Patent Application
20160168722
The invention concerns a solution and a process to treat copper alloy surfaces so that a tight bond can be subsequently formed between the treated copper surfaces and polymeric material. The solution preferably serves to treat surfaces of lead frames made of copper alloys containing alloying elements selected from the group of Si, Ni, Fe, Zr, P, Sn.
In manufacturing lead frames and printed circuit boards alike, various steps are carried out in which copper surfaces must be tightly bonded to an organic substrate. In some cases, the required adhesion of the formed bonds must be ensured over a long period. In other cases, a tight bond only has to exist for a short period, e.g. when a polymeric material only remains on the copper or copper alloy surfaces during manufacture of the workpiece.
The easiest way to increase the adhesion is to etch and hence roughen the copper surfaces before forming the bond. Microetching solutions have long been used in the production of printed circuit boards and contain for example sulfuric acid solutions of hydrogen peroxide or sodium peroxodisulfate.
Another procedure is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,645,772. A treatment solution is used for the copper surfaces that e.g. contains 5-aminotetrazole.
Long-term stability is especially necessary when encapsulating molding compounds (polymeric material) into lead frames.
Various procedures for pretreating printed circuit boards have been developed. Commonly, before lamination an oxide layer on the copper surfaces is formed. In this process, known as the brown or black oxide process, very aggressive reaction conditions are used to form the oxide. A disadvantage of this procedure is that the oxide layer used for enhancing adhesion to the polymeric material is not very resistant to acid and especially to hydrochloric treatment solutions. They are hence attacked in subsequent processes for plating the through-holes in the boards. The adhesive bond is eliminated, and delamination occurs at the attacked sites (pink ring: An externally-visible attack on the black oxide layer directly next to a hole in printed circuit boards with the discoloration of the originally black oxide layer.
The above-cited problem is solved by reducing the oxide layer surface before lamination. The reduced black oxide is more stable than normal black oxide against chemicals used in plating the through-holes. The additional reduction step costs a great deal, however. In addition, the chemicals used for reduction are not very resistant to oxidation from air, so that the useful life of the baths and storage life of the supplementary chemicals are limited. An attempt to eliminate this problem is made in JP A 08097559. The reduced copper oxide layers are provided with a protective layer by treating them with an aqueous solution containing an aminothiazole and/or aminobenzothiazole compound. However, the problems of expensive reduction chemicals, their low resistance to oxidation and the layer's sensitivity to acid are not completely eliminated.
Another option for promoting adhesion is to treat the copper surfaces with an aqueous or alcoholic solution of an azole compound. Such a procedure is e.g. presented in WO 96/19097 A1. The copper surfaces are treated with a solution that contains 0.1-20 weight percent hydrogen peroxide, an inorganic acid (e.g. sulfuric acid), an organic corrosion inhibitor (e.g. benzotrizole), and a wetting agent. The hydrogen peroxide etches the copper surface to produce microrough surfaces.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,869,130 describes a process for treating metal surfaces with a composition comprising an oxidizer, an acid, a corrosion inhibitor, a source of halide ions and optionally a water soluble polymer in order to increase the adhesion of polymeric materials to the metal surface.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,562,149 B1 discloses processes and solutions for the preliminary treatment of copper surfaces which are subsequently to be firmly bonded to organic substrates. The solution is used, in particular, for firmly bonding laminated multilayered printed circuit boards and for firmly bonding resists to the copper surfaces of printed circuit boards. The solutions contain (a) hydrogen peroxide; (b) at least one acid; (c) at least one nitrogen-containing, five-membered heterocyclic compound which does not contain any sulphur, selenium or tellurium atom in the heterocycle; and (d) at least one adhesive compound from the group consisting of sulfinic acids, seleninic acids, tellurinic acids, heterocyclic compounds containing at least one sulphur, selenium and/or tellurium atom in the heterocycle, and sulfonium, selenonium and telluronium salts.
