High power radar systems are an important component of naval warfare systems, but they can be costly to operate and maintain. A study conducted by the Graduate School of Business and Public Policy at the Naval Post Graduate School outlines the issues surrounding life-cycle cost for the several of the key radar components commonly used throughout the U.S. Navy. The report focuses on the Cross-Field Amplifier (CFA) found in the AN/SPY-1 radar system and documents a successful reduction of overall life-cycle cost by implementation of a quality and inventory control programs for the CFA manufacturing and repair. This program alone reduced the operating cost from over $7.00 per operating hour to less than $1.00 per operating hour from 1983 to 2002. However, due to the large number of tubes used throughout the fleet, life-cycle costs are an issue, and even a small reduction in cost per operating hour of $0.01 will lead to a substantial annual cost saving of over $480,000.00 in 2006 dollars.
CFA tubes in the SPY-1 radar system contain several sub-assemblies including the switch tube, switch driver, and high voltage power supplies used in the Final Power Amplifier (FPA) cabinet. Many of these items have been identified as high failure items and severely affect the life-cycle cost of the system. Additionally, the vacuum tube technology used for the switch tube is becoming obsolete with limited manufacturing options further driving up overall life-cycle costs. A solution to this problem would be to replace the electronic switch system with currently available solid-state driver technology. Solid-state switching technology has already been utilized in lower power radar and microwave applications. Wide use and availability of solid-state switching devices could significantly reduce cost. Manufacturing techniques for solid state devices have very high quality control allowing for very long mean time between failures when used in switching power supply applications.
Considerable challenges exist when attempting to replace the high power and high voltage vacuum switch tube and associated systems used for the SPY-1 Radar CFA with solid-state devices. These issues include fault tolerance in high voltage applications, series arrangement of lower voltage devices while maintaining very fast rise/fall time times (˜100 ns), providing the constant current output inherent to the switch tube, overcurrent (arc) detection and suppression and ease of repair with maintaining high voltage isolation. Attempts have been made to provide a solid-state alternative to the switch tube assembly without success. The difficulty of this approach was clearly demonstrated in 1988 by Raytheon Corporation where 80 individual 250 V, Field Effect Transistors (FET) were arranged in a series configuration to provide a high voltage output (˜18 kV). This system addressed many of the issues needed for a suitable switch tube replacement, including fault detection and constant current output.
Advances in solid-state technology have significantly increased device capabilities since 1988, but in many ways the problems associated with the Raytheon constant current, solid-state modulator are the same. Series configurations are still challenging, and at the necessary voltage and power levels may, for example, require many MOSFETs in series, due to maximum operational voltages near 500 V for devices that can source the required current.
Embodiments described herein include a solid-state switch tube replacement for the radar system such as, for example, the SPY-1 radar system. Some embodiments provide for a technology for the precision switching that enables IGBT power modules to operate robustly in a series configuration and/or a parallel configuration to produce precision switching at high voltage (e.g., 20 kV and above) and high frequencies (e.g., 1 MHz and above).
Illustrative embodiments of the present invention are described in detail below with reference to the following figures:
In the appended figures, similar components and/or features may have the same reference label. Further, various components of the same type may be distinguished by following the reference label by a dash and a second label that distinguishes among the similar components. If only the first reference label is used in the specification, the description is applicable to any one of the similar components having the same first reference label irrespective of the second reference label
A robust, modular, IGBT-based system that has capabilities that can provide a solid-state solution to replace common radar switch tubes is disclosed in various embodiments. In some embodiments, the IGBT system may be used to replace tubes in a SPY-1 CFA radars. In some embodiments this Integrated Power Module (IPM) is an innovative IGBT-based system designed as a high power, RF tube replacement module. The system can be modular Sc to allow for easy series/parallel configuration for several applications. Each module can be capable of high power switching at high frequency.
Embodiments described herein may include one or more of the following, be Sa capable of performing one or more of the following and/or have one or more of the following advantages:
IGBT triggering and switching control can be accomplished via, for example, a fiber optic receiver that is, for example, capable of over 155 megabit per second data rates in combination with fast (e.g., <5 ns) logic. This combination can, for example, allow for extremely fast, high current IGBT gate control allowing for high power switching while reducing board-to-board jitter. The board may also incorporate a low inductance high current connector block to allow for both parallel and series configurations. When assembled each unit may be fully shielded for EMI protection.
