The present application is the U.S. national stage entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/EP2014/076739, filed internationally on Dec. 5, 2014, which, in turn, claims priority to European Patent Application No. 13196865.3, filed on Dec. 12, 2013.
The invention relates to a spacer with an extruded profiled seal, a method for its production, and its use.
The thermal conductivity of glass is lower by roughly a factor of 2 to 3 than that of concrete or similar building materials. However, since, in most cases, panes are designed significantly thinner than comparable elements made of brick or concrete, buildings frequently lose the greatest share of heat via external glazing. This effect is particularly significant in high-rise buildings with partial or complete glass façades. The increased costs necessary for heating and air-conditioning systems make up a part of the maintenance costs of the building that must not be underestimated. Moreover, as a consequence of more stringent construction regulations, lower carbon dioxide emissions are required. An important approach to a solution for this involves insulating glazing units, without which, primarily as a result of increasingly rapidly rising prices of raw materials and more stringent environmental protection constraints, it is no longer possible to imagine the building construction sector.
Insulating glazing units are manufactured from at least two panes that are connected to each other via at least one circumferential spacer. Depending on the embodiment, the interpane space between the two panes, referred to as the “glazing interior”, is filled with air or gas, but in any case free of moisture. An excessive moisture content in the interpane space of the glazing results, in particular in the case of cold exterior temperatures, in the condensation of drops of water in the interpane space, which absolutely must be avoided. To absorb the residual moisture remaining in the system after assembly, hollow body spacers filled with a desiccant can, for example, be used. However, since the absorption capacity of the desiccant is limited, even in this case, the sealing of the system is of enormous importance to prevent the penetration of additional moisture. In the case of gas-filled insulating glazing units, into whose glazing interior an argon filling, for example, is introduced, gas tightness must also be ensured.
In order to ensure improved leak tightness of insulating glazing units, greatly varied modifications in the field of the spacers are already known. Already in DE 40 24 697 A1, the problem is discussed that customary single or double sealed insulating glass edge bonds made of materials such as polysulfide polymers, butyl hot melt, silicone rubber, polymercaptan, or polyurethane cannot ensure long-term adequate sealing and, over time, an undesirable gas exchange between the glazing interior and the environment occurs. Improved sealing is accomplished according to DE 40 24 697 A1 by means of a modification of the spacer, onto whose pane contact surfaces polyvinylidene chloride films or coatings are applied.
Another measure for improving the leak tightness of insulating glazing units is the coating of polymeric spacers with metal foils or alternating metal polymer layer systems, as disclosed, for example, in EP 0 852 280 A1 and WO 2013/104507 A1. These ensure high leak tightness of the spacer with simultaneous compatibility with the sealing materials used for assembly.
Despite these improvements in the field of spacers, leak tightness problems upon failure of the sealant between spacers and adjacent panes persist. According to the prior art, only this sealant is watering gas impermeable, whereas the outer seal of the insulating glazing unit is accomplished with materials such as silicon or polysulfide, which have very good adhesion properties but are water and gas permeable. The outer seal thus serves primarily for mechanical stability of the glazing unit. Accordingly, a defect of the sealant between the spacers and the panes results in complete failure of the insulating glazing unit. Even the prior improvements in the field of spacers, such as coated polymeric spacers, do not help since the coating seals only the spacer itself but not the glazing interior.
The object of the present invention is to provide a spacer, which results in improved sealing of insulating glazing units, an insulating glazing unit with this spacer, as well as an economical method for producing the insulating glazing unit.
The object of the present invention is accomplished according to the invention by a spacer, an insulating glazing unit with a spacer, a method for its production, and the use of the spacer according to independent claims 1, 9, 14, and 15. Preferred embodiments of the invention emerge from the subclaims.
The spacer according to the invention for insulating glazing units comprises at least a polymeric main body and an extruded profiled seal. The polymeric main body comprises two pane contact surfaces, a glazing interior surface, and an outer surface, with the extruded profiled seal applied on the outer surface of the polymeric main body. As a result of the fact that the main body and the profiled seal are coextruded, the extruded profiled seal is formed in one piece with the polymeric main body. This is particularly advantageous since the profiled seal does not have to be introduced in a separate step in the glazing plant, but, instead, the component made up of the main body and the profiled seal is already available in ready to install form. This saves time in the production process as a result of which production costs can be reduced. Since the spacer according to the invention is produced independent of the insulating glazing unit assembly line and no modifications of the production plant are required for installation of the spacer, the spacer according to the invention is universally usable without added expense. Moreover, the extruded profiled seal ensures reliable and durable sealing of the outer surface of the spacer.
Films for sealing the spacer, as known in the prior art, are, as a rule, fixed on the spacer using an adhesive, with an adhesive failure due to aging of the adhesive possibly resulting in leaks of the spacer. The coextruded spacer according to the invention is formed in one piece such that adhesive bonding is eliminated and such a failure can be avoided.
The spacer according to the invention includes, in a preferred embodiment, no additional polymeric or metallic layers, such as an insulating film, on its exterior. This is particularly advantageous since the production of the spacer according to the invention is substantially simpler and more cost-effective than coating with an insulating film, especially than coating with an insulating film with alternating metallic and polymeric layers, as is used according to the prior art in order to ensure adequate leak tightness.
