This invention relates to solving linear matrices in integrated circuit devices, and particularly in programmable integrated circuit devices such as programmable logic devices (PLDs).
Certain linear matrix equations may take the form RW=Z, where each of R, W and Z is a matrix and W contains the unknowns. This problem decomposes into a group of linear equations involving multiplication of elements of W by elements of R. To solve for the elements of W thus requires division by the elements of R. However, for some matrices, such as a 4×4 matrix typically found in an LTE application, implementing a divide operation in circuitry may consume as much resources as the remainder of the datapath combined. Moreover, latency through the divider can be greater than the latency through the remainder of the datapath.
The present invention relates to simplified circuitry for solving certain linear matrix problems by turning the aforementioned division into a multiplication. This eliminates the need for resource-consuming, latency increasing division circuitry. Latency may be further reduced by solving a plurality of matrices at once. The circuitry can be provided in a fixed logic device, or can be configured into a programmable integrated circuit device such as a programmable logic device (PLD).
As explained in copending, commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/072,144, filed Feb. 25, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, certain linear matrix equations may be solved using Cholesky decomposition to factor a matrix, followed by a forward or back substitution. The result of the Cholesky decomposition may be a “triangulated” matrix—i.e., a matrix with no values above the diagonal.
As just one example, The following sequence of equations show an example of forward substitution with a lower triangular matrix R.
Because R is a lower triangular matrix, the first row results in one equation in one unknown, which is on the diagonal. Solving each row reduces the subsequent row to one equation in one unknown, each unknown being on the diagonal. Therefore, each solution requires division by a term on the diagonal.
In Cholesky decomposition, to factor a matrix a, the first element ljj, at the top of each column in the resultant triangulated matrix l, may be calculated as:
ljj=√{square root over (ajj−Lj,Lj
)}
where ajj is the jjth element of the original matrix a, and Lj is vector representing the jth row of matrix l up to the (j−1)th column. The subsequent elements in the jth column may be calculated as:
where aij is the ijth element of the original matrix a, and Li is vector representing the portion of the ith row of matrix 1 up to the (j−1)th column.
As disclosed in copending, commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/557,846, filed Sep. 11, 2009 and hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety, if the first of the two equations above is substituted into the second equation, the result is the following:
When any lij term is calculated this way, the latency in calculating the ljj term in the denominator has little or no effect on the lij term calculation, if the quantity that whose square root is being taken for the ljj term is identical in structure to the numerator (although having different values). The denominator term (before the square root is taken) and all of the following numerator terms can be burst into the same datapath, while the denominator term is latched and used as the input to a second datapath. The second datapath multiplies the datapath output by the inverse square root of the latched value. And if the calculations are properly pipelined, once the pipeline is filled, a new term can be output on each clock cycle.
The diagonal of the resulting lower triangular matrix has all real terms ljj, even if the remaining terms are complex. Therefore, there is unused memory allocated to each term of the diagonal, intended to store a nonexistent imaginary part. This unused memory can be used to store the inverse of each term of the diagonal, turning the required division described above for solution of each unknown into a multiplication, which is consumes fewer resources than a division. Moreover, each term of the diagonal is in the form ljj=x/(x0.5) which is equal to x0.5, meaning that 1/ljj is equal to x−0.5, which is already computed in the calculation of ljj. Therefore, no additional resources are used in either the calculation or storage of the 1/ljj terms.
Therefore, in accordance with the present invention, there is provided circuitry for solving linear matrix equations involving a resultant matrix, an unknown matrix and a product matrix that is a product of said resultant matrix and said unknown matrix. The circuitry includes matrix decomposition circuitry for triangulating an input matrix to create a resultant matrix having a plurality of resultant matrix elements on a diagonal, and having a further plurality of resultant matrix elements arranged in columns below the resultant matrix elements on the diagonal. The matrix decomposition circuitry includes an inverse square root multiplication path that computes diagonal elements of the resultant matrix. The circuitry for solving linear matrix equations further includes first, second and third matrix memories for respectively storing the resultant matrix, the unknown matrix and the product matrix. The inverse square root multiplication path includes an inverse square root module, and the said inverse square root module computes inverses of the diagonal elements. When solution of a linear matrix equation involves division by a diagonal element, multiplication by the inverse of that diagonal element may be used instead.
A method of configuring a programmable integrated circuit device as such circuitry, and a programmable integrated circuit device so programmed, are also provided. In addition, a machine-readable data storage medium encoded with machine-executable instructions for so configuring a programmable integrated circuit device is provided.
Finally, a method of operating the circuitry to hide latency is provided, in which a respective plurality of at least one of the resultant matrix and the product matrix is stored in a respective one of the first and third matrix memories. Each row of each matrix in the first and third matrix memories has a row index, with row indices repeating from one matrix in each respective plurality of matrices to another matrix in that respective plurality of matrices. For each row index, all rows in each matrix in at least one of the respective plurality of matrices having that row index are processed prior to processing any rows of any matrix in that at least one of the respective plurality of matrices having any other row index.
Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
Taking an example of lower triangular matrix l of dimensions 6×6, the elements on the diagonal are l11, . . . , l66. In each jth column, the elements under ljj are lij, i=j+1, . . . , imax (in this case, imax=6). The matrix may be considered to be empty above the diagonal, or the elements above the diagonal may be considered to be zeroes.
Each element lij can be calculated using two datapaths. The first datapath calculates the following result:
lx=ax−Lx,Lx
where for l and a, x=ij; for the L vectors, x=i or j, respectively; and Lx,Lx
denotes the inner product of the L vectors.
The first output (x=jj) of the first datapath is latched at the input of a second datapath, which calculates the actual lij. The first element of the column (ljj) is calculated as the inverse square root of the input (ajj−Lj,Lj
), multiplied by the input, generating the square root of the input. The inverse square root is used instead of a direct square root calculation, because it can be reused for the following elements in the column using multiplication, which is easier to implement than division.
To calculate all of the subsequent values in the column, the latched first datapath output is used for the inverse square root input which is a first multiplier input, and the other multiplier input is, for each subsequent term, the corresponding output of the first datapath. The entire column can therefore be calculated without waiting for any individual element to be finished.
For example, programmable logic devices available from Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif., may have a smaller number of larger memory blocks (e.g., 144 kb memory blocks), one of which could be used as memory 201 to store matrix a, and a larger number of smaller memory blocks (e.g., 9 kb memory blocks), imax of which could be used as memories 202 to separately store the columns of matrix l. Of course, it is not necessary to use different sizes of memories for memories 201, 202; if a sufficient number of larger memories is available, any one or more of the memories used as column memories 202 to separately store the columns of matrix l may be the same size as (or even larger than) the memory used as memory 201 to store matrix a.
Thus, in a single clock cycle, address input 211 may be applied to memory 201 to read out matrix element aij at 221 for input to calculation datapath 300, while address input 212 may be applied to the appropriate j−1 memories 202 on path 203 to read out vector Li, and address input 222 may be applied to the appropriate j−1 memories 202 on path 213 to read out vector Lj. The outputs 221, 203, 213 maybe input to calculation datapath 300, described in more detail in connection with
Datapath 300, which may be implemented in fixed or programmable logic, includes inner product datapath 301 and inverse square root datapath 302.
Inner product datapath 301 includes inner product generator 311 and subtractor 321 to subtract the inner product from aij. Inner product generator 311 may include a sufficient plurality of multipliers and adders to simultaneously multiply imax pairs of values, and then add those products together.
For complex vectors, inner product generator 311 may include sufficient multipliers and adders to simultaneously multiply 2(imax) pairs of values, and also may include the necessary components to compute the complex conjugate values for Lj in the case where the values are complex. The Lj term is latched in register 331 at the beginning of a column process and is not changed until the next column is started.
Starting with the second column, the first output of inner product datapath 301 for each column—i.e., each ljj—is latched into register 312 as the input to inverse square root datapath 302 for the duration of calculation of that column. Inverse square root datapath 302 includes inverse square root module 322 for calculating the inverse square root of ljj, and multiplier 332 for multiplying the inverse square root by the current lij. The latching of ljj into register 312 delays its input to multiplier 332 by one clock cycle. Therefore, the input of lij to multiplier 332 also is delayed, by register 342, so that latency is the same for both inputs.
For the first column, terms are generated using simple division. The top term, l11 is a11—0.5 and all the subsequent inputs for the first column are also divided by a11—i.e., li1=ai1/a11−0.5. This is accomplished using multiplexer 350 to allow the aij inputs 351 to bypass inner product datapath 301.
In addition to increasing the number of multipliers and adders in inner product generator 311, as discussed above, some other relatively minor additions (not shown) would be made to datapath 300 where the inputs are complex. In such a case, the Li, Lj vector values will be complex. This will require generating the complex conjugate of the vector value latched in register 331. That can be done by providing logic to invert the sign bit of the imaginary portion of each value. The changes required in inverse square root datapath 302 are simplified by the nature of matrix l.
As discussed above, the diagonal value—i.e., the first value at the top of each column in the Cholesky decomposition—is always real, meaning that inverse square root calculation 322 will always be real. Therefore, while the other multiplicand at multiplier 332 is complex, the multiplication will be one of a complex value by a real scalar value, so only two multipliers—i.e., one additional multiplier—are required. Moreover, a memory location for the imaginary part of each diagonal value ljj will be unused, and available for storing 1/ljj. That value can be extracted from inverse square root calculation 322 at 323 whenever i=j, and can be multiplexed together at 333 with the output of multiplier 332 for storage in place of the imaginary part of ljj.
As discussed above, for any given row of the RW=Z matrix calculation example given above, the w element calculation can be described as:
This can be rewritten as follows:
turning the division into a multiplication.
A row of the R matrix may be loaded by loading similarly indexed elements from each of the R column memories 401, along with the entire W vector from memory 402, and a single element with the same row index from the Z memory 403. The number of elements from both the R row and the W matrix that are read into the vector core 404 is row_index−1 (the remaining elements may be zeroed).
Multipliers 414, summer 424 and subtractor 434 of core 404 compute the equation set forth above for each element of W, as multiplexer 405 selects the appropriate inverted diagonal value from the row_indexedth element of the Rth row.
