The present invention relates generally to subsurface supports placed in the ground, and more particularly, to a method and apparatus for creating a soil or rock subsurface support that can be used in multiple ways to include support for excavations as a passive soil nail in tension, bending and/or shear, support to stabilize sloping terrain as a tieback in tension, support for an above ground structure as a micropile in compression and/or shear, or support for an above ground structure as an anchor in tension.
In the construction of buildings, bridges, and other man-made structures, it is well known to place passive supports such as footers, piles, and other subsurface supports for supporting such man-made structures. These types of supports are passive because the earth around the subsurface support must first shift or move to mobilize the available tensile, bending, or shear capacities.
One particular problem associated with subsurface supports which may be made of iron, steel, or other metals is that over time, corrosion takes place which ultimately degrades the ability of the support to provide designed support for an overlying structure.
In addition to providing the above-mentioned subsurface supports, it is also known to provide ground strengthening by driving elongate reinforcing members, referred to as soil nails, into the ground in an array thus improving the bulk properties of the ground. The soil nails themselves are not used for direct support of an overlying structure; rather, the soil nails are simply used to prevent shifting or other undesirable properties or characteristics of a particular geological formation which is built upon.
In some cases, the earth surrounding or near a man made structure becomes unstable and requires active support, such as by a tieback. Tiebacks are pre-tensioned subsurface supports that are used to restrain any movement of surrounding soil and rock. Tiebacks are similar to passive soil nails in construction, and can be emplaced in a similar fashion as a soil nail. More recently, soil nails and tiebacks have also been used to provide temporary and permanent excavation support and slope stabilization.
The U.S. Pat. No. 5,044,831 discloses a method of soil nailing wherein a soil nail is placed in the ground by being fired from a barrel of a launcher. The soil nail is loaded into the barrel, and pressurized gas emitted from the barrel forces the soil nail into the ground to a desired depth. One advantage of using a soil nail launcher, is that the soil nails can be emplaced with a minimum amount of labor and equipment thereby minimizing environmental impacts as well as providing a simple and economical means of strengthening the ground. Drilling is the traditional way to install soil nails, tiebacks, and anchors.
Although there are a multitude of subsurface supports and methods by which subsurface supports can be emplaced, there is still a need for simple and effective subsurface supports and an environmentally friendly manner in which subsurface supports are emplaced.
In accordance with the present invention, a method and apparatus are provided to create a subsurface support device that is placed in the ground. In a first embodiment of the invention, the support device of the present invention has many potential uses. In one use, this support device can be used as a passive soil nail. In another use, this support device of the present invention can be used as an active tieback in tension. More generally, for use as a tieback, this support device can also be referred to as a soil or rock inclusion. The term inclusion refers to the ability of the support device to increase the tensile capacity of the rock and soil. In yet another use, this support device can be used as a micropile in compression, bending and shear. This support device, when acting as a micropile, can be physically connected to an overlying structure. In yet another use, this support device can be used as an anchor in tension. For example, this support may be tensioned as by a cable that interconnects the support to a man made structure.
Once emplaced, this support device includes a protective outer member or tube, an inner support member, and a stabilizing mixture, preferably in the form of grout, cement, resin, or combinations thereof which fixes the inner support member within the outer protective member. The stabilizing mixture may also be referred to as a cementious mixture. The outer protective member supports the opening into the native rock and soil, and acts as a housing for the cementious mixture. As discussed further below, the outer member may be perforated thereby allowing the cementious material to exit the perforations and increase the overall tensile and compressive contribution of the support device. The outer protective member also provides a barrier to prevent water or other corrosive materials from contacting the inner support member. The inner support member provides the design tensile and compressive strength of the support. The inner support member may protrude a desired distance above the outer member to connect to an overlying structure to provide support in any desired manner to include bearing/compression, tension, and/or shear. The diameter and length of the outer member and inner member can be selected to provide the necessary support. The outer member and stabilizing mixture provide strengthening support to the inner member. For example, in compression, the forces are transmitted from the inner support member directly to the stabilizing mixture and the outer member. In tension, forces are also transmitted to the stabilizing mixture and the outer member thereby greatly increasing the force necessary to dislodge or pull out the inner member. The method by which the outer member of the subsurface support is emplaced in the ground is preferably by a launching mechanism, such as that disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,044,831.