The extruded profiled seal preferably protrudes laterally beyond the pane contact surfaces of the spacer. Particularly preferably, the extruded profiled seal protrudes by 0.1 mm to 2 mm, preferably 0.5 mm to 1 mm, beyond the first pane contact surface and/or the second pane contact surface. Thus, after installation of the spacer, the extruded profiled seal makes contact with the adjacent panes of the insulating glazing unit and seals the glazing interior. In order to ensure uniform centering of the spacer in the interpane space, the extruded profiled seal protrudes, preferably on the two pane contact surfaces, by the same amount beyond the polymeric main body. As a result of the flexibility of the extruded profiled seal, precisely fitted installation as well as accurate sealing are possible. Insulating films known in the prior art that are applied on the spacer cannot provide such sealing.
The two pane contact surfaces of the polymeric main body comprise a first pane contact surface and a second pane contact surface. The first pane contact surface and the second pane contact surface are the sides of the main body, onto which, at the time of installation of the spacer, the fixing of the panes (first pane and second pane) of an insulating glazing unit is done. The first pane contact surface and the second pane contact surface run parallel to each other.
The glazing interior surface is defined as the surface of the polymeric main body that faces in the direction of the interior of the glazing after installation of the spacer in an insulating glazing unit. The glazing interior surface is between the panes mounted on the spacer.
The outer surface of the polymeric main body is the side opposite the glazing interior surface, which faces away from the interior of the insulating glazing unit in the direction of an external interpane space. The outer surface preferably runs perpendicular to the pane contact surfaces. However, the outer surface nearest the pane contact surfaces can, alternatively, be inclined at an angle of preferably 30° to 60° relative to the outer surface in the direction of the pane contact surfaces. This angled geometry improves the stability of the polymeric main body. A planar outer surface, which remains perpendicular to the pane contact surfaces over its entire course has, in contrast, the advantage that the sealing surface between spacers and pane contact surfaces is maximized and simpler shaping facilitates the production process.
The spacer preferably has, along the pane contact surfaces, a height of 5 mm to 15 mm, particularly preferably of 5 mm to 10 mm.
The width of the glazing interior surface, which defines the distance between the first pane and the second pane, is 4 mm to 30 mm, preferably 8 mm to 16 mm.
The profiled seal extruded on the outer surface of the polymeric main body contains butyl rubber, polyisobutylene, polyethylene vinyl alcohol, ethylene vinyl acetate, polyolefin rubber, polypropylene, polyethylene, copolymers, and/or mixtures thereof. These materials are particularly advantageous since they are gas- and watertight and the polymeric main body as well as the glazing interior are thus sealed against the entry of atmospheric moisture as well as the escape of a filling gas (if present).
In a preferred embodiment, the penetration index of the extruded profiled seal is between 20 and 40, particularly preferably between 30 and 40. All data used here refer to the penetration index per ISO 2137-DIN 5180 measured at a temperature of 60° C. The penetration index is a measure of the hardness of the material. Accordingly, a material with a small penetration index is harder than a material with a large penetration index. Here, the selection of a harder material for producing the extruded profiled seal is particularly advantageous in order to achieve a reliable seal even at high temperatures. Soft materials with high penetration indices start to flow in the case of strong heating, as a result of which the individual components of the insulating glazing unit can shift relative to each other and/or a failure of the seal can occur. Through the use of a harder sealant material, this is prevented.
The thickness of the extruded profiled seal is 0.5 mm to 5 mm, preferably 1 mm to 2 mm.
The polymeric main body contains polyethylene (PE), polycarbonates (PC), polypropylene (PP), polystyrene, polybutadiene, polynitriles, polyesters, polyurethanes, polymethyl methacrylates, polyacrylates, polyamides, polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polybutylene terephthalate (PBT), preferably acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), acrylonitrile styrene acrylester (ASA), acrylonitrile butadiene styrene/polycarbonate (ABS/PC), styrene acrylonitrile (SAN), PET/PC, PBT/PC, and/or copolymers or mixtures thereof.
Preferably, the polymeric main body is glass fiber reinforced. By means of the selection of the glass fiber content in the main body, the coefficient of thermal expansion of the main body can be varied and adapted. Through adaptation of the coefficient of thermal expansion of the polymeric main body and of the extruded profiled seal, temperature-related stresses between the various materials and flaking of the extruded profiled seal can be prevented. This is the case particularly with hard materials with a low penetration index, such as, for example, polypropylene or polyethylene. The main body preferably has a glass fiber content of 20% to 50%, particularly preferably of 30% to 40%. The glass fiber content in the polymeric main body simultaneously improves strength and stability.
Preferably, the polymeric main body is designed as a hollow profile, with, on the one hand, a weight reduction compared to a solidly formed spacer being possible, and, on the other, a hollow chamber being available in the interior of the main body to accommodate additional components, such as, a desiccant.
In a preferred embodiment, the glazing interior surface has at least one opening. Preferably, a plurality of openings are made. The total number of openings depends on the size of the insulating glazing unit. The openings connect the hollow chamber to the interpane space, as a result of which a gas exchange is possible therebetween. This enables absorption of atmospheric moisture by a desiccant situated in the hollow chambers and thus prevents fogging of the pane. The openings are preferably implemented as slits, particularly preferably as slits with a width of 0.2 mm and a length of 2 mm. The slits ensure optimal air exchange without the desiccant being able to penetrate out of the hollow chambers into the interpane spaces.
The polymeric main body preferably contains a desiccant, preferably silica gels, molecular sieves, CaCl2, Na2SO4, activated carbon, silicates, bentonites, zeolites, and/or mixtures thereof. The desiccant is preferably incorporated into the main body. The desiccant is particularly preferably situated in the hollow chamber of the main body.
The invention further includes an insulating glazing unit with a spacer according to the invention. The insulating glazing unit comprises at least one first pane, a second pane, and a circumferential spacer according to the invention surrounding the panes. The glazing interior of the insulating glazing unit is situated adjacent the glazing interior surface of the spacer. On the other hand, the outer surface of the spacer, on which the extruded profiled seal is fixed, is adjacent the external interpane space. The first pane fixed on the first pane contact surface of the spacer and the second pane on the second contact surface of the spacer.
The two panes are fixed on the pane contact surfaces preferably via a sealant, which is applied between the first pane contact surface and the first pane and/or the second pane contact surface and the second pane.
The sealant preferably contains butyl rubber, polyisobutylene, polyethylene vinyl alcohol, ethylene vinyl acetate, polyolefin rubber, polypropylene, polyethylene, copolymers, and/or mixtures thereof. The sealant is gas- and watertight such that the glazing interior is sealed against the entry of atmospheric moisture as well as the escape of a filling gas (if present).
The sealant is preferably introduced with a thickness of 0.1 mm to 0.8 mm, particularly preferably 0.2 mm to 0.4 mm into the gap between the spacer and the panes.
The external interpane space of the insulating glazing unit is preferably filled with an outer seal. This outer seal serves mainly for the bonding of the two panes and thus for the mechanical stability of the insulating glazing unit.
The outer seal preferably contains polysulfides, silicones, silicone rubber, polyurethanes, polyacrylates, copolymers, and/or mixtures thereof. Such materials have very good adhesion on glass such that the outer seal ensures reliable bonding of the panes.
The thickness of the outer seal is preferably 2 mm to 30 mm, particularly preferably 5 mm to 10 mm.
The insulating glazing unit according to the invention thus includes a triple sealing of the glazing interior consisting of the sealant between the spacer and panes as a primary sealant, the extruded profiled seal on the spacer as a secondary sealant, and the outer seal as a tertiary sealant. An insulating glazing unit according to the prior art includes, in contrast, only one sealant between the spacer and the panes as well as an outer seal and is thus only doubly sealed. However, the outer seal is not a barrier to gases and water vapor such that the seal of a known insulating glazing unit according to the prior art fails completely as soon as the sealant between the spacer and panes has a leak. Even when a spacer according to the prior art additionally includes an insulating film on the exterior of the polymeric main body, this only serves for sealing the spacer and does not contribute to the sealing of the glazing interior. In contrast, the extruded profiled seal of the spacer according to the invention contacts the panes of the insulating glazing unit such that the glazing interior is additionally sealed. Thus, the insulating glazing unit according to the invention has redundant sealing of the glazing interior. In the event of a possible failure of the sealant between the spacer and the panes or a leak of the spacer, the error-free functioning of the insulating glazing unit is thus still ensured. By this means, the service life of the insulating glazing unit according to the invention can be substantially improved compared to the systems known according to the prior art.
The sealant between the spacer and panes has a penetration index of 45 to 100, preferably 50 to 70. The selection of such a soft sealant is, among other things, advantageous in processing. To that end, a strand of the sealant is applied on the pane contact surfaces of the spacer and pressed with the panes. The sealant fills the gap between the panes and the spacer over its entire area. This can be achieved only through the selection of a soft material. Since soft materials with high penetration indices start to flow in the event of strong heating, the individual components of the insulating glazing unit can shift relative to each other and/or a failure of the seal can occur. However, even if the sealant fails, the spacer according to the invention remains fixed in its position by the secondary sealant and the glazing interior remains sealed. Accordingly, the combination of a sealant with a high penetration index and an extruded profiled seal with a lower penetration index enables particularly reliable redundant sealing that withstands even strong heating.
The glazing interior of the insulating glazing unit is preferably filled with a protective gas, preferably with a noble gas, preferably argon or krypton, which reduce the heat transfer value in the insulating glazing unit interpane space.
In a possible embodiment, the insulating glazing unit includes more than two panes.
In that case, for example, a third pane, for example, can be fixed in or on the spacer between the first pane and the second pane. In this embodiment, only a single spacer is used, which bears an extruded profile seal on its exterior.
Alternatively, a plurality of spacers can also be used. In this case, an additional spacer is fixed on the first pane and/or the second pane parallel to the spacer situated between the first and second pane. According to this embodiment, the insulating glazing unit has a plurality of spacers according to the invention with an extruded profiled seal.
The first pane and the second pane of the insulating glazing unit contain glass and/or polymers, preferably quartz glass, borosilicate glass, soda lime glass, polymethyl methacrylate, and/or mixtures thereof. Possible additional panes likewise include these materials, with the composition of the panes also possibly being different.
The panes of the insulating glazing unit according to the invention have a thickness of 1 mm to 50 mm, preferably 3 mm to 16 mm, particularly preferably 3 mm to 10 mm, with the two panes also possibly having different thicknesses.
