Patent Grant
9184570
This application is related to and claims priority from Japanese Patent Applications No. 2012-181583 filed on Aug. 20, 2012 and No. 2013-59611 filed on Mar. 22, 2013, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to spark plugs for use in internal combustion engines of motor vehicles.
2. Description of the Related Art
Internal combustion engines mounted to motor vehicles use various types of spark plugs in order to ignite a fuel in a combustion chamber. For example, a spark plug has a conventional structure in which a spark discharging gap is formed between a center electrode and an earth electrode. Spark discharge is generated in the spark discharging gap formed between the center electrode and the earth electrode in order to ignite a mixture gas composed of air and a fuel in the combustion chamber of the internal combustion engine. There is another type of a spark plug having a structure in which an electrode chip is formed on the center electrode or the earth electrode in order to increase an ignition capability, etc.
Recently, there is a demand for improving a wear resistance of an electrode chip used in a spark plug in view of a temperature increase in a combustion chamber of an internal combustion engine because the internal combustion engine has a high performance, etc. There are spark abrasion or spark wear and oxidation abrasion or oxidation wear which abrades an electrode chip in a spark plug. In the spark abrasion, a surface of the electrode chip is instantaneously melted by the spark discharge. On the other hand, in an occurrence of oxidation abrasion, a surface of an electrode is oxidized and vapored when the spark plug is used in a high temperature environment. For example, a Japanese patent laid open publication No. JP H09-298083 has disclosed a spark plug having a conventional structure in which an electrode chip is made of iridium Ir having a high melting point and a superior spark abrasion resistance capability. In addition to iridium, the electrode chip contains platinum Pt and rhodium Rh having a superior oxidation resistance.
However, because the conventional electrode chip used in the spark plug disclosed in JP H09-298083 is made of noble metals such as iridium, platinum and rhodium, this increases a manufacturing cost of the electrode chip and the spark plug. So, there is a demand for providing a spark plug having a superior spark discharging wear resistance capability, a superior oxidation resistance and a long life with a low manufacturing cost.
It is therefore desired to provide a spark plug having a superior spark discharging wear resistance, a superior oxidation resistance and a long life with a low manufacturing cost.
An exemplary embodiment provides a spark plug having a center electrode and an earth electrode. In the spark plug, the earth electrode is arranged, which is faced to the center electrode so that a spark discharging gap is formed between the center electrode and the earth electrode. An electrode chip is formed on at least one of the center electrode and the earth electrode. In particular, the electrode chip contains 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum Al and iridium Ir as a remainder thereof.
In a structure of the spark plug according to an exemplary embodiment, the electrode chip is formed on at least one of the center electrode and the earth electrode. The electrode chip contains 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum and iridium as a remainder thereof. That is, the electrode chip in the spark plug is made of an alloy which contains aluminum and iridium (Ir—Al alloy). In particular, because the content of aluminum in the electrode chip is within a range of 40 to 60 mol % of the entire composition of the electrode chip, intermetallic compound Ir—Al is present as a main phase in the Ir—Al alloy.
The intermetallic compound Ir—Al in the Ir—Al alloy in the electrode chip has a high melting point and a superior oxidation resistance. That is, the intermetallic compound Ir—Al in the Ir—Al alloy has the superior spark wear resistance of iridium having a high melting point and superior oxidation resistance of aluminum. This makes it possible to provide the spark plug having superior spark wear resistance, superior oxidation resistance and a long life.
Further, because the electrode chip in the spark plug contains 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum which is not a noble metal and is available on the commercial market at a low cost. This makes it possible to decrease the manufacturing cost of the spark plug as well as the electrode chips when compared with a conventional spark plug having an electrode chip which is comprised of noble metals only such as platinum Pt, rhodium Rh in addition to iridium which are available on the commercial market at a high cost.
The present invention provides the electrode chip and the spark plug having the superior spark wear resistance, superior oxidation resistance and a long life.
A preferred, non-limiting embodiment of the present invention will be described by way of example with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Hereinafter, various embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the following description of the various embodiments, like reference characters or numerals designate like or equivalent component parts throughout the several diagrams.
The spark plug according to the present invention has one or more electrode chips. Each electrode chip comprises 40 to 60 mol % of a total of aluminum Al and iridium Ir as a remainder thereof. It is acceptable for each electrode chip to further comprise not more than 0.5 mol % of a total of silicon Si and zinc Zn as incidental impurity.
In general, iridium has a melting point of approximately 2447° C. On the other hand, aluminum has a melting point of approximately 660° C. which is lower than the melting point of iridium. Accordingly, the melting point of the electrode chip can be changed by adjusting a content of aluminum in the electrode chip. In addition, an oxidation resistance of the electrode chip can be changed by adjusting the content of aluminum.
For example, when a content of aluminum in an electrode chip formed in a spark plug is less than 40 mol %, it is possible to suppress a decrease of a melting point of the electrode chip, but there is a possibility of it being difficult to maintain a necessary oxidation resistance.
On the other hand, when a content of aluminum in an electrode chip formed in a spark plug is more than 60 mol %, it is possible to increase the oxidation resistance, but decrease a melting point of the electrode chip. In this structure, there is a possibility of it being difficult to maintain a necessary spark wear resistance.
In addition, when a content of aluminum in an electrode chip formed in a spark plug is less than 40 mol % and more than 60 mol %, there is a possibility of decreasing a ratio in a content of intermetallic compound Ir—Al in Ir—Al alloy in the electrode chip. That is, for example there is a possibility of increasing a content of solid solution of iridium and aluminum as a phase other than the intermetallic compound Ir—Al. This has a possibility of it being difficult for the electrode chip to maintain both the spark ware resistance capability and the oxidation resistance.
Further, there is an intermetallic compound Ir—Al as a main phase of Ir—Al alloy main phase which forms the electrode chip. Still further, a solid solution of iridium and aluminum as a phase other than Ir—Al alloy is often contained in the electrode chip.
Still further, it is possible to photograph a cross section of the electrode chip by using an optical microscope or an electron microscope, and to calculate a ratio of an area of the intermetallic compound Ir—Al in the entire area of the cross section of the electrode chip in order to obtain the ratio of the intermetallic compound Ir—Al in the Ir—Al alloy.
Still further, it is possible for the electrode chip to contain at least one metal selected from nickel Ni, iron Fe, cobalt Co, platinum Pt and rhodium Rh within a range of 1 to 20 mol %, which replaces part of the iridium in the electrode chip.
In this case, the electrode chip in the spark plug according to the present invention is made of an alloy (Ir—Al-M alloy) in which part of the Ir—Al alloy having a body centered cubic lattice structure (BCC structure) as a crystal structure is replaced with at least one element selected from nickel, iron, cobalt, platinum and rhodium. This one element will be referred with the reference character “the element M”. The alloy forming the electrode chip contains the intermetallic compound Ir—Al-M comprised of iridium, aluminum and the element M as the main phase. This structure of the electrode chip makes it possible to suppress the generation of a phase such as a solid solution, etc. which is other than the intermetallic compound in the alloy which forms the electrode chip. Accordingly, it is possible to increase the ratio of the intermetallic compound in the alloy forming the electrode chip. This makes it possible to increase the spark wear resistance and the oxidation resistance of the electrode chip.
Still further, when a content of the element M, which replaces part of the iridium in the alloy forming the electrode chip, is less than 1 mol %, there is a possibility of suppressing the generation of a solid solution, etc. in the alloy forming the electrode chip, and of it being difficult to adequately obtain the effects to increase the ratio of the intermetallic compound in the alloy forming the electrode chip.
On the other hand, when the content of the element M is more than 20 mol %, because the content of iridium in the alloy forming the electrode chip is decreased and the melting point of the electrode chip is decreased, there is a possibility of it being difficult to adequately obtain the spark discharging wear resistance.
Still further, it is possible for the electrode chip according to the present invention to contain at least some nickel and rhodium instead of part of the iridium. This structure makes it possible to increase the ratio of the intermetallic compound in the alloy forming the electrode chip, and to further increase the spark wear resistance and the oxidation resistance of the electrode chip.
