This application is a U.S. national stage entry under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of International Application No. PCT/EP2019/080674 filed Nov. 8, 2019, which claims priority to European patent application No. 18205752.1 filed on Nov. 12, 2018, the whole content of this application being incorporated herein by reference for all purposes.
The present invention pertains to a solid polymer electrolyte composition, in particular for use in lithium-ion batteries.
Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have seen an increasing development in the past years due to the rising interest in the commercialization of power tools, hybrid electric vehicles, electric vehicles for the automotive industry, and portable devices for daily lives.
The electrolyte is a critical component for long lifespan and high performances LIBs. The electrolyte should be able to provide suitable ionic conductivity and maintain good chemical stability and compatibility with electrode materials. For practical applications, the ionic conductivity of electrolytes must exceed 10−5 S/cm at room temperature. Furthermore, the electrolyte should have a Li+ transference number approaching unity to avoid concentration gradient during charge and discharge cycles.
Solid polymer electrolytes (SPEs)—which are solvent-free electrolytes based on polymers—are becoming increasingly attractive for use in next-generation LIBs, which currently contain a liquid electrolyte. Replacing the liquid electrolyte has several advantages: it allows use of higher-energy density solid lithium at the anode, removes toxic solvents, improves cycling ability, and eliminates the need for heavy casings. Despite the advantages of SPEs, their conductivity is not sufficient for use in batteries. As a result, considerable efforts towards improving their conductivity have taken place over the last 20 years.
SPEs are usually composed of two components, namely a polymer matrix and a lithium salt, which are the key factors that affect the ionic conductivity. High ionic conductivity is generally associated with the amorphous phase of the polymer matrix, which is in turn associated with its glass transition temperature (Tg).
The most performing lithium salt is lithium bis(trifluoromethane)sulfonimide (LiTFSI) thanks to its high solubility in the polymer matrix, ionic conductivity, electrochemical stability and dissociation level.
The ideal polymer matrix should have strong ability of solvating lithium ions, have a low Tg to remain rubbery at ambient temperature and possess limited crystallinity in the temperature range of operations to preserve a lithium ion conductivity substantially similar to that of the liquid electrolyte systems (10−3 S/cm).
Poly(ethylene oxide) (PEO) has been considered as the most promising polymer matrix thanks to its unique capacity to solvate lithium ions and a Tg as low as about −67° C. Due to the presence of crystalline domains in PEO below PEO crystalline melting point (about 65° C.), PEO-based SPEs can only operate at higher temperatures.
Extensive studies have been made for tuning the PEO-based electrolyte properties, providing more precise control of crystalline melting and glass transition temperature properties, increasing the lithium ion mobility and increasing the ionic conductivity in the temperature range of operation.
In this respect, numerous polyether-based crosslinked polymer electrolytes have been studied. For instance, US 2015/0288028 discloses a solid polymer comprising a cross-linked product of a crosslinkable perfluoropolyether (e.g. perfluoropolyether dimethacrylate, PFPE-DMA) and a crosslinkable PEO (e.g. poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate, PEO-DMA) and a lithium salt dissolved in said polymer for use in LIBs.
However, said polymer did not show appreciable ionic conductivity and batteries using said polymer did not reveal to be performing enough.
Need is therefore felt to provide SPEs possessing improved ionic conductivity in the temperature range of operation and also providing good performances of the LIBs, in particular in terms of specific discharge capacity.
In a first aspect, the present invention relates to a solid electrolyte composition [composition (C)] comprising:
In a second aspect, the present invention relates to a method for making the above composition (C), said method comprising:
In a third aspect, the present invention relates to a method for making the above composition (C), said method comprising:
In a further aspect, the present invention relates to a lithium-ion battery (LIB) comprising at least one anode, at least one cathode and a solid electrolyte comprising, preferably consisting of, composition (C) as defined above.
The Applicant has surprisingly found that composition (C) of the invention provides an outstanding ionic conductivity and a significant specific discharge capacity of the LIBs, which are much higher than the prior art crosslinked polyether-based crosslinked electrolytes.
In the present description, unless otherwise indicated, the following terms are to be meant as follows.
The term “(per)fluoropolyether” is intended to indicate fully or partially fluorinated polyether polymers.
The acronym “PFPE” stands for “(per)fluoropolyether” and, when used as substantive, is intended to mean either the singular or the plural form, depending on the context.
The acronym “PEO” stands for “polyethylene oxide”.
The expression “EO:Li ratio” is intended to indicate the molar ratio between the repeating units in the poly(alkylene oxide), e.g. ethylene oxide moieties, and the lithium ions.
The expression “average functionality (F)” denotes the average number of functional groups per polymer molecule and can be calculated according to methods known in the art.
In the present description, the use of parentheses “( . . . )” before and after the names of compounds, symbols or numbers identifying formulae or parts of formulae, such as “composition (C)”, has the mere purpose of better distinguishing those names, symbols or numbers from the remaining text; thus, said parentheses could also be omitted.
