The present disclosure relates to ink jet printers and, more particularly, relates to sonic leak testing on ink delivery system and ink jet heads.
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
Ink jet print systems tend to be very sensitive to piping leaks. Ink jet print systems typically have internal ink delivery systems that are made up of ink lines, manifolds, valves, bulkhead fittings, fluid pumps, gages, and other fittings necessary to deliver and control ink at the ink jet heads. Leaks in the piping can cause ink spills and pressure fluctuations that have a negative effect on system performance. However, the most severe problem is caused by the smallest leaks, as they can allow air bubbles back into the ink stream, causing print heads to perform inconsistently.
Large leaks in ink delivery systems can be identified by sight, sound, or feel. The application of soapy water to the exterior of the ink lines and fittings can detect smaller leaks. However, there are leaks that are too small to be detected with the above methods, and these smallest leaks are the most important to eliminate because the quantity of leaks can be high in a complex ink system, they would otherwise go un-noticed because of their small size, and they allow air into the ink system, which causes print heads to operate erratically.
According to the principles of the present teachings, a method is provided that is superior to those methods previously used in that it allows the detection of significantly smaller leaks, can be done during printer build phases or at any time in a print system's life cycle, can pinpoint a leak to an exact fitting or sealing surface, and can detect leaks in either pressurized or vacuumed ink delivery systems. Fittings can be leak checked under pressure and confirmed leak free under vacuum, giving higher confidence in overall system integrity. Finally, the device according to the present teachings can be permanently mounted on a print machine to continually sense system leaks, reporting or signaling to the operator when a leak is detected.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses.
In some embodiments, the present teachings employ ultrasonic leak detectors to search for piping leaks in an ink delivery system. The smallest leaks are the most important to eliminate as air entrapment into the ink stream creates numerous print difficulties. The ultrasonic leak detector contains a very sensitive microphone that is precisely tuned to the sound frequencies common when pressurized air escapes from containment. The leak detector can “hear” the sound of pressure and vacuum leaks and gives the operator positive feedback when a leak is detected.
With reference to
Still referring to
In some embodiments, leak detection microphone 14 can comprise a highly sensitive microphone that is specifically tuned for leak detection at a known frequency range. However, it should be understood that this known frequency range is dependent upon the specific configuration and equipment used in the ink jet system 100 and, thus, should be selected based on the specific configuration for optimized performance. In some embodiments, leak detection microphone 14 can comprise a ceramic, magnetic, or other advanced microphone technology to convert the sonic vibrations generated from the leak to the electrical signal 15.
As seen in
To further enhance the utility of the present disclosure, signal noise can be eliminated, or at least minimized, for improved detection results. In order to filter out any remaining signal noise or unwanted sonic frequencies, the electrical signal 15 from leak detection microphone 14 can be processed according to one of a number of methods. For example, as illustrated in
In some embodiments, output device 16 can comprise a visual device, such as a display monitor or light; an audible device, such as a speaker system; and/or a tactile device, such as a vibration system. It should be appreciated, however, that output device 16 can be any one of a number of devices used to signal or alert an operator of a condition.
During testing, ultrasonic leak detector 10 is positioned such that leak detection microphone 14 is in close proximity to the fittings being tested. In some embodiments, a vacuum can be created in the line to be test to accentuate the audible signal of leak 102. Ultrasonic leak detector 10 helps the operator detect and zone in on the leak through its positive feedback features, showing more visual indicators or sound volume as the leak is approached. The leak can then be found, corrected and retested, under air pressure or vacuum or both in a sequence. Use of the principles of the present teachings provides the user with a leak free ink system that will give optimized print performance.
The present teachings are best used during the building phase of an ink delivery system or printing machine, but are also useful at any time during a print machine's or ink jet system's life cycle. The detector can be placed permanently onto the print machine and could continuously “listen” or monitor for air or vacuum leaks.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/847,655 filed on Sep. 27, 2006. The disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3571514 | Wruk | Mar 1971 | A |
3869986 | Hubbard | Mar 1975 | A |
4465800 | Bhatia | Aug 1984 | A |
4493252 | Clark | Jan 1985 | A |
4803119 | Duff et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5104448 | Kruse | Apr 1992 | A |
5154761 | Cooke et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5160535 | Cooke et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5376169 | Hotomi et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5393331 | Loria et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5417113 | Hartley | May 1995 | A |
5443628 | Loria et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5467973 | Graushar et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5510415 | Zahrobsky et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5565143 | Chan | Oct 1996 | A |
5616540 | Lithgow et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630363 | Davis et al. | May 1997 | A |
5710377 | Youngquist et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5725985 | Nealey et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5739833 | Yamazaki et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5985079 | Ellison | Nov 1999 | A |
6019046 | Rodi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6048914 | Goto et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6113679 | Adkins et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6126281 | Shimoda et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6231654 | Elwakil | May 2001 | B1 |
6247353 | Battenberg et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6254218 | Suzuki et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6276273 | Aurenty et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6328418 | Yamada et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6346353 | Wang et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6413590 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6443568 | Askeland et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6455136 | Okajima et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6523949 | Ewert | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530645 | Haflinger | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6533379 | Kubota et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6575558 | Grose et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585369 | Sievert et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6588889 | Jeanmaire | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6675646 | Nishihara et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6725705 | Huebler et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
20010007464 | Kellett | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20020029723 | Fox et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020109738 | Ozawa | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020183419 | Lin et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030081061 | Gunther et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030143346 | Yoshizawa et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030214554 | Tschida | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030218663 | Baxter et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030224150 | Ludwig et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040023087 | Redmond | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040080595 | Taguchi et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090866 | Goodman et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040121173 | St. Arnauld | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040179062 | Rai et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040201661 | Li | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050129879 | Bodis | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050189066 | Look et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050264622 | Silverbrook et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060050286 | Silverbrook et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060092221 | Jeong | May 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10051088 | Apr 2002 | DE |
0628956 | Dec 1994 | EP |
963854 | Dec 1999 | EP |
1293344 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1308491 | May 2003 | EP |
1367101 | Dec 2003 | EP |
09071040 | Mar 1997 | JP |
2004034675 | Feb 2004 | JP |
WO-0145957 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO-02055619 | Jul 2002 | WO |
WO-0206294 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-02062894 | Aug 2002 | WO |
WO-2004022353 | Mar 2004 | WO |
WO-2004043702 | May 2004 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080074460 A1 | Mar 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60847655 | Sep 2006 | US |