Concentrating Solar power (CSP) systems utilize solar energy to drive a thermal power cycle for the generation of electricity. CSP technologies include parabolic trough, linear Fresnel, central receiver or “power tower,” and dish/engine systems. Considerable interest in CSP has been driven by renewable energy portfolio standards applicable to energy providers in the southwestern United States and renewable energy feed-in tariffs in Spain. CSP systems are typically deployed as large, centralized power plants to take advantage of economies of scale. A key advantage of certain CSP systems, in particular parabolic troughs and power towers, is the ability to incorporate thermal energy storage. Thermal energy storage is often less expensive and more efficient than electric storage and allows CSP plants to increase capacity factor and dispatch power as needed—for example, to cover evening or other demand peaks. Improved plant structural designs are needed, however, to support improvements in CSP systems utilizing thermal energy storage.
The foregoing examples of the related art and limitations related therewith are intended to be illustrative and not exclusive. Other limitations of the related art will become apparent to those of skill in the art upon a reading of the specification and a study of the drawings.
Exemplary embodiments are illustrated in referenced figures of the drawings. It is intended that the embodiments and figures disclosed herein are to be considered illustrative rather than limiting.
In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown by way of illustration specific illustrative embodiments. However, it is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense.
The exemplary storage silo 100 in
In the examples described herein, the diameter 103 is measured from the center of the wall of the cylinder 104. For example, in this embodiment, the cylinder 104 is comprised of a wall having a thickness of approximately 12 inches. The diameter 103 is, therefore, measured from a point six inches deep into the wall of the cylinder 104 in this example. However, it is to be understood that other thicknesses of the wall can be used in other embodiments and that the diameter can be measured from an inner surface or exterior surface of the wall of the cylinder 104. Table 1 provides exemplary values for the height, diameter, and corresponding storage capacity of solid particles. It is to be understood that the values in Table 1 are provided by way of example only and that other dimensions can be used in other embodiments. For example, in some embodiments, a height-to-diameter ratio of approximately 3:1 is used in determining the dimensions of the silo.
In this example, a cover or dome 106 is optionally located at one end of the cylinder 104 to enclose the volume defined by the cylinder 104 at the end of the cylinder 104. The cover 106 is comprised of the same material as the cylinder 104. For example, in this embodiment, the cover 106 and cylinder 104 are comprised of steel-reinforced concrete, as described in more detail below. The foundation 102 is located at the end of the cylinder 104 opposite from the cover 106. The foundation 102 includes a plurality of micropile units 108. Each micropile unit 108 includes a plurality of micropile columns 109 and a footing or block 111 surrounding one end of the respective micropile columns. The micropile columns 109 have a length 110 which extends into the ground or soil 116. In this embodiment, the length 110 of the micropile units 108 is 50 feet. However, it is to be understood that the length 110 can be different in other embodiments. Additionally, all of the micropile units 108 do not, or may not have the same length in other embodiments. The micropile units 108 are used to anchor the foundation 102 and stabilize against seismic and surcharge loads from the earth as described in more detail below. The foundation 102 also includes a slab or base 112 having a thickness 114 placed on top of the footings 111.
In some embodiments, the slab 112 is at least partially submerged in the soil 116. In addition, the thickness 114, in some embodiments, is 18 inches. However, other thickness can be used in other embodiments. The base 112 is concentric with the cylinder 104. As measured from the center of the base 112, the base 112 has the same wall-center to wall-center diameter as the cylinder 104 in this example. However, the base 112 may have a wider outside diameter than the cylinder 104, as shown in this example. The micropile units 108 are formed in a pattern and are located under the wall of the cylinder 104. For example,
As can be seen, each exemplary layout includes a plurality of rows of micropile units 208. The number of rows and the number of micropile units 208 in each row depends on the maximum load or weight to be supported by the corresponding silo. Hence, as the diameter of the corresponding silo and foundation base 212 increases, the maximum load to be supported also increases. Hence, the number of micropile units 208 is also increased accordingly.
For example, in
An exemplary micropile column 409 is depicted in
In some embodiments, #10 rebar having a diameter of 1.25 inches is used. However, in other embodiments, vertical rebar 520 having other sizes are used. In the examples shown in
In
In
As shown in Table 3, as the size of the corresponding silo increases, the number of strands, per ton of material, in each strand bundle decreases. For example, the number of strands in each bundle 560 for a silo size of 6,250 tons is 5. If the same number of strands, per ton of material, in each strand bundle 560 was used for a silo size of 12,500 tons, then each strand bundle 560 would have 10 strands. However, as shown in the exemplary Table 3, the number of strands, per ton of material, in each strand bundle 560 is 6 for a silo size of 12,500 tons. Thus, the cost for horizontal reinforcement per ton of material contained decreases as the silo size increases. As a result, the cost of a post-tension strand horizontally reinforced silo may be up to 10% lower than the cost of a steel-rebar horizontally reinforced silo due to savings on the material.