However, as compared to the printed circuit board production the common metallic substrates used for lead frames are copper alloys with a certain, relatively low amount of alloying elements, required to achieve the mechanical and electrical properties sought.
Some alloys, however, are only partially attacked or with a reduced reaction rate. This leads to unsatisfactory roughness or insoluble residues or smut on the alloy surface. The result in both cases in a non optimized adhesion improvement achieved by the process.
The present invention is therefore based on the problem of avoiding the disadvantages of the state of the art and finding a treatment solution and a process that can create a tight bond between the copper alloy surfaces and polymeric material surfaces and is at the same time suitable to treat a wide range of different copper alloy compositions. The process should be simple, easy to use, and inexpensive. It is also important that treatment with the solutions produce a material bond that is not problematic (no smut formation, decomposition of the pre-treatment solution etc.). The used treatment solutions should therefore be particularly suitable for manufacturing lead frames.
This problem is solved by the solution cited in claim 1 and the treatment process cited in claim 23.
The solution according to the invention is for treating copper alloy surfaces to allow a tight bond to be formed with plastic materials, and it comprises:
Adhesion-enhancing compounds are to be selected that are sufficiently soluble in the acidic, preferably sulfuric acid solution.
The process according to the invention is carried out by bringing the copper alloy surfaces into contact with the solution.
The solution is also suitable for treatment of copper alloy surfaces, thereafter depositing a second metal layer on the such treated copper alloy surface and finally bond a polymeric material thereto. The second metal layer can for example be a deposit of Ni—Pd—Au or Ag, forming a solderable layer.
By roughening the copper alloy surface with a treatment solution according to claim 1, the adhesion properties of the polymeric material to the second metal layer are also greatly enhanced, which can be seen from the Example 4.
Preferred embodiments of the invention are the subject-matter of dependent claims 2-22.
For example adhesion-enhancing compounds selected from the group consisting of triazoles, benzotriazoles, imidazoles, tetrazoles, purines and mixtures thereof may be used. These compounds react with the copper alloy surfaces to form a protective complex layer.
Preferred tetrazole compounds are 5-aminotetrazole and 5-phenyltetrazole. A preferred imidazole compound may be benzimidazole. 5-aminotetrazole, 5-phenyltetrazole, benzotriazole, methylbenzotriazole and ethylbenzotriazole are preferred compounds given their favorable solubility in the treatment solution and their availability.
Preferred combinations are benzotriazole, methylbenzotriazole, ethylbenzotriazole, 5-aminotetrazole and 5-phenyltetrazole as the nitrogen-containing, heterocyclic compounds with aminothiophene carboxylic acids, their esters and amides, aminothiazoles and substituted aminothiazoles as the heterocyclic compounds.
In order to improve the long-term stability of the bond between the metal surface and the polymeric material, a mixture of at least one nitrogen-containing, five-membered heterocyclic compound that does not contain sulfur, selenium or tellurium atoms in the heterocycle and at least one adhesion-promoting compound selected from the group consisting of sulfinic acids, selenic acids, telluric acids, heterocyclic compounds that contain at least one sulfur, selenium and/or tellurium atom in the heterocycle, as well as sulfonium, selenonium and telluronium salts, where the sulfonium, selenonium and telluronium salts are compounds of general formula A:
where A is S, Se or Te, R1, R2 and R3 is alkyl, substituted alkyl, alkenyl, phenyl, substituted phenyl, benzyl, cycloalkyl and substituted cycloalkyl, where R1, R2 and R3 can be the same or different, and X− is the anion of an inorganic or organic acid or hydroxide, with the proviso that the acid according to component b) is not identical to a sulfinic, selenic or telluric acid according to component d), is applied.
Preferred sulfinic acids are compounds of chemical formula B:
wherein R4, R5 and R6 are selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, phenyl, substituted phenyl and R7—(CO)— wherein R7 is hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, phenyl or substituted phenyl, where R4, R5 and R6 can be the same or different.
