The section headings used herein are for organizational purposes only and should not be construed as limiting the subject matter described herein in any way.
1. Field
This application relates generally to over-current and/or over-voltage protection devices for use in electrical circuits and, in particular, to solid-state circuit breakers and circuits comprising the circuit breakers.
2. Background of the Technology
Industrial electrical applications, as well as many other areas, require the use of circuit breakers to meet certain safety measures. These circuit breakers are in place to provide disconnect points as well as fault protection for electrical systems. Short circuit, over current, and over voltage faults are three common faults detected and controlled by circuit breakers. The shortcomings of fuses and/or mechanical circuit breakers have been improved upon by electronic or solid state circuit breakers. For example, the nature of a fuse is such that during an over-current event the fuse “blows” meaning it becomes an indefinite open circuit. One risk of using fuses is that at start-up of a system a fuse may blow due to normal over currents present during start up only or may have already failed for an unknown reason and require replacement. Mechanical circuit breakers tend to be subject to vibration causing a false trip condition and for smaller, less capable units, may have to be physically reset when tripped. Those that can be reset remotely require expensive and heavy electromechanical actuators that are especially undesirable for mobile applications such as in aircraft or automobiles. Electromechanical relays are heavy, have slow response time, are prone to mechanical wear-out limiting the component reliability and lifetime, can create electrical discharge such as arcing that limits their insertion into dangerous or explosive environmental conditions, and are known to create spurious electrical noise.
Solid-state circuit breakers exist to overcome many of the disadvantages of mechanical circuit breakers.
There still exists a need, however, for solid-state circuit breakers having low insertion losses and sufficient bandwidth to detect and disconnect quickly when fault conditions occur.
A circuit breaker is provided which comprises:
a first saturable unipolar switch comprising a source a gate and a drain;
a first diode connected between the source and the drain of the first saturable unipolar switch, wherein the cathode of the first diode is connected to the drain of the first saturable unipolar switch; and
a controller adapted to detect current generated upon the onset of saturation in the first saturable unipolar switch, wherein the controller is adapted to supply a first voltage to the gate of the first saturable unipolar switch when saturation of the first saturable unipolar switch is not detected, wherein the controller is adapted to supply a second voltage to the gate of the first saturable unipolar switch when saturation of the first saturable unipolar switch is detected, and wherein the first saturable unipolar switch is in an on state when the first voltage is applied to the gate and in an off state when the second voltage is applied to the gate.
The circuit breaker can further comprise:
a second saturable unipolar switch comprising a source a gate and a drain, wherein the source of the second saturable unipolar switch is connected to the source of the first saturable unipolar switch; and
a second diode connected between the source and the drain of the second saturable unipolar switch, wherein the cathode of the second diode is connected to the drain of the second saturable unipolar switch; and
wherein the controller is adapted to detect current generated upon the onset of saturation in the second saturable unipolar switch, wherein the controller is adapted to supply the first voltage to the gate of the second saturable unipolar switch when saturation of the second saturable unipolar switch is not detected and wherein the controller is adapted to supply the second voltage to the gate of the second saturable unipolar switch when saturation of the second saturable unipolar switch is detected, and wherein the second saturable unipolar switch is in an on state when the first voltage is applied to the gate and in an off state when the second voltage is applied to the gate.
A circuit comprising a circuit breaker as set forth above is also provided.
An advantage of the invention is the simplicity of operation in detecting the over current condition and the certainty by which the fact of an over current condition is translated into an appropriate response. The use of saturable unipolar devices to both conduct normal current and to respond correctly to excessive current ensures error free detection of the over current condition at the same speed by which the over current condition can physically occur in the switch. Hence, unlike prior art, the method disclosed is not subject to the limitations of normal sensors of the over current condition. In addition, the method embodied in the controller circuit is inherently responsive to the fact that saturation of the unipolar device has occurred. By design, the response of the controller is directly caused by the effects of saturation of the unipolar switch in the path of the over current. Hence, unlike prior art, the method disclosed is not subject to the limitations of normal sensors of switch saturation. The combination of these two advantages is an innovation unknown in solid-state circuit breakers.
These and other features of the present teachings are set forth herein.
