These concepts build upon the following WES patent applications all of which are incorporated by reference herein:
The present invention is related to components of CSP (Concentrated Solar Power) frames including node, strut end piece, chord and beam designs and alternative methods of attaching these to their associated struts, chords, beams and nodes; it also covers elements of torque plate designs, solar frame alignment tools and a design to clean dust or sand from mirrors without the use of water (limited resource in and regions). (As used herein, references to the “present invention” or “invention” relate to exemplary embodiments and not necessarily to every embodiment encompassed by the appended claims.) Some of inventions, such as the use of cast or impact extruded strut/chord/beam end pieces fastened and/or bonded to longer structural members, have applicability to fields beyond CSP (in fact, to any potential structural application).
This section is intended to introduce the reader to various aspects of the art that may be related to various aspects or the present invention. The following discussion is intended to provide information to facilitate a better understanding of the present invention. Accordingly, it should be understood that statements in the following discussion are to be read in this light, and not as admissions of prior art. CSP (Concentrated Solar Power), particularly the parabolic trough utility scale facilities, are a proven source of renewable energy. Florida Power and Light operates a facility in the Mojave Desert which has operated for decades, which is based on a steel framework supporting the parabolic mirrors. Parabolic mirrors focus sunlight on an oil filled tube, and the hot oil is transferred to a conventional steam electrical power plant (the hot oil boils the water to steam, which drives the turbines).
Nevada Solar One (NSO) came on line a few years ago—the first new parabolic trough CSP plant in the US since the Mojave Desert installation. NSO used aluminum extrusions, fabricated and assembled into mirror support frames instead of structural steel. Continued installation of these types of CSP utility scale operations requires continual development in the technologies to improve performance and reduce costs.
The WES solar frame designs (see prior WES patent applications noted above (Cross-Reference to related applications), incorporated by reference herein) incorporate improvements in the extruded and other profiles and components and in the way that they are combined into a framework to support the mirrors. These improvements yield a more efficient system—from profiles that are more easily extrudable at a wider variety of available extrusion operations through parts that are easily fabricated and assembled, utilizing the unique design opportunities provided by the aluminum extrusion process and by other processing and joining techniques discussed in this patent application which work to both enhance performance and reduce the overall cost of the final installation.
The present invention pertains to an apparatus for transferring force to a frame of a solar mirror array. The frame has at least one structural element. The apparatus comprises a torque plate. The apparatus comprises at least one node attached to and in contact with the plate which connects with the structural element.
The present invention pertains to a method for transferring force to a frame of a solar mirror array. The frame has at least one structural element. The method comprises the steps of attaching a node to a torque plate. There is the step of attaching the structural element to the node of the frame which supports solar mirrors.
The present invention pertains to an apparatus for attaching a primary solar mirror frame array with a secondary mirror frame array. The apparatus comprises a primary torque plate having an upper portion and a bottom. The apparatus comprises a secondary torque plate having an upper portion and a bottom. The apparatus comprises a torque plate bearing attached to the primary and secondary torque plate through an attachment flange of the primary and secondary torque plate. The primary and secondary torque plates attach to an end of the primary and secondary frame, respectively, via nodes of the frames that fasten to the upper portions and the bottom of the respective plates. The flange between the primary and secondary torque plates allows for rotational alignment between the primary and secondary torque plates.
The present invention pertains to a solar trough frame for bolding solar mirrors. The frame comprises a plurality of chords which include a top layer of only 4 chords essentially in parallel with each other. The frame comprises a plurality of struts. The frame comprises a plurality of nodes that connect to the struts and chords. The frame comprises a platform supported by the chords and struts on which the solar mirrors are disposed.
The present invention pertains to a method of forming a solar trough frame for holding solar mirrors of a solar frame array. The method comprises the steps of attaching a first strut to a top layer having at least 4 chords essentially in parallel with each other. There is the step of attaching a second strut to the top layer upon which a platform is supported and on which the mirrors are disposed.
