Solvent separation in a solvent-dominated recovery process

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8752623
  • Patent Number
    8,752,623
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 10, 2011
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, June 17, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
In solvent-dominated recovery processes for recovering In situ oil, including bitumen, the produced fluid stream includes oil and solvent. The solvent is preferably recovered and reinjected into the reservoir. In previously described methods, solvent is removed from the oil/solvent mixture. In the present method, the oil/solvent mixture is first separated into a heavier stream and a lighter stream from which solvent is independently removed.
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from Canadian Patent Application 2,693,640 filed Feb. 17, 2010 entitled SOLVENT SEPARATION IN A SOLVENT-DOMINATED RECOVERY PROCESS, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.


FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is in the field of In situ hydrocarbon recovery. More particularly, the present invention relates to solvent separation in a solvent-dominated recovery process.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

At the present time, solvent-dominated recovery processes (SDRPs) are rarely used to produce highly viscous oil. Highly viscous oils are produced primarily using thermal methods in which heat, typically in the form of steam, is added to the reservoir. Cyclic solvent-dominated recovery processes (CSDRPs) are a subset of SDRPs. A CSDRP is typically, but not necessarily, a non-thermal recovery method that uses a solvent to mobilize viscous oil by cycles of injection and production. Solvent-dominated means that the injectant comprises greater than 50% by mass of solvent or that greater than 50% of the produced oil's viscosity reduction is obtained by chemical solvation rather than by thermal means. One possible laboratory method for roughly comparing the relative contribution of heat and dilution to the viscosity reduction obtained in a proposed oil recovery process is to compare the viscosity obtained by diluting an oil sample with a solvent to the viscosity reduction obtained by heating the sample.


In a CSDRP, a viscosity-reducing solvent is injected through a well into a subterranean viscous-oil reservoir, causing the pressure to increase. Next, the pressure is lowered and reduced-viscosity oil is produced to the surface through the same well through which the solvent was injected. Multiple cycles of injection and production are used. In some instances, a well may not undergo cycles of injection and production, but only cycles of injection or only cycles of production.


CSDRPs may be particularly attractive for thinner or lower-oil-saturation reservoirs. In such reservoirs, thermal methods utilizing heat to reduce viscous oil viscosity may be inefficient due to excessive heat loss to the overburden and/or underburden and/or reservoir with low oil content.


References describing specific CSDRPs include: Canadian Patent No. 2,349,234 (Lim et al.); G. B. Lim et al., “Three-dimensional Scaled Physical Modeling of Solvent Vapour Extraction of Cold Lake Bitumen”, The Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 35(4), pp. 32-40, April 1996; G. B. Lim et al., “Cyclic Stimulation of Cold Lake Oil Sand with Supercritical Ethane”, SPE Paper 30298, 1995; U.S. Pat. No. 3,954,141 (Allen et al.); and M. Feali et al., “Feasibility Study of the Cyclic VAPEX Process for Low Permeable Carbonate Systems”, International Petroleum Technology Conference Paper 12833, 2008.


The family of processes within the Lim et al. references describe embodiments of a particular SDRP that is also a cyclic solvent-dominated recovery process (CSDRP). These processes relate to the recovery of heavy oil and bitumen from subterranean reservoirs using cyclic injection of a solvent in the liquid state which vaporizes upon production. The family of processes within the Lim et al. references may be referred to as CSP™ processes.


Solvent-dominated recovery processes (SDRP)s may involve the addition of hydrocarbon solvents (such as propane) to an underground oil reservoir, including a reservoir of viscous oil such as bitumen, to mix with and lower the viscosity of the bitumen, and allow it to be produced. The hydrocarbon portion of the produced mixture includes the solvent and produced oil, in a vapor phase and one or more liquid phases. Depending on the particular pressure and composition, the liquid portion can be in two liquid phases. Previously described SDRPs, such as CSP™ technology, an example of which is described in Canadian Patent No. 2,349,234, involve flashing the solvent in the entire produced mixture, leaving a single produced oil phase. The solvent may then be re-injected into the reservoir.


Whereas in such SDRPs, the solvent is present in the oil stream, in certain instances outside the field of In situ oil recovery, oils are refined through the addition of a solvent, which solvent is then removed from the refined oil. Solvent deasphalting in a refinery environment is known. For instance, U.S. Pat. No. 4,125,458 describes a process to simultaneously deasphalt-extract a mineral oil feedstock comprising both asphaltene and aromatic components. Suitable feedstocks are said to include whole crude oils, atmospheric and vacuum residua, and mixtures thereof having initial boiling points ranging from 500 to 1,100° F. at atmospheric pressure. The feed is contacted with a deasphalting-extraction solvent in one or more mixer-settler units or in one or more countercurrent liquid-liquid converting towers. The solvent is then flashed off from the mixture.


The following four references also relate to the use of solvent to purify an oil feed. U.S. Pat. No. 6,174,431 relates generally to the recovery and regeneration of used lubricant and industrial oils and more specifically to the treatment and refinement of used lubricants and industrial oils to produce re-refined base oil and to remove additives and impurities from used oils and lubricants. A pre-treated used oil may be combined with liquid propane and an extraction vessel and a settling vessel may be used to produce a heavy fraction and a light fraction. The propane may be removed independently from each of these fractions.


U.S. Pat. No. 4,169,044 describes a process for re-refining used lubricating oil. The used lubricating oil is subjected to a solvent extraction in a first extraction zone with a light hydrocarbon solvent to separate a solvent-rich extract oil fraction from a solvent-lean bottoms fraction. Substantially purified lube oil is recovered from the solvent-rich extract oil fraction. The solvent-lean bottoms fraction is subjected to a solvent extraction in a second extraction zone with the light hydrocarbon solvent at a higher solvent-to-oil liquid volume ratio than that of the first solvent extraction to thereby separate a second solvent-rich extract oil fraction from a second solvent-lean bottoms fraction. The substantially purified heavy oil from the second solvent-rich extract oil fraction is recovered. Finally, all remaining solvent from the solids in the second solvent-lean bottoms fraction is removed.


In the field of In situ oil recovery, U.S. Pat. No. 4,476,928 relates to the tertiary recovery of subterranean hydrocarbons using a solvent, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for the generation of a solvent by the recovery of ethers and other light ends from a liquid mixture of organic compounds recovered from the subterranean deposits. Ambient air is bubbled through liquid hydrocarbons in a storage tank to evaporate or boil off light ends which may be used as solvent for injection into the subterranean oil field or coal deposit. The solvent may be used to provide a gas drive or as an extraction solvent for the recovery of crude oil.


U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2009/0242463 relates to a continuous process for upgrading a heavy hydrocarbon. The heavy hydrocarbon is heated and contacted with a solvent to form a first product comprising a mixture of upgraded hydrocarbons and solvent, and a second product comprising asphaltene waste and water. Solvent is recovered from each of the first and second products.


Mixing solvent with viscous oil may be used in the recovery of the oil from subterranean reservoirs, pipelining the oil to refineries, and in upgrading the oil at refineries. Adding solvent to oil can reduce its viscosity and thus facilitate production and pipelining. Adding certain solvents may also cause low value asphaltic components to precipitate and thus facilitate their separation thus generating an upgraded oil which can simplify later refining. There is a need for an improved method for recovering solvent from fluids produced in solvent-dominated recovery processes so as to optimize the entire production-pipelining-refining chain.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

It is an object of the present invention to obviate or mitigate at least one disadvantage of previous processes.


