The invention relates to arrangements for three-dimensional display, especially to such that provide a spatial impression to one or several viewers without any aids such as filter goggles.
Efforts to make images of objects, sceneries, views of the interior of bodies and other things appear to a viewer to have three dimensions have, in the course of development, resulted in a great number of autostereoscopic methods.
Some of these methods are based on the principle that several optical views of a scene or object recorded from different angles (“perspective views”), while displayed simultaneously, are separated by suitable means so that either eye of a viewer sees only one of these views, or several but different views, resulting in a parallax effect that makes the image appear spatial.
EP 0791847 describes an arrangement in which autostereoscopic presentations are made by means of an RGB LC display used in combination with obliquely positioned lenticulars, which, in principle, produces moiré patterns. To reduce the moiré pattern, the said publication suggests that the wavelength filters assigned to the subpixels be arranged in a different configuration. The implementation of this suggestion involves the disadvantage that alterations to tried-and-approved embodiments and manufacturing processes have to be made, which would be too expensive in view of industrial quantity production of the commonly used RGB LC displays. Moreover, the measure suggested does not eliminate the disadvantages in the case of two-dimensional presentations, so that there is no consistently high image quality when the arrangement is switched over from autostereoscopic to two-dimensional presentation. The said publication relates to an arrangement in which lenticulars are used to produce the autostereoscopic presentation.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,936,774, autostereoscopic display is based on structured light sources, which may be structured, e.g., according to their spectral properties. These interact with lens-like optical elements, which, for each perspective view, projects a group of light concentrations generated at certain distances onto specified regions of light modulators, e.g., LC displays. With these arrangements, the unfavorable effects described above also occur.
In JP 10333090, the authors suggest the use of colored illumination and wavelength filters for the directional selection of the light coming from the perspective views. An added optical filter is intended to reduce the light volume in specified wavelength ranges. This is a two-channel method based on only two perspective views, with either of the viewer's eyes being offered one of these views. According to the publication, the width of a filter element or that of an illumination element, respectively, is approximately twice the width of a subpixel in an LC display. Inevitably, this means that conventional LC cannot be used to produce the structured illumination, because the subpixel color structure of these displays is of the RGBRGBRGB . . . type. Moreover, the periodically arranged, stripe-shaped wavelength filters inevitably produce moire fringes again. An added disadvantage is the fixed distance from the image plane specified for the viewer, which derives from the equations and functions given.
JP 8163605 also describes an arrangement using two perspective views. Each of the pixels on which the views are presented is definitely visible to only one of the viewer's eyes. For directional selection of the light coming from the pixels, stripe-shaped wavelength filters are arranged in front of a display or a stripe-shaped RGB illuminating element. Here again, the disadvantages described above occur.
According to the description in JP 8146347, directional selection is effected by means of a separate transparent-opaque barrier corresponding with a wavelength filter, the transparent areas of the barrier, or the translucent areas of the wavelength filter are either slot-shaped or circular. The arrangement also has the disadvantages described above, and the same also applies to the arrangement described in JP 8146346, which uses a two-channel method with stripe-shaped wavelength filters for assigning directions to the two perspective views.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,568,313 describes an improvement of lenticular screens for 3D display by the attachment of a kind of added barrier extending all over the rear side of the lenticular. For 3D presentation, a picture assembled from stripes is placed below. The drawback is that the greater brightness achieved by imaging through a lenticular compared to imaging through a barrier is thwarted because of the added barrier extending over the entire rear side of the lenticular.
WO 01/56526 of the present applicant describes a method of spatial display achieved by means of a wavelength filter array (in special embodiments, by means of a gray level filter array) thanks to the definition of light propagation directions for light from different pixels, so that either of the viewer's eyes predominantly sees bits of partial image information from a particular selection from the views shown.
Based on the prior art described, it is the purpose of the present invention to achieve, with few optical components, an autostereoscopic presentation with improved perceptibility, and especially with high brightness.
According to the invention, the problem is solved by an arrangement for spatially displaying a scene or object,
Preferably, the structured plate is located in front of the image display device (in viewing direction), but it may also be arranged behind it.
Due to the structured plate used in it, the method in particular ensures that, with the partial use of lenses, cylinder lenses or prisms, the spatial image seen has a higher brightness than that achieved, for example, with a pure barrier method; and in so far as, at least partially, color or gray level filters are used, a sharply focused 3D image is produced.
