Not Applicable
Not Applicable
The present invention relates generally to devices for use in orally dispensing medication using an inhaler. More specifically, the present invention relates to spacers used for facilitating the delivery to pediatric and breathing impaired patients of medication dispensed from an inhaler.
Medications are commonly dispensed from pressurized metered dose inhalers (MDI) to deliver the medication directly to the lungs of a patient. Spacers are used for transporting the medication from the spray outlet of the MDI to the patient's mouth. The spacer is intended to increase the effectiveness of drug delivery to the deep lung regions of the patient primarily by decelerating the drug spray before the spray enters the patient's mouth. The spacer will also reduce the size of spray droplets (by evaporation) and trap larger particles in the spacer. This will reduce the need for hand-breath coordination and allow for multiple breath inhalation therapy, thereby improving the overall delivery of the medication dose to the lung. These factors are particularly important when trying to effectively provide inhalation therapy to children and to patients with breathing impairments.
The quantity, size, and velocity of the drug particles that exit an inhalation spacer are affected by dynamic interactions between the spacer, spray properties, and airflow. Unfortunately, in conventional spacers, as much as 50% of the medication is lost before delivery to the patient because of inefficient design of the spacer itself. For example, high-pressure, recirculation zones are created near sharp corners in the spacer. These recirculation zones trap spray particles and provide increased time for particle deposition on the spacer walls such that they are not delivered to the patient. Also, while it is known that medication particles having a diameter in the range of 3–5 microns are desirable for delivery to deep lung tissue, conventional spacers do a poor job of consistently delivering particles of this size. This is because existing spacer designs do not effectively control the heat exchange rate and the length of time that the medication particles remain inside the spacer, factors which directly affect particle size. Finally, prior art spacers typically include air inlets at the upstream (spray discharge) end near the mouthpiece but they cannot maintain consistent flow energy. All of these factors will cause undesirable deposition of the medication droplets in the oro-pharyngeal region of the patient. The inefficient delivery of medication to the deep lung results in either under-medication of the patient or the waste of expensive medications.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,367,471 discloses an internal vortex mechanism for an inhaler device. More specifically, vortex generators positioned within the wall of the conduit and in fluid communication with air inlets for receiving ambient outside air, provide the inner wall of the conduit with a circumferential-swirling turbulent boundary layer flow to minimize impaction of the medication on the inner surfaces of the conduit. The inhaler device shown in
U.S. Patent Application Publication 2002/0121275 discloses an aerosol enhancement device. More specifically, the aerosol enhancement device displayed in
U.S. Pat. No. 6,234,169 discloses an inhaler. The inhaler provides a conduit defining an air flow path extending between the first end and the second end and an orifice in the chamber between the first end and the second end, the orifice utilizing the Coanda Effect when the reservoir is in air flow communication with the chamber and upon inhalation by the individual to draw medication from the reservoir. As seen in
What is needed, then, is a spacer and method of use thereof for the efficient delivery of medication from a metered dose inhaler, through the spacer, and into the patient. Such a spacer would be easy to use and substantially improve the delivery of medication to the patient's lungs.
The design of the spacer of the present invention effectively channels the spray down the centerline of the spacer and limits contact between medication particles and the walls of the spacer (deposition). Further, the spacer of this invention minimizes the formation of any adverse recirculation zones that trap medication particles within the spacer. Rather, by a careful and novel design, the present invention creates and takes advantage of high-pressure recirculation zones that tend to force the medication spray away from the walls of the spacer and into a preferred, central spray pattern. Consequently, the spacer of the present invention delivers a higher percentage of the medication to the deep lung regions of the patient.
To accomplish this, one embodiment of the spacer of the present invention includes a first conical body joined to a second conical body, forming a continuous spray conduit through first and second internal chambers of the respective first and second conical bodies. A mouthpiece is formed in the small diameter (proximal, downstream) end of the first conical body. A spray inlet for attachment to an MDI or similar device is formed at the large diameter (distal, upstream) end of the second conical body. A plurality of air inlets are placed downstream of the medication inlet proximate to, or in, the large diameter distal end surface of the first conical body. During use, high-pressure air recirculation zones are created in the first and second chambers, near the spray inlet and the air inlets, and an air jacket is created along the inner surface of the wall of the first conical body. This forces the medication spray through the spacer into a defined airflow path through the spray conduit, minimizing particle entrapment and contact with the walls of the spacer.
In one embodiment of the spacer a unidirectional valve is provided proximate the mouthpiece. In another embodiment, the spacer is provided with at least one conical body that is collapsible, so that the spacer will occupy less storage space when not in use.
a), (b) and (c) are rear views showing different geometries of the alternate embodiment adapter of
Referring to
Looking more particularly at
Briefly, the method of providing an inhaled medication to the deep lung of a pediatric or breathing impaired patient includes dispensing a medication spray into the spray inlet 14 of a spacer 10, controlling the spray path 21 in the spacer 10 at least in part by creating recirculation zones 19 downstream of the spray inlet 14 so that only a minimal amount of the medication contacts the interior surfaces of the spacer 10.
As more particularly shown in
As shown in
The spacer 10 may be constructed of any biologically inert material which is suitable for the intended function. Examples of the types of materials that may be used for the construction of the spacer include plastic, rubber, and light metal Some of the preferred materials are Polypropylene and PMMA (preferably additionally treated with permanent electrostatic discharge protection) and anodized metals (for example, aluminum) for the body. Silicone rubber may be used for the valve and the adapter. The spacer 10 may be manufactured as a single integral piece, or in multiple parts which may then be bonded or removably attached for use.