AND gates 444 can be used to zero columns that are not used in the current row. For example if there are four rows in each triangulated matrix, the first row will have one element, the second row will have two elements, and so on. If for Row 1, one zeroes out columns 2,3,4, for Row 2 one zeroes out columns 3,4 and so on, then it is not necessary to initialize the upper half of R memory 401 with zeroes, but only the lower half with the values of the triangulated matrix R.
Preferably, the first row index for each of the R matrices in R memory is processed first, then the second row index, then the third, and so on. If the number of R matrices processed at any given time is greater than the datapath and memory latency, which may be about typically about 14 clock cycles for a multiplier-based calculation shown in
The W vectors can be unloaded from W memory. Alternatively, the W values can be written to a W output memory (not shown), which can be loaded sequentially from output 406, which would save the requirement for a multiplexer on the output of the W memories when unloading.
The various operators used for the calculations described above can be configured in a programmable device using, e.g., the techniques described in copending, commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/625,655, filed Jan. 22, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
One potential use for the present invention may be in programmable integrated circuit devices such as programmable logic devices, where programming software can be provided to allow users to configure a programmable device to perform matrix operations. The result would be that fewer logic resources of the programmable device would be consumed. And where the programmable device is provided with a certain number of dedicated blocks for arithmetic functions (to spare the user from having to configure arithmetic functions from general-purpose logic), the number of dedicated blocks needed to be provided (which may be provided at the expense of additional general-purpose logic) can be reduced (or sufficient dedicated blocks for more operations, without further reducing the amount of general-purpose logic, can be provided).
Instructions for carrying out a method according to this invention for programming a programmable device to perform matrix decomposition may be encoded on a machine-readable medium, to be executed by a suitable computer or similar device to implement the method of the invention for programming or configuring PLDs or other programmable devices to perform addition and subtraction operations as described above. For example, a personal computer may be equipped with an interface to which a PLD can be connected, and the personal computer can be used by a user to program the PLD using a suitable software tool, such as the QUARTUS® II software available from Altera Corporation, of San Jose, Calif.
The magnetic domains of coating 802 of medium 800 are polarized or oriented so as to encode, in manner which may be conventional, a machine-executable program, for execution by a programming system such as a personal computer or other computer or similar system, having a socket or peripheral attachment into which the PLD to be programmed may be inserted, to configure appropriate portions of the PLD, including its specialized processing blocks, if any, in accordance with the invention.
In the case of a CD-based or DVD-based medium, as is well known, coating 812 is reflective and is impressed with a plurality of pits 813, arranged on one or more layers, to encode the machine-executable program. The arrangement of pits is read by reflecting laser light off the surface of coating 812. A protective coating 814, which preferably is substantially transparent, is provided on top of coating 812.
In the case of magneto-optical disk, as is well known, coating 812 has no pits 813, but has a plurality of magnetic domains whose polarity or orientation can be changed magnetically when heated above a certain temperature, as by a laser (not shown). The orientation of the domains can be read by measuring the polarization of laser light reflected from coating 812. The arrangement of the domains encodes the program as described above.
A PLD 90 programmed according to the present invention may be used in many kinds of electronic devices. One possible use is in a data processing system 900 shown in
System 900 can be used in a wide variety of applications, such as computer networking, data networking, instrumentation, video processing, digital signal processing, or any other application where the advantage of using programmable or reprogrammable logic is desirable. PLD 90 can be used to perform a variety of different logic functions. For example, PLD 90 can be configured as a processor or controller that works in cooperation with processor 901. PLD 90 may also be used as an arbiter for arbitrating access to a shared resources in system 900. In yet another example, PLD 90 can be configured as an interface between processor 901 and one of the other components in system 900. It should be noted that system 900 is only exemplary, and that the true scope and spirit of the invention should be indicated by the following claims.
Various technologies can be used to implement PLDs 90 as described above and incorporating this invention.
It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention. For example, the various elements of this invention can be provided on a PLD in any desired number and/or arrangement. One skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the described embodiments, which are presented for purposes of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3473160 | Wahlstrom | Oct 1969 | A |
4156927 | McElroy et al. | May 1979 | A |
4179746 | Tubbs | Dec 1979 | A |
4212076 | Conners | Jul 1980 | A |
4215406 | Gomola et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4215407 | Gomola et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4422155 | Amir et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4484259 | Palmer et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4521907 | Amir et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4575812 | Kloker et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
4597053 | Chamberlin | Jun 1986 | A |
4616330 | Betz | Oct 1986 | A |
4623961 | Mackiewicz | Nov 1986 | A |
4682302 | Williams | Jul 1987 | A |
4718057 | Venkitakrishnan et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
4727508 | Williams | Feb 1988 | A |
4736335 | Barkan | Apr 1988 | A |
4777614 | Ward | Oct 1988 | A |
4791590 | Ku et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4799004 | Mori | Jan 1989 | A |
4823295 | Mader | Apr 1989 | A |
4839847 | Laprade | Jun 1989 | A |
4871930 | Wong et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4912345 | Steele et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4918637 | Morton | Apr 1990 | A |
4967160 | Quievy et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4982354 | Takeuchi et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4991010 | Hailey et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994997 | Martin et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5073863 | Zhang | Dec 1991 | A |
5081604 | Tanaka | Jan 1992 | A |
5122685 | Chan et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5128559 | Steele | Jul 1992 | A |
5175702 | Beraud et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5208491 | Ebeling et al. | May 1993 | A |
RE34363 | Freeman | Aug 1993 | E |
5267187 | Hsieh et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5296759 | Sutherland et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5338983 | Agarwala | Aug 1994 | A |
5339263 | White | Aug 1994 | A |
5349250 | New | Sep 1994 | A |
5357152 | Jennings, III et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5371422 | Patel et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5375079 | Uramoto et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381357 | Wedgwood et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5404324 | Colon-Benet | Apr 1995 | A |
5424589 | Dobbelaere et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5446651 | Moyse et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5451948 | Jekel | Sep 1995 | A |
5452231 | Butts et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5452375 | Rousseau et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5457644 | McCollum | Oct 1995 | A |
5465226 | Goto | Nov 1995 | A |
5465375 | Thepaut et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5483178 | Costello et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5497498 | Taylor | Mar 1996 | A |
5500812 | Saishi et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5500828 | Doddington et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5523963 | Hsieh et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5528550 | Pawate et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537601 | Kimura et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5541864 | Van Bavel et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5546018 | New et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550993 | Ehlig et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559450 | Ngai et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5563526 | Hastings et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5563819 | Nelson | Oct 1996 | A |
5570039 | Oswald et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5570040 | Lytle et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5572148 | Lytle et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581501 | Sansbury et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5590350 | Guttag et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594366 | Khong et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594912 | Brueckmann et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596763 | Guttag et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5606266 | Pedersen | Feb 1997 | A |
5617058 | Adrian et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5631848 | Laczko et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633601 | Nagaraj | May 1997 | A |
5636150 | Okamoto | Jun 1997 | A |
5636368 | Harrison et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640578 | Balmer et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644519 | Yatim | Jul 1997 | A |
5644522 | Moyse et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646545 | Trimberger et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5646875 | Taborn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5648732 | Duncan | Jul 1997 | A |
5652903 | Weng et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5655069 | Ogawara et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5664192 | Lloyd et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5689195 | Cliff et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5696708 | Leung | Dec 1997 | A |
5729495 | Madurawe | Mar 1998 | A |
5740404 | Baji | Apr 1998 | A |
5744980 | McGowan et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5744991 | Jefferson et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5754459 | Telikepalli | May 1998 | A |
5761483 | Trimberger | Jun 1998 | A |
5764555 | McPherson et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768613 | Asghar | Jun 1998 | A |
5771186 | Kodali et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5777912 | Leung et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784636 | Rupp | Jul 1998 | A |
5790446 | Yu et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5794067 | Kadowaki | Aug 1998 | A |
5801546 | Pierce et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805477 | Perner | Sep 1998 | A |
5805913 | Guttag et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808926 | Gorshtein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812479 | Cliff et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812562 | Baeg | Sep 1998 | A |
5815422 | Dockser | Sep 1998 | A |
5821776 | McGowan | Oct 1998 | A |
5825202 | Tavana et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5838165 | Chatter | Nov 1998 | A |
5841684 | Dockser | Nov 1998 | A |
5847579 | Trimberger | Dec 1998 | A |
5847978 | Ogura et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847981 | Kelley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859878 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5869979 | Bocchino | Feb 1999 | A |
