The present invention relates to dry type air core reactors of the type used in utility and power applications and, more particularly, to mitigating audible sound produced by such reactors.
Air core reactors are inductive devices used in high voltage power transmission, distribution and industrial applications. Air core reactors are used for a variety of purposes, including for filtering out harmonics, as shunt devices which compensate for introduction of capacitive reactive power, and as devices which limit short circuit currents. Air core reactors are formed with a series of concentrically positioned, spaced-apart winding layers, referred to as packages, in a cylindrical configuration. The packages are positioned between upper and lower current carrying members, sometimes referred to as spider units or spiders. The spider units include a plurality of arms radiating along a plane and away from a central hub position in a star configuration. Among other functions, the spider units may serve as terminals for connecting power lines and for interconnecting the winding layers in an electrically parallel configuration. The reactors are normally installed with the spider units in a horizontal orientation with respect to an underlying horizontal ground plane so that the major axis of the cylindrical configuration extends vertically upward from the ground plane. For a single reactor, or for the lower-most reactor in a stacked configuration of two or more reactors, the winding layers are supported above the ground by the lower spider unit and a series of insulators and structural leg members which extend from the lower spider unit to the ground.
Because air core reactors carry alternating current through coiled electrical conductors, they are subjected to mechanical forces created by the interaction of the electrical current and the magnetic field generated by the reactor.
Air core reactors are often located in populous areas, and the sound created by the reactors can be a serious irritant to the local population. It is known to locate air core reactors behind walls to isolate them, or to construct a separate sound shield around each reactor to surround it with sound absorbing material. The cost of such structures is high, and they may inhibit physical access to the reactor for maintenance activities.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
While traditional solutions to mitigating the adverse effects of audible sound created by an air core reactor have focused on isolating the reactor from neighboring populations, the present inventors have innovatively looked to the source of the sound itself in order to reduce the amount of sound energy produced by the operation of the reactor. The inventors have recognized that prior art air core reactors have been designed on the basis of their electrical performance, but they are not optimized for their acoustic performance. The inventors have developed improvements in the design of such reactors in order to accomplish a reduction in the sound levels emanating from the device during power operation, thereby reducing or eliminating the need for supplemental sound barriers.
The packages 12a, 12b, 12c are separated from one another by a plurality of spacers 18 which are shown to have a vertical orientation extending in a direction parallel to the axis A. The spacers 18 are circumferentially spaced apart about the axis A to provide air gaps 20 between adjacent pairs of the packages 12a, 12b, 12c. In other embodiments (not illustrated), the reactor may include an outer sheathing or a rigid support structure to which an electrostatic shield may be attached. (See United States Patent Application Publication 2011/0043320 A1 which is incorporated herein by reference.) For such embodiments, further spacers may be provided to facilitate separation of the sheathing or the rigid support structure from the outermost package to also provide an air gap there between. Each air gap 20 permits a current of air to flow upward along a surface of the respective package.
The spider units 14, 16 each include a series of arms 24, 25 radiating along a plane and away from the axis A in a star configuration. The upper and lower spider units 14, 16 illustrated each have four spider arms 24, 25, although the number of arms in the spider units may range from fewer than four to more than twelve. Among other functions, the spider arms 24, 25 serve as line terminals (not illustrated) for effecting power connections to and between the packages 12 in an electrically parallel configuration. The spider arms 24, 25 extend outward from a central hub 26, 27. Each package 12 may include a plurality of layers of spirally wound electrical conductors (not illustrated), with each conductor connected between an arm 24 of the upper spider 14 and an arm 25 of the lower spider 16. For a single reactor, or for at least the lower-most reactor 10 when arranged in a stacked configuration of reactors, the packages 12 are supported above the ground by a combination of spider arms 25 of the lower unit 16 and a series of structural leg members 34. In the illustrated embodiment, all four of the arms 24 of the lower spider unit 16 are supported directly by leg members 34 which each extend from a spider arm 24 to the ground. The leg members 34 of the reactor 10 each include an electrical insulator 32. The number of structural leg members supporting the reactor 10 can vary from fewer than four to more than twelve.
Prior art air core reactors are designed to minimize electrical losses while staying within component manufacturing cost constraints, which in turn minimizes the amount of heat generated and the expense of operation of the device. For example, prior art reactors are configured such that the current passing through each package and each winding of each package is generally in-phase (i.e. ±10 degrees) with the current in other packages and windings at the grid power frequency. The inventors have discovered that such designs can be improved to reduce the amount of audible sound produced by the device while still satisfying overall design specification requirements for the device, including having an acceptable level of loss. Sound is produced by force acting on structures of the reactor resulting in those structures deflecting and creating sound waves in the surrounding air. The inventors have reduced sound by designing a change in a phase relationship of the force generated in at least one winding or package when compared to the phase of the force generated in other windings or packages. In embodiments of the invention, a current in at least one package is greater than 10 degrees out of phase with a current in other packages, or at least 20 degrees out of phase, or at least 45 degrees out of phase, or at least 90 degrees out of phase, or up to 180 degrees out of phase at the power frequency (typically 60 Hz or 50 Hz depending upon the country of use) or at all frequencies of 1 kHz or less. Note that audible sound issues are generally not of concern at current, frequencies higher than 1 kHz. By changing the current phase angles, the phase angles of resulting forces are changed accordingly such that the forces generated in the one package are a corresponding number of degrees out of phase with the forces in the other packages. The result is lower net forces acting on potential significant sound radiating surfaces and lower vibration and sound levels.
The out of phase current may be carried by all conductive winding layers in a particular package, or by only some of the conductive winding layers in a package.
It may be appreciated that the magnitude of the current carried by each conductor winding of a reactor is a design variable controlled by the designer. As such, it may be desired that the conductor winding carrying the out of phase current carry a lower current magnitude than other conductors in order to limit stresses imposed on the structure and to control losses during power operation. Thus, it will also be appreciated that the present invention has introduced sound production as a design element that can be balanced against other known design requirements, such as electrical losses, manufacturing and material cost, heat generation and dissipation, dimensions, mechanical stresses, etc. Moreover, in consideration of the mechanical response of the structure and the varying sensitivity of human ears over the frequency spectrum, embodiments of the invention may selectively mitigate sound production in particular frequency ranges, perhaps even at the cost of increasing sound production in other frequency ranges.
The desired out of phase current/force may be accomplished by changing a direction of a spiral in the conductor windings to be opposite (e.g. counter clockwise) from a direction of a spiral of the other conductor windings (e.g. clockwise) in an embodiment. It may be particularly advantageous for the out of phase current to occur in the outermost and/or innermost package. In one embodiment, at least one conductor winding carries no current.
The magnetic field generated during operation of an air core reactor is a function of the current distribution within the reactor. The inventors have realized that it is possible to control the current distribution to advantageously shape the magnetic field such that it flows in one direction through the bulk of the reactor but in an opposite direction through the outermost package(s). In this manner, a sound generating force is produced in the outermost package that is out of phase with the sound generating force produced in the bulk of the reactor by currents that are flowing in the same direction through all of the packages. When the force induced in one winding or package is out of phase (including being in an opposite direction) to that induced in another winding or package, a sound canceling effect is achieved. This concept is illustrated in
Advantageously, some of the modifications discussed above also function to increase the mass or stiffness of at least some of the packages, for example the innermost and/or outermost packages. For any given driving force, a higher mass and/or a higher stiffness will result in a lower total displacement of the packages. Since the sound energy of concern is generated by the radial movement of the sides of the packages, particularly the innermost and outermost packages, any modification that increases the mass or the stiffness of a package will affect the level of sound produced. An increase in mass will generally lower the natural frequency of the package, while an increase in stiffness will generally raise the natural frequency of the package. Thus, these variables can be used by the designer to tailor the mechanical response of the reactor and to thereby affect its sound production.
As illustrated in
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be apparent that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous other variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention concepts disclosed herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the claims which now follow.
This application claims benefit of the 9 Jul. 2012 filing date of U.S. provisional patent application No. 61/669,317.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2013/050529 | 7/9/2013 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61669317 | Jul 2012 | US |