The present invention is directed to solar energy harvesting devices, and more particularly to waveguide-type concentrating solar energy harvesting devices in which a stimuli-responsive material (SRM), such as a phase-change material (PCM) having a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) slightly above room temperature, is dispersed in the waveguide material to form self-aligned light scattering structures.
Photovoltaic (PV) cells are used to convert solar energy (sunlight) into electricity, and are typically implemented either in flat-panel arrangement, or in conjunction with concentrating solar collectors.
Solar Energy Harvesting Requires Inexpensive Large Area Components
Solar energy arrives at the surface of the earth as a relatively dilute form of radiant energy, peaking at approximately 1000 W/m2. Any solar energy harvesting system is therefore required to cover a relatively large area in order to intercept enough sunlight for a meaningful power output. The intercepting area can consist of the energy converting components themselves (e.g., photovoltaic cells in a flat panel module) or consist of optical elements used to direct the intercepted light to a typically smaller converting component (e.g., a higher performance photovoltaic cell in a solar concentrator system). Due to the low price of electricity to which industrialized nations have become accustomed, the key techno-economic challenge and driver is to make the solar energy harvesting system very inexpensive per unit area.
Fabrication processes for photovoltaic cells (PV cells) have benefited from the mature status and sustained progress in semiconductor manufacturing techniques developed for the field of microelectronics. Although it can be expected that process improvements will continue to lower the cost of PV cells into the future, the often cited analogy with Moore's law in microelectronics is only partially appropriate: Moore's law rests heavily on a reduction in surface area per useful unit (e.g. a transistor), while the useful unit in a PV cell is surface area itself. The usefulness of the surface area can be modified in a first example by improving the efficiency of the PV cell, which—being an efficiency metric—naturally has fundamental limits forcing the progress trajectory into an S-curve, and is not the objective of this invention. The usefulness of the surface area can be modified in a second example by optical concentration. It is on of the objectives of this invention to achieve moderate concentration levels (e.g., 10× to 40×, or sometimes higher) with system components that can scale to very low cost and do not incur the system disadvantages typically associated with conventional solar concentrators.
Benefits of Solar Concentration
Historically, a single one of the beneficial aspects of low/medium concentration PV systems dominated the discussion: this dominant aspect was the paradigm of “saving silicon”, which cannot be the only motivation anymore in times of low cost silicon feedstocks now available for PV cell production. Whether flat panel PV cells or PV cells working in somewhat concentrated light environments will form the mainstay of our futures solar energy systems is still heavily debated today. Extrapolations are subject high uncertainty due to the industrial network effects unfolding over time. While flat panel approaches may well win the race to grid parity, there are some important arguments to note in favor of concentrated approaches. These benefits are given here with a bias towards low/medium concentrators and receivers of similar complexity to crystalline silicon PV cells:
(1) A solar harvesting device having only a portion of the surface area consisting of fragile, electrically connected PV cells allows more degrees of freedom in the system design. These can be used to make the system more robust, flexible, easier to ship, partially translucent, building integrated, just to name a few possible directions. An economic degree of freedom is won by the fact, that a low/medium concentrator can make good use of higher efficiency cells (e.g. high efficiency silicon or similar), that might be temporarily or systematically not quite competitive for flat panel application under 1× sun.
(2) A large fraction of the capital expenditure of PV module manufacturing goes towards the fabrication machinery for PV cell manufacturing. Producing more total PV module area per year normally requires the installation of proportionally more machinery. This can limit the growth of such a technology and business domain, as the capital for expansion often is the limiting resource. Organic growth from reinvesting profits may be too slow for staying on top of competitors in the market or climate goals in the world. A concentration system can mitigate such capital imposed limits and allow faster scale-up in terms of GWp/year, since the electrical productivity of each cell leaving the (capacity limited) production line is increased by the flux concentration factor F=Cg*η (where η is the optical efficiency of the concentrator). Of course, this strategy only holds if the capital cost to obtain fabrication capacity for the optical concentrator is lower on a per Watt basis than the PV cell fabrication facility (fab). This is particularly true for optical concentration elements that can be manufactured on existing machinery. As explained below, systems described in this invention can be manufactured e.g. on fabrication lines similar to those used for building windows (“insulating glass units”, IGUs). The optical focusing elements, particularly lenses, can be straightforwardly realized in multiple ways. As a first exemplary option, the low optical demands on the (non-imaging) topography allow to use simple “textured glasses” (e.g. verified with “Pilkington Cross Reed 0.5 inch” glass), which are produced at low cost for fenestration products. As a second exemplary option, the optical focusing elements can manufactured on film or foil manufacturing equipment, such as the microoptical film fabrication equipment that exists today for display backlighting films. These plants have an annual capacity in the hundreds of square kilometers per year. The ability to rapidly scale up production will become a particularly prominent competitive differentiator, as soon as solar energy first undercuts the costs of established fossil fuel based generation.
