Rocket bodies from decades of launching satellites into Earth orbit are the largest component of space debris by mass. They may pose a significant present and future threat to operate space systems in certain orbits. Per the unclassified US catalog as of 1 Jan. 2017, there were 968 derelict rocket bodies in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) with perigees below 2100 km and inclinations ranging from near equatorial to retrograde as depicted in
A significant amount of all the debris mass in LEO is embodied within 18 SL-16 rocket bodies. Each SL-16 rocket body has a mass of 8300 kg and measures 4 m by 10 m in diameter and length. The current cluster of SL-16 objects is dispersed across multiple altitudes from 750 to 850 km with widely varying inclinations from 70 to 100 degrees in inclination. A collision between any 2 of SL-16s would double the number of objects in the LEO catalog.
Traditionally, the active de-orbit problem has been solved through clever exploitation of orbital mechanics and physics to provide orbital authority. The focus has been on extracting free delta-V to ensure that system mass is minimized and that this “low priority” mission is not a burden on current space architectures. Design efforts have been focused on the capabilities of drag devices and propulsion systems, which leaves the engagement system often overlooked or left as a problem to solve later.
Exemplary embodiments described herein include innovative engagement devices. Exemplary engagement devices may include on or more tape spring systems. The tape spring system may include a continuous or segmented bi-stable tape spring. The tape spring can be stowed in a rolled up configuration, extended to a deployed configuration, and then triggered to return to a low energy retracted configuration. The tape spring can also include a triggered return condition of other shapes, such as a linear, curvi-linear, or other configuration instead of the rolled configuration.
Exemplary embodiments of the engagement device may be coupled to conventional deorbit engines or deorbit engines as described herein. Exemplary engines described herein may include propellant-less engines. Exemplary engines described herein may be used to deorbit an engaged debris and/or may be used to navigate the engagement device to the debris object before engagement of the engagement device.
Exemplary embodiments of the engagement device may be used to capture the target SL-16 rocket bodies (or other object bodies of interest). Exemplary embodiments may therefore include navigating the engagement device to the object of interest, deploying the engagement device, using the engagement device to couple to the object of interest, and deploy the deorbit engine to deorbit the object of interest.
In the following description of preferred embodiments, reference is made to the accompanying drawings which form a part hereof, and in which it is shown by way of illustration specific embodiments in which the invention can be practiced. It is to be understood that other embodiments can be used and structural changes can be made without departing from the scope of the embodiments of this invention.
Exemplary embodiments described herein may use tape springs to capture debris of interest. This innovative capture mechanism coupled with traditional de-orbit devices (prop modules, drag devices, tethers) to create a tape-spring engagement de-orbit system is a unique solution that addresses a growing need in space debris control. Exemplary embodiments include a novel engagement system that can couple well with traditional deorbit engines to provide a desired 10× deorbit time reduction as compared to conventional drag devices.
Although embodiments of the invention may be described and illustrated herein in terms of a debris deorbit mechanisms, it should be understood that embodiments of this invention are not so limited, but are additionally applicable to other applications. For example, component parts, such as the tape spring engagement system, may be used as an attachment method for other applications, including space applications. Also, embodiments described herein focus on the deorbit of rocket bodies, but this concept is applicable to many space-junk geometries or other objects. It is possible to tailor low energy states for the tape springs such that debris of various sizes can be engaged. It should also be noted that while the exemplary embodiment is described using only two tapes, it is possible that multiple tapes in various orientations are advantageous to engagement. Exemplary embodiments may include a single tape spring or any combination of a plurality of tape springs.
As seen in
Referring back to
Exemplary embodiments of the system may include a housing. The housing may define a volume for the remaining system components, such as the engagement device and deorbit engine. The housing may contain the system components in a stored configuration. In an exemplary embodiment, the system may be fully contained within the housing in the stored configuration. The system may also be partially contained, such that the housing may include one or more partial housings for different component parts, such as the engagement device and the deorbit engine. The system may be configured to position the engagement device comprising one or more spring tapes in a rolled position for the stored configuration.