The present invention pertains to a structural element for a support frame for solar mirrors of a solar array. The structural element comprises a strut end piece. The structural element comprises a strut. The structural element comprises adhesive disposed between the strut and the strut end piece which fixedly attaches the strut and the strut end piece together.
The present invention pertains to a structural element for a support frame for solar mirrors of a solar array. The structural element comprises a strut end piece. The structural element comprises a strut fixedly attached with solid phase bonds to the strut end piece formed from strut and strut end piece without any additional solder or weld material.
The present invention pertains to a method for attaching a strut and a strut end piece together. The method comprises the steps of placing the strut end piece in contact with the strut. There is the step of rotational welding the strut end piece to the strut.
The present invention pertains to a method for attaching a strut and a strut end piece together. The method comprises the steps of placing the strut end piece in contact with the strut. There is the step of friction stir welding the strut end piece to the strut.
The present invention pertains to an apparatus for cleaning mirrors of a solar mirror array on a support frame having pylons from a vehicle. The apparatus comprises a blower assembly mounted on the vehicle. The apparatus comprises a blower mounted on the assembly that blows air at a mirror of the array when the vehicle is positioned alongside the mirror, the assembly moving the blower up and down.
The present invention pertains to an apparatus for aligning a longitudinal member. The apparatus comprises a holder having an adjustment mechanism that fits with a first end of the first longitudinal member which holds a laser. The apparatus comprises a receiver that fits with a second end of the longitudinal member. The receiver has a grid upon which light from the laser shines. The adjustment mechanism adjusted so the light from the laser is centered about an axis of the longitudinal member.
The present invention pertains to a method for aligning longitudinal members between two solar frames so the two solar frames are aligned. The method comprises the steps of fitting a holder having an adjustment mechanism which holds a laser with a first end of a first longitudinal member of a first frame. There is the step of fitting a receiver with a second end of the first longitudinal member, the receiver having a grid upon which light from the laser shines, the adjustment mechanism adjusted so the light from the laser is centered about an axis of the first longitudinal member. There is the step of removing the receiver from the first longitudinal member. There is the step of placing the receiver into a first end of a second frame's longitudinal member so that the second frame can be aligned to the first frame.
The present invention pertains to a node for connecting struts and chords of a support frame for solar mirrors of a solar mirror array. The node comprises a solid central portion having a first end to which the chord is attached and which chord has an axis along its length substantially in alignment with a longitudinal axis of the central portion. The central portion has fins which extend from the central portion. The fins define at least two pairs of parallel spaced opposing substantially flat surfaces. The surface of each pair is spaced equidistantly from a center plane between them to which a strut is attached to each pair.
In the accompanying drawings, the preferred embodiment of the invention and preferred methods of practicing the invention are illustrated in which:
Referring now to the drawings wherein like reference numerals refer to similar or identical parts throughout the several views, and more specifically to
The node 22 may have at least one fin 24 extending from the node's outer surface. The node 22 may have a solid central portion. The torque plate 68 can withstand a force greater than 1,800 lbs. The torque plate can withstand a minimum torque load of about 150,591 in-lbs. The plate 68 thickness may be about 9/16″.
The present invention pertains to a method for transferring force to a frame of a solar mirror array. The frame has at least one structural element. The method comprises the steps of attaching a node to a torque plate. There is the step of attaching the structural element to the node of the frame which supports solar mirrors.
The present invention pertains to an apparatus 77 for attaching a primary solar mirror frame 58 array with a secondary mirror frame 58 array. The apparatus 77 comprises a primary torque plate 72 having an upper portion and a bottom. The apparatus 77 comprises a secondary torque, plate 74 having an upper portion and a bottom. The apparatus 77 comprises a torque plate bearing 76 attached to the primary and secondary torque plates through an attachment flange 80 of the primary and secondary torque plate. The primary and secondary torque plates attach to an end of the primary and secondary frame, respectively, via nodes 22 of the frames 58 that fasten to the upper portions 79 and the bottom 81 of the respective plates. The flange 80 between the primary and secondary torque plates allows for rotational alignment between the primary and secondary torque plates.