It is preferable for the solution to contain formamidine sulfinic acid. Preferable aromatic sulfinic acids are benzene sulfinic acid, toluene sulfinic acids, chlorobenzene sulfinic acids, nitrobenzene sulfinic acids and carboxybenzene sulfinic acids.
Other preferable adhesion-promoting heterocyclic compounds are thiophene, thiazole, isothiazole, thiadiazole and thiatriazole.
Suitable thiophenes are compounds of chemical formula C:
wherein R8, R9, R10, R11 are selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, phenyl, substituted phenyl, halogen, amino, alkylamino, dialkylamino, hydroxy, alkoxy, carboxy, carboxyalkyl, alkoxycarbonyl, aminocarbonyl and R12—CONH— wherein R12 is hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, phenyl or substituted phenyl, where R8, R9, R10 and R11 can be the same or different and can be a part of the homo- or heterocyclic ring condensed onto the thiophene ring.
Particularly preferred thiophenes are aminothiophene carboxylic acids, their esters and amides. For example, 3-aminothiophene-2-carboxylic acid methyl ester can be advantageously used.
Suitable thiazoles are compounds of chemical formula D:
wherein R13, R14, R15 are selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, phenyl, substituted phenyl, halogen, amino, alkylamino, dialkylamino, hydroxy, alkoxy, carboxy, carboxyalkyl, alkoxycarbonyl, aminocarbonyl and R16—CONH— wherein R16 is hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, phenyl or substituted phenyl, where R13, R14 and R15 can be the same or different and can be a part of the homo- or heterocyclic ring condensed onto the thiazole ring.
Particularly suitable thiazoles are aminothiazole and substituted aminothiazole.
Other preferred thiadiazole adhesion-promoting compounds are from the group consisting of aminothiadiazoles and substituted aminothiadiazoles.
In addition, the preferred sulfonium salts are salts of trimethylsulfonium, triphenylsulfonium, methionine alkylsulfonium and methionine benzylsulfonium.
The nitrogen-containing, five-member heterocyclic compounds that do not contain any sulfur, selenium or tellurium atom in the heterocycle can be monocyclic and polycyclic condensed ring systems. For example, the compounds can contain an anellated benzene, naphthalene or pyrimidine ring provided that they are sufficiently soluble in the acid solution. It is preferable for the solution to contain triazoles, tetrazoles, imidazoles, pyrazoles and purines or their derivatives.
In particular, the solution contains triazoles of chemical formula E1:
wherein R17, R18 are selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, amino, phenyl, substituted phenyl and carboxyalkyl, where R17 and R18 can be the same or different and can be a part of the homo- or heterocyclic ring condensed onto the triazole ring.
Benzotriazole, methylbenzotriazole, ethylbenzotriazole and dimethylbenzotriazole are particularly preferable.
In addition, the solution can contain tetrazoles of chemical formula E2:
wherein R19 is selected from the group consisting of hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, halogenalkyl, amino, phenyl, substituted phenyl, benzyl, carboxy, carboxyalkyl, alkoxycarbonyl, aminocarbonyl and R20—CONH wherein R20 is hydrogen, alkyl, substituted alkyl, phenyl or substituted phenyl.
Preferred tetrazole compounds are 5-aminotetrazole and 5-phenyltetrazole. A preferred imidazole compound may be benzimidazole. 5-aminotetrazole, 5-phenyltetrazole, benzotriazole, methylbenzotriazole and ethylbenzotriazole are preferred compounds given their favorable solubility in the treatment solution and their availability.
Preferred combinations are benzotriazole, methylbenzotriazole, ethylbenzotriazole, 5-aminotetrazole and 5-phenyltetrazole as the nitrogen-containing, heterocyclic compounds with aminothiophene carboxylic acids, their esters and amides, aminothiazoles and substituted aminothiazoles as the heterocyclic compounds.
The process according to the invention is an extremely easy way to treat copper alloy surfaces to allow them to tightly bond with polymeric materials. Basically one step is necessary, i.e., treating the copper or copper alloy surface with the solution according to the invention to allow them to bond with polymeric materials. The adhesion does not decrease even after a long time. Particularly preferred solutions are the subject-matter of claim 7.
The advantageous effect of the solution according to the invention was surprising since it was found that relatively small amounts of chloride and bromide of 50 mg/I and above already strongly reduce the functionality of the etching solution. Applying such solutions is disclosed in the prior art (U.S. Pat. No. 5,869,130) for treating copper surfaces but is not suitable to etch copper alloy surfaces which is the subject of the present invention.
In contrast, the addition of fluoride improves the complete attack onto these alloys and leads to the desired roughness properties of the copper alloy surface. Alloys containing Si in particular, are most effectively treated, as the Si smut on the surface as well as in the solution is removed within the etching solution itself. Without the addition of fluoride, insoluble residues are formed, which lead to low adhesion values and uneven appearance, not acceptable in lead frame manufacturing. Furthermore the alloying elements often result in a decrease of the stability of the treatment solution. Dissolved iron for example catalyses the decomposition of hydrogen peroxide. Surprisingly, addition of fluoride prevents such decomposition while in contrast chloride and bromide do not reduce the decomposition rate of the treatment solution.
The properties of lead frame alloy surfaces become more and more important as a result of the lead free soldering applications for the electronic industry. Lead free soldering generates higher temperatures to the electronic components. Because of higher soldering temperatures the risk of the “popcorn effect” rises. This effect arises, when humidity penetrates the device and the water evaporates explosively upon heating during the post-treatment steps and destroys the bond between the polymeric material and the metal surface. This effect destroys electronic devices. A good adhesion of the polymeric material to the metal substrate minimizes the risk of the “popcorn effect” to occur.
As a result of the good adhesion gained by applying the solution according to the present invention, no air moisture can penetrate into the interface polymeric material/metal substrate.
The fluoride ion amount additionally affects the etch rate of the metal surface. In a certain range increase in the fluoride ion concentration results in an increased etch rate. Applying the solution according to Example 1 with a sodium fluoride concentration of 2.5 g/I results in an etch rate of 1.0 μm/min. If the solution contains 5.0 g/I sodium fluoride the etch rate is increased to 1.6 μm/min. Thereafter, further increasing the fluoride ion concentration does not affect the etch rate significantly. It has to be pointed out that the optimum amount of fluoride ions for a given metal depends on its composition and can be determined individually by standard measurement methods.
As mentioned above, the solution according to the present invention also comprises chloride ions in an amount of 5 to 40 mg per litre. It was discovered that the chloride ions have a beneficial effect on the roughness of the surface to which the solution according to the present invention is applied. Particularly good results are obtained when the concentration of chloride ions is in the range of 15 to 25 mg per litre.
In the present invention the adhesion between the alloy substrate and the polymeric material is measured quantitatively in values N/mm2.
The peel strength was measured by pushing “Mold tablets” after curing and hardening, with a contact area to the test surface of 10 mm2 with a Dage 4000 equipment, using a shear speed of 0.2 mm/s. The test was performed at 20° C.
In the production of lead frames, an important and widely used Si-containing alloy is C7025. Besides Cu and Ni it contains up to 1.2% of silicon.
Another alloy which is particularly preferred for use in the present invention is C194. It contains 97% of Cu, 2.3% of Fe and 0.1% of Mn. Like the above mentioned C7025 alloy, C194 is used in the production of lead frames.
The copper alloy surfaces should first be cleaned to ensure that the treatment is effective. Any conventional cleaning solution can be used. Normally, wetting agents and sometimes complexing agents (such as triethanol-amine)-containing aqueous solutions are used.
After the cleaned copper alloy surfaces are rinsed, they can be brought into contact with a so-called predipping solution that contains one of the five-membered heterocyclic compounds dissolved in water, preferably at a concentration of 0.1-10 g/I, and especially 0.5-2 g/I. This treatment helps the adhesion-promoting layer to be formed in the subsequent treatment step. In particular, any delays in the formation of the layer are avoided. The layer starts forming directly when the surface contacts the solution of the invention.
The surfaces are then treated with the solution according to the invention without being rinsed beforehand.
The microetching by the oxidant, preferably hydrogen peroxide in connection with the acid yields microrough copper alloy surfaces. Since this increases the surface area, the subsequent adhesion of the copper alloy surfaces to the polymeric material also increases. The change in color of the surface during treatment is caused by a thin copper oxide layer. It is preferable for the acid in the solution according to the invention to be an inorganic acid, and especially sulfuric acid. Other acids can of course be used.
The treatment is preferably carried out at 20-60° C. The treatment time is preferably 10-600 sec. The higher the temperature, the faster-acting the solution. The treatment times can hence even be much shorter. From a practical standpoint, a preferable average temperature would be 35-45° C. to better control the reaction. Average treatment times are 20-90 sec. In addition, a top temperature limit may have to be set due to possible incompatibilities between certain solution components at high temperatures, e.g., wetting agents that have difficulty dissolving at high temperatures.
The preferable concentration ranges in the solution are:
Further components:
After they are treated with the solution according to the invention, the copper surfaces are rinsed. Then they are dried, e.g. with hot air.
The workpieces, for example lead frames, with the copper or copper alloy surfaces can be treated in conventional dipping systems.
The following examples serve further to clarify the invention:
An aqueous solution was created by mixing the following components:
The solution was heated to 40° C., and a copper alloy surface (lead frame C7025) containing Cu, Ni (2.2-4.2%), Si (0.25-1.2%) and small amounts of Mg and Zn was dipped in the solution for 60 sec. After being treated, the alloy was rinsed with deionized water and finally dried.
Thereafter as polymeric material a commercially available mold (KMC-289, Shinetsu) was applied to such treated alloy surface, dried and hardened at a temperature of 175° C.
The peel strength of the lead frame was measured by a button shear test. An adhesion value of 18.5 N/mm2 was found. The measured roughness, expressed in RSAI (Relative Surface Area Increase) was 44%±3% (absolute).
Example 1 was repeated with a solution that did not contain sodium fluoride.
The lead frame surface shows black smut which can easily be taken away by finger wiping. On this sample a peel adhesion value of only 9.1 N/mm2 was obtained. The measured roughness was 42%±3% (absolute).
Example 1 was repeated with a solution that did not contain sodium chloride.
The lead frame surface shows not black smut, but the roughness was reduced to lower than 12% RSAI. The peel adhesion value was always below 5 N/mm2.
An aqueous solution was created by mixing the following components:
The solution was heated to 40° C., and a copper alloy surface (lead frame C7025) containing Cu, Ni (2.2-4.2%), Si (0.25-1.2%) and small amounts of Mg and Zn was dipped in the solution for 60 sec. After being treated, the alloy was rinsed with deionized water and finally dried.
Thereafter, a layer of Ni—Pd—Au was deposited on the treated copper alloy surface utilizing a commercially available metallization process (Atotech Deutschland GmbH).
Finally, as polymeric material a commercially available mold (KMC-289, Shinetsu) was applied to such treated alloy surface, dried and hardened at a temperature of 150° C.
An adhesion value was achieved which is slightly smaller than that according to Example 1.
Example 4 was repeated but with a solution that did not contain sodium fluoride.
The lead frame surfaces shows smut residues and had therefore to be cleaned in an additional post treatment step utilizing 50 ml/l H2SO4 96%, 20 g/I sodium peroxodisulfate and 4 g/I sodium fluoride instead of 5% H2SO4 prior to metallization with Ni—Pd—Au. As a result only a poor peel adhesion value was obtained.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 06003278.6 | Feb 2006 | EP | regional |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 12224016 | Sep 2008 | US |
| Child | 15041840 | US |
