The invention relates to spark plug boots, particularly to removing spark plug boots and especially to facilitating reusability of spark plug boots.
Certain approaches for removing spark plugs have been provided. However, spark plugs have changed over time and spark plug removal technology currently is inadequate for conventional spark plugs.
As background, the following literature is mentioned in chronological order:
U.S. Pat. No. 4,202,088 issued May 13, 1980 to Hansen for “Spark plug boot puller.”
U.S. Pat. No. 4,425,697 issued Jan. 17, 1984 to Simmons for “Spark plug boot remover.”
U.S. Pat. No. 5,253,408 issued Oct. 19, 1993 to Wright for “Extraction tool.”
U.S. Pat. No. D506,907 S issued Jul. 5, 2005 to Olivarez for “Grounding tool with locking mechanism for removing spark plug boot.”
U.S. Pat. No. 7,243,419 issued Jul. 17, 2007 to Cheng for “Spark plug boot removal tool.”
The invention may be appreciated with reference to the attached figures, without the invention being limited thereto:
The present inventors have considered today's more-durable spark plugs to which spark plug boots tend to stick and be difficult to pull off, and in solution to the problem have invented a spark plug boot puller and a method of pulling apart today's spark plugs and spark plug boots.
The invention in one preferred embodiment provides a method of removing a spark plug boot from a spark plug booted by the spark plug boot, comprising: separating the spark plug boot from the spark plug without damaging the spark plug boot (such as, e.g., a separating step that comprises inserting, between the spark plug boot and the spark plug, a relatively-flat, relatively-rectangular surface that is a terminus of a hook (such as, e.g., a U-shaped hook; a J-shaped hook); a separating step that comprises inserting a U-shaped hook between the spark plug boot and the spark plug booted by the spark plug boot, and maneuvering the U-shaped hook until the spark plug boot is separated from the spark plug; and other separating steps).
The invention in one preferred embodiment of the invention provides: a spark plug boot puller, comprising: a U-shaped hook, such as, e.g., a spark plug boot puller consisting essentially of the hook and a handle member; a spark plug boot puller further comprising an adjustable handle member; etc.
The invention in another preferred embodiment provides a method of separating a spark plug boot and a spark plug, comprising: inserting a U-shaped hook between the spark plug boot and the spark plug, and pulling until the spark plug boot and the spark plug have separated.
In another preferred embodiment, the invention provides a reusable-spark-plug-boot kit, comprising: at least one spark plug boot; and a spark plug boot puller, wherein the spark plug boot puller cooperates with at least one spark plug boot installed on a spark plug, to remove the boot from the spark plug without damage to the boot.
The invention in another preferred embodiment provides a spark plug boot puller, comprising: a hook having a terminus for insertion between a spark plug boot and a spark plug booted by the spark plug boot; wherein the terminus has substantially rectangular dimensions (such as, e.g., substantially a rectangle that is about 3/16 inch by about 1/16 inch; etc.).
The invention is discussed with reference to a preferred embodiment and
Herein, “U-shaped” excludes a V-shape which has been found to tear the spark plug boot too easily. The U-shape avoids the risk of tearing the spark plug boot and gets around the boot to remove the boot.
The tongue 10 of the hook 1 should be wide enough to exert force when inserted between the spark plug boot and the spark plug, but not too wide to practically be inserted therebetween. A preferred example of a thickness 10t of a tongue 10 of a hook 1 is about 1/16 inch, for separating spark plugs such as on Fords, GM's, Chryslers, Toyotas, etc., and other vehicles that do not use a Hemi-type spark plug. With regard to those sorts of spark plugs, for a boot puller tool formed from steel, we have found that a tongue thickness 10t much thicker than about 1/16 inch has trouble fitting between the boot and the plug. On the other end, we have found that for a tool formed from steel, a tongue thickness 10t much smaller than about 1/16 inch tends to become too flimsy and can bend.