Exemplary embodiments of the system may include an engagement device. The engagement device may include one or more tape springs. The engagement device may include one or more actuators to change the tape spring from one configuration to another configuration. The one or more actuators may be used to extend the tape spring from the stored configuration to the deployed configuration. The stored configuration may be when the tape spring is substantially or fully rolled. The extended configuration may be when the tape spring is substantially or fully elongated. In an exemplary embodiment, the tape spring is fully deployed when it is linearly extended to define an elongated, generally linear extension to a maximum length. The tape spring may itself define a curved cross section, but the tape spring may be linear along a length of the tape spring when extended. The one or more actuators may be used to retract the tape spring to revert the tape spring toward the rolled configuration, although the retraction may not return the tape spring to a fully rolled shaped. The retracted configuration may be any non-linear orientation of the spring along its length, such as curved for the entire or substantial length or curved locally to define a bend between two adjacent generally linear extensions of the tape spring.
Exemplary embodiments include different combinations of tape springs. For example, as shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, the system 100 may include a surface 108 defined between one or more of the tape springs 104. As illustrated in
In an exemplary embodiment, the surface may entirely, shield the target object from the space environment. The membrane may be used to shield the enclosed object. For example, the membrane may include a component, material, or surface that obstructs use of the object. The surface may prevent signals, such as, for example, optical, radio, electric, magnetic, or other signal from being sent or received at the object. The surface 108 may include a coating, material, or combination thereof that interferes with signals or operation of the enclosed object. For example, the material may be opaque or substantially object to photons to reduce or prevent access of light to an photovoltaic array to cut off or reduce power to the object. For example, the material may include a metal or conductive coating and/or metallic or other conductive grid to create a Faraday cage to exclude electromagnetic influences from passing there through. In an exemplary embodiment, the grid may comprise a woven metallic or conductive thread or material.
In an exemplary embodiment, the system may include an actuator for deploying one or more of the tape springs. This can be effected by motors driving or pulling the stowed tape through a straightening mandrel.
In an exemplary embodiment, the system may include an actuator for retracting the one or more tape springs to transition from the deployed configuration to a retracted configuration. When the engagement system is armed, a trigger (or series of triggers along length of spring) can deform the tape spring such that it can begin to roll up into its low energy curved state. In an exemplary embodiment, the trigger may be configured to impose a force on the tape spring to revert the tape spring from its straight to its curved configuration. The trigger may be a mechanical device in contact with the spring. The trigger may be an electromechanical device, such as a piezoelectric material that deforms and imposes a force on the tape spring upon application or removal of an electric signal. Other triggers may be used, such as mechanical, optical, electric, devices and combinations thereof. In an exemplary embodiment, the retraction actuator is configured to deform a cross section of the tape spring to trigger the tape spring to transition to another condition.
Exemplary embodiments may include a control system for the one or more triggers. In an exemplary embodiment the control system may be configured to actuate the retraction actuators in a predetermined orientation, timing, and combination to influence or control the resulting momentum change (such as rotation) of the system relative to the debris. For example, the control system may be used to symmetrically actuate the one or more retraction actuators to avoid or reduce inducing a rotation in the system and misaligning the engagement device with the debris. The retraction actuators may also be controlled to define a shape of the retraction envelope. For example,
In an exemplary embodiment, the system may be configured to retract passively with the tape springs being actuated automatically with contact with the target object. The target object may contact the tape spring and trigger the actuation itself. The system may be configured such that the target object contacts either the tape spring or the target object to trigger the retraction of the tape springs. For example, the tape springs may have the configuration of
Exemplary embodiments of the system may include a propulsion system for navigating the system to an object of interest. The propulsion system may be any propellant and/or propellant less system, such as, for example, solar sails, veins, balloons, rockets, compressed gas or liquid, and combinations thereof. The propulsion system may be the same as or different from the deorbit engine.
Exemplary embodiments of the system may include a deorbit engine. In an exemplary embodiment, the deorbit engine may be deployed from the system after the engagement device is fully engaged with the debris. In this scenario, the system and the debris may be tumbling with the same dynamics as debris. Once the engagement device is fully engaged and deployed, the system may slowly begin to deorbit the debris. Even though deorbit may still be slow, exemplary embodiments may be used to provide a 10× faster rate of deorbit than its natural rate. Passive deorbit engines (balloons, ballutes, and aerobrakes) may be used without additional controls. The passive deorbit engines may be used to simply pull the system to lower orbit over time ending in an uncontrolled reentry of the debris. Active deorbit engines (vane sails, tethers, and traditional propulsion systems) can be used with additional and/or constant control to best utilize the thrust generated by the engine. In an exemplary embodiment, the active engine system may still culminate in an uncontrolled reentry of the debris.
When the system is separated, such as pushed from the host vehicle or launch vehicle that gets the system to an approximately orbit of the debris, it may be necessary or desirable to rendezvous even closer with the debris and hold position while deployment of the engagement device takes place. A simple small sat prop system may be used to maintain position by using image recognition of the debris. Alternatively, the engagement system may be fully deployed prior to release from the host vehicle and engagement may be triggered with a proximity sensor when the engagement device is at a preset distance from the debris. Accordingly, exemplary embodiments may include additional components such as proximity sensor, computer processors and memory, control systems, and combinations thereof to control the deployment and/or navigation of the system relative to the debris.
In an exemplary embodiment, multiple engagement devices can be carried by one capable host vehicle to multiple debris targets, in a milk-run fashion. The multiple units could be designed to stow into an ESPA sized spacecraft and launched as secondary payloads. Several systems may be carried per ESPA bay and multiple ESPA slots per secondary ring. This multiplication would enable cost effective orbital cleanup of large debris objects.
Exemplary embodiments of systems described herein include two major elements: 1) the engagement device, and 2) the deorbit engine. An exemplary packaged system would be targeted to stow into a volume of 1 m×1 m×0.25 m.
Exemplary embodiments include an engagement system using tape springs. The tape spring may be cold-worked in their forming process to build up large internal prestresses. But, they may be stress-free in neither the rolled nor deployed states. However, they may release strain energy as they roll up.
Exemplary embodiments described herein may include tape-springs. Exemplary embodiments of a tape spring may include slit tubes. Exemplary embodiments of a tape spring may be made from both metallic and/or composite materials, as an engagement device. A cylindrical cross-section may be rolled or folded, such that it stores a significant amount of strain energy that may be held during launch. On orbit, this strain energy may be released and used to power deployment of the structure. With this approach, the structure may be fabricated in a cylindrical shape having a reduced stress state in the deployed configuration. Triggers may be used to deform the cross section of the tape spring in the deployed configuration (or elongated shape) to transition the tape spring to the retracted configuration according to embodiments described herein. These devices may be deployed with motors and mechanisms that essentially serve as brakes to control the release of strain energy. Therefore, exemplary triggers may be positioned along a length of a deployed tape spring to target transition of the spring to the retracted configuration.
An exemplary embodiment includes inverse tape-springs that self-retract, rather than self-deploy as an engagement device. Exemplary embodiments, may include a generally tape like (having a substantially reduced thickness as compared to a width dimension) structure. The tape-like structure may have a radius of curvature in a direction perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the tape spring. The cross section of the tape spring may define an arc or curve. The arc may define a single radius such that the cross section of the tape spring may form a portion of a circle. The arc may define other portions of a curve, such as an ellipsoid, ovoid, circle and combinations thereof. The spring may extend generally linearly in a deployed configuration and may be rolled in a stored configuration. The spring may roll on itself in the direction of the concavity of the spring. For example, the spring may roll such that portions of the spring roll in on itself toward the concave side of the spring. The spring may also roll in the other direction such that the portion of the spring rolls in on itself toward the convex side of the spring. Metallic tapes may be cold-worked in their forming process to build up large internal pre-stresses. They may be stress-free in neither the rolled nor deployed states, thus releasing strain energy as they roll into a coil.
