The present disclosure relates generally to a cutting edge for a bowl of a scraper machine, and more particularly to a soil slicing spade bit.
One task often associated with earthwork construction projects relates to capturing soil at one location and depositing the soil at another location. The purpose of this soil movement is often to adjust elevations at different locations within a project area to some predetermined topography. Although this movement of soil can be accomplished in a variety of ways, one particular machine has demonstrated an ability to perform this earth moving task with particular efficiency. These machines are often referred to as scrapers, and typically come in the form of a machine that is pulled by a tractor, which may either be wheel or track type. While many scrapers are simply pulled by a tractor, some provide their own traction via a separate engine that applies rim pull to the wheels of the scraper. Thus, in some instances, the scraper is both pulled by a tractor and pushed through the soil via the wheels of the scraper, analogous to a four wheel drive vehicle. The scraper may also be pushed by a separate machine, such as by a track type tractor.
A typical scraper includes a bowl within which the soil is captured, and a cutting edge located adjacent a cut opening of the bowl. A depth of the cutting edge in the soil is typically set via an actuator that adjusts a pivot position of the bowl about an axle of the machine, but other strategies via raising and lowering the axle are also known. As the scraper is pulled forward, the cutting edge cuts through the soil with a cutting edge oriented perpendicular to the direction of travel, and guides the soil into the bowl. When the bowl is filled to some desired capacity, the bowl is pivoted up so that the cutting edge is out of contact with the soil, and the machine is transported to a deposit location where the soil is deposited. After depositing the soil, the scraper is typically returned to the soil capturing location to retrieve another load, and the duty cycle is repeated.
A typical cutting edge for a scraper is oriented perpendicular to a direction of travel of the machine, and typically extends across the width of the bowl. Some scrapers are also equipped with a so called stinger bit that provides a forward protrusion to the cutting edge across a central portion of a fraction of the bowl width. Such a structure is shown, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 3,736,664. The stinger bit structure allows the operator to select from the full cutting width by engaging the entire cutting edge with the soil, or a reduced cutting width corresponding to the width of the stinger bit when the bowl is pivoted upward to decrease the engagement of the cutting edge with the underlying soil. As the bowl approaches its filled capacity with soil, an operator may pivot up the bowl to reduce the cutting edge to the width of the stinger bit to continue filling the bowl to its capacity before transporting the soil to a deposit location. This strategy is often utilized as it becomes increasingly difficult to urge more soil into a partially filled bowl as the capacity of the bowl is approached. Although a soil capture and transport strategy using a scraper in a duty cycle as previously described has performed well for many years, there remains room for improvement. In other words, there is constant pressure to improve efficiency by both reducing the energy required to fill a bowl to its desired capacity as well as reducing the time necessary for a single work cycle to capture, transport soil, deposit soil and return for another load.
The present disclosure is directed to one or more of the problems set forth above.
In one aspect, a machine includes a bowl that defines a cut opening and is supported on a frame. A spade bit is attached to the bowl at the cut opening. The spade bit has a cutting edge with a forward protrusion flanked by swept back segments. A cut depth actuator is attached to the frame and is operable to change a cut depth of the spade bit.
In another aspect, a method of capturing soil in a bowl attached to a frame of a machine includes maneuvering the machine over soil. A position of a spade bit attached to the bowl is adjusted with respect to a soil level to engage the soil at a cut depth. The spade bit includes a forward protrusion flanked by swept back segments that slice through the soil.
In another aspect, a spade bit includes at least one metallic component having a configuration which a width dimension that is greater than a length dimension which is greater than a thickness dimension. The at least one metallic component defines a plurality of fastener bores distributed in a line along the width dimension in a pattern corresponding to a like pattern of fastener bores extending across a cut opening of a bowl of a scraper machine. The at least one metallic component includes a cutting edge extending the width dimension. The cutting edge has a spade shape with a forward protrusion flanked by swept back segments.
Referring to
Referring now in addition to
Referring back to cutting edge 31, the swept back segments 33 and 34 are oriented at an angle θ that is less than 180° but more than 160°. In the illustrated embodiment, swept back segments 33 and 34 each lie in a line. However, these swept back segments need not necessarily lie in a line, but a tangent to the swept back segments still should have an angle that is between about 160 and 180°. The term “about” means that when the number is rounded to two significant digits it corresponds to the disclosed angles. Thus, about 160 includes a range from 155 to 164. Although spade bit 18 may be attached to a bowl 16 in any suitable fashion, the illustrated embodiment shows a plurality of fastener bores 38 distributed in a line 37 in a pattern corresponding to a like pattern adjacent a cut opening 17 of a bowl 16 for a scraper machine 10. Nevertheless, other attachment strategies could be utilized including bolts, pins, welds or any other equivalent means known in the art.
Referring now specifically to
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a spade bit according to the present disclosure can take on a wide variety of shapes without departing from the present disclosure. In all versions of the present disclosure, the forward protrusion 32 will present the forward most surface of the spade bit 18. It is believed that the forward protrusion acts to help promote failure in the soil ahead of cutting edge 31, causing reduction in cutting forces required for further penetration. In addition, the swept back orientation of swept back segments 33 and 34 results in a slicing action as the spade bit moves through the soil. The term slicing means that the cutting action has a transverse velocity component that is perpendicular to the cut direction. This is to be contrast with a non-slicing action of a conventional scraper blades that are oriented perpendicular to the direction of travel and hence have no slicing action as in a spade bit 18 according to the present disclosure. Although one particular shape of spade bit 18 has been illustrated, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other shapes would fall into the scope of the present disclosure provided that they included a forward protrusion with swept back segments. Although the illustrated embodiment shows linear swept back segments 33 and 34, other surface features could be present without departing from the intended scope of the present disclosure. In addition, the present disclosure also contemplates possibly substituting existing stinger bits for a new stinger spade bit that includes a forward protrusion and swept back segments as a possible way of first introducing the concepts of the present disclosure as a retrofit into currently available machines. Thus, a spade bit according to the present disclosure is something other than a cutting edge with multiple protrusions such as that shown for instance in U.S. Pat. No. 4,704,812 since it fails to include swept back segments.