It will be appreciated that in order for the hook 1 to be useable, the boot puller 100 or 300 must include a handle 9. The tongue 10 and the handle 9 form opposite sides of the U shape, with the tongue 10 extending from one end of the U shape and the handle 9 extending from the other end of the U shape. In a preferred example, the tongue length 10L (
Preferably the tongue 10 ends not in a sharpened or pointed manner (that is, the case where thickness 10t is near-zero is not preferred) but rather, some reasonable-to-machine minimal thickness 10t with about 1/16 inch being a preferred example. In the case of a machined steel boot puller, too-small thickness 10t is to be avoided because a pointy end has the risk of tearing or puncturing the boot. Likewise, jagged or irregular feature for the hook 1 are to be avoided for the same reason.
The U or J shape of the hook 1 need not have perfect symmetry with regard to the parts of the hook 1 formed respectively by the tongue 10 and the handle 9. For example, the tongue 10 may be somewhat angled outwards into a more open U shape than if the tongue 10 and the handle 9 were strictly parallel.
The handle 9 must extend of sufficient length so that pulling forces can be generated when the boot puller 100 is used manually. A preferred example of a length of a handle 9 is about 14 cm from the hook 1 at its curved part 1a to where the handle 9 joins the hand grip 8.
The handle 9 and the hand grip 8 are either of unitary construction or are welded together.
A preferred shape of the hand grip 8 is a hexagonal solid shape, with the handle 9 being of a diameter such that the handle 9 fits between two of a user's figures and the user's fingers can wrap around the hand grip 8. The hand grip 8 may be formed as other shapes besides a hexagonal solid, which is shown for illustrative purposes. It is preferred for the hand grip 8 to have a gripping exterior.
The width 8a of the hand grip 8 preferably is such that the hand grip 8 is sized about the size of a finger of smallish thickness, such as a width 8a of about 1.5 cm.
The length 8b of the hand grip 8 preferably is smaller than an average palm of a user, such as a length 8b of about 4.2 cm.
Referring to
The invention may be used with today's spark plug and spark plug boot combinations which particularly tend to stick compared to past combinations. Examples of such spark plugs with which the invention may be used are, e.g., Fords, GM's, Chryslers, Toyotas, and other vehicles that do not use a Hemi-type spark plug.
The following examples are provided for better appreciating the invention, without the invention being limited thereto.
The spark plug boot puller of this example was formed by the following steps in the following order to construct the shaft/hook:
1. Cut 5/32″ steel rod stock to a length of 7 inches
2. Heat one end to a temperature of 1200 degrees
3. Forge with a hammer and anvil to taper back ⅜″ to a wedge
4. Place end in vice, ⅜″ from end, and bend around and shape into a “U”
5. File off sharp edge of hook and file down sides of hook body back to 5/32″ rod stock
6. Heat hook end to a temperature of 1200 degrees and immerse into ice water to re-temper metal
The following steps were followed to construct the T Handle:
1. Drill a 5/32″ hole into the center of a ⅜″ coupling
2. Insert hook into drilled hole
3. Insert two ⅜″ hex head bolts into each end of the coupling and tighten each hex head bolt evenly
4. Cut off bolt heads and file to remove rough edges
There was thereby actually constructed a spark plug boot puller formed of steel according to
The spark plug boot puller of Example 1 has been tested on: Fords; GM's; Chryslers; and Toyotas.
The invention therefore advantageously provides the ability to remove a spark plug boot, without damaging the boot, so that the spark plug boot can be reused. The invention therefore is superior to conventional ways of removing a spark plug boot that would damage the boot (and perhaps the plug) and further give rise to the expense of using a new boot and wire. In the present invention, advantageously it is possible to save the boot and wire so that a removed boot optionally may be reused (that is, rebooted onto a spark plug).
While the invention has been described in connection with preferred embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that other variations and modifications of the preferred embodiments described above may be made without departing from the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/986,783 filed Nov. 9, 2007 entitled “Spark Plug Boot Puller” by Charles Hurley and Thomas Zagami.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3103836 | Bristol, III | Sep 1963 | A |
3209503 | Mostoller | Oct 1965 | A |
4202088 | Hansen | May 1980 | A |
4240192 | Davis | Dec 1980 | A |
4425697 | Simmons | Jan 1984 | A |
4780942 | Bernat | Nov 1988 | A |
5253408 | Wright | Oct 1993 | A |
D506907 | Olivarez | Jul 2005 | S |
7017247 | Detzel | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7243419 | Cheng | Jul 2007 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090119897 A1 | May 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60986783 | Nov 2007 | US |