In solvent dominated recovery processes (SDRP)s for recovering in situ oil, including bitumen, the produced fluid stream includes oil and solvent. The solvent is preferably recovered and re-injected into the reservoir. In previously described methods, solvent is removed from the oil/solvent mixture. In methods of embodiments of the present invention, the oil/solvent mixture is first separated into a heavier stream and a lighter stream from which solvent is independently removed.


In a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of producing hydrocarbons from an underground reservoir, the method comprising: (a) injecting a viscosity-reducing solvent into the reservoir; (b) producing a fluid stream from the reservoir comprising one or two liquid hydrocarbon phases; (c) optionally combining the fluid stream with additional solvent such that the number of liquid hydrocarbon phases is increased from one to two; (d) at least partially separating the two liquid hydrocarbon phases into a lighter stream and a heavier stream; (e) at least partially recovering injected solvent from each of the two separated streams to form a lighter solvent-stripped liquid stream and a heavier solvent-stripped liquid stream; and (f) re-injecting at least a portion of the solvent recovered from one or both of the lighter and heavier streams, into the reservoir.


In certain embodiments, the following features may be present.


The fluid stream of step (b) may comprise two liquid hydrocarbon phases.


The viscosity-reducing solvent may be injected as part of a fluid, the fluid comprising greater than 50 mass % of the viscosity-reducing solvent. Immediately after halting injection of the viscosity-reducing solvent into the reservoir, at least 25 mass % of the injected solvent may be in a liquid state in the reservoir. The injected fluid may comprise greater than 75 mass % of the viscosity-reducing solvent.


At least 25 mass %, or at least 50 mass %, of the solvent may enter the reservoir as a liquid.


The solvent may comprise greater than 50 mass % of a C2-C5 paraffinic hydrocarbon solvent. The solvent may comprise greater than 50 mass % propane. The solvent comprises greater than 70 mass % propane. The solvent may comprise greater than 20 mass % ethane. The solvent may comprises CO2.


The phases may be at least partially separated by gravity settling.


The phases may be at least partially separated by applying centrifugal forces.


The solvent may be separated from a stream by lowering a pressure on the stream.


The solvent separation may be effected in a continuous manner, with the feed injected in a separation vessel and the lighter and heavier streams removed from a top and bottom of the separation vessel, respectively.


The heavier solvent-stripped stream may have a MicroCarbon Residue of more than double the MicroCarbon Residue of the lighter solvent-stripped stream.


The heavier solvent-stripped stream may have a density at least 5% greater than a density of the lighter solvent-stripped stream at 25° C. and atmospheric pressure.


The lighter solvent-stripped stream may have a viscosity at 25° C. of at least an order of magnitude less than the heavier solvent-stripped stream.


The method may further comprise pipelining, without adding diluent, the lighter solvent-stripped stream.


The method may further comprise adding diluent to the heavier solvent-stripped stream and then pipelining the resultant stream.


The method may further comprise transporting the lighter and heavier solvent-stripped streams to different locations.


The method may further comprise transporting the lighter and heavier solvent-stripped streams in block operation in a single pipeline.


The method may further comprise using the heavier solvent-stripped stream in the vicinity of the solvent separation, without pipelining. This method may further comprise combusting the heavier solvent-stripped stream to provide power and heat for local oil production or upgrading operations. This method may further comprise combusting the heavier solvent-stripped stream to provide heat for a thermal viscous oil recovery process.


The method may further comprise sending the heavier solvent-stripped stream to an upgrader.


The method may further comprise sending the lighter solvent-stripped stream to a coker.


The method may further comprise using the heavier solvent-stripped stream in asphalt.


The hydrocarbons may be a viscous oil having an in situ viscosity of at least 10 cP (centipoise) at initial reservoir conditions.


The method of producing hydrocarbons may be a cyclic solvent-dominated recovery process. The cyclic solvent-dominated oil recovery process may comprise: (a) injecting the fluid comprising greater than 50 mass % of the viscosity-reducing solvent into an injection well completed in the reservoir; (b) halting injection into the injection well and subsequently producing at least a fraction of the injected fluid and the hydrocarbons from the reservoir through a production well; (c) halting production through the production well; and (d) subsequently repeating the cycle of steps (a) to (c). The injection well and the production well may utilize a common wellbore.


The method may further comprise evaluating a quality of the fluid stream from the reservoir, where, if the quality is above a first quality threshold, at least partially separating solvent therefrom with the lighter stream, without separating it into lighter and heavier streams; where, if the quality is below a second quality threshold, at least partially separating solvent therefrom with the heavier stream, without separating it into lighter and heavier streams; and


where, if the quality is between the first and second quality thresholds, proceeding with the step of at least partially separating the two liquid phases into a lighter stream and a heavier stream prior to solvent separation.


Step (f) may comprise re-injecting at least a portion of the solvent recovered from the lighter stream, and at least a portion of the solvent recovered from the heavier stream, into the reservoir.


Other aspects and features of the present invention will become apparent to those ordinarily skilled in the art upon review of the following description of specific embodiments of the invention in conjunction with the accompanying figures.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

Embodiments of the present invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the attached Figures, wherein:



FIG. 1 is a conceptual diagram showing the phases of a solvent-bitumen mixture depending on the pressure and solvent mole fraction;



FIG. 2 is a flow chart illustrating steps of a method according to a disclosed embodiment; and



FIG. 3 is a schematic of a method according to a disclosed embodiment.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The term “viscous oil”, as used herein, means a hydrocarbon, or mixture of hydrocarbons, that occurs naturally and that has a viscosity of at least 10 cP (centipoise) at initial reservoir conditions. Viscous oil includes oils generally defined as “heavy oil” or “bitumen”. Bitumen is classified as an extra heavy oil, with an API gravity of about 10° or less, referring to its gravity as measured in degrees on the American Petroleum Institute (API) Scale. Heavy oil has an API gravity in the range of about 22.3° to about 10°. The terms viscous oil, heavy oil, and bitumen are used interchangeably herein since they may be extracted using similar processes.


In situ is a Latin phrase for “in the place” and, in the context of hydrocarbon recovery, refers generally to a subsurface hydrocarbon-bearing reservoir. For example, In situ temperature means the temperature within the reservoir. In another usage, an In situ oil recovery technique is one that recovers oil from a reservoir within the earth.


The term “formation” as used herein refers to a subterranean body of rock that is distinct and continuous. The terms “reservoir” and “formation” may be used interchangeably.


During a CSDRP, a reservoir accommodates the injected solvent and non-solvent fluid by compressing the pore fluids and, more importantly in some embodiments, by dilating the reservoir pore space when sufficient injection pressure is applied. Pore dilation is a particularly effective mechanism for permitting solvent to enter into reservoirs filled with viscous oils when the reservoir comprises largely unconsolidated sand grains. Injected solvent fingers into the oil sands and mixes with the viscous oil to yield a reduced viscosity mixture with significantly higher mobility than the native viscous oil. Without intending to be bound by theory, the primary mixing mechanism is thought to be dispersive mixing, not diffusion. Preferably, injected fluid in each cycle replaces the volume of previously recovered fluid and then adds sufficient additional fluid to contact previously uncontacted viscous oil. Preferably, the injected fluid comprises greater than 50% by mass of solvent.


