit moisture values to a capable irrigation controller, which can then determine if an irrigation schedule should be increased, decreased or interrupted.


Although the invention has been described in terms of particular embodiments and applications, one of ordinary skill in the art, in light of this teaching, can generate additional embodiments and modifications without departing from the spirit of or exceeding the scope of the claimed invention. Accordingly, it is to be understood that the drawings and descriptions herein are proffered by way of example to facilitate comprehension of the invention and should not be construed to limit the scope thereof.

Claims
  • 1. A soil moisture sensor comprising: a sensor body having a horizontally elongated shape formed from a top surface, bottom surface, and a plurality of sides;a sensor circuit assembly that is horizontally disposed within said sensor body;an antenna coupled to said sensor circuit assembly and oriented horizontally within said sensor body;a sensor probe assembly that is connected at a first end of said sensor body so as to be generally perpendicular to said horizontally elongated shape of said sensor body and to extend from an asymmetrically located position on said bottom surface.
  • 2. The soil moisture sensor of claim 1, further comprising a stake member connected at a second end of said sensor body so as to be generally perpendicular to said horizontally elongated shape of said sensor body, perpendicular to said sensor probe assembly, and symmetrically from said bottom surface relative to a position of said sensor probe assembly.
  • 3. The soil moisture sensor of claim 2, wherein said sensor probe assembly includes a first elongated electrode and a second elongated electrode; each of which is positioned perpendicularly to said horizontally elongated shape of said sensor body.
  • 4. The soil moisture sensor of claim 3, wherein said sensor body has a rectangular shape.
  • 5. The soil moisture sensor of claim 4, wherein said sensor body further comprises a plurality of fins located adjacent to said first elongated electrode and said second elongated electrode.
  • 6. The soil moisture sensor of claim 5, wherein said antenna includes a linear region that extends between said first end and said second end of said sensor body.
  • 7. The soil moisture sensor of claim 6, further comprising a multicolored L.E.D. indicator that changes colors based on a wireless signal strength to a soil moisture receiver.
  • 8. A soil moisture sensor comprising: a sensor enclosure having a rectangular shape;a sensor circuit assembly that is disposed within said sensor enclosure;an antenna coupled to said sensor circuit assembly within said sensor enclosure;a sensor probe assembly that is connected at a first end of said sensor enclosure so as to extend outward from a bottom of said sensor enclosure to form a cantilever arrangement with said sensor enclosure.
  • 9. The soil moisture sensor of claim 8, wherein said antenna has a generally linear shape, extending along a long side of said rectangular shape of said sensor enclosure.
  • 10. The soil moisture sensor of claim 8, wherein said sensor probe assembly includes a first elongated electrode and a second elongated electrode; each of which is positioned perpendicularly to a bottom surface of said rectangular shape of said sensor enclosure.
  • 11. The soil moisture sensor of claim 8, further comprising a stake member connected at a second end of said sensor body so as to be generally perpendicular to said sensor probe assembly.
  • 12. The soil moisture sensor of claim 10, wherein said sensor enclosure further comprises a plurality of fins located adjacent to said first elongated electrode and said second elongated electrode.
  • 13. The soil moisture sensor of claim 8, further comprising a multicolored L.E.D. indicator that changes colors based on a wireless signal strength to a soil moisture receiver.
  • 14. A soil moisture sensor comprising: a sensor enclosure having a generally rectangular shape, including a top surface and a bottom surface, configured to be placed against the ground;a sensor circuit assembly that is disposed within and on a first side of said sensor enclosure;a battery compartment sized to enclose one or more batteries and being located adjacent to said sensor circuit assembly, on a second side of said sensor enclosure;an antenna coupled to said sensor circuit assembly within said sensor enclosure, and extending across said sensor circuit assembly and said battery compartment;a sensor probe assembly that extends from said bottom surface of said sensor enclosure adjacent a first edge of said sensor enclosure, so as to form an L-shape with said sensor enclosure.
  • 15. The soil moisture sensor of claim 14, wherein said antenna has a 90 degree bend near said sensor circuit assembly.
  • 16. The soil moisture sensor of claim 14, wherein said antenna has a generally linear shape, extending along a long side of said sensor enclosure.