The primary torque plate 72 may have an attachment flange 80 and the secondary, torque pate 74 may have a marching hole 82 pattern to that of the primary torque plate's 72 attachment flange 80, and the bearing 76 is attached to the primary and secondary torque plates through the attachment flange 80 of the primary and secondary torque plates. The apparatus may include a first lifting bracket 88 attached to the primary torque plate 72 and a second lifting bracket 88 attached to the secondary torque plate 74 for lifting the frame 58 via the primary and secondary torque plates. The primary torque plate 72 may have a cross shape. The upper portion 79 of the primary torque plate may have a first cross arm 83 and a second cross arm 85.
The present invention pertains to a solar trough frame 58, as shown in
The four chords 60 of the top layer may have axial force limits of a minimum of about 500 lbs. The frame 58 may include a torque plate 68 having two connections to the top layer of chords 60. At least one of the four chords 60 of the top layer 61 may be one continuous piece that extends the frames entire length. Alternatively, at least one of the four chords 60 of the top layer 61 is formed of segmented chords 28 that together extend the frame's entire length. The four chords 60 of the top layer 61 may have axial force limits of a maximum of about 20,674 lbs.
The present invention pertains to a method of forming a solar trough frame for holding solar mirrors of a solar frame array. The method comprises the steps of attaching a first strut to a top layer having at least 4 chords essentially in parallel with each other. There is the step of attaching a second strut to the top layer upon which a platform is supported and on which the mirrors are disposed.
The present invention pertains to a structural element for a support frame for solar mirrors of a solar array. The structural element comprises a strut end piece. The structural element comprises a strut. The structural element comprises adhesive disposed between the strut and the strut end piece which fixedly attaches the strut and the strut end piece together.
The element, may include guides disposed between the strut and the strut end piece to provide spacing for the bonded joint. The strut wall thickness may be between 0.035 and 0.250″ and the strut end piece thickness may be between 0.050 and 1.000″. Together the strut and the strut end piece form a joint that can withstand loads up to between 20 and 20,000 lbs. The element may include a fastener which also attaches the strut and the strut end piece. No fastener may be used to attach the strut and the strut end piece.
The present invention pertains to a structural element for a support frame for solar mirrors of a solar array. The structural element comprises a strut end piece. The structural element comprises a strut fixedly attached with solid phase bonds to the strut end piece formed from strut and strut end piece without any additional solder or weld material.
The present invention pertains to a method for attaching a strut and a strut end piece together. The method comprises the steps of placing the strut end piece in contact with the strut. There is the step of rotational welding the strut end piece to the strut.
The present invention pertains to a method for attaching a strut and a strut end piece together. The method comprises the steps of placing the strut end piece in contact with the strut. There is the step of friction stir welding the strut end piece to the strut.
The present invention pertains to an apparatus for cleaning mirrors of a solar mirror array on a support frame having pylons from a vehicle. The apparatus comprises a blower assembly mounted on the vehicle. The apparatus comprises a blower mounted on the assembly that blows air at a mirror of the array when the vehicle is positioned alongside the mirror, the assembly moving the blower up and down.
The blower assembly may automatically position itself relative to the pylons, frames and mirrors. The apparatus may include an impact avoidance mechanism disposed on the vehicle to avoid impact by the vehicle with the pylons, frames and mirrors as the vehicle moves.
The present invention pertains to an apparatus for aligning a longitudinal member. The apparatus comprises a holder having an adjustment mechanism that fits with a first end of the first longitudinal member which holds a laser. The apparatus comprises a receiver that fits with a second end of the longitudinal members. The receiver has a grid upon which light from the laser shines. The adjustment mechanism adjusted so the light from the laser is centered about an axis of the longitudinal member.
The present invention pertains to a method for aligning longitudinal members between two solar frames so the two solar frames are aligned. The method comprises the steps of fitting a holder having an adjustment mechanism which holds a laser with a first end of a first longitudinal member of a first frame. There is the step of fitting a receiver with a second end of the first longitudinal member, the receiver having a grid upon which light from the laser shines, the adjustment mechanism adjusted so the light from the laser is centered about an axis of the first longitudinal members. There is the step of removing the receiver from the first longitudinal member. There is the step of placing the receiver into a first end of a second frame's longitudinal member so that the second frame can be aligned to the first frame.
The present invention pertains to a node for connecting struts and chords of a support frame for solar mirrors of a solar mirror array. The node comprises a solid central portion having a first end to which the chord is attached and which chord has an axis along its length substantially in alignment with a longitudinal axis of the central portion. The central portion has fins which extend from the central portion. The fins define at least two pairs of parallel spaced opposing substantially flat surfaces. The surface of each pair is spaced equidistantly from a center plane between them to which a strut is attached to each pair.
In the operation of the present invention, the description of the present invention, which follows, incorporates further improvements to the WES designs, covering the node 22, strut 16, strut end piece 10, chord, chord end piece 36, beam 46, beam end piece 38, torque plate 68, torque plate nodes, torque plate 68 alignment and adjustments and other components of the frame design and means to join these components together as needed for the design; a water free mirror 122 cleaning system is also disclosed. Separately and together these enhancements yield the improved designs, performance and costs.
SEP (Strut End Piece) 10/Strut 16 & CEP (Chord End Piece) 36/Chord terminology can often be used interchangeably; the location of the part determines what it's called (chords, whether single long pieces or segmented, often refer to the space frame members that extend along the longitudinal direction of the frame while struts 16 are members that are not along this direction).
The prior patent applications included (but are not limited to) the following:
This patent application includes (but is not limited to) the following:
For clarity, the following description will utilize the element numbers (noted as #) and figure numbers (noted as Fig. #). For communication purposes, the various items in this patent application can be grouped into the following categories (please note that some items from one category (for example, strut end pieces 10), such as fastening means (pins, bolts, rivets, adhesives, Inertia Friction Welding, friction stir welding, even how some of the end pieces fit into the longer portions (struts 16/chords/beams 46, etc.) may apply equally well to other listings (for example chord end pieces 36) but will not be completely re-explained in each description):
1. Strut end piece 10/strut designs: Many of the components of the WES CSP solar frame 58 design share common design features. In prior patent applications WES disclosed the various designs of struts 16, chords and beams 46; while some of these were configured as single pieces with fastening holes, many of the designs utilize a long tubular central portion (strut 16, for example) with one or two end pieces (strut end pieces 10, for example) fastened to the ends. The same design philosophy can be used for chords, beams 46 or potentially other structural members. For simplicities sake, the remainder of this description will use the terms “strut” and “strut end piece”, although the same concept can be applicable to the other types of members.
In conventional space frames or trusses, the end connection of the struts 16 either to other structural members or to intermediate nodes 22 is critical, as the forces which are carried by the members must be transferred through the parts ends. Single piece struts, for example, can have pinned, riveted, bolted or otherwise fastened (mechanically interlocking, adhesively bonded, welded, etc.) connections (again, for the sake of simplicity, these will be called “pinned” for this description).
For simplicity, struts 16 loaded in a pure axial fashion are discussed (no moments applied to the members); this is often the case in the types of space frame designs used by CSP parabolic trough solar frames 58. In this document, Chords will also most often designate primarily axially loaded members while beams 46 often have side loads and moments applied to them (in the case of CSP frames often from the actual mirror 122 weight and mirror 122 wind loads attached to the beams 46). The axial forces carried by the strut 16 must be transferred to the pins (or other fastening means) and through these to the mating part (often a node 22). During component design analyses, it is important to ensure that the strut 16 and connection are designed to withstand these axial forces (reference requirements in the 2010 issue of the Aluminum Design Manual published by the Aluminum Association—widely recognized and used to guide designs of aluminum structures).
Where single piece struts 16 are used, the pins fastening these to the associated nodes 22 create healing stresses on the strut 16 material surrounding the pins (whether the struts 16 are in axial tension or compression). As the wall thickness decreases, the bearing stress increases, so decreasing wall thickness can be a tradeoff with the negative effect of increasing bearing stress. Wall thicknesses of the strut 16 must also be consistent with the manufacturing capabilities of strut 16 production (greatly reduced wall thicknesses can often increase extrusion difficulty and cost of an extruded aluminum strut 16, for example).
1. Prior WES patent applications have shown detailed designs of strut 16 profiles to enhance the overall performance while reducing manufacturing and material cost (for example, the “Apple” strut 16 disclosed in patent application Ser. No. 12/798,757). The WES extruded strut end pieces 10 are designed to be fastened to the struts 16 with two or more pins (or fastened by other means), reducing the bearing stress per pin and thus decreasing the wall thicknesses required, while maintaining the assembly's capability to carry the overall axial loads; locally thickened, strut 16 walls coupled with using multiple pins fastening the struts 16 to the strut end pieces 10 has been used as one way to ensure that the assembly performs adequately and that overall costs are kept low. The axial loads are thus transferred through the strut 16 walls to the multiple pins, and the extruded strut end piece 10 can then transfer the load to a single, larger diameter pin, acting on the strut end piece fins 12 which can be much thicker than the strut 16 walls (the strut 16 can be 4, 5 or more feet long while the strut end piece 10 is often only cut to a length of a few inches, so thicker fins add little to the weight (cost) of the structure as compared to having thicker strut 16 walls required at the fastener location.
This patent application will cover further enhancements to the strut 16 and strut end piece 10 designs (and beam 46/beam end piece 38 and chord/chord end piece 36 designs as well), designed to tradeoff end piece design and fastening means to the strut 16 with a more optimal strut 16 profile design.
The concept is to utilize adhesives, Inertia Friction Welding, friction stir welding, intermediate pieces or other means to spread the fastening load required to connect the end pieces to the longitudinal member (strut 16, chord, beam 46, etc.); by doing this, the strut 16 wall thickness can be kept as close to a consistent, thin, wall thickness as possible for the entire strut 16 profile, minimizing the overall weight (cost) of the strut 16. Similar to the discussion above, the end piece is then designed to transfer the longitudinal member's axial load to the pin connecting the thicker end piece fins to the associated node 22 connection.
2. Beam end piece 38. As noted previously, Strut 16 and Chords generally undergo axially loading as part of their designs incorporating nodes 22 (there is some MINOR side loading and moments from the weight of these relatively light members and any wind loads acting on them directly). Beams 46, on the other hand, generally see quite large side loads and moments due to the weight and wind loads associated with the reflective surfaces which depend upon them for support. The pan designs depicted in
Some designs of strut end pieces 10 and chord end pieces 36 shown in prior WES patent applications are shown as having been produced from extruded aluminum, as is this beam end piece 38 design. The difference is that in the prior designs, the fin(s) are produced in the direction of extrusion through the extrusion of aluminum through a die, while the “fins” shown in
The main feature which enhances the efficiency of die beam end piece 38 in this application is that the full cut length of the extruded end piece is resisting the side load-vs-just the extruded fin thickness in prior designs showing an extruded end piece.
Double Fin Design for Solid Node 22
This design allows for a strut 16 to be attached to our solid node 22 with or without the use of a strut end piece SEP 10. The benefits of the solid node 22 over the hollow node 22 have been explained in detail in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/927,813.