Exemplary systems may include a trigger system for triggering the tape from one configuration to another. The trigger system may include a device configured to apply a force to the tape spring at one or more strategic locations along the length of the tape spring. The trigger system may include an impact trigger such that the tape spring is impacted by another object. The trigger system may include a pincher such that the tape spring experiences pressure by the trigger system on one or both sides of the tape spring. Other trigger systems are contemplated herein that are configured to buckle the tape spring. Exemplary triggers may include coatings or material coverings that deform a cross section of the tape and/or impose a pressure or force on the tape. Exemplary embodiments may include material coatings, coverings, or integrated spring materials for triggering the retraction of the tape spring. For example, piezo electric or other materials may be used to locally deform or manipulate the tape spring to trigger a retraction upon application of an electrical signal.
Exemplary systems may include a deployment system for extending the tape spring from a rolled configuration to a linear configuration. Linear configuration includes the general extension of the tape spring in a single direction, with the understanding that the tape spring itself may include a curved surface. The deployment system may be configured to push or pull the tape spring through a mandrel to force the spring tape into its linear configuration. Other deployment systems may be used, such as a runner configured to straighten the tape spring as the runner is passed over or by or the tape spring is run through the runner.
Several variations on this basic composite component are within the scope of the present disclosure. For example, as seen in
An exemplary operational sequence includes any combination of the system approaching the target object; opening the housing/canister of the system; deploying the engagement device; rendezvous with the target object; engage the system to couple to the target object; deploy the deorbit engine; navigate using the coupled engine; deorbit the target object; recycle the engagement system.
In an exemplary mission operation according to embodiments described herein, the operation of embodiments of the system may include the host spacecraft that is carrying engagement and/or deorbit system having a level of rendezvous and proximity operations (RPO) capability to deliver the engagement system to the space debris. Exemplary embodiment may however use one or more engines associated with the engagement system to navigate the system to the space debris after separation from the host spacecraft and before engagement with the space debris.
When the system is appropriately positioned in a desired orientation and/or position relative to the space debris, the canister (housing) holding the engagement device is opened allowing the engagement device to be deployed. The canister is constructed of walls confining the tape springs and/or the surface/membrane. The canister may enclose the engagement system during time from final assembly until the deployment device is called on to engage with debris. Exemplary embodiments may be a self-contained and self-supported system that bolts, couples, or is a payload onto or of an existing host spacecraft. Exemplary embodiments also include highly integrated and coupled designs wherein the engagement system and/or its canister is part of the host spacecraft and is controlled and maintained directly by the host spacecraft subsystems.
Upon command, the engagement system deployment sequence is initiated. The tape springs are driven to their final position (full extension or less, depending on the debris). With an attached membrane spanning between the arms, the system may use the deployment of the tape spring arms to deploy the membrane as well. The membrane may be towed into position by the deployment of the tape springs and may be stretched between adjacent arms by the geometry of the structure.
After deployment, the engagement system may be positioned closer or relative to the debris (within the capture arc of the tape spring arms) and positioned for engagement. In an exemplary embodiment of an operational mission, a piece of space debris may be tumbling or moving with respect to the engagement device. In such a case, the system host vehicle could be made to match the rotation/motion rate of the debris there by minimizing the forces on the engagement system during capture. Alternatively, the debris could be left to move and the engagement of the system effectively connects the two elements and resisting loads are transmitted through the engagement device.
Upon command (either active or passive), the engagement device is actuated to capture the debris object. The command may be sent to a controller that initiates a programmed sequence of actuators to strategically deform the tape springs to cause them to revert to their low strain energy position/condition. These actuators can be as simple as a solenoid or pneumatic piston pressing on the curve of the tape spring to locally disturb the cross section curvature of the tape spring. When the cross section is disturbed, the tape spring will revert to the low-strain-energy condition. Simple solenoids could be replaced with solid state actuators (such as piezoelectric devices). Additionally or alternatively, strategic deformations may be made to the tape spring to cause it to buckle at prescribed locations.
When the engagement system is triggered, the actuators and/or strategic deformations cause the tape springs to revert to a low strain condition. This condition can be tailored to the application during manufacturing. The low strain condition may be curved in nature allowing the tape springs to fully engage and/or capture the debris. With a multi-armed system, the arms may be fired simultaneously and they could tow a membrane along with them to fully/partially encapsulate the debris object. The membranes can serve many purposes not the least of which is the containment of any ancillary debris made during the engagement and de-tumble of the debris.