On production, the pressure is reduced and the solvent(s), non-solvent injectant, and viscous oil flow back to the same well and are produced to the surface. As the pressure in the reservoir falls, the produced fluid rate declines with time. Production of the solvent/viscous oil mixture and other injectants may be governed by any of the following mechanisms: gas drive via solvent vaporization and native gas exsolution, compaction drive as the reservoir dilation relaxes, fluid expansion, and gravity-driven flow. The relative importance of the mechanisms depends on static properties such as solvent properties, native GOR (Gas to Oil Ratio), fluid and rock compressibility characteristics, and reservoir depth, but also depends on operational practices such as solvent injection volume, producing pressure, and viscous oil recovery to-date, among other factors.


During an injection/production cycle, the volume of produced oil should be above a minimum threshold to economically justify continuing operations. In addition to an acceptably high production rate, the oil should also be recovered in an efficient manner. One measure of the efficiency of a CSDRP is the ratio of produced oil volume to injected solvent volume over a time interval, called the OISR (produced Oil to Injected Solvent Ratio). Typically, the time interval is one complete injection/production cycle. Alternatively, the time interval may be from the beginning of first injection to the present or some other time interval. When the ratio falls below a certain threshold, further solvent injection may become uneconomic, indicating the solvent should be injected into a different well operating at a higher OISR. The exact OISR threshold depends on the relative price of viscous oil and solvent, among other factors. If either the oil production rate or the OISR becomes too low, the CSDRP may be discontinued. Even if oil rates are high and the solvent use is efficient, it is also important to recover as much of the injected solvent as possible if it has economic value. The remaining solvent may be recovered by producing to a low pressure to vaporize the solvent in the reservoir to aid its recovery. One measure of solvent recovery is the percentage of solvent recovered divided by the total injected. In addition, rather than abandoning the well, another recovery process may be initiated. To maximize the economic return of a producing oil well, it is desirable to maintain an economic oil production rate and OISR as long as possible and then recover as much of the solvent as possible.


The OISR is one measure of solvent efficiency. Those skilled in the art will recognize that there are a multitude of other measures of solvent efficiency, such as the inverse of the OISR, or measures of solvent efficiency on a temporal basis that is different from the temporal basis discussed in this disclosure. Solvent recovery percentage is just one measure of solvent recovery. Those skilled in the art will recognize that there are many other measures of solvent recovery, such as the percentage loss, volume of unrecovered solvent per volume of recovered oil, or its inverse, the volume of produced oil to volume of lost solvent ratio (OLSR).


Solvent Composition


The solvent may be a light, but condensable, hydrocarbon or mixture of hydrocarbons comprising ethane, propane, or butane. Additional injectants may include CO2, natural gas, C3+ hydrocarbons, ketones, and alcohols. Non-solvent co-injectants may include steam, hot water, or hydrate inhibitors. Viscosifiers may be useful in adjusting solvent viscosity to reach desired injection pressures at available pump rates and may include diesel, viscous oil, bitumen, or diluent. Viscosifiers may also act as solvents and therefore may provide flow assurance near the wellbore and in the surface facilities in the event of asphaltene precipitation or solvent vaporization during shut-in periods. Carbon dioxide or hydrocarbon mixtures comprising carbon dioxide may also be desirable to use as a solvent.


In one embodiment, the solvent comprises greater than 50% C2-C5 hydrocarbons on a mass basis. In one embodiment, the solvent is primarily propane, optionally with diluent when it is desirable to adjust the properties of the injectant to improve performance. Alternatively, wells may be subjected to compositions other than these main solvents to improve well pattern performance, for example CO2 flooding of a mature operation.


Phase of Injected Solvent


In one embodiment, the solvent is injected into the well at a pressure in the underground reservoir above a liquid/vapor phase change pressure such that at least 25 mass % of the solvent enters the reservoir in the liquid phase. Alternatively, at least 50, 70, or even 90 mass % of the solvent may enter the reservoir in the liquid phase. Injection as a liquid may be preferred for achieving high pressures because pore dilation at high pressures is thought to be a particularly effective mechanism for permitting solvent to enter into reservoirs filled with viscous oils when the reservoir comprises largely unconsolidated sand grains. Injection as a liquid also may allow higher overall injection rates than injection as a gas.


In an alternative embodiment, the solvent volume is injected into the well at rates and pressures such that immediately after halting injection into the injection well, at least 25 mass % of the injected solvent is in a liquid state in the underground reservoir. Injection as a vapor may be preferred in order to enable more uniform solvent distribution along a horizontal well. Depending on the pressure of the reservoir, it may be desirable to significantly heat the solvent in order to inject it as a vapor. Heating of injected vapor or liquid solvent may enhance production through mechanisms described by “Boberg, T. C. and Lantz, R. B., “Calculation of the production of a thermally stimulated well”, JPT, 1613-1623, December 1966. Towards the end of the injection cycle, a portion of the injected solvent, perhaps 25% or more, may become a liquid as pressure rises. Because no special effort is made to maintain the injection pressure at the saturation conditions of the solvent, liquefaction would occur through pressurization, not condensation. Downhole pressure gauges and/or reservoir simulation may be used to estimate the phase of the solvent and other co-injectants at downhole conditions and in the reservoir. A reservoir simulation is carried out using a reservoir simulator, a software program for mathematically modeling the phase and flow behavior of fluids in an underground reservoir. Those skilled in the art understand how to use a reservoir simulator to determine if 25% of the injectant would be in the liquid phase immediately after halting injection. Those skilled in the art may rely on measurements recorded using a downhole pressure gauge in order to increase the accuracy of a reservoir simulator. Alternatively, the downhole pressure gauge measurements may be used to directly make the determination without the use of reservoir simulation.


Although preferably a CSDRP is predominantly a non-thermal process in that heat is not used principally to reduce the viscosity of the viscous oil, the use of heat is not excluded. Heating may be beneficial to principally improve performance, improve process start-up or provide flow assurance during production. For start-up, low-level heating (for example, less than 100° C.) may be appropriate. Low-level heating of the solvent prior to injection may also be performed to prevent hydrate formation in tubulars and in the reservoir. Heating to higher temperatures may benefit recovery.


In a SDRP for bitumen, or other asphaltic oil, when the solvent primarily comprises aliphatic hydrocarbons, such as ethane, propane, butane, pentane, hexane, or heptane, the composition and pressure of the SDRP-produced fluid may be such that the solvent-bitumen mixture within the produced fluid is in a two-liquid phase state. Other solvents, such as carbon dioxide may also form a two-liquid phase mixture. Toluene, xylene, and cyclohexane are examples of solvents that would not form a two-liquid phase mixture. For example, in an embodiment using propane as the solvent, propane-bitumen mixtures exhibit two liquid phases when produced at some pressures above atmospheric pressure and at propane solvent mole concentrations bounded by about 0.7 and about 0.95. FIG. 1 illustrates a conceptual phase diagram of a propane-bitumen mixture. The vapor only (V), liquid only (L), vapor-liquid (VL), and liquid-liquid (LL) regions of the phase diagram are indicated. Within the liquid-liquid region, there exist two liquid hydrocarbon phases, one relatively richer in propane and the other relatively richer in bitumen. The fluid phase richer in solvent (propane, in this example) is termed the “lighter” phase. The fluid phase richer in bitumen is termed the “heavier” phase. To the extent that the SDRP recovers not only the lighter liquid phase, but all or some fraction of the heavier liquid phases, both of these phases will be expected to be present in the production stream. Depending on the solvent used, more than two phases could be produced. For instance, a heavy, middle, and light phase could be produced, especially if one was more prone to forming an emulsion with water, and each could be processed as discussed below. For ease of reference, the following discussion will refer to two liquid phases, which is to be understood to mean at least two phases. Additionally, an aqueous phase is also produced. Processing of the aqueous phase will not be discussed below. The heavier and lighter phases may comprise small or trace amounts of water.


Embodiments of the present invention relate to a method for separation in order to obtain heavier and lighter streams. FIG. 2 illustrates the steps of one embodiment where the produced fluid comprises two liquid hydrocarbon phases. In an SDRP, a bitumen/solvent mixture is produced from an underground oil reservoir (202). Liquid-liquid phase segregation occurs wherever the solvent mole fraction of the mixture is in the liquid-liquid regime of FIG. 1. The two-liquid phase bitumen/solvent mixture is introduced into a separation vessel capable of maintaining the pressure therein (204). The separation vessel preferably functions using gravity as the primary means of separation, although centrifugation or other means may be employed. The pressure of the solvent is optionally increased (206) to assist in the separation. The particular pressure of the vessel may be selected to control, to some degree, the mole fractions of solvent and bitumen in the separated streams. The lighter stream and the heavier stream separate from one another. The separation could be a batch process, but is more preferably a continuous separation with the two-liquid phase mixture added (preferably in the middle of a vertical vessel) and the two separate streams flowing out the top and bottom (208). Then, the solvent is flashed from the two streams independently to obtain two separate product streams (210). Flashing the solvent is preferably carried out by decreasing the pressure but may also be carried out by increasing the temperature. Other means may also include the use of a selective membrane. The lighter and heavier streams may be pipelined, shipped, or used separately (212).


The lighter solvent-stripped stream will have a lower density, lower MCR (MicroCarbon Residue, which is a marker for coke yield in a coker), lower (almost zero) asphaltene content, lower metals content (metals foul catalysts in future downstream processing), lower resid (non-distillable petroleum fraction) content and a lower viscosity, than a full solvent-stripped stream. These changes all have economic value. Furthermore, less solvent would be needed for pipelining. The heavier solvent-stripped stream would therefore have a higher asphaltene content and higher MCR. MCR may be determined using several methods, including standard testing methods defined in ASTM D 4530 and ISO 10370. With the lower value molecules thus concentrated in a stream separate from the higher value molecules, the process allows independent disposal of the low value stream, either on-site or off-site.


If off-site disposal of the heavier solvent-stripped stream is preferred, the two solvent-stripped products could be pipelined separately or in block operation in a single pipeline. At the terminus of the pipeline, the heavier stream may be used for asphalt manufacture, or sent to a coker or other upgrading process. Heavy ends may also be emulsified (or emulsion) and trucked off site as an alternative to pipelining.


Alternatively, the heaviest stream may be used on-site (locally), pipelining to an off-site location only the higher value material. Local methods of disposal for the heaviest stream include reinjection into a reservoir, use as fuel in a boiler for steam generation, and/or use as fuel in a power generation system. On-site disposal may be most applicable to extra heavy crudes such as Athabasca 8° API crudes where it is advantageous to reject about 5 to 10% of the very heaviest ends. Rejection of the heaviest ends reduces unwanted heavy metals and other molecules with little value to downstream refining processes. Rejection of the heaviest ends reduces the need for diluent and may increase overall value by rejecting molecules with negative value. Rejection of the heaviest ends may also be necessary to meet pipeline specifications for crude oil blends. Crude oil containing the heaviest ends may be too heavy to readily flow, and may need to be heated in order to be shipped to the point of disposal. Where thermal heavy oil recovery operations are taking place on-site, one disposal option is co-injection of the heavy ends with steam (WO/009014586 A1).



FIG. 3 shows a schematic of a process according to one embodiment where both solvent-stripped streams are pipelined to an off-site location. In an SDRP, from the reservoir (302), a solvent/bitumen mixture (304) is produced and is introduced into a separation vessel (306) to separate the solvent/bitumen mixture (304) into the lighter stream (308) and the heavier stream (310). Instead of the whole bitumen/solvent stream undergoing solvent flashing, there are two separate vessels for flashing the solvent from the lighter and heavier stream, independently. Thus, solvent is flashed off from the lighter stream (308) in flash vessel (312) and solvent is flashed off the heavier stream (310) in flash vessel (314). Solvent from these vessels (316 and 318) may be recycled (319) to a separation vessel, re-injected into a reservoir, stored, sold, or disposed of by a combination of these means. If the produced fluid (304) contains a single liquid hydrocarbon phase, the solvent recycle line (319) may increase the concentration of solvent such that the fluid enters the two-liquid hydrocarbon phase regime, crossing the boundary between the L and LL regions shown in FIG. 1. In FIG. 3, the solvent-stripped streams (322 and 324) are sent to holding tanks (326 and 328) and then pipelined. This schematic shows the two streams being pipelined in the same pipeline (336) with block operation. A dashed line (329) indicates an alternative process to pipelining, disposal on-site via reinjection or use as fuel. To assist in pipelining, diluent (330) may be added to the heavier stream (324). At the end of the pipeline, the heavier (332) and lighter (334) streams may be used separately.


The exact temperature and pressure ranges used in the process vessels (306, 312, and 314) are selected to be compatible with how the SDRP operates, and depend on the pressure-volume-temperature relationships of the exact solvent system. For example, a system that produces an unheated fluid would operate generally at low pressures, generally not more than a few hundred kPa. The specific pressure should, however, be in the range of where there are two liquid phases. The operating temperature would likely be ambient temperature. Many of the process vessels (306, 312, 314) employed are also common to solvent deasphalting processes carried out in a refinery. It may be advantageous to optimize the operations, including operational pressures and temperatures, of the process vessels with other, similar vessels located at a more distant refinery containing similar vessels.


Laboratory work has confirmed that ethane or propane, when combined with bitumen, form two liquid phases, as illustrated in FIG. 1. Field tests with ethane have also indicated that ethane-bitumen mixtures exhibit a lighter, deasphalted liquid phase and a heavy liquid phase.


The embodiment illustrated in FIG. 3 best suits an SDRP in which the wells' produced fluids are of similar quality, and where wells may comprise a fluid with two liquid phases. However, in cases where a subset of the wells are producing a fluid substantially different in quality from another subset of wells, it may be advantageous to not mix the produced fluid of all of the wells prior to feeding into a liquid-liquid separation vessel (306). Field observations of the quality of the produced oil in SDRPs show that the quality of the produced fluid may vary with time. For example, in a cyclic SDRP, the quality of the oil produced shortly after injection ceases and production begins may be higher than the quality of the oil produced towards the end of the production cycle. A well may produce only a light liquid phase for a time, then both a light and heavy phase for a time, and finally only a single heavy phase. In such a case, the produced fluids may be introduced directly into the process vessels (312, 314) appropriate for their quality. In practice, a densitometer may be installed in the field to measure the density of the produced fluid, and the fluid routed to the appropriate process vessel (306, 312, 314) depending on the density (medium, light, or heavy).


As discussed above, depending on the solvent used, more than two phases could be produced and could be processed as described above. Alternatively, the number of streams could be less than the number of phases. For example, where there are three phases, heavy, middle, and light, the middle phase could be separated with either the heavy or the light phase. As always, the aqueous phase is excluded from this discussion for simplicity of description.


Table 1 outlines the operating ranges for CSDRPs of some embodiments. The present invention is not intended to be limited by such operating ranges.














Parameter
Broader Embodiment
Narrower Embodiment







Injectant volume
Fill-up estimated pattern pore
Inject, beyond a pressure threshold, 2-15%



volume plus 2-15% of
(or 3-8%) of estimated pore



estimated pattern pore volume;
volume.



or inject, beyond a pressure



threshold, for a period of time



(e.g. weeks to months); or



inject, beyond a pressure



threshold, 2-15% of estimated



pore volume.


Injectant
Main solvent (>50 mass %) C2-C5.
Main solvent (>50 mass %) is propane


composition, main
Alternatively, wells may be
(C3).



subjected to compositions other



than main solvents to improve



well pattern performance (i.e.



CO2 flooding of a mature



operation or altering in-situ



stress of reservoir).


Injectant
Additional injectants may
Only diluent, and only when needed to


composition,
include CO2 (up to about 30%),
achieve adequate injection pressure.


additive
C3+, viscosifiers (e.g. diesel,



viscous oil, bitumen, diluent),



ketones, alcohols, sulphur



dioxide, hydrate inhibitors, and



steam.


Injectant phase &
Solvent injected such that at the
Solvent injected as a liquid, and most


Injection pressure
end of injection, greater than
solvent injected just under fracture



25% by mass of the solvent
pressure and above dilation pressure,



exists as a liquid in the
Pfracture > Pinjection > Pdilation >



reservoir, with no constraint as
PvaporP.



to whether most solvent is



injected above or below



dilation pressure or fracture



pressure.


Injectant
Enough heat to prevent
Enough heat to prevent hydrates with


temperature
hydrates and locally enhance
a safety margin,



wellbore inflow consistent with
Thydrate + 5° C. to Thydrate + 50° C.



Boberg-Lantz mode


Injection rate
0.1 to 10 m3/day per meter of
0.2 to 2 m3/day per meter of



completed well length (rate
completed well length (rate expressed



expressed as volumes of liquid
as volumes of liquid solvent at



solvent at reservoir conditions).
reservoir conditions). Rates may also




be designed to allow for limited or




controlled fracture extent, at fracture




pressure or desired solvent




conformance depending on reservoir




properties.


Threshold pressure
Any pressure above initial
A pressure between 90% and 100% of


(pressure at which
reservoir pressure.
fracture pressure.


solvent continues to


be injected for either


a period of time or


in a volume amount)


Well length
As long of a horizontal well as
500 m-1500 m (commercial well).



can practically be drilled; or the



entire pay thickness for vertical



wells.


Well configuration
Horizontal wells parallel to
Horizontal wells parallel to each other,



each other, separated by some
separated by some regular spacing of



regular spacing of 60-600 m;
60-320 m.



Also vertical wells, high angle



slant wells & multi-lateral



wells. Also infill injection



and/or production wells (of any



type above) targeting bypassed



hydrocarbon from surveillance



of pattern performance.


Well orientation
Orientated in any direction.
Horizontal wells orientated




perpendicular to (or with less than 30




degrees of variation) the direction of




maximum horizontal in-situ stress.


Minimum producing
Generally, the range of the
A low pressure below the vapor


pressure (MPP)
MPP should be, on the low
pressure of the main solvent, ensuring



end, a pressure significantly
vaporization, or, in the limited



below the vapor pressure,
vaporization scheme, a high pressure



ensuring vaporization; and, on
above the vapor pressure. At 500 m



the high-end, a high pressure
depth with pure propane, 0.5 MPa



near the native reservoir
(low)-1.5 MPa (high), values that



pressure. For example, perhaps
bound the 800 kPa vapor pressure of



0.1 MPa-5 MPa, depending
propane.



on depth and mode of operation



(all-liquid or limited



vaporization).


Oil rate
Switch to injection when rate
Switch when the instantaneous oil rate



equals 2 to 50% of the max rate
declines below the calendar day oil



obtained during the cycle;
rate (CDOR) (e.g. total oil/total cycle



Alternatively, switch when
length). Likely most economically



absolute rate equals a pre-set
optimal when the oil rate is at about



value. Alternatively, well is
0.8 × CDOR. Alternatively, switch to



unable to sustain hydrocarbon
injection when rate equals 20-40% of



flow (continuous or
the max rate obtained during the cycle.



intermittent) by primary



production against



backpressure of gathering



system or well is “pumped off”



unable to sustain flow from



artificial lift. Alternatively,



well is out of sync with



adjacent well cycles.


Gas rate
Switch to injection when gas
Switch to injection when gas rate



rate exceeds the capacity of the
exceeds the capacity of the pumping



pumping or gas venting system.
or gas venting system. During



Well is unable to sustain
production, an optimal strategy is one



hydrocarbon flow (continuous
that limits gas production and



or intermittent) by primary
maximizes liquid from a horizontal



production against
well.



backpressure of gathering



system with/or without



compression facilities.


Oil to Solvent Ratio
Begin another cycle if the
Begin another cycle if the OISR of the



OISR of the just completed
just completed cycle is above 0.3.



cycle is above 0.15 or



economic threshold.


Abandonment
Atmospheric or a value at
For propane and a depth of 500 m,


pressure (pressure at
which all of the solvent is
about 340 kPa, the likely lowest


which well is
vaporized.
obtainable bottomhole pressure at the


produced after

operating depth and well below the


CSDRP cycles are

value at which all of the propane is


completed)

vaporized.









In Table 1, embodiments may be formed by combining two or more parameters and, for brevity and clarity, each of these combinations will not be individually listed.


In the context of this specification, diluent means a liquid compound that can be used to dilute the solvent and can be used to manipulate the viscosity of any resulting solvent-bitumen mixture. By such manipulation of the viscosity of the solvent-bitumen (and diluent) mixture, the invasion, mobility, and distribution of solvent in the reservoir can be controlled so as to increase viscous oil production.


The diluent is typically a viscous hydrocarbon liquid, especially a C4 to C20 hydrocarbon, or mixture thereof, is commonly locally produced and is typically used to thin bitumen to pipeline specifications. Pentane, hexane, and heptane are commonly components of such diluents. Bitumen itself can be used to modify the viscosity of the injected fluid, often in conjunction with ethane solvent.


In certain embodiments, the diluent may have an average initial boiling point close to the boiling point of pentane (36° C.) or hexane (69° C.) though the average boiling point (defined further below) may change with reuse as the mix changes (some of the solvent originating among the recovered viscous oil fractions). Preferably, more than 50% by weight of the diluent has an average boiling point lower than the boiling point of decane (174° C.). More preferably, more than 75% by weight, especially more than 80% by weight, and particularly more than 90% by weight of the diluent, has an average boiling point between the boiling point of pentane and the boiling point of decane. In further preferred embodiments, the diluent has an average boiling point close to the boiling point of hexane (69° C.) or heptane (98° C.), or even water (100° C.).


In additional embodiments, more than 50% by weight of the diluent (particularly more than 75% or 80% by weight and especially more than 90% by weight) has a boiling point between the boiling points of pentane and decane. In other embodiments, more than 50% by weight of the diluent has a boiling point between the boiling points of hexane (69° C.) and nonane (151° C.), particularly between the boiling points of heptane (98° C.) and octane (126° C.).


By average boiling point of the diluent, we mean the boiling point of the diluent remaining after half (by weight) of a starting amount of diluent has been boiled off as defined by ASTM D 2887 (1997), for example. The average boiling point can be determined by gas chromatographic methods or more tediously by distillation. Boiling points are defined as the boiling points at atmospheric pressure.


In the preceding description, for purposes of explanation, numerous details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the embodiments of the invention. However, it will be apparent to one skilled in the art that these specific details are not required in order to practice the invention.


The above-described embodiments of the invention are intended to be examples only. Alterations, modifications and variations can be effected to the particular embodiments by those of skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention, which is defined solely by the claims appended hereto.

Claims
  • 1. A method of producing hydrocarbons from an underground reservoir, the method comprising: (a) injecting a viscosity-reducing solvent into the reservoir;(b) producing a fluid stream from the reservoir comprising two liquid hydrocarbon phases;(c) at least partially separating the two liquid hydrocarbon phases into a lighter stream and a heavier stream;(d) at least partially recovering the viscosity-reducing solvent from each of the lighter stream and the heavier stream to form a lighter solvent-stripped liquid stream and a heavier solvent-stripped liquid stream; and(e) re-injecting at least a portion of the viscosity-reducing solvent recovered from one or both of the lighter and heavier streams, into the reservoir.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the viscosity-reducing solvent is injected as part of an injected fluid, the injected fluid comprising greater than 50 mass % of the viscosity-reducing solvent.
  • 3. The method of claim 2, wherein immediately after halting injection of the viscosity-reducing solvent into the reservoir, at least 25 mass % of the viscosity-reducing solvent is in a liquid state in the reservoir.
  • 4. The method of claim 2, wherein the injected fluid comprises greater than 75 mass % of the viscosity-reducing solvent.
  • 5. The method of claim 2, wherein the injected fluid further comprises diesel, viscous oil, bitumen, or diluent, to provide flow assurance.
  • 6. The method of claim 2, wherein the injected fluid further comprises CO2, natural gas, C3+ hydrocarbons, ketones, or alcohols.
  • 7. The method of claim 1, wherein at least 25 mass % of the viscosity-reducing solvent enters the reservoir as a liquid.
  • 8. The method of claim 1, wherein at least 50 mass % of the viscosity-reducing solvent enters the reservoir as a liquid.
  • 9. The method of claim 1, wherein the viscosity-reducing solvent comprises greater than 50 mass % of a C2-C5 paraffinic hydrocarbon solvent.
  • 10. The method of claim 1, wherein the viscosity-reducing solvent comprises greater than 50 mass % propane.
  • 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the viscosity-reducing solvent comprises greater than 70 mass % propane.
  • 12. The method of claim 1, wherein the viscosity-reducing solvent comprises greater than 20 mass % ethane.
  • 13. The method of claim 1, wherein the viscosity-reducing solvent comprises CO2.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, wherein the two hydrocarbon phases are at least partially separated by gravity settling.
  • 15. The method of claim 1, wherein the two hydrocarbon phases are at least partially separated by applying centrifugal forces.
  • 16. The method of claim 1, wherein the viscosity-reducing solvent is separated from a stream by flashing.
  • 17. The method of claim 1, wherein the separation is effected in a continuous manner, with the fluid stream injected in a separation vessel and the lighter and heavier streams removed from a top and bottom of the separation vessel, respectively.
  • 18. The method of claim 1, wherein the heavier solvent-stripped liquid stream has a MicroCarbon Residue of more than double the MicroCarbon Residue of the lighter solvent-stripped liquid stream.
  • 19. The method of claim 1, wherein the heavier solvent-stripped liquid stream has a density at least 5% greater than a density of the lighter solvent-stripped liquid stream at 25° C. and atmospheric pressure.
  • 20. The method of claim 1, wherein the lighter solvent-stripped liquid stream has a viscosity at 25° C. of at least an order of magnitude less than the heavier solvent-stripped liquid stream.
  • 21. The method of claim 1, further comprising pipelining, without adding diluent, the lighter solvent-stripped liquid stream.
  • 22. The method of claim 1, further comprising adding diluent to the heavier solvent-stripped liquid stream and then pipelining a resultant stream.
  • 23. The method of claim 1, further comprising transporting the lighter and heavier solvent-stripped liquid streams to different locations.
  • 24. The method of claim 1, further comprising transporting the lighter and heavier solvent-stripped liquid streams in block operation in a single pipeline.
  • 25. The method of claim 1, further comprising combusting the heavier solvent-stripped liquid stream to provide power and heat for local oil production or upgrading operations.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, further comprising combusting the heavier solvent-stripped liquid stream to provide heat for a thermal viscous oil recovery process.
  • 27. The method of claim 1, further comprising sending the heavier solvent-stripped liquid stream to an upgrader.
  • 28. The method of claim 1, further comprising sending the lighter solvent-stripped liquid stream to a coker.
  • 29. The method of claim 1, wherein the hydrocarbons are a viscous oil having an in situ viscosity of at least 10 cP at initial reservoir conditions.
  • 30. The method of claim 1, wherein the method of producing hydrocarbons is a cyclic solvent-dominated recovery process.
  • 31. The method of claim 30, wherein the cyclic solvent-dominated oil recovery process comprises: (a) injecting a fluid comprising greater than 50 mass % of the viscosity-reducing solvent into an injection well completed in the reservoir;(b) halting injection into the injection well and subsequently producing at least a fraction of the injected fluid and the hydrocarbons from the reservoir through a production well;(c) halting production through the production well; and(d) subsequently repeating the cycle of steps (a) to (c).
  • 32. The method of claim 31, wherein the injection well and the production well share a common wellbore.
  • 33. The method of claim 1, wherein step (e) comprises re-injecting at least a portion of the viscosity-reducing solvent recovered from the lighter stream, and at least a portion of the viscosity-reducing solvent recovered from the heavier stream, into the reservoir.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
2693640 Feb 2010 CA national
US Referenced Citations (201)
Number Name Date Kind
849524 Baker Apr 1907 A
2188012 Stanislaw et al. Jan 1940 A
2412765 Buddrus Jul 1941 A
2365591 Ranney Aug 1942 A
2358183 Ostergaard Sep 1944 A
2655465 Martin Oct 1953 A
3074481 Habermann Jan 1963 A
3185634 Craig, Jr. et al. May 1965 A
3274101 West et al. Sep 1966 A
3323588 Rai et al. Jun 1967 A
3342256 Bernard et al. Sep 1967 A
3434544 Satter et al. Mar 1969 A
3608638 Terwilliger Sep 1971 A
3671419 Ireland et al. Jun 1972 A
3704990 Sarem et al. Dec 1972 A
3705625 Whitten et al. Dec 1972 A
3707189 Prats Dec 1972 A
3739852 Woods et al. Jun 1973 A
3782465 Bell et al. Jan 1974 A
3811503 Burnett et al. May 1974 A
3818989 Christopher, Jr. et al. Jun 1974 A
3823777 Allen et al. Jul 1974 A
3878892 Allen et al. Apr 1975 A
3908762 Redford Sep 1975 A
3945435 Barry Mar 1976 A
3946809 Hagedorn Mar 1976 A
3948319 Pritchett Apr 1976 A
3954141 Allen et al. May 1976 A
3956145 Christopher, Jr. et al. May 1976 A
3958636 Perkins May 1976 A
3960214 Howell et al. Jun 1976 A
3986557 Striegler et al. Oct 1976 A
4004636 Brown et al. Jan 1977 A
4007785 Allen et al. Feb 1977 A
4007787 Cottle Feb 1977 A
4008764 Allen Feb 1977 A
4010799 Kern et al. Mar 1977 A
4017383 Beavon Apr 1977 A
4017583 Motojima et al. Apr 1977 A
4020901 Pisio et al. May 1977 A
4026358 Allen May 1977 A
4034812 Widmyer Jul 1977 A
4037658 Anderson Jul 1977 A
4067391 Dewell Jan 1978 A
4085803 Butler Apr 1978 A
4099568 Allen Jul 1978 A
4109720 Allen et al. Aug 1978 A
4125044 Carrigan et al. Nov 1978 A
4125458 Bushnell et al. Nov 1978 A
4169044 Crowley Sep 1979 A
4223728 Pegg Sep 1980 A
4228853 Harvey et al. Oct 1980 A
4228854 Sacuta Oct 1980 A
4260019 Blair, Jr. Apr 1981 A
4280559 Best Jul 1981 A
4344485 Butler Aug 1982 A
4362213 Tabor Dec 1982 A
4412585 Bouck Nov 1983 A
4424866 McGuire Jan 1984 A
4444261 Islip Apr 1984 A
4450909 Sacuta May 1984 A
4456065 Heim et al. Jun 1984 A
4459142 Goddin, Jr. Jul 1984 A
4476928 Green Oct 1984 A
4489782 Perkins Dec 1984 A
4495995 Chen et al. Jan 1985 A
4510997 Fitch et al. Apr 1985 A
4513819 Islip et al. Apr 1985 A
4540050 Huang et al. Sep 1985 A
4617993 Brown Oct 1986 A
4627495 Harris et al. Dec 1986 A
4676889 Hsieh et al. Jun 1987 A
4678036 Hartman et al. Jul 1987 A
4687058 Casad et al. Aug 1987 A
4706752 Holm Nov 1987 A
4819724 Bou-Mikael et al. Apr 1989 A
4856588 Borchardt Aug 1989 A
4921576 Hurd May 1990 A
4969130 Wason et al. Nov 1990 A
5025863 Haines et al. Jun 1991 A
5027898 Naae Jul 1991 A
5052487 Wall Oct 1991 A
5060727 Schramm et al. Oct 1991 A
5095984 Irani Mar 1992 A
5105884 Sydansk Apr 1992 A
5129457 Sydansk Jul 1992 A
5167280 Sanchez et al. Dec 1992 A
5174377 Kumar Dec 1992 A
5236577 Tipman et al. Aug 1993 A
5246071 Chu Sep 1993 A
5350014 McKay Sep 1994 A
5358046 Sydansk et al. Oct 1994 A
5386875 Venditto et al. Feb 1995 A
5400030 Duren et al. Mar 1995 A
5407009 Butler et al. Apr 1995 A
5607016 Butler Mar 1997 A
5674816 Loree Oct 1997 A
5720350 McGuire Feb 1998 A
5725054 Shayegi et al. Mar 1998 A
5771973 Jensen et al. Jun 1998 A
5826656 McGuire et al. Oct 1998 A
5855243 Bragg Jan 1999 A
5876592 Tipman et al. Mar 1999 A
5899274 Frauenfeld et al. May 1999 A
5910467 Bragg Jun 1999 A
5927404 Bragg Jul 1999 A
5968349 Duyvesteyn et al. Oct 1999 A
6007709 Duyvesteyn et al. Dec 1999 A
6039116 Stevenson et al. Mar 2000 A
6068054 Bragg May 2000 A
6074558 Tachibana et al. Jun 2000 A
6174431 Williams et al. Jan 2001 B1
6214175 Heinemann et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214213 Tipman et al. Apr 2001 B1
6244341 Miller Jun 2001 B1
6318464 Mokrys Nov 2001 B1
6357526 Abdel-Halim et al. Mar 2002 B1
6358403 Brown et al. Mar 2002 B1
6358404 Brown et al. Mar 2002 B1
6405799 Vallejos et al. Jun 2002 B1
6484805 Perkins Nov 2002 B1
6591908 Nasr Jul 2003 B2
6662872 Gutek et al. Dec 2003 B2
6708759 Leaute et al. Mar 2004 B2
6712215 Scheybeler Mar 2004 B2
6769486 Lim et al. Aug 2004 B2
6782946 Perkins et al. Aug 2004 B2
6800116 Stevens et al. Oct 2004 B2
6882607 Sano et al. Apr 2005 B2
6883607 Nenniger et al. Apr 2005 B2
7067811 Long et al. Jun 2006 B2
7073837 Madlinger Jul 2006 B2
7096092 Ramakrishnan et al. Aug 2006 B1
7141162 Garner et al. Nov 2006 B2
7165616 Jorgensen Jan 2007 B2
7165621 Ayoub et al. Jan 2007 B2
7234524 Shaw et al. Jun 2007 B2
7248969 Patzek et al. Jul 2007 B2
7259688 Hirsch et al. Aug 2007 B2
7272973 Craig Sep 2007 B2
7289942 Yang et al. Oct 2007 B2
7294156 Chakrabarty et al. Nov 2007 B2
7303018 Cawiezel et al. Dec 2007 B2
7363973 Nenniger et al. Apr 2008 B2
7418307 Katircioglu Aug 2008 B2
7434619 Rossi et al. Oct 2008 B2
7451066 Edwards et al. Nov 2008 B2
7464756 Gates et al. Dec 2008 B2
7465389 Sirota et al. Dec 2008 B2
7478024 Gurpinar et al. Jan 2009 B2
7527096 Chung et al. May 2009 B2
7540951 Selmen et al. Jun 2009 B2
7546228 Cullick et al. Jun 2009 B2
7585407 Duyvesteyn et al. Sep 2009 B2
7711486 Thigpen et al. May 2010 B2
7769486 McHenry et al. Aug 2010 B2
8118096 Ayasse Feb 2012 B2
20020007947 Patel et al. Jan 2002 A1
20030015321 Lim et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030141053 Yuan et al. Jul 2003 A1
20040149431 Wylie et al. Aug 2004 A1
20050150844 Hyndman et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050263437 Howdeshell Dec 2005 A1
20060113218 Hart et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060115221 Chalifoux et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060138036 Garner et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060138055 Garner et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060162922 Chung et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060260980 Yeung Nov 2006 A1
20060289157 Rao Dec 2006 A1
20070106545 Jowers et al. May 2007 A1
20070108098 Flint et al. May 2007 A1
20070111903 Engel et al. May 2007 A1
20070122104 Chalifoux et al. May 2007 A1
20070179766 Cullick et al. Aug 2007 A1
20070187090 Shahbazi Aug 2007 A1
20070199710 Hocking Aug 2007 A1
20080126168 Carney et al. May 2008 A1
20080167511 Prim Jul 2008 A1
20080262736 Thigpen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080262737 Thigpen et al. Oct 2008 A1
20080275796 Katircioglu Nov 2008 A1
20080277113 Stegemeier et al. Nov 2008 A1
20080294484 Furman et al. Nov 2008 A1
20090008290 Biswas et al. Jan 2009 A1
20090145606 Hocking Jun 2009 A1
20090159277 Hocking Jun 2009 A1
20090194282 Beer et al. Aug 2009 A1
20090242463 Chirinos et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100006285 DaSilva et al. Jan 2010 A1
20100032348 Duyvesteyn et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100147516 Betzer-Zilevitch Jun 2010 A1
20100155062 Boone et al. Jun 2010 A1
20100218954 Yale et al. Sep 2010 A1
20100276341 Speirs et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110120717 LaMont et al. May 2011 A1
20110198086 Kwan et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110198091 Sirota et al. Aug 2011 A1
20110224907 Chalifoux Sep 2011 A1
20110226471 Wattenbarger et al. Sep 2011 A1
20110264373 Hehmeyer et al. Oct 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (62)
Number Date Country
940853 Jan 1974 CA
1015656 Aug 1977 CA
1059432 Jul 1979 CA
1122115 Apr 1982 CA
1246993 Dec 1988 CA
2043092 Nov 1992 CA
2058812 Jul 1993 CA
2108723 Oct 1993 CA
2108349 Nov 1993 CA
2075108 Jan 1994 CA
2120851 Aug 1995 CA
2232403 Feb 1998 CA
2185837 Mar 1998 CA
2200899 Sep 1998 CA
2232929 Sep 1998 CA
2270703 Oct 2000 CA
2312621 Dec 2000 CA
2243105 Nov 2001 CA
2141112 Nov 2002 CA
2349234 Nov 2002 CA
2353109 Jan 2003 CA
2310959 Jan 2004 CA
2471048 Mar 2004 CA
2527058 Mar 2004 CA
2505411 Jul 2004 CA
2425840 Oct 2004 CA
2306016 Nov 2004 CA
2349234 Dec 2004 CA
2435113 Jan 2005 CA
2493677 Jun 2005 CA
2455011 Jul 2005 CA
2462359 Sep 2005 CA
2520943 Apr 2006 CA
2490734 Jun 2006 CA
2494391 Jul 2006 CA
2502329 Sep 2006 CA
2538464 Sep 2006 CA
2147079 Oct 2006 CA
2235085 Jan 2007 CA
2281276 Feb 2007 CA
2521248 Mar 2007 CA
2587166 Sep 2007 CA
2552482 Jan 2008 CA
2630682 Jun 2008 CA
2351148 Jul 2008 CA
2304938 Dec 2008 CA
2591354 Dec 2008 CA
2332685 Mar 2010 CA
2688392 Jun 2011 CA
2724806 Jun 2011 CA
1355169 Oct 2003 EP
2022936 Feb 2009 EP
1723314 Mar 1992 RU
WO 9933936 Aug 1999 WO
WO 2006044199 Apr 2006 WO
WO 2008009114 Jan 2008 WO
WO 2008070990 Jun 2008 WO
WO 2009014586 Jan 2009 WO
WO 2009061433 May 2009 WO
WO 2009067423 May 2009 WO
WO 2009075962 Jun 2009 WO
WO 2010039029 Apr 2010 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (22)
Entry
Boberg, T.C., et al. (1966) “Calculation of the production of a thermally stimulated well”, Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 18, No. 12 1613-1623, December.
Feali, M. et al., (2008) “Feasibility Study of the Cyclic VAPEX Process for Low Permeable Carbonate Systems”, International Petroleum Technology Conference Paper 12833; Dec. 3-5, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Lim, G.B. et al., (1995) “Cyclic Stimulation of Cold Lake Oil Sand with Supercritical Ethane”, SPE Paper 30298, SPE International Heavy Oil Symposium; Jun. 19-21, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lim, G.B., et al., (1996) “Three-dimensional Scaled Physical Modeling of Solvent Vapour Extraction of Cold Lake Bitumen”, The Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 35(4), pp. 32-40, Apr. 1996; SPE/CIM/CANMET International Conference on Recent Advances in Horizontal Well Applications, Mar. 20-23, Calgary, Canada.
ASTM D 2887 (1997).
Azin et al. (2007) “Investigation of the Vapex Performance in High Pressure Heavy Oil Reservoirs”.
Black, L. (2003) “VAPEX—A New Propane Market,” Propane Canada May/Jun. 2003, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi—qa5410/is—200305/ai—n21332180/.
Budd, G. (2007) “New Technology Could Substantially Boost SAGD Potential,” Oil Sands Review.
Butler, R. M. et al. (1991) “A New Process (VAPEX) for Recovering Heavy Oils Using Hot Water and Hydrocarbon Vapour,” Jrnl. of Canadian Petroleum Tech., v. 30, pp. 97-106.
Butler, R. M. et al. (1993) “Recovery of Heavy Oils Using Vapourized Hydrocarbon Solvents: Further Development of the Vapex Process,” Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, June, v. 32, No. 6, pp. 56-62.
Cuthiell, D. et al. (2003) “Investigation of the VAPEX Process Using CT Scanning and Numerical Simulation,” Jrnl. of Canadian Petroleum Tech., v. 42.2, pp. 41-49.
Cuthiell, D. et al. (2006) “Viscous Fingering Effects in Solvent Displacement of Heavy Oil,” Jrnl. of Canadian Petroleum Tech., v. 45.7, pp. 29-39.
Gallant, R. J. et al. (1993) “Steaming and Operating Strategies at a Midlife CSS Operation,” SPE 25794, pp. 183-194.
Gupta, S. et al. (2001) “Insights into Some Key Issues with Solvent Aided Process,” Petroleum Society-Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy & Petroleum, Paper No. 2001-126.
Katz et al. (1959) “Handbook of Natural Gas Engineering,” McGraw-Hill, p. 212.
Nasr, T. N. et al. (1991) “A Novel Scaled Physical Simulator for Horizontal Well Enhanced Oil Recovery,” Petroleum Society of CIM and CANMET, Paper No. 5.
Rostami, B. et al. (2005) “Investigation of the Vapex Process in High-Pressure Fractured Heavy-Oil Reservoirs,” SPE 97766, Alberta, Canada.
Sloan, Jr., E. D. (1998) “Clathrate Hydrate of Natural Gases,” 2nd ed. Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, pp. 162, 170, 200-201, 269, 520.
Turta, A. T. et al. (2004) “Overview of Short-Distance Oil Displacement Processes,” Jrnl. of Canadian Petroleum Tech., v. 43, pp. 29-38.
Upreti, S. R. et al. (2007) “Vapor Extraction of Heavy Oil and Bitumen: A Review,” Energy & Fuels, v. 21, pp. 1562-1574.
Vagnetti, R. et al. (2009) “Solvent Based Oil Recovery for In-Situ Upgrading of Heavy Oil,” www.netl.doe.gov/technologies/oil-gas/Petroleum/projects/EP/ImprovedRec/42745SolventEOR.html.
Vogel, J. V. (1996) “How Solvent Vapors Can Improve Steam Floods,” World Oil, Nov. 1996, pp. 75-77.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20110198091 A1 Aug 2011 US