Solid pharmaceutical dosage form and a method for reducing abrasion

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 5436011
  • Patent Number
    5,436,011
  • Date Filed
    Friday, April 16, 1993
    31 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, July 25, 1995
    29 years ago
Abstract
A method for reducing abrasion during film coating of susceptible solid dosage forms by applying to an uncoated dosage form, a subcoat containing a pharmaceutically acceptable polyalkylene glycol and the resulting solid pharmaceutical dosage form.
Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a method for reducing abrasion of a solid pharmaceutical dosage form by applying to an uncoated dosage form a subcoat comprising an amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable polyalkylene glycol sufficient to reduce abrasion, and to the resulting solid pharmaceutical dosage form.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, a method is disclosed for reducing abrasion of a solid pharmaceutical dosage form subject to abrasion during the coating process. The process comprises applying to an uncoated dosage form a subcoat comprising an amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable polyalkylene glycol coating effective to reduce abrasion. The term "polyalkylene" refers to polymerized alkylenes, such as polyethylene, polypropylene and polybutylene.
The subcoat is applied from an aqueous solution which comprises about a 1 to 50% w/w or preferably 5 to 20% w/w of a polyalkylene glycol such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) having a molecular weight between about 4,000 to 10,000, preferably between about 6,000 to about 8,000. The amount of the subcoat is such that it is sufficient to reduce the abrasion compared to solid pharmaceutical dosage forms not having said subcoat. Abrasion as used hereto means any type of roughening or eroding of the surface of the solid dosage form. Generally, a dry weight of subcoat between 0.02% to about 0.5% w/w of the uncoated tablet is sufficient to reduce abrasion. Preferably, the dry weight of subcoat is about 0.1% w/w of the uncoated tablet.
Any conventional method of applying the subcoat may be utilized. For example the subcoat solution may be sprayed onto the solid pharmaceutical dosage form for between about 0.5 to 5 minutes. Other methods for applying the subcoat include fluid bed coating and a rotary granulator process. An exemplary method employing a conventional coating pan with baffles and conditions for applying the subcoat are as follows:
______________________________________Spray rate 40-45 g/minTotal coating time 2 to 10 min.Solution volume 90 to 150 mLDrum rotation speed 9 to 20 rpmAir inlet temperature 60-65.degree. C.Air exhaust temperature 45-50.degree. C.______________________________________
Once the subcoat has been applied, any other conventional coating for example, prolonged release, enteric coating and the like, may be applied as known in the art.
The subcoat is such that the absorption characteristics of the coated dosage form are substantially the same as those of the dosage form prior to coating.
The process of the instant invention is useful for tablets having an abrasive type nature such that the tablet surface roughens and erodes as the tablets are being coated. Examples of such tablets include formulations of verapamil, diflunisal, erythromycin and propranolol. However, it is within the scope of this invention that any solid dosage form prone to abrasion may be coated as disclosed herein to reduce abrasion prior to applying a conventional coat.
The following examples and preparations describe the manner and process of making and using the preferred embodiments of the invention and are illustrative rather than limiting. It should be understood that there may be other embodiments which fall within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims appended hereto.





Example 1
A 10% solution of a subcoat was prepared by mixing 0.1 kg of polyethylene glycol 8000 with 0.9 kg of purified water.
Example 2
Following the procedure of Example 1. a subcoat having the below ingredients was prepared:
______________________________________Polyethylene glycol 6000 0.1 kgPurified water 0.9 kg______________________________________
Example 3
Following the procedure of Example 1, a subcoat having the below ingredients was prepared:
______________________________________Polyethylene glycol 4000 0.1 kgPurified water 0.9 kg______________________________________
Example 4
Following the procedure of Example 1, a subcoat having the below ingredients was prepared:
______________________________________Polyethylene glycol 8000 0.15 kgPurified water 0.85 kg______________________________________
Example 5
Following the procedure of Example 1, a subcoat having the below ingredients was prepared:
______________________________________Polyethylene glycol 8000 0.20 kgPurified water 0.80 kg______________________________________
Example 6
A tablet having the below composition was coated with the subcoat of Example 1 such that the coating was about 0.1% w/w (dry) of the tablet:
______________________________________ AMOUNTCOMPOSITION mg/tablet______________________________________Verapamil hydrochloride USP 80.0Lactose N.F. 35.8Microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH101) 110.0Povidone USP (Polyvinylpyrollidone K30) 3.0Croscarmellose sodium, NF, type A (Ac-Di-Sol) 10.0Magnesium stearate N.F. 1.2Total (dry weight) 240.0______________________________________
This subcoat was applied using the following coating conditions:
______________________________________Inlet air temperature 60.degree. C.Exhaust air temperature 50.degree. C.Bed temperature 45.degree. C.Drying air volume 5.1 m.sup.3 /minAtomizing air pressure 60 psiSpray rate 40 g min.sup.-1Tablet load 9 kg______________________________________
Example 7
The tablets having the below compositions were coated with the subcoat of Example 2 such that the coating was about 0.1% w/w (dry) of the tablet:
______________________________________ AMOUNT mg/tabletCOMPOSITION 250 mg 500 mg______________________________________Diflunisal USP 250.00 500.00Pregelatinized starch 1500 NF 89.00 178.00Sodium starch glycollate NF 8.00 16.00Microcrystalline cellulose NF 40.00 80.00Hydroxypropyl cellulose NF 8.00 16.00(Klucel EF)Magnesium stearate NF 5.00 10.00Total (dry weight) 400.00 800.00______________________________________
Claims
  • 1. A method for reducing abrasion of a tablet dosage form subject to abrasion during coating, comprising applying to an uncoated dosage form a subcoat consisting of an amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable polyalkylene glycol coating effective to reduce abrasion.