In the event that the system misfires and does not engage with the debris as intended, it is possible to mechanically reel in the arms of the system and reset it for another try at engagement. It may also be possible to imagine using this feature to de-engage with the debris object that is captured. This would give the operator the opportunity to capture a piece of debris, move it to a new location, and then release it in a new position and/or capture another piece of debris.
The deorbit engine may be the device providing the drag or propulsion that causes the debris to lose orbital energy and eventually enter Earth's atmosphere. Exemplary engines may include any combination of: a ballute/balloon, vane sail, aerobrake, propulsion system, electrodynamic tethers, or other engines described herein or known to persons of skill in the art.
The SL-16 rocket bodies of interest have a cross sectional area of 4 m×10 m. To target a 10× decrease in deorbit time, the drag area may be increased by a factor of ten. The target size for the spherical balloon drag engine is 23 m in diameter. The target size for a sail is 20 m per side. Exemplary embodiments may also include sails that employ solar radiation pressure and drag pressure to reduce the overall size of the sail.
Active deorbit engines include electrodynamic tethers, traditional propulsion, and solar sails. These devices may need to know something about the position of the debris at all times that the device is active. The system may therefore be able to operate fully autonomously but may include onboard routine processing to make control decisions about the deorbit thrust.
Electrodynamic tethers produce thrust by producing a current in the presence of the Earth's magnetic field. The tether uses solar power to create an electric potential in the conductor (kilometers long tether). When this potential is supplied with electrons (ions) it produces a current that interacts (cross product) with the magnetic field to create a thrust.
Traditional propulsion systems may be used as a deorbit engine.
The vane sail is a novel system using four articulated solar sail vanes to create solar radiation pressure. With the articulation of the vanes, it is possible to meter and turn off the thrust produced by a solar sail. This modification allows for the use of solar sail in Earth orbit. The solar sail is particularly well suited to the deorbit mission because of its perpetual and propellantless operation. Although the four-vane configuration is disclosed, it is contemplated that other vane sail configurations may be used.
The vane sail may be a segmented and articulated solar sail that has unique operational capabilities that may be exploited for embodiments of the engagement device described herein. The vane sail for deorbit may be deployed to shape using a mechanical structure, such as STEM tubes. These mechanical struts may deploy the sail to its full area and provide structural integrity during operation. The vane sail illustrated in
Exemplary embodiments of the vane sail may be used to allow for the operation of solar sails in Earth orbit. By articulating the vanes individually or corporately, the thrust can be vectored and turned off. This allows the vane sail operator to strategically add or remove orbital energy at will. Solar radiation pressure thrust is very small but is perpetual and requires no consumables. Such a phenomenology is well suited to the challenge of debris removal and for high LEO orbits. The vane sail may include one or more solar panels to power the actuators for controlling the individual vane orientations.
Exemplary embodiments may include a multi-element satellite, such as described by U.S. Pat. No. 9,499,285, incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. The multi-element satellite may provide tomographic surveys of in situ space objects by fractionating a single vehicle into a physical multi-node structure connected by deployable booms. Once deployed on orbit, the multi-element satellite may be able to maneuver and rendezvous with the target satellite and then match its orientation and tumble rates by spinning up the structure. Any number of propulsion technologies can be employed from cold gas and solid propellant through to electric propulsion.
Passive devices may be deployed to shape and then work as drag devices without any control required for their entire life. These devices include inflatably deployed balloons/ballutes (sphere, torus, cone, stacked torus, prism, etc) and mechanically deployed drag areas like an aerobrake. The inflatable solutions may require exemplary embodiments of the systems described herein to carry makeup inflatant to deal with holing from debris and micrometeoroids. The mechanically deployed solutions may require more structural mass.
Most balloons and ballutes use inflatant pressurization to provide structure. These devices may require a supply of makeup gas to maintain the pressure inside the envelope to maintain structural integrity. It is also contemplated that a balloon/ballute may be built of sufficiently stiff material such that makeup gas is not required (the Echo balloons are examples of these). These types of envelopes are significantly heavier than their counterparts, but they may not need heavy makeup gas supply systems.
Mechanically deployed devices are erected and maintained to shape through the use of clever deployment mechanisms. Once to full shape the deployed surface area may be held in shape by the same mechanism that drove it to deploy originally. These devices can deploy two-dimensional surface areas (think of a disc vs. a sphere) and thereby reduce the total amount of material deployed. However, the structure to support the aero loads may require significant mass and stowed volume.
Although embodiments of this invention have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings, it is to be noted that various changes and modifications will become apparent to those skilled in the art. Such changes and modifications are to be understood as being included within the scope of embodiments of this invention as defined by the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/468,472, filed Sep. 7, 2021, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,713,141, which claims priority as a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/277,944, filed Feb. 15, 2019, now U.S. Pat. No. 11,142,349, which is a national stage of International Application Number PCT/US19/18346, filed Feb. 15, 2019, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/631,297, filed Feb. 15, 2018, which are incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3175619 | Reed, Jr. | Mar 1965 | A |
3354458 | Rottmayer | Nov 1967 | A |
3521290 | Bahiman et al. | Jul 1970 | A |
3780375 | Cummings et al. | Dec 1973 | A |
4033225 | Kartzmark, Jr. | Jul 1977 | A |
4092453 | Jonda | May 1978 | A |
4171876 | Wood | Oct 1979 | A |
4262867 | Piening | Apr 1981 | A |
4475323 | Schwartzberg et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4557083 | Zanardo | Dec 1985 | A |
4587777 | Vasques | May 1986 | A |
4647329 | Oono | Mar 1987 | A |
4745725 | Onoda | May 1988 | A |
4759517 | Clark | Jul 1988 | A |
4820170 | Redmond et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4852307 | Goudeau | Aug 1989 | A |
5042390 | Schotter | Aug 1991 | A |
5085018 | Kitamura et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5163262 | Adams | Nov 1992 | A |
5184444 | Warden | Feb 1993 | A |
5451975 | Miller | Sep 1995 | A |
5507451 | Karnish | Apr 1996 | A |
5615847 | Bourlett | Apr 1997 | A |
5680145 | Thomson et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5979833 | Eller | Nov 1999 | A |
6028570 | Gilger et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6260797 | Palmer | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6286410 | Leibolt | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6508036 | Cadogan | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6568640 | Barnett | May 2003 | B1 |
6640739 | Woodall | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6647668 | Choee et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6655637 | Robinson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6830222 | Nock | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6904722 | Brown | Jun 2005 | B2 |
7104507 | Knight | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7941978 | Pollard | May 2011 | B1 |
8056461 | Bossert | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8115149 | Manole | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8356774 | Banik et al. | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8511298 | Ven | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8770522 | Murphey | Jul 2014 | B1 |
9146043 | Pedretti | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9187191 | Jensen | Nov 2015 | B1 |
9296270 | Parks | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9499285 | Garber | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9666948 | Rao et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9742058 | O'Neil, Jr. | Aug 2017 | B1 |
9755318 | Mobrem | Sep 2017 | B2 |
9810820 | Starkovich | Nov 2017 | B1 |
9828772 | Murphey et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
10036878 | Greschik | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10347962 | Georgakopoulos | Jul 2019 | B1 |
10642011 | Greschik et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10651531 | Palisoc et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
11142349 | Barnes | Oct 2021 | B2 |
11316242 | Palisoc et al. | Apr 2022 | B2 |
11713141 | Barnes | Aug 2023 | B2 |
11870128 | Palisoc et al. | Jan 2024 | B2 |
11905044 | Barnes et al. | Feb 2024 | B2 |
11973258 | Bolisay | Apr 2024 | B2 |
20020112417 | Brown | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116877 | Breitbach | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030010869 | Kawaguchi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030010870 | Chafer | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030132543 | Gardner | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040085615 | Hill | May 2004 | A1 |
20040140402 | Wehner | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040194397 | Brown | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050103939 | Bischof | May 2005 | A1 |