As noted above, the geometry of the spacer 10 and the downstream air inlets 26 cooperate to generate one or more recirculation zones 19 inside the chambers 116, 118 when the medication spray enters the spacer 10. The recirculation zones 19 provide two benefits. First, they reduce undesirable contact between the medication particles and the walls of the spacer 10. Second, they tend to constrain the spray to a defined spray path 21 (
Modifications to the location, size, number, and shape of the air inlets 26 impact the generation and function of the recirculation zones 19. Additionally, the shapes of the first chamber 116 and second chamber 118 are also involved in determining the functionality of the recirculation zones 19. Accordingly, the air inlets 26 and the shapes of the chambers 116, 118 have a critical impact upon the amount of medication which impacts the walls of the spacer 10 and is not available for inhalation by the patient. Although this invention is not bound by mechanism or theory, high pressure recirculation zones are generated by the propulsion of the medication spray into the spacer 10 in combination with the air which enters the spacer 10 through the air inlets 26 and the number and geometry of the chambers of the spacer 10. Computer simulation techniques based on principles of computational fluid dynamics may be used to optimize chamber and air inlet geometries.
For example, certain physical embodiments of the spacer 10 of the present invention can effectively utilize high-pressure recirculation zones an dair inflow energy to increase the efficacy of drug delivery to the deep lung as compared to conventional spacers, while maintaining drug particle sizes in the desired range of 3.0 to 5.0 microns. Accordingly, in certain embodiments of the spacer 10, the first conical body will have an axial length of approximately 80 mm, a small (proximal end) diameter of approximately 1 mm, and a large (distal end) diameter of approximately 22 mm. The second conical body will have an axial length of approximately 40 mm and the size of the proximal and distal ends are similar to the first conical chamber. In this embodiment, two rectangular (oblong) air inlets 26 having a diameter of approximately 1 mm are evenly distributed about the distal end surface 22 of the first conical body 16.
Referring now to
a)–(c) illustrate different embodiments of the opening 52 of the adapter 50. The opening 52 may be octagonal (c), circular (b), or oblong (a). The opening 52 forms an air-tight seal between the adapter 50 and the medication dispenser 38.
As shown in
The one-way valve 36 may be a tri-leaflet valve as shown in
As shown by performance testing, the spacer 10 of the present invention provides improved results with regard to the delivery of medication as compared to other commercially available spacers. As shown in
Although a preferred embodiment of the spacer has been described as having first and second bodies or chambers with a conical geometry, the spacer 10 can also be configured with elliptical bodies or oblong bodies.
Thus, although there have been described particular embodiments of the present invention of a new and useful “Spacer for Delivery of Medications from an Inhaler to Children and Breathing Impaired Patients” it is not intended that such references be construed as limitations upon the scope of this invention except as set forth in the following claims.
Work on this invention was performed under NIH Grant R44HL64500-03 titled “Development of an Improved Pediatric Spacer for Inhalers” during the period May 2000 through November 2000 and from October 2002 through the date of filing. Accordingly, the U.S. Government may have rights in the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
D34779 | McPherson | Jul 1901 | S |
4174712 | Moren et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4222126 | Boretos et al. | Sep 1980 | A |
4470412 | Nowacki et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
4484577 | Sackner et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
4706663 | Makiej | Nov 1987 | A |
4790305 | Zoltan et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
5007419 | Weinstein et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5012803 | Foley et al. | May 1991 | A |
5042467 | Foley | Aug 1991 | A |
5178138 | Walstrom et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5203323 | Tritle | Apr 1993 | A |
5297543 | Larson et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5385140 | Smith | Jan 1995 | A |
5427089 | Kraemer | Jun 1995 | A |
D362500 | Cook et al. | Sep 1995 | S |
5477849 | Fry | Dec 1995 | A |
D373630 | Berg et al. | Sep 1996 | S |
D380663 | Nakamura | Jul 1997 | S |
5645049 | Foley et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5699789 | Hendricks | Dec 1997 | A |
5724962 | Vidgren et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
D394313 | O'Brien | May 1998 | S |
5775320 | Patton et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5809996 | Alldredge | Sep 1998 | A |
5816240 | Komesaroff | Oct 1998 | A |
5839430 | Cama | Nov 1998 | A |
5848588 | Foley et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5875776 | Vaghefi | Mar 1999 | A |
5899201 | Schultz et al. | May 1999 | A |
D412979 | Weinstein et al. | Aug 1999 | S |
5938118 | Cooper | Aug 1999 | A |
D416621 | Forssell et al. | Nov 1999 | S |
5983893 | Wetterlin | Nov 1999 | A |
5988160 | Foley et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
D420736 | Moulin | Feb 2000 | S |
6026807 | Puderbaugh et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6039042 | Sladek | Mar 2000 | A |
D422884 | Lafond | Apr 2000 | S |
D428486 | Schuckmann | Jul 2000 | S |
D435212 | Philippe | Dec 2000 | S |
6202643 | Sladek | Mar 2001 | B1 |
D442685 | Sladak | May 2001 | S |
6234169 | Bulbrook et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6293279 | Schmidt et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
D450117 | Braithwaite et al. | Nov 2001 | S |
D452910 | Braithwaite et al. | Jan 2002 | S |
6336455 | Howlett | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6347629 | Braithwaite | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6363932 | Forchione et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6367471 | Genosar et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6435176 | Berg et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6595206 | Vito | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6615826 | Gabrio et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
20020121275 | Johnson et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030029447 | Vito | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040094148 | Lulla et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050172955 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |