The present disclosure is directed spacecraft and, more particularly, to spacecraft propellant tank mount systems.
It is desirable to minimize the mass or weight (i.e., the force exerted on a mass by Earth's gravity) of a spacecraft. Each kilogram of spacecraft mass that is to be launched into Earth orbit may require as much as 10 kilograms of fuel. Accordingly, it is desirable to minimize spacecraft mass in order to reduce the overall cost and fuel requirements of a launch vehicle. Further, by reducing the mass of the spacecraft propulsion structure, more available spacecraft mass may be devoted to instrumentation and other spacecraft payload. One mechanism for reducing spacecraft mass is to eliminate any unnecessary structure from the spacecraft.
These considerations apply to spacecraft powered by electric propulsion systems, as well as to spacecraft that may employ chemical, or hybrid propulsion systems. Currently, spacecraft of the type having a central thrust tube design require internal propellant tanks that match the tube diameter to transfer launch loads to the cylindrical wall of the central thrust tube with minimal bending. A disadvantage with such a design is that it may require a custom tank design to match the inside diameter of the central thrust tube. Further, such a design may not work well with electric propulsion spacecraft because the size of the propellant tank required by a mission may be less than what would be required to fill the interior of the central thrust tube. Accordingly, there is a need for a spacecraft having a propellant tank mount that may be used in conjunction with a central thrust tube, but does not need to match the interior diameter of the central thrust tube.
The disclosure is directed to a spacecraft having a primary structural frame and a propellant tank, the spacecraft including a tank mount adapted to engage a portion of the propellant tank, the tank mount being configured to transfer launch loads directly from the propellant tank to the launch vehicle interface ring. In one aspect, the propellant tank mount includes a conical shell having a first end adapted to engage an end of a propellant tank, and a second end adapted to engage a launch vehicle interface ring. In another aspect, a method of mounting a propellant tank to a spacecraft having a primary structural frame includes providing a tank support adapted to engage a portion of the propellant tank, the tank support being configured to transfer launch loads directly from a propellant tank to a launch vehicle interface ring.
An advantage of embodiments of the disclosed spacecraft, propellant tank mount and method is that the propellant tank may be supported independently of the central thrust tube of the spacecraft. Consequently, the spacecraft and mount may accommodate propellant tanks of a variety of shapes and diameters. The shape and diameter of the propellant tank need not be dictated by the inside diameter of the central thrust tube. Another advantage of embodiments of the disclosed spacecraft, propellant tank mount and method is that the launch load of the propellant tank may be transferred directly from the propellant tank to the launch vehicle interface ring, and not borne by the central thrust tube of the spacecraft.
The disclosed design may provide a mass-efficient solution because the propellant tank load (i.e., the force exerted by the mass of the propellant tank during launch, and when the launch vehicle is accelerating, as a result of acceleration of the launch vehicle and spacecraft) may bypass the spacecraft's primary structure. This may enable use of a simplified and relatively lighter primary structure, so that a larger portion of the available mass of the spacecraft may be allotted to instrumentation and other spacecraft payload.
Other objects and advantages of the disclosed structure will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings and the appended claims.
As shown in
The thrusters 18 may be include an electric propulsion units connected to a propellant tank 22. In embodiments, the thrusters 18 may be gridded electrostatic ion thrusters, or Hall effect thrusters. The propellant tank 22 may contain xenon gas propellant under pressure and may be dimensioned to be spaced from the inner surface 24 of the central thrust tube 12. Although shown in
As shown in
At an opposite end of the propellant tank 22, the tank mount 26 may include a forward tank support panel 38. The forward tank support panel 38 may be disk-shaped and sized to engage the inner periphery 24 of the central thrust tube 12. The forward tank support panel 38 may be a solid disk, as shown, or may have voids to reduce weight. The forward tank support panel 38 may be attached to the propellant tank 22 by a pivotal mount 40, such as the monoball bearing axial slip joint shown. Other types of pivotal mounts may be employed. The forward tank support panel 38 may be attached to the inner periphery 24 of the central thrust tube 12 by welding, brazing, adhesives or other means.
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
The disclosed spacecraft 10, 10′ and tank mount 26, 26′ provide a low-cost mounting system that may transfer launch loads from the lower propellant tank nozzle 52 through the conical shell 34 and to the launch vehicle interface ring 36. Therefore, the launch load of the propellant tank 22 may be conveyed directly to the interface ring 36 without transferring a load to the central thrust tube 12. Because the connection between the propellant tank 22 and the forward tank support panel 38 is by way of a slip joint 40, there is not thrust load transmitted to the central thrust tube 12 at that location. Thus, the entire thrust load of the propellant tank may be borne by the interface ring 36 and not the structural frame of the spacecraft 12, 12′. Further, because the propellant tank is attached to the spacecraft 12, 12′ at its upper and lower ends by boss 42 and nozzle 56, the support system will accommodate a variety of propellant tank dimensions and diameters.
While the forms of apparatus and method described herein may constitute preferred embodiments of the spacecraft and propellant tank mount system, it is to be understood the invention is not limited to these precise forms of apparatus, and that changes may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3929306 | Faget et al. | Dec 1975 | A |
4829784 | Berg et al. | May 1989 | A |
5411226 | Jones et al. | May 1995 | A |
5529264 | Bedegrew et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5605308 | Quan et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5613653 | Bombled et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
6206327 | Benedetti et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6267330 | Cochran | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6357698 | DiVerde et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6789767 | Mueller et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
7658414 | Watanabe et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
8136765 | Geneste et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8196868 | Kutter et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8393582 | Kutter et al. | Mar 2013 | B1 |
20020179776 | Mueller et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20100264275 | Behruzi et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20120227374 | Zegler | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20130299641 | Aston et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20140061386 | Peterka et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
103448919 | Dec 2013 | CN |
2662289 | Nov 2013 | EP |
0156883 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
GB, Combined Search and Examination Report, Application No. GB1316482.7 (Apr. 4, 2014). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140103164 A1 | Apr 2014 | US |