The skilled artisan will understand that the drawings, described below, are for illustration purposes only. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings in any way.
For the purposes of interpreting this specification, the use of “or” herein means “and/or” unless stated otherwise or where the use of “and/or” is clearly inappropriate. The use of “a” herein means “one or more” unless stated otherwise or where the use of “one or more” is clearly inappropriate. The use of “comprise,” “comprises,” “comprising,” “include,” “includes,” and “including” are interchangeable and not intended to be limiting. Furthermore, where the description of one or more embodiments uses the term “comprising,” those skilled in the art would understand that, in some specific instances, the embodiment or embodiments can be alternatively described using the language “consisting essentially of” and/or “consisting of.” It should also be understood that in some embodiments the order of steps or order for performing certain actions is immaterial so long as the present teachings remain operable. Moreover, in some embodiments two or more steps or actions can be conducted simultaneously.
An ideal solid-state circuit breaker should have zero insertion loss. In practice, solid-state circuit breakers should have the lowest practicable insertion loss. In addition, the control circuit should have sufficient bandwidth to detect and disconnect quickly when fault conditions occur. Other desirable features and characteristics of the present invention will become apparent from the subsequent detailed description of the invention and the claims, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and this background of the invention.
As used herein, a wide band gap semiconductor is a semiconductor with an energy band gap greater than 2 eV. Exemplary wide bandgap semiconductor materials include SiC and GaN.
As used herein, a saturable unipolar switching device is a unipolar switching device having a saturation current above which the current passing through the device will cause a voltage drop across the device that is much larger than it would otherwise be without saturation. Suitable saturable unipolar switching devices include JFETs and MOSFETs.
As used herein, a component of a circuit which is “connected to” another component or point in the circuit or “connected between” two components or points in a circuit can be either directly connected or indirectly connected to the other component(s) or point(s) in the circuit.
The design of a solid-state circuit breaker (SSCB) should account for the two types of faults expected: (1) hard shorts and (2) soft faults. Hard shorts, also known as instantaneous faults, can lead to very rapid increases in line current that must be detected and interrupted without delay. Because a source of power protected by a circuit breaker has low internal resistance to the flow of current to be efficient, they also allow large currents to flow during instantaneous faults. Such faults are thus easily distinguished from normal transients leading to a low false trip rate because of the large magnitude of current they create, but they are problematic due to the demand for high bandwidth detection and speedy current interruption. In fact, this problem is why a bipolar device is unsuitable for use in a solid-state circuit breaker. Soft faults, on the other hand, are similar to normal load transients, such as motor starting, but their detection is essential as they can be dangerous if left undetected due to the long period of thermal loading on the entire system, with fire a real threat to the component responsible for the soft fault.
There are various standards to make the soft fault detection decision. For example, the I2t (pronounced “I squared t”) standard allows the time before a positive fault response is initiated to increase as the difference between the magnitude of the current and a critical threshold value declines. The standard uses an approximately constant value for the integral of the square of the circuit breaker current i(t), known as the “action integral”
or less accurately as the “let through energy” [1], where t is the period of time before the action, or I2t, threshold is met, to quantitatively specify the decision threshold figure of merit. The maximum action on trip is an adjustable parameter for many programmable circuit breakers. Other figures of merit can also be used in more sophisticated programmable solid-state circuit breakers. The complexity of the decision making process is balanced by the relatively long periods of time allowed to make the decision, ranging from hundreds of milliseconds to hundreds of seconds in most applications. The Underwriter's Laboratory standard for the common molded mechanical circuit breaker is UL 489 [1]. UL 489 provides a standard mechanical circuit breaker time-current characteristic. The delay curves of the UL 489 standard are driven by application requirements for avoiding false trips due to normal load transients in excess of normal (“nominal”) rated current. The minimum time allowed for an “instantaneous” current trip is also defined by the needs of the application. For mechanical circuit breakers, “instantaneous” time-to-trip is specified in the UL 489 standard as less than 100 ms for currents ten times greater than nominal and are still greater than 1 ms for fault currents above 50 times nominal. These slow instantaneous trip times are adequate for protecting the current carrying wires, but they are too slow for more demanding protection requirements. Moreover, such long trip times are not suitable for protecting electronics-based power conversion components, like DC/DC converters, in which detection and trip should occur in less than 10 μs.
The controller for a solid-state circuit breaker can serve many purposes, ranging from protecting sensitive electronic equipment in a industrial plant to permitting remote reset and automated power management on a vehicle such as an aircraft, depending on the intended sophistication of the solid-state circuit breaker. To implement a standard circuit breaker function similar to the UL 489 standard for time-current characteristic, the controller should have an instantaneous trip capability and a delayed trip capability. In addition, a reset function for a tripped circuit breaker and the functionality to open the breaker on command should be supported. Current limiting during fault conditions is a desirable property of a circuit breaker that is rarely efficiently supported by mechanical circuit breakers. To incorporate this feature, some sort of current sensing element/circuit such as a current transformer or a current viewing resistor may be included to feedback information about the value of the current to the controller circuit for determination of fault or non-fault states. The method of current sensing utilized can: 1) add to insertion losses of the solid-state circuit breaker; 2) can be bandwidth limited; or 3) delay the time between when the current is sensed and the time in which the control circuit receives the feedback information.
In the solid-state circuit breaker disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,388,022, a resistive element is connected in series with the solid-state circuit breaker current path. A voltage is generated across the resistive element that is read, compared, amplified, and fed back to the solid-state circuit breaker control circuit. This method, however, adds additional insertion losses in series with the switch elements, as well as introduces bandwidth and delay times associated with the control circuit. Other methods may include replacing the resistive element with a type of magnetic current detector such as a hall-effect sensor or circuit sensing transistor. These methods, however, would also experience bandwidth limitations and insert some delay in the feedback of the detected signal.
This disclosure teaches a rapid response solid-state circuit breaker (SSCB) capable of instantaneous short circuit current interrupts far faster than that of circuit breakers in use today. The solid-state circuit breaker described herein utilizes the forward conduction characteristics of a saturable unipolar switch in order to develop a voltage sensing method that is proportional to the series current without injecting additional insertion losses or bandwidth limitations. The saturable unipolar switch can be either a junction field effect transistor (JFET) or metal-oxide-semiconductor field effect transistor (MOSFET). The invention can be configured to allow for either bi-directional operation as shown in
During conduction, current flows through the series switch or combination of one forward conducting channel and one reverse conducting channel. As shown in
As the drain current through the forward conducting switch increases to between 3 and 9 times above the specified nominal value (depending on junction temperature), the drain-source voltage increases according to the switching ID vs. VDS curve valid for the current junction temperature. The transition to saturation causes VDS to increase rapidly. The fault current is limited by saturation, but the power dissipation in the JFET increases rapidly, too. If the fault is relatively fast, then near adiabatic heating will occur and the JFET saturation current will decrease with the resulting increase in junction temperature. Thus, by using a SiC JFET as a saturable unipolar switch, the circuit breaker is inherently self limiting and can safely withstand short circuit conditions for periods of time orders of magnitude longer than a bipolar device like an IGBT. A SiC JFET is capable of tolerating large surge currents much longer than a comparable silicon device of both the unipolar type (e.g., a MOSFET or JFET) or especially a bipolar type (e.g., an IGBT) due to the high-temperature, thermally rugged features inherent to silicon carbide as a semiconductor material.
The delayed trip can be initiated by a microcontroller according to a pre-programmed function responding to data from a relatively low bandwidth current sensor. One such function among many possible functions is illustrated by the “I2t” curve denoted “programmed trip delay” in
For the case of a uni-directional solid-state circuit breaker, the connection to the output bus, including the second diode D2 connected between the drain of the normally-on JFET and the output bus, would not be included in the control circuit depicted in
The overall speed of action of the control circuit depicted in
Breaking the conducting path between the source bus and the load causes the drain-source voltage of the forward blocking solid-state circuit breaker switch to rise to the open-circuit bus voltage which maintains the charge in the capacitor C1 with current “leaking” through the normally-on JFET J1 that is in turn self biased into pinch-off by the resistor-capacitor voltage drop. The capacitor voltage is limited by the Zener diode Z1 shown in
The high-voltage biasing diode D2 connected to the drain of the non-blocking solid-state circuit breaker switch (i.e., the “Output Bus” terminal in
Indefinite lockout on trip can be accomplished with one additional logic element if desired. One of the optocouplers shown in
The control circuit can also be set up to accommodate the use of normally-on devices as saturable unipolar switches.