First Exemplary Embodiment
A description will be given of a spark plug 1 according to first and second exemplary embodiments to be used for internal combustion engines with reference to
A description will now be given of a detailed structure of each electrode chip 4 in the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment.
As shown in
The electric insulator 5 has a cylindrical shape. The electric insulator 5 is supported in the inside of the housing case 6. The center electrode 2 is supported in the inside of the electric insulator 5 so that the center electrode 2 is projected from the electric insulator 5 and exposed to the outside, i.e. a fuel mixture in the combustion chamber.
The earth electrode 3 is connected to a front end surface 60 of the housing case 6. As shown in
As shown in
Each of the center electrode base section 21 of the center electrode 2 and the earth electrode base section 31 of the earth electrode 3 is made of nickel alloy (Ni alloy).
Each of the electrode chip 4 of the center electrode 2 and the electrode chip 4 of the earth electrode 3 is made of 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum, and iridium as a remainder thereof. That is, the electrode chip 4 is comprised of an alloy (Ir—Al alloy) comprised of iridium and aluminum. In addition to containing iridium and aluminum, it is acceptable for the electrode chip 4 to contain not more than approximately 0.5 mol % of a total of Si and Zn as incidental impurity.
A description will now be given of actions and effects of the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment having the structure previously described.
In the structure of the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment, the electrode chip 4 is formed on the center electrode 2 and the electrode chip 4 is also formed on the earth electrode 3. In particular, the electrode chip 4 has a specified composition, i.e., contains 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum and iridium as a remainder thereof.
Because the electrode chip 4 is comprised of an alloy (Ir—Al alloy) of iridium and aluminum, and the content of aluminum has the previously-described range, an intermetallic compound composed of iridium and aluminum (an intermetallic compound Ir—Al) is present as a main phase in the Ir—Al alloy which forms the electrode chip 4.
The intermetallic compound Ir—Al which is a main phase in the Ir—Al alloy has a high melting point and has a superior oxidation resistance. That is, the intermetallic compound Ir—Al contained in the electrode chip 4 has a high melting point and a superior spark wear resistance of iridium and a superior oxidation resistance of aluminum. This makes it possible to provide the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment having both the superior spark wear resistance and the superior oxidation resistance. This makes it possible for the spark plug 1 to have a long life.
Further, the electrode chip 4 in the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment contains 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum which is a low cost material and easily available in the commercial market by a low cost. This makes it possible to reduce the manufacturing cost of the electrode chips 4 in the spark plug 1. For example, the electrode chips 4 in the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment can be produced with a low manufacturing cost when compared with the manufacturing cost of a conventional electrode chip which is made of noble metals such as iridium, platinum and Rhodium. That is, it is possible to manufacture the spark plug 1 having the electrode chips 4 according to the first exemplary embodiment with a low manufacturing cost.
As previously described, the first exemplary embodiment provides the spark plug 1, to be used for internal combustion engines, having a superior spark wear resistance, a superior oxidation resistance, and a long life.
Second Exemplary Embodiment
A description will be given of the spark plug 1 according to a second exemplary embodiment. Each of the center electrode 2 and the earth electrode 3 in the spark plug 1 according to the second exemplary embodiment has the electrode chip 4 which is different in content from the electrode chip 4 used in the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment.
That is, the spark plug 1 according to the second exemplary embodiment has the electrode chips 4, each of which is comprised of at least one metal selected from nickel, iron, cobalt, platinum and rhodium within a range of 1 to 20 mol %. That is, the electrode chip 4 in the spark plug 1 according to the second exemplary embodiment is comprised of 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum, 1 to 20 mol % of at least one type of metals selected from nickel, iron, cobalt, platinum and rhodium. The electrode chip 4 is further comprised of iridium as a remainder thereof.
Because other components of the spark plug 1 according to the second exemplary embodiment are the same of those of the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment, the explanation of those is omitted here.