  • 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the drug release characteristics of the coated tablet including the subcoat are the same as the tablet dosage form without the subcoat.
  • 3. The method as recited in claim 1, whereto the polyalkylene glycol is polyethylene glycol.
  • 4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a molecular weight of between about 6,000 to about 8,000.
  • 5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the polyalkylene glycol has a molecular weight of between about 4,000 to 10,000.
  • 6. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein the molecular weight is between about 6,000 to about 8,000.
  • 7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the polyalkylene glycol is applied as an aqueous solution.
  • 8. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the subcoat comprises about a 1 to 50% w/w aqueous solution of the polyalkylene glycol,
  • 9. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the subcoat comprises about a 5 to 20% w/w aqueous solution of the pglyalkylene glycol.
US Referenced Citations (20)
Number Name Date Kind
3097144 Banker Jul 1963
3149039 Jeffries Sep 1964
3149041 Jeffries Sep 1964
3379554 Brindamour Apr 1968
3383237 Tuerck May 1968
3533804 Bennett Feb 1968
3629394 Gaunt et al. Feb 1969
3751277 Small et al. Aug 1973
3802896 Westall et al. May 1974
3908003 Ley et al. Jul 1974
4330338 Banker Oct 1978
4423027 Simon et al. Dec 1982
4482387 Wood et al. Nov 1983
4520009 Dunn Nov 1983
4629620 Lindahl et al. Jul 1984
4687660 Baker et al. Aug 1984
4775536 Patell Feb 1986
4795644 Zentner Aug 1987
4816259 Matthews et al. Feb 1987
4857337 Miller et al. May 1988
Foreign Referenced Citations (56)
Number Date Country
4033064 Aug 1965 AUX
8546934 Sep 1985 AUX
8825946 Nov 1987 AUX
609248 BEX
717236 Dec 1968 BEX
865633 Apr 1977 BEX
896483 Apr 1983 BEX
122463 Mar 1983 EPX
0133827 Mar 1985 EPX
238951 Mar 1986 EPX
0409432 Jan 1991 EPX
0572942 Dec 1993 EPX
1483990 May 1966 FRX
2293438 Dec 1974 FRX
1617328 Jul 1966 DEX
2058163 Dec 1969 DEX
2522483 May 1975 DEX
3636123 Oct 1986 DEX
43165 May 1964 IEX
815065 Dec 1962 JPX
29369 Jan 1965 JPX
7037796 Mar 1965 JPX
2667769 Jul 1966 JPX
2704069 Dec 1966 JPX
7001076 Aug 1967 JPX
179335 Sep 1975 JPX
128512 Oct 1976 JPX
095867 Aug 1977 JPX
047058 Apr 1978 JPX
134868 Oct 1978 JPX
140349 Oct 1979 JPX
124349 Sep 1980 JPX
137936 Oct 1980 JPX
149000 Sep 1981 JPX
024534 Feb 1986 JPX
051377 Mar 1986 JPX
246391 Oct 1986 JPX
161209 Jun 1987 JPX
025341 Feb 1988 JPX
6903248 Nov 1968 NGX
624145 Oct 1961 ZAX
650221 Jan 1964 ZAX
655967 Dec 1964 ZAX
8500209 Jul 1984 ZAX
872146 Jan 1958 GBX
887682 Oct 1958 GBX
907309 Feb 1959 GBX
907310 Feb 1959 GBX
2025227 Jul 1978 GBX
1544761 Apr 1979 GBX
1598458 Sep 1981 GBX
1091930 Nov 1981 SUX
WO8400296 Jul 1982 WOX
WO8501207 Sep 1983 WOX
WO8604817 Feb 1985 WOX
WO8707902 Jun 1986 WOX