Sonic leak testing on ink delivery systems and ink jet heads

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7770999
  • Patent Number
    7,770,999
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, September 27, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 10, 2010
    14 years ago
Abstract
A method of detecting a leak in an ink delivery system comprises providing an ink delivery system having a plurality of pipes, wherein the ink delivery system could potentially have an ink leak producing an audible signal. The method further comprises providing an ultrasonic detector operable to detect the audible signal and actuating the ultrasonic detector to detect when the ink leak is present by detecting the presence of the audible signal. Finally, the method comprises outputting a signal when the audible signal is detected to alert a user.
Description
FIELD

The present disclosure relates to ink jet printers and, more particularly, relates to sonic leak testing on ink delivery system and ink jet heads.


BACKGROUND

The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.


Ink jet print systems tend to be very sensitive to piping leaks. Ink jet print systems typically have internal ink delivery systems that are made up of ink lines, manifolds, valves, bulkhead fittings, fluid pumps, gages, and other fittings necessary to deliver and control ink at the ink jet heads. Leaks in the piping can cause ink spills and pressure fluctuations that have a negative effect on system performance. However, the most severe problem is caused by the smallest leaks, as they can allow air bubbles back into the ink stream, causing print heads to perform inconsistently.


Large leaks in ink delivery systems can be identified by sight, sound, or feel. The application of soapy water to the exterior of the ink lines and fittings can detect smaller leaks. However, there are leaks that are too small to be detected with the above methods, and these smallest leaks are the most important to eliminate because the quantity of leaks can be high in a complex ink system, they would otherwise go un-noticed because of their small size, and they allow air into the ink system, which causes print heads to operate erratically.


SUMMARY

According to the principles of the present teachings, a method is provided that is superior to those methods previously used in that it allows the detection of significantly smaller leaks, can be done during printer build phases or at any time in a print system's life cycle, can pinpoint a leak to an exact fitting or sealing surface, and can detect leaks in either pressurized or vacuumed ink delivery systems. Fittings can be leak checked under pressure and confirmed leak free under vacuum, giving higher confidence in overall system integrity. Finally, the device according to the present teachings can be permanently mounted on a print machine to continually sense system leaks, reporting or signaling to the operator when a leak is detected.


Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.





DRAWINGS

The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.



FIG. 1 is a schematic view illustrating an ultrasonic leak detector according to some embodiments of the present teachings; and



FIG. 2 is a flowchart showing a processing circuitry according to some embodiments of the present teachings.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses.


In some embodiments, the present teachings employ ultrasonic leak detectors to search for piping leaks in an ink delivery system. The smallest leaks are the most important to eliminate as air entrapment into the ink stream creates numerous print difficulties. The ultrasonic leak detector contains a very sensitive microphone that is precisely tuned to the sound frequencies common when pressurized air escapes from containment. The leak detector can “hear” the sound of pressure and vacuum leaks and gives the operator positive feedback when a leak is detected.


With reference to FIGS. 1 and 2, an ultrasonic leak detector 10 is disclosed for ultrasonic detection of ink leaks 102 (i.e. audible signals) in an ink jet system 100 (partially shown in FIG. 1). Ultrasonic leak detector 10 can comprise a power supply controller 12 operably coupled to a leak detection microphone 14. Leak detection microphone 14 is operable to receive a sound wave input (i.e. audible signals from ink leaks 102) and generate a corresponding electrical signal 15. The corresponding electrical signal 15 is then fed to power supply controller 12 for processing as will be described herein. In some embodiments, power supply controller 12 can then output an operator feedback signal 208 to an output device 16 to alert a user.


Still referring to FIG. 1, power supply controller 12 can comprise a housing 18 containing a power supply 20, processing circuitry 22, and/or operator controls 24. It should be understood that power supply 20 can include a battery supply, an alternating current supply, and/or a renewable energy supply.