The combination on the structured plate of lenses (preferably cylinder lenses) and color or gray level filters is, as it were, a synthesis of the well-known 3D presentation method based on lenticulars and that based on filter elements.
In the method according to the invention, the propagation directions can, in one version, be established in such a way that the said first and second selections made from the views Ak (k=1 . . . n) comprise exactly one view each, which, of course, is true for a few selected viewing positions only, as a rule. For a particular viewing position, the first and the second selection may, for example, exclusively comprise view 1 and view 3, respectively; a viewer would then see exclusively bits of partial information from view 1 with one eye and exclusively bits of partial information from view 3 with the other eye (and thus have a spatial impression).
In another version, the propagation directions may be established in such a way that the said first and second selections made from the views Ak (k=1 . . . n) each comprise several of the views Ak (k=1 . . . n), with one or several views jointly having a dominant share in each of the two selections.
For a particular viewing position, the first selection may, for example, simultaneously comprise view 1 (with a share of two thirds) and view 2 (with a share of one third), whereas the second selection comprises view 3 (with a share of two thirds) and view 4 (with a share of one third). A viewer would then see bits of partial information from view 1 (two thirds) and from view 2 (one third) with one eye and bits of partial information from view 3 (two thirds) and from view 4 (one third) with the other eye (and thus again have a spatial impression).
Preferably, the image display device is coupled with an electronic control system in such a way that bits of partial information from the views Ak (k=1 . . . n) are assigned to pixels αij of the position ij according to the equation
where
In principle, the assignment of bits of partial information from the views Ak (k=1 . . . n) to pixels αij may also be effected in the way described in the present applicant's WO 03/24122, i.e., one or several pixels αij are assigned partial image information that is a mix of bits of partial image information from two or more views.
Further, the optical imaging elements βpq are arranged on the structured plate according to their kind of imaging λb, pursuant to the equation
where
It should be noted here that in the above equation—just as in all further equations mentioned hereinafter—the expression multiplication of a matrix (here, e.g., dpq) by a number (here, e.g., q) does not, of course, mean a multiplication of the entire matrix with a scalar, as otherwise the result would be a matrix again. Rather, the (scalar) co-efficient entered in the matrix in the respective position (here, e.g., p,q) is multiplied by the respective number. The result is always a number.
Let us assume that, for example, bmax=5 kinds of optical imaging λb have been specified, with λ1 denoting imaging through a red filter, λ2 denoting imaging through a green filter, λ3 denoting imaging through a blue filter, λ4 denoting imaging through a filter essentially opaque (non-transparent) to visible light, and λ5 denoting imaging through a cylinder lens. Let us further assume that all optical imaging elements βpq on the structured plate are of rectangular shape; this makes up an orthogonal grid p,q on the structured plate. The area of an optical imaging element βpq is between several tens of thousands of square micrometers and several square millimeters, as a rule. With these assumptions, and with the further parameters dpq=−1 and nm=5, there would be arranged on the structured plate periodic, inclined stripes of red, green, blue and opaque filters, and cylinder lenses. In this example, the cylinder lenses have such a focal length that the grid of pixels approximately lies in the focal plane.
Even more favorable for 3D presentation is the case that a lens or cylinder lens horizontally extends over the size of several pixels αij. This case, too, is completely and unambiguously covered by the above equation for structuring the optical imaging elements βpq on the structured plate. For this purpose, a cylinder lens is segmented, with each lens segment corresponding to a separate kind of optical imaging λb. Thus, a cylinder lens extending over, say, three horizontally adjacent pixels αij would (by imagination) be broken down into three segments, and the three different segments would be assigned three different kinds of optical imaging λx, λx+1 and λx+2.
Unless such a whole cylinder lens is composed of Fresnel-like segments, the said cylinder lens segments should, of course, always be arranged side by side, as it is the case with a natural cylinder lens, i.e., in case of three lens segments, the left lens segment is left of the middle segment, and the right segment is right of the middle segment. In practical terms, only one (whole) lens or cylinder lens would be provided on the structured plate, while the splitting up into segments would be merely imaginary. The number of segments per lens may, of course, also be greater than three.
With regard to the plane of rows q and columns p, each optical imaging element βpq has an essentially polygonal, preferably rectangular, outline.
The distance z between the side of the structured plate facing the grid of pixels αij and the grid of pixels αij, measured along the viewing direction, is, for example, about 0 mm to 25 mm. Other distances z are possible, too. In particular, the substrate of a cylinder lens of the structured plate may directly rest on the image display device.
Preferably, the kinds λb of optical imaging elements βpq in the grid of rows q and columns p alternate from row to row and/or from column to column, or within the rows and/or columns.
The image display device provided may be a color LC display, a plasma display, an OLED display, an LED display, a front- or back-projection display, an electroluminescent display, or a laser-beam-illuminated display. Image display devices of other kinds are also feasible, of course.
Further, in a preferred embodiment, the area centers of at least two optical imaging elements βpq are shifted relative to each other in the direction of the rows q and/or columns p, by an amount that is not an integral multiple of the height of the rows q or the width of the columns p, respectively.
Moreover, it is sometimes of advantage if the optical imaging elements βpq on the structured plate are holographic-optical elements (HOEs).
Furthermore, the structured plate may be configured to be detachable from the image display device. Detaching the structured plate from the image display device is advantageous especially if the user wants purely two-dimensional image information or text to be displayed. The detachment of the structured plate from, and its re-attachment to, the image-display device are quasi-equivalent to a switching between 2D and 3D modes and vice versa, respectively.
Within the scope of the present invention, a method is proposed for fabricating a structured plate to be used in arrangements according to the invention, the said method comprising the following steps:
An alternative method to fabricate a structured plate comprises the following steps:
The first two steps in either of the two fabrication methods may be exchanged as well. Alternatively to exposing the filter, a filter array structure can be printed onto the substrate side of the lenticular screen. Further, it is possible to construct the structured plate from a number of layers.
Below, the invention is described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which
a is a sketch illustrating the design principle of a structured plate in arrangements according to the invention,
b is a sketch illustrating the principle of arranging different kinds λb of optical imaging elements βpq on the structured plate shown in
For the sake of clarity, the drawings are not to scale, as a rule, and they show only parts of the respective total views.
Let us assume that, in the embodiment examples described below, the image display device is a 15.1″ LCD of LG make with a full-color pixel pitch of 0.3 mm, on which there is made visible simultaneously a great number of individual pixels αij (here: the RGB color subpixels) in a grid of rows j and columns i, with the pixels αij presenting bits of partial information from several views Ak (k=1 . . . n) of the scene or object. Let us further assume, in this example, that the structured plate, by means of which propagation directions for the light radiated by the pixels αij are established, is always arranged in front of the image display device (seen in the viewing direction).
a is a sketch illustrating the principle of the design of a structured plate in arrangements according to the invention, this structured plate containing a great number of optical imaging elements βpq arranged in a grid of rows q and columns p and intended for establishing the said propagation directions. The structured plate simultaneously contains the following kinds λb of optical imaging elements βpq: wavelength filter (T, S) and cylinder lens (L). “T” denotes wavelength filters that are essentially transparent to visible light, and “S” such that are opaque. “L” denotes cylinder lenses, the horizontal dimension of which is, for example, about 8 times that of a wavelength filter here. This is indicated by the edges of the lenses (L). Let the axis of symmetry of all cylinder lenses (L) be vertical here; not every lens (L) is shown completely in
The optical imaging elements βpq are arranged on the structured plate according to their kind of imaging λb, pursuant to the equation already given above, viz.
where
With regard to the plane of rows q and columns p, each optical imaging element βpq has an essentially polygonal, preferably rectangular, outline, which is, for example, about 0.1 mm wide and 0.3 mm high. Preferably, the width and height are multiplied by a corrective factor 0.95<f<1. A matrix dpq that corresponds to
Preferably, the image display device is coupled with an electronic control system in such a way that bits of partial information from the views Ak (k=1 . . . n) are assigned to pixels αij in positions ij in accordance with the following equation
where
If the structured plate described above is provided in front of the said image display device, the said propagation directions are established in such a way that they, within a viewing space occupied by the viewer(s), intersect in a great number of intersection points, each of which corresponds to a viewing position, so that, from any of these viewing positions, a viewer sees bits of partial information from a first selection with one eye and bits of partial information from a second selection of views Ak (k=1 . . . n) with the other eye.
This is shown schematically in
It should be noted in addition that the lenses cause a visual magnification of the partial image information presented, so that—depending on the configuration of the lenses—several of the pixels visible in the rows j as shown in
Given the visibility conditions as shown in
It should further be noted that, in case of a structured plate as shown in
Corresponding to this,
Further embodiments of the structured plate are also feasible, including such using kinds of optical imaging that are not explicitly mentioned herein.