Each strand bundle 560 is separated vertically from other strand bundles 560 by a vertical separation distance 565. In some embodiments, the vertical separation distance 565 is uniform throughout the silo. However, in other embodiments, the vertical separation distance 565 varies as a function of height. That is, the vertical separation distance 565 has an initial value at the end of the silo cylinder near the foundation and a second final value at the opposite end of the silo cylinder. For example, in some such embodiments, the vertical separation distance 565 between two strand bundles 560 near the cover of the silo is greater than the vertical separation distance 565 in the middle of the silo which, in turn, is greater than the vertical separation distance 565 near the foundation of the silo. In other words, the vertical separation distance 565 for a given strand bundle 560 increases as the respective height of the given strand bundle 560 increases. The vertical separation distance 565 can increase with height in some embodiments because the load due to the stored solid particles decreases with height. In some embodiments, the initial vertical separation distance 565 at the foundation of the silo is approximately 12 inches and increases with height. For example, in one embodiment, the separation distance 565 between strand bundles 560 is 12 inches near the bottom of the silo and changes proportionally to 20 inches near the top.
The silo structure described above can be implemented in a concentrating solar power plant, such as the exemplary power plant 700 shown in
The combined sunlight reflected from the plurality of heliostats 703 in the array 702 provides temperatures of approximately 500-1000° C. at the receiver 704. The receiver 704 is configured to transfer the solar heat from the combined sunlight to a heat transport material adapted to store thermal energy such as molten salts or other particles. The heated particles are passed from the receiver 704 to a hot silo 706. The hot silo 706 is implemented using a silo construction as described above with respect to
Heated particles from the hot silo 706 are delivered via a conveyor 708 to a heat exchanger 710 as needed. In this embodiment, the heat exchanger 710 is implemented as a fluidized-bed heat exchanger having three stages. In particular, the heat exchanger 710 includes a super heater 711, an evaporator 713, and a preheater/economizer 715. However, it is to be understood that other types and configurations of heat exchangers can be implemented in other embodiments.
A pump 712 compresses gas and delivers the compressed gas to the heat exchanger 710 where the pressure of the compressed gas suspends the heated particles in the gas. The fluidized mixture of compressed gas and heated particles is moved through the stages of the heat exchanger 710 to transfer heat from the heated particles to a working fluid, such as but not limited to water or ammonia. It is to be understood that, in other embodiments, other working fluids can be used. For example, other working fluids include, but are not limited to, hydrocarbons (e.g., butane, propane, propylene, etc.) and liquid fluorocarbons (e.g., tetrafluoroethane).
The transfer of heat to the working fluid vaporizes the working fluid. The vaporized working fluid is passed to a vapor turbine 714. The pressure of the vapor turns the vapor turbine 714, which is coupled to and drives the generator 716 to produce electricity. The vaporized working fluid is then expelled from the vapor turbine 714 and condensed again in condenser 718. In particular, the remaining heat from the vaporized working fluid is transferred to a cooler 720 coupled to the condenser 718. The removal of heat from the vaporized working fluid causes the working fluid to condense to a liquid state. A pump 722 is then used to move the working fluid back into the heat exchanger 710 where it is vaporized by the transfer of heat from the heated particles occurring in the heat exchanger 710.
After the particles pass through the heat exchanger 710, the resulting fluidized mixture is then passed to a cyclone 724 (also referred to as a particle separator). In the cyclone 724, the solid state particles are separated from the gas particles. The solid particles are then stored in a cold silo 726 for later use. The cold silo 726 is also constructed using the silo structures discussed above with respect to
While a number of exemplary aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, those of skill in the art will recognize certain modifications, permutations, additions and sub combinations thereof. It is therefore intended that the following appended claims and claims hereafter introduced are interpreted to include all such modifications, permutations, additions and sub-combinations as are within their true spirit and scope.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of: U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/715,747 entitled “Solid Particle Thermal Energy Storage Design For A Fluidized-Bed Concentrating Solar Power Plant” and filed on Oct. 18, 2012, (Applicant Docket No. NREL PROV/12-73) , which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/619,317 entitled “Gas-Solid Two-Phase Heat Transfer Material CSP Systems and Methods” and filed on Apr. 2, 2012, (Applicant Docket No. NREL PROV/11-92) which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety; U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/715,751 entitled “Fluidized-Bed Heat Exchanger Designs for Different Power Cycle in Power Tower Concentrating Solar Power Plant with Particle Receiver and Solid Thermal Energy Storage”, filed on Oct. 18, 2012, (Applicant Docket NREL PROV/12-74), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety; and U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/715,755, entitled “Enclosed Particle Receiver Design for a Fluidized Bed in Power Tower Concentrating Solar Power Plant”, filed on Oct. 18, 2012, (Applicant Docket NREL PROV/13-05), which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Attorney Docket No. NREL 12-73 1
The United States Government has rights in this invention under Contract No. DE-AC36-08G028308 between the United States Department of Energy and the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, the Manager and Operator of the National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61715747 | Oct 2012 | US | |
61619317 | Apr 2012 | US | |
61715751 | Oct 2012 | US | |
61715755 | Oct 2012 | US |