The present disclosure finds potential application as a cutting edge for any machine, especially scraper machines, that cut through soil, especially for the purpose of moving soil from one location to another. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that scraper machines may have their own source of propulsion, but are often pulled by a wheeled or track type tractor, and may even be pushed by a separate machine, such as a track type tractor. The present disclosure finds application in new machines, as a replacement part for a machine, and also as a retrofit for existing machines to take advantage of the improved performance that may be afforded by the soil slicing spade bit 18 of the present disclosure.
In a typical duty cycle, an operator will maneuver machine 10 toward a location where soil is to be captured. As the machine 10 maneuvers over that location, the operator will pivot the bowl 16 so that the spade bit 18 engages soil at a cut depth D. If the operator initially goes too deep, the machine may lose traction and could possibly stall. Therefore, some skill is often necessary in initially engaging the soil to maintain forward motion of the machine during the initial soil capture portion of the duty cycle. In those cases the machine typically has its own engine for propulsion, such as the machine shown in
During the middle segment of the cutting and soil capture procedure, the operator will typically operate the machine 10 so that it moves at a rate of about one to three miles per hour at maximum cutting depth D. As the soil capture procedure continues, it becomes increasingly difficult to push more soil into the bowl. As this occurs, the operator may adjust the pivot position of the bowl 16 so that the spade bit 18 presents a shallower cutting depth. Because of the swept back shape of spade bit 18, this may inherently result in different and smaller cutting width. This makes it easier for new soil to be pushed into the bowl 16. As the amount of captured soil begins to approach the capacity of bowl 16, the operator may then again readjust the pivot position of bowl 16 to further reduce the cutting depth (and consequently width) presented by spade bit 18. Furthermore, a shallower cutting depth tends to relax the side to side urging effect of the top surface contour to more easily allow soil to fill the center section of the bowl. At some point the desired amount of soil will have been captured and the operator will pivot the bowl 16 to a position where the cutting edge 31 of spade bit 18 no longer engages the underlying soil. At this point, the operator maneuvers the machine to a deposit location. The soil is ejected at the deposit location and then the operator returns to the capture location to begin another duty cycle in a similar manner.
Those skilled in the art will recognize that it requires substantial energy expenditures to move the cutting edge of the machine through soil by pushing pulling or otherwise moving the machine. The energy expenditure can typically be measured in quantities of fuel consumed by one or more internal combustion engines used to propel the machine over the soil retrieval site.
Referring now to the graph of
It should be understood that the above description is intended for illustrative purposes only, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present invention in any way. Thus, those skilled in the art will appreciate that other aspects of the invention can be obtained from a study of the drawings, the disclosure and the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
231148 | Brykett | Aug 1880 | A |
872439 | Livengood | Dec 1907 | A |
1503866 | Washburn et al. | Aug 1924 | A |
1741933 | Gunnison | Dec 1929 | A |
1803654 | Ronk | May 1931 | A |
1976303 | Smitt | Oct 1934 | A |
2154503 | French et al. | Apr 1939 | A |
2184045 | Jeffrey | Dec 1939 | A |
2243831 | Berner | Jun 1941 | A |
2260388 | Le Bleu | Oct 1941 | A |
2304786 | Armington et al. | Dec 1942 | A |
2629945 | Przybylski | Feb 1953 | A |
2729001 | Adams | Jan 1956 | A |
2965989 | Hibbard | Dec 1960 | A |
2981015 | Duke | Apr 1961 | A |
3011274 | Richter | Dec 1961 | A |
3021626 | Eyolfson | Feb 1962 | A |
3042123 | Fry | Jul 1962 | A |
3103752 | Rockwell | Sep 1963 | A |
3136077 | Troeppl | Jun 1964 | A |
3225467 | Troeppl | Dec 1965 | A |
3345765 | Petersen | Oct 1967 | A |
3349508 | Petersen | Oct 1967 | A |
3398472 | Leijon | Aug 1968 | A |
3497973 | Campbell | Mar 1970 | A |
3653133 | Black et al. | Apr 1972 | A |
3736664 | Black et al. | Jun 1973 | A |
3851413 | Lukavich | Dec 1974 | A |
4010561 | Klett | Mar 1977 | A |
4077142 | Klett et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
4108250 | Merkel | Aug 1978 | A |
4110921 | Poker, Jr. | Sep 1978 | A |
4123861 | Hemphill | Nov 1978 | A |
4127952 | Chamberlain | Dec 1978 | A |
4238896 | Lanz et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4343101 | Klekamp et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4449309 | Hemphill | May 1984 | A |
4704812 | Paramore, Jr. | Nov 1987 | A |
4835888 | Hemphill | Jun 1989 | A |
4969279 | Mantingh | Nov 1990 | A |
5016365 | Robinson | May 1991 | A |
5077918 | Garman | Jan 1992 | A |
5172499 | Griffin | Dec 1992 | A |
5212897 | Jefferson | May 1993 | A |
5782019 | Launder et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6032389 | Perry et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
7266914 | Grant | Sep 2007 | B2 |
20020194754 | Brown | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030066214 | Strong | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030066215 | Grant | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20060230647 | Cornelsen | Oct 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090056174 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |