There are numerous examples of spare tire anti-theft devices in the prior art. Many of these devices utilize a wide range of components to prevent the spare from being removed from the car by would-be thieves. Despite the use and availability of such devices, spare tire theft persists and, by many accounts, has increased.
Spare tires that are accessible from the exterior of the automobile are particularly susceptible to theft and are regularly targeted by thieves. There many types of systems used to secure spare tires to the exterior of the automobile. An example includes a cable and yoke system that secures the spare tire to the underside of the automobile carriage using a winch, cable, and yoke. When the tire is secured, the cable is often accessible through an opening in the rim of the tire. Thieves can insert cable cutters through the rim and sever the exposed portion of the cable, which thereby simultaneously separates the tire from the system and damages the system. Often times, the entire securement system needs to be replaced (winch, cable, and yoke). The vehicle owner typically incurs the cost of obtaining a new rim, tire, securement system, and labor associated with installation of each. Detrimentally, the owner typically does not notice the theft until the spare tire is needed in an emergency. In which case, the owner typically incurs the added cost of emergency service providers, such as towing.
Known devices and methods for preventing theft of spare tires lack in effectiveness, practicality, or both. For example, one inadequate solution is to chain the tire with a pad lock or combination lock to the underside of the carriage. Such a system is still susceptible to being breached by chain cutters. In addition, the locks are easily compromised by weather and other elements. Moisture, salt, and dirt can seize locks and bolts leaving the motorist unable to remove the spare tire during an emergency. Further, even if the lock is not compromised by the weather, the added inconvenience to the motorist for having to position themselves under the car to open the lock in darkness or inclement weather is undesirable.
There is a long felt need for an effective spare tire anti-theft system and method. The present disclosure details example embodiments a spare tire anti-theft system and method that offers both effective anti-theft protection and ease of access to the tire. There is also a long felt need to provide effective spare tire anti-theft protection, ease of access to the tire, and reliable access to the tire. The present disclosure describes example embodiments of a spare tire anti-theft system and method which provides effective spare tire anti-theft protection, ease of access to the tire, reliable access to the tire, in an uncomplicated and cost effective manner.
A more complete understanding of the present disclosure and the advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description in consideration of the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:
Referring to
Referring to
To secure a spare tire to the underside surface 19 using a cable and yoke system, the cable is first drawn from the winch to extend the length of uncoiled cable and provide slack. Next, the yoke is inserted through the center bore of the hub 16 of the rim 6 of the spare tire 1 and positioned against the back side of the hub. The yoke and spare tire is drawn toward the underside of the automobile by, for example, cranking or winding the winch to draw the cable into the winch. The spare tire is secured against the underside surface 19 of the automobile by the tire or rim coming in contact with a portion of the underside surface 19 and the winch system holding the position of the cable taught to maintain such contact. Some systems use a chain in place of a cable 4 to perform the function of the cable.
Cable and yolk systems typically permit access to the cable 4 through multiple openings while the spare tire is secured to the underside of the automobile. For example, space between the yoke 3 and inside surface of the center bore 24 of the hub 16 of the rim 6 defines an opening 5 through which the cable 4 can be reached. In addition, spaces between spokes 44 of the rim 6 can provide openings 7 through which the cable 4 can be reached. Other openings through which the cable can be reached can be created by the various sizes and shapes of tires, rims, and the undercarriage, and the manner and orientation in which the tires and rims are secured to the undercarriage. For example, any space between the tire and the underside surface of the automobile can create such an opening.
Referring to
In addition, a thief can use a leveraging device to pry the cable coupling 22 off the cable 4. For example, a crowbar can be used to engage the extension and spring assembly 10 of the cable coupling 22 and sever the coupling 22 from the cable 4 to thereby release the yoke from the cable and thereby release the tire from being secured to the underside of the vehicle by the cable and yoke. Accordingly, the portion of the cable coupling extending from the underside of the yoke, including an extension and spring assembly, can be a vulnerable aspect of a cable and yoke securement system that can be targeted by thieves.
Referring to
In an embodiment, the cap includes a cover portion 30. The cover portion can be configured to cover a portion of the yoke and the cable coupling extending from the underside of the yoke. The cover portion 30 can include an outer wall 31 having an outside surface 33, an inside surface 35, a closed bottom end 37, and an open top end 39. A cavity 41 is defined in the open top end 39. The cavity 41 can be configured to enclose at least a portion of the yoke and cable system, including the yoke body 18 and/or the cable coupling extending below the yoke.
The cap 26 can include a first stanchion and a second stanchion extending upwardly from the open top end 39. The first and second stanchions can be positioned opposite each other and can be spaced from each other such that a body 18 of the yoke 3 can be positioned between the first and second stanchions, as shown by example in
To install the cap 26, the cover portion 30 is placed to position the cable coupling extending below the yoke into the cavity 41 of the cover portion and the first and second stanchions are each positioned though an opening defined between each side of the body of the yoke and the inside surface of the center bore of the hub. The cap retainer is then positioned on the opposite side of the hub from the closed bottom end of the cover portion and secured to at least one of the first and second stanchion to hold the device 9 in place.
In an embodiment, the first and second stanchion include male threads on the outside surface of the stanchions and the cap retainer includes female threads on an inside surface of the stanchion to thereby allow the stanchions and the cap retainer to be threadedly engaged. In an embodiment, at least one of the stanchions and the cap retainer include holes defied therein that can be aligned and accept a pin therethrough to secure the cap retainer to the cap, such as shown by example in
In an embodiment, the cap retainer is configured in the form of a ring, such as shown by example in
Referring to
The devices of the instant disclosure overcomes the disadvantages of the prior art and accomplishes the surprising result of a combination of effective anti-theft protection, theft deterrent, ease of access to the spare tire, reliable access to the spare tire, in an uncomplicated and cost effective manner. The anti-theft effectiveness of the devices disclosed herein are exhibited by that, for example, a great majority of the cutting devices or leveraging devices used to sever cables of cable and yoke systems are rendered useless for such purpose. The devices of the instant disclosure provides effective anti-theft protection while providing ease of access to the spare tire. The device provides effective anti-theft protection and reliable access to the spare as, for example, the device is generally unaffected by the elements. The devices provide effective anti-theft protection in an easy to use, cost-effective manner in that, for example, the device can consist of one piece or several easily assemble pieces. The combination of anti-theft effectiveness and the aforementioned advantages are surprising and, in addition, solve a long-felt need for a solution where many others have failed to achieve such combination.
The reader should understand that these specific examples are set forth merely to illustrate examples of the device, and they should not be construed as limiting. Many variations may be made from the specific structures described above without departing from this disclosure.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/092,946 entitled “Wheel Lock Assembly” and filed on Dec. 17, 2014 which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3724731 | Potgieter | Apr 1973 | A |
3824815 | Darling | Jul 1974 | A |
4042158 | Cole | Aug 1977 | A |
4076158 | Barr | Feb 1978 | A |
4111344 | MacDonald | Sep 1978 | A |
4161267 | Morrison, Jr. | Jul 1979 | A |
4225066 | Barr | Sep 1980 | A |
4282995 | Austin | Aug 1981 | A |
4294088 | Barr | Oct 1981 | A |
4308733 | Tampa | Jan 1982 | A |
4428513 | Delmastro | Jan 1984 | A |
4548540 | Renfro | Oct 1985 | A |
4738382 | Natori | Apr 1988 | A |
4751833 | Stumpf, Jr. | Jun 1988 | A |
4768361 | Derman | Sep 1988 | A |
4873851 | Arnett | Oct 1989 | A |
4878366 | Cox | Nov 1989 | A |
4884785 | Denman et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4932575 | Ware | Jun 1990 | A |
4988023 | Heathcoat | Jan 1991 | A |
5077995 | Appelbaum | Jan 1992 | A |
5199287 | McClary | Apr 1993 | A |
5303569 | Wright | Apr 1994 | A |
5330313 | Easterwood | Jul 1994 | A |
5343722 | Richardson | Sep 1994 | A |
D351986 | Schotthoefer | Nov 1994 | S |
5475995 | Livingston | Dec 1995 | A |
5477711 | Oliveri | Dec 1995 | A |
5487288 | Frantz | Jan 1996 | A |
5582048 | Schotthoefer | Dec 1996 | A |
5638710 | Howard, Jr. et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5638711 | Schotthoefer | Jun 1997 | A |
5718411 | Baughan et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
D395221 | Ryan et al. | Jun 1998 | S |
5758523 | Kozlowski, Jr. et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5791171 | Kelley | Aug 1998 | A |
5802895 | Osgood | Sep 1998 | A |
5823413 | Seltz | Oct 1998 | A |
5836182 | Schotthoefer | Nov 1998 | A |
5924314 | Cernansky | Jul 1999 | A |
5943887 | Kozlowski, Jr. et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954246 | Golovoy et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5967389 | Hutter et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975498 | Sauner | Nov 1999 | A |
D421707 | Gregory | Mar 2000 | S |
6092790 | Dobmeier et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6142449 | Aldridge et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6164100 | Schotthoefer | Dec 2000 | A |
6213361 | Dexel | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6360571 | O'Neal | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370927 | Gonzalez et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6390760 | Affer et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6427885 | Dexel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6499724 | Dobmeier et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6505488 | Princell | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6527252 | Dziedzic | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6554253 | Dobmeier et al. | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6561489 | Wakefield | May 2003 | B1 |
6648577 | Obriot | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6749094 | Dexel | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6871841 | Brestelli et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
7195231 | Murphy | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7413171 | Reznar | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7487952 | Murphy | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7487953 | Sauner et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7533789 | Seely et al. | May 2009 | B1 |
7770764 | Rock | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7857178 | Brown, Jr. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8650732 | Huber | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8714419 | Pulice | May 2014 | B2 |
20040265102 | Reznar | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060013679 | Posani | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060045689 | Voegeli et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070241144 | Rock | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20100186467 | Reidl et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2806056 | Sep 2001 | FR |
2365395 | Feb 2002 | GB |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160176451 A1 | Jun 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62092946 | Dec 2014 | US |