  • 17. The soil moisture sensor of claim 14, wherein said sensor probe assembly includes a first elongated electrode and a second elongated electrode; each of which is positioned perpendicularly to a bottom surface of said rectangular shape of said sensor enclosure.
  • 18. The soil moisture sensor of claim 17, further comprising a first stake member and a second stake member connected at a second edge of said sensor body so as to be generally perpendicular to said sensor probe assembly.
  • 19. The soil moisture sensor of claim 18, wherein said sensor enclosure further comprises a plurality of fins located adjacent to said first elongated electrode, said second elongated electrode, said first stake member, and said second stake member.
  • 20. The soil moisture sensor of claim 14, further comprising a multicolored L.E.D. indicator exposed on said top surface of said sensor enclosure that changes colors based on a wireless signal strength to a soil moisture receiver.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/659,726 filed Oct. 24, 2012 entitled Soil Moisture Sensor, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 61/550,817 filed Oct. 24, 2011 entitled Soil Moisture Sensor, both of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

US Referenced Citations (187)
Number Name Date Kind
2688056 Kettering et al. Aug 1954 A
2866379 Veit Dec 1958 A
3372899 McPherson Mar 1968 A
3639770 Zizelmann Feb 1972 A
3751173 Sanz et al. Aug 1973 A
3783804 Platz Jan 1974 A
3787703 Topol Jan 1974 A
3794992 Gehman Feb 1974 A
3808385 Klinefelter Apr 1974 A
3900396 Lamadrid Aug 1975 A
4064507 Schmitz Dec 1977 A
4176395 Evelyn-Veere et al. Nov 1979 A
4184789 Gilde, Jr. Jan 1980 A
4209131 Barash et al. Jun 1980 A
4264902 Miller Apr 1981 A
4274705 Miller Jun 1981 A
4306805 Arrington Dec 1981 A
4313042 Ehrhart Jan 1982 A
4396149 Hirsch Aug 1983 A
4405085 Meyer Sep 1983 A
4422714 Benoit et al. Dec 1983 A
4430646 Enemark Feb 1984 A
4445788 Twersky et al. May 1984 A
4567563 Hirsch Jan 1986 A
4655076 Weihe et al. Apr 1987 A
4674681 Meis et al. Jun 1987 A
4684920 Reiter Aug 1987 A
4693419 Weintraub et al. Sep 1987 A
4726239 Boggess et al. Feb 1988 A
4760547 Duxbury Jul 1988 A
4803470 Fineman Feb 1989 A
4814608 Dempsey et al. Mar 1989 A
4823168 Kamahori et al. Apr 1989 A
4847781 Brown, III et al. Jul 1989 A
4852802 Iggulden Aug 1989 A
4852804 Baier et al. Aug 1989 A
4862701 Small et al. Sep 1989 A
4867379 Hunter Sep 1989 A
4898332 Hunter et al. Feb 1990 A
4916642 Kaiser et al. Apr 1990 A
4922433 Mark May 1990 A
4937732 Brundesini Jun 1990 A
4940974 Sojka Jul 1990 A
4956835 Grover Sep 1990 A
4967961 Hunter Nov 1990 A
4974552 Sickafus Dec 1990 A
5005005 Brossia Apr 1991 A
5058806 Rupar Oct 1991 A
RE33823 Nelson et al. Feb 1992 E
5087886 Mann Feb 1992 A
5101083 Tyler et al. Mar 1992 A
5104045 Kah, Jr. Apr 1992 A
5148990 Kah, Jr. Sep 1992 A
5150622 Vollweiler Sep 1992 A
5209129 Jaselskis et al. May 1993 A
5251153 Nielsen et al. Oct 1993 A
5299742 Han Apr 1994 A
5333785 Dodds Aug 1994 A
5355122 Erickson Oct 1994 A
5385297 Rein et al. Jan 1995 A
5408893 Mcleroy Apr 1995 A
5418466 Watson May 1995 A
5424649 Gluck et al. Jun 1995 A
5442435 Cooper et al. Aug 1995 A
5445178 Feuer Aug 1995 A
5465904 Vaello Nov 1995 A
5471671 Wang et al. Nov 1995 A
5499024 Germanton et al. Mar 1996 A
5526982 McKenzie Jun 1996 A
5598977 Lemme Feb 1997 A
5635710 Reed et al. Jun 1997 A
5667336 Zur Sep 1997 A
5726644 Jednacz et al. Mar 1998 A
5737318 Melnik Apr 1998 A
5740031 Gagnon Apr 1998 A
5740038 Hergert Apr 1998 A
5749521 Lattery May 1998 A
5778332 Chang et al. Jul 1998 A
5813606 Ziff Sep 1998 A
5821864 Knop et al. Oct 1998 A
5836339 Klever Nov 1998 A
5853122 Caprio Dec 1998 A
D407656 Klever Apr 1999 S
5898733 Satyanarayana Apr 1999 A