The IPM can have, for example, a voltage rating of 1200 kV at 2500 A pulsed. Various other voltage values and current values may also be used. For example, a voltage rating above 800 kV and currents above 1500 A may be produced. These ratings, however, far exceeds what is necessary for a CFA switch tube replacement. A single IGBT channel of the IPM module can be used and arranged into a single board series configuration, which can be capable of the switching, for example, 20 kV with a continuous current rating of 40 A.
In some embodiments, for example, a series configuration of approximately 20 channels can be produced and tested as we have confidence that the necessary rise and fall times can be obtained with 1200 V IGBTs currently used in the IPM module. The fast switching capability of the new 20 kV module is critical, as it is necessary to allow for the pulse-width modulation (PWM) of the switch tube replacement to maintain relatively constant current output. The innovative design for fast PWM, constant current control will be discussed in detail in the technical objective section. Higher voltage discrete IGBTs are available up to 4 kV ratings at the necessary output current levels. In some embodiments, if rise/fall time can be maintained with higher voltage IGBTs then the total number of series channels can correspondingly be reduced.
As stated above, series operation of IGBT configurations can be difficult, especially for high frequency operation (e.g., ˜1 MHz), and switching jitter from one IGBT module to another may be minimized for robust operation.
Some embodiments can use larger series stacks of IGBTs operating at higher voltage and current levels. In some embodiments these IGBT stacks can be designed and constructed in a series stack using twelve IPMs, which was utilized as an electron gun driver. This system was designed for nominal output of −10 kV and 500 A and 14.4 kV peak and 1 kA.
Series stacking of IGBT modules is critical to produce a reasonably sized solid-state switch tube replacement. However a high voltage IGBT switch alone will not mimic the near constant current output of the tetrode switch tube. The near constant current behavior for the switch tube is desirable so that output power of the CFA is held nearly constant as frequency is adjusted. In fact due to the very low impedance of the IGBTs they will effectively act as a near constant voltage source meaning sudden load changes of the CFA dynamic impedance will be meet with an increase or decrease in CFA current. Maintaining constant current in the CFA for changes in dynamic impedance may be a difficult challenge for the solid-state replacement.
In some embodiments, the switch current can be regulated. This method can effectively use the FET to change its dynamic impedance by selecting appropriate gate drive and feedback resistors to control the FET.
In some embodiments, a simple buck converter topology utilizing a filter capacitor, a solid state switch and inductor can be employed to accomplish a constant current output. A small inductor may be included that not only saves on size and cost of the power supply but limits the amount of stray capacitance that can reduce charging speeds.
To successfully replace the CFA switch tube and associated systems with solid-state technology while meeting the specified rise/fall and constant current specifications can be a difficult task. A novel high voltage IGBT-based switching design that incorporates the use of the fast switching, high voltage series stacking, and the 1 MHz PWM capability of an IPM system to provide a reliable solid-state solution for a switch tube replacement is disclosed.
A circuit diagram for a driver system is shown in
With this large inductance, this buck converter operating alone would not be capable of producing the fast rise and fall times for the CFA driver application. To accomplish the fast rise, two additional switches were added. To start the pulse, the PWM switch and tailbiter switch (S2) are both closed allowing current to ramp up through L4. During this time, there is no significant voltage across the load. Once the current reaches the nominal level, the tailbiter switch opens allowing the voltage to appear across the CFA. At this time the fast rise switch (S6) closes for 100 ns to rapidly charge the 80 pF capacitance in the CFA. This allows the current to rise in approximately 100 ns. By adjusting the resistance (R9) and inductance (L2) in this branch, the exact rise time can be dialed to reach any value in the range 75-125 ns while achieving a cathode voltage slew rate of 80-130 kV/μs at 70%.
At the same time the fast rise switch closed, the PWM switch begins modulating the output of the buck to maintain a flat current profile for the CFA and continues for 100 μs. At the end of the pulse, the PWM switch is opened and the tailbiter switch is closed a second time. This rapidly discharges the 80 pF capacitance of the CFA in 150 ns. Any potential turnoff spike or oscillation is damped by the LCR filter (L3, C2, and R11).
Some embodiments can include an IPM Module in a 20 kV Series Configuration. Some embodiments can include an IPM for series configuration that includes additional fiber optic fans outs and isolated low voltage control. Some embodiments can include an IPM module as a 20 kV, 40 A, CFA Driver System.
Some embodiments can include a high voltage (20 kV or more) module that will be used as the basic solid-state switch. This switch can include a single channel design of an IPM module and to place that design into a series arrangement onto a single PCB board. The board design, for example, can incorporate all of the low inductance enhancements and/or component arrangement, which allow for incredibly fast switching of the IPM module.
Some embodiments can include a driver system.
The use of the independent switches to control rise/fall time along with the PWM switch decouples the issue of constant current output for the system. After the initial voltage on the CFA is obtained using the rise time switches, the PWM switch is used to maintain constant current.
Here the PWM switch maintains the preprogrammed output current at the start of the pulse. After which the dynamic impedance is modeled to make a discrete change 50 μs into the pulse. The PWM switch responds to the change in impedance with a shift in pulse width, which reduces the load voltage and retains the constant current in the CFA. The current trace in
As the L4 becomes ever larger issues with overall size, weight, and cost of this item become relevant. In the SPICE modeling above, L4 has an inductance of 30 mH. This high voltage inductor is very reasonable to make, and we estimate that will have an approximate volume of 6 in3 with a weight around 10-20 lbs and cost approximately $1000.00 for single builds. However, typical switching frequencies for high power IGBT based systems are usually around 50 kHz. The corresponding inductor to accomplish the same task in this application is proportionally larger more complex and expensive. Additionally the amount of stored energy in the inductor is also much higher meaning more damage to the CFA if there is a switch failure. If the first objective produces a high voltage IPM unit then configuring them into the three switch configuration and testing is straight forward. The technical challenge will to minimize stray reactive elements that might lead to additional noise on the system. It is expected that testing with fine adjustments to the IPM modules will occur during this objective.
Some embodiments include a design that includes thermal management and/or system controller that will be able to control the PWM feedback as well as fault detection and mitigation. As stated above each IPM module can have the ability to detect overcurrent and overvoltage. Some embodiments can include a fault detection and controller for other series arrangement of IGBTs, which can monitor the individual channels for faults and shut down the system upon detection. The InterLock Controller (ILC) shown in
The ensuing description provides various embodiments of the invention only, and is not intended to limit the scope, applicability or configuration of the disclosure. Rather, the ensuing description of the embodiments will provide those skilled in the art with an enabling description for implementing an embodiment. It should be understood that various changes may be made in the function and arrangement of elements without departing from the spirit and scope as set forth in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5313481 | Cook et al. | May 1994 | A |
5321597 | Alacoque | Jun 1994 | A |
5392043 | Ribner | Feb 1995 | A |
5808504 | Chikai et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5905646 | Crewson | May 1999 | A |
6320362 | Baek | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6359542 | Widmayer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6577135 | Matthews et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6741120 | Tan | May 2004 | B1 |
6831377 | Yampolsky | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6897574 | Vaysse | May 2005 | B2 |
6900557 | Gaudreau | May 2005 | B1 |
7061230 | Kleine | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7180082 | Hassanein | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7307375 | Smith et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7319579 | Inoue et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7492138 | Zhang et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7605385 | Bauer | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7901930 | Kuthi et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7948185 | Smith et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
8093979 | Wilson | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8115343 | Sanders et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8143790 | Smith et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8624536 | Zhao | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8723591 | Lee | May 2014 | B2 |
8773184 | Petrov | Jul 2014 | B1 |
8963377 | Ziemba et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9329265 | Murad | May 2016 | B2 |
20010008552 | Harada | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20030169107 | LeChevalier | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20060210020 | Takahashi | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20070018504 | Wiener et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070115705 | Gotzenberger | May 2007 | A1 |
20080062733 | Gay | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080143260 | Tuymer | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080198634 | Scheel | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20100007358 | Schaerrer | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100284208 | Nguyen | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20120138123 | Newdoll | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120155613 | Caiafa | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20130113650 | Behbahani et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140109886 | Singleton et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140146571 | Ryoo | May 2014 | A1 |
20140268968 | Richardson | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140354343 | Ziemba et al. | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150028932 | Ziemba et al. | Jan 2015 | A1 |
20150070802 | Dong | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150076372 | Ziemba et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150130525 | Miller et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150256086 | Miller et al. | Sep 2015 | A1 |
20150303914 | Ziemba et al. | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20150318846 | Prager et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160065127 | Newdoll | Mar 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1515430 | Mar 2005 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Bland, M., et al., “A High Power RF Power Supply for High Energy Physics Applications,” Proceedings of the Particle Accelerator Conference, Knoxville, TN, May 16-20, 2005, pp. 4018-4020. |
In, Y., et al., “On the roles of direct feedback and error field correction in stabilizing resistive-wall modes,” Nuclear Fusion, 2010, retrieved from p://stacks.iop.org/NF/50/042001 on Apr. 12, 2012, vol. 50, No. 4, 5 pages. |
Kim, J., et al., “High Voltage Pulsed Power Supply Using IGBT Stacks,” IEEE Transactions on Dielectrics and Electrical Insulation, Aug. 2007, vol. 14, No. 4, 921-926. |
Locher, R., “Introduction to Power MOSFETs and their Applications (Application Note 558),” Fairchild Semiconductor, Oct. 1998, 15 pages. |
Locher, R., et al., “Use of BiMOSFETs in Modern Radar Transmitters,” IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, Indonesia, 2001, pp. 776-782. |
Reass, W., et al., “Progress Towards a 20 KV, 2 KA Plasma Source Ion Implantation Modulator for Automotive Production of Diamond Film on Aluminum,” Submitted to 22nd International Power Symposium, Boca Raton, FL, Jun. 24-27, 1996, 6 pages. |
Scoville, J., et al., “The Resistive Wall Mode Feedback Control System on DIII-D,” IEEE/NPSS 18th Symposium on Fusion Engineering, Albuquerque, NM, Oct. 25-29, 1999, General Atomics Report GAA23256, Nov. 1999, 7 pages. |
Zavadtsev, D., et al., “Compact Electron Linear Accelerator RELUS-5 for Radiation Technology Application,” 10th European Particle Accelerator Conference, Edinburgh, UK, Jun. 26-30, 2006, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Sep. 15, 2014 as received in PCT Application No. PCT/US2014/04029. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Feb. 20, 2015 in related PCT application No. PCT/US2014/065832 (14 pages). |
A. Starikovskiy and N. Aleksandrov, “Plasma-assisted ignition and combustion,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 39, Feb. 1, 2013, pp. 61-110. |
Gaudet, J., et al, “Research Issues in Developing Compact Pulsed Power for High Peak Power Applications on Mobile Platforms,” Proc. IEEE, 92, Jun. 7, 2004, pp. 1144-1165. |
D.A. Singleton et al. “Compact Pulsed-Power System for Transient Plasma Ignition,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 37, Aug. 12, 2009 pp. 2275-2279. |
Wang, F., “Compact High Repetition Rate Pseudospark Pulse Generator,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 33, Aug. 4, 2005 pp. 1177-1181. |
Singleton, D. R., “Low Energy Compact Power Modulators for Transient Plasma Ignition,” IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 18, Aug. 4, 2011, pp. 1084-1090. |
Rao, X., et al., “Combustion Dynamics of Plasma-Enhansed Premixed and Nonpremixed Flames,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 38, Nov. 12, 2010 pp. 3265-3271. |
Pokryvailo, A., et al, “A 1KW Pulsed Corona System for Pollution Control Applications.” 14th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference, Dallas, TX, USA, Jun. 15-18, 2003. |
Pokryvailo, A., et al, “High-Power Pulsed Corona for Treatment of Pollutants in Heterogeneous Media,” IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci., 34, Oct. 5, 2006, pp. 1731-1743. |
Dammertz, G., et al, “Development of Multimegawatt Gyrotrons for Fusion Plasma Heating and Current Drive,” IEEE Trans. Elec. Devices., 52, Apr. 5, 2005, pp. 808-817. |
Zhu, Z., et al, “High Voltage pulser with a fast fall-time for plasma immersion ion implantation,” Review Sci Inst., 82, 045102, Apr. 2011. |
Sanders, J., et al, “Scalable, Compact, Nanosecond Pulse Generation with a High Repetition Rate for Biomedical Applications Requiring Intense Electric Fields,” Pulsed Power Conference, 2009. PPC '09. IEEE, Washington, DC, Jun. 28, 2009-Jul. 2, 2009. |
Schamiloglu, E., et al, “Scanning the Technology: Modern Pulsed Power: Charlie Martin and Beyond,” Proc. IEEE, 92, Jun. 7, 2004, pp. 1014-1020. |
Garwin, Richard, “Pulsed Power Peer Review Committee Report,” Sandia National Laboratories Report, SAND2000-2515, Oct. 2000. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Oct. 6, 2015 in related PCT application No. PCT/US2015/040204 (15 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 14, 2015 in related PCT application No. PCT/US15/18349 (11 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150303914 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61931818 | Jan 2014 | US |