Preferably, said chain (Rpf) is a chain of formula (II):
—O-D-(CFX#)z1—O(Rf)(CFX*)z2-D*-O— (II)
Preferably, z1 and z2, equal or different from each other, are integers from 1 to 10, more preferably from 1 to 6 and even more preferably from 1 to 3.
Preferably, D and D*, equal or different from each other, are chains of formula —CH2—, —CH2CH2— or —CH(CF3)—.
Preferably, said chain (Rf) complies with the following formula:
—[(CFX1O)g1(CFX2CFX3O)g2(CF2CF2CF2O)g3(CF2CF2CF2CF2O)g4]— (Rf-I)
More preferably, said chain (Rf) is selected from chains of formula:
—[(CF2CF2O)a1(CF2O)a2]— (Rf-IIA)
Still more preferably, said chain (Rf) complies with formula (Rf-III) here below:
—[(CF2CF2O)a1(CF2O)a2]— (Rf-III)
Preferably, in the at least one chain end of formula (I), na+na′ is from 1 to 45, more preferably from 4 to 45, even more preferably from 4 to 30. Preferred embodiments are those wherein na+na′ is from 4 to 15.
More preferably, said at least one chain end complies with one of the following formulae (I-a), (I-b), (I-c):
—(CH2CH2O)j1—H (I-a)
—[CH2CH(CH3)O]j2—H (I-b)
—[(CH2CH2O)j3—(CH2CH(CH3)O)j4]j(x)—H (I-c)
The recurring units having j3 and j4 as indexes can be either randomly distributed or they can be arranged to form blocks.
Said PFPEs are commercially available from Solvay Specialty Polymers (Italy) and can be obtained according to the method disclosed in WO 2014/090649 (SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS ITALY S.P.A.).
According to a preferred embodiment, the chains of the poly(alkylene oxide) have formula (II-A):
CH3—[OCH2CH2]n1—OCH3 (II-A)
According to another embodiment, the chains of the poly(alkylene oxide) have formula (II-B):
CH3—(C3H6O)nP(CH2CH2O)nE—OCH3 (II-B)
Preferably, said at least one lithium salt is selected from the group comprising: LiPF6, LiBF4, LiClO4, lithium bis(oxalato)borate (“LiBOB”), LiN(CF3SO2)2 (“LiTFSI”), LiN(C2F6SO2)2, M[N(CF3SO2)(RFSO2)]n with RF being C2F6, C4F9, CF3OCF2CF2, LiAsF6, LiC(CF3SO2)3, 4,5-dicyano-2-(trifluoromethyl) imidazole (“LiTDI”), and combinations or mixtures thereof. More preferably, said lithium salt is LiN(CF3SO2)2 (“LiTFSI”).
Composition (C) comprises said at least one lithium salt in an amount preferably ranging from 5 to 30 wt. %, more preferably from 10 to 30 wt. %, even more preferably from 15 to 30 wt. %.
Composition (C) comprises said at least one PFPE in an amount preferably ranging from 10 to 50 wt. %, more preferably from 15 to 40 wt. %, even more preferably from 15 to 30 wt. %.
The concentration of the at least one lithium salt in said composition (C) is expressed in terms of EO:Li+ ratio. Said EO:Li+ ratio preferably ranges from 10:1 to 30:1, more preferably from 15:1 to 20:1.
As said, the present invention also relates to a lithium ion battery comprising at least one anode, at least one cathode and a solid electrolyte comprising, preferably consisting of, the above identified composition (C).
Suitable active materials for the anode (negative electrode) are selected from the group consisting of:
The anode may contain additives as will be familiar to those skilled in the art. Among them, mention can be made notably of carbon black, graphene or carbon nanotubes. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the negative electrode may be in any convenient form including foils, plates, rods, pastes or as a composite made by forming a coating of the negative electrode material on a conductive current collector or other suitable support.
Representative cathode (positive electrode) materials for lithium batteries include composites comprising a polymer binder (PB), a powdery electrode material, an electroconductivity-imparting additive and, optionally, a viscosity modifying agent. Said electroconductivity-imparting additive may be selected among: carbonaceous materials, such as carbon black, graphite fine powder and fiber, and fine powder and fiber of metals, such as nickel and aluminum.
The active material for the positive electrode preferably comprises a composite metal chalcogenide represented by a general formula of LiMY2, wherein M denotes at least one species of transition metals such as Co, Ni, Fe, Mn, Cr and V; and Y denotes a chalcogen, such as O or S. Among these, it is preferred to use a lithium-based composite metal oxide represented by a general formula of LiMO2, wherein M is the same as above. Preferred examples thereof may include: LiCoO2, LiNiO1-xO2 (0<x<1), and spinel-structured LiMn2O4.
As an alternative, the active material may comprise a lithiated or partially lithiated transition metal oxyanion-based electro-active material of formula
M1M2(JO4)fE1-f,
The M1M2(JO4)fE1-f electro-active material as defined above is preferably phosphate-based and may have an ordered or modified olivine structure.