At the corners of the insulating glazing unit, two spacers provided with a miter cut abut. According to the prior art, these are linked via corner connectors with a gasket to obtain sealing of the frame. Since the spacer according to the invention has an extruded profiled seal, the additional use of corner connectors is unnecessary. The extruded profiled seals of the adjacent spacers have strong reciprocal adhesion such that the extruded profiled seals bond to each other at the abutment site. This yields adequate sealing of the spacer frame profile even without additional measures such as corner connectors.
In the event that redundant sealing is also desired in the region of the corners, in another embodiment, the corners of the insulating glazing unit can be additionally equipped with corner connectors to ensure additional reliability. Alternatively, the corners can also be molded with an additional butyl gasket for this purpose.
Corner connectors can, for example, be implemented as molded plastic parts with a gasket, wherein two spacers provided with a miter cut abut. The corner connectors likewise include, according to the prior art, a gasket which is pressed together at the time of assembly of the individual parts and thus sealed.
In principle, extremely varied geometries of the insulating glazing unit are possible, for example, rectangular, trapezoidal, and rounded shapes. To produce round geometries, the spacer can, for example, be bent in a heated state.
Any abutment sites of the spacer frame profile are, as already discussed for corner connectors, likewise adequately sealed via the extruded profiled seal of the spacer according to the invention. Redundant sealing can also be done at these abutment sites, for example, by molding the abutment sites with an additional butyl gasket.
The invention further includes a method for producing an insulating glazing unit according to the invention comprising the steps:
In step b), the sealant is applied preferably as a strand, for example, with a diameter of 1 mm to 2 mm, on the pane contact surfaces. At the time of the pressing of the pane arrangement, this strand is uniformly distributed in the gap between the pane contact surface and the adjacent pane, resulting in the sealing of the gap.
In step d), the outer seal is preferably extruded directly into the external interpane space.
Preferably, the glazing interior between the panes is filled with a protective gas before the pressing of the arrangement (step c)).
The invention further includes the use of a spacer according to the invention in multiple glazings, preferably in insulating glazing units, particularly preferably in double or triple insulating glazing units. Use in combination with other elements, such as lighting elements, heating elements, antenna elements, or electrically switchable glazings, such as displays or electrochromic glazings, is also possible. In such glazings, a power supply is required in the glazing interior such that an electric conductor, such as a connection element, protrudes from the external interpane space into the glazing interior. In a possible embodiment, the insulating glazing unit has a connection element whose outer end protrudes out of the outer seal and is electrically contactable there and whose inner end contacts the electrically switchable element in the glazing interior. The connection element penetrates through the outer seal, runs between between the extruded profiled seal of the spacer contacting the pane and the adjacent pane and penetrates through the sealant between the pane contact surface and the adjacent pane.
In the following, the invention is explained in detail with reference to drawings. The drawings are purely schematic and not true to scale. They in no way restrict the invention. They depict:
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
13196865 | Dec 2013 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2014/076739 | 12/5/2014 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2015/086459 | 6/18/2015 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2094381 | Games | Sep 1937 | A |
2303897 | Smith | Dec 1942 | A |
2834999 | Taylor et al. | May 1958 | A |
3168089 | Larkin | Feb 1965 | A |
3793276 | Blunt et al. | Feb 1974 | A |
3935683 | Derner et al. | Feb 1976 | A |
3998680 | Flint | Dec 1976 | A |
4080482 | Lacombe | Mar 1978 | A |
4109431 | Mazzoni et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
4198254 | Laroche et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4226063 | Chenel | Oct 1980 | A |
4479988 | Dawson | Oct 1984 | A |
4613530 | Hood et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4658553 | Shinagawa | Apr 1987 | A |
4799745 | Meyer et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4831799 | Glover et al. | May 1989 | A |
5007217 | Glover et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5071206 | Hood et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5079054 | Davies | Jan 1992 | A |
5125195 | Brede | Jun 1992 | A |
5173800 | King | Dec 1992 | A |
5209034 | Box et al. | May 1993 | A |
5270092 | Griffith et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5290611 | Taylor et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5302425 | Taylor | Apr 1994 | A |
5313762 | Guillemet | May 1994 | A |
5424111 | Farbstein | Jun 1995 | A |
5439716 | Larsen | Aug 1995 | A |
5460862 | Roller | Oct 1995 | A |
5512341 | Newby et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5655282 | Hodek et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5679419 | Larsen | Oct 1997 | A |
5759665 | Lafond | Jun 1998 | A |
5773135 | Lafond | Jun 1998 | A |
5851627 | Farbstein | Dec 1998 | A |
5962090 | Trautz | Oct 1999 | A |
6001453 | Lafond | Dec 1999 | A |
6002521 | Town | Dec 1999 | A |
6060178 | Krisko | May 2000 | A |
6061994 | Goer et al. | May 2000 | A |
6115989 | Boone et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6223414 | Hodek et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6250045 | Goer et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6250245 | Robinson et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6266940 | Reichert | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6339909 | Brunnhofer et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6351923 | Peterson | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6389779 | Brunnhop | May 2002 | B1 |
6391400 | Russell et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6457294 | Virnelson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6503617 | Jacobsen et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6528131 | Lafond | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537629 | Ensinger | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6613404 | Johnson | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6796102 | Virnelson et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6989188 | Brunnhofer | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7317280 | Qiu et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7827760 | Brunnhofer et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7858193 | Ihlo et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7997037 | Crandell et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8453415 | Brunnhofer et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8484912 | Engelmeyer | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8640406 | Brunnhofer et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
9085708 | Becker et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9260906 | Schreiber | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9487994 | Lenz et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
20010001357 | Reichert | May 2001 | A1 |
20020192473 | Gentilhomme et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030074859 | Reichert et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040028953 | Kraemling | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040076815 | Reichert | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040163347 | Hodek et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040256978 | Yu et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050034386 | Crandell et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050100691 | Bunnhofer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050170161 | Ramchandra et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050214487 | Trautz | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050287370 | Kaczmarek et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060003138 | Kaczmarek et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060130427 | Hodek et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060150577 | Hodek et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060162281 | Pettit et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060260227 | Winfield | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070087140 | Dierks | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070122572 | Shibuya et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070251180 | Gosling et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261358 | Davis et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070261795 | Rosskamp et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080053037 | Gallagher | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080134596 | Brunnhofer et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20090120019 | Trpkovski | May 2009 | A1 |
20090120035 | Trpkovski | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139165 | Prete et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090186213 | Ihlo et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090197077 | Reutler et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090243802 | Wolf et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090301637 | Reichert | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100011703 | Seele et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100107529 | Engelmeyer | May 2010 | A1 |
20110041427 | Bouesnard | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110275796 | Seilz et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20120141699 | Mader | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120192946 | Becker et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120297707 | Lenz et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120297708 | Brunnhofer et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130079446 | Becker et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20140272207 | McKenna et al. | Sep 2014 | A1 |
20140311065 | Schreiber | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140356557 | Reichert | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20150107167 | Baumann et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20160069123 | Schreiber | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160201381 | Kuster et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160290032 | Kuster et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20160290033 | Messere | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170145734 | Kuster et al. | May 2017 | A1 |
20170152701 | Kuster et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20180058139 | Schwerdt et al. | Mar 2018 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2275448 | Jul 1998 | CA |
1377329 | Oct 2002 | CN |
1678810 | Oct 2005 | CN |
2555384 | Mar 1982 | DE |
3302659 | Aug 1984 | DE |
2752542 | Oct 1989 | DE |
40 24 697 | Feb 1992 | DE |
9408794 | Oct 1995 | DE |
19533685 | Mar 1997 | DE |
19602455 | Jul 1997 | DE |
19625845 | Jan 1998 | DE |
198 05 348 | Aug 1999 | DE |
198 07 454 | Aug 1999 | DE |
69607473 | Sep 2000 | DE |
19927683 | Jan 2001 | DE |
10025321 | Jan 2002 | DE |
10356216 | Jul 2005 | DE |
69633132 | Aug 2005 | DE |
102009006062 | Jul 2010 | DE |
102009057156 | Jun 2011 | DE |
102010006127 | Aug 2011 | DE |
20 2012 104026 | Oct 2013 | DE |
0078530 | May 1983 | EP |
0154428 | Sep 1985 | EP |
0261923 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0430889 | Jun 1991 | EP |
0 852 280 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0865560 | Aug 2004 | EP |
1607216 | Dec 2005 | EP |
1607217 | Dec 2005 | EP |
0912455 | May 2006 | EP |
1892365 | Feb 2008 | EP |
1218307 | Jul 2008 | EP |
1917222 | Mar 2009 | EP |
2218862 | Aug 2010 | EP |
2270307 | Jan 2011 | EP |
2 363 565 | Sep 2011 | EP |
2420536 | Feb 2012 | EP |
2584135 | Apr 2013 | EP |
2628884 | Aug 2013 | EP |
2802726 | Apr 2016 | EP |
2205620 | May 1974 | FR |
2799005 | Mar 2001 | FR |
2103999 | Mar 1983 | GB |
2210899 | Jun 1989 | GB |
H09175843 | Jul 1997 | JP |
H11189439 | Jul 1999 | JP |
2008-019131 | Jan 2008 | JP |
9748649 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9828513 | Jul 1998 | WO |
0116046 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2004005783 | Jan 2004 | WO |
2007042688 | Apr 2007 | WO |
2007101964 | Sep 2007 | WO |
2008022877 | Feb 2008 | WO |
2010034781 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010115456 | Oct 2010 | WO |
2011088994 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2012095266 | Jul 2012 | WO |
2012140005 | Oct 2012 | WO |