(3) Concentrator photovoltaics can drastically reduce the embodied energy in the solar energy harvesting system per peak Watt installed when compared to flat panel PV cells. This shortens the energy payback time of the system and similarly the “energy returned on energy invested”.
(4) Returning to the initial point made above, a low/medium solar concentrator with good manufacturability can reduce the cost per installed W compared to flat panel systems, if disadvantages of prior art concentrators (such as tracking requirements) are avoided.
Passive Optical Concentrators in the Prior Art
Prior art solar concentrators utilize optics (e.g., reflectors, lenses, etc.) to focus sunlight onto a relatively small PV cell. This can be motivated by direct cost savings (e.g., when the area specific cost of the optics is lower than the cost of the PV cell), and/or by the desire for higher system efficiencies (e.g., by allowing to use high performance PV cells that are only available and economic in small areas).
In prior art passive optical systems, concentration typically leads to the requirement of mechanical tracking. The roots for this causation are of fundamental physical nature, and can be outlined as follows: Concentration in the spatial domain comes at the expense of an expansion in the angular domain. This is mandated by principles of conservation of phase space (i.e., Etendue). The concentration sought from a solar concentrator is a concentration in the spatial domain: The energy intercepted at a large area aperture is coupled to a small area receiver (photovoltaic or thermal) having a surface area that is smaller by a factor Cg. This causes the solid angle subtended by the incoming radiation to expand by the incoming radiation to expand by approximately the same factor (modified by the refractive index contrast and projection direction) before it reaches the smaller receiver. However, the solid angle from which a receiver can accept light is typically limited to 2π2 (hemispherical space) or in some cases to the absolute limit of the full sphere at 4π2. This limits the solid angle from which a concentrator can efficiently accept incoming radiation at its input. However, even direct sunlight originates over the course of year from within a significant portion of the sky hemisphere. The acceptance solid angle starts to become restricted to a solid angle zone narrower than this even for very low spatial concentration factors Cg, e.g. 3×. This can be improved upon by optimizing for the particular angular intensity distribution, but passive static systems beyond 10× concentration are impractical on earth.
It should be noted that the direct sunlight itself subtends only a very small solid angle at any given time. Based on this, prior art systems are able to efficiently reach higher concentration factors by going from static (untracked) systems to tracked concentrators. These tracking systems keep the relative angular position between the sun and the concentrator substantially constant in one or two of the angular dimensions; typically by mechanical movement of the systems. Mechanical tracking systems add installation cost, maintenance cost, reliability concerns, windloading problems and other disadvantages to the system. A system that achieves higher concentration factors than static concentrators without mechanical tracking is therefore highly desirable.
Luminescent Solar Concentrators in the Prior Art
A Luminescent Solar Concentrator (LSC) allows concentration without tracking of both diffuse and direct radiation and have been described in the prior art. LSCs overcome the single wavelength Etendue limits that constrain passive optical concentrators by subjecting each photon to a downward shift in energy (towards longer wavelength), e.g. via a fluorescence process. The photon energy difference is required for compliance with the governing thermodynamic principles and enables concentration factors well beyond the domain to which static concentrators are limited otherwise.
Luminescent Concentrators (LSCs) are designed to achieve a result similar to the present invention (concentration without tracking), but via a very different route: To capture the incident light, they rely on luminescent materials. The present invention does not rely on luminescent materials, but instead uses a self adaptive strategy with materials that are optically passive. After the emitted light (or scattered light respectively) is captured by total internal reflection in the lightguide, the same broad range of options to outcouple and utilize it are applicable again.
Particularly for devices integrated into building envelopes, there are two important aspects that favor the approach of the present invention over LSCs:
(1) This approach selectively couples the direct component of sunlight, while letting the diffuse daylight component pass. Thus, the two components can be handled separately (e.g. direct light used for pv electricity, diffuse light used for room lighting). The absorption in an LSC doesn't differentiate between the two angularly distinct light components, and therefore does not offer the degree of freedom offered here.
(2) While LSCs can in principle be made to exhibit a color-neutral spectrum in the residual light transmitted and their appearance, this is practically quite challenging to achieve. Since the present invention does not rely on any mechanism that (like luminescence) affects the wavelength of a captured photon, color neutrality is achieved without special consideration. This is desirable for building integrated applications.
Waveguide-Type Solar Concentrators
Another approach would be to increase the size and/or modify the shape of prism/mirrored facets 68 such that the focused sunlight remains directed onto facets 68 throughout the day. However, this approach requires covering a significant portion of the waveguide surfaces with facet structures, which impedes internal reflection and thus reduces the amount of reflected sunlight that is successfully guided along waveguide component 61 to photovoltaic cells 50. Achieving acceptance angles large enough to avoid tracking requirement, while providing sufficient concentration levels and optical efficiency is not feasible in this way.
