Sonic transducer and feedback control method thereof

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6392327
  • Patent Number
    6,392,327
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, March 29, 2000
    24 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 21, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A sonic transducer includes a transducer body and a drive element coupled to the transducer body to produce a sonic output in response to an applied electrical input. A sense element is coupled to the sonic drive element and is configured to provide an electrical feedback output related to the sonic output. The electrical feedback output is adapted to be used to control the applied electrical input to the sonic drive element so as to control the energy delivered to the working area or tip of the transducer.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to transducers of the type used to produce a sonic output. More specifically, the present invention relates to controlling the sonic output from a transducer using a feedback technique.




Sonic transducers, and in particular ultrasonic transducers, are used in a wide variety of applications to provide a sonic output. For example, ultrasonic transducers are used for imaging, medical therapy, motors, sonar systems, welding, cleaning, instrumentation, chemical activation, machining and vaporizing. One example use in the medical field is in the Copalis® testing system available from DiaSorin Inc. of Stillwater, Minn. In the Copalis® testing system, an ultrasonic transducer is used for resuspension of particles in a fluid.




One problem commonly associated with ultrasonic transducers is the inability to accurately control the energy delivered by the ultrasonic transducer. This is largely due to the inability to accurately determine the energy level of the ultrasonic output provided by a drive element in the transducer. This has made it difficult to accurately ascertain whether the ultrasonic transducer is providing the desired level of ultrasonic energy to the work piece.




One technique used to overcome the problem of controlling the output is to accurately calibrate the transducer prior to use. However, the output energy level is dependent upon a number of different factors and can experience drift during operation. For example, a change in the force applied to the transducer can affect the energy output. The delivered energy level is also affected by factors such as drive voltage, ambient temperature, temperature rise due to self heating of the transducer during operation, and a change in the resonant frequency of the transducer. This problem is exacerbated because the ultrasonic transducer must operate in the stable and desired frequency regimes in order to operate efficiently.




One technique for automatically controlling the drive signal frequency applied to an ultrasonic transducer is to compare the phase of the drive voltage signal to the phase of the drive current signal. When the voltage and current signals are in phase, the ultrasonic transducer is operating at a resonant frequency. However, this technique is complex, inefficient, and does not provide a direct indication of the amount of energy in the ultrasonic transducer. Another technique is to use a separate sensor spaced apart from the ultrasonic transducer to monitor the energy output. However, this technique is sensitive to standing waves which may cause inaccurate readings. Further, this technique can be inaccurate due to interfacial changes between materials.




Other techniques of controlling the transducer use a sense element to determine if the transducer is operating at resonance. Such techniques are described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 3,889,166, issued Jun. 10, 1975, and entitled AUTOMATIC FREQUENCY CONTROL FOR A SANDWICH TRANSDUCER USING VOLTAGE FEEDBACK; U.S. Pat. No. 4,197,478, issued Apr. 8, 1980, and entitled ELECTRONICALLY TUNABLE RESONANT ACCELEROMETER; U.S. Pat. No. 4,728,843, issued Mar. 1, 1988, and entitled ULTRASONIC VIBRATOR AND DRIVE CONTROL METHOD THEREOF; U.S. Pat. No. 4,441,044, issued Apr. 3, 1984, and entitled TRANSDUCER WITH A PIEZOELECTRIC SENSOR ELEMENT; and U.S. Pat. No. 5,536,963, issued Jul. 16, 1996, and entitled MICRODEVICE WITH FERROELECTRIC FOR SENSING OR APPLYING A FORCE. Although above mentioned techniques describe the use of a separate sense element to detect if the transducer is operating at a mechanical resonant frequency, these techniques have not monitored and controlled the energy level of the transducer.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




A sonic transducer includes a transducer body and a sonic drive element coupled to the transducer body to produce a sonic output in response to an applied electrical input. An electromechanical transducer such as a sonic transducer includes a transducer body and an electromechanical drive element coupled to the transducer body to produce an electromechanical output, such as a sonic output in response to an applied electrical input. A sense element is coupled to the drive element and is configured to provide an electrical feedback output related to the electromechanical output. The electrical feedback output is adapted to be used to control the applied electrical input to the drive element.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a side cutaway view showing a transducer system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.





FIG. 2

is a side cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a transducer for use in the system of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3

is a side cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a transducer for use in the system of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 4

is a side cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a transducer for use in the system of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 5

is a side cross-sectional view of one embodiment of a transducer for use in the system of FIG.


1


.





FIGS. 6A

,


6


B and


6


C are top plan views of example configurations for sense or drive elements for use with an ultrasonic transducer.





FIG. 7

is a graph of a feedback voltage versus tip amplitude in μm.





FIG. 8

is a graph of normalized tip amplitude versus temperature for an ultrasonic transducer having feedback control and an ultrasonic transducer having no feedback control.





FIG. 9

is an exploded view showing an ultrasonic transducer of

FIG. 1

is greater detail.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATIVE EMBODIMENTS





FIG. 1

is a simplified diagram of a system


10


which includes a transducer


12


in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention coupled to electronics


14


.

FIG. 1

shows a side cutaway view of transducer


12


which includes a transducer body


16


, drive elements


18


and sense elements


20


. Electrodes


22




a


-


22




f


are sandwiched between adjacent elements


18


or


20


to form a stack of separated elements as shown in

FIG. 1. A

backing plate


24


is attached to the transducer body


16


using screw


26


to thereby compress elements


18


and 20.




In one preferred embodiment, elements


18


and


20


are comprised of piezoelectric materials, however any appropriate drive or sense element may be used in accordance with the invention. Drive elements


18


are electrically coupled to drive circuitry


28


through electrodes


22




a


and


22




c.


Electrode


22




b


provides an electrical ground. Drive circuitry


28


applies an electrical input to drive elements


18


to thereby produce a output which is transferred to transducer body


16


. Sense elements


20


couple to sense signal circuitry


30


through electrical contact


22




e.


The output from electrical contact


22




e


is an electrical feedback signal which is used by sense signal circuit to provide a control signal


32


to drive circuit


28


to maintain desired output.




The drive elements


18


can be any material which exhibits a piezoelectric effect. The drive elements


18


are excited by an applied electrical input provided by drive circuit


28


to produce a mechanical displacement that transforms into the sonic output. Typically, the electrical input includes an AC component having a frequency related to a desired output frequency from the transducer


12


. The sense elements


20


also use a piezoelectric effect to generate a separate and distinct electrical output signal in response to the mechanical displacement from the drive elements


18


. Any changes in the operational characteristics of the drive elements


18


which produces a change in the mechanical displacement or resultant sonic output (such as changes due to temperature variations, loading, stress, cracking or electrical inputs) are sensed by sense elements


20


which provide an electrical feedback output to sense signal circuit


30


. This output is typically a voltage proportional to the displacement of the sense elements


20


and of the transducer


12


and transducer working area


102


.




The voltage output from the sense elements


20


is used by the drive circuitry


28


to provide power or frequency compensation to the drive signal to thereby obtain the desired mechanical displacement and resultant sonic output in the transducer


12


. Additionally, the voltage output from the sense elements


20


can be used to provide diagnostic or monitoring information regarding the operation and environment of transducer


12


and transducer working area


102


.




Circuits


28


and


30


can be implemented in analog or digital circuitry, or their combination, and used to provide continuous or discrete monitoring and adjustment of the drive output to maintain the desired mechanical displacement of the transducer


12


and resultant sonic output. In one preferred embodiment, a digital processor periodically monitors the output from the sense elements


20


to adjust the output from the drive circuit


28


on a substantially real time basis. In such an embodiment, software can be utilized to calibrate the transducer


12


for the use of similar or dissimilar materials between the various elements


18


and


20


.





FIG. 2

is a cross-sectional view showing another embodiment of transducer


12


having a single drive element


18


and a single sense element


20


in transducer body


16


. A drive electrode


40




a


is positioned in contact with drive element


18


and separated from a sense element electrode


40




b


by insulator


42


. Sense element electrode


40




b


electrically couples to sense element


20


. A common electrical connection is provided through electrode


40




c.







FIG. 3

is a side cross-sectional view of another embodiment of transducer


12


. The embodiment of

FIG. 3

is similar to the embodiment of

FIG. 2

except that an extra membrane ground electrode


46


is provided which couples to drive element


18


. Note that the embodiment shown in

FIGS. 2 and 3

do not include a fastener such as screw


26


shown in

FIG. 1

which is an optional component in all embodiments.





FIG. 4

shows another embodiment of transducer


12


. In the embodiment of

FIG. 4

, a ground electrode


50


has been added to provide electrical grounding to the structure. The embodiment of transducer


12


in

FIG. 5

is slightly different in that a drive electrode


52


A, drive return


52


B, sense electrode


52


C and sense return


52


D have been added to the structure to provide independent electrical coupling to drive element


18


and sense element


20


. Of course, these embodiments are simply shown to illustrate various aspects of the invention and the invention is not limited to any particular drive or sense element configuration. Additional sense elements can be connected in series or in parallel to increase the amplitude and/or frequency sensitivity of the sensor or to increase the output signal from the sense element. The sense elements may be interspersed or distributed among the various drive elements to provide distributed feedback indicative of operation of transducer


12


. The thickness of the sonic elements


20


may be less than, equal to or greater than the thickness of the drive elements.





