The present invention relates to a spark plug connector, in particular for large engines such as large gas engines.
Spark plug connectors form a substantially rigid connection between spark plugs, which primarily in the case of large engines are recessed deep into bores in the engine block, and the spark plug leads which lead to at least one ignition coil. They may attain a length of more than half a metre. Their rigidity is selected such that on the one hand it is readily possible to push them onto the spark plug, preferably without the need for further tools, although on the other hand the spark plug connectors typically have a certain residual flexibility. Thus, in most cases they are not completely rigid.
It is furthermore known from the prior art that ohmic resistor elements can be used to suppress interference in ignition systems. The disadvantage of these interference suppression resistors is that they consume an unnecessarily high quantity of useful energy in order to damp the radio frequency disturbance. This lost energy must on the one hand be made available by the ignition system and on the other hand results in the components concerned, such as the spark plug connector, becoming hot. This heating is highly problematic since, as a result of the electrical insulation resistance demanded among other things of the spark plug connector, materials which may also be poor heat conductors are used. This problem becomes particularly acute if—as is conventional with large engines—ignition systems which generate very high levels of ignition power are employed.
The object of the invention is to provide a spark plug connector which helps to eliminate the problems described.
In accordance with the invention, this is achieved with a spark plug connector, in particular for large engines, with an inductive interference suppression device which has a ferromagnetic core with at least one winding, preferably a coil, and an ohmic d.c. resistance of at least 20 Ω at 20° C.
The use of an inductive interference suppression device according to the invention, instead of the sole use of an ohmic d.c. resistor, significantly improves the energy balance, since the interference suppression device can be configured such that it presents a high resistance to high frequencies and, at the same time, a very low resistance to the lower-frequency useful energy. To achieve optimum interference suppression behaviour, the inductance of the winding or coil is used in conjunction with the ohmic d.c. resistor. To achieve sufficient inductance, a winding with a ferromagnetic core must be used. So that the overall shape can be kept as small as possible, the winding or coil may have a resistor wire to provide the ohmic d.c. resistance. A preferred embodiment provides for the ferromagnetic core to be made from a material which is not electrically conductive, or has very high resistance. An electrically non-conductive ferrite core and a specific d.c. resistance for the interference suppression device of at least 100 Ω, preferably at least 500 Ω, at 20° C., are particularly advantageous.
Further details and advantages of the present invention will emerge from the description below of the drawings, in which:
The spark plug connector 2 has a support 10 made from polytetrafluoroethylene, with a central bore 11. The spark plug lead 5 is guided inside the spark plug connector 10 through this bore to the inductive interference suppression device 3. As illustrated, the spark plug connector 2 is pushed onto the spark plug 4, as known from the prior art, making an electrical contact by way of the terminal contact 12. The support 10, substantially intrinsically rigid, of the spark plug connector makes it possible for pushing the spark plug connector onto the spark plug 4 to be sufficient to secure it. In addition, however, a fixing device 8 which secures the spark plug connector 10 to the engine block 7 may also be provided. For this purpose, screw, plug or other types of clamping connections may be provided. To obtain the maximum effect of the inductive interference suppression device 3 with the minimum of losses, the interference suppression device 3 should be mounted as close as possible to the main source of interference. In this case, the source of interference is spark-over at the electrodes of the spark plug 4. Because it is impossible in practice to arrange the inductive interference suppression device 3 in the spark plug, for mechanical and thermal reasons, taking into account too the overall size of the inductive interference element 3, the inductive interference suppression element 3 should be electrically connected as close as possible, preferably substantially directly, to the terminal contact 12. This is shown in
The inductive interference suppression device 3 should in principle be configured such that interference primarily in the frequency range between 1 MHz and 1 GHz, preferably between 30 MHz and one GHz, is suppressed particularly effectively. For this purpose, it is advantageous for the inductive interference suppression device to have an inductance of between 200 μH and 500 μH, preferably between 300 μH and 400 μH. The electric strength of the spark plug connector 2 overall should be more than 10 kV, preferably more than 30 kV. Together with the ohmic d.c. resistors of the inductive interference suppression device 3 that have already been indicated above, this makes it possible to transmit high levels of ignition power with very low losses and hence very low heat generation. In practice, levels of ignition power of more than 200 mJ to 1 J at an ignition rate, or a number of ignitions per unit of time, of 12.5 Hz to 15 Hz can be transmitted without problems. When resistor wire is used, the latter may preferably be made from a nickel chromium alloy. Examples of such alloys are sold under the trade name ISA-CHROM.
Advantageous variants on the spark plug connector provide for it to have a length of at least 10 cm, preferably between 40 cm and 70 cm. In relation to the position of the inductive interference suppression device 3, however, it may also be provided for the end of the spark plug connector 2 remote from the terminal contact 12 to be at least 10 cm, preferably between 40 cm and 70 cm, away from the end of the inductive interference suppression device 3 which is remote from the terminal contact 12.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
A 1786/2004 | Oct 2004 | AT | national |