What is needed is a solar energy harvesting device that provides the advantages of a lightguide-type (waveguide-type) solar concentrator, but avoids the alignment/tracking requirement associated with existing prior art devices.
The present invention is directed to a lightguide-type solar energy harvesting device that avoids the alignment/tracking associated with existing prior art lightguide-type (waveguide-type) solar devices by utilizing a stimuli-responsive material (SRM) disposed in a lightguide (waveguide) structure that generates light scattering structures wherever solar radiation (sunlight) is concentrated in a sufficient amount. The solar energy harvesting device includes the SRM-bearing lightguide structure, a solar radiation (sunlight) concentrating member (e.g., a lens array) disposed to concentrate sunlight within the lightguide, and a solar energy receiver (e.g., a PV cell) positioned to receive at least a portion of the captured sunlight exiting the lightguide. According to an aspect of the present invention, the SRM is evenly distributed throughout the lightguide material layer, which is otherwise substantially transparent, and the solar radiation concentrating member is formed and arranged such that the sunlight is focused (concentrated) at one or more focal points located inside the lightguide. According to another aspect of the invention, the SRM is characterized by assuming a relatively high transparency (first) state in the absence of direct sunlight, and by a changing to a relatively opaque (second) state when subjected to a predetermined amount concentrated solar radiation (i.e., solar energy in the form of heat or light). In the preferred embodiment, the lightguide structure is formed such that only a relatively small portion (e.g., 1% to 10% of the cross-sectional area) of the SRM in the material layer changes from the relatively transparent first state to the opaque second state, where the portion is disposed in “focal zone” regions that surround or are otherwise disposed adjacent to each focal point defined by the sunlight concentrating member. By positioning the sunlight concentrating member (e.g., lens array) to focus sunlight at focal points disposed inside the lightguide material layer, and by distributing the SRM evenly throughout the material layer, the device effectively provides a self-aligning mechanism in that light scattering regions are generated in any portion of the lightguide material layer that coincides with the focal points for the current incidence direction, thereby minimizing manufacturing costs by avoiding the need for alignment (both initial and tracking during operation to follow the apparent motion of the sun) between the light concentrating member and fixed points on the lightguide.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the SRM is distributed in the lightguide material layer in suitable amount such that the SRM (and, hence, the lightguide material layer) remains substantially entirely transparent to solar radiation in the first state, and such that, when the portion of the SRM located in the focal zones is in the opaque/scattering (second) state, at least 40% of the concentrated solar radiation directed into the focal zone is redirected by the changed/opaque portion into the remaining unchanged/transparent portion of the lightguide material layer. In addition, the upper and lower boundary surfaces of the lightguide material layer are essentially entirely smooth (e.g., flat, planar, or otherwise devoid of structures such as the prism/mirrored facets utilized in prior art lightguide-type solar devices), whereby a large portion of the redirected concentrated solar radiation that is scattered or otherwise redirected from the changed/opaque SRM portion is temporarily retained within the lightguide structure by total internal reflection (TIR) between the upper and lower boundary surfaces. That is, the use of SRM to selectively generate the opaque/scattering structures within the lightguide material layer eliminates the need for the prism/mirrored facets utilized in the prior art, thereby maximizing the effectiveness of the lightguide structure to transmit the captured sunlight to the solar receivers. The amount of captured sunlight transmitted by TIR to the solar receivers is further enhanced by distributing the SRM in the lightguide material layer in a suitable amount that generates minimally sized opaque/scattering portions in the focal zones surrounding each focal point, whereby the percentage of the lightguide material that remains in the transparent state is maximized to maximize the amount of sunlight transmitted from the lightguide to the solar receivers.
According to another aspect of the present invention, the SRM is further characterized such that the SRM portion disposed in the focal zone reverses (changes back) from the opaque/scattering (second) state to the transparent (first) state when the concentrated solar radiation at the focal points subsequently decreases from a high radiation amount back to a low radiation amount. By utilizing an SRM that is reversible, the self-aligning feature of the present invention is further enhanced in that the changed/opaque SRM portion is automatically repositioned within the lightguide material layer throughout the day without requiring repositioning or tracking structures. Moreover, because the state of the SRM is reversed to a transparent (non-scattering) form when the concentrated solar radiation is no longer present, the lightguide structure is characterized by becoming substantially entirely transparent to diffuse light.
According to yet another aspect of the present invention, the light concentrating member includes an array of optical elements that are fixedly positioned relative to the lightguide structure and positioned such that the focal point defined by each optical element remains located inside the lightguide material layer throughout the daylight hours. That is, those skilled in the art will recognize that the effective focal point of an optical element is determined in part by the incident angle of the focused light (e.g., the angle of the incident sunlight). In accordance with this aspect of the invention, the concentrating member is positioned relative to the lightguide structure such that the effective focal point of the one or more optical elements remains inside the lightguide material layer for any incident sunlight direction. With this feature, an inexpensive fixed lens-type concentrating optical system (e.g., a molded glass or plastic lens array) can be used as the light concentrating member by forming the lightguide with suitable thickness and positioning the optical system such that a nominal focal point of the various lenses is located in the middle of the lightguide material layer, whereby variations in the focal length of the individual lenses and changes in the effective focal lengths throughout the daylight hours are accounted for by providing a suitably thick material layer. With varying angles of incidence, such axial shifts of the focal point have to be expected; particularly with refractive lens arrays, that are amongst the most straightforward to implement, but exhibit field curvature which causes the shift.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, the lightguide structure includes a first transparent layer and a second transparent layer with the SRM-bearing material layer being sandwiched therebetween. The first and second transparent layers are formed using a solid light transparent material (e.g., glass or clear plastic), with the outward-facing surface of the first transparent layer forming the upper (first) surface of the lightguide. The outward-facing surface of the second transparent layer forms the lower (second) surface of the lightguide. Disposing the SRM-bearing lightguide material layer between the transparent layers facilitates forming the lightguide material layer optionally as a liquid or gel, which minimizes manufacturing costs while maximizing the durability of the device.
In one embodiment the SRM-bearing material layer includes a mixture of a transparent gel/liquid carrier material and a temperature dependent SRM material that is dispersed in the carrier material. In a preferred embodiment the SRM material has a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) in the range of 30° C. and 90° C., and in a specific preferred embodiment the SRM-bearing material layer includes poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) disposed in water.
In another preferred embodiment, the SRM is selected such that the focal zone has a transparent state with a linear optical attenuation coefficient below 1.00 cm−1 when the SRM is in the transparent (first) state, thereby providing suitable conditions for transmitting light (both scattered light from other portions and diffuse light).
In another preferred embodiment, the SRM is selected such that the focal zone has a refractive index greater than 1.34 at 600 nm when the SRM is in the opaque/scattering (second) state, thereby providing suitable conditions for scattering the concentrated solar radiation (sunlight) through the remaining portion of the lightguide material layer that remains unchanged (i.e., in the transparent (first) state).
In another embodiment, the SRM comprises a phase change material (PCM) disposed in said transparent gel or liquid carrier material, wherein said PCM is characterized by assuming a first molecular structure in the transparent (first) state, and by assuming a second molecular structure in the opaque/scattering (second) state. In one specific embodiment the PCM material is a temperature-responsive polymer characterized by assuming a hydrated first molecular structure while a temperature of the solution in the focal zone remains below a predetermined LCST temperature (e.g., in the range of 30° C. and 90° C.), and by changing to a dehydrated second molecular structure when the concentrated solar radiation increases the temperature of the solution in the focal zone above said LCST temperature. Preferably, the PCM material is further characterized by transitioning from the dehydrated molecular structure back to the hydrated molecular structure when the solution temperature is reduced from above the LCST temperature to below the LCST temperature. In a specific embodiment, the PCM material comprises one of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) and Methyl-Cellulose.
In yet another specific embodiment, the SRM is a photochromic material (e.g., Spiropyrans, amongst the many other photochromics that have been developed and are well known) that is characterized by assuming a first chemical state having a light or clear color in the transparent (first) state, and by assuming a second chemical state having a dark color in the opaque/scattering (second) state, where the dark colored state is substantially less transparent than the light colored state. It should be noted that a dark colored second state is not preferred for an application where the main objective is the generation of electricity via photovoltaics. However, it can be a desirable property for controlling the amount of sunlight passed, if integrated into a building as detailed below.
In yet another specific embodiment, the SRM-bearing material layer mixture further includes one or more of a radiation-absorbing dye, a defoaming agent, a thickening agent, and an anti-freeze agent. The optional absorbing dye (e.g., NIR980A by QCR Solutions) is preferably only absorptive at wavelengths greater than 1000 nm, and assists with light absorption to create the necessary focal heating. The optional defoaming agent (e.g., Poly-Ethylene-Glycol (PEG)) is provided to assist with filling during manufacturing. The optional thickening agent (binder, e.g., a commercial cellulose derivative such as HPMC) is provided to suppress convective heat transport, thereby enhancing the desired temperature contrast between the hot focal zone and the cooler surrounding material. An optional anti-freeze agent may be added.
In yet another specific embodiment, the SRM-bearing material layer mixture is in a solid form and the transparent layers are omitted (i.e., the upper and lower surfaces of the SRM-bearing material layer form the upper and lower surfaces of the lightguide structure).
In yet another embodiment, the light concentration member includes an array of focusing elements (e.g., lenses or mirrors) disposed such that each of the focusing elements generates an associated focal point inside of the SRM-bearing material layer. In one specific embodiment, a lens array including multiple lens structures disposed in a planar arrangement such that each of the lens structures generates an associated focal point that is located inside of the lightguide structure. The benefit of this arrangement is that the lens arrays can be formed using low-cost molded glass or plastic sheets that also serves as a weather resistant outer layer for the device. In a specific embodiment, each of said plurality of lens structures causes a spatial light concentration in some plane of 3× or greater, even more preferably greater than 5×, and yet even more preferably greater than 10×, or preferably beyond. In a specific embodiment, the focal point of each of said plurality of lens structures is positioned within a central 90% portion of the lightguide material layer, and even more preferably located within a central 50% portion of the lightguide material layer. In another specific embodiment, the outer surface of the lens array is flat (planar) to facilitate cleaning and other maintenance. Moreover, forming a lens array separate from the lightguide structure facilitates providing a necessary offset gap between the lightguide structure and the light concentrating structure, which is needed to generate TIR inside the lightguide structure. The offset gap is characterized by being filled with a material that has a pronouncedly lower refractive index than the SRM-bearing material. This is commonly air or inert gas or vacuum. However, other options include aerogels and other known low index solids. It should be noted that methods exist today, to increase the refractive index of a material, e.g. by dispersion sub-wavelength particles of a high refractive index material. If such a method was employed to increase the refractive index of the SRM-bearing material substantially, then it would be possible to provide the offset gap from a more common solid material, including polymers, such as silicones.
According to another embodiment of the present invention, the device further includes a rigid frame connected to the peripheral edges of the concentrating means and the lightguide structure such that the concentrating means is maintained at a predetermined gap distance from the upper surface of the lightguide structure. By providing the frame with suitable mounting grooves, the frame both facilitates accurate and inexpensive device assembly, and maintains the necessary gap needed to facilitate TIR in the lightguide structure. In one embodiment the solar energy receiver is also mounted on the frame and disposed along a peripheral edge of the lightguide structure such that the solar energy receiver extends at least a portion of the distance between the upper and lower boundary surfaces of the lightguide structure. In alternative embodiments the solar energy receiver comprises one of a photovoltaic converter and a solar thermal device operably arranged to receive the redirected solar radiation passing out of the peripheral edges of the lightguide structure.
According to another aspect of the present invention, because a majority of the lightguide structure remains substantially entirely transparent to diffuse light, and because the SRM disposed in the focal zones changes to the opaque/scattering state such that direct sunlight is prevented from passing through the lightguide structure, the solar energy harvesting device is able to serve a secondary purpose as a self-adjusting solar transmission “skylight” apparatus on a residence or other building structure. That is, in addition to generating electricity or other converted solar energy, when mounted in place of a conventional skylight, the device serves to block most of the direct sunlight from passing through the apparatus and into the interior space disposed under the skylight/device, thereby preventing undesirable high radiance areas, attenuating fluctuations of the lighting level, preventing excessive solar heating, thereby reducing air conditioning costs, while allowing a significant amount of diffuse light to enter the interior space, thus reducing lighting costs.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings, where:
The present invention relates to a modified lightguide-type (waveguide-type) solar energy harvesting device in which a stimuli-responsive material (SRM) is evenly distributed throughout the waveguide material layer. The following description is presented to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to make and use the invention as provided in the context of a particular application and its requirements. As used herein, directional terms such as “upper”, “upwards”, “lower”, “downward”, “front”, “rear”, are intended to provide relative positions for purposes of description, and are not intended to designate an absolute frame of reference. In addition, the phrases “integrally connected” and “integrally molded” is used herein to describe the connective relationship between two portions of a single molded or machined structure, and are distinguished from the teens “connected” or “coupled” (without the modifier “integrally”), which indicates two separate structures that are joined by way of, for example, adhesive, fastener, clip, or movable joint. Various modifications to the preferred embodiment will be apparent to those with skill in the art, and the general principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments. Therefore, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the particular embodiments shown and described, but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features herein disclosed.
Referring to the upper portion of
Sunlight concentrating member 120 is fixedly disposed relative to the lightguide structure and serves to concentrate parallel solar radiation beams SR that are directed onto device 100 such that the solar radiation is concentrated at one or more focal points FP disposed inside material layer 115. That is, unlike prior art lightguide-type solar energy harvesting devices that direct light onto prism facets (or imaginably other fixedly provided coupling targets on a surface), sunlight concentrating member 120 focuses incident solar radiation beams SR such that focused solar radiation beams (e.g., solar radiation beam SR11) converge at focal point FP that is disposed between upper boundary surface 112 and lower boundary surface 114 (e.g., at a midpoint between upper boundary surface 112 and lower boundary surface 114).