In the second exemplary embodiment, the electrode chip 4 is comprised of an alloy (Ir—Al-M alloy) in which part of the Ir—Al alloy having a body centered cubic lattice structure (BCC structure) as a crystal structure is replaced with at least one element selected from nickel, iron, cobalt, platinum and rhodium. This one element will be referred with the reference character “the element M”. The alloy forming the electrode chip 4 is comprised of the intermetallic compound Ir—Al-M. The intermetallic compound Ir—Al-M is comprised of iridium, aluminum and the element M. This structure of the electrode chip 4 in the spark plug 1 according to the second exemplary embodiment makes it possible to suppress the generation of a phase such as a solid solution, etc. which is other than the intermetallic compound in the alloy which forms the electrode chip 4. Accordingly, it is possible to increase the ratio of the intermetallic compound in the alloy forming the electrode chip 4. This makes it possible to increase the spark wear resistance and the oxidation resistance of the electrode chips. Other actions and effects of the spark plug according to the second exemplary embodiment are the same as those of the spark plug according to the first exemplary embodiment.
Third Exemplary Embodiment
A description will be given of a third exemplary embodiment. In the third exemplary embodiment evaluated the wear resistance of each of test samples as the spark plug. The wear resistance is composed of the spark discharging wear resistance and the oxidation resistance.
The third exemplary embodiment used a plurality of electrode chips having a different composition shown in Table 1. The third exemplary embodiment prepared test samples S1 to S21, each of which has an electrode chip having a different composition. The third exemplary embodiment detected the spark discharging wear resistance and the oxidation resistance of each of the test samples S1 to S21.
Further, Table 1 shows a composition, a ratio of an area of an intermetallic compound in the electrode chip in each of the test samples S1 to S21. Incidental impurity is omitted from Table 1.
A description will now be given of the electrode chip used in each of the test samples S1 to S21.
The electrode chip in each of the test samples S2 to S4 contained 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum, and iridium as a remainder thereof. That is, the electrode chip in each of the test samples S2 to S4 corresponds to the electrode chip 4 used in the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment as previously described.
On the other hand, the electrode chip in the test sample S1 contained 70 mol % of aluminum which is more than 60 mol % of aluminum. The electrode chip in the test sample S5 contained 30 mol % of aluminum which is less than 40 mol % of aluminum.
The electrode chip in each of the test samples S2 to S4 contained 50 mol % of aluminum which is within a range of 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum, and 1 to 20 mol % of the element M which is at least one metal selected from nickel, iron, cobalt, platinum and rhodium, and iridium as a remainder thereof. In particular, part of the iridium is replaced with the element M in the electrode chip of each of the test samples S2 to S4. That is, the electrode chip in each of the test samples S2 to S4 corresponds to the electrode chip used in the spark plug according to the second exemplary embodiment as previously described.
On the other hand, the electrode chip in the test sample S9 contained 50 mol % of aluminum, and 30 mol % of nickel Ni which is more than 20 mol % of nickel Ni which replaces part of the iridium.
A description will now be given of a method of producing the electrode chip in each of the spark plugs as the test samples.
First of all, element powder such as iridium powder, aluminum powder, nickel Ni powder, iron Fe powder, cobalt Co powder, platinum Pt powder, rhodium Rh powder were mixed with a predetermined composition to make a raw mixture of the electrode chip.
Next, the raw mixture was melted over ten minutes by a plasma arc melting method using a maximum power of 7.5 kW, and dried to produce an ingot. The method used iridium powder of not less than 99.95% purity, platinum powder of not less than 99.95% purity, and rhodium powder of not less than 99.95% purity, and aluminum powder of not less than 95% purity, and nickel powder of not less than 99.8% purity.
Next, the produced ingot was annealed at a temperature of 1400° C. and over 72 hours in Argon Ar atmosphere. After the annealing process, the ingot was cut into parts having a predetermined size (having a diameter of 0.55 mm and an axial length of 0.8 mm). This produced the electrode chips having a cylindrical shape having a diameter of 0.55 mm and a length of 0.8 mm.
Next, a description will now be given of a method of detecting a ratio of an area of an intermetallic compound contained in the electrode chip in each of the test samples.
First of all, the electrode chip was cut in order to make a cut surface. The cut surface was polished by buffing.