5872380 | Rostoker et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874834 | New | Feb 1999 | A |
5878250 | LeBlanc | Mar 1999 | A |
5880981 | Kojima et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5892962 | Cloutier | Apr 1999 | A |
5894228 | Reddy et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5898602 | Rothman et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5931898 | Khoury | Aug 1999 | A |
5942914 | Reddy et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944774 | Dent | Aug 1999 | A |
5949710 | Pass et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951673 | Miyata | Sep 1999 | A |
5956265 | Lewis | Sep 1999 | A |
5959871 | Pierzchala et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960193 | Guttag et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5961635 | Guttag et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963048 | Harrison et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5963050 | Young et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5968196 | Ramamurthy et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970254 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978260 | Trimberger et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982195 | Cliff et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986465 | Mendel | Nov 1999 | A |
5991788 | Mintzer | Nov 1999 | A |
5991898 | Rajski et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995748 | Guttag et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999015 | Cliff et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
5999990 | Sharrit et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005806 | Madurawe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006321 | Abbott | Dec 1999 | A |
6009451 | Burns | Dec 1999 | A |
6018755 | Gonikberg et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6020759 | Heile | Feb 2000 | A |
6021423 | Nag et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029187 | Verbauwhede | Feb 2000 | A |
6031763 | Sansbury | Feb 2000 | A |
6041339 | Yu et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6041340 | Mintzer | Mar 2000 | A |
6052327 | Reddy et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052755 | Terrill et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055555 | Boswell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6064614 | Khoury | May 2000 | A |
6065131 | Andrews et al. | May 2000 | A |
6066960 | Pedersen | May 2000 | A |
6069487 | Lane et al. | May 2000 | A |
6072994 | Phillips et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6073154 | Dick | Jun 2000 | A |
6075381 | LaBerge | Jun 2000 | A |
6084429 | Trimberger | Jul 2000 | A |
6085317 | Smith | Jul 2000 | A |
6091261 | DeLange | Jul 2000 | A |
6091765 | Pietzold, III et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094726 | Gonion et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6097988 | Tobias | Aug 2000 | A |
6098163 | Guttag et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107820 | Jefferson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107821 | Kelem et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6107824 | Reddy et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6130554 | Kolze et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6140839 | Kaviani et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144980 | Oberman | Nov 2000 | A |
6154049 | New | Nov 2000 | A |
6157210 | Zaveri et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163788 | Chen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167415 | Fischer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6175849 | Smith | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6215326 | Jefferson et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226735 | Mirsky | May 2001 | B1 |
6242947 | Trimberger | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6243729 | Staszewski | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6246258 | Lesea | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6260053 | Maulik et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279021 | Takano et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286024 | Yano et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6314442 | Suzuki | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6314551 | Borland | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6321246 | Page et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6323680 | Pedersen et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6327605 | Arakawa et al. | Dec 2001 | B2 |
6351142 | Abbott | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6353843 | Chehrazi et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359468 | Park et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360240 | Takano et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6362650 | New et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366944 | Hossain et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367003 | Davis | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6369610 | Cheung et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6377970 | Abdallah et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6407576 | Ngai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6407694 | Cox et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6427157 | Webb | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434587 | Liao et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438569 | Abbott | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438570 | Miller | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6446107 | Knowles | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453382 | Heile | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6467017 | Ngai et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6480980 | Koe | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6483343 | Faith et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487575 | Oberman | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6523055 | Yu et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6523057 | Savo et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6531888 | Abbott | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6538470 | Langhammer et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542000 | Black et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6556044 | Langhammer et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6557092 | Callen | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6571268 | Giacalone et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6573749 | New et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6574762 | Karimi et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6591283 | Conway et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6591357 | Mirsky | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6600495 | Boland et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6600788 | Dick et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6628140 | Langhammer et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6687722 | Larsson et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6692534 | Wang et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6700581 | Baldwin et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725441 | Keller et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6728901 | Rajski et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6731133 | Feng et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6732134 | Rosenberg et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744278 | Liu et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6745254 | Boggs et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763367 | Kwon et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6771094 | Langhammer et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6774669 | Liu et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781408 | Langhammer | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6781410 | Pani et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6788104 | Singh et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6801924 | Green et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6801925 | Green et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6836839 | Master et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6874079 | Hogenauer | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6889238 | Johnson | May 2005 | B2 |
6904471 | Boggs et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6924663 | Masui et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6963890 | Dutta et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6971083 | Farrugia et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6978287 | Langhammer | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6983300 | Ferroussat | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7020673 | Ozawa | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7047272 | Giacalone et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7062526 | Hoyle | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7093204 | Oktem et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7107305 | Deng et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7113969 | Green et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7181484 | Stribaek et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7200631 | Mailaender et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7313585 | Winterrowd | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7395298 | Debes et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7401109 | Koc et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7409417 | Lou | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7415542 | Hennedy et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421465 | Rarick et al. | Sep 2008 | B1 |
7428565 | Fujimori | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7428566 | Siu et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430578 | Debes et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7430656 | Sperber et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7447310 | Koc et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7472155 | Simkins et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7508936 | Eberle et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7536430 | Guevokian et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7567997 | Simkins et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7590676 | Langhammer | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7646430 | Brown Elliott et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7668896 | Lutz et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7719446 | Rosenthal et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7769797 | Cho et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7930335 | Gura | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930336 | Langhammer | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7974997 | Arviv et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
20010023425 | Oberman et al. | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010029515 | Mirsky | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010037352 | Hong | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002573 | Landers et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020038324 | Page et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049798 | Wang et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020078114 | Wang et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020089348 | Langhammer | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020116434 | Nancekievill | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030088757 | Lindner et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040064770 | Xin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040083412 | Corbin et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103133 | Gurney | May 2004 | A1 |
20040122882 | Zakharov et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040148321 | Guevorkian et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040172439 | Lin | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040178818 | Crotty et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040193981 | Clark et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040267857 | Abel et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267863 | Bhushan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050038842 | Stoye | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050144212 | Simkins et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144215 | Simkins et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144216 | Simkins et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050166038 | Wang et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187997 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050187999 | Zheng et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050262175 | Iino et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060020655 | Lin | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20070083585 | St. Denis et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070185951 | Lee et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070185952 | Langhammer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070226287 | Lin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070241773 | Hutchings et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080133627 | Langhammer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080183783 | Tubbs | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090028455 | Nakamura et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090172052 | DeLaquil et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090187615 | Abe et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090300088 | Michaels et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100098189 | Oketani | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20120113133 | Shpigelblat | May 2012 | A1 |
20120191967 | Lin et al. | Jul 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 158 430 | Oct 1985 | EP |
0 380 456 | Aug 1990 | EP |
0 411 491 | Feb 1991 | EP |
0 461 798 | Dec 1991 | EP |
0 498 066 | Aug 1992 | EP |
0 555 092 | Aug 1993 | EP |
0 606 653 | Jul 1994 | EP |
0 657 803 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 660 227 | Jun 1995 | EP |
0 668 659 | Aug 1995 | EP |
0 721 159 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0 905 906 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0 909 028 | Apr 1999 | EP |
0 927 393 | Jul 1999 | EP |
0 992 885 | Apr 2000 | EP |
1 031 934 | Aug 2000 | EP |
1 058 185 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1 220 108 | Jul 2002 | EP |
2 283 602 | May 1995 | GB |
2 286 737 | Aug 1995 | GB |
2 318 198 | Apr 1998 | GB |
61-237133 | Oct 1986 | JP |
63-216131 | Aug 1988 | JP |
4-332036 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-134851 | Jun 1993 | JP |
06-187129 | Jul 1994 | JP |
7-135447 | May 1995 | JP |
11-296345 | Oct 1999 | JP |
2000-259394 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2002-108606 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-251281 | Sep 2002 | JP |
WO95-27243 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO96-28774 | Sep 1996 | WO |
WO97-08606 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO98-12629 | Mar 1998 | WO |
WO98-32071 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO98-38741 | Sep 1998 | WO |
WO99-22292 | May 1999 | WO |
WO99-31574 | Jun 1999 | WO |
WO99-56394 | Nov 1999 | WO |
WO00-51239 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO00-52824 | Sep 2000 | WO |
WO01-13562 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2005066832 | Jul 2005 | WO |
WO2005-101190 | Oct 2005 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Altera Corporation, “Stratix II Device Handbook, Chapter 6—DSP Blocks in Stratix II Devices,” v1.1, Jul. 2004. |
Xilinx Inc., “Complex Multiplier v2.0”, DS291 Product Specification/Datasheet, Nov. 2004. |
Haynes, S.D., et al., “Configurable multiplier blocks for embedding in FPGAs,” Electronics Letters, vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 638-639 (Apr. 2, 1998). |
Altera Corporation, “FIR Compiler: MegaCore® Function User Guide,” version 3.3.0, rev. 1, pp. 3 11 through 3 15 (Oct. 2005). |
Govindu, G. et al., “A Library of Parameterizable Floating-Point Cores for FPGAs and Their Application to Scientific Computing,” Proc Int'l Conf. Eng. Reconfigurable Systems and Algorithms (ERSA'05), Jun. 2005. |
Govindu, G. et al., “Analysis of High-performance Floating-point Arithmetic on FPGAs,” Proceedings of the 18th International Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (PDPS'04), pp. 149-156, Apr. 2004. |
Nakasato, N., et al., “Acceleration of Hydrosynamical Simulations using a FPGA board”, The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-47, vol. 105, No. 515, Jan. 17, 2006. |
Osana, Y., et al., “Hardware-resource Utilization Analysis on an FPGA-Based Biochemical Simulator ReCSiP”, The Institute of Electronics Information and Communication Technical Report CPSY2005-63, vol. 105, No. 516, Jan. 18, 2006. |
Vladimirova, T. et al., “Floating-Point Mathematical Co-Processor for a Single-Chip On-Board Computer,” MAPLD'03 Conference, D5, Sep. 2003. |
Altera Corporation, “Digital Signal Processing (DSP),” Stratix Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6 and Chapter 7, v1.1 (Sep. 2004). |
Altera Corporation, “DSP Blocks in Stratix II and Stratix II GX Devices,” Stratix II Device Handbook, vol. 2, Chapter 6, v4.0 (Oct. 2005). |
Amos, D., “PLD architectures match DSP algorithms,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 17, No. 7, Jul. 1996, pp. 30, 32. |
Analog Devices, Inc., The Applications Engineering Staff of Analog Devices, DSP Division, Digital Signal Processing Applications Using the ADSP-2100 Family (edited by Amy Mar), 1990, pp. 141-192). |
Andrejas, J., et al., “Reusable DSP functions in FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfiourable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 456-461. |
Aoki, T., “Signed-weight arithmetic and its application to a field-programmable digital filter architecture,” IEICE Transactions on Electronics , 1999 , vol. E82C, No. 9, Sep. 1999, pp. 1687-1698. |
Ashour, M.A., et al., “An FPGA implementation guide for some different types of serial-parallel multiplier-structures,” Microelectronics Journal , vol. 31, No. 3, 2000, pp. 161-168. |
Berg, B.L., et al.“Designing Power and Area Efficient Multistage FIR Decimators with Economical Low Order Filters,” ChipCenter Technical Note, Dec. 2001. |
Bursky, D., “Programmable Logic Challenges Traditional ASIC SoC Designs”, Electronic Design, Apr. 15, 2002. |
Chhabra, A. et al., Texas Instruments Inc., “A Block Floating Point Implementation on the TMS320C54x DSP”, Application Report SPRA610, Dec. 1999, pp. 1-10. |
Colet, p., “When DSPs and FPGAs meet: Optimizing image processing architectures,” Advanced Imaging, vol. 12, No. 9, Sep. 1997, pp. 14, 16, 18. |
Crookes, D., et al., “Design and implementation of a high level programming environment for FPGA-based image processing,” IEE Proceedings—Vision, Image and Signal Processing, vol. 147, No. 4, Aug. 2000, pp. 377-384. |
Debowski, L., et al., “A new flexible architecture of digital control systems based on DSP and complex CPLD technology for power conversion applications,” PCIM 2000: Europe Official Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh International Intelligent Motion Conference, Jun. 6-8, 2000, pp. 281-286. |
Dick, C., et al., “Configurable logic for digital communications: some signal processing perspectives,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 37, No. 8, Aug. 1999, pp. 107-111. |
Do, T.-T., et al., “A flexible implementation of high-performance FIR filters on Xilinx FPGAs,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications: From FPGAs to Computing Paradigm. 8th International Workshop, FPL'98. Proceedings, Hartenstein, R.W., et al., eds., Aug. 31-Sep. 3, 1998, pp. 441-445. |
Gaffer, A.A., et al., “Floating-Point Bitwidth Analysis via Automatic Differentiation,” IEEE Conference on Field Programmable Technology, Hong Kong, Dec. 2002. |
Guccione, S.A.,“Run-time Reconfiguration at Xilinx,” Parallel and distributed processing: 15 IPDPS 2000 workshops, Rolim, J., ed., May 1-5, 2000, p. 873. |
Hauck, S., “The Future of Reconfigurable Systems,” Keynote Address, 5th Canadian Conference on Field Programmable Devices, Jun. 1998, http:--www.ee.washington.edu-people-faculty-hauck-publications-ReconfigFuture.PDF. |
Heysters, P.M., et al., “Mapping of DSP algorithms on field programmable function arrays,” Field-Programmable Logic and Applications. Roadmap to Reconfigurable Computing. 10th International Conference, FPL 2000. Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1896), Aug. 27-30, 2000, pp. 400-411. |
Huang, J., et al., “Simulated Performance of 1000BASE-T Receiver with Different Analog Front End Designs,” Proceedings of the 35th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Nov. 4-7, 2001. |
Lattice Semiconductor Corp, ORCA® FPGA Express™ Interface Manual: ispLEVER® Version 3.0, 2002. |
Lucent Technologies, Microelectronics Group,“Implementing and Optimizing Multipliers in ORCA™ FPGAs,”, Application Note.AP97-008FGPA, Feb. 1997. |
“Implementing Multipliers in FLEX 10K EABs”, Altera, Mar. 1996. |
“Implementing Logic with the Embedded Array in FLEX 10K Devices”, Altera, May 2001, ver. 2.1. |
Jinghua Li, “Design a pocket multi-bit multiplier in FPGA,” 1996 2nd International Conference on ASIC Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 96TH8140), Oct. 21-24, 1996, pp. 275-279. |
Jones, G., “Field-programmable digital signal conditioning,” Electronic Product Design, vol. 21, No. 6, Jun. 2000, pp. C36-C38. |
Kiefer, R., et al., “Performance comparison of software-FPGA hardware partitions for a DSP application,” 14th Australian Microelectronics Conference. Microelectronics: Technology Today for the Future. MICRO '97 Proceedings, Sep. 28-Oct. 1, 1997, pp. 88-93. |
Kramberger, I., “DSP acceleration using a reconfigurable FPGA,” ISIE '99. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (Cat. No. 99TH8465), vol. 3 , Jul. 12-16, 1999, pp. 1522-1525. |
Langhammer, M., “How to implement DSP in programmable logic,” Elettronica Oggi, No. 266 , Dec. 1998, pp. 113-115. |
Langhammer, M., “Implementing a DSP in Programmable Logic,” Online EE Times, May 1998, http:--www.eetimes.com-editorial-1998-coverstory9805.html. |
Lazaravich, B.V., “Function block oriented field programmable logic arrays,” Motorola, Inc. Technical Developments, vol. 18, Mar. 1993, pp. 10-11. |
Lund, D., et al., “A new development system for reconfigurable digital signal processing,” First International Conference on 3G Mobile Communication Technologies (Conf. Publ. No. 471), Mar. 27-29, 2000, pp. 306-310. |
Miller, N.L., et al., “Reconfigurable integrated circuit for high performance computer arithmetic,” Proceedings of the 1998 IEE Colloquium on Evolvable Hardware Systems (Digest), No. 233, 1998, pp. 2-1-2-4. |
Mintzer, L., “Xilinx FPGA as an FFT processor,” Electronic Engineering, vol. 69, No. 845, May 1997, pp. 81, 82, 84. |
Faura et al., “A Novel Mixed Signal Programmable Device With On-Chip Microprocessor,” Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, 1997. Proceedings of the IEEE 1997 Santa Clara, CA, USA, May 5, 1997, pp. 103-106. |
Nozal, L., et al., “A new vision system: programmable logic devices and digital signal processor architecture (PLD+DSP),” Proceedings IECON '91. 1991 International Conference on Industrial Electronics, Control and Instrumentation (Cat. No. 91CH2976-9), vol. 3, Oct. 28-Nov. 1, 1991, pp. 2014-2018. |
Papenfuss, J.R, et al., “Implementation of a real-time, frequency selective, RF channel simulator using a hybrid DSP-FPGA architecture,” RAWCON 2000: 2000 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No. 00EX404), Sep. 10-13, 2000, pp. 135-138. |
Parhami, B., “Configurable arithmetic arrays with data-driven control,” 34th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol. 1, 2000, pp. 89-93. |
“The QuickDSP Design Guide”, Quicklogic, Aug. 2001, revision B. |
“QuickDSP™ Family Data Sheet”, Quicklogic, Aug. 7, 2001, revision B. |
Rangasayee, K., “Complex PLDs let you produce efficient arithmetic designs,” EDN (European Edition), vol. 41, No. 13, Jun. 20, 1996, pp. 109, 110, 112, 114, 116. |
Rosado, A., et al., “A high-speed multiplier coprocessor unit based on FPGA,” Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 48, No. 11-12, 1997, pp. 298-302. |
Santillan-Q., G.F., et al., “Real-time integer convolution implemented using systolic arrays and a digit-serial architecture in complex programmable logic devices,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Design of Mixed-Mode Integrated Circuits and Applications (Cat. No. 99EX303), Jul. 26-28, 1999, pp. 147-150. |
Texas Instruments Inc., “TMS320C54x DSP Reference Set, vol. 1: CPU and Peripherals”, Literature No. SPRU131F, Apr. 1999, pp. 2-1 through 2-16 and 4-1 through 4-29. |
Tisserand, A., et al., “An on-line arithmetic based FPGA for low power custom computing,” Field Programmable Logic and Applications, 9th International Workshop, FPL'99, Proceedings (Lecture Notes in Computer Science vol. 1673), Lysaght, P., et al., eds., Aug. 30-Sep. 1, 1999, pp. 264-273. |
Tralka, C., “Symbiosis of DSP and PLD,” Elektronik, vol. 49, No. 14 , Jul. 11, 2000, pp. 84-96. |
Underwood, K. “FPGAs vs. CPUs: Trends in Peak Floating-Point Performance,” Proceedings of the 2004 ACM-SIGDA 12th International Symposium on Field Programmable Gate Arrays, pp. 171-180, Feb. 22-24, 2004. |
Valls, J., et al., “A Study About FPGA-Based Digital Filters,” Signal Processing Systems, 1998, SIPS 98, 1998 IEEE Workshop, Oct. 10, 1998, pp. 192-201. |
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Jan. 25, 2001, module 2 of 4. |
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 1 of 4. |
“Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Xilinx, Apr. 2, 2001, module 2 of 4. |
Walters, A.L., “A Scaleable FIR Filter Implementation Using 32-bit Floating-Point Complex Arithmetic on ,a FPGA Based Custom Computing Platform,” Allison L. Walters, Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Jan. 30, 1998. |
Weisstein, E.W., “Karatsuba Multiplication,” MathWorld—A Wolfram Web Resource (Dec. 9, 2007), accessed Dec. 11, 2007 at http:--mathworld.wolfram.com-KaratsubaMultiplication.html. |
Wenzel, L., “Field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) to replace digital signal processor integrated circuits,” Elektronik , vol. 49, No. 5, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 78-86. |
“Xilinx Unveils New FPGA Architecture to Enable High-Performance, 10 Million System Gate Designs”, Xilinx, Jun. 22, 2000. |
“Xilinx Announces DSP Algorithms, Tools and Features for Virtex-II Architecture”, Xilinx, Nov. 21, 2000. |
Xilinx Inc., “Virtex-II 1.5V Field-Programmable Gate Arrays”, Advance Product Specification, DS031-2 (v1.9), Nov. 29, 2001, Module 2 of 4, pp. 1-39. |
Xilinx Inc., “Using Embedded Multipliers”, Virtex-II Platform FPGA Handbook, UG002 (v1.3), Dec. 3, 2001, pp. 251-257. |
Xilinx, Inc., “A 1D Systolic FIR,” copyright 1994-2002, downloaded from http:--www.iro.umontreal.ca-˜aboulham-F6221-Xilinx%20A%201D%20systolic%20FIR.htm. |
Xilinx, Inc., “The Future of FPGA's,” White Paper, available Nov. 14, 2005 for download from http:--www.xilinx.com-prs—rls,5yrwhite.htm. |
Xilinx Inc., “XtremeDSP Design Considerations User Guide,” v 1.2, Feb. 4, 2005. |
Kim, Y., et al., “Fast GPU Implementation for the Solution of Tridiagonal Matrix Systems,” Journal of Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers, vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 692-704, Dec. 2005. |
Altera Corporation, “Advanced Synthesis Cookbook: A Design Guide for Stratix II, Stratix III and Stratix IV Devices,” Document Version 3.0, 112 pgs., May 2008. |
deDinechin, F. et al., “Large multipliers with less DSP blocks,” retrieved from http://hal-ens-lyon.archives-ouvertes.fr/ensl-00356421/en/, 9 pgs., available online Jan. 2009. |
Wajih, E.-H.Y. et al., “Efficient Hardware Architecture of Recursive Karatsuba-Ofman Multiplier,” 3rd International Conference on Design and Technology of Integrated Systems in Nanoscale Era, 6 pgs, Mar. 2008. |
Zhou, G. et al., “Efficient and High-Throughput Implementations of AES-GCM on FPGAs,” International Conference on Field-Programmable Technology, 8 pgs., Dec. 2007. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110238720 A1 | Sep 2011 | US |