In another embodiment of the present invention, the support device is in the form of an improved soil nail including a fiberglass body and a metal tip. The metal tip is preferably made from a single piece of metal, such as a machined ingot of hardened steel. The tip comprises a contacting portion or stinger that makes contact with the ground when emplaced, and a proximal base portion that is received within an opening in the distal end of the fiberglass body thus allowing the tip to be attached to the fiberglass body. The base portion may be attached by a compression fit within the opening of the body and/or may be secured by an appropriate bonding agent, such urethane glue. The size and dimensions of the soil nail can be modified for the intended purpose of use. One common size acceptable for use in many soil stabilization efforts includes a fiberglass body of twenty feet in length and a contacting portion of the metal tip extending approximately six inches in length from the distal end of the fiberglass body. For those applications in which a shorter body is required, the same tip construction can be used, and the length of the body can simply be shortened. Unlike most prior art soil nails, the soil nail of the present invention has a tubular shaped body without projections which allows the soil nail to be emplaced by the soil nail launcher disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 5,044,831. The use of a soil nail with a fiberglass body in conjunction with a metal tip provides many advantages. The fiberglass body provides a more cost effective solution than traditional soil nails that are just made of metal. The fiberglass body also is highly resistant to corrosion, even more so than many metal soil nails within corrosion treated surfaces. The weight of the soil nail of the present invention is also less than a metal soil nail, allowing it to achieve greater velocity when emplaced by a soil nail launcher, thus enhancing its ability to penetrate the ground. The strength of the soil nail is not compromised because the fiberglass has adequate strength, and has a greater elastic limit as compared to many metal soil nails enabling the nail to handle even greater tensile and shear loads. Although the soil nail has a relatively smooth outer surface allowing it to be emplaced by a launcher, the surface characteristics of the fiberglass provide excellent adhesion with soil. Additionally, the stinger can be especially designed to handle particular soil or rock formations without having to modify the body of the soil nail. For example, in more dense soil or rock formations, the stinger shape can be modified prior to assembly with the body thus making the soil nail more adaptable for many uses.
Other features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent by a review of the following figures, taken in conjunction with the detailed description.
Referring to
Referring now to
Although a launcher of a particular construction is illustrated in
Now referring to
Additionally, the subsurface support of the present invention can be used in combination at a particular jobsite to support an overlying structure and to stabilize surrounding soil. In this case, one or more support devices can be structurally connected to an overlying structure such as shown in the figures, and one or more additional support devices can be used as soil nails to stabilize the surrounding soil or rock formation. Even in tunnel construction, the support device of the present invention can be used to stabilize the soil or rock formation surrounding the tunnel. In a tunnel, a support device can be emplaced in any orientation to include stabilizing the ceiling/upper surface of the tunnel.
Referring to
With the method and apparatus of the present invention, a subsurface support is provided which can be emplaced with a minimum of effort. In one advantage of the present invention, the subsurface support provides an alternative to other anchoring means because the outer tube provides protection to the inner support member from corrosion or other undesirable environmental factors. Depending upon the geological conditions, the outer tube can be emplaced with a launching device that is adapted to account for varying geological formations. For example, ground formations with little rock allows emplacement of the outer tube with a minimum of force while placement of the outer tube into an actual rock formation would require a greater force provided by the launching mechanism. In any case, the particular launching device chosen may have the capability of emplacing the outer tube to the appropriate depth and through various rock and soil conditions. In another advantage of the present invention, an improved soil nail is provided in a two-piece construction. This construction is cost effective yet provides at least the same performance as compared to a soil nail made of a single piece of material.
While the method and the apparatus of the present invention have been provided in preferred embodiments, it shall be understood that various other changes and modifications may be made within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/741,951, filed on Dec. 18, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,226,247 entitled “Method and Apparatus for Creating Soil or Rock Subsurface Support”, the disclosure of this application being hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
571225 | Geisel | Nov 1896 | A |
1597573 | Blue | Aug 1926 | A |
3060694 | Homes | Oct 1962 | A |
3286416 | Ashworth | Nov 1966 | A |
3487646 | Gatien | Jan 1970 | A |
3496729 | Pleuger | Feb 1970 | A |
3808624 | Barkdull, Jr. | May 1974 | A |
3981038 | Vidal | Sep 1976 | A |
4181995 | Zur | Jan 1980 | A |
4360292 | Keeler et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4564313 | Niswander et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
4564967 | Vidal | Jan 1986 | A |
4571124 | Matsui et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4610568 | Koerner | Sep 1986 | A |
4993872 | Lockwood | Feb 1991 | A |
5044831 | Myles et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5472296 | von Allmen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5494378 | Hanson | Feb 1996 | A |
5542785 | Cloud | Aug 1996 | A |
5549418 | Devine et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5669199 | Ludwig et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5709332 | Coop | Jan 1998 | A |
5713162 | Gallo et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5713701 | Marshall | Feb 1998 | A |
5864993 | Wells | Feb 1999 | A |
5934836 | Rupiper et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6280120 | Okamoto et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6524027 | Fabius | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6533498 | Quin | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6652195 | Vickars et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6745421 | Barrett et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6776242 | Cunningham | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6820379 | Krinner et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6890127 | Barrett et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6926186 | Wells | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7025016 | Landes | Apr 2006 | B1 |
20040031214 | Fong et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040202512 | Smith | Oct 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 307 291 | Mar 1989 | EP |
002289078 | Nov 1995 | GB |
403257216 | Nov 1991 | JP |
408189035 | Jul 1996 | JP |
02004027813 | Jan 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060263150 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10741951 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11460317 | US |