The invention is generally related to floating offshore structures and more particularly to the load out, float off, and channel tow of a spar type hull.
There are a number of spar hull designs available in the offshore drilling and production industry. These include the truss spar, classic spar, and cell spar. The term spar hull structure described herein refers to any floating structure platform, which those of ordinary skill in the offshore industry will understand as any floating production and/or drilling platform or vessel having an open centerwell configuration.
The spar supports a topside structure and comprises a hard tank, truss section, and a soft tank. In the case of the classic spar, the hard tank and soft tank are connected by a cylinder instead of a truss. The hard tank supplies the majority of the buoyancy to support the hull structure, risers, and topsides. The hard tank is divided into a number of chambers among which the ballast water can be shifted to control the spar's buoyancy and stability.
When the spar is placed in its operating configuration offshore, the spar cylinder is exposed to currents in the ocean. The current acting on the spar cylinder produces VIV (vortex induced vibration). Because the VIV can produce unacceptable motions of the spar, helical strakes are added to the cylindrical portion of the spar as a means of eliminating or reducing the VIV. The strakes extend outwardly from the hard tank and are attached in a helical pattern around the hard tank. The fact that helical strakes reduce VIV is well known in the offshore industry.
The hard tanks of a spar can be as much as 150 feet in diameter. To be effective the strakes must extend outward from the hull a distance of 12-15% of the hull diameter. The strakes add significantly to the outside diameter of the hard tank without adding much buoyancy. Spars are built lying on their sides, loaded out onto HLV's (Heavy Lift Vessels) on their sides, and floated off into the water on their sides. Therefore, on the larger diameter spars there is not sufficient water depth near the fabrication yard to provide bottom clearance for the strake tips. Since the float off operation is very sensitive to sea states, the spars must be floated off the HLV in protected water near the fabrication yard.
When the HLV is ballasted downward to float off the spar, the HLV with the spar on board goes through a minimal stability when the deck of the HLV goes awash. This occurs because the HLV loses most of its water plane area when its deck goes awash, and the spar is not yet picking up much water plane area. Traditionally, the problem has been solved with two methods. First, the HLV is trimmed by the stern so that the soft tank of the spar picks up some water plane area, before the HLV deck goes awash. Second, supplementary stability modules are added to the HLV deck to improve stability.
Frequently, after the spar is floated off the HLV in protected water the spar must be moved alongside the fabrication yard quay to perform additional work. Once the spar is completed it must be towed down the channel to the open sea. However, there is insufficient water depth at quayside to provide strake tip clearance, and there is insufficient strake tip bottom clearance in the channel leading from the fabrication yard to the open sea.
One method of solving the clearance problem is to install a portion of the strakes at sea. That way, the strakes do not project below the “belly” of the hard tank during the movement of the spar to quayside, or during the channel tow. This method has been tried once, and was found to be more difficult and expensive than expected.
The weight and vertical center of gravity of a large diameter spar are too great for load out and float off by existing HLV's. The solution has been to build the spar in two pieces, then load out and transport each piece separately, float off the individual pieces, and then join them as they float on their sides in protected water. However, this adds expense and difficulty to the construction of the spar and is not a favored solution.
Thus, it can be seen that there is a need for an improved method for load out and transport to the open sea of a spar type structure.
The present invention addresses the shortcomings in the known art and is drawn to a method and apparatus that yields sufficient bottom clearance for the strake tips of a large diameter spar. In addition, the present invention makes it possible to load out and float off a large diameter spar in one piece using existing HLV's. The present invention also applies to the load out of other structures such as a deck.
A U-tank is placed between the stern of the HLV and the fabrication yard quay. The U-tank is equipped with load out ways. During load out the spar skids along the U-tank ways onto the HLV. The spar ends up partly on the HLV and partly on the U-tank. The U-tank artificially extends the length of the HLV and provides supplemental buoyancy and water plane area that enables existing HLV's to lift the spar off the fabrication yard ways during load out.
After load out onto the HLV and U-tank, the spar assembly is moved to a float off site nearby. The site must have sufficient water depth for a float off. Most float off sites near a fabrication yard in protected water would require that a pit be dredged to provide the required water depth. The HLV will be ballasted downward to float the spar off the HLV. The U-tank provides enough supplemental buoyancy and water plane area to enable the float off.
After the departure of the HLV and while the spar is still at the float off site, the U-tank is relocated and placed beneath a frame that cantilevers from the top end of the hard tank. The U-tank is ballasted upward to lift the spar. Lifting the spar reduces its draft and provides the strake tip bottom clearance required to move the spar alongside the fabrication yard quay, and subsequently, for the channel tow.
The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the present invention, and the operating advantages attained by its use, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter, forming a part of this disclosure, in which a preferred embodiment of the invention is illustrated.
In the accompanying drawings, forming a part of this specification, and in which reference numerals shown in the drawings designate like or corresponding parts throughout the same:
The invention is a sequence of positions and operations of the U-tank acting in concert with the HLV.
As seen in
The strakes 16 are shown as being incomplete on the bottom side of the hard tank 18. It should be understood that “incomplete”, in the offshore industry, may mean that the strakes on the bottom side of the hard tank are partial strakes that extend outward from the hard tank 18 only a portion of the specified distance as indicated above and the remainder of the strake will be installed after the spar 10 is in the water. It can also mean that no strakes are attached to the bottom of the hard tank 18 while it is on land and that this portion of the strakes will be attached after the spar 10 is in the water.
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
As seen in
After the channel tow the U-tank 20 is separated from the spar 10 in a good weather operation at a near shore location. First, the spar 10 is ballasted for the wet tow to the installation site and then the U-tank is ballasted down until the spar 10 floats free. The U-tank 20 is separated longitudinally from the spar 10 and towed back to the fabrication site.
It should be understood that the method may also be accomplished by separating the U-tank 20 from the spar 10 and the HLV 26 at the initial load out site of the spar 10, once the spar 10 has been loaded onto the HLV 26. The HLV 26 may then be used to transport the spar 10 to a different, desired site for separation from the HLV 26 and further work on the strakes 16. Once at the new site, the U-tank 20 is reattached to the spar 10 and HLV 26 and the operation is carried out as described above.
In the configuration and operational sequence illustrated, the U-tank enhances the lifting capacity and stability of existing HLV's so that they can be used to load out and float off large diameter spars fabricated in one piece. The same U-tank is used to lift the spar after it is floated off the HLV to reduce its draft so that the channel tow to open sea can be made.
The major advantage offered by the inventive method of using the U-shaped tank is that the larger spar structures can be loaded out and floated off using one of several existing HLV's. Then the same U-shaped tank is used to reduce the draft of the spar so that the strakes can be completed and the channel tow to open sea made with completed strakes. Thus, the inventive method provides a capability which did not previously exist.
While the drawings and description are designed to illustrate the load out of a spar structure, it should be understood that the method described and illustrated is also applicable to any type of heavy or large structure, such as a deck for an offshore structure, that is skidded out from the fabrication yard, as opposed to being lifted out by a crane. The main difference from the description for the spar structure is that other structures may not require rotation once in the water or may not require being placed in the water prior to transportation. For installation on a base structure, such as a jacket, spar, or TLP, such other structures may be lifted from the HLV or they may be set in-place using a float over method known in the industry.
While specific embodiments and/or details of the invention have been shown and described above to illustrate the application of the principles of the invention, it is understood that this invention may be embodied as more fully described in the claims, or as otherwise known by those skilled in the art (including any and all equivalents), without departing from such principles.
This application claims priority from Provisional Application No. 61/422,712 filed Dec. 14, 2010.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3680512 | Yamura | Aug 1972 | A |
4135842 | Blight et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
6244785 | Richter et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6565286 | Carr et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6672803 | Richter et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6953308 | Horton | Oct 2005 | B1 |
7553106 | Horton et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
20080014024 | Lokken et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20100192829 | Luo et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100221070 | Luo et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120148381 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61422712 | Dec 2010 | US |