More preferably, the active material is a phosphate-based electro-active material of formula Li(FexMn1-x)PO4 wherein 0≤x≤1, wherein x is preferably 1 (i.e. lithium iron phosphate of formula LiFePO4).
As per the polymer binder (PB), polymers well known in the art can be used including, preferably, vinylidene fluoride (VDF) polymers.
Should the disclosure of any patents, patent applications and publications which are incorporated herein by reference conflict with the description of the present application to the extent that it may render a term unclear, the present description shall take precedence.
The invention will be herein after illustrated in greater detail by means of the Examples contained in the following Experimental Section; the Examples are merely illustrative and are by no means to be interpreted as limiting the scope of the invention.
Materials
Lithium bis(trifluoromethan)sulfonimide (LiTFSI) was obtained from Special Chem.
Poly(ethylenoxide) (PEO): CH3—[OCH2CH2]n1—OCH3 (with n1 being an integer such that a) Mn=150′000 and b) Mn=15′000) was obtained from Mesei Chem.
PFPE(I) complying with formula:
HO(CH2CH2O)j1CH2CF2O(CF2CF2O)a1(CF2O)a2CF2CH2(OCH2CH2)j1OH
PFPE(II) complying with formula:
HO(CH(CH3)CH2O)j2(CH2CH2O)j1CH2CF2O(CF2CF2O)a1(CF2O)a2CF2CH2(OCH2CH2)r(OCH2CH(CH3))j2OH
PFPE(III) complying with formula:
CH2═CH—CO—O(CH2CH2O)qCH2CF2O(CF2CF2O)m(CF2O)nCF2CH2(OCH2CH2)q—CO—CH═CH2
PEO (Mn 150′000), PFPE(I) and PFPE(II) were dried overnight at 55° C. under vacuum and were stored in a dry glove box.
LiTFSI was mixed with PFPE(I) or PFPE(II), according to different examples, in a beaker inside the glove box, obtaining a first mixture. Then, PEO was added to said first mixture and mixed with a spatula, thus enabling the magnetic stirring of the powders and obtaining a second mixture.
Said second mixture was heated at 80° C. for 1-2 hours until melting, mechanically mixed in a mortar twice and then cooled, obtaining a white and flexible paste.
Said paste was pressed at 60° C. and 20 bar for 15 minutes between two Haler® foils, thus obtaining a membrane with a thickness of between 175 and 190 μm.
The following membranes 1A and 1B were obtained:
PFPE(III), PEO (Mn 15′000) and LiTFSI were dried overnight at 55° C. under vacuum and were stored in a dry glove box.
LiTFSI was mixed with PFPE(III) in a beaker inside the glove box, obtaining a first mixture. Then, PEO was added to said first mixture and mixed with a spatula, thus enabling the magnetic stirring of the powders and obtaining a second mixture.
Said second mixture was heated at 60-70° C. for at least 3 hours until melting and then mechanically mixed twice in a mortar, thus obtaining a homogeneous solution.
While still hot, said solution was pressed at 70° C., 20 bar for 15 minutes between 2 Halar foils separated by a tape-made spacer, thus obtaining a membrane with a thickness raging between 120 and 160 μm.
Said membrane was cooled at room temperature, then mixed with one or more photo-initiators and subsequently subjected to UV-curing under a continuous flow of nitrogen.
By varying the photo-initiator and the UV time, i.e. the time of exposure of the membranes to UV light, the following cross-linked membranes 2A to 2C were obtained.
(*) Dar: Darocur 1173/BP: Benzophenone
Ionic Conductivity
Table 3 shows the values of ionic conductivity at 80° C. (σ80) of the membranes of example 1 and the membranes of example 2 of comparison.
The above results show that membranes 1A and 1B provide a significantly higher ionic conductivity than membranes 2A-2C.
Specific Discharge Capacity
Membranes 1A, 1B and 2C were tested in a Li/electrolyte/LiFePO4 battery. The parameters used were the following: temperature of 80° C., discharge rate of 2D, cathode capacity of 0.33 mAh, cathode composition 70% (wt) LiFePO4, 20% (wt) carbon black and 10% (wt) PVDF, and loading of about 2 mg/cm2.
Table 4 shows the values of the specific discharge capacity at 2D average on 20 cycles.
From the above values, it results that batteries prepared with membranes 1A and 1B show much better performances than batteries prepared with cross-linked membranes, such as membrane 2C.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
18205752 | Nov 2018 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2019/080674 | 11/8/2019 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2020/099261 | 5/22/2020 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6203944 | Turner et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
20150288028 | DeSimone | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150329453 | Guarda et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20180323470 | Yang et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004022504 | Jan 2004 | JP |
WO2018015417 | Jan 2018 | JP |
2000003444 | Jan 2000 | WO |
2014090649 | Jun 2014 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210408589 A1 | Dec 2021 | US |