2013104507 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2014198429 | Dec 2014 | WO |
2014198431 | Dec 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Amcor “Ceramis Coating Technology” Oct. 2012, available at http://www.amcor.com/CMSPages/GetFile.aspx?guid=dbab33c8-3471-4e86-aa69-57dc76b525c1. 12 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/357,164, filed May 8, 2014 on behalf of Walter Schreiber. dated Feb. 9, 2015. 16 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/357,164, filed May 8, 2014 on behalf of Walter Schreiber. dated Aug. 10, 2015. 14 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/357,164, filed May 8, 2014 on behalf of Walter Schreiber. dated Sep. 10, 2014. 24 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/357,164, filed May 8, 2014 on behalf of Walter Schreiber. dated Jun. 22, 2015. 8 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/357,164, filed May 8, 2014 on behalf of Walter Schreiber. dated May 18, 2015. 12 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/357,164, filed May 8, 2014 on behalf of Walter Schreiber. dated Nov. 23, 2015. 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/357,164, filed May 8, 2014 on behalf of Walter Schreiber. dated Sep. 28, 2015. 12 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,902, filed Nov. 16, 2015 on behalf of Walter Schreiber. dated Mar. 10, 2016. 28 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076341 filed Dec. 20, 2012 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Feb. 8, 2013. (German original + English Translation) 15 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076341 filed Dec. 20, 2012 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Feb. 8, 2013. (German original + English Translation) 6 pages. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for International Application No. PCT/EP2012/076341 filed Dec. 20, 2012 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Jul. 15, 2014. (German original + English Translation) 17 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2014/053714 filed Feb. 26, 2014 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Mar. 25, 2014. (German original + English Translation) 10 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2014/053714 filed Feb. 26, 2014 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Mar. 25, 2014. (German original + English Translation) 7 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2014/054710 filed Mar. 11, 2014 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Apr. 4, 2014. (German original + English Translation) 12 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2014/054710 filed Mar. 11, 2014 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Apr. 4, 2014. (German original + English Translation) 5 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2014/067901 filed Aug. 22, 2014 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Oct. 7, 2014. (German original + English Translation) 13 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2014/067901 filed Aug. 22, 2014 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Oct. 7, 2014. (German original + English Translation) 5 pages. |
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2014/076739 filed on Dec. 5, 2014 in the name of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Feb. 3, 2015 (English translation & German original). |
Advisory Action issued for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,902, filed Nov. 16, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Jan. 5, 2017. 4 pages. |
International Search Report for International Patent Application PCT/EP2014/076736, filed Dec. 5, 2014 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Mar. 10, 2016. 5 pages (German Original + English Translation). |
International Search Report for International Patent Application PCT/EP2015/063814, filed Jun. 15, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Aug. 14, 2015. 5 pages (German Original + English Translation). |
International Search Report for International Patent Application PCT/EP2015/063821, filed Jun. 19, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Aug. 19, 2015. 5 pages (German Original + English Translation). |
International Search Report for International Patent Application PCT/EP2016/054226, filed Feb. 29, 2016 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated May 3, 2016. 5 pages (German Original + English Translation). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/038,356, filed May 20, 2016 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Feb. 22, 2018. 7 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,902, filed Nov. 16, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Apr. 4, 2017. 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,902, filed Nov. 16, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Jan. 3, 2018. 20 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/909,073, filed Jan. 29, 2016 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Apr. 4, 2017. 23 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/909,073, filed Jan. 29, 2016 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Aug. 25, 2017. 26 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/321,161, filed Dec. 21, 2016 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Mar. 20, 2018. 15 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 15/321,170, filed Dec. 21, 2016 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Mar. 22, 2018. 24 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,902, filed Nov. 16, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Sep. 26, 2016. 33 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,902, filed Nov. 16, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Sep. 12, 2017. 29 pages. |
Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/909,073, filed Jan. 29, 2016 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Jun. 20, 2017. 25 pages. |
Restriction Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 15/038,356, filed May 20, 2016 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Jan. 16, 2018. 7 pages. |
Sua Sponte Withdrawal issued for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,902, filed Nov. 16, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Feb. 2, 2018. 2 pages. |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2014/076739 filed on Dec. 5, 2014 in the name of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Feb. 3, 2015. 14 pages (German Original + English Translation). |
Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/EP2014/076736 filed on Dec. 5, 2014 in the name of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Mar. 10, 2016. 10 pages (German Original + English Translation). |
Written Opinion for International Patent Application PCT/EP2015/063814, filed Jun. 15, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Aug. 14, 2015. 16 pages (German Original + English Translation). |
Written Opinion for International Patent Application PCT/EP2015/063821, filed Jun. 19, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Aug. 19, 2015. 16 pages (German Original + English Translation). |
Written Opinion for International Patent Application PCT/EP2016/054226, filed Feb. 29, 2016 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated May 3, 2016. 9 pages (German Original + English Translation). |
Non-Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/942,902, filed Nov. 16, 2015 on behalf of Saint-Gobain Glass France. dated Apr. 2, 2018. 19 pages. |
Bishop, C.A. et al., “Metallizing Technical Reference”, AIMCAL, May 2012. Title and pp. 21-25. |
Phaneuf, M.W., “Applications of Focused Ion Beam Microscopy to Materials Science Specimens”, Micron 30. Jan. 28, 1999. pp. 277-288. |
Zimmermann, M.—7th International Vacuum Insulation Symposium 205, Table of Contents, pp. 1 to 4, Switzerland, Sep. 2005, 4 pages. |
Delstar Technologies online catalog, Delstar catalogs Delnet as a “Nets/Mesh/Apertured Film” Downloaded from the internet on Feb. 14, 2017. 1 page. (http://extrudedfilmsandnets.co.uk/product-types/nets-mesh-apertured-film). |
Delstar Technologies online catalog, Delstar catalogs Delnet as a “Search/Category-all/Net” Downloaded from the internet on Feb. 14, 2017. 1 page. (http://extrudedfilmsandnets.co.uk/products/finder/search/category-all/net). |
Opposition by opponent HELIMA GMBH in European Patent 2,802,7269 B1, issued Aug. 22, 2017 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail Date: Nov. 24, 2017. 14 pages. (German Original + English Translation). |
Response to notices of opposition against European Patent EP 2 802 726 B1 by the companies Technoform Glass Insulation Holding GmbH (01), Ensinger GmbH (02), Camvac Limited (03), Thermoseal Group Limited (04), ROLLTECH A/S (05), Helima GmbH (06). Mail Date: Aug. 22, 2017. 119 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Opposition by opponent Camvac Limited in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail date: Jan. 27, 2017. 16 pages. |
Annex A to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Press notes and articles from 2011”. May-Aug. 2011. 4 pages. |
Annex B to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Invoices and delivery notes from Thermoseal Group Ltd from Aug. 2011 to Dec. 2011”. Aug.-Dec. 2011. 24 pages. |
Annex BB to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Invoice and delivery note from Thermoseal Group Ltd of Aug. 2011”. Aug. 2011. 2 pages. |
Annex C1 to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Thermobar production sheets from Thermoseal Group Ltd of Dec. 22, 2011 and Dec. 23, 2011”. Dec. 22 and 23, 2011. 2 pages. |
Annex C2 to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Stock Control from Thermoseal Group Ltd from Jun. 8, 2011 to Dec. 22, 2011”. Jun. 8, 2011-Dec. 22, 2011. 14 pages. |
Annex C3 to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Invoices No. 47197, 47486 and 47812 from Lohmann of Jun. 30, 2011, Aug. 26, 2011 and Oct. 31, 2011”. Jun. 30, 2011, Aug. 26, 2011, and Oct. 31, 2011. 3 pages. |
Annex CC1 to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Thermobar production sheets from Thermoseal Group Ltd of Aug. 8, 2011 and Sep. 26, 2011”. Aug. 8, 2011 and Sep. 26, 2011. 2 pages. |
Annex CC2 to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Stock Control from Thermoseal Group Ltd of Jul. 29, 2011 and Sep. 6, 2011”. Jul. 29, 2011 and Sep. 6, 2011. 1 page. |
Annex CC3 to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Invoice No. 47340 from Lohmann of Jul. 29, 2011”. Jul. 29, 2011. 1 page. |
Annex E to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Delivery Notes with purchase order Nos. 7621, 7684, 7756, 7757 and 7832 from Camvac Limited of May 24, 2011, Jun. 8 and 29, 2011, Jul. 22, 2011 and Aug. 18, 2011”. May 24, 2011, Jun. 8, 2011, Jun. 29, 2011, Jul. 22, 2011, and Aug. 18, 2011. 5 pages. |
Annex F1A to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Screen shot of Data Sheet 12/12 Cambrite film from Camvac”. Jan. 19, 2017. 1 page. |
Annex F1B to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Declaration of Mr Gary Chalkley (Camvac Product Development Director)”. Jan. 24, 2017. 1 page. |
Annex F2 to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Declaration of Mr. James Shipman (Camvac Process Development Manager)”. Jan. 24, 2017. 2 pages. |
Annex G to opposition by opponent Camvac Limited. “Data sheet PSI values for windows having a Thermobar Warm Edge Spacer”. Nov. 2014. 1 page. |
Opposition by opponent Ensinger GmbH in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail date: Jan. 27, 2017. 44 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex D1A to opposition by opponent Ensinger GmbH. “Affidavit of Mr. Marc Rehling”. Jan. 24, 2017. 4 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex D1C to opposition by opponent Ensinger GmbH “Test Report AP 16-11-98”. Nov. 2016. 16 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex Die to opposition by opponent Ensinger GmbH. “ATR-Infrared Spectroscopy Measurement of the “Thermobar” Spacer”. Dec. 12, 2016. 2 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex D1F to opposition by opponent Ensinger GmbH. “Expert Opinion on “Thermobar” Spacer”. Jan. 18, 2017. 14 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex D2 to opposition by opponent Ensinger GmbH. “DIN EN ISO 10077-1 in the version dated May 2010”. May 2010. 48 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex D7 to opposition by opponent Ensinger GmbH. “Avis Technique [Technical Evaluation] 06/04- 1562 regarding the Super Spacer Premium and the Super Spacer Premium Plus the Edgetech Europe GmbH”. Jan. 4, 2005. 46 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Opposition by opponent Helima GmbH in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail date: Jan. 27, 2017. 159 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Supplement to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail date: Mar. 23, 2017. 6 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex A1 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Excerpt from the website of the company Viking regarding Window DK88”. Sep. 2012. 4 pages. |
Annex A2 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Excerpt from the Polish website of the patent holder”. Nov. 12, 2012. 3 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex A3 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Technical Opinion 6/13- 2124*01 Add of the CSTB”. Sep. 24, 2014. 60 pages (English Translation + French Original). |
Annex A4 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Technical Opinion 06/16-2303 of the CSTB”. Jun. 30, 2016. 62 pages. (English Translation + French Original). |
Annex A5 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Datasheet Swisspacer Ultimate”. Apr. 2013. 2 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex A6 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Excerpt from AIMCAL “Metallizing Technical Reference””. May 2012. 2 pages. |
Annex A7 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Excerpt from Frick/Knoll: Baukonstruktionslehre [Structural Design Theory] 2, Ed.34”. Hestermann and Rongen, “Frick/Knöll Baukonstruktionslehre 2”, pp. 371-372, 2013. 10 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex A8 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Affidavit”. Jan. 27, 2017. 2 pages. |
Annex A9 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Datasheet Sanco ACS Thermix”. Jun. 2009. 5 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex A10 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH. “Barrier films for vacuum insulation panels (VIP)”. Kaczmarek, “Barrier films for vacuum insulation panels (VIP)”, 7th International Vacuum Insulation Symposium 2005, pp. 91-98, 2005. 8 pages. |
Opposition by opponent Rolltech A/S in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail date: Jan. 27, 2017. 32 pages. |
Annex O1i to opposition by opponent Rolltech A/S. “Ceramis Barrier Films by Alcan Packaging”. Mar. 2005. 4 pages. |
Annex O1ii to opposition by opponent Rolltech A/S. “'Barrier Films: SiOx Barrier Benefits' by Marius Breune in Paper, Film & Foil Converter”. Oct. 1, 2010. 4 pages. |
Opposition by opponent Technoform Glass Insulation Holding GmbH in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail Date: Jan. 26, 2017. 55 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex E6a to opposition by opponent Technoform Glass Insulation Holding GmbH. “ISO 10077-1 in the version of 2006”. Sep. 15, 2006. 42 pages. |
Annex E6b to opposition by opponent Technoform Glass Insulation Holding GmbH. “ISO 10077-2 in the version of 2012”. Mar. 1, 2012. 44 pages. |
Annex E6c to opposition by opponent Technoform Glass Insulation Holding GmbH. “two data sheets Saint-Gobain Swisspacer from 2008”. Oct. 2008. 2 pages. |
Opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail date: Jan. 27, 2017. 20 pages. |
Annex A to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Press notes and articles from 2011”. May-Sep. 2011. 4 pages. |
Annex B to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Invoices and delivery notes from Thermoseal Group Ltd from Aug. 2011 to Dec. 2011”. Aug.-Dec. 2011. 24 pages. |
Annex BB to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Invoice and delivery note from Thermoseal Group Ltd of Aug. 2011”. Aug. 2011. 2 pages. |
Annex C1 to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Thermobar production sheets from Thermoseal Group Ltd of Dec. 22, 2011 and Dec. 23, 2011”. Dec. 22 and 23, 2011. 2 pages. |
Annex C2 to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Stock Control from Thermoseal Group Ltd from Jun. 8, 2011 to Dec. 22, 2011”. Jun. 8, 2011-Dec. 22, 2011. 14 pages. |
Annex C3 to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Invoices No. 47197, 47486 and 47812 from Lohmann of Jun. 30, 2011, Aug. 26, 2011 and Oct. 31, 2011”. Jun. 30, 2011, Aug. 26, 2011, Oct. 31, 2011. 3 pages. |
Annex CC1 to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Thermobar production sheets from Thermoseal Group Ltd of Aug. 8, 2011 and Sep. 26, 2011”. Aug. 8, 2011 and Sep. 26, 2011. 2 pages. |
Annex CC2 to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Stock Control from Thermoseal Group Ltd of Jul. 29, 2011 and Sep. 6, 2011”. Jul. 29, 2011 and Sep. 6, 2011. 1 page. |
Annex CC3 to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Invoice No. 47340 from Lohmann of Jul. 29, 2011”. Jul. 29, 2011. 1 page. |
Annex D2 to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Declaration of Ms Amanda Smith (Lohmann Segment Manager)”. Jan. 18, 2014. 1 page. |
Annex E to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Delivery Notes with purchase order Nos. 7621, 7684, 7756, 7757 and 7832 from Camvac Limited of May 24, 2011, Jun. 8 and 29, 2011, Jul. 22, 2011 and Aug. 18, 2011”. Jul. 22, 2011 and Aug. 18, 2011. 6 pages. |
Annex F1A to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Screen shot showing the last date that the 12/12 Cambrite film from Camvac data sheet was modified”. Jan. 19, 2017. 1 page. |
Annex F2 to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Declaration of Mr James Shipman (Camvac Process Development Manager)”. Jan. 24, 2017. 2 pages. |
Annex G to opposition by opponent Thermoseal Group Ltd. “Data sheet PSI values for windows having a Thermobar Warm Edge Spacer”. Nov. 2014. 1 page. |
Annex D1C to opposition by opponent Ensinger GmbH (Jan. 27, 2017) in European Patent 2,802,726 B1 (issued to Saint-Gobain Glass France). “Test Report, Light micrographs of two existing polished sections with the designation 2010 und 2011”, Institute of Polymertechnology, Nov. 2016, 16 pages (English Translation + German Original). |
Annex A7 to opposition by opponent Helima GmbH (Jan. 27, 2017) in European Patent 2,802,726 B1 (issued to Saint-Gobain Glass France). Hestermann and Rongen, “Frick/Knöll Baukonstruktionslehre 2”, pp. 371-372, 1996-2013, 10 pages (English Translation + German Original). |
Reply by opponent Rolltech A/S in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail date: Feb. 1, 2018. 8 pages. |
Exhibit S27c to reply by opponent Rolltech A/S in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Sep. 12, 2017. 2 pages. |
Exhibit S27d to reply by opponent Rolltech A/S in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Oct. 2010. 6 pages. |
Reply by opponent Technoform Glass Insulation Holding GmbH in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail Date: Apr. 20, 2018. 15 pages. (English Translation + German Original). |
Response by patentee Saint-Gobain Glass France to opponent's reply papers in European Patent 2,802,726 B1, issued Apr. 27, 2016 to Saint-Gobain Glass France. Mail date: Jun. 18, 2018. 32 pages (English Translation + German Original). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160290032 A1 | Oct 2016 | US |