The following copending and commonly assigned U.S. patent applications were filed on the same day as U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/210,155. All of these applications relate to and further describe other aspects of this application and are incorporated by reference in their entirety.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/208,918, entitled “Sound Processing System with Degraded Signal Optimization, filed on Jul. 31, 2002.
U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/208,930, entitled “Sound Processing System Using Distortion Limiting Techniques”, filed on Jul. 31, 2002.
1. Technical Field
The invention generally relates to sound processing systems. More particularly, the invention relates to sound processing systems having multiple outputs.
2. Related Art
Audio or sound system designs involve the consideration of many different factors. The position and number of speakers, the frequency response of each speaker, and other factors usually are considered in the design. Some factors may be more pronounced in the design than others in various applications such as a vehicle. For example, the desired frequency response of a speaker located on an instrument panel in a vehicle usually is different from the desired frequency response of a speaker located in the lower portion of a rear door panel. Other factors also may be more pronounced.
Consumer expectations of sound quality are increasing. In some applications, such as a vehicle, consumer expectations of sound quality have increased dramatically over the last decade. Consumers now expect high quality sound systems in their vehicles. In addition, the number of potential audio sources has increased. Audio is available from sources such as radio, compact disc (CD), digital video disc (DVD), super audio compact disc (SACD), tape players, and the like. Furthermore, when a vehicle travels, the signal strength and character of received broadcasts, such as FM radio, vary significantly. As the vehicle changes position with respect to the transmitter, strong stereo signals, weak mono signals, and a continuum of signals with strengths and characters in between may be received. Moreover, many vehicle audio systems employ advanced signal processing techniques to customize the listening environment. Some vehicle audio systems incorporate audio or sound processing that is similar to surround sound systems offered in home theater systems.
Many digital sound processing formats support direct encoding and playback of five or more discrete channels. However, most recorded material is provided in traditional two-channel stereo mode. Matrix sound processors synthesize four or more output signals from a pair of input signals—generally left and right. Many systems have five channels—center, left-front, right-front, left-surround, and right-surround. Some systems have seven or more channels—center, left-front, right-side, left-side, right-side, left-rear, and right-rear. Other outputs such as a separate subwoofer channel may be included.
In general, matrix decoders mathematically describe or represent various combinations of input audio signals in a N×2 or other matrix, where N is the number of desired outputs. The matrix usually includes 2N matrix coefficients that define the proportion of the left and/or right input audio signals for a particular output signal. Typically, these surround sound processors can transform M input channels into N output channels using a M×N matrix of coefficients.
Many audio environments, such as the listening environment inside a vehicle, are significantly different from a home theater environment. Most home theater systems are not designed to operate with the added complexities inside of a vehicle. The complexities include non-optimal driver placement, varying background noise, and varying signal characteristics. A vehicle and similar environments are typically more confined than rooms containing home theatre systems. The speakers in a vehicle usually are in closer proximity to the listener. Typically, there is less control over speaker placement in relation to the listener as compared to a home theater or similar environment, where it is relatively easy to place each speaker the same approximate distance from the listeners.
In contrast, it is nearly impossible in a vehicle to place each speaker the same distance from the listeners when one considers the front and rear seating positions and their close proximity to the doors, as well as the kick-panels, dash, pillars, and other interior vehicle surfaces that could contain the speakers. These placement restrictions are problematic considering the short distances available in an automobile for sound to disperse before reaching the listeners. In many applications within a vehicle, noise is a significant variable. Ambient noise in home theatre systems usually remains relatively constant. However, ambient noise levels in a vehicle can change with speed and road conditions. In addition to noise, the received signal strength, such as of an FM broadcast, varies more as an automobile changes location with respect to the transmission source than in the home environment where the receiver is stationary.
This invention provides a sound processing system with spatial imaging techniques to reduce the times when only a center speaker would be heard and to reduce the locations where a center speaker would not be heard.
The sound processing system adjusts the gain of the volume setting for individual speakers or sets of speakers in response to one or more input signals, such as the volume setting and the vehicle speed. When the global volume setting is low or the vehicle speed increases, the sound processing system attenuates the gain of the volume setting for the center speaker. In addition or as an alternative, the sound processing system increases the gain of the volume setting for the front and/or rear speakers. The rear speakers may include one or more pairs of rear and/or surround speakers.
The sound processing system also creates a virtual center channel for locations where the center speaker may not be heard. These locations include the rear seats in a vehicle, where the front seats block or otherwise obstruct sound from the center speaker. The sound processing system mixes an input signal for a rear speaker with an input signal for a front speaker and/or an input signal for the center speaker. An all-pass network may be used to further position the virtual center channel.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be, or will become, apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within the description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the following claims.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following drawings and description. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like references numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
The audio system 102 improves the spatial characteristics of surround sound systems. The audio system 102 supports the use of a variety of audio components such as radios, CDs, DVDs, their derivatives, and the like. The audio system 102 may use 2-channel source material such as direct left and right, 5.1 channel, 6.2 channel, other source materials from a matrix decoder, digitally encoded/decoded discrete source material, and the like. The amplitude and phase characteristics of the source material and the reproduction of specific sound field characteristics in the listening environment both play a key role in the successful reproduction of a surround sound field. The audio system 102 improves the reproduction of a surround sound field by controlling the amplitude, phase, and mixing ratios between discrete and passive decoder surround signals and/or the direct two-channel output signals. The amplitude, phase, and mixing ratios are controlled between the discrete and passive decoder output signals. The spatial sound field reproduction is improved for all seating locations by re-orientation of the direct, passive, and active mixing and steering parameters, especially in a vehicle environment. The mixing and steering ratios as well as spectral characteristics may be adaptively modified as a function of the noise and other environmental factors. In a vehicle, information from the data bus, microphones, and other transduction devices may be used to control the mixing and steering parameters.
The vehicle 100 has a front center speaker (CTR speaker) 124, a left front speaker (LF speaker) 113, a right front speaker (RF speaker) 115, and at least one pair of surround speakers. The surround speakers can be a left side speaker (LS speaker) 117 and a right side speaker (RS speaker) 119, a left rear speaker (LR speaker) 129 and a right rear speaker (RR speaker) 130, or a combination of speaker sets. Other speaker sets may be used. While not shown, one or more dedicated subwoofer or other drivers may be present. Possible subwoofer mounting locations include the trunk 105, below a seat (not shown), or the rear shelf 108. The vehicle 100 also has one or more microphones 150 mounted in the interior.
Each CTR speaker, LF speaker, RF speaker, LS speaker, RS speaker, LR speaker, and RR speaker may include one or more speaker drivers such as a tweeter and a woofer. The tweeter and woofer may be mounted adjacent to each other in essentially the same location or in different locations. LF speaker 113 may include a tweeter located in door 104-1 or elsewhere at a height roughly equivalent to a side mirror or higher and may include a woofer located in door 104-1 beneath the tweeter. The LF speaker 113 may have other arrangements of the tweeter and woofer. The CTR speaker 124 is mounted in the front dashboard 107, but could be mounted in the roof, on or near the rear-view mirror, or elsewhere in the vehicle 100.
In operation, the primary source head-unit 212 generates a left channel 214 and a right channel 218. The left and right channels may be processed similarly or differently. If the audio signals on the left channel 214 and right channel 218 are digital, the audio signals pass directly to pre-filter 236, decoder 228, or crossbar matrix mixers 226. If the audio signals on left channel 214 and right channel 218 are analog, the audio signals pass through one or more analog to digital converters (ADC) 220-1 and 220-2, and then pass to pre-filter 236, decoder 228, or crossbar matrix mixer 226. The pre-filter 236 includes one or more filters (not shown) that may provide conventional filter functions such as allpass (crossover), lowpass, highpass, bandpass, peak or notch, treble shelving, base shelving and/or other audio filter functions. In one aspect, left channel 214 and right channel 218 are input directly into crossbar matrix mixer 226. In another aspect, the left channel 214 and right channel 218 are input to decoder 228. In a further aspect, the left channel 214 and right channel 218 are input to pre-filter 236. Similarly, an optional secondary source 216 provides source signals from navigation unit 234 and cellular phone 242 to analog to digital converters (ADC) 220-3 and 220-4, respectively. These digital source signals are input into crossbar matrix mixer 226 or pre-filter 236.
From the primary-source digital inputs, such as direct from ADC 220-1 and ADC 220-2 or indirect from pre-filter 236, the decoder 228 generates multiple decoded signals that are output to crossbar matrix mixer 226. In one aspect, there are five decoded signals. In another aspect, there are seven decoded signals. There may be other multiples of decoded signals including those for a subwoofer. The decoder 228 may decode inherently digital inputs, such as DOLBY DIGITAL AC3® or DTS® signals, into multi-channel outputs. The decoder 228 may decode encoded 2-channel inputs, such as Dolby Pro Logic I®, Dolby Pro Logic II®, or DTS Neos 6® signals, into multi-channel outputs. The decoder 228 may apply other decoding methods, such as active matrix, to generate multi-channel outputs. Inherently digital inputs can result in 5.1 output—LF (left-front), CTR (center), RF (right-front), LR (left-rear), RR (right-rear), and LFE (low frequency). Inherently digital inputs also can result in 6.2 outputs—LF, CTR, RF, LS (left-side), RS (right-side), LR, RR, left LFE, and right LFE. Inherently digital inputs can result in other outputs. Similarly, an active matrix processed 2-channel input can result in 4.0 output—LF, CTR, RF, and S (surround)). The channels output by these types of decoders are referred to as discrete. Other multi-channel outputs may result.
In addition to the audio and secondary source signals, the outputs from decoder 228 can be input to crossbar matrix mixer 226. The crossbar matrix mixer 226 outputs two or more summed signals 258. In one aspect, there are four or more output signals 258. There may be other multiples of output signals. The crossbar matrix mixer 226 may include individual channel inputs and may include virtual channel processing. The virtual channels may be further utilized to process any signal presented in the crossbar matrix for various complex sound effects.
Mixed output signals 258 from crossbar matrix mixer 226 are input to post-filter 260, which includes one or more digital filters (not shown) that provide conventional filter functions such as allpass, lowpass, highpass, bandpass, peak or notch, treble shelving, base shelving, other audio filter functions, or a combination. The filtration performed by post-filter 260 is in response to input signal 261, which may include: vehicle operation parameters such as a vehicle speed and engine revolutions-per-minute (RPM); sound settings such as tone level, bass level, treble level, and global volume from the head unit 212; input sound pressure level (SPL) from interior microphones 150-1, 150-2, and/or 150-3 (see
An output 262 of filter 260 is connected to a volume gain 264. Volume gain 264 applies global volume attenuation to all signals output or localized volume attenuation to specific channels. The gain of volume gain block 264 is determined by vehicle input signals 266, which are indicative of vehicle operation parameters. In one aspect, vehicle input signals 266 include vehicle speed provided by a vehicle data bus (not shown). In another aspect, vehicle input signals 266 include vehicle state signals such as convertible top up, convertible top down, vehicle started, vehicle stopped, windows up, windows down, ambient vehicle noise (SPL) from interior microphone 150-1 placed near the listening position, door noise (SPL) from door microphone 150-2 placed in the interior of a door, and the like. Other input signals such as fade, balance, and global volume from the head unit 212, the navigation unit 234, the cellular phone 242, or a combination may be used.
An output 268 of volume gain 264 is input to a delay 270. An output 272 of delay is input to a limiter 274. An output 276 of the limiter 274 is input to a digital to analog (DAC) converter 278. The limiter 274 may employ clip detection 280. An output 282 of the DAC 278 is input to an amplifier 284. An output 286 of the amplifier 284 is input to one or more speakers 288.
While operating in the digital domain, the sound processing system 202 can decode digitally encoded material (DOLBY DIGITAL AC3®, DTS®, and the like) or originally analog material, such as monaural, stereo, or encoded tracks that are converted into the digital domain. To decode these analog signals, the decoder can employ one or more active matrix decoding techniques, including DOLBY PRO LOGIC® or LOGIC 7®, and various environment effects, including hall, club, theater, etc. For active matrix decoding, the decoder converts the left and right channel inputs to center, left, right, and surround channel outputs. Optionally, the decoder can output a low-frequency channel, which is routed to a subwoofer.
Active matrix decoding applies digital processing techniques to significantly increase the separation between the center, left, right, and surround channels by manipulating the input signals. In one aspect, active matrix channel separation is about 30 db between all four channels. Active matrix processing can be employed where coefficients change with time, source, or any other parameter. Virtual center channels can be synthesized from left and right speakers.
Passive matrix processing uses a resistive network to manipulate analog input signals. Passive matrix processing also may be achieved in the digital domain from digitized input. Passive matrix processing may be implemented in the crossbar matrix mixer 226 or elsewhere in the sound processing system. Passive matrix processing may be used without active matrix processing, as in systems without a surround sound decoder, or in combination with a surround sound decoder. In one aspect, the user selects between active decoding or passive processing. In another aspect, the processing system selects the type of processing based on the audio signals.
In addition to its use in an automobile, passive matrix processing of a digitized signal is beneficial in home and automobile environments and especially for degraded signals as described below. Unlike active matrix processing, which can achieve 30 db of separation between the channels, passive matrix processing generally has >40 db of separation between the left and right and center and surround channels, but only about 3 db of separation between adjacent channels, such as the left/right and center, and left/right and surround. In this respect, active matrix processing achieves about an order of magnitude greater separation than passive matrix. Unlike an active matrix system which will route monaural signals only through the center channel, passive matrix processing results in all speakers passing the audio signal. Thus, passive matrix processing may be used to reduce slamming and other undesirable effects of stereo to mono blending for sources including amplitude modulation (AM) radio, frequency modulation (FM) radio, CD, and cassette tapes.
To accomplish passive matrix processing in the digital domain, the crossbar matrix mixer 226 mixes N output channels from the left and right audio input channels 214 and 218. The passive matrix includes matrix coefficients that do not change over time. In one aspect, N is equal to five or seven. When N is equal to five, the vehicle sound system preferably includes left front (LF), right front (RF), right side (RS) or right rear (RR), left side (LS) or left rear (LR) and center (CTR) speakers. When N is equal to seven, the vehicle sound system has both side and rear speaker pairs.
To increase the tonal qualities of reproduced sound, whether from a surround sound processor or otherwise, distortion limiting filters may be used. Sound processing system 202 may incorporate one or more distortion limiting filters in the pre-filter 236 or post-filter 260. In one aspect, these filters are set based on vehicle state information and user settings in addition or in-lieu of the properties of the audio signal itself.
At elevated listening levels, sound distortion increases. This increase may be in response to the applied filter gain (loudness compensation) or other sources, such as amplifier clipping or speaker distortion. By applying filter attenuation at a predetermined or high volume level, sound quality may be increased. A predetermined volume level can be a global volume setting preset by the manufacturer or selected by a user of the sound processing system. The predetermined volume level also can be a sound pressure level as discussed. A higher or elevated volume level is when the global volume setting exceeds a high volume threshold. This attenuation may be applied to signals with previously applied filter gain or the “raw” signal. Attenuation may be accomplished by coupling the treble shelf, base shelf, or notch filter (or any combination of these filter functions or others) to the global volume position, and engaging the attenuation filters as desired.
In a similar fashion, sound quality may also be improved at predetermined or elevated listening levels by tone filter attenuation. This attenuation may be applied to previously tone compensated signal or the “raw” signal. Tone filter attenuation may be incorporated into filter block 236 or 260. The attenuation may be accomplished by coupling one or multiple filters (treble shelf, base shelf, notch, or others) to the bass, treble, or midrange tone controls, and engaging the attenuation filters as desired.
While these attenuations can be made solely on the basis of the position of the global volume and/or and tone controls, attenuation may also be applied by dynamically compensating the amount of attenuation through the use of SPL information provided by an in-car microphone, such as the interior microphone 150-1 (see
In another aspect, the crossbar matrix mixer 226 performs adaptive mixing to alter the inter-channel mixing ratios, steering angles, and filter parameters between the discrete channel outputs from decoder 228 to improve spatial balance and reduce steering artifacts. Spatial balance can be thought of as the evenness of the soundstage created and the ability to locate specific sounds in the soundstage. Steering artifacts may be thought of as audible discontinuities in the soundstage, such as when you hear a portion of the signal from one speaker location and then hear it shift to another speaker location. Also, if the steering angles are overly aggressive, you can hear over-steering, or “pumping,” which changes the volume of the signal. The mixer can mix direct, decoded, or passively processed signals with discrete, non-steered, or partially-steered signals to improve the spatial balance of the sound heard at each passenger location. This improvement can be applied to music signals, video signals, and the like.
In a similar fashion, front and rear channel volume compensators 346 and 348 (see
The sound processing system 502 receives left and right channel signals 514 and 518 from a head unit or other source (not shown). The left and right channel signals 514 and 518 are input to analog to digital converters (ADC) 520-1 and 520-2. Outputs of ADC's 520-1 and 520-2 are input to decoder 528. Outputs of the decoder 528 are input to a crossbar matrix mixer 526. The crossbar matrix mixer 526 generates LF, RF, LS/LR, RS/RR, and CTR output signals. The signals that are sent to door-mounted speakers are adjusted to account for changes in the SPL. The door-mounted speakers may be the LF and RF only, the LS and RS only, or the LF, RF, LS, and RS, or another combination of speakers. In one aspect, the LF and RF speakers may be in the doors and the LR and RR are in the rear deck. In another aspect, the LF and RF speakers may be in the kick panels, and the LS, RS, LR and RR speakers are door-mounted. In a further aspect, the LF, RF, LR, and RR speakers are all in the doors. The CTR speaker is not door-mounted. In yet a further aspect, a single surround speaker is mounted in the rear shelf 108 (see
The outputs of the crossbar matrix mixer 526 that are associated with door-mounted speakers are output to a door-mounted speaker compensator 531. The door-mounted compensator 531 also receives vehicle status input 566, which may be received from a vehicle data bus or any other source. The vehicle status input 566 may be the vehicle speed, the door noise, and the like. By providing additional gain as a function of vehicle speed to the door-mounted speakers, audio quality is improved. In one aspect, the compensator 531 may receive a SPL signal in real-time from a microphone 150-2 mounted in the interior of a door or microphone 150-1 mounted in the interior of the vehicle. In this manner, volume correction may be applied as a function of vehicle speed and door SPL levels, or SPL level alone.
In
In
In
Referring to
The RS and LS outputs pass through an allpass network 825. Due to space requirements in a vehicle, the size (diameter and depth) of the CTR speaker may be restricted in comparison to the front and rear door speaker locations. With a smaller size, the CTR channel speaker is not capable of reproducing the lower frequencies as well as the larger door speakers. The resulting effect of this restriction causes a “spatial blurring” of the CTR speaker sound image as the CTR signal transcends from high to low frequencies or vice-a-versa. By processing either a portion (as defined by frequency bandwidth and or mixing level) or all of the LF and RF signals through an allpass network, the CTR channel's lower frequencies are perceived as emanating from the smaller CTR speaker. The imaging and stability of the center channel lower frequencies are improved.
Traditional surround sound processors produce low quality sound from mono and mixed mono-stereo signals. As the system switches between stereo and mono reception due to degraded signal strength, the decoders create a “slamming” effect between the center and other channels. Slamming occurs when the stereo signal, which is being sent to all the speakers, degrades to a monaural signal, and is only sent to the center speaker. The listener perceives the sound to rapidly transition, or slam, from throughout the vehicle to only the front-center of the vehicle, and back to throughout the vehicle, as the signal switches from stereo, to mono, and back to stereo.
To establish a coherence value using the coherence estimator, the left and right channel inputs are band-limited 1255. A value of 0 is assigned to a pure stereo signal (no signal overlap between channels) and a value of 1 is assigned to a pure monaural signal (complete overlap between channels). Values between 0 and 1 are assigned to mixed monaural/stereo signals in direct proportion to their stereo versus monaural character. The coherence C is calculated 1256. Estimates of steering angles for the left channel output verses the right channel output and for the center channel output verses the surround channel output are determined 1257. The center verses surround and the left verses right steering angles are limited 1259 as a function of the calculated coherence value C.
By continually limiting the steering angle as a function of the stereo/mono character of the received signal, the system transitions between full active steering verses limited steering angle processing. Through continuous updating of the coherence value, steering angles are continually optimized for the available received signal. By smoothing the steering angle transitions, slamming is reduced.
In one aspect, the coherence value C is defined as follows:
C=P2LR/PLL*PRR=coherence, where:
PLL=power of left input signal;
PRR=power of right input signal; and
PLR=cross-power of left and right input signals.
Thus, when C=1.0, the source is pure monaural, and when C=0.0, the source is pure stereo.
When the low-frequency bass content of signals, even those that are otherwise purely stereo, contains an overlap in the bass frequencies due to the non-directional character of base frequencies, the coherence estimator first band-limits the left and right input signals before calculating the coherence value. In this fashion, the coherence estimate is not skewed by music with large bass content.
The active matrix decoder may be designed so that when center signal/surround signal=left signal/right signal=0, the matrix from the decoder collapses to:
LFout=Lin, RFout=Fin, LSout=Lin,
RSout=Rin, CTRout=0.707(Lin+Rin);
which is a stereo, non-surround matrix.
Thus, the degree of surround sound enhancement or steering is made a function of the coherence value, where:
CTR/S angle=f(CTR/Smeasured, C),
L/R angle=f(L/Rmeasured, C), and
S is the surround signal.
In one aspect, this function may be implemented as follows:
YCTR/S=(1−alpha)XCTR/S+(alpha)Xstereo if C>stereo threshold; and
YCTR/S=(1−alpha)XCTR/S+(alpha)Xmonaural if otherwise; where
YCTR/S=CTR/S angle passed to decoder for processing,
XCTR/S=“raw” CTR/S angle measurement,
C=coherence (1.0=mono, 0.0=stereo),
Alpha=a scale factor that is much less than 1.0, such as 0.02 to 0.0001,
Xstereo=CTR/S stereo steering limit, and
Xmonaural=CTR/S monaural steering limit.
In the monaural spatializer, a synthetic surround (ambiance) signal Sf is continuously formed 1363. In one aspect, Sf can be derived by band-limiting the Lraw and Rraw input signals to about 7 kHz and above, summing these L and R band-limited signals, and dividing this sum by two. In another aspect the input signals are first summed and divided prior to band-limiting. A coherence estimate value (C) may be continuously calculated 1365 for the L and R input signals as described above. The raw input signals (Lraw and Rraw) are continuously modified 1367 in response to the raw input signals and a weighted sum of the Sf signal formation 1363 and the coherence calculation 1365 to generate virtual stereo signals Lt and Rt. The virtual stereo signals Lt and Rt are output 1369 to an active decoder for surround sound processing.
The monaural spatializer may be designed so that from a pure, or nearly pure monaural signal, virtual stereo signals are generated that can produce LF and RF signals that are from about 3 to about 6 db down from the CTR signal, and a surround signal that is about 6 db down from the CTR signal. The virtual stereo signals Lt and Rt may be input to an active decoder. Lt and Rt may be derived from monaural or nearly monaural Lraw and Rraw signals that are band-limited to about 7 kHz thus generating Lbl and Rbl. The derivation Lt and Rt is as follows:
Sf=(Lbl+Rbl)/2;
Lt=(X*Lraw)+(Y*Sf*C);
Rt=(X*Rraw)+(Y*Sf*C);
where Sf is the synthetic surround signal,
Lbl and Rbl are the band-limited raw input signals,
C is the coherence value between 0.0 and 1.0 as described above,
X is 1.707 or a different weighting factor, and
Y is 0.7 or a different weighting factor.
The weighting factors X and Y may be varied depending on the surround sound effects desired. Thus, if the coherence estimator determines a signal to be purely or nearly pure monaural in character, surround information is added to the signal prior to active decoding. However, as C approaches 0 (pure stereo), the amount of synthetic surround is reduced, thus eliminating virtual stereo in favor of true stereo as the stereo character of the signal increases. Thus, through the combination of the coherence estimator, the monaural spatializer, and active decoding, the sound quality of various monaural and degraded stereo signals may be improved. In addition or in lieu of a coherence estimator, a received signal strength estimator may also be used to alter the degree or steering of active matrix processing.
The sound processing systems are advantageous for automotive sound systems. However, in many instances, they may be beneficially used in a home theater environment. These systems also may be implemented in the vehicle through the addition of add-on devices or may be incorporated into vehicles with the requisite processing capabilities already present.
Many of the processing methods described can be performed in the digital or analog domains. A single digital processing system of sufficient functionality can implement the disclosed embodiments, thus eliminating the requirement for multiple analog and/or digital processors. Such a digital processor can optionally transform any appropriate digital feed, such as from a compact disc, DVD, SACD, or satellite radio. Alternatively, the digital processor can incorporate an analog to digital converter to process an analog signal, such as a signal previously converted from digital to analog, an AM or FM radio signal, or a signal from an inherently analog device, such as a cassette player.
The sound processing systems can process 2-channel source material, and may also process other multiple channels such as, 5.1 and 6.2 multi-channel signals if an appropriate decoder is used. The system can improve the spatial characteristics of surround sound systems from multiple sources.
In addition to digital and analog primary source music signals, the sound processing systems can process sound-inputs from any additional secondary source, such as cell phones, radar detectors, scanners, citizens band (CB) radios, and navigation systems. The digital primary source music signals include DOLBY DIGITAL AC3®, DTS®, and the like. The analog primary source music signals include monaural, stereo, encoded, and the like. The secondary source signals may be processed along with the music signals to enable gradual switching between primary and secondary source signals. This is advantageous when one is driving a vehicle and desires music to fade into the background as a call is answered or as a right turn instruction is received from the navigation system.
While many factors may be considered, two factors that play a role in the successful reproduction of a surround sound field in an automobile are amplitude and the phase characteristics of the source material. The sound processing systems include methods to improve the reproduction of a surround sound field by controlling the amplitude, phase, and mixing ratios of the music signals as they are processed from the head-unit outputs to the amplifier inputs. These systems can deliver an improved spatial sound field reproduction for all seating locations by re-orientation of the direct, passive, or active mixing and steering parameters according to occupant location. The mixing and steering parameters according to occupant location. The mixing and steering ratios, as well as spectral characteristics, may also be modified as a function of vehicle speed and/or noise in an adaptive nature.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that more embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of the invention.
This application is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/210,155, entitled “Sound Processing System Using Spatial Imaging Techniques” and filed on Jul. 31, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 7,206,413, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/850,500, entitled “Data-Driven Software Architecture for Digital Sound Processing and Equalization,” filed on May 7, 2001 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,804,565, incorporated by reference in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3845572 | McCanney | Nov 1974 | A |
4251688 | Furner | Feb 1981 | A |
4382158 | Ohshita et al. | May 1983 | A |
4641344 | Kasai et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4759066 | Polk et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4761814 | Sgai et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4799260 | Mandell et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4837825 | Shivers | Jun 1989 | A |
4862502 | Griesinger | Aug 1989 | A |
4866776 | Kasai et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4882753 | Shivers | Nov 1989 | A |
4891839 | Scheiber | Jan 1990 | A |
4905283 | Ishikawa et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4932059 | Fosgate | Jun 1990 | A |
4940977 | Mandell | Jul 1990 | A |
4941177 | Mandell et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4953213 | Tasaki et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
4972482 | Ishiguro et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5046098 | Mandell et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5068897 | Yamato et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
5109416 | Croft | Apr 1992 | A |
5109419 | Griesinger | Apr 1992 | A |
5119422 | Price | Jun 1992 | A |
5136650 | Griesinger | Aug 1992 | A |
5146507 | Satoh et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5161197 | Griesinger | Nov 1992 | A |
5172415 | Fosgate | Dec 1992 | A |
5189703 | Holman | Feb 1993 | A |
5193118 | Latham-Brown et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5199075 | Fosgate | Mar 1993 | A |
5222143 | Min | Jun 1993 | A |
5263087 | Fosgate | Nov 1993 | A |
5274740 | Davis et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5280528 | Fosgate | Jan 1994 | A |
5295189 | Fosgate | Mar 1994 | A |
5301237 | Fosgate | Apr 1994 | A |
5307415 | Fosgate | Apr 1994 | A |
5319713 | Waller, Jr. et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5333201 | Waller, Jr. | Jul 1994 | A |
5337196 | Kim | Aug 1994 | A |
5339363 | Fosgate | Aug 1994 | A |
5386473 | Harrison | Jan 1995 | A |
5400433 | Davis et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5412732 | Kanishi et al. | May 1995 | A |
5428687 | Willcocks et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5463424 | Dressler | Oct 1995 | A |
5467399 | Whitecar | Nov 1995 | A |
5497425 | Rapoport | Mar 1996 | A |
5504819 | Fosgate | Apr 1996 | A |
5524054 | Spille | Jun 1996 | A |
5533129 | Gefvert | Jul 1996 | A |
5557680 | Janes | Sep 1996 | A |
5581621 | Koyama et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583962 | Davis et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594800 | Gerzon | Jan 1997 | A |
5610985 | Ten Kate | Mar 1997 | A |
5617480 | Ballard et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625696 | Fosgate | Apr 1997 | A |
5638452 | Waller, Jr. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642423 | Embree | Jun 1997 | A |
5644640 | Fosgate | Jul 1997 | A |
5666424 | Fosgate et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5680468 | Van Hout et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684879 | Verdick | Nov 1997 | A |
5708719 | Greenberger et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5727067 | Iwamatsu | Mar 1998 | A |
5727068 | Karagosian et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5748746 | Ozaki et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757928 | Schaar | May 1998 | A |
5761313 | Schott | Jun 1998 | A |
5764777 | Goldfarb | Jun 1998 | A |
5768394 | Heo | Jun 1998 | A |
5771295 | Waller, Jr. | Jun 1998 | A |
5796844 | Griesinger | Aug 1998 | A |
5798818 | Derderian et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5802181 | Ozaki et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809150 | Eberbach | Sep 1998 | A |
5841993 | Ho | Nov 1998 | A |
5850455 | Arnold et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850457 | Gefvert | Dec 1998 | A |
5862228 | Davis | Jan 1999 | A |
5870480 | Griesinger | Feb 1999 | A |
5883961 | House et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5887071 | House | Mar 1999 | A |
5930370 | Ruzicka | Jul 1999 | A |
5974380 | Smyth et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5983087 | Milne et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6032081 | Han et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6038324 | Ambourn | Mar 2000 | A |
6038330 | Meucci, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6075868 | Goldfarb et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6108584 | Edwards | Aug 2000 | A |
6118876 | Ruzicka | Sep 2000 | A |
6122381 | Winterer | Sep 2000 | A |
6141597 | Botzko et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6144747 | Scofield et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6150597 | Kakishita et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154549 | Arnold et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157725 | Becker | Dec 2000 | A |
6195435 | Kitamura | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198826 | Cowieson et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6332026 | Kuusama et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6363155 | Horbach | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6381335 | Juszkiewicz et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6442277 | Lueck et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6442278 | Vaudrey et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449368 | Davis et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453047 | Dicker et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6466913 | Yasuda et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470087 | Heo et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496584 | Irwan et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6498856 | Itabashi et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501717 | Yamazaki | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501843 | Usui et al. | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6539357 | Sinha | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6556685 | Urry et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6577736 | Clemow | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584202 | Montag et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6587565 | Choi | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6590983 | Kraemer | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6611212 | Craven et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6624873 | Callahan, Jr. et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636608 | Kishii et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6639989 | Zacharov et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6650755 | Vaudrey et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6683962 | Griesinger | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6694027 | Schneider | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697491 | Griesinger | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6704421 | Kitamura | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6711266 | Aylward | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6760448 | Gundry | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6798889 | Dicker et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6804565 | Eid | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6816597 | Kawano | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829576 | Tsai et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6850622 | Maejima | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6853732 | Scofield | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6928168 | Kirkeby | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6991289 | House | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6996239 | Wood | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7003119 | Arthur | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7031905 | Tanaka et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7065217 | Gierl et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7107211 | Griesinger | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7177432 | Eid et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7206413 | Eid et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7415120 | Vaudrey et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7447321 | Furge et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7451006 | Eid et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7760890 | Furge et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
20020055796 | Katayama et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020154783 | Fincham | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030040822 | Eid et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030206639 | Griesinger | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040005064 | Griesinger | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040005065 | Griesinger | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040022392 | Griesinger | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040086130 | Eid et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040179697 | Griesinger | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040228497 | Chen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040258259 | Koyama | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050018860 | Furge et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050031128 | Tomita et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031129 | Devantier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031130 | Devantier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031135 | Devantier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050031143 | Devantier et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050063551 | Cheng et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050100178 | Rybicki et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20060088175 | Eid et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20080317257 | Furge et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319564 | Furge et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090220112 | Fincham | Sep 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 067 680 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 387 601 | Feb 2004 | EP |
1 387 601 | Apr 2004 | EP |
60-145714 | Aug 1985 | JP |
63-114599 | May 1988 | JP |
63-177699 | Jul 1988 | JP |
01-144900 | Jul 1989 | JP |
04-035499 | Jun 1992 | JP |
05-038000 | Feb 1993 | JP |
06-500898 | Jan 1994 | JP |
6-311581 | Apr 1994 | JP |
6-311589 | Apr 1994 | JP |
08-213861 | Aug 1996 | JP |
09-062271 | Mar 1997 | JP |
10-011078 | Jan 1998 | JP |
2002-118897 | Apr 2002 | JP |
2002-151975 | May 2002 | JP |
2002199487 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2003-299181 | Oct 2003 | JP |
WO 0047018 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 02091798 | Nov 2002 | WO |
WO 02091798 | Nov 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060088175 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10210155 | Jul 2002 | US |
Child | 11299592 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09850500 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 10210155 | US |