This invention relates to a method for producing a solar cell from crystalline silicon and a solar cell made of crystalline silicon produced by this method.
Short circuits occur in contacting the base of crystalline silicon solar cells by overcompensation of the n-type electrically active emitter (see
To eliminate these short circuits in the industrial production of conventional solar cells, the p+n+ junction is insulated by plasma-assisted etching, by mechanical grinding of edges, by applying an insulating layer before the P-diffusion, and by the use of lasers.
In case of more complex cell geometries with interlaced p- and n-type regions (for example like EWT solar cells (J. M. Gee, W. K. Schubert, P. A. Basore; “Emitter Wrap-Through Solar Cell”; 23rd IEEE Photo. Spec. Conf., 1993, pp. 265–270), POWER solar cells (G. Willeke, P. Fath; “The POWER silicon solar cell concept”; 12th EC PVSEC, Amsterdam, 1994, Vol. 1, pp. 766–68), . . . ), the p+n+ junction is insulated on a laboratory scale by:
In past years it has been attempted, fruitlessly, both by companies (S. Robert, K. C. Hessman, T. M. Bruton, R. W. Russel, D. W. Cunningham, “Interdigitated-contact Silicon Solar Cells Made without Photolithography”, 2nd World Conference and Exhibition on PVSEC, Vienna 1998, pp. 1449–51) and by leading PV research organizations to produce insulation of p- and n-type layers by discovering analogous methods, for example such as subsequent alloying of Al after P-diffusion.
The drawbacks of the known methods can be summarized as follows:
Time- and cost-intensive additional process steps for separating the p- and n-type regions, especially in case of more complex geometries, are a great drawback in production on an industrial scale. The resultant costs, for example, have so far been one reason why back-contact solar cells have not become accepted in industrial production in spite of their numerous advantages in wiring modules.
Physical Drawbacks
1. Production of open, i.e. unpassivated p-n junctions during mechanical border separation.
2. Surface damage caused by plasma-assisted etching, which has harmful effects on cell quality because of the increased recombination associated with it.
3. The space charge zone is located directly on the cell surface from local mechanical milling off of the back face of the silicon wafer. The interference levels introduced by the surface are responsible for increased recombination (“Junction Edge Effects”)-> negative effects, especially on VOC and FF.
The problem underlying this invention consists of the fact that the difficulty of insulating p- and n-type doped layers arises with both conventional and novel crystalline silicon solar cells. This problem is solved by the present invention in a simple and elegant manner.
The task underlying this invention, namely avoiding the formation of short circuits between adjoining p- and n-type regions without any additional process steps for their insulation, is achieved as described below:
The problem can be avoided with the use of a codiffusion process. This means the simultaneous formation of emitter and back surface field (BSF) in a high-temperature step. In this process sequence, immediately after initial cleaning steps, an aluminum layer (alternative dopants such as gallium, boron, etc., that lead to p-conduction, are also conceivable) is applied to the back face of the wafer. This can be done on an industrial scale by PVD (physical vapor deposition) methods such as thermal or electron beam-assisted vapor deposition as well as sputtering, or by screen printing. If interlaced p- and n-type doped regions are to be defined, as is necessary with back-contact, high-voltage, or floating junction solar cells, this can be done by using shadowing masks provided with a p-type grid. The aluminum layer is then alloyed in during the emitter diffusion. The P-diffusion is preferably carried out from the gas phase using dopants containing phosphorus, such as POCl3, PH3, PBr3, etc. Alternative methods are also conceivable, such as imprinting, spraying, or spin-coating of dopant media (pastes and liquids containing P), as well as by the deposition of dielectric layers containing P by methods such as LPCVD (low pressure chemical vapor deposition) or APCVD (atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition)—P:SiO2.
In summary it can be stated that the method pursuant to the invention represents a substantial improvement in the simple production of novel solar cells such as back-contact and high-voltage solar cells and solar cells sensitive to light on both sides. Furthermore, it will provide important momentum in the future production of more economical industrial solar cells using thin silicon wafers and the local back-contacting necessary for them. It may also lead to simplification of the present manufacturing method for conventional industrial solar cells.
