There are numerous methods available for battery charging. Battery lifetime is directly related to how “deep” a battery is cycled (charge/discharge) each time. To extend the life of a battery, it is important to maintain a light battery cycle (i.e. keep deep cycling to a minimum). Certain batteries have low duty-cycle applications where the battery power is required infrequently. Self-discharge of the battery can result in losing some, or most, of the overall capacity. Applying trickle-charging can prolong the battery lifetime and keep the full battery capacity ready for immediate application.
Trickle charging, also called float charging or slow charging, is a battery charging method to maintain a full capacity battery during self-discharge. A solar powered battery charger, producing clean and free energy when exposed to sunlight, can provide a low charging current over a long period of time to maintain the trickle charge cycle. However, if the trickle-charging rate is higher than the level of self-discharge, the battery can also be overcharged and cause possible damage or reduced lifetime. Most of the solar battery chargers currently available on the market lack battery overcharge protection. Battery charging systems that utilize solar power are found in patents U.S. Pat. No. 4,453,119 and U.S. Pat. No. 7,030,597. The published applications include US2006/0267543 and US2006/0028166.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,453,119 and US2006/0267543 demonstrate a solar charged battery integrated with a voltage regulation circuit to prevent the overcharge of a car battery. The drawback of this design is that it requires the solar module output voltage to be higher than the battery voltage. This requires that many solar cells have to be connected in series to build the required voltage. For example, to charge a 12V car battery, a typical solar charger is comprised of 42 small solar cells connected in series (as traditional mono- and poly-crystalline solar cells produce a maximum of 0.7V each—and often considerably less). Ideally, all series-connected cells should be the same size and have the same characteristics. Otherwise, the overall performance can be degraded due to one degraded cell affecting the entire module output. From a solar cell manufacturing perspective, the cutting of solar cells should be minimized to avoid quality concerns and improve processing costs.
In U.S. Pat. No. 7,030,597, a regular step-up converter is adopted to charge the battery and minimize the number of series-connected cells. The drawback is the existence of an inductor and the related magnetic design issues. The switching inductor is usually bulky, costly, and difficult for integrated circuits. This also causes electromagnetic interference (EMI) problems, which. can lead to human health issues and disturbances to other devices. The primary difference between U.S. Pat. No. 7,030,597 and the invention is the topology used for voltage conversion.
There is thus a need to provide a simple battery charger powered by solar that can reduce costs, eliminate EMI concerns and battery drainage, and effectively utilize solar module area. The battery charger of the invention provides a significant advantage by eliminating the inductor through the use of switched capacitor voltage converters. These are also called inductor-less DC/DC converter/regulators or charge pumps, which are capable of full integration. The circuit using switched capacitor voltage converters is simple and low cost when used with an integrated circuit. Integrated circuits (ICs) are readily available through many manufacturers, examples being Analog Device, Linear Technology, Texas Instruments, National Semiconductor, and Dallas Semiconductor. This invention also solves the complexity of providing a common ground, which limits the battery equal charge configurations. Moreover, since they require no external inductor, switched capacitor converters solve EMI issues related to inductor-based converters, as introduced in U.S. Pat. No. 7,030,597. Furthermore, the “boost” topology of this design results in a solar module output as low as 2V, which results in less cell cuts, fully utilized solar module area, and simple cell interconnection. Another advantage of this invention is that the battery overcharge problem can be avoided. The system does not drain power from the battery because the system power supply is controlled by the photovoltaic voltage. The system is automatically powered up when the photovoltaic power is available and is turned off when photovoltaic power is not available.
One drawback of using switched capacitor voltage converters is the limit of current output, typically less than 1 A. Unlike regular switching-mode converters, certain combinations limit the conversion ratio. Additionally, the resulting efficiency is usually lower than 90%. Despite these current disadvantages, switched capacitor voltage converters are still good alternatives for the application of a low-power solar battery charger.
In drawings that illustrate embodiments of the invention,
When solar power is available, the output voltage, Vo, should be higher than the battery voltage, Vbat. The capacity of photovoltaic power generation depends heavily on the presence of sunlight. At night, a current may flow back to the photovoltaic cells from devices that can supply electric power. This reverse current must be avoided because it can result in leakage loss, extensive damage, or even fire. The blocking device (300) should be used to prevent this reverse current flow.
In terms of maximum power point tracking, the regulation of photovoltaic voltage is required because there is an optimal operating voltage for each photovoltaic module. The voltage sensing unit (500) measures the photovoltaic voltage and feeds the signal to the voltage feedback and control unit (600). These two components will force the photovoltaic voltage to follow a predefined set-point, REF, which represents the maximum power point. This function will maximize the solar power output to charge the battery efficiently. The feedback and control unit compares the photovoltaic voltage and the reference REF, then, sends out the control signal to one of the switches. When the photovoltaic voltage is lower than the predefined reference, the switch will be turned off to increase the photovoltaic voltage. When the photovoltaic voltage is higher than the predefined reference, the photovoltaic voltage is not regulated, but, follow the change of the battery voltage, because the fixed conversion ratio of the switched capacitor voltage converter. Furthermore, this sensing and control functionality can serve as a voltage limiter to keep the photovoltaic voltage above a lower-limit, which deviates from the maximum power point.
When an integrated circuit, such as LT1054, is used, the configuration of the power interface can be very simple, as shown in
As shown in
The power interfaces can operate in parallel to increase the charging capacity, as shown in
As such, an invention has been disclosed in terms of preferred embodiments thereof which fulfills each and every one of the objects of the present invention as set forth above and provides a new and improved solar powered battery charger.
Of course, various changes, modifications and alterations from the teachings of the present invention may be contemplated by those skilled in the art without departing from the intended spirit and scope thereof. It is intended that the present invention only be limited by the terms of the appended claims.
This application claims priority from provisional patent application No. 60/974,242 filed on Sep. 21, 2007.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60974242 | Sep 2007 | US |