Not applicable.
Buccal formulations are more and more popular for drug administrations. They exhibit in fact several advantages in comparison with other solid dosage forms; in particular, buccal formulations dissolve in the oral cavity without requiring water for ingestion, allowing the buccal adsorption of drugs coming into contact with the oral mucosa in dissolved form. Sometimes, buccal administration does not unfortunately always allow to obtain a fast onset of action of the drug, as the result of difficulties of the drug to cross the skin barrier of mucosa and to penetrate into the blood stream.
The present invention concerns solid dosage formulations of narcotic drugs having improved buccal adsorption.
The formulations of the invention are characterized by the introduction in a buccal formulation of a pharmaceutically acceptable soluble organic compound having a primary, secondary or tertiary amine group, having a pK of about 8 or greater. Preferably, the in vivo disintegration time of tablets occurs in a time between about 5 and about 25 minutes.
Surprisingly, it has been found that adding a non-toxic or pharmaceutically acceptable amine to a buccal formulation, the penetration capacity of drugs is significantly improved, allowing to reach a higher and earlier blood concentration of the active ingredient in comparison with formulations without an amine as described herein.
Non-toxic amines having a pK of about 8 or greater which improve the bioavailability according to the invention belong to the following categories:
basic amino acids, such as Arginine, Lysine, Histidine, and Omithine;
tertiary amines, such as Triethanolamine, and Thromethamine;
aminosulfonic acids, such as Taurine;
mercapramines such as Cysteamine;
quaternary ammonium salts, such as Betaine;
heterocyclic amines, such as Pyrrolidine; and
Guanidines.
Arginine is a preferred non-toxic amine. The formulations of the invention may include a mixture of two or more of said amines. Preferably, the amine is not polyvinylpyrrolidone.
Examples of active components that may be advantageously formulated in solid dosage form according to the invention include:
Alfentanil, Buprenorphine, Butorphanol, Codeine, Diphenoxylate, Fentanyl, Heroin, Hydrocodone, Hydromorphone, Oxymorphone, Levophanol, Levallorphan, Loperamide, Meperidine, Morphine, Nalbuphine, Nalmefene, Nalorphine, Naloxone, Naltrexone, Remifentanyl, Sufentanyl and derivatives, salts and analogues thereof. Fentanyl is preferred. The invention further includes the use of pharmaceutically acceptable forms of the active ingredient, such as salts, hydrates, etc., for example, Fentanyl citrate.
Preferably, the amount of amine in respect to the active ingredient (molar ratio active ingredient:amine) ranges from about 5:1 to about 1000:1, preferably from about 10:1 to about 500:1, and most preferably from about 20:1 to about 250:1.
Preferably, the disintegration time in vivo ranges between about 2 and about 50 minutes, more preferably between about 5 and about 25 minutes.
It will be understood that the present formulations may additionally contain ingredients typically found in tablets intended for buccal administration, such as one or more of diluents, binders, lubricants, glidants, disintegrants, coloring agents, flavouring agents, etc. The tablets may be made by conventional techniques, including wet, dry or fluid-bed granulation methods, or direct compression. Preferably, the tablets are not lyophilized.
The invention is illustrated by the following non-limiting Examples:
Preparation of an Oral Dispersible Tablet Containing Amine (Arginine)
Oral dispersible tablets containing 200 mcg of Fentanyl were obtained as follows:
Preparation of an Oral Dispersable Tablet Without Amine
Oral dispersible tablets containing 400 mcg of Fentanyl have been obtained as follows:
A pharmacokinetic study was carried out on 6 fasting healthy volunteers treated with a buccal formulation prepared in accordance with example #1A containing 200 mcg of Fentanyl. The results were compared with a pharmacokinetic study carried out on 6 healthy volunteers treated with a buccal formulation prepared in accordance with example #1B containing 400 mcg of Fentanyl.
The results are reported in the following Table 1:
Despite the dose of Fentanyl administered in the tablets described in example #1A (200 mcg) being 50% of the dose described in example #1B (400 mcg), the pharmacokinetic parameters are similar, demonstrating a dramatic improvement of the Fentanyl bioavailability for the formulation of the invention.
A pharmacokinetic study was carried out on 6 fasting healthy volunteers treated with a buccal formulation prepared in accordance with example #1A containing 200 mcg of Fentanyl. The results were compared with a pharmacokinetic study carried out on 6 healthy volunteers treated with a buccal formulation commercially available (Actiq-commercialized by Cephalon, Inc., Salt Lake City, Utah 84116 USA) containing 200 mcg of Fentanyl.
The results are reported in the following Table 2:
Despite the dose of Fentanyl administered in the tablets described in example #1A (200 mcg) being equal to the dose of Actiq (200 mcg), the pharmacokinetic parameters are much higher, demonstrating a dramatic improvement of the Fentanyl bioavailability for the formulation of the invention.
This application is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 11/186,925 filed Jul. 22, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5464632 | Cousin et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5501861 | Makino et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5576014 | Mizumoto et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5624677 | El-Rashidy et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5720974 | Makino et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5785989 | Stanley et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5869098 | Misra et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5888534 | El-Rashidy et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5958453 | Ohno et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6024981 | Khankari et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6149938 | Bonadeo et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6200604 | Pather et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210699 | Acharya et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6221392 | Khankari et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6264981 | Zhang et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6316027 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6350470 | Pather et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6471991 | Robinson et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6509028 | Williams et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6680071 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6733781 | Abu-Izza et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6974590 | Pather et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
20010051186 | Acharya et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020013331 | Williams et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020192288 | Williams et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030082107 | Dugger, III | May 2003 | A1 |
20030104041 | Hsu et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030215502 | Pruss et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040253307 | Hague et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013857 | Fu et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10-095738 | Apr 1998 | JP |
2000-281589 | Oct 2000 | JP |
2004-089336 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Senal and Hincal, Permeation enhancement via buccal route: possibilities and limitations, Journal of Controlled Release, 72 (2001) 133-144. |
Rossi et al, Drug discovery today: technologies, vol. 2, No. 1, 2005, pp. 59-65. |
Zhang et al , Clinical pharmacokinetics , 2002: 41 (9): pp. 661-680. |
Office action and search report dated Mar. 29, 2012 from Japanese Patent Office for application serial No. 2008-521904, 3 pages. |
Streisand, J. B., et al., “Buccal absorption of fentanyl is pH-dependent in dogs,” Anesthesiology 1995, 82 (3):759-764. |
Letter of Examination Report dated Dec. 23, 2011, and a search report (English translation) for Taiwanese application No. 095126670, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070020187 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11186925 | Jul 2005 | US |
Child | 11490500 | US |