The invention improves the perceptibility of a 3D presentation on the basis of several views of a scene or object. Further it ensures a good brightness of the 3D image.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
103 25 146 | May 2003 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2004/005661 | 5/26/2004 | WO | 00 | 11/30/2005 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2004/107019 | 12/9/2004 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4594662 | Devaney | Jun 1986 | A |
4829365 | Eichenlaub | May 1989 | A |
4872750 | Morishita | Oct 1989 | A |
5083199 | Börner | Jan 1992 | A |
5113213 | Sandor et al. | May 1992 | A |
5132839 | Travis | Jul 1992 | A |
5264964 | Faris | Nov 1993 | A |
5349379 | Eichenlaub | Sep 1994 | A |
5519533 | Nomura et al. | May 1996 | A |
5550676 | Ohe et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5584556 | Yokoyama et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5703717 | Ezra et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5717522 | Hattori et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5729011 | Sekiguchi | Mar 1998 | A |
5751479 | Hamagishi et al. | May 1998 | A |
5777787 | Lüder et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5831765 | Nakayama et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5858624 | Chou et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5897184 | Eichenlaub et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5917562 | Woodgate et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5936774 | Street | Aug 1999 | A |
5938774 | Hsu | Aug 1999 | A |
5945965 | Inoguchi et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5949390 | Nomura et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6026215 | Fantone et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6040807 | Hamagishi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046849 | Moseley et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6055013 | Woodgate et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061083 | Aritake et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078423 | Orr et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6087766 | Janning | Jul 2000 | A |
6094216 | Taniguchi et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6118584 | Van Berkel et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6169629 | Otsubo | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6219184 | Nagatani | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266187 | Dunn et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6302541 | Grossmann | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309477 | Shimakura et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6337721 | Hamagishi et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6483644 | Gottfried et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6483735 | Rentzepis | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6504583 | Li et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6519088 | Lipton | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519379 | Izawa et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6791570 | Schwerdtner et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6859275 | Fateley et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6877857 | Perlin | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6970187 | Horimai et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6972744 | Allio | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6999110 | Kobayashi | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7046271 | Doerfel et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20020101658 | Hoppenstein | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030016444 | Brown et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030067460 | Tomono | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030067539 | Doerfel et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040130503 | Hamagishi et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040165263 | Sudo et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040245440 | Klippstein et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
195 02 643 | Aug 1996 | DE |
195 06 648 | Aug 1996 | DE |
198 27 590 | Dec 1999 | DE |
200 02 149 | May 2000 | DE |
100 15 796 | Oct 2001 | DE |
102 45 611 | Apr 2003 | DE |
0 316 465 | May 1989 | EP |
0 708 431 | Apr 1996 | EP |
0 744 872 | Nov 1996 | EP |
0 773 707 | May 1997 | EP |
0 791 847 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 860 728 | Aug 1998 | EP |
0 977 445 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1 069 454 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 122 957 | Aug 2001 | EP |
514426 | Mar 1939 | GB |
3-119889 | May 1991 | JP |
08036145 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08146347 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08163605 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08194190 | Jul 1996 | JP |
08327945 | Dec 1996 | JP |
08331605 | Dec 1996 | JP |
09015549 | Jan 1997 | JP |
09138370 | May 1997 | JP |
09281440 | Oct 1997 | JP |
09304739 | Nov 1997 | JP |
10026740 | Jan 1998 | JP |
10186272 | Jul 1998 | JP |
10268230 | Oct 1998 | JP |
10333090 | Dec 1998 | JP |
2000201360 | Jul 2000 | JP |
2001033731 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001042258 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2001073162 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2002040956 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002072135 | Mar 2002 | JP |
2002202477 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002287087 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002287088 | Oct 2002 | JP |
2002287089 | Oct 2002 | JP |
WO 9406049 | Mar 1994 | WO |
WO 9702709 | Jan 1997 | WO |
WO 9722033 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO 9827451 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO 9949349 | Sep 1999 | WO |
WO 0010332 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0028517 | May 2000 | WO |
WO 0043831 | Jul 2000 | WO |
WO 0131384 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0137579 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0156265 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0177894 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0219012 | Mar 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20060256435 A1 | Nov 2006 | US |