This is the U.S. National Stage of International Patent Application No. PCT/DE2020/080406 filed Oct. 17, 2020, which claims priority to German Patent Application No. 10 2019 008 062.9 filed Nov. 20, 2019.
The present invention relates to the interconnection of solar cells in solar modules (also called photovoltaic modules) and to the prevention of high reverse voltages at these solar cells.
Solar cells (101) are interconnected in solar modules (100) according to the state of the art as shown in
Typically, all solar cells within a solar module are interconnected in series. Commercially available solar modules use 60 or 72 solar cells. The layout then consists of 6×10 or 6×12 solar cells.
Typically, three solar cell strings (102) are used in solar modules, each with 2×10 or 2×12 cells as shown in
In a photovoltaic system, solar modules are interconnected. The solar modules and cables are approved for a maximum system voltage of typically 1000 V or 1500 V. Depending on the maximum system voltage, the maximum number of solar modules that can be interconnected in series in a module string is determined. At 1000 V system voltage and 40 V module voltage, a maximum of 25 modules may be interconnected in series in one module string.
Given that the open-circuit voltage of the solar cells is temperature-dependent and increases by approx. 0.3% per degree Kelvin as the temperature drops, the maximum number of modules still depends on the minimum temperature for which the system is specified. When specified for −25° C., the module open-circuit voltage increases by 0.3%/K*50K*40 V=6 V compared to the standard temperature of +25° C. This means that with a maximum string voltage of 1000 V, only 21 modules may be interconnected in series.
This means that in this module string a total of N=60×21=1260 solar cells are interconnected in series.
Due to the serial interconnection, the same current flows through all of these 1260 solar cells. Now the current of a solar cell depends on its quality, its area and its illumination. In a photovoltaic system, sorted solar cells of the same quality and area are used. However, the illumination of the solar cells can vary, e.g. due to shading of a (partial) solar cell. Shading can be caused by clouds, interfering objects or contamination.
In case of shading of a solar cell—for the sake of simplicity, it is assumed that one cell is completely shaded, while all others are not shaded at all—the shaded solar cell (201) behaves like a diode in the dark and blocks, i.e. no current flows. Thus, no current flows in the entire string. As shown in
Vc=Vs−(N−1)Voc=−(N−1)Voc=−1295Voc=−839V
Such a high voltage in reverse direction would destroy the solar cell, avalanche breakdown of the junction would occur, especially, at so-called hotspots—local short circuits in the junction. To avoid this and at the same time prevent shading of individual solar cells from affecting the current and thus the performance of entire strings, solar modules are typically equipped with so-called bypass diodes (103), which are interconnected anti-parallel to a certain number of solar cells: The maximum reverse voltage that a solar cell can tolerate on a sustained basis is in the −13 V range. This means that each bypass diode may be interconnected in parallel to a maximum of 20 solar cells.
In the event that one cell is shaded, the current through the cell string is zero amps. The current of the other modules is then driven through the bypass diode. The diode becomes conductive and only approx. 0.5 V diode voltage drops. At the shaded solar cell, the voltage
Vc=−VD−(Ns−1)Voc=−VD−19Voc=−13,2V
is then present. This voltage is not dangerous for the solar cell and the solar module if it does not have extreme hotspots. Also the case of 72-cell modules is still uncritical for most cell types.
More cells cannot be interconnected in parallel to a bypass diode without endangering the cells. This would not be desirable for 60-cell or 72-cell modules, since in a typical system the bypass diodes already switch to bypass when only 10% of a solar cell, i.e. less than 0.2% of the module area, is shaded. In the bypass case, one loses the complete power of a cell string of e.g. 1 10 W for a 3, 30 W module. Additional loss of 5 W is caused by the voltage drop of 0.5 V at the bypass diode.
More difficult than 60-cell modules is the case of modules with half cells. With this technology, the solar cells are halved. Instead of a current of approx. 10 A, they only deliver approx. 5 A. As a result, the resistive losses in the cell connectors are quartered and the power per module increases by 6-7 W. If the halved cells were used in a standard module layout, this would mean connecting 40 solar cells instead of 20 solar cells per bypass diode. This would double the reverse voltage of the cells in the shading case. To get around this problem, half-cell modules are typically interconnected in a half-module format. Here, the module is divided into two halves as shown in
Even more complex is the consideration of bypass diodes in so-called shingle modules as shown in
It is object of the invention to enable a module layout in which more than 20 solar cells can be interconnected in series in a solar cell string without the reverse voltage of the individual cells exceeding a certain value, for example 12 V, in the case of shading.
The invention solves the object by means of an electronic circuit (601) which ensures that the string voltage always remains above a certain value Vmin.
Exemplary embodiments of the invention are described below with reference to the accompanying figures. The elements shown in the figures are not to scale. They serve to explain essential aspects of the embodiments. Complete electronic circuits and solar modules may include other elements not shown here. The features of the various embodiments can be combined with each other in any way, unless such a combination is explicitly excluded or excluded for technical reasons.
As shown in
Vc=Vmin−(Ns−1)Voc
Vmin is the string voltage and at the same time the input voltage of the electronic control circuit (601). If the reverse voltage of a solar cell should not exceed Vc=−12 V, this results in:
Vmin>Vc+(Ns−1)Voc=−12V+(Ns−1),67V
In a string with 20 cells, Vmin=0.73 V. In a string with 60 cells, Vmin=27.5 V. To ensure that no power is lost in the illuminated case, Vmin should not be greater than the voltage VMPP at the maximum power point. For VMPP, the following applies to typical solar modules: VMPP=Ns0.84 Voc. This results in a maximum number of solar cells per string as shown in
Since VMPP depends logarithmically on irradiance, the dependence of the minimum irradiance required for VMPP to be greater than Vmin, shown in
If the irradiation is lower than the minimum irradiation, VMPP is below Vmin. The operating point thus shifts towards idle with decreasing irradiation. When the solar cells are no longer able to provide the voltage Vmin, the system shuts down. In one embodiment of the invention, the electronic circuit measures the irradiance, for example by measuring the current. This allows the input voltage to be reduced as irradiance decreases, so that when there is no irradiance Vmin can become greater than VMPP.
The open circuit voltage of solar cells is fairly linearly dependent on temperature. With increasing temperature the open circuit voltage decreases according to
Voc=Voc(T=25° C.)−β(T−25° C.),
wherein β for a solar cell is typically in the range of 0.27%/K or 1.8 mV/K. To ensure that the reverse voltage of the solar cells does not exceed 12V in the shading case even at low temperatures of, for example, −50° C., one embodiment of the invention measures the temperature and adjusts the minimum input voltage Vmin to the temperature according to
Vmin>Vc+(Ns−1)Voc=Vc+(Ns−1)(Voc(Toc=25° C.)−β(T−25° C.)).
In a further embodiment of the invention, the minimum input voltage Vmin is constant. In a further embodiment of the invention, the electronic circuit for controlling the string voltage is part of a larger electronic circuit, e.g., an inverter or microinverter.
Figures
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2019 008 062.9 | Nov 2019 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/DE2020/000250 | 10/17/2020 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2021/098895 | 5/27/2021 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20080143188 | Adest | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080198523 | Schmidt | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20120228947 | Noy | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120325288 | Jang | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130163137 | Johnston | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20180115275 | Flanigan | Apr 2018 | A1 |
20190036481 | Chapman | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190165193 | Han | May 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
102009051186 | May 2010 | DE |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230006606 A1 | Jan 2023 | US |