According to an aspect of the present invention, lightguide structure 110 further includes a material layer 115 including a stimuli-responsive material (SRM) 116 that is evenly distributed throughout material layer 115 (i.e., substantially equal concentrations of SRM 116 are found in every region of material layer 115). SRM 116 is characterized in that all SRM 116-1 and 116-2 disposed in material layer 115 assumes a substantially transparent (first) state when material layer 115 is subjected to a relatively low (first) amount of concentrated solar radiation, and further characterized in that a portion 116-2 (e.g., a region approximately representing 1% to 10% of the cross-sectional area or volume of material layer 115) of SRM 116 that is disposed in a focal zone FZ adjacent to each focal point FP changes from the substantially transparent state to a relatively opaque state (indicated by the relatively dark shading inside focal zone FZ) when the concentrated solar radiation at focal point FP increases from a low radiation (first) amount to a predetermined high radiation (second) amount, while a remaining SRM portion 116-1 (i.e., the portion of SRM 116 in material layer 115 disposed outside focal zone FZ) remains in the transparent state (indicated by the light shading outside of focal zone FZ). The opaque/scattering state of portion 116-2 in
Referring again to
As set forth above, solar energy harvesting device 100 is distinguished over conventional lightguide-type solar devices in that, by positioning sunlight concentrating member 120 to focus incident sunlight beams SR at one or more focal points FP disposed inside lightguide structure 110, and by distributing SRM 116 evenly throughout material layer 115, device 100 effectively provides a dynamic self-aligning mechanism in which light scattering “structures” are automatically generated in any region of lightguide material layer 115 that coincides with focal points FP, thereby minimizing manufacturing costs by avoiding the need for alignment (both initial and daylight tracking) between light concentrating member 120 and fixed structures (e.g., prism facets) that are disposed on a surface of lightguide structure 110.
According to an embodiment of the present invention, SRM 116 is distributed in a substantially transparent material that otherwise forms lightguide material layer 115, and is provided in suitable amount to produce optimal light scattering characteristics within device 100. That is, an optimal amount of SRM material 116 is disposed in material layer 115 such that, as indicated in
First, upper boundary surface 112A and lower boundary surface 114A of lightguide material layer 115A are characterized as being essentially entirely smooth (e.g., flat, planar, or otherwise devoid of structures such as the prism/mirrored facets utilized in prior art lightguide-type solar energy harvesting devices), whereby a large portion of the redirected concentrated solar radiation that is scattered or otherwise redirected from SRM portion 116A-2 is temporarily retained within lightguide structure 110 by total internal reflection (TIR) between upper boundary surface 112A and lower boundary surface 114A (e.g., as depicted by arrows SR21 and SR22 in
According to another aspect of the second embodiment, SRM 116A is further characterized in that portion 116A-2 disposed in the focal zone FZ reverses (changes back) from the opaque/scattering (second) state to the transparent (first) state when the concentrated solar radiation at focal point FP subsequently decreases from a high radiation amount back to a low radiation amount. For example, referring back to
Another benefit of this invention arises from the fact that only a small volume fraction (in the focal zone) of the SRM is heated to change its state. The low thermal capacity of the small volumes allows short heat up times. Their large surface to volume ratio allows short cool down times, where the heat is dissipated quickly to the surrounding bulk SRM. Together, this enables a faster response to fluctuating sunlight conditions, than could be envisaged with a system where the bulk SRM layer as a whole undergoes a similar change of optical properties. Thereby, a room daylit through the device experiences significantly reduced objectionable fluctuations in illumination level.
Referring to
According to yet another aspect of the present embodiment, optical elements 125A of light concentrating member 120A is positioned such that the focal point FP remains located inside the lightguide material layer 115A throughout the daylight hours. That is, those skilled in the art will recognize that the effective focal points FP(t1) and FP(t2) (see
Referring to the middle portion of
Referring to the lower portion of
According to another aspect of the present embodiment, lenses (focusing elements) 125B are formed and disposed such that each lens generates an associated focal point that is located inside SRM-bearing material layer 115B. For example, as indicated in
Referring again to
As also illustrated in
Although PNIPAM provides a transparent-to-opaque phase transformation at a nearly ideal temperature for use as the SRM in the various solar energy harvesting devices described herein, the present inventors believe other SRM materials (e.g., Methyl-Cellulose) exhibiting characteristics similar to PNIPAM could also be used to produce solar energy harvesting devices falling within the spirit and scope of the present invention.
In one embodiment the SRM-bearing material layer includes a mixture of a transparent gel/liquid carrier material and a temperature dependent SRM material that is dispersed in the carrier material. In a preferred embodiment the SRM material has a lower critical solution temperature (LCST) in the range of 30° C. and 90° C. (note that PNIPAM disposed in water has an LCST of 33° C.).
In accordance with other features, the selected SRM is selected such that the focal zone has a transparent state with a linear attenuation coefficient below 1.00 cm−1 when the SRM is in the transparent (first) state, and such that the focal zone has a refractive index greater than 1.34 at 600 nm when the SRM is in the opaque/scattering (second) state.
In yet another specific embodiment, the SRM is a photochromic material (e.g. Spiropyrans) that is characterized by assuming a first molecular structure having a light or clear color in the transparent (first) state, and by assuming a second molecular structure having a dark color in the opaque/scattering (second) state, where the dark colored state is substantially (e.g., greater than 50%) more absorptive than the light colored state.
In yet another specific embodiment, the SRM-bearing material layer mixture further includes one or more of a radiation-absorbing dye, a defoaming agent, a thickening agent, and an anti-freeze agent. The absorbing dye (e.g., NIR980A by QCR Solutions) is preferably only absorptive at wavelengths greater than 1000 nm, and assists with light absorption to create the necessary focal heating. The optional defoaming agent (e.g., Poly-Ethylene-Glycol (PEG)) is provided to assist with filling during manufacturing. The thickening agent (binder, e.g., a commercial cellulose derivative such as HPMC) and the optional anti-freeze agent are utilized to generate the desired liquid/gel consistencies and performances.
In yet another specific embodiment, the SRM-bearing material layer mixture is in a solid form and the transparent layers are omitted (i.e., the upper and lower surfaces of the SRM-bearing material layer form the upper and lower surfaces of the lightguide structure).
According to another aspect of the present invention, because a majority of the lightguide structure remains substantially entirely transparent to diffuse light whether, and because the SRM disposed in the focal zones changes to the opaque/scattering state such that direct sunlight is prevented from passing through the lightguide structure, the solar energy harvesting devices described herein are able to serve a secondary purpose as a self-adjusting solar transmission “skylight” apparatus on a residence or other building structure. That is, as indicated in the graph shown in
Although the present invention has been described with reference to certain specific embodiments, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the inventive features of the present invention are applicable to other embodiments as well, all of which are intended to fall within the scope of the present invention. For example, although the present embodiment is described herein with specific reference to lens array-type concentrating members, those skilled in the art will recognize that the purpose and function of the disclosed lens arrays may be implemented using other array structures including lenses or other light focusing elements (e.g., mirrors), where each of the focusing elements focuses a corresponding portion of incident sunlight at an associated focal point in a manner similar that described herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3923381 | Winston | Dec 1975 | A |
3988166 | Beam | Oct 1976 | A |
4021267 | Dettling | May 1977 | A |
4045246 | Mlavsky et al. | Aug 1977 | A |
4053327 | Meulenberg, Jr. | Oct 1977 | A |
4084985 | Evans, Jr. | Apr 1978 | A |
4086485 | Kaplow et al. | Apr 1978 | A |
4095997 | Griffiths | Jun 1978 | A |
4114596 | Chang et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4131485 | Meinel et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4148301 | Cluff | Apr 1979 | A |
4177083 | Kennedy | Dec 1979 | A |
4221468 | Macken | Sep 1980 | A |
4224081 | Kawamura et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4234351 | Deminet et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4296731 | Cluff | Oct 1981 | A |
4320251 | Narasimhan et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
4331703 | Lindmayer | May 1982 | A |
4337758 | Meinel et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4440153 | Melchior | Apr 1984 | A |
4683348 | Pidgeon et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
4711972 | O'Neill | Dec 1987 | A |
4746370 | Woolf | May 1988 | A |
4771764 | Cluff | Sep 1988 | A |
4792685 | Yamakawa | Dec 1988 | A |
4841946 | Marks | Jun 1989 | A |
4847349 | Ohta et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4849028 | Krause | Jul 1989 | A |
4855884 | Richardson | Aug 1989 | A |
4947825 | Moriarty | Aug 1990 | A |
4952026 | Bellman et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5004319 | Smither | Apr 1991 | A |
5062899 | Kruer | Nov 1991 | A |
5089055 | Nakamura | Feb 1992 | A |
5167724 | Chiang | Dec 1992 | A |
5172170 | Hays et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5180441 | Cornwall et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5216543 | Calhoun | Jun 1993 | A |
5344496 | Stern et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5389159 | Kataoka et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5404869 | Parkyn, Jr. et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5501743 | Cherney | Mar 1996 | A |
5529054 | Shoen | Jun 1996 | A |
5540216 | Rasmusson | Jul 1996 | A |
5552820 | Genovese | Sep 1996 | A |
5559677 | Errichiello | Sep 1996 | A |
6011307 | Jiang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020554 | Kaminar et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6091017 | Stern | Jul 2000 | A |
6094273 | Asher et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097530 | Asher et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118067 | Lashley et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6130465 | Cole | Oct 2000 | A |
6131565 | Mills | Oct 2000 | A |
6140570 | Kariya | Oct 2000 | A |
6165389 | Asher et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6239353 | Hall et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6274508 | Jacobsen et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278054 | Ho et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6379521 | Nishio | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407329 | Iino et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6410644 | Mumick et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6420266 | Smith et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6451429 | Mumick et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6479395 | Smith et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6527964 | Smith et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6531653 | Glenn et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6568863 | Murata | May 2003 | B2 |
6590235 | Carey et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6597510 | Bunkenburg et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6623579 | Smith et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6896381 | Benitez et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6958868 | Pender | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7045794 | Spallas et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7152985 | Benitez et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7160522 | Minano Dominguez et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7181378 | Benitez et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7638708 | Fork et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
20020056473 | Chandra et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020148497 | Sasaoka et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020149107 | Chang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030016539 | Minano et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030051750 | Lawheed | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030232174 | Chang et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040031517 | Bareis | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040070855 | Benitez et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040084077 | Aylaian | May 2004 | A1 |
20040151014 | Speakman | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040191422 | Kataoka | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040211460 | Simburger et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050029236 | Gambino et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050034751 | Gross et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050046977 | Shifman | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050081908 | Stewart | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20060207650 | Winston et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060231133 | Fork et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070137690 | Bruning et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070137691 | Cobb et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080047605 | Benitez et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080186593 | Chan et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080308154 | Cart et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090056789 | Draganov | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090084374 | Mills et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20110031211 | Chan et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110226332 | Ford et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2606309 | Mar 2004 | CN |
1854637 | Nov 2006 | CN |
101227158 | Jul 2008 | CN |
3104690 | Aug 1982 | DE |
3205439 | Aug 1983 | DE |
3633172 | Apr 1988 | DE |
19735281 | Feb 1999 | DE |
10125273 | Jul 2006 | DE |
0200496 | Nov 1986 | EP |
0575797 | Dec 1993 | EP |
1715260 | Oct 2006 | EP |
2-122159 | May 1990 | JP |
2005-327595 | Nov 2005 | JP |
2006-83036 | Mar 2006 | JP |
20010104037 | Nov 2001 | KR |
9428361 | Dec 1994 | WO |
0049421 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0049658 | Aug 2000 | WO |
02097724 | Dec 2002 | WO |
2007104028 | Sep 2007 | WO |
WO2007109901 | Oct 2007 | WO |
WO2008005557 | Jan 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Gyenes, et al “Electrically adjustable thermotropic windows based on polymer gels”, polymers for advanced technologies, 14, 2003, 757-762. |
Knorov, et al, “Three-dimensional reversiable laser micromachining with subnanjoule femtosceond pulses based on two-photon photochroism”, Applied Physics B, 76, 2003, 707-710. |
Goetzberger, Adolf, et al. “Self-Regulatng Glare Protection System using Concentrated Solar Radiation and Thermotropic Coating”, Solar Energy, vol. 69, Nos. 1-6, 2000, pp. 45-47. |
Nitz, Peter and Helge Hartwig, “Solar control with thermotropic layers”, Solar Energy 79 (2005), pp. 573-582. |
Mulligan et al. “A Flat-Plate Concentrator: Micro-Concentrator Design Overview”, 2000 IEEE, pp. 1495-1497. |
Terao et al. “A Mirror-Less Design for Micro-Concentrator Modules”, Conference Record of the 28th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (2000) pp. 1416-1419. |
Mulligan et al. “Development of Chip-Size Silicon Solar Cells”, IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, 2000, pp. 158-163. |
Bett et al. “Flatcon and Flashcon Concepts for High Concentration PV”, Presented at the 19th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conf., Jun. 7-11, 2004, Paris, 4 pages. |
Benitez et al. “High-Concentration Mirror-Based Kohler Integrating System for Tandem Solar Cells”, WCPEC2006, 4 pages. |
Terao, Akira “MicroDish: A Novel Reflective Optic for Flat-Plate Micro-Concentrator”, SPIE's 49th Annual Meeting, Aug. 2-6, 2004, Denver, Colorado, USA, 9 pages. |
Sun et al. “Modeling and Experimental Evaluation of Passive Heat Sinks for Miniature High-Flux Photovoltaic Concentrators”, Transactions of the ASME, vol. 127, pp. 138-145 (2005). |
Gordon et al. “Optical performance at the thermodynamic limit with tailored imaging designs”, Applied Optics, in press, Dec. 2004, 16 pages. |
Alvarez et al. “RXI Concentrator for 1000X Photovoltaic Energy Conversion”, Proc. SPIE, vol. 3781, 30 (1999), 9 pages. |
Swanson, Richard M. “The Promise of Concentrators”, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 8, pp. 93-111 (2000). |
Nguyen, Luu “Wafer Level Packaging for Analog/Mixed Signal Applications”, MEPTEC Int. Wafer Level Packaging Conference, Aug. 22, 2002, 41 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120132255 A1 | May 2012 | US |