Not applicable.
This invention was made with State of California support under California Energy Commission grant number PIR-08-012. The Energy Commission has certain rights to this invention.
Not applicable.
[1] Many self-supporting (unburied) liquid storage tank designs, of both metallic and polymeric construction, are available in the prior art. A frequent goal is to maximize the volume of contained liquid while reasonably minimizing both the plan area under the tank and the amount of tank materials, the latter to minimize both costs and dry weight. The general structural problem for such tanks is that the deeper the tank and the liquid contained, the greater the hydraulic forces on the tank walls near the bottom. For many indoor applications, the tank must be able to pass through doorways to reach the installation location. Shape, materials, and fabrication method are important considerations for tank design.
[2] There are four methods commonly used in the production of liquid storage tanks. Steel and stainless steel tanks are fabricated from sheet material that is cut and welded, either automated or by hand. Their resistance to elevated pressures and temperatures makes them popular for domestic water heaters and many commercial and industrial applications. But rising material costs and fabrication expense result in high prices relative to storage capacity. Steel tanks generally last less than 10 years, which can be extended for a few years with glass lining. Stainless steel tanks are well suited to high-purity or corrosive chemical applications, but prices are about double those of similar sized steel tanks. U.S. regulations require that pressurized vessels of 120 gallons or more be individually tested during manufacturing, and wall thickness must increase substantially in larger sizes to maintain the pressure rating. For these reasons and also heavy dry tank weights, larger liquid storage tanks are usually unpressurized.
[3] Although some unpressurized tanks are made from steel, such as those used to store crude oil, most unpressurized tanks are made from polymeric materials due to lower cost and corrosion resistance. The least expensive liquid containers per unit volume are soft, shallow membrane bags, but these are typically not practical in and around buildings where ground area is valuable. Also, their relatively thin, flexible walls risk leakage in long-term applications where they are vulnerable to accidental puncture. Rotationally molded rigid polymer tanks are popular for large volume outdoor water storage in residential or agricultural applications due to their durability and low cost, and some smaller rigid vessels are blow molded.
[4] The fourth type of storage tanks use a rigid structure made from a variety of materials and then lined with a flexible polymer membrane. The flexible liners are cut from roll material such as vinyl and welded using radio frequency or ultrasonic equipment. The structural casings are either custom built or delivered unassembled with the liner. Flexible liner tanks make it possible to install very large indoor tanks without the access doors that a rigid tank would require.
[5] The invention described herein is best suited to rigid molded polymer tanks, which provide the most opportunity for complex tank shapes. Tooling costs may increase, but the impact on unit tank price of increased shape complexity is minimal. However, there is no practical limitation preventing the incorporation of this invention into fabricated steel vessels or flexible polymer tanks.
[6] This invention is ideally suited to thermal storage tanks, such as those used in solar systems. Maintaining thermal stratification in a solar storage tank improves system efficiency. Stratification can be promoted and maintained by extracting liquid from the bottom of the tank where it is coolest, and returning it to the top. In polymeric tanks, which have very modest vertical heat conduction through the tank walls, thermal stratification of 20 to 40 degrees C. can be maintained if liquid velocities entering and leaving the tank are limited to prevent mixing. However, the use of polymer materials in thermal storage tanks is particularly challenging because the elevated temperatures can lead to a significant reduction in stiffness and strength.
[7] Liquid storage tanks that more effectively use vertical space are most efficient structurally when configured as vertical-axis cylinders. These “hoop design” tanks can minimize wall thickness using materials with high tensile strength. Rotationally-molded cylindrical tanks are now very common, even for sizes as large as 15,000 gallons. The vast majority of pressurized steel tanks are cylinders to take advantage of the hoop strength principle. In an optimal design, walls of cylindrical tanks are gradually thinner proceeding from bottom to top, matching the hydraulic forces, and some manufacturers of rotational molding equipment are now able to control the process toward this end. While most of these designs are cylindrical, the rotational molding process offers significant opportunities for forming polymeric tanks with complex shapes, a direction pursued with this invention.
[8] The primary disadvantage of the vertical-axis cylinder is that it leaves more than 21% (100*(1−π/4)) of the available volume unoccupied. Where large indoor thermal storage capacity is required, multiple tanks must be used, with each tank able to pass through doorways to gain access to the final location. Again, vertical-axis cylinder tanks provide 21% less capacity than a tank with a square footprint that is able to pass through the same width doorway. A tank with a rectangular footprint extends this advantage further. Square and rectangular tanks make better use of floorspace and require fewer manifold connections. Because they can be installed tight against each other, heat losses and structural requirements for tanks at the center of the array are reduced.
[9] A patent search of six key class/subclass categories yielded not one patent relevant enough to cite. But several relevant rotationally-molded 400 gallon human-height semi-rectangular tanks, labeled “doorway tanks” are available. (See Norwesco http://www.tank-depot.com/productdetails.aspx?part=TN400XWT and Snyder http://www.tank-depot.com/productdetails.aspx?part=Sll-Closet400.) Their goal is to maximize volume in a tank that can fit through a typical residential doorway. Both designs use multiple (two) full perimeter horizontal indentations as wall stiffeners, and both include a pair of horizontal-axis cylindrical holes through the long wall of the rectangular tank. The Norwesco tank places the holes one-above the other, each centered on a horizontal indentation, while the Snyder tank has them side-by-side, between the two horizontal indentations. Neither design maximizes volume due to their large horizontal indentations and the through-cylinders. Both “single-tank” designs contain 10-13% more liquid compared to a pair of side-by-side cylindrical tanks occupying the same floor area. While these available tanks offer cost advantages compared to simple vertical-axis cylinders, further cost-effective volume increases are possible with the design documented here.
[10] The invention describes molded tanks that combine the strength of cylinders with the space economy of rectangular solids. A simple version forms a square in plan view that transitions to a horizontal circle in a plane above its floor, transitioning back and forth from square to circle several times, finishing as a square at the top of the tank. A circular opening may be provided on the top if necessary for access to the interior of the tank. The tank transitions from its predominantly square cross-section to cylindrical bands whose hoop strength prevents significant outward bulging of the side walls. The cylindrical bands are more closely spaced near the bottom where hydraulic pressure is greatest. Spacing of the cylinders depends on wall thickness for the rectangular elements. The walls of these elements span vertically from the floor plane to the first cylinder, then from cylinder to cylinder, and finally, at the top, from cylinder to horizontal top plane. In stratified polymeric thermal storage tanks, higher temperatures at the upper elements may necessitate uniform cylinder spacing, or even closer spacings at the top of the tank, since the polymers have lower strength at higher temperature. The cylinders also provide a convenient location for the placement of reinforcing bands made from high-tensile strength materials such as steel. Such metal bands offer good strength at elevated temperatures, as well as resistance to structural creep, both problematic for polymer materials.
[11] The rotational molding process also allows single tanks that are rectangular in plan with the length of the long side of the rectangle an integer multiple of the length of the short side of the rectangle. In these designs the cylindrical bands are centered in adjacent squares aligned vertically to create through-holes so that the bands provide continuous hoop strength in each square of the multi-square plan. For additional strength, cylinder sections with the horizontal axes can be located where the squares join.
[12] Objects of the invention:
[13]
In
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19] The number and spacing of cylindrical bands affect the required wall thickness to withstand the hydraulic loads. Increasing the number of bands can shorten the vertical spans, which will reduce deflections for a given wall thickness, or can allow thinner walls for an allowed deflection. The vertical spacings can be varied from closer at the bottom to wider at the top to maintain constant deflections in all flat sections. Table 1 tabulates “equal deflection” spacings for tanks with 1 through 6 cylinders (2 through 7 vertical wall sections). The spacings are shown in Table 1 as percentages of total tank water depth. For example, a “4 section” tank with three cylinders would have the following height percentages per section, moving from bottom to top: 20.8%, 22.3%, 24.8%, 32.0%. The economics of cylinder spacing can be studied for a given allowable deflection by computing the material requirements. Appropriately spaced, more cylinders allow thinner walls but require additional surface area in the square-to-cylinder transitions. And each added ring reduces storage volume. Adding high-tensile bands around the cylinders can also affect economics since either the strength of the cylinders or the deflection of the flat panels can become the limiting structural criterion.
[20] The number and spacing of cylindrical bands affect the required wall thickness to withstand the hydraulic loads. Increasing the number of bands can shorten the vertical spans, which will reduce deflections for a given wall thickness, or can allow thinner walls for an allowed deflection. The vertical spacings can be varied from closer at the bottom to wider at the top to maintain constant deflections in all flat sections.
[21] With planar panels 2 and 11 and wall thickness comparable to the cited “doorway” tanks, the designs disclosed here lose less than 3% of the potential “rectangular solid” volume as a result of their cylindrical bands, compared with 10% lost volume for the available tanks.
This application does not cross-reference existing non-provisional utility patent applications. However, it is related to USPTO provisional application 61/460,472.
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61460472 | Jan 2011 | US |