Next, the polished surface of the electrode chip was photographed by an optical microscope or an electron microscope. A data processing software was executed to process the photographed image data. In other words, a binarization of the photographed image data was executed in order to distinguish an intermetallic compound phase from a solid solution phase. The ratio of an area of the intermetallic compound phase was calculated.
In
A description will now be given of a wear resistance test.
Each electrode chip was fixed to each of the center electrode and the earth electrode in the spark plug as each of the test samples S1 to S21 by laser welding.
Next, the spark plug as each of the test samples S1 to S21 was mounted to an internal combustion engine with straight six cylinders having an engine displacement of 2500 cc.
Next, the internal combustion engine was running at 5600 rpm per minutes (full load condition) over 100 hours. A gap length L of the spark discharging gap G (see
A description will now be given of the evaluation results of the wear resistance of each of the test samples S1 to S21.
As shown in Table 1, each of the test samples S2 to S4 containing 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum has the ratio of an area of an intermetallic compound of not less than 60%. Each of the test samples S2 to S4 has the evaluation result “B” of the wear resistance.
On the other hand, each of the test samples S1 and S5 containing 40 to 60 mol % of aluminum has the ratio of an area of an intermetallic compound of less than 60%. Each of the test samples S1 and S5 has the evaluation result “C” of the wear resistance.
As shown in Table 1, each of the test samples S6 to S8 and S10 to S21 containing 1 to 20 mol % of the element M, which replaces part of the iridium in the alloy, has the ratio of an area of an intermetallic compound of not less than 100%. That is, the alloy of each of the test samples S6 to S8 and s10 to S21 almost has an intermetallic compound phase, and does not have a solid solution phase. The test samples S2 to S4 have the evaluation result “A” or “B” of the wear resistance.
In particular, each of the test samples S6 to S8, S13 to S15, and S19 has the evaluation result “A” of the wear resistance, where part of the iridium is replaced with nickel Ni as the element M in the test samples S6 to S8, part of the iridium is replaced with rhodium Rh as the element M in the test samples S13 to S15, and part of the iridium is replaced with nickel Ni and rhodium Rh as the element M in the test sample S19.
On the other hand, the test sample S9 containing 1 to 20 mol % of the element M, which replaces part of the iridium in the alloy, has the ratio of an area of an intermetallic compound of less than 100%. However, the test sample S9 has the evaluation result “C” of the wear resistance.
As a result, it can be recognized that the spark plug according to the first exemplary embodiment, which corresponds to the test samples S2 to S4, has a high ratio of an area of the intermetallic compound (not less than 60%), and a superior wear resistance such as the spark discharging wear resistance and the oxidation resistance.
Further, it can also be recognized that the spark plug according to the second exemplary embodiment, which corresponds to the test samples S6 to S8 and S10 to S21, has a high ratio of an area of the intermetallic compound (100%), and a superior wear resistance such as a spark discharging wear resistance and the oxidation resistance. In particular, because part of the iridium is replaced with one or both of nickel Ni or rhodium Rh, the spark plug according to the second exemplary embodiment corresponding to each of the test samples S6 to S8 and S10 to S21 has superior wear resistance such as spark discharging wear resistance and the oxidation resistance. It is preferable for the electrode chip to have not more than 20 mol % of the element M which replaces part of the iridium.
Fourth Exemplary Embodiment
A description will now be given of an evaluation of the oxidation resistance of the spark plug with reference to
The fourth exemplary embodiments prepared test samples S31 to S39, each of which corresponds to an electrode chip having a different composition. A high temperature oxidation test was performed for each of the test samples S31 to S39 in order to evaluate the oxidation resistance of each of the test samples S31 to S39.
For example, the electrode chip of the test sample S31 corresponds to the electrode chip 4 in the spark plug 1 according to the first exemplary embodiment previously described, the electrode chip of the test sample S31 has the same composition of the test sample S3 used in the third exemplary embodiment. That is, the test sample S31 has the composition of 50 mol % of aluminum and iridium as a remainder thereof. In
The electrode chip of each of the test samples S32, S33, S34, S35, S36, S37 and S38 corresponds to the electrode chip in the spark plug according to the second exemplary embodiment previously described. That is, the electrode chips of the test samples S32, S33, S34, S35, S36, S37 and S38 have the same composition of the electrode chips of the spark plugs of the test samples S7, S8, S16, S17, s11, S14 and S19, respectively as shown in Table 1.
In addition, the electrode chip of the test sample S39 is a comparison sample having a composition of 17 mol % of rhodium Rh and iridium as a remainder thereof.
A description will now be given of the high temperature oxidation test. First, each of the test samples S31 to S39 (electrode chips) was placed in an electric furnace. Each of the test samples S31 to S39 was maintained at 1200° C. and over 50 hours under the atmosphere environment in the electric furnace. A mass (mg) of each of the test sample S31 to S39 was detected every time when 20 hours was elapsed and time when 50 hours was elapsed. A mass change c (mg/mm2) of each of the test samples S31 to S39 was calculated.
The mass change c (mg/mm2) was calculated by using the following equation:
c=(a2−a1)/b,
where a1 (mg) is a mass of the electrode chip before the high temperature oxidation test, a2 (mg) is a mass of the electrode chip after the high temperature oxidation test, and b (mm2) is a surface area of the electrode chip before the high temperature oxidation test.
The surface area b (mm2) of the electrode chip was calculated on the basis of a size of the electrode chip.
As can be understood from the evaluation result shown in
As a result, the electrode chip (which corresponds to the test sample S31) in the spark plug according to the first exemplary embodiment has a superior oxidation resistance.
Further, the electrode chip (which corresponds to each of the test samples S32 to S38) in the spark plug according to the second exemplary embodiment has a more superior oxidation resistance.
(Structural Modifications)
The spark plug 1 according to the first and second exemplary embodiments as previously described is comprised of the electrode chips formed on both the center electrode 2 and the earth electrode 3, as shown in
While specific embodiments of the present invention have been described in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that various modifications and alternatives to those details could be developed in light of the overall teachings of the disclosure. Accordingly, the particular arrangements disclosed are meant to be illustrative only and not limited to the scope of the present invention which is to be given the full breadth of the following claims and all equivalents thereof.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012-181583 | Aug 2012 | JP | national |
| 2013-059611 | Mar 2013 | JP | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5578894 | Oshima | Nov 1996 | A |
| 5811915 | Abe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5869921 | Matsutani et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6078129 | Gotou et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6094000 | Osamura et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6262522 | Osamura et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6628051 | Menken et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6846214 | Gotou et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
| 20030085644 | Sugiyama et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20040013560 | Hrastnik | Jan 2004 | A1 |
| 20050110381 | Kanao | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20090009048 | Yoshimoto et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
| 20110198983 | Manhardt et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
| 20130009538 | Yoshimoto et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1610199 | Apr 2005 | CN |
| 54-62923 | May 1979 | JP |
| 3-211248 | Sep 1991 | JP |
| 5-343157 | Dec 1993 | JP |
| 7-37672 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 7-37678 | Feb 1995 | JP |
| 7-180836 | Jul 1995 | JP |
| 7-235364 | Sep 1995 | JP |
| 9-7733 | Jan 1997 | JP |
| 9-298083 | Nov 1997 | JP |
| 11-3765 | Jan 1999 | JP |
| 2001-118660 | Apr 2001 | JP |
| 2001-203060 | Jul 2001 | JP |
| 2003-506835 | Feb 2003 | JP |
| 2003-142225 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2003-142226 | May 2003 | JP |
| 2004-011024 | Jan 2004 | JP |
| 2006-173141 | Jun 2006 | JP |
| 2009-16278 | Jan 2009 | JP |
| 2009-531541 | Sep 2009 | JP |
| 2009-245640 | Oct 2009 | JP |
| 2010-108939 | May 2010 | JP |
| 2010-138418 | Jun 2010 | JP |
| 2010-275575 | Dec 2010 | JP |
| 2011-018612 | Jan 2011 | JP |
| 2011-228250 | Nov 2011 | JP |
| Entry |
|---|
| Office Action (6 pages) dated Jan. 20, 2015, issued in corresponding Chinese Application No. 201310363324.7 and English translation (4 pages). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20140049151 A1 | Feb 2014 | US |