20050104798 | Nolan et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050126106 | Murphy | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050168393 | Apostolos | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050209835 | Ih | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070008232 | Weinstein | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070145195 | Thomson | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080035798 | Kothera | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080228332 | Hindle | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090001219 | Golecki et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090002257 | de Jong | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090114271 | Stancel | May 2009 | A1 |
20090124743 | Lee | May 2009 | A1 |
20090294595 | Pellegrino | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100018026 | Bassily | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20110023484 | Lu | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110252716 | Pedretti | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120097799 | Stone | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120205488 | Powell | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120297717 | Keller et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120313569 | Curran | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130101845 | Hiel | Apr 2013 | A9 |
20130114155 | Eguro | May 2013 | A1 |
20130175401 | Starke | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130207881 | Fujii et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130292518 | Lagadec | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140030455 | Ruschulte | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140042275 | Abrams | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140099853 | Condon | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140151485 | Baudasse | Jun 2014 | A1 |
20150194733 | Mobrem | Jul 2015 | A1 |
20150336685 | Wan | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160046372 | Barnes et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160054097 | Sylvia | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160130020 | Chambert | May 2016 | A1 |
20160136820 | Lessing | May 2016 | A1 |
20160159475 | Schank | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160288453 | Mejia-Ariza | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160311558 | Turse | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160361910 | Franck, III | Dec 2016 | A1 |
20170058524 | Fernandez | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170310014 | Liu et al. | Oct 2017 | A1 |
20180257795 | Ellinghaus | Sep 2018 | A1 |
20190036221 | Muesse | Jan 2019 | A1 |
20190097300 | Palisoc | Mar 2019 | A1 |
20190144141 | Barnes | May 2019 | A1 |
20200130872 | Spencer | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20210159604 | Palisoc et al. | May 2021 | A1 |
20220181765 | Barnes et al. | Jun 2022 | A1 |
20220388694 | Barnes | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20220402632 | Yamamoto et al. | Dec 2022 | A1 |
20230155545 | Bolisay et al. | May 2023 | A1 |
20230399847 | Greschik et al. | Dec 2023 | A1 |
20240025568 | Barnes | Jan 2024 | A1 |
20240088539 | Palisoc et al. | Mar 2024 | A1 |
20240109265 | Palisoc et al. | Apr 2024 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
666235 | Jul 1988 | CH |
104393421 | Mar 2015 | CN |
204216229 | Mar 2015 | CN |
104691784 | Jun 2015 | CN |
106516164 | Mar 2017 | CN |
105480436 | Jul 2017 | CN |
106976571 | Jul 2017 | CN |
107150818 | Sep 2017 | CN |
111806723 | Nov 2021 | CN |
110371324 | Mar 2022 | CN |
112389683 | May 2022 | CN |
1456133 | Jun 1965 | DE |
3437824 | Apr 1986 | DE |
10147144 | Feb 2003 | DE |
102011082497 | Mar 2013 | DE |
524888 | Jan 1993 | EP |
3081842 | Dec 2019 | FR |
2322236 | Aug 1998 | GB |
60125003 | Jul 1985 | JP |
2004221897 | Aug 2004 | JP |
2014189145 | Oct 2014 | JP |
2016030486 | Mar 2016 | JP |
2018104250 | Jul 2018 | JP |
20120092933 | Jul 2012 | WO |
20150116280 | Aug 2015 | WO |
20170151689 | Sep 2017 | WO |
20200249900 | Dec 2020 | WO |
20210224572 | Nov 2021 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 20798150, dated Dec. 21, 2022, 9 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for PCT/US2021/72477 dated Mar. 25, 2022, 10 pages. |
International Search Report and Writen Opinion for PCT/US2022/079841 dated Mar. 10, 2023, 7 pages. |
Costanza et al., “Design and Characterization of a Small-Scale Solar Sail Deployed by NiTi Shape Memory Actuators”, Jun. 2016, Science Direct, All Pages (2016). |
K.Sonoda, “Materials Application for Spaceraft Use in Japan,” in IEEE Electrical Insulation Magazine, vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 18-26, Mar.-Apr. 1992, doi: 10.1109/57. 127012. (1992). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20240025568 A1 | Jan 2024 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62631297 | Feb 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17468472 | Sep 2021 | US |
Child | 18209960 | US | |
Parent | 16277944 | US | |
Child | 17468472 | US |