5909429 Satyanarayana et al. Jun 1999 A
5926101 Dasgupta Jul 1999 A
5978364 Melnik Nov 1999 A
6005517 Friedrichs Dec 1999 A
6016971 Welch Jan 2000 A
6028857 Poor Feb 2000 A
6061440 Delaney et al. May 2000 A
6073427 Nichols Jun 2000 A
6079433 Saarem Jun 2000 A
6088621 Woytowitz et al. Jul 2000 A
6097703 Larsen et al. Aug 2000 A
6126093 Grether et al. Oct 2000 A
6145755 Feltz Nov 2000 A
6195108 Kanno Feb 2001 B1
6208247 Agre et al. Mar 2001 B1
6212388 Seo Apr 2001 B1
6254828 Lacount Jul 2001 B1
6275500 Callaway, Jr. et al. Aug 2001 B1
6283139 Symonds et al. Sep 2001 B1
6298285 Addink et al. Oct 2001 B1
6312191 Rosenfeld Nov 2001 B1
6314340 Mecham et al. Nov 2001 B1
6401530 Roman Jun 2002 B1
6401742 Cramer Jun 2002 B1
6452499 Runge Sep 2002 B1
6453215 Lavoie Sep 2002 B1
6504834 Fifield Jan 2003 B1
6553336 Johnson et al. Apr 2003 B1
6570109 Klinfelter et al. May 2003 B2
6600971 Smith et al. Jul 2003 B1
6601440 Chuang Aug 2003 B1
6634225 Reime Oct 2003 B1
6652188 Albright Nov 2003 B1
6660971 Terada et al. Dec 2003 B2
6665278 Grayson Dec 2003 B2
6685104 Float Feb 2004 B1
6690452 Wilks, Jr. Feb 2004 B2
6705553 Drechsel Mar 2004 B2
6752362 Gretz Jun 2004 B1
6768422 Schofield et al. Jul 2004 B2
6782310 Bailey et al. Aug 2004 B2
6784988 Vijayakumar et al. Aug 2004 B2
6842430 Melnik Jan 2005 B1
6855947 Graves et al. Feb 2005 B2
6892114 Addink et al. May 2005 B1
6895987 Addink et al. May 2005 B2
6907787 Cook et al. Jun 2005 B2
6947132 Boss et al. Sep 2005 B1
6977351 Woytowitz Dec 2005 B1
6997642 Bishop, Jr. Feb 2006 B2
7012394 Moore et al. Mar 2006 B2
7032836 Sesser et al. Apr 2006 B2
7037554 Tao et al. May 2006 B2
7058040 Schmidt Jun 2006 B2
7063270 Bowers et al. Jun 2006 B2
7086608 Perkins Aug 2006 B2
7100842 Meyer et al. Sep 2006 B2
7114376 Loucks Oct 2006 B2
7143957 Nelson Dec 2006 B2
7159795 Sesser et al. Jan 2007 B2
7172366 Bishop, Jr. Feb 2007 B1
7189960 Zimmerman Mar 2007 B2
7191955 Ivans Mar 2007 B2
7240743 Buss et al. Jul 2007 B2
7247837 Zimmerman Jul 2007 B2
7261245 Zur Aug 2007 B2
7264177 Buck et al. Sep 2007 B2
7281439 Schmitt et al. Oct 2007 B2
7286935 Aspola et al. Oct 2007 B2
7339957 Hitt Mar 2008 B2
7413380 Corwon et al. Aug 2008 B2
7719432 Hill May 2010 B1
7788970 Hitt et al. Sep 2010 B2
7789321 Hitt Sep 2010 B2
8302881 Campbell et al. Nov 2012 B1
8660705 Woytowitz et al. Feb 2014 B2
20010033559 Masui Oct 2001 A1
20010049563 Addink et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002425 Dossey Jan 2002 A1
20020029111 Peek Mar 2002 A1
20020100814 Pollak Aug 2002 A1
20020112531 Hubbell Aug 2002 A1
20020123351 Miyoshi Sep 2002 A1
20020139868 Sesser et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020144453 Su Oct 2002 A1
20030037167 Garcia-Luna-Aceves et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030067889 Petite Apr 2003 A1
20030092442 Dalal May 2003 A1
20030114204 Allen et al. Jun 2003 A1
20040030456 Barlow Feb 2004 A1
20040039489 Moore Feb 2004 A1
20040071125 Gross Apr 2004 A1
20040083833 Hitt et al. May 2004 A1
20040100394 Hitt May 2004 A1
20050079831 Ramachandran Apr 2005 A1
20060054214 Caamano Mar 2006 A1
20060127183 Bishop, Jr. Jun 2006 A1
20060178847 Glancy Aug 2006 A1
20070237583 Corwon Oct 2007 A1
20080129495 Hitt Jun 2008 A1
20080255708 Nies et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090177330 Kah, Jr. Jul 2009 A1
20100268392 Korol et al. Oct 2010 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (5)
Number Date Country
0126031 Nov 1984 EP
2247951 Mar 1992 GB
S63294145 Nov 1988 JP
2002168674 Oct 2010 JP
WO2006001734 Jan 2006 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (56)
Entry
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed Nov. 13, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/659,726, 5 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jun. 18, 2014 in U.S. Appl. No. 13/659,726, 9 pages.
WIPO, U.S. International Search Authority, International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jan. 9, 2013 in International Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/061718, 9 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jun. 30, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/207,220, 17 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed May 5, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/186,454, 12 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/634,554, 9 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed Mar. 2, 2011 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/855,615, 10 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Nov. 17, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/855,615, 13 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed Jun. 30, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/220,289, 4 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed May 28, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,017, 14 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed Apr. 28, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/186,454, 9 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed Feb. 23, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,017, 9 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed Feb. 11, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 12/104,937, 11 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jan. 12, 2010 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/220,289, 7 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jun. 30, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/220,289, 7 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed May 12, 2009 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,017, 8 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed Dec. 9, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/220,289, 9 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed Nov. 25, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,017, 10 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed May 7, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,017, 10 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Jan. 24, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/220,289, 6 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Final Office Action mailed Oct. 24, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,017, 6 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance mailed Oct. 16, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/692,518, 8 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed May 9, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/692,518, 8 pages.
Culler, David et al., “Overview of Sensor Networks”, IEEE Computer, Special Issue in Sensor Networks, Aug. 2004, pp. 41-49.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action mailed Apr. 13, 2004 in U.S. Appl. No. 10/693,017, 9 pages.
Chakeres, Ian D. et al., “AODV Routing Protocol Implementation Design”, Proceedings of the International Workshop on Wireless Ad Hoc Networking (WWAN), Tokyo, Japan, Mar. 2004.
Hill, Jason Lester, “System Architecture for Wireless Sensor Networks”, PhD Thesis published at the University of California at Berkeley, 2003, pp. 1-186.
Dukes et al., Residential Irrigation System Rainfall Shutoff Devices, University of Florida IFAS Extension, 7 pages, Aug. 2002.
IEEE, “Wireless Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANS),” IEEE Std 802.15.1(TM)—2002, 2002, 9 pages, IEEE.
Gutierrez et al., “IEEE 802.15.4: Developing Standard for Low-Power Low-Cost Wireless Personal Area Networks”, IEEE Network, Sep. 1, 2001, 8 pages, IEEE.
E-mail of Feb. 27, 2001 from Alicia Rodriguez, Product Manager for Rain Bird's Clemar manufacturing Corp., 2nd largest manufacturer of irrigation products, and rain sensors in the world.
E-mail of Feb. 14, 2001 from Steve Tyler, Buckner, Inc., who is also Patentee of U.S. Pat. No. 5,101,083.
E-mail of Feb. 13, 2001 from Darren Redatzke, Sr., Marketing Manager for Toro, Inc., world's largest manufacturer of irrigation products and rain sensors.
E-mail of Feb. 6, 2001 from “Wally”, Managing Director of Holman Industries, the largest manufacturer or irrigation controllers in Australia.
Trenholm et al., How to Calibrate Your Sprinkler System1, University of Florida IFAS Extension, 4 pages, Jan. 2001.
Hill, Jason et al., “System Architecture Directions for Networked Sensors”, ASPLOS-IX, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Nov. 2000.
Advertising from archive.org for “R&D Engineering Wireless Rain Sensor Products” by R&D Engineering, copyright 2000, rainsensor.com, 2 pages.
“Presenting the Wireless RainSensor for Irrigation systems” brochure by R&D Engineering, copyright 2000, rainsensor.com, 5 pages.
“The Wireless RainSensor for Irrigation Systems” brochure by R&D Engineering, copyright 2000, rainsensor.com, 8 pages.
Maltz, David A., et al., “Experiences Designing and Building a Multi-Hop Wireless Ad Hoc Network Testbed,” Mar. 5, 1999, 22 pages, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J.J. et al., “Wireless Internet Gateways (WINGS),” 1997, 7 pages, University of California at Santa Cruz, Department of Computer Engineering, Santa Cruz, California.
“Application of Fuzzy Logic in an Irrigation Control System”—Zhang et al, Auburn University, IEEE 1996.
Rain Bird, Maxicom Guide to Operations, Chapter 7, Oct. 1994, US.
Rain Bird, Maxicom Central Control System, Irrigation Management Designed to Fit Your Needs Jun. 1994, pp. 2-8, Rain Bird Sales, Inc., US.
Rain Bird, Components of the Maxicom System, Feb. 9, 1994, p. 3.2, Section 3,US.
Rain Bird, Any Time Any Where Any Controller, Central Output Module, 1994, Rain Bird Sales, Inc., 4 pages.
Rain Bird, Maxicom Central Computer Control System, “Landscape Irrigation Products, 1993-1994 Catalog,” pp. 98-99, US.
Brownrigg, E., “User Provided Access to the Internet,” Nov. 30-Dec.2, 1992, Proceedings of The Fifth International Conference on New Information Technology, Hong Kong.
Rain Bird, Maxicom Central Control System Guide to Operations, Table of Contents and pp. 5.4-1-2; 5.4-41-42; 7.2-1-2, Rain Bird Sales, Inc., US.
Daly, J., Ed., “Distribution, Networks, and Networking: Options for Dissemination,” Jun. 9-10, 1992, 7 pages, Workshop on Electronic Texts-Session III Proceedings, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
“An Automated Data Acquisition System for Modeling the Characteristics of a Soil Moisture Sensor”—Posada et al, IEEE, vol. 40, No. 5. Oct. 1991.
Shacham, N., et al., “A Packet Radio Network for Library Automation,” Oct. 19-22, 1987, pp. 456-462, Proceedings of the 1987 IEEE Military Communications Conference. (MILCOM '87), New York: IEEE Press vol. 2.
Lynch, Clifford A. et al., Packet Radio Networks, 1987, 276 pages, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Jubin, John, et al., “The DARPA Packet Radio Network Protocols,” Jan. 1987, pp. 21-34, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 75, No. 1.
Westcott, J.A., “Issues in Distributed Routing for Mobile Packet Radio Networks,” 1982, pp. 233-238, IEEE.
Kahn, R.E., “The Organization of Computer Resources into a Packet Radio Network,” Jan. 1977, pp. 169-178, IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 25, No. 1.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20150181817 A1 Jul 2015 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
61550817 Oct 2011 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 13659726 Oct 2012 US
Child 14643955 US