3. Torque plate 68 designs.
The bolted connections between the flange and the next torque plate 68 allow for slight rotational alignment of one frame to another. One intent is to have a torque plate 68 attached to each end of each frame when it is assembled, and to contemplate lifting the assembly via attachment brackets (
4. WES frame geometry and design.
Benefits of a frame with four top chords 60 vs. three top chords 60:
A 4 chord system allows for the beams 46 to more closely match the parabolic shape of the mirror 122 surface. This allows for shorter connections between the beam 46 and mirror 122 rail, which reduces the forces applied to the beam 46 resulting in lighter members, brackets, and fasteners. The total length of members needed to connect to the mirrors 122 is reduced up to 18.5% by using a 4 chord system compared to a 3 chord system.
A 4 chord system creates three beams 46 instead of two. These beams 46 have a shorter span which allows for smaller sections compared to a 3 chord system. This is also true for some of the struts 16. The beam 46 spans for a 4 chord system, are between 10-30% shorter than the beam 46 span for a 3 chord system.
A 4 chord system allows for two connections to the torque plate 68 at the top layer instead of one. The torque at the end of the frame is distributed over more connections/members resulting in a lighter and potentially more rigid frame. The forces at the torque plate 68-to-node connection are 37-80% smaller for a 4 chord system compared to a 3 chord system.
Specifically, the beams 46 and struts 16 in a 4 chord system can span between 40 and 200 inches. The range for the force at the torque plate 68 is greater than 1,800 lbs. to 10,000 lbs. and up to 32,000 lbs. This is the shear force located at the connection between the torque plate 68 and the nodes 22. The minimum torque load for a single torque plate 68 is about 150,591 in-lbs. the maximum is 2,520,842 in-lbs. (6,250,000 in-lbs. for hurricane prone regions). Typical would be about 700,000 in-lbs.
The purpose of these two-piece torque plate 68 designs is to allow the attachment of both torque plates 68 to the frame during the assembly process. This then allows the frames to be lifted and placed by the torque plates 68 and then adjusted for frame to frame alignment which is not possible with other frames. To accommodate such constraints, the plate thickness is about 9/16″ and the size of the plate has the dimensions shown in
5. Frame-to-frame laser 114 alignment.
The laser 114 projects a spot onto the grid of the receiver slid in to the other end of the longitudinal member, and the adjustment wheels of the holder are adjusted such that the spot is centered about the axis that the laser 114 is mounted within. The receiver 120 is then removed from the end of the longitudinal member and placed into the near end of the longitudinal member of the next frame's associated part. Note that both ends of the receiver 120 have identical mountings, including the flexible “crowders” to facilitate moving from one frame to another. The laser 114 spot deployed onto the grid of the receiver 120 in the second frame thus shows how this frame must be adjusted to come into alignment with the frame that the laser 114 and holder are associated with.
The frame laser 114 alignment tool holder, shown in
The receiver 120, shown in
6. Mirror 122 cleaning system which avoids water use. The system illustrated in
The system can easily be design with shear pins or other means to ensure that the cleaning mechanism or its mountings fail prior to any frame components in the event that there is a collision between the device and a frame; this design would incorporate easily replaceable parts to minimize repair costs and lost time in the field.
The mirror 122 surfaces (can be glass, laminated polymers, polished metal, etc.) must be protected from the blower duct 140 or other components physically touching them.
The blower assembly may automatically position itself relative to the pylons 142, frames and mirrors 122. There may be an impact avoidance mechanism disposed on the truck 124 to avoid impact by the truck 124 with the pylons 142, frames and mirrors 122 as the truck 124 moves. The Tough Sonic/PC Distance sensor (TSPC-30S1 series) with the Senix VIEW software and an Elite monochrome camera (BE-200C) is one example of an existing product that may be added to the blower assembly and the truck 124 to provide for automatic positioning of the blower assembly and for avoidance of the pylons 142, frames and mirrors 122 as the truck 124 moves. The Elite BS-430AW-KXP sensor system may also be used in conjunction with the Tough Sonic for these purposes.
7. Torque plate 68 Node Designs.
The “welded node” was designed to bring the point where the struts 16 and chords intersect as close as possible to the plane of the torque plate 68. Because of the width of the chords and struts 16, there will always be a slight offset. This offset creates a moment within the attachment node 22. By using the solid or hollow node welded to the attachment plate which then bolts to the torque plate 68 this offset is minimized, thereby minimizing the weight of the node 22 and attachment plate required. The perimeter weld shown in
Although the invention has been described in detail in the foregoing embodiments for the purpose of illustration, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that variations can be made therein by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention except as it may be described by the following claims.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/957,486 filed Apr. 19, 2018, now U.S. Pat. No. 10,648,699, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/598,963 filed Aug. 30, 2012, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,951,971 issued Apr. 24, 2018, which is a non-provisional of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/573,275 filed Sep. 2, 2011, and claims priority therefrom, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/135,137 filed Jun. 27, 2011, and is a continuation-in-part part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/927,812 filed Nov. 24, 2010, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/798,757 filed Apr. 10, 2010, and is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/587,043 filed Sep. 1, 2009, all of which are continuations-in-part of, and which this application is a continuation-in-part of, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/583,787 filed Aug. 26, 2009, which claims the benefit from U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 61/190,573 filed Aug. 29, 2008, all of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1683266 | Shipman | Sep 1928 | A |
2744472 | Symons | May 1956 | A |
2987961 | Cotton et al. | Jun 1961 | A |
3185164 | Pinero | May 1965 | A |
3228354 | Gutridge et al. | Jan 1966 | A |
3466119 | Francia | Sep 1969 | A |
3563580 | Black | Feb 1971 | A |
3564783 | Dunne | Feb 1971 | A |
3685465 | Haumer | Aug 1972 | A |
3688461 | Rensch et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
3744206 | Nelson et al. | Jul 1973 | A |
3973370 | McAllister | Aug 1976 | A |
3977800 | Cassel | Aug 1976 | A |
3999351 | Rensch | Dec 1976 | A |
4010614 | Arthur | Mar 1977 | A |
4029199 | Reens | Jun 1977 | A |
4056309 | Harbison et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4069832 | Bingham | Jan 1978 | A |
4078549 | McKeen | Mar 1978 | A |
4111184 | Fletcher et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4122646 | Sapp | Oct 1978 | A |
4136671 | Whiteford | Jan 1979 | A |
4140414 | Buttgereit | Feb 1979 | A |
4154219 | Gupta et al. | May 1979 | A |
4206748 | Goodman et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4211044 | Gugliotta et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4226550 | Kupcak et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4245616 | Wyland | Jan 1981 | A |
4247218 | Jeannin | Jan 1981 | A |
4286581 | Atkinson, Jr. | Sep 1981 | A |
4312326 | Johnson, Jr. | Jan 1982 | A |
4333446 | Smyth | Jun 1982 | A |
4432661 | Phillips et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4433672 | Hale et al. | Feb 1984 | A |
4449843 | Wendel | May 1984 | A |
4460288 | Schaff | Jul 1984 | A |
4483118 | Betschart | Nov 1984 | A |
4502200 | Anderson et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4552073 | Smith | Nov 1985 | A |
4567707 | Herman | Feb 1986 | A |
4569165 | Baker et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4570408 | Frascaroli et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4577449 | Celli | Mar 1986 | A |
4599032 | Haus, Jr. | Jul 1986 | A |
4633566 | Coppa | Jan 1987 | A |
4646503 | Brullmann et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4649899 | Moore | Mar 1987 | A |
4655021 | Franchin et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4669908 | Simone et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
4673308 | Reilly | Jun 1987 | A |
4765114 | Wesselski | Aug 1988 | A |
4835932 | Leete et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4836485 | Cooper | Jun 1989 | A |
4838003 | Zeigler | Jun 1989 | A |
4870949 | Butler | Oct 1989 | A |
4904108 | Wendel | Feb 1990 | A |
4929113 | Sheu | May 1990 | A |
5058565 | Gee et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5059056 | Banthia et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5071243 | Bronstein | Dec 1991 | A |
5191875 | Edling et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5224320 | Mai | Jul 1993 | A |
5281033 | Ide | Jan 1994 | A |
5289665 | Higgins | Mar 1994 | A |
5325844 | Rogers et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5435110 | Stol et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5556219 | Mason | Sep 1996 | A |
5787878 | Ratliff, Jr. | Aug 1998 | A |
5937849 | Myles, III et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964546 | Castano | Oct 1999 | A |
6065267 | Fisher | May 2000 | A |
D428325 | van Dreumel et al. | Jul 2000 | S |
6205739 | Newlin | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6466179 | Ehrenberg | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6485152 | Wood | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6543441 | Funger et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
D476880 | Segall | Jul 2003 | S |
6675546 | Coles | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6708455 | Niiduma | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6837010 | Powell et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6886339 | Carroll et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6892502 | Hubbell et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
7007431 | Schubert | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7203004 | Zhang | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7207137 | Wagner | Apr 2007 | B2 |
D550484 | Bonatti et al. | Sep 2007 | S |
7310920 | Hovey, Jr. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7380549 | Ratilff | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7530201 | Reynolds | May 2009 | B2 |
7578109 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587862 | Reynolds et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7802404 | Wolfram | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7823347 | Blinn | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7823583 | Allen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7950386 | Lievre | May 2011 | B2 |
7975686 | Prueitt | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8056555 | Prueitt | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8069632 | Li | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8071930 | Wylie et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8132391 | Reynolds | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8615960 | Marcotte | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8627632 | Werner et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8806834 | Werner et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8863448 | Werner et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8887470 | Werner et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8887471 | Werner et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9057543 | Marcotte et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9951971 | Werner et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
10648699 | Werner et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
20010036024 | Wood | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030041856 | Blackmon et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040045596 | Lawheed | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040128940 | LaForge | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040216734 | Lawheed | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040226249 | Wang | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050072103 | Hopwood | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050144884 | Moriya | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20060053726 | Reynolds et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060277843 | Livingston et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011983 | Reynolds | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070034207 | Niedermeyer | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070125033 | Stephan et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070261355 | Carlisle et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070272234 | Allen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080072516 | Reynolds et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080204352 | Reynolds et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080308094 | Johnston | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090056701 | Mills et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090095283 | Curtis | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090101195 | Reynolds | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113816 | Kling | May 2009 | A1 |
20090126364 | Mills et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20100005752 | Hawkins | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100043776 | Gee | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100170560 | Sapienza et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100199972 | Brost | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100229851 | Reynolds | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100252030 | Marcotte | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110056540 | Edgar | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110073104 | Dopp | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110107939 | Amiri | May 2011 | A1 |
20110232718 | Nawab | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110286121 | Werner et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120217209 | Marcotte | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20140020677 | Dominguez | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140144428 | Eisinger | May 2014 | A1 |
20150000725 | Reilly | Jan 2015 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO 2011011728 | Jan 2011 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20220011019 A1 | Jan 2022 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61573275 | Sep 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15957486 | Apr 2018 | US |
Child | 16870521 | US | |
Parent | 13598963 | Aug 2012 | US |
Child | 15957486 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13135137 | Jun 2011 | US |
Child | 13598963 | US | |
Parent | 12927812 | Nov 2010 | US |
Child | 13135137 | US | |
Parent | 12798757 | Apr 2010 | US |
Child | 12927812 | US | |
Parent | 12587043 | Oct 2009 | US |
Child | 12798757 | US | |
Parent | 12583787 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 13135137 | US | |
Parent | 12583787 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 12798757 | US | |
Parent | 12583787 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 12587043 | US | |
Parent | 12583787 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 13598963 | US | |
Parent | 12583787 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 12927812 | US |