In some embodiments, leak detection microphone 14 can comprise a highly sensitive microphone that is specifically tuned for leak detection at a known frequency range. However, it should be understood that this known frequency range is dependent upon the specific configuration and equipment used in the ink jet system 100 and, thus, should be selected based on the specific configuration for optimized performance. In some embodiments, leak detection microphone 14 can comprise a ceramic, magnetic, or other advanced microphone technology to convert the sonic vibrations generated from the leak to the electrical signal 15.


As seen in FIG. 1, ultrasonic leak detector 10 can further comprise a sound channeling system 30 for directing sound from the leak toward leak detection microphone 14. This can be helpful to permit detection of low volume (amplitude) leaks. The sound channeling system 30 can comprise one or more baffles 32 for directing the sound toward leak detection microphone 14. It should be appreciated that other configurations can also be used.


To further enhance the utility of the present disclosure, signal noise can be eliminated, or at least minimized, for improved detection results. In order to filter out any remaining signal noise or unwanted sonic frequencies, the electrical signal 15 from leak detection microphone 14 can be processed according to one of a number of methods. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 2, the electrical signal 15 from leak detection microphone 14 can be input to processing circuitry 22 at method step 200. The signal can then be amplified, if necessary, at step 202 to achieve signal attributes conducive to later processing and/or detection. This amplified signal, generally referenced as 203, can be processed according to processing step 204. In some embodiments, processing step 204 can include passage of amplified signal 203 through a low pass electronic filter 205 for attenuation of low-band frequencies, a high pass electronic filter 206 for attenuation of high-band frequencies, and/or an electronic algorithm 207 to attenuate the unwanted frequencies from being processed. It should be understood that electronic algorithm 207 could also be used to amplify and attenuate electrical signal 15 in a single step. Electronic algorithms 207 may also be used to identify those frequencies associated with leaks. The presence and/or absence of a leak can be output as an operator feedback signal 208 to output device 16.


In some embodiments, output device 16 can comprise a visual device, such as a display monitor or light; an audible device, such as a speaker system; and/or a tactile device, such as a vibration system. It should be appreciated, however, that output device 16 can be any one of a number of devices used to signal or alert an operator of a condition.


During testing, ultrasonic leak detector 10 is positioned such that leak detection microphone 14 is in close proximity to the fittings being tested. In some embodiments, a vacuum can be created in the line to be test to accentuate the audible signal of leak 102. Ultrasonic leak detector 10 helps the operator detect and zone in on the leak through its positive feedback features, showing more visual indicators or sound volume as the leak is approached. The leak can then be found, corrected and retested, under air pressure or vacuum or both in a sequence. Use of the principles of the present teachings provides the user with a leak free ink system that will give optimized print performance.


The present teachings are best used during the building phase of an ink delivery system or printing machine, but are also useful at any time during a print machine's or ink jet system's life cycle. The detector can be placed permanently onto the print machine and could continuously “listen” or monitor for air or vacuum leaks.

Claims
  • 1. An ultrasonic leak detector comprising: a leak detection microphone;a sound channeling system that is positionable relative to said leak detection microphone for directing an audible signal from a leak in an ink delivery system to the leak detection microphone, wherein the sound channeling system comprises a plurality of baffles, the baffles being wider at the side closest to the leak than the side closest to the leak detection microphone;wherein the leak detection microphone operable to receive the directed audible signal and output an electrical signal;an amplifier for amplifying the electrical signal;a processing circuit for receiving the amplified electrical signal comprising: a low pass filter for attenuating low-band frequencies from the amplified electrical signal; anda high pass filter for attenuating high-band frequencies from the amplified electrical signal;wherein the processing circuit applies an electronic algorithm to the amplified electrical signal to attenuate unwanted frequencies, the processing circuit generating an operator feedback signal; andan output device for receiving the operator feedback signal and alerting a user.
  • 2. The ultrasonic leak detector according to claim 1 wherein the leak detection microphone is a ceramic microphone.
  • 3. The ultrasonic leak detector according to claim 1 wherein the leak detection microphone is a magnetic microphone.
  • 4. The ultrasonic leak detector according to claim 1 wherein the output device is an audible device.
  • 5. The ultrasonic leak detector according to claim 1 wherein the output device is a visual device.
  • 6. The ultrasonic leak detector according to claim 1 wherein the output device is a tactile device.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/847,655 filed on Sep. 27, 2006. The disclosure of the above application is incorporated herein by reference.

US Referenced Citations (62)
Number Name Date Kind
3571514 Wruk Mar 1971 A
3869986 Hubbard Mar 1975 A
4465800 Bhatia Aug 1984 A
4493252 Clark Jan 1985 A
4803119 Duff et al. Feb 1989 A
5104448 Kruse Apr 1992 A
5154761 Cooke et al. Oct 1992 A
5160535 Cooke et al. Nov 1992 A
5376169 Hotomi et al. Dec 1994 A
5393331 Loria et al. Feb 1995 A
5417113 Hartley May 1995 A
5443628 Loria et al. Aug 1995 A
5467973 Graushar et al. Nov 1995 A
5510415 Zahrobsky et al. Apr 1996 A
5565143 Chan Oct 1996 A
5616540 Lithgow et al. Apr 1997 A
5630363 Davis et al. May 1997 A
5710377 Youngquist et al. Jan 1998 A
5725985 Nealey et al. Mar 1998 A
5739833 Yamazaki et al. Apr 1998 A
5985079 Ellison Nov 1999 A
6019046 Rodi et al. Feb 2000 A
6048914 Goto et al. Apr 2000 A
6113679 Adkins et al. Sep 2000 A
6126281 Shimoda et al. Oct 2000 A
6231654 Elwakil May 2001 B1
6247353 Battenberg et al. Jun 2001 B1
6254218 Suzuki et al. Jul 2001 B1
6276273 Aurenty et al. Aug 2001 B1
6328418 Yamada et al. Dec 2001 B1
6346353 Wang et al. Feb 2002 B1
6413590 Anderson et al. Jul 2002 B1
6443568 Askeland et al. Sep 2002 B1
6455136 Okajima et al. Sep 2002 B1
6523949 Ewert Feb 2003 B1
6530645 Haflinger Mar 2003 B2
6533379 Kubota et al. Mar 2003 B1
6575558 Grose et al. Jun 2003 B1
6585369 Sievert et al. Jul 2003 B1
6588889 Jeanmaire Jul 2003 B2
6675646 Nishihara et al. Jan 2004 B2
6725705 Huebler et al. Apr 2004 B1
20010007464 Kellett Jul 2001 A1
20020029723 Fox et al. Mar 2002 A1
20020109738 Ozawa Aug 2002 A1
20020183419 Lin et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030081061 Gunther et al. May 2003 A1
20030143346 Yoshizawa et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030214554 Tschida Nov 2003 A1
20030218663 Baxter et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030224150 Ludwig et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040023087 Redmond Feb 2004 A1
20040080595 Taguchi et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040090866 Goodman et al. May 2004 A1
20040121173 St. Arnauld Jun 2004 A1
20040179062 Rai et al. Sep 2004 A1
20040201661 Li Oct 2004 A1
20050129879 Bodis Jun 2005 A1
20050189066 Look et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050264622 Silverbrook et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060050286 Silverbrook et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060092221 Jeong May 2006 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (14)
Number Date Country
10051088 Apr 2002 DE
0628956 Dec 1994 EP
963854 Dec 1999 EP
1293344 Mar 2003 EP
1308491 May 2003 EP
1367101 Dec 2003 EP
09071040 Mar 1997 JP
2004034675 Feb 2004 JP
WO-0145957 Jun 2001 WO
WO-02055619 Jul 2002 WO
WO-0206294 Aug 2002 WO
WO-02062894 Aug 2002 WO
WO-2004022353 Mar 2004 WO
WO-2004043702 May 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080074460 A1 Mar 2008 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60847655 Sep 2006 US