FIGS. 6A

,


6


B and


6


C are top plan views showing three example embodiments for elements


18


and


20


. In

FIG. 6A

a piezoelectric element is shown as two halves


80




a


and


80




b.


In

FIG. 6B

, the element is shown in three sections,


82




a,




82




b


and


82




c.


In

FIG. 6C

an embodiment for an element is shown in which the element is provided in quarter sections


82




a,




82




b,




82




c


and


82




d.


In these embodiments, it is the electrode pattern on the element which is segmented to make contact at multiple locations. Of course, any configuration can be used with the present invention including a solid piece. Further, the elements do not require a disc shape as illustrated herein.




In one embodiment, the sense elements


20


and the drive elements


18


are of the same material whereby they experience the same changes due to environmental or other operational variations. The elements


18


and


20


can be of any appropriate material including crystals, plastics, ceramic or others. Such piezoelectric ceramics can be obtained from American Piezo Ceramics of Pennsylvania.





FIG. 7

is a graph of the tip amplitude (i.e., mechanical displacement) of an ultrasonic transducer of

FIG. 1

in μm versus the feedback voltage (rectified and scaled) output of sense element


20


measured in Volts.

FIG. 7

illustrates a highly linear relationship between the feedback voltage output from the sense elements and the tip amplitude. This linear relation provides for excellent control of the drive elements


18


to obtain a desired tip amplitude. Further, this relationship is substantially constant even after extended periods of use or over varying temperature ranges or other environmental factors which could effect the elements.

FIG. 8

is a graph of tip amplitude versus temperature for the transducer


12


of

FIG. 1

controlled in accordance with the present invention (plot


90


) and an uncontrolled sonic probe (plot


92


). As illustrated in

FIG. 8

, the output from the control probe is substantially constant over almost a 70° celsius change in temperature.





FIG. 9

is an exploded view showing transducer


12


from

FIG. 1

in greater detail.

FIG. 9

shows the positioning of contacts


22




a


-


22




f


relative to elements


18


and


20


. Additionally, in

FIG. 9

transducer body


16


forms a horn


100


for amplifying displacement into tip


102


. Tip


102


can then be applied to a work piece as desired. Screw


26


includes an insulating cover


104


to prevent electrical shorting of elements


18


and


20


and contacts


22




a


-


22




f.






Referring back to

FIG. 1

, another aspect of the present invention is illustrated. A variable resistance


110


is shown connected in series with the output from sense elements


20


. Variable resistance


110


can be adjusted or calibrated during manufacture such that it is properly matched with sense signal circuit


30


and drive circuit


28


to provide accurate control. This configuration allows a standardized sense signal


30


and drive circuit


28


to be used and individual transducers


12


to be calibrated by adjusting variable resistance


110


.




Table 1 shows a comparison of the initial measurements and measurements made after approximately 850,000 sonication cycles using three horns incorporating the sense element feedback of the invention to control the displacement of the tip of the horn of the transducer of FIG.


1


. The life cycling is done in air with no load presented to the horn tip.














TABLE 1













Horn #















SC5




SC1




SC6





















Displacement* 2/1/99




38




um




38




um




38




um






Displacement* 8/4/99




39




um




39




um




40




um






Feedback Sense Voltage Test 1




2.168




V




2.129




V




2.109




V






Feedback Sense Voltage Test 2




2.129




V




2.109




V




2.090




V











Note:










*The displacement measurement error is +/− 1 um













This data demonstrates that the feedback voltage remains stable and proportional to the displacement of the horn on three horns. As evidenced by above test results, in each series of tests, the system of the present invention provides independent feedback to monitor and control transducer operation.




Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The invention is not limited to the particular configurations set forth herein. Further, as used herein the term “sonic” includes acoustic, ultrasound and mechanical vibrations. In one embodiment, the present invention is used to produce ultrasonic energy. The invention can be used in any application where controlled sonic waves are desired.



Claims
  • 1. A device, comprising:a transducer body; a drive element coupled to the transducer to produce a sonic output in response to an electrical input; a sense element coupled to the transducer and coupled to the drive element, the sense element configured to provide an electrical feedback output related to the transducer output, the electrical feedback output adapted to control the electrical input to the drive element; and an electrical insulator which separates and electrically insulates the sense element from the drive element.
  • 2. The device of claim 1 wherein the drive element comprises a piezoelectric element.
  • 3. The device of claim 1 wherein the sense element comprises a piezoelectric element.
  • 4. The device of claim 1 wherein the drive element produces ultrasonic energy.
  • 5. The device of claim 1 including a first electrical contact electrically coupled to the drive element and a second electrical contact electrically coupled to the sense element, the first electrical contact adapted to receive the electrical input and the second electrical element adapted to provide the electrical feedback output.
  • 6. The device of claim 5 including a third electrical contact configured to provide an electrical ground.
  • 7. The device of claim 1 including an adjustable impedance connected in series with the electrical feedback output to calibrate for variations in the device.
  • 8. The device of claim 1 wherein the sense element and drive elements are disc shaped.
  • 9. The device of claim 8 wherein the drive element and sense element include holes extending therethrough.
  • 10. The device of claim 1 including a plurality of drive elements.
  • 11. The device of claim 1 including a plurality of sense elements.
  • 12. The device of claim 1 including a horn having a tip, the horn configured to direct displacement to the tip.
  • 13. The device of claim 1 wherein the electrical feedback output comprises a voltage signal.
  • 14. The device of claim 1 including an end cap and wherein the drive element and sense element are positioned between the transducer body and the end cap.
  • 15. The device of claim 14 wherein a clamping force is applied to the drive element and the sense element by the end cap and the transducer body.
  • 16. The device of claim 1, wherein the drive and sense elements are directly clamped to a working surface and wherein vibrations for the device is transformed to the working surface.
  • 17. The device of claim 1 wherein the sense element comprises a segmented disc.
  • 18. The device of claim 1 wherein the sense element has a thickness which is less than a thickness of the drive element.
  • 19. The device of claim 1 wherein the drive element comprises a segmented disc.
US Referenced Citations (44)
Number Name Date Kind
3736523 Puskas May 1973 A
3889166 Scurlock Jun 1975 A
4197478 Silvus, Jr. Apr 1980 A
4264838 Jacobson Apr 1981 A
4275388 Hornung Jun 1981 A
4378510 Bennett Mar 1983 A
4441044 Ruckenbauer et al. Apr 1984 A
4453141 Rosati Jun 1984 A
4479388 Matzuk Oct 1984 A
4491759 Kunz et al. Jan 1985 A
4506184 Siddall Mar 1985 A
4608865 Muller et al. Sep 1986 A
4728843 Mishiro Mar 1988 A
4739860 Kobayashi et al. Apr 1988 A
4893045 Honda Jan 1990 A
4979952 Kubota et al. Dec 1990 A
4982725 Hibino et al. Jan 1991 A
5099815 Yamauchi et al. Mar 1992 A
5176140 Kami et al. Jan 1993 A
5209119 Polla et al. May 1993 A
5216631 Sliwa, Jr. Jun 1993 A
5286452 Hansen Feb 1994 A
5336958 Saya et al. Aug 1994 A
5390678 Gesswein et al. Feb 1995 A
5447509 Mills et al. Sep 1995 A
5465109 Bowers Nov 1995 A
5515341 Toda et al. May 1996 A
5536963 Polla Jul 1996 A
5589401 Hansen et al. Dec 1996 A
5661361 Lysen Aug 1997 A
5671154 Iizuka et al. Sep 1997 A
5777230 Vandervalk Jul 1998 A
5808737 Edens et al. Sep 1998 A
5858648 Steel et al. Jan 1999 A
5865946 Råbe Feb 1999 A
5869762 Corsaro et al. Feb 1999 A
5869764 Schulte Feb 1999 A
5906580 Kline-Schoder et al. May 1999 A
5907521 Matsui et al. May 1999 A
5909279 Pepper et al. Jun 1999 A
5914507 Polla et al. Jun 1999 A
5924993 Hadjicostis et al. Jul 1999 A
6144140 Iino et al. Nov 2000 A
6191520 Maruyama et al. Feb 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (2)
Number Date Country
1 359 701 Jul 1974 GB
10-148533 Jun 1998 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (2)
Entry
“Copalis Technology”, by A. Bodner et al., Immunoassay Automation: An Updated Guide To Systems, pp. 253-275, (1996).
Pamphlet entitled “Patient-Centered Diagnostics™,Multiplex ™ Testing and Copalis™”, by DiaSorin Inc., Stillwater, Minnesota (1999).