The advantages of the invention are as follows:
Using the codiffusion process, three process steps of standard production
-> emitter formation,
-> BSF formation,
-> process steps for insulating the pn junction are replaced by a single high-temperature step, with the generally customary process steps for insulating the pn junction and which usually comprise several costly individual steps (e.g. whole-surface deposition of silicon nitride (SiN)-> application of etching varnish-> removal of the SiN from the unvarnished areas-> . . . ).
1. p-type base material 1
2. Emitter formation (n+) by diffusion from the gas phase 4
3. Alloying of a p-type doped layer; the back-face emitter is then overcompensated, and a highly doped p+ BSF region 4 is formed
4. Shunt formation at the p+n+ junction 8.
The invention was tested as described below:
The codiffusion process was used on 5×5 cm2 standard cells with both flat and grid-type BSF. The shunt values of several thousand Ωcm2 could be reproduced repeatedly. The efficiency of these codiffused cells with no additional process steps to insulate the p- and n-type regions reached values of up to 13.5%. The process sequence was also used on novel solar cell structures (EWT solar cells). In this case efficiencies of up to 9.55% were reached, and recently even up to 10.1% (without ARC). EWT solar cell production was tested successfully both on Cz-Si and on multicrystalline Si and EFG (Edge-defined Film-fed Growth) Si. The Jsc values were 25.4 mA/cm2 for flat Cz-Si EWT cells without ARC; 23.4 mA/cm2 for flat mc-Si EWT solar cells without ARC. The limiting factors in this process are unoptimized series resistances.
The invention will be explained below with reference to two examples of the embodiment. The above-mentioned and other features and advantages of this invention, and the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention itself will be better understood by reference to the following description of embodiments of the invention taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
a shows a cross-sectional view of a p-type crystalline silicon wafer;
b shows the application of a dopant layer to the wafer of
c shows the wafer of
d shows the wafer of
a shows a p-type crystalline silicon wafer, in cross section;
b shows the wafer of
c shows the application of a dopant layer to the wafer of
d shows the wafer of
e shows the wafer of
f shows the wafer of
Corresponding reference characters indicate corresponding parts throughout the several views. The exemplification set out herein illustrates one preferred embodiment of the invention, in one form, and such exemplification is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention in any manner.
In
In
A description of the individual steps of the invention follows, with reference to the above described embodiments.
a–2d: Codiffusion process
a: p-type crystalline silicon wafer
b: Application of a p-type dopant layer 2
c: Codiffusion process; i.e. emitter formation (n-type) 4 with simultaneous alloying of the p-type dopant layer 3.
d: Application of the front contact, and if needed also of a back contact with smaller dimensions than the alloyed p-type dopant layer 5.
a–3f: Al-Si etching:
a: p-type crystalline silicon wafer 1
b: Production of an n-type emitter 4 by diffusion from the gas phase
c: Application of a p-type dopant layer 2
d: Overcompensation of the n-type emitter 4 by alloying in the p-dopant layer with the formation of a highly doped p+ layer 7 and a metallic back contact of eutectic composition 9
e: Removal of the metallic back contact 9, so that only the highly doped p+ region 7 remains
f: Application of a front contact and of a smaller base contact 5 so that the p+n+ junction remains unmetallized.
While this invention has been described as having a preferred design, the present invention can be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
100 21 440 | May 2000 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE01/01625 | 4/27/2001 | WO | 00 | 10/30/2002 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO01/84639 | 11/8/2001 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4152824 | Gonsiorawski | May 1979 | A |
5082791 | Micheels et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5461002 | Safir | Oct 1995 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 776 051 | Nov 1995 | EP |
59182577 | Oct 1984 | JP |
05-075148 | Mar 1993 | JP |
05075148 | Mar 1993 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030102022 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |