A first known issue in playing songs, whether from a radio broadcaster or at an informal gathering, is making a transition from the end of one song to the beginning of the next. Listeners desire transitions that sound natural, while songs (and other sounds) have a wide variety of beginnings and endings, at least some of which are important to presentation of the song.
A second known issue in playing songs is that of ordering a set of songs for presentation, or alternatively, of selecting a next song for presentation when one song ends. After any particular song, listeners remain relatively uninformed about which song would be best that they should play next. One known method is for a person to prepare a song sequence, sometimes known as a “playlist”, ahead of time, exercising their human judgment about which songs should follow which. This method has the first drawback that it can be time consuming, and the second drawback that it might take substantial originality to prepare a playlist that is pleasing to listeners.
The invention includes techniques for constructing and presenting sound sequences, and for commerce in those sequences.
Presentation includes determining—in response to metadata about those songs, sources of those songs, two functions of pairs of songs (in a preferred embodiment, these two functions operate to form relationships between song metadata and types of transitions), and a set of user preferences—in what manner to transition from one song to a next song. Where appropriate, this aspect also includes performing the transition. As described below, a transition between songs includes any activity near the end of a first song and near the beginning of a second song, including altering a digital encoding of the coded audio signal representing those songs.
After reading this application, those skilled in the art would recognize that the first function and the second function perform distinct useful functions, as described below. The first function operates to determine whether or not to conduct a transition between songs, that is, the first function includes a “whether-to” function, while the second function operates to determine a method of conducting a transition between songs, that is, the second function includes a “how-to” function, for transitions.
Construction includes—in response to the same or similar factors—determining a playlist likely to be pleasing to listeners. Construction of the playlist, as exemplified by the selection of which songs to include and where to place those songs in the playlist order, can also be responsive to a set of sources of those songs, responsive to metadata about those songs, responsive to one or more user preferences about those songs and possible transitions, responsive to whether listeners will perceive the playlist as substantially without human-perceivable pattern, and responsive to whether adjacent songs would be perceived by listeners as having relatively pleasing transitions.
Presentation also includes—having constructed a playlist or obtained one from a person who created a playlist—providing a user interface by which listeners can select playlists for presentation, searching playlists in response to metadata and user requests about those playlists, and selling licenses to those playlists to listeners.
Commerce includes providing an automatic or partially automatic technique for listeners to buy those licenses, either individually or in bulk.
The invention is further described below with respect to preferred embodiments. No admission is made that these preferred embodiments are the only possible embodiments, or even the majority of embodiments, of the invention.
These techniques can be performed using a presentation system with access to a database of metadata about those songs and sources of those songs, and with ability to compute transition functions between songs, and with ability to receive or deduce user preferences for song transitions. In a preferred embodiment, metadata obtained from that database, whether cached or dynamically accessed, plays a substantial role in determining methods for transitioning between adjacent songs in a playlist, or modifying a song at the beginning or end of the playlist. In this context, the substantial role performed by that metadata is consistent with a model of using an external database of useful information to influence local behavior of home theaters and related devices. In a preferred embodiment, these techniques can be performed using a home theater system, in which the presentation system controls substantially all equipment associated with presentation; the system is responsive to a sequence of songs to be presented, and the system controls the presentation equipment to conduct transitions as it so determines.
In preferred embodiments, the system—which might be a functional component of a presentation system or another system—has access to a database of metadata about those songs and user rights associated with those songs (whether the same database as for presentation, or otherwise), has ability to determine transitions between songs (whether the same transitions as for presentation, or otherwise), and has ability to determine a degree of whether listeners will perceive the playlist as substantially without pattern. The latter is sometimes referred to herein as perceptually random, as distinct from statistically random.
In preferred embodiments, the system provides a user interface such as those described in the incorporated disclosure; in particular, the system can represent each playlist as an object in the mosaic-like user interface, such as for example the user interface described in [KAL 18], with similar playlists (according to some metric) being placed relatively closer than less-similar playlists. A pictorial representation of a song might preferably include a cover of an anthology or CD emboding that playlist, a representation of the genre or singers associated with that playlist, or a picture of a celebrity associated with that playlist. For example, the latter might show a flattering photograph of Professor Watson to represent a playlist titled “Professor Watson's duets for coffee cups and donuts”.
In preferred embodiments, the user interface, whether mosaic-like or otherwise, provides for selecting a playlist for presentation, and for searching those playlists available to the system in response to metadata about those playlists. The user interface also preferably distinguishes those playlists licensed to the user from those that are not, allows the user to select a collection of playlists for purchase, either individually or in bulk, and allows the user to order playlists auto-matically or with minimal intervention.
This application should be read in the most general possible form. This includes, without limitation, the following:
After reading this application, those skilled in the art would see the generality of this description.
The general meaning of each of these following terms is intended to be illustrative and in no way limiting.
The scope and spirit of the invention is not limited to any of these definitions, or to specific examples mentioned therein, but is intended to include the most general concepts embodied by these and other terms.
A system 100 includes elements shown in the figure, including at least the following:
In a preferred embodiment, a major physical portion of the system 100 would be located in, or coupled to, a home theater or other home entertainment system. This would include at least the computing device 110, the input/output elements number 120, and at least part of the communication link number 130.
The first database 140 and the second database 150 would be located external to the home entertainment system, such as for example at a server location at which the first database 140 and the second database 150 are maintained. However, the system number 100 might cache significant portions of the first database 140 or the second database 150, for relative ease, reliability, speed, or other reasons. In an alternative embodiment, each of the first database 140 or the second database 150 can be an amalgamation of several databases from different sources with similar types of information.
As described herein, the “user” of the system 100 typically refers to an individual person, or a set of persons, with access to a set of user controls for manipulating a user interface associated with the system 100. However, in alternative embodiments, a “user” of the system 100 might refer to a controlling program, such as a programmable timer system or a remote device (for when the user wishes to control the system on the way home from work), or might even refer to an Artificial Intelligence program or another substitute for actual human control.
The computing device 110 includes elements shown in the figure, including at least the following:
The computing element 111 includes a processor, memory, and mass storage, configured as in a known desktop, laptop, or server device. In a preferred embodiment, the mass storage includes both attached mass storage, such as a hard disk drive, and detachable mass storage, such as an optical disc reader for CD, DVD, HD DVD, or Blu-ray type discs. However, in the context of the invention, there is no particular requirement that the computing element 111 include those elements, so long as the computing element 111 is capable of performing the maintaining its state as described herein, and performing the method steps described herein. For a first example, there is no particular requirement that the computing element 111 include mass storage, although the inventors expect that a preferred embodiment will include mass storage. (At least currently, songs are commonly encoded as relatively large digital files representing those media, while the computing device 110 is expected to have direct access to those digital files.) For a second example, there is no particular requirement that the computing element 111 is structured as a deterministic device—nondeterministic devices, such as including parallel processing devices, would work as well.
The first set of instructions 112 are interpretable by the computing element 111, and relate to constructing and presenting sound sequences. In a preferred embodiment, the computing element 111 is coupled to hardware devices for presenting sound sequences, such as speakers and other home theater equipment. This has the effect that the computing element 111, upon interpreting the first set of instructions 112, can construct and present the sound sequences in a form capable of being received by users. In some embodiments, the first set of instructions 112 might include actual audio or video data for direct presentation to the user.
The first record 113 includes information describing a first set of transition functions fn1(s1, s2), each of which describes whether there should be a transition, sometimes referred to herein as a “cross-fade”, between its corresponding pair of sound sequences. In a preferred embodiment, the transition functions in this first set are responsive to metadata about the songs, such as for example their genre, whether they appear on the same CD-ROM or DVD formatted medium, whether the song has a beginning or ending that already accounts for a transition (such as for example an slow increase in volume at a beginning of the song or a slow decrease in volume at the end of the song), and the like. In a preferred embodiment, the transition functions in this first set are Boolean and describe at least the following behavior:
The second set of instructions (114a and 114b) are interpretable by the computing element 111, and are capable of directing the computing element 111 to access the first database 140. In a preferred embodiment, the first database 140 includes information regarding each sound sequence, and regarding each pair of sound sequences, suitable to provide the computing element 111 with the ability to determine whether there is a reason—in addition to, in combination with, or instead of, the information in the record 113 of first transition functions fn1(s1, s2) for a particular decision regarding whether to cross-fade between the sound sequences.
For one example, the first database 140 might include at least information regarding whether to make a song transition between songs, such as responsive to information about pairs of those songs, including their artist, genre, title, track recording, and the like. Thus, the first database 140 might indicate that a sequence of two classical music songs should not have an induced transition other than a brief silent gap. After reading this application, those skilled in the art will recognize that the first database 140 includes at least some of the body of knowledge about songs that experts, such as DJs, use to determine whether or not to perform song transitions. This type of information is not generally easy to collect, or to learn, and is thus believed to be a valuable addition to the functional capabilities of the system.
The instructions 114b, responsive to metadata relating to songs, apply that metadata as input to the first transition functions fn1(s1, s2). For example, information in the first database 140 might describe that a particular first song s1 and a particular second song s2 follow consecutively on a commercially-available CD. For another example, information in the first database 140 might describe that a pair of songs are the first and last tracks in pair of consecutive discs in a commercially-available boxed set of discs. This has the effect that the instructions 114b, in conjunction with information from the first database 140, direct the computing element 111 to determine whether or not to perform a transition between the particular first song s1 and a particular second song s2. A first possibility is that the computing element 111 might determine to perform the transition; a second possibility is that the computing element 111 might determine not to perform the transition.
The second record 115 (along with associated instructions) includes information regarding express user preferences for transitions. (In a preferred embodiment, the information in the second record 115 is interpretable by the computing element 111 under the direction of those instructions for parsing that second record 115.) This has the effect that the user might suppress transitions entirely, force transitions in cases where the first transition functions or the first database 140 would indicate otherwise, or indicate other preferences regarding transitions. For one example, the user might specify that the computing element 111 should perform transitions at the default, in all cases where transitions are not explicitly prohibited by the first transition functions or the first database 140.
The third set of instructions 116 are interpretable by the computing element 111, and are capable of directing the computing element 111 how to transition sound sequences. In a preferred embodiment, the computing element 111 is capable of using the third set of instructions 116 in addition to, in combination with, or instead of, the first set of instructions 112. This has the effect that the computing element 111, upon interpreting the third set of instructions 116, can construct and present the sound sequences in a transitioned form, with users being capable of receiving that transitioned form.
The third record 117 includes information relating to second transition functions fn2(s1, s2), each of which describes how to transition, e.g., cross-fade, between its corresponding pair of sound sequences. Similarly to the first transition functions fn1(s1, s2), the second transition functions fn2(s1, s2), are responsive to metadata about the songs s1 and s2, such as for example their
In one example, first transition functions fn1(s1, s2), applied to songs that are both classical music, might provide a result indicative of “no transition”, that is (roughly speaking), fn1(classical, classical)=FALSE, while first transition functions fn1(s1, s2), applied to songs that are both disco music, might provide a result indicative of “yes transition”, that is (roughly speaking), fn1(disco, disco)=TRUE.
In this example, once the first transition functions fn1(s1, s2), applied to songs that are both classical music, indicate fn1(classical, classical)=FALSE, the second transition functions fn2(s1, s2) need not specify how to perform a transition, because it is determined not to perform one. In contrast, once the first transition functions fn1(s1, s2), applied to songs that are both disco music, indicate fn1(disco, disco)=TRUE, the second transition functions fn2(s1, s2) do specify how to perform that transition, using values obtained from fn2(disco, disco). For example, fn2(disco, disco) might indicate that the transition from one disco song to another will include a symmetric six-second cross-fade of the two songs.
In a preferred embodiment, the second transition functions fn2(s1, s2), describe at least the following behavior:
In a preferred embodiment, when a transition includes cross-fading two songs, the volume of the transition should not exceed the maximum amplitude of each song.
In a preferred embodiment, if a song that includes audience noise from a live recording then a transition for that song may include fading-out or fading-in that audience noise. If a song includes studio silence from a studio recording then a transition for that song may include preserving that silence.
In a preferred embodiment, even when transitions that do not include a cross-fade (that is, mixing the audio elements of the songs), those transitions might still include insertion or addition of other audiovisual effects. These audiovisual effects might include, for example, at least one of the following:
In a preferred embodiment, the first database 140 and the second database 150 include information sufficient to direct the computing element 111 to perform (or direct) the actions described above.
The fourth set of instructions (118a and 118b) are interpretable by the computing element 111, and are capable of directing the computing element 111 how to access the second database 150. In a preferred embodiment, the second database 150 includes information regarding each pair of sound sequences, suitable to provide the computing element 111, upon interpreting the fourth set of instructions 118, with the ability to determine how to perform—in addition to, in combination with, or instead of, the second transition functions fn2(s1, s2)—a particular transition between the sound sequences.
In a preferred embodiment, for example, the second database 150 includes sufficient information for the computing element 111 to construct (or lookup) a transition between songs. In a preferred embodiment, the second database 150 might include the examples of second transition functions fn2(s1, s2), described above.
For one example, the second database 150 might include at least information regarding what transitions to make between songs, such as responsive to information about pairs of those songs, including their artist, genre, title, track numbering (as found for example on CD-ROMs and DVDs), track recording, and the like. Thus, the second database 150 might indicate that a sequence of two steel drum band songs should have an induced transition which is an overlap of a muted end of the first song with a muted beginning of the second song, while it might also indicate that a sequence of two disco songs should have an induced transition including a volume fade-out of a first song and a volume fade-in of a second song.
After reading this application, those skilled in the art will recognize that the second database 150 includes at least some of the body of knowledge about songs that experts, such as filtering and mixing engineers, use to determine how to perform song transitions. This type of information is not generally easy to collect, to learn, or to apply by an automated system, and is thus believed to be a valuable addition to the functional capabilities of the system.
The instructions 118, responsive to metadata relating to songs, apply that metadata as input to the second transition functions fn2(s1, s2). For example, information in the second database 150 might describe that a particular first song s1 and a particular second song s2 match well (that is, are pleasing to listeners) when that first song s1 precedes that second song s2. This has the effect that the instructions 118, in conjunction with information from the second database 150, direct the computing element 111 to perform a transition between the particular first song s1 and a particular second song s2. There are many types of possible transition types that might be selected in response to information about the particular first song s1 and the particular second song s2.
The fourth record 119 includes information regarding deduced user preferences for cross-fade, and a set of instructions interpretable by the computing device 110 for deducing those user preferences. (In a preferred embodiment, the information in the fourth record 119 is interpretable by the computing element 111 under the direction of a set of instructions for parsing that fourth record 119.) Possible deduced user preferences include one or more of, or some combination of, the following:
In a preferred embodiment, user preferences might be determined in one or more of several ways:
In a preferred embodiment, the computing device 110 makes these deductions under control of instructions interpretable to perform machine learning. Possible machine learning techniques for deducing user preferences include one or more of, or some combination of, the following:
The input/output elements 120 include elements shown in the figure, including at least the following:
In a preferred embodiment, the sound sequence input 121 might include a reader for any particular physical medium on which sound sequences can be stored, such as CD-ROM, DVD, or a set of memory or mass storage (e.g., in the latter case, hard disk drives). In alternative embodiments, the sound sequence input 121 may in addition or instead include a receiver for any particular communication of sound sequences, such as a radio, television, or computer network input. In the context of the invention, there is no particular requirement for any individual choice of physical devices for the sound sequence input 121, so long as the computing device 110 is capable of maintaining the information, and performing the methods, as described herein, with respect to those sound sequences. As noted above, in a preferred embodiment, the sound sequence input 121 might be included in a home theater or home entertainment system.
In a preferred embodiment, a home theater or home entertainment system includes the sound sequence output 122. In the context of the invention, there is no particular requirement for the physical construction of the sound sequence output 122, so long as the computing device 110 is capable of presenting sound sequences to the user.
The message input 123 is coupled to the communication link 130 and to the computing device 110, and is capable of receiving messages on behalf of the computing device 110. As described herein, messages might be received on behalf of the computing device 110 from either the first database 140 or the second database 150, from an external source of a sound sequence or a license to a sound sequence, and the like.
Similarly, the message output 124 is coupled to the communication link 130 and to the computing device 110, and is capable of sending messages on behalf of the computing device 110. As described herein, messages might be sent on behalf of the computing device 110 to either the first database 140 or the second database 150 (e.g., as part of a request for information), to an external source of a sound sequence or a license to a sound sequence (e.g., as part of a commercial transaction regarding that sound sequence), and the like.
Similar to the message input 123, the user command input 125 is coupled to a user interface and the computing device 110, and is capable of receiving messages from the user on behalf of the computing device 110.
Similar to the message output 124, the user command output 126 is coupled to a user interface and the computing device 110, and is capable of sending messages to the user on behalf of the computing device 110, e.g., as part of a user interface.
The communication link 130 is coupled to the message input 123 and the message output 124, at a first end, and to an external communication network, such as the Internet, at a second end. In a preferred embodiment, the communication link 130 transfers messages between the computing device 110 and any external devices, including the first database 140 and the second database 150, with which the computing device 110 communicates.
The first database 140 includes mass storage 141 including at least the information described herein, organized so as to be retrievable by a set of database requests, and a server 142 capable of receiving and responding to database requests for information from that mass storage 141.
Similarly, the second database 150 includes mass storage 151 including at least the information described herein, organized so as to be retrievable by a set of database requests, and a server 152 capable of receiving and responding to database requests for information from that mass storage 151.
A method 210 of determining whether to cross-fade in response to a song and metadata about that song includes flow points and steps shown in the figure, including at least the following:
At a flow point 210A, a beginning of the method 210 is defined.
At a step 211, a first song is received by the computing device 110.
At a step 212, the first song is presented to the user by the computing device 110.
At a step 213, an end of the first song is noted by the computing device 110. In a preferred embodiment, this step 213 is performed substantially simultaneously with the previous step, and in any event, substantially before the end of the first song is required to be presented to the user.
At a step 214, the computing device 110 determines metadata relating to the first song. As noted above, the metadata relating to the first song might include information from the first transition functions, the first database 140, the explicit user preferences, or other sources.
At a step 215, the computing device 110 concludes, from the metadata determined in the previous step, whether or not to cross-fade.
At a flow point 210B, if the computing device 110 concluded that the first song should be cross-faded, the method 210 proceeds with the method 230.
At a flow point 210C, if the computing device 110 concluded that the first song should not be cross-faded, an end of the method 210 is defined.
A method 220 of determining whether to cross-fade in response to a first song includes flow points and steps shown in the figure, including at least the following:
At a flow point 220A, a beginning of the method 220 is defined.
At a step 221, a first song is received by the computing device 110.
At a step 222, the first song is presented to the user by the computing device 110.
At a step 223, an end of the first song is noted by the computing device 110. In a preferred embodiment, this step is performed substantially simultaneously with the previous step, and in any event, substantially before the end of the first song is required to be presented to the user. For example, determining whether to transition between the first song and the second song, and if so, how to make that transition, is preferably performed well in advance of having to calculate and present the audiovisual effects associated with that transition.
At a step 224, a beginning of the second song is noted by the computing device 110. In a preferred embodiment, similar to the previous step, this step is performed substantially simultaneously with the previous step, and in any event, substantially before the beginning of the second song is required to be presented to the user.
At a step 225, the computing device 110 notes an interaction between the first song and the second song. In a preferred embodiment, similar to the previous step, this step is performed substantially simultaneously with the previous step, and in any event, substantially before any transition between the first song and the second song is required to be presented to the user.
At a step 226, the computing device 110 concludes, from the interaction noted in the previous step, whether or not to cross-fade.
At a flow point 220B, if the computing device 110 concluded that the first song should be cross-faded, the method 220 proceeds with the method 230.
At a flow point 220C, if the computing device 110 concluded that the first song should not be cross-faded, an end of the method 220 is defined.
A method 230 of performing cross-fading includes flow points and steps shown in the figure, including at least the following:
At a flow point 230A, a beginning of the method 230 is defined.
At a step 231, an end of the first song is received by the computing device 110.
At a step 232, a beginning of the second song is received by the computing device 110.
At a step 233, an end of the first song is noted by the computing device 110. In a preferred embodiment, this step is performed substantially simultaneously with the previous step, and in any event, substantially before the end of the first song is required to be presented to the user.
At a step 234, the computing device 110 determines metadata relating to how to transition between the first song and the second song. As noted above, the metadata relating to the transition between the first song and the second song might include information from the second transition functions, the second database 150, the deduced user preferences, or other sources.
At a step 235, the computing device 110 concludes, from the metadata noted in the previous step, how to perform the transition between the first song and the second song.
At a step 236, the computing device 110 performs the transition between the first song and the second song.
At a step 237, the transition between the first song and the second song, followed by the second song, are presented to the user by the computing device 110.
At a flow point 230B, an end of the method 230 is defined.
After reading this application, those skilled in the art will recognize that the steps in methods 210, 220, 230 for determining whether to transition and how to transition between songs can also be performed separately from the steps of presenting the songs. That is, the steps 212, 222 and 237 of presenting songs and transitions can be performed after the steps of computing the transition have already been performed, in addition to any other methods shown herein.
A method 310 of constructing a playlist includes flow points and steps shown in the figure, including at least the following:
At a flow point 310A, a beginning of the method 310 is defined.
At a flow point 310B, a beginning of a first procedure (to select songs) is defined. The computing device 110 performs the steps from this flow point to the flow point 310C repeatedly until it selects a complete playlist, including “enough” songs.
At a step 311, the computing device 110 selects a first song from a set of possible songs for the playlist, and assigns that first song as the next song to be selected.
At a step 312, the computing device 110 selects a song to best fit next in the playlist. In selecting a best fit song, the computing device 110 considers one or more of, or some combination of, the following factors:
After reading this application, those skilled in art will recognize that the use of weighted values allows the system to place more or less emphasis, as desired by the user either explicitly or implicitly, on particular aspects of forming playlists. The particular weighted values listed herein are intended to be exemplary only, and are not intended to be exhaustive or limiting in any way.
For just one example, playlists (and the transitions between songs upon which they depend) might be constructed by reference to external databases of expert information. These might be included in, or supplement, the information available in the first database 140 and the second database 150. In a preferred embodiment, construction of a playlist should best attempt to optimize a number of factors, including desirability of the songs to the user, availability of the songs in an ordering that is pleasing and perceptually random, and smoothness of transitions between those songs. These particular factors listed herein are intended to be exemplary only, and are not intended to be exhaustive or limiting in any way.
At a step 313, the computing device 110 selects the next song for the playlist.
At a step 314, the computing device 110 determines if there are enough songs for the playlist. In making this determination, the computing device 110 considers one or more of, or some combination of, the following factors:
At a flow point 310C, an end to the first procedure (to select songs) is defined.
At a flow point 310D, a beginning of a second procedure (to optimize the playlist) is defined.
At a step 315, the computing device 110 evaluates the most recently constructed playlist.
At a step 316, the computing device 110 attempts to optimize the playlist among all playlists constructed so far. To perform optimization, the the computing device 110 might use one or more of, or some combination of, the following optimization techniques:
At a step 317, the computing device 110 determines if enough optimizing has been performed. The type of operation to perform this step depends, as described in the previous step, on the type of optimizing technique the computing device 110 uses.
At a flow point 310E, an end of the second procedure (to optimize the playlist) is defined.
At a flow point 310F, an end of the method 310 is defined.
A method 320 of purchasing songs using playlists includes flow points and steps shown in the figure, including at least the following:
At a flow point 320A, a beginning of the method 320 is defined.
At a step 321, the computing device 110 presents a description of a set of playlists to the user. In a preferred embodiment, the computing device 110 uses a user interface similar to the “Mosaic” user interface described in the incorporated disclosure, with the enhancement provided of graying out those songs to which the user has limited (or perhaps no) rights.
At a step 322, the computing device 110 receives input from the user, selecting a playlist to review.
At a step 323, the computing device 110 presents a description of the selected playlist to the user. For example, the computing device 110 might list the songs in the playlist, or might present a set of pictorial representations of those songs for the user to peruse.
At a step 324, the computing device 110 receives input from the user, selecting a playlist to purchase.
At a step 325, the computing device 110 conducts a commercial transaction, on behalf of the user, with an external license server. This has the effect that the user obtains new rights to the purchased playlist. In a preferred embodiment, the computing device 110 purchases only those songs in the playlist (or set of playlists) needed for the user to complete the selected playlists. Also in a preferred embodiment, the computing device 110 already has the selected playlists speculatively downloaded from the external license server, needing only a license key to provide the user with the ability to present those playlists (or the songs therein).
This invention should be read in the most general possible form. This includes, without limitation, the following possibilities included within the scope of, or enabled by, the invention.
After reading this application, those skilled in the art would recognize that the decision to perform transitions between two songs is not restricted to information about those two songs only. For a given song in a playlist, when the system is deciding whether to perform a transition and how to perform a transition at that song, the system may refer to the information about all the songs in the playlist, not just the previous song or next song. The system may refer to any ordered n-tuple or any collection of songs within the playlist (whether sequential or not) while making its decisions about transitions for a given song. For example, if a playlist includes a particular song, then the presence of that song may influence the decision to perform a transition be
Similarly, after reading this application, those skilled in the art would recognize that the construction of playlists does not depend on pairs of songs only. At step 312 when the system is finding a next song to add to a partially constructed playlist, the system may refer to all the songs in the partially constructed playlist, not only the previous song. At the optimization steps 316 and 317 it is clear that the system is evaluating collections of songs, not only pairs of songs. For example, the system may consider the smoothness of the transitions between some or all pairs of songs in the playlist, not only the pair under evaluation in any step of method 310.
After reading this application, those skilled in the art would see the generality of this application.
This application is a continuation of copending application U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/704,165, filed on Feb. 8, 2007, which is hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11704165 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 12987924 | US |