For devices that require no positive bias, such as some SiC JFETs, the isolated +V node of the controller embodiment depicted in
A controller for normally-on device(s) that do not require a positive bias at turn on is provided. A controller of this type is depicted in
A controller for normally-on or normally-off device(s) that require a positive bias at turn on and a negative bias at turn off is also provided. A controller of this type is depicted in
The control circuits shown in
Well known snubber circuits can be included to automatically handle any reaction from parasitic inductance. An exemplary snubber circuit is disclosed in Urciuoli, Army Research Lab, Report No. ARL-MR-0693, May 2008 [1]. This circuit is merely exemplary, however, and other known snubbing techniques and circuits can also be used. A bidirectional circuit breaker comprising a bidirectional snubber circuit 10 according to a first embodiment is shown in
A rapid response solid state circuit breaker is described. The circuit breaker includes at least one saturable unipolar switching device such as a power JFET or MOSFET. The JFET can be made of a wide bandgap material The MOSFET can be made of silicon or a wide bandgap material. The circuit breaker can have one voltage bus input and one voltage bus output.
The circuit breaker can be a bidirectional circuit breaker comprising two saturable unipolar switching devices. The drain terminal of the first switching device is connected to the input bus. The drain terminal can also be connected to the anode terminal of diode D1 of the control circuit as shown in
The gate of the first unipolar switching device can be driven by the fault detection control circuit. If a second unipolar switching device is present, both gates are connected together and both gates can be controlled by the same output of the fault detection control circuit. A circuit common is present and is connected to the negative terminal of the input bus and the negative terminal of the output bus.
A voltage sensing control circuit is also provided. The voltage sensing control circuit can comprise:
The controller may also include manual trip and reset points. The manual trip and reset points can comprise optocoupler devices. For example, the controller may include first and second optocoupler devices (U1 and U2), one of which (U1) is used as an electronic manual trip point and the other of which (U2) serves as an electronic manual reset point. The activated optocoupler will hold the gates of the CMOS totem pole either high or low depending on the user selected state.
Programmable I2t functionality can be provided internally by a control signal connection to the gates of the CMOS totem pole driver or externally by control signal connection to the trip and reset inputs.
The practice of this invention can be further understood by reference to the following examples, which are provided by way of illustration only are not intended to be limiting.
Instantaneous Trip Testing (i.e. Short Circuit, Hard Fault Condition)
Circuit validation was performed using a bi-directional solid-state circuit breaker comprising two 1200 V, 7 A, normally-off JFETs. Hard fault testing was accomplished using an input bus voltage of 600 V (giving each switch a 2× voltage safety rating). A short circuit event was created at the solid-state circuit breaker output connection to test the control circuit response time.
Soft Fault Trip Testing (i.e. Over Current)
For this test, the performance of the control circuit response to a soft fault (or over current) condition was analyzed. During this test a preprogrammed I2t control circuit was not employed so that the characteristics of the invented control circuit could be observed. In this test, the normally-off JFETs of the solid-state circuit breaker were allowed to self limit the series current. This self-limiting process causes the drain voltage of the switch to rise to the preselected trip point of the control circuit and command a need for a trip condition. This behavior is identical to the hard fault case. However, the trip duration is extended because the current does not instantly rise to a dangerous value. Instead, during a soft fault the series current is above the nominal circuit breaker rated current but not yet at a dangerous level for the switch elements. As the current continues to flow, the device will begin to heat causing an increase in drain voltage until the designated trip point is reached.
While the foregoing specification teaches the principles of the present invention, with examples provided for the purpose of illustration, it will be appreciated by one skilled in the art from reading this disclosure that various changes in form and detail can be made without departing from the true scope of the invention.
This invention was made with government support under Contract No. W56 HZV-09-C-0159 awarded by the United States Army, Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD). The government has certain rights in the invention.