Information
-
Patent Grant
-
5436011
-
Patent Number
5,436,011
-
Date Filed
Friday, April 16, 199331 years ago
-
Date Issued
Tuesday, July 25, 199529 years ago
-
Inventors
-
Original Assignees
-
Examiners
Agents
-
CPC
-
US Classifications
Field of Search
US
- 424 480
- 424 482
- 424 497
- 424 498
- 427 214
- 427 215
- 427 218
-
International Classifications
-
Abstract
A method for reducing abrasion during film coating of susceptible solid dosage forms by applying to an uncoated dosage form, a subcoat containing a pharmaceutically acceptable polyalkylene glycol and the resulting solid pharmaceutical dosage form.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is directed to a method for reducing abrasion of a solid pharmaceutical dosage form by applying to an uncoated dosage form a subcoat comprising an amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable polyalkylene glycol sufficient to reduce abrasion, and to the resulting solid pharmaceutical dosage form.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
In accordance with the present invention, a method is disclosed for reducing abrasion of a solid pharmaceutical dosage form subject to abrasion during the coating process. The process comprises applying to an uncoated dosage form a subcoat comprising an amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable polyalkylene glycol coating effective to reduce abrasion. The term "polyalkylene" refers to polymerized alkylenes, such as polyethylene, polypropylene and polybutylene.
The subcoat is applied from an aqueous solution which comprises about a 1 to 50% w/w or preferably 5 to 20% w/w of a polyalkylene glycol such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) having a molecular weight between about 4,000 to 10,000, preferably between about 6,000 to about 8,000. The amount of the subcoat is such that it is sufficient to reduce the abrasion compared to solid pharmaceutical dosage forms not having said subcoat. Abrasion as used hereto means any type of roughening or eroding of the surface of the solid dosage form. Generally, a dry weight of subcoat between 0.02% to about 0.5% w/w of the uncoated tablet is sufficient to reduce abrasion. Preferably, the dry weight of subcoat is about 0.1% w/w of the uncoated tablet.
Any conventional method of applying the subcoat may be utilized. For example the subcoat solution may be sprayed onto the solid pharmaceutical dosage form for between about 0.5 to 5 minutes. Other methods for applying the subcoat include fluid bed coating and a rotary granulator process. An exemplary method employing a conventional coating pan with baffles and conditions for applying the subcoat are as follows:
______________________________________Spray rate 40-45 g/minTotal coating time 2 to 10 min.Solution volume 90 to 150 mLDrum rotation speed 9 to 20 rpmAir inlet temperature 60-65.degree. C.Air exhaust temperature 45-50.degree. C.______________________________________
Once the subcoat has been applied, any other conventional coating for example, prolonged release, enteric coating and the like, may be applied as known in the art.
The subcoat is such that the absorption characteristics of the coated dosage form are substantially the same as those of the dosage form prior to coating.
The process of the instant invention is useful for tablets having an abrasive type nature such that the tablet surface roughens and erodes as the tablets are being coated. Examples of such tablets include formulations of verapamil, diflunisal, erythromycin and propranolol. However, it is within the scope of this invention that any solid dosage form prone to abrasion may be coated as disclosed herein to reduce abrasion prior to applying a conventional coat.
The following examples and preparations describe the manner and process of making and using the preferred embodiments of the invention and are illustrative rather than limiting. It should be understood that there may be other embodiments which fall within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims appended hereto.
Example 1
A 10% solution of a subcoat was prepared by mixing 0.1 kg of polyethylene glycol 8000 with 0.9 kg of purified water.
Example 2
Following the procedure of Example 1. a subcoat having the below ingredients was prepared:
______________________________________Polyethylene glycol 6000 0.1 kgPurified water 0.9 kg______________________________________
Example 3
Following the procedure of Example 1, a subcoat having the below ingredients was prepared:
______________________________________Polyethylene glycol 4000 0.1 kgPurified water 0.9 kg______________________________________
Example 4
Following the procedure of Example 1, a subcoat having the below ingredients was prepared:
______________________________________Polyethylene glycol 8000 0.15 kgPurified water 0.85 kg______________________________________
Example 5
Following the procedure of Example 1, a subcoat having the below ingredients was prepared:
______________________________________Polyethylene glycol 8000 0.20 kgPurified water 0.80 kg______________________________________
Example 6
A tablet having the below composition was coated with the subcoat of Example 1 such that the coating was about 0.1% w/w (dry) of the tablet:
______________________________________ AMOUNTCOMPOSITION mg/tablet______________________________________Verapamil hydrochloride USP 80.0Lactose N.F. 35.8Microcrystalline cellulose (Avicel PH101) 110.0Povidone USP (Polyvinylpyrollidone K30) 3.0Croscarmellose sodium, NF, type A (Ac-Di-Sol) 10.0Magnesium stearate N.F. 1.2Total (dry weight) 240.0______________________________________
This subcoat was applied using the following coating conditions:
______________________________________Inlet air temperature 60.degree. C.Exhaust air temperature 50.degree. C.Bed temperature 45.degree. C.Drying air volume 5.1 m.sup.3 /minAtomizing air pressure 60 psiSpray rate 40 g min.sup.-1Tablet load 9 kg______________________________________
Example 7
The tablets having the below compositions were coated with the subcoat of Example 2 such that the coating was about 0.1% w/w (dry) of the tablet:
______________________________________ AMOUNT mg/tabletCOMPOSITION 250 mg 500 mg______________________________________Diflunisal USP 250.00 500.00Pregelatinized starch 1500 NF 89.00 178.00Sodium starch glycollate NF 8.00 16.00Microcrystalline cellulose NF 40.00 80.00Hydroxypropyl cellulose NF 8.00 16.00(Klucel EF)Magnesium stearate NF 5.00 10.00Total (dry weight) 400.00 800.00______________________________________
Claims
- 1. A method for reducing abrasion of a tablet dosage form subject to abrasion during coating, comprising applying to an uncoated dosage form a subcoat consisting of an amount of a pharmaceutically acceptable polyalkylene glycol coating effective to reduce abrasion.
- 2. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the drug release characteristics of the coated tablet including the subcoat are the same as the tablet dosage form without the subcoat.
- 3. The method as recited in claim 1, whereto the polyalkylene glycol is polyethylene glycol.
- 4. The method as recited in claim 3, wherein the polyethylene glycol has a molecular weight of between about 6,000 to about 8,000.
- 5. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the polyalkylene glycol has a molecular weight of between about 4,000 to 10,000.
- 6. The method as recited in claim 5, wherein the molecular weight is between about 6,000 to about 8,000.
- 7. The method as recited in claim 1, wherein the polyalkylene glycol is applied as an aqueous solution.
- 8. The method as recited in claim 7, wherein the subcoat comprises about a 1 to 50% w/w aqueous solution of the polyalkylene glycol,
- 9. The method as recited in claim 8, wherein the subcoat comprises about a 5 to 20% w/w aqueous solution of the pglyalkylene glycol.
US Referenced Citations (20)
Foreign Referenced Citations (56)
Number |
Date |
Country |
4033064 |
Aug 1965 |
AUX |
8546934 |
Sep 1985 |
AUX |
8825946 |
Nov 1987 |
AUX |
609248 |
|
BEX |
717236 |
Dec 1968 |
BEX |
865633 |
Apr 1977 |
BEX |
896483 |
Apr 1983 |
BEX |
122463 |
Mar 1983 |
EPX |
0133827 |
Mar 1985 |
EPX |
238951 |
Mar 1986 |
EPX |
0409432 |
Jan 1991 |
EPX |
0572942 |
Dec 1993 |
EPX |
1483990 |
May 1966 |
FRX |
2293438 |
Dec 1974 |
FRX |
1617328 |
Jul 1966 |
DEX |
2058163 |
Dec 1969 |
DEX |
2522483 |
May 1975 |
DEX |
3636123 |
Oct 1986 |
DEX |
43165 |
May 1964 |
IEX |
815065 |
Dec 1962 |
JPX |
29369 |
Jan 1965 |
JPX |
7037796 |
Mar 1965 |
JPX |
2667769 |
Jul 1966 |
JPX |
2704069 |
Dec 1966 |
JPX |
7001076 |
Aug 1967 |
JPX |
179335 |
Sep 1975 |
JPX |
128512 |
Oct 1976 |
JPX |
095867 |
Aug 1977 |
JPX |
047058 |
Apr 1978 |
JPX |
134868 |
Oct 1978 |
JPX |
140349 |
Oct 1979 |
JPX |
124349 |
Sep 1980 |
JPX |
137936 |
Oct 1980 |
JPX |
149000 |
Sep 1981 |
JPX |
024534 |
Feb 1986 |
JPX |
051377 |
Mar 1986 |
JPX |
246391 |
Oct 1986 |
JPX |
161209 |
Jun 1987 |
JPX |
025341 |
Feb 1988 |
JPX |
6903248 |
Nov 1968 |
NGX |
624145 |
Oct 1961 |
ZAX |
650221 |
Jan 1964 |
ZAX |
655967 |
Dec 1964 |
ZAX |
8500209 |
Jul 1984 |
ZAX |
872146 |
Jan 1958 |
GBX |
887682 |
Oct 1958 |
GBX |
907309 |
Feb 1959 |
GBX |
907310 |
Feb 1959 |
GBX |
2025227 |
Jul 1978 |
GBX |
1544761 |
Apr 1979 |
GBX |
1598458 |
Sep 1981 |
GBX |
1091930 |
Nov 1981 |
SUX |
WO8400296 |
Jul 1982 |
WOX |
WO8501207 |
Sep 1983 |
WOX |
WO8604817 |
Feb 1985 |
WOX |
WO8707902 |
Jun 1986 |
WOX |