This disclosure relates generally to power control systems and devices and, in particular, solid-state power interrupter devices and for disrupting power to loads.
Electrical power interrupters are an essential component in electrical distribution systems and are often positioned between an incoming high-current utility supply circuit and lower current branch circuits within a given building or home structure to protect branch circuit conductors and electrical loads from being exposed to over-current conditions. There are several types of over current conditions including overload conditions and fault conditions. An overload condition is defined as operation of equipment in excess of its normal, full-load rating, or a branch circuit in excess of its ampacity which, when the overload persists for a sufficient period of time, would cause damage or dangerous overheating. Fault conditions comprise unintended or accidental load conditions that typically produce much higher over-current conditions than do overloads, depending on the impedance of the fault. A fault producing the maximum over-current condition is referred to as a short-circuit or a “bolted fault.”
Conventional power interrupters are electromechanical in nature and have electrical contacts that are physically separated by either manual intervention of an operator lever or automatically upon the occurrence of a fault condition or prolonged over current condition, in which cases the circuit interrupter is deemed to be “tripped.” The separation of the electrical contacts of a circuit breaker can be performed electromagnetically or mechanically, or a combination of both. A significant problem with conventional circuit interrupters is that they are slow to react to fault conditions due to their electromechanical construction, and exhibit large variations in both the time to trip and the current trip limit in response to a fault or prolonged over-current conditions. Conventional power interrupters typically require at least several milliseconds to isolate a fault condition. The slow reaction time is undesirable since it raises the risk of hazardous fire, damage to electrical equipment, and arc-flashes, which can occur at the short-circuit location when a bolted fault is not isolated quickly enough.
Embodiments of the disclosure include solid-state power interrupter devices and methods for interrupting power from a source to a load. For example, an exemplary embodiment includes a power interrupter device which comprises a solid-state bidirectional switch and control circuitry. The solid-state bidirectional switch is connected between an input terminal and an output terminal of the power interrupter device. The control circuitry configured to control the solid-state bidirectional switch. The control circuitry comprises driver circuitry and fault detection circuitry. The driver circuitry is configured to generate a regulated direct current (DC) voltage using current drawn from an input power source applied to the input terminal of the power interrupter device, and apply the regulated DC voltage to a control input of the solid-state bidirectional switch. The fault detection circuitry is configured to (i) sense a level of load current flowing in an electrical path between the input terminal and the output terminal of the power interrupter device, (ii) detect an occurrence of a fault condition based on the sensed load current level, and (iii) short the control input of the solid-state bidirectional switch to place the solid-state bidirectional switch in a switched-off state, in response to detecting the occurrence of a fault condition.
Other embodiments will be described in the following detailed description of embodiments, which is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying figures.
Embodiments of the disclosure will now be described in further detail with regard to solid-state power interrupter devices and techniques for interrupting power from a source to a load based on, e.g., a detection of a fault condition (e.g., a short-circuit fault, an over-current fault, etc.) or in response to external control signals. It is to be understood that same or similar reference numbers are used throughout the drawings to denote the same or similar features, elements, or structures, and thus, a detailed explanation of the same or similar features, elements, or structures will not be repeated for each of the drawings. The term “exemplary” as used herein means “serving as an example, instance, or illustration”. Any embodiment or design described herein as “exemplary” is not to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs.
The solid-state power interrupter 100 comprises a double pole single throw (DPST) switch circuit which comprises a first solid-state switch 102, a second solid-state switch 104, and control circuitry 110 which comprises a first control circuit block 112, and a second control circuit block 114. In some embodiments, the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 comprise power MOSFET (metal-oxide semiconductor field-effect transistor) devices and, in particular, N-type enhancement MOSFET devices having gate terminals (G), drain terminals (D), and source terminals (S) as shown. The first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 (alternatively MOSFET switches 102 and 104) comprise respective intrinsic body diodes 102-1 and 104-1, which represent P-N junctions between a P-type substrate body and N-doped drain regions of the MOSFET devices. In this regard, the body diodes 102-1 and 104-1 are intrinsic elements of the MOSFET switches 102 and 104 (i.e., not discrete elements). It is to be noted that the intrinsic body-to-source diodes of the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 are not shown as it is assumed that they are shorted out by connections between the source regions and the substrate bodies (e.g., N+ source and P body junction are shorted through source metallization).
The first solid-state switch 102 is serially connected in an electrical path (referred to as “hot line path”) between the line hot terminal 100A and the load hot terminal 100C of the solid-state interrupter 100. The second solid-state switch 104 is serially connected in an electrical path (referred to as “neutral line path”) between the line neutral terminal 100B and the load neutral terminal 100D of the solid-state interrupter 100. The first control circuit block 112 controls a gate-to-source voltage (VGS) that is applied to the first solid-state switch 102 to control the activation and deactivation of the first solid-state switch 102. The second control circuit block 114 controls a gate-to-source voltage that is applied to the second solid-state switch 104 to control the activation and deactivation of the second solid-state switch 104. The first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 collectively comprise a solid-state bidirectional switch that is configured to enable bidirectional current flow between the AC mains 10 and the load 20 (i.e., conduct positive current or negative current) when the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 are in a switched-on state, and block current flow between the AC mains 10 and the load 20 when the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 are in a switched-off state.
More specifically, in normal operation of the solid-state power interrupter 100, during a positive half cycle of an AC supply voltage waveform of the AC mains 10, a positive current flows in the hot line path through the first solid-state switch 102, through the load 20, and then in the neutral line path through the forward biased body diode 104-1, and back to the AC mains 10. On the other hand, during a negative half cycle of the AC supply voltage waveform of the AC mains 10, a negative current flows in the neutral line path through the second solid-state switch 104, through the load 20, and then in the hot line path through the forward biased body diode 102-1, and back to the AC mains 10. The exemplary configuration of simultaneously controlling AC switches on both the line and the neutral is referred to as double-pole switching and is applied to the two lines (hot and neural lines) of opposite phase from the single AC energy source.
The control circuitry 110 implements various functions for controlling the activation and deactivation of the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104. For example, in some embodiments, the control circuitry 110 comprises self-biasing driver circuitry which is configured to utilize AC power from the AC mains 10 to generate regulated DC voltages to drive the gate terminals of the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104. Further, in some embodiments, the control circuitry 110 comprises fault detection circuitry which is configured to sense an amount of load current flowing in the hot line path and/or the neutral line path through the solid-state interrupter 100, and detect an occurrence of a fault condition, such as short-circuit fault, an over-current fault, etc., based on the sensed current level. In response to detecting a fault condition, the fault detection circuitry is configured to short the control input (e.g., gate terminal) of at least one of the solid-state switches 102 and 104 to interrupt power to the load 20.
Furthermore, in some embodiments, the control circuitry 110 comprises a control switch to implement a forced turn-off control mode in which the solid-state power interrupter 100 is controlled by external control signals. For example, in some embodiments, the control circuitry 110 implements an optical switch which is configured to short the control inputs of the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 to place the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 in a switched-off state, in response to an optical control signal applied to the optical switch. In some embodiments, the control circuitry 110 implements a forced turn-off control mode in which the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 are turned-off in response to the detection of certain events including, but not limited to, detection of fault events, detection of hazardous environmental conditions, remote commands for circuit interruption, etc. As explained in further detail below, the forced turn-off control mode can be initiated on command by, e.g., direct hardware fault sensing and control, and/or through a galvanically isolated control input based on, but not limited to, optical, magnetic, capacitive, and RF isolation technologies.
In some embodiments, the isolation circuitry 210 comprises a control circuit 220, a solid-state bidirectional switch comprising MOSFET switches 222 and 224 and associated body diodes 222-1 and 224-1. When the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 are turned off, the control circuit 220 generates gate control voltages to activate the MOSFET switches 222 and 224, and thereby create a short circuit path between the load hot terminal 100C and the load neutral terminal 100D, which allows any leakage current from the deactivated first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 to flow through the isolation circuitry 210, and thereby shunt the unwanted leakage to prevent such leakage current from flowing into the load 20. The effect of bypassing or shunting leakage current away from the load 20 serves to isolate (e.g., galvanically isolate) the load 120 from the solid-state power interrupter 200 when the first and second switches 102 and 104 are in a switched-off state in a way that is equivalent to a galvanic isolation technique which implements an air-gap between the AC mains 10 and the load 20. In this configuration, the isolation circuitry 210 serves as a pseudo air-gap.
For example, as schematically illustrated in
As schematically illustrated in
In this exemplary embodiment, the voltage level on the internal node N1 is limited by the Zener voltage (i.e., reverse breakdown voltage) of the Zener diode 330 such that the Zener diode 330 serves as a solid-state clamp to limit the driving voltage on the internal node N1 to drive the control inputs (e.g., gate terminals) of the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104. In this regard, the self-bias driving voltage is input-line voltage independent, as the level of the self-bias driving voltage is limited by the solid-state clamp. During a positive half cycle of AC supply voltage waveform of the AC mains 10, the first diode 320 is activated, and current flows from the line hot 11 to the line neutral 12 through the first diode 320, the first resistor 324, the capacitor 332, and the body diode 104-1 of the second solid-state switch 104. This current flow causes charge to trickle across the Zener diode 330 to maintain the regulated DC voltage (i.e., the Zener voltage) on the internal node N1 for driving the control terminal of the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104.
Further, in some embodiments, the current sense resistor 312, the operational amplifier 314, and the first control switch 316 collectively comprise a fault detection circuit of the control circuitry 310. The fault detection circuit is configured to (i) sense an amount of load current flowing in the hot line path through the solid-state interrupter 300, (ii) detect an occurrence of a fault condition, such as short-circuit fault, an over-current fault, etc., based on the sensed current level, and (iii) in response to detecting the fault condition, shunt the control inputs (e.g., gate terminals) of the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 to thereby deactivate the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 and interrupt power to the load 20.
As schematically illustrated in
During operation, the sense resistor 312 generates a burden voltage or sense voltage as a result of load current flowing in the hot line path through the sense resistor 312. The sense voltage is applied to the differential inputs of the operational amplifier 314, and the operational amplifier 314 amplifies the sense voltage to generate an output voltage that is applied to the base terminal of the first control switch 316. When the output voltage of operational amplifier 314 is high enough (e.g., base-emitter voltage VBE is about 0.7 V), the first control switch 316 will turn on, which shunts the gate and source terminals of the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104, and thereby causes the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 to turn off and interrupt power to the load 20.
In some embodiments, the sense resistor 312 has a very small resistance value such as on the order of 1 milliohm or less (e.g., 10× less than 1 milliohm). In this regard, the sense voltage across the sense resistors 312 is negligible in terms of causing minimal power dissipation, but yet sufficient for current sensing. The operational amplifier 314 is configured to have sufficient gain to be able to drive the first control switch 316, even with a relatively small voltage input corresponding to the voltage drop across the sense resistor 312. In this regard, the resistance value of the sense resistor 312 and the gain of the operational amplifier 314 are selected for a target load current limit (e.g., 100 amperes) to ensure that the output of the operational amplifier 314 generates a sufficient voltage to turn on the first control switch 316 when the magnitude of load current that flows through the sense resistor 312 reaches or exceeds the target current limit. In other words, the sense resistor 312 can have a relatively small resistance value (e.g., 1 milliohm) which generates a relatively small sense voltage and minimizes power dissipation for normal circuit operation, but which is amplified by the operational amplifier 314 to enable over-current detection using the small sense voltage. Moreover, the resistance value of the sense resistor 312 can remain fixed (e.g., 1 milliohm) while the gain of the operational amplifier 314 is adjusted as desired to adjust the target load current level for over-current and short circuit detection.
Furthermore, in some embodiments, the control circuitry 310 includes the second control switch 318 to implement a forced turn-off control circuit in which the solid-state power interrupter 300 is controlled by a control signal 318-s (e.g., optical signal) which is generated by, e.g., an external control system or device. In particular, the second control switch 318 is activated in response to the control signal 318-s, wherein activation of the second control switch 318 serves to shunt the gate and source terminals of the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104, which thereby causes the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 to turn off and interrupt power to the load 20.
In some embodiments, the second control switch 318 comprises a phototransistor (e.g., an optical BJT device which includes a photodiode junction) or other types of optically controlled switches which receive optical signals from complementary light emitting diodes (LED) that are controlled by, e.g., a sensor device or a microcontroller. The control signal 318-s can be generated in response to remote commands (e.g., alarm signals) received from a local or a remote controller that is configured to detect fault conditions, or in response to remote commands received from an individual who can control operation of the solid-state power interrupter 300 through smart technologies implemented using, for example, an Internet-of-Things (IoT) wireless computing network, wherein the solid-state power interrupter 300 comprises a smart wireless IoT device.
In some embodiments, the control signal 318-s is generated in response to the detection of hazardous environmental conditions by one or more sensors that are configured to sense environmental conditions. For example, such sensors can include one or more of (i) a chemical sensitive detector that is configured to detect the presence of hazardous chemicals, (ii) a gas sensitive detector that is configured to detect the presence of hazardous gases, (iii) a temperature sensor that is configured to detect high temperatures indicative of, e.g., a fire, (iv) a piezoelectric detector that is configured to detect large vibrations associated with, e.g., explosions, earthquakes, etc., (v) a humidity sensor or water sensor that is configured to detect floods or damp conditions, and other types of sensors that are configured to detect for the presence or occurrence of hazardous environmental conditions that would warrant power interruption to the load 20.
In some embodiments, the control signal 318-s comprises ambient light that is sensed by the second control switch 318 which operates as a light sensor when implemented as a phototransistor. In this instance, the solid-state power interrupter 300 can be a component of an electrical light switch device such that when the intensity of the ambient light (e.g., intensity of the optical signal 318-3) reaches a certain level, the second control switch 318 is activated to turn off the first and second solid-state switches 102 and 104 an interrupt power that is delivered to a lighting element.
The optical coupling between second control switch 318 and the external control system which control the generation of the control signal 318-s essentially provides galvanic isolation between the solid-state power interrupter 300 and the external control system. In other embodiments, galvanic isolation can be implemented using magnetic, capacitive, or radio frequency (RF) isolation technologies.
Similar to the operation of the control circuitry 310 of
On the other hand, during a positive half cycle of AC supply voltage waveform of the AC mains 10, the first diode 320 is activated, and current flows from the line hot 11 to the line neutral 12 through the first diode 320, the first resistor 324, the capacitor 432, and the body diode 104-1 of the second solid-state switch 104. This current flow causes a voltage across the capacitor 432 to increase until the capacitor voltage reaches the Zener voltage of the Zener diode 430, whereby the Zener diode 430 serves as a solid-state clamp to limit the level of the regulated DC voltage that is maintained on the internal node N4 to drive the second solid-state switch 104.
Furthermore, while not specifically shown in
As schematically illustrated in
In some embodiments, the sense resistor 512 has a resistance value that is selected for a target load current limit (e.g., 100 amperes) to ensure that the first control switch 316 is activated when the magnitude of the load current that flows through the sense resistor 512 reaches or exceeds the target load current limit. For example, assuming that the first control switch 316 is activated when the base-emitter voltage VBE reaches 0.7 V, and assuming that the load current limit is selected to be 100 amperes, the sense resistor would have a resistance of 0.007 ohms (i.e., V=IR, where 0.7 V=100 A×0.007 ohms).
Furthermore, while not specifically shown in
As further shown in
As shown in
During a negative half cycle of an AC supply voltage waveform of the AC mains 10, the diodes 624 and 602 are activated, and current flows from the line neutral 12 to the line hot 11 through the diode 624, the resistor 626, the first capacitor 612, and the diode 602. This current flow causes a voltage across the first capacitor 612 to increase until the capacitor voltage reaches a Zener voltage of the first Zener diode 610. In this regard, the first Zener diode 610 serves as a solid-state clamp to limit the level of the regulated DC voltage VDC1 that is maintained on the first node N1. On the other hand, during a positive half cycle of AC supply voltage waveform of the AC mains 10, the diodes 620 and 604 are activated, and current flows from the line hot 11 to the line neutral 12 through the diode 620, the resistor 622, the second capacitor 616, and the diode 604. This current flow causes a voltage across the second capacitor 616 to increase until the capacitor voltage reaches the Zener voltage of the second Zener diode 614. In this regard, the second Zener diode 614 serves as a solid-state clamp to limit the level of the regulated DC voltage VDC2 that is maintained on the second node N2.
Exemplary embodiments of the disclosure as shown in
Although exemplary embodiments have been described herein with reference to the accompanying figures, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to those precise embodiments, and that various other changes and modifications may be made therein by one skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/029,549, filed on Jul. 7, 2018, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3638102 | Pelka | Jan 1972 | A |
3777253 | Callan | Dec 1973 | A |
4074345 | Ackermann | Feb 1978 | A |
4127895 | Krueger | Nov 1978 | A |
4245148 | Gisske et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4245184 | Billings et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4245185 | Mitchell et al. | Jan 1981 | A |
4257081 | Sauer et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4466071 | Russell, Jr. | Aug 1984 | A |
4487458 | Janutka | Dec 1984 | A |
4581540 | Guajardo | Apr 1986 | A |
4631625 | Alexander et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4636907 | Howell | Jan 1987 | A |
4649302 | Damiano et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4653084 | Ahuja | Mar 1987 | A |
4682061 | Donovan | Jul 1987 | A |
4685046 | Sanders | Aug 1987 | A |
4709296 | Hung et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
4760293 | Hebenstreit | Jul 1988 | A |
4766281 | Buhler | Aug 1988 | A |
4812995 | Girgis et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4888504 | Kinzer | Dec 1989 | A |
5121282 | White | Jun 1992 | A |
5276737 | Micali | Jan 1994 | A |
5307257 | Fukushima | Apr 1994 | A |
5371646 | Biegelmeier | Dec 1994 | A |
5410745 | Friesen et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5559656 | Chokhawala | Sep 1996 | A |
5646514 | Tsunetsugu | Jul 1997 | A |
5654880 | Brkovic et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5731732 | Williams | Mar 1998 | A |
5793596 | Jordan et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5796274 | Willis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5859756 | Pressman | Jan 1999 | A |
5870009 | Serpinet et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5933305 | Schmalz et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6081123 | Kasbarian et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6111494 | Fischer et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6115267 | Herbert | Sep 2000 | A |
6141197 | Kim et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6160689 | Stolzenberg | Dec 2000 | A |
6167329 | Engel et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169391 | Lei | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188203 | Rice et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6300748 | Miller | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6369554 | Aram | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6483290 | Hemminger et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6515434 | Biebl | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6538906 | Ke et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6756998 | Bilger | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6788512 | Vicente et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6813720 | Leblanc | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839208 | Macbeth et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6843680 | Gorman | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6906476 | Beatenbough et al. | Jun 2005 | B1 |
6984988 | Yamamoto | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7045723 | Projkovski | May 2006 | B1 |
7053626 | Monter et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7110225 | Hick | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7164238 | Kazanov et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7292419 | Nemir | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7297603 | Robb et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7304828 | Shvartsman | Dec 2007 | B1 |
D558683 | Pape et al. | Jan 2008 | S |
7319574 | Engel | Jan 2008 | B2 |
D568253 | Gorman | May 2008 | S |
7367121 | Gorman | May 2008 | B1 |
7586285 | Gunji | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7595680 | Morita et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7610616 | Masuouka et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7633727 | Zhou et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7643256 | Wright et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7693670 | Durling et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7715216 | Liu et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7729147 | Wong et al. | Jun 2010 | B1 |
7731403 | Lynam et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7746677 | Unkrich | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7821023 | Yuan et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
D638355 | Chen | May 2011 | S |
7936279 | Tang et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7948719 | Xu | May 2011 | B2 |
8124888 | Etemad-Moghadam et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8256675 | Baglin et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8374729 | Chapel et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8463453 | Parsons, Jr. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8482885 | Billingsley et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8560134 | Lee | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8649883 | Lu et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8664886 | Ostrovsky | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8717720 | DeBoer | May 2014 | B2 |
8718830 | Smith | May 2014 | B2 |
8781637 | Eaves | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8817441 | Callanan | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8890371 | Gotou | Nov 2014 | B2 |
D720295 | Dodal et al. | Dec 2014 | S |
8947838 | Yamai et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9054587 | Neyman | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9055641 | Shteynberg et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9287792 | Telefus et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9325516 | Pera et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9366702 | Steele et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9439318 | Chen | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9443845 | Stafanov et al. | Sep 2016 | B1 |
9502832 | Ullahkhan et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9509083 | Yang | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9515560 | Telefus et al. | Dec 2016 | B1 |
9577420 | Ostrovsky et al. | Feb 2017 | B2 |
9621053 | Telefus | Apr 2017 | B1 |
9755630 | Urciuoli | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9774182 | Phillips | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9836243 | Chanler et al. | Dec 2017 | B1 |
D814424 | DeCosta | Apr 2018 | S |
9965007 | Amelio et al. | May 2018 | B2 |
9990786 | Ziraknejad | Jun 2018 | B1 |
9991633 | Robinet | Jun 2018 | B2 |
10072942 | Wootton et al. | Sep 2018 | B2 |
10101716 | Kim | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10187944 | MacAdam et al. | Jan 2019 | B2 |
10469077 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
D879056 | Telefus | Mar 2020 | S |
D881144 | Telefus | Apr 2020 | S |
10615713 | Telefus et al. | Apr 2020 | B2 |
10645536 | Barnes et al. | May 2020 | B1 |
10756662 | Steiner et al. | Aug 2020 | B2 |
10812072 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10812282 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10819336 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2020 | B2 |
10834792 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | B2 |
10887447 | Jakobsson et al. | Jan 2021 | B2 |
10936749 | Jakobsson | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10951435 | Jakobsson | Mar 2021 | B2 |
10985548 | Telefus | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10992236 | Telefus et al. | Apr 2021 | B2 |
10993082 | Jakobsson | Apr 2021 | B2 |
20020109487 | Telefus et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030052544 | Yamamoto et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030063420 | Pahl et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030151865 | Maio | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20040032756 | Van Den Bossche | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040251884 | Steffie et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050128657 | Covault | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050162139 | Hirst | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050185353 | Rasmussen et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050286184 | Campolo | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060285366 | Radecker et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070008747 | Soldano et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070143826 | Sastry et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070159745 | Berberich et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070188025 | Keagy et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070236152 | Davis et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080006607 | Boeder et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080136581 | Heilman et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080151444 | Upton | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080174922 | Kimbrough | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080180866 | Wong | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080197699 | Yu | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080204950 | Zhou et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080253153 | Wu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281472 | Podgorny et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090034139 | Martin | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090067201 | Cai | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090168273 | Yu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090195349 | Frader-Thompson et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090203355 | Clark | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090213629 | Liu et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090284385 | Tang et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100091418 | Xu | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100145479 | Griffiths | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145542 | Chapel et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100156369 | Kularatna et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100188054 | Asakura et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100231135 | Hum et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100231373 | Romp | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100244730 | Nerone | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100261373 | Roneker | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100284207 | Watanabe et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100296207 | Schumacher et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100320840 | Fridberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110062936 | Bartelous | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110121752 | Newman, Jr. et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110127922 | Sauerlaender | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110156610 | Ostrovsky et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110273103 | Hong | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110292703 | Cuk | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299547 | Diab et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301894 | Sanderford, Jr. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305054 | Yamagiwa et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110307447 | Sabaa et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120026632 | Acharya et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120075897 | Fujita | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120089266 | Tomimbang et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120095605 | Tran | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133289 | Hum et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120275076 | Shono | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120311035 | Guha et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130051102 | Huang et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130057247 | Russell et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130063851 | Stevens et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130066478 | Smith | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130088160 | Chai et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130119958 | Gasperi | May 2013 | A1 |
20130128396 | Danesh et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130170261 | Lee et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130174211 | Aad et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130245841 | Ahn et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130253898 | Meagher et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20130261821 | Lu et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130300534 | Myllymaki | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130329331 | Erger et al. | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140043732 | McKay et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140067137 | Amelio et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140074730 | Arensmeier et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140085940 | Lee et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140096272 | Makofsky et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140097809 | Follic et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140159593 | Chu et al. | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20140203718 | Yoon et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140246926 | Cruz et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140266698 | Hall et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140268935 | Chiang | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140276753 | Wham et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20150042274 | Kim et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150055261 | Lubick et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150097430 | Scruggs | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150116886 | Zehnder et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150154404 | Patel et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150155789 | Freeman et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150180469 | Kim | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150185261 | Frader-Thompson et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150216006 | Lee et al. | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150236587 | Kim et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150253364 | Hieda et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256355 | Pera et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150256665 | Pera et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150282223 | Wang et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150309521 | Pan | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150317326 | Bandarupalli et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20150355649 | Ovadia | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20150362927 | Giorgi | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160012699 | Lundy | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160018800 | Gettings et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160035159 | Ganapathy Achari et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160057841 | Lenig | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160069933 | Cook et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160077746 | Muth et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160081143 | Wang | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160110154 | Qureshi et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160117917 | Prakash et al. | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160126031 | Wootton et al. | May 2016 | A1 |
20160178691 | Simonin | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160181941 | Gratton et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160195864 | Kim | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160247799 | Stafanov et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160259308 | Fadell et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160260135 | Zomet et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160277528 | Guilaume et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20160294179 | Kennedy et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160343083 | Hering et al. | Nov 2016 | A1 |
20160360586 | Yang et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20160374134 | Kweon et al. | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170004948 | Leyh | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170019969 | O'Neil et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170026194 | Vijayrao et al. | Jan 2017 | A1 |
20170033942 | Koeninger | Feb 2017 | A1 |
20170063225 | Guo et al. | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170086281 | Avrahamy | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170099647 | Shah et al. | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20170170730 | Sugiura | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170171802 | Hou et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170179946 | Turvey | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170195130 | Landow et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170212653 | Kanojia et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
20170230193 | Apte et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170244241 | Wilson et al. | Aug 2017 | A1 |
20170256934 | Kennedy et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170256941 | Bowers et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170256956 | Irish et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170277709 | Strauss et al. | Sep 2017 | A1 |
20170314743 | Del Castillo et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322049 | Wootton et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170322258 | Miller et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170338809 | Stefanov et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170347415 | Cho et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20170366950 | Arbon | Dec 2017 | A1 |
20180026534 | Turcan | Jan 2018 | A1 |
20180054862 | Takagimoto et al. | Feb 2018 | A1 |
20180061158 | Greene | Mar 2018 | A1 |
20180146369 | Kennedy, Jr. | May 2018 | A1 |
20180174076 | Fukami | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20180196094 | Fishburn et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180201302 | Sonoda et al. | Jul 2018 | A1 |
20180254959 | Mantyjarvi et al. | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20180285198 | Dantkale et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180287802 | Brickell | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180301006 | Flint et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180307609 | Qiang et al. | Oct 2018 | A1 |
20180342329 | Rufo et al. | Nov 2018 | A1 |
20180359039 | Daoura et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20180359223 | Maier et al. | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190003855 | Wootton et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190020477 | Antonatos et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190028869 | Kaliner | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190036928 | Meriac et al. | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190050903 | DeWitt et al. | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190052174 | Gong | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190068716 | Lauer | Feb 2019 | A1 |
20190086979 | Kao et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190087835 | Schwed et al. | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190104138 | Storms et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190122834 | Wootton et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190140640 | Telefus et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190165691 | Telefus et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190207375 | Telefus et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20190238060 | Telefus et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190245457 | Telefus et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190253243 | Zimmerman et al. | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190268176 | Pognant | Aug 2019 | A1 |
20190280887 | Telefus et al. | Sep 2019 | A1 |
20190306953 | Joyce et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190334999 | Ryhorchuk et al. | Oct 2019 | A1 |
20190355014 | Gerber | Nov 2019 | A1 |
20190372331 | Liu et al. | Dec 2019 | A1 |
20200007126 | Telefus et al. | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200014301 | Telefus | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200014379 | Telefus | Jan 2020 | A1 |
20200044883 | Telefus et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200052607 | Telefus et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200053100 | Jakobsson | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200106259 | Telefus | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200106260 | Telefus | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200106637 | Jakobsson | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200120202 | Jakobsson et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200145247 | Jakobsson | May 2020 | A1 |
20200153245 | Jakobsson et al. | May 2020 | A1 |
20200159960 | Jakobsson | May 2020 | A1 |
20200193785 | Berglund et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200196110 | Jakobsson | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200196412 | Telefus et al. | Jun 2020 | A1 |
20200260287 | Hendel | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200275266 | Jakobsson | Aug 2020 | A1 |
20200287537 | Telefus et al. | Sep 2020 | A1 |
20200314233 | Mohalik et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200328694 | Telefus et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200344596 | Dong et al. | Oct 2020 | A1 |
20200365345 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200365346 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200365356 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200366078 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200366079 | Telefus et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200394332 | Jakobsson et al. | Dec 2020 | A1 |
20210014947 | Telefus et al. | Jan 2021 | A1 |
20210119528 | Telefus | Apr 2021 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
109075551 | Jan 2021 | CN |
19712261 | Oct 1998 | DE |
0016646 | Oct 1980 | EP |
0398026 | Nov 1990 | EP |
2560063 | Feb 2013 | EP |
1302357 | Jan 1973 | GB |
2458699 | Sep 2009 | GB |
06-053779 | Feb 1994 | JP |
2012244716 | Dec 2012 | JP |
2013230034 | Nov 2013 | JP |
2014030355 | Feb 2014 | JP |
2010110951 | Sep 2010 | WO |
2016010529 | Jan 2016 | WO |
2016105505 | Jun 2016 | WO |
2016110833 | Jul 2016 | WO |
2017196571 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017196572 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2017196649 | Nov 2017 | WO |
2018075726 | Apr 2018 | WO |
2018080604 | May 2018 | WO |
2018080614 | May 2018 | WO |
2018081619 | May 2018 | WO |
2018081619 | May 2018 | WO |
2019133110 | Jul 2019 | WO |
2020014158 | Jan 2020 | WO |
2020014161 | Jan 2020 | WO |
PCTUS1954102 | Feb 2020 | WO |
2020072516 | Apr 2020 | WO |
PCTUS1967004 | Apr 2020 | WO |
2020131977 | Jun 2020 | WO |
PCTUS2033421 | Sep 2020 | WO |
2020236726 | Nov 2020 | WO |
PCTUS2114320 | Apr 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
L. Shengyuan et al., “Instantaneous Value Sampling AC-DC Converter and its Application in Power Quantity Detection,” 2011 Third International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation, Jan. 6-7, 2011, 4 pages. |
H.-H. Chang et al., “Load Recognition for Different Loads with the Same Real Power and Reactive Power in a Non-intrusive Load-monitoring System,” 2008 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, Apr. 16-18, 2008, 6 pages. |
F. Stajano et al., “The Resurrecting Duckling: Security Issues for Ad-hoc Wireless Networks,” International Workshop on Security Protocols, 1999, 11 pages. |
L. Sweeney, “Simple Demographics Often Identify People Uniquely,” Carnegie Mellon University, Data Privacy Working Paper 3, 2000, 34 pages. |
A. Narayanan et al., “Robust De-anonymization of Large Sparse Datasets,” IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, May 2008, 15 pages. |
M. Alahmad et al., “Non-lntrusive Electrical Load Monitoring and Profiling Methods for Applications in Energy Management Systems,” IEEE Long Island Systems, Applications and Technology Conference, 2011, 7 pages. |
K. Yang et al. “Series Arc Fault Detection Algorithm Based on Autoregressive Bispecturm Analysis,” Algorithms, vol. 8, Oct. 16, 2015, pp. 929-950. |
J.-E. Park et al., “Design on Topologies for High Efficiency Two-Stage AC-DC Converter,” 2012 IEEE 7th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference—ECCE Asia, Jun. 2-5, 2012, China, 6 pages. |
S. Cuk, “98% Efficient Single-Stage AC/DC Converter Topologies,” Power Electronics Europe, Issue 4, 2011, 6 pages. |
E. Carvou et al., “Electrical Arc Characterization for Ac-Arc Fault Applications,” 2009 Proceedings of the 55th IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, IEEE Explore Oct. 9, 2009, 6 pages. |
C. Restrepo, “Arc Fault Detection and Discrimination Methods,” 2007 Proceedings of the 53rd IEEE Holm Conference on Electrical Contacts, IEEE Explore Sep. 24, 2007, 8 pages. |
K. Eguchi et al., “Design of a Charge-Pump Type AC-DC Converter for RF-ID Tags,” 2006 International Symposium on Communications and Information Technologies, F4D-3, IEEE, 2006, 4 pages. |
A. Ayari et al., “Active Power Measurement Comparison Between Analog and Digital Methods,” International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Software Applications, 2013, 6 pages. |
G. D. Gregory et al., “The Arc-Fault Circuit Interrupter, an Emerging Product,” IEEE, 1998, 8 pages. |
D. Irwin et al., “Exploiting Home Automation Protocols for Load Monitoring in Smart Buildings,” BuildSys '11: Proceedings of the Third ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, Nov. 2011, 6 pages. |
B. Mrazovac et al., “Towards Ubiquitous Smart Outlets for Safety and Energetic Efficiency of Home Electric Appliances,” 2011 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Berlin, German, Sep. 6-8, 2011, 5 pages. |
J. K. Becker et al., “Tracking Anonymized Bluetooth Devices,” Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, vol. 3, 2019, pp. 50-65. |
H. Siadati et al., “Mind your SMSes: Mitigating Social Engineering in Second Factor Authentication,” Computers & Security, vol. 65, Mar. 2017, 12 pages. |
S. Jerde, “The New York Times Can Now Predict Your Emotions and Motivations After Reading a Story,” https://www.adweek.com/tv-video/the-new-york-times-can-now-predict-your-emotions-and-motivations-after-reading-a-story/, Apr. 29, 2019, 3 pages. |
K. Mowery et al., “Pixel Perfect: Fingerprinting Canvas in HTML5,” Proceedings of W2SP, 2012, 12 pages. |
S. Kamkar, “Evercookie,” https://samy.pl/evercookie/, Oct. 11, 2010, 5 pages. |
M. K. Franklin et al., “Fair Exchange with a Semi-Trusted Third Party,” Association for Computing Machinery, 1997, 6 pages. |
J. Camenisch et al., “Digital Payment Systems with Passive Anonymity-Revoking Trustees,” Journal of Computer Security, vol. 5, No. 1, 1997, 11 pages. |
L. Coney et al., “Towards a Privacy Measurement Criterion for Voting Systems,” Proceedings of the 2005 National Conference on Digital Government Research, 2005, 2 pages. |
L. Sweeney, “k-anonymity: A Model for Protecting Privacy,” International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, vol. 1, No. 5, 2002, 14 pages. |
C. Dwork, “Differential Privacy,” Encyclopedia of Cryptography and Security, 2011, 12 pages. |
A. P. Felt et al., “Android Permissions: User Attention, Comprehension, and Behavior,” Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security, Jul. 11-13, 2012, 14 pages. |
S. Von Solms et al., “On Blind Signatures and Perfect Crimes,” Computers & Security, vol. 11, No. 6, 1992, 3 pages. |
R. Wyden, “Wyden Releases Discussion Draft of Legislation to Provide Real Protections for Americans' Privacy,” https://www.wyden.senate.gov/news/press-releases/wyden-releases-discussion-draft-of-legislation-to-provide-real-protections-for-americans-privacy, Nov. 1, 2018, 3 pages. |
M. Rubio, “Rubio Introduces Privacy Bill to Protect Consumers While Promoting Innovation,” https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/2019/1/rubio-introduces-privacy-bill-to-protect-consumers-while-promoting-innovation#:%7E:text=Washingt%E2%80%A6, Jan. 16, 2019, 2 pages. |
C. Dwork et al., “Differential Privacy and Robust Statistics,” 41st ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, 2009, 10 pages. |
J. Camenisch et al., “Compact E-Cash,” Eurocrypt, vol. 3494, 2005, pp. 302-321. |
D. L. Chaum, “Untraceable Electronic Mail, Return Addresses, and Digital Pseudonyms,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 24, No. 2, Feb. 1981, pp. 84-88. |
J. Camenisch et al., “An Efficient System for Nontransferable Anonymous Credentials With Optional Anonymity Revocation,” International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques, May 6-10, 2001, 30 pages. |
M. K. Reiter et al., “Crowds: Anonymity for Web Transactions,” ACM Transactions on Information and System Security, vol. 1, 1997, 23 pages. |
I. Clarke et al., “Freenet: A Distributed Anonymous Information Storage and Retrieval System,” International Workshop on Designing Privacy Enhanching Technologies: Design Issues in Anonymity and Unobservability, 2001, 21 pages. |
P. Golle et al., “Universal Re-encryption for Mixnets,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Feb. 2004, 15 pages. |
Y. Lindell et al., “Multiparty Computation for Privacy Preserving Data Mining,” Journal of Privacy and Confidentiality, May 6, 2008, 39 pages. |
J. Hollan et al., “Distributed Cognition: Toward a New Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, No. 2, Jun. 2000, pp. 174-196. |
A. Adams et al., “Users are Not the Enemy,” Communications of the ACM, Dec. 1999, 6 pages. |
A. Morton et al., “Privacy is a Process, Not a Pet: a Theory for Effective Privacy Practice,” Proceedings of the 2012 New Security Paradigms Workshop, Sep. 2012, 18 pages. |
G. D. Abowd et al., “Charting Past, Present and Future Research in Ubiquitous Computing,” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, vol. 7, No. 1, Mar. 2000, pp. 29-58. |
W. Mason et al., “Conducting Behavioral Research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk,” Behavior Research Methods, Jun. 2011, 23 pages. |
G. M. Gray et al., “Dealing with the Dangers of Fear: The Role of Risk Communication,” Health Affairs, Nov. 2002, 11 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/005,949 filed in the name of Bjorn Markus Jakobsson et al. filed Aug. 28, 2020, and entitled “Privacy and the Management of Permissions.”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/032,759 filed in the name of Mark D. Telefus et al. filed Sep. 25, 2020, and entitled “AC-Driven Light-Emitting Diode Systems.”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/047,613 filed in the name of Mark Telefus et al. filed Oct. 14, 2020, and entitled “Intelligent Circuit Breakers.”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/963,230 filed in the name of Bjorn Markus Jakobsson filed Jan. 20, 2020, and entitled “Infrastructure Support to Enhance Resource-Constrained Device Capabilities.”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 62/964,078 filed in the name of Mark Telefus et al. filed Jan. 21, 2020, and entitled “Intelligent Power Receptacle with Arc Fault Circuit Interruption.”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 63/064,399 filed in the name of Mark Telefus et al. filed Aug. 11, 2020, and entitled “Energy Traffic Monitoring and Control System.”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/145,291 filed in the name of Mark Telefus et al. filed Jan. 9, 2021, and entitled “Building Automation System.”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/153,280 filed in the name of Bjorn Markus Jakobsson filed Jan. 20, 2021, and entitled “Infrastructure Support to Enhance Resource-Constrained Device Capabilities.”. |
U.S. Appl. No. 17/154,625 filed in the name of Mark Telefus et al. filed Jan. 21, 2021, and entitled “Intelligent Circuit Interruption.”. |
Extended European Search Report of EP19869963, dated Jul. 25, 2022, 9 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210119528 A1 | Apr 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 16029549 | Jul 2018 | US |
Child | 17115753 | US |