Patent Grant
7822284
An apparatus and method is shown for modifying the creation and/or presentation of image information displayed, printed or created on a raster or matrix image or graphic, display or printer, thereby increasing the apparent image quality. Means for deriving a plurality of neighboring image elements or elements of the video signal which neighbor in time or space to a common location, and means for determining the image elements replication at such location in response thereto, are also shown. Particular embodiments relation to increasing the apparent temporal and spatial resolution of raster scanned television computer and permanent copy devices are shown.
This invention relates to increasing the apparent temporal or spatial resolution of a created and/or displayed image which is typically produced by ordered groups of elements such as by a raster or matrix element or device, without a required increase in the number of image elements of the image. This present application is a continuation-in-part of co-pending application U.S. Ser. No. 08/119,610 filed Sep. 13, 1993 entitled Apparatus and Method for Spatial Scan Modulation of a Video Display which application is a continuation of application U.S. Ser. No. 07/355,461 filed May 22, 1989 which is now abandoned. The Notice of Allowance for U.S. Ser. No. 08/119,610 was mailed to applicant on Dec. 22, 1994 and the issue fee has been timely paid. The content of U.S. Ser. No. 08/119,610 is incorporated by reference.
As television, computer, graphics, printers, fax machines and related image technology develops, there is increasing emphasis on improving the quality of created, displayed, or stored images in order that they appear more real and pleasing to the human observer. Two of the parameters which affect image quality, and therefore are subject to improvement, are spatial and temporal resolution. Spatial resolution, simply put, is the number of image elements which are used to make up an image, normally static, and correspondingly, temporal resolution is the number of elements per unit time which make up an image, normally moving. Desirable qualities of an image system, such as television camera, scanner, broadcast television, computer display printer, permanent copy-device, etc. will ideally include having as many elements per image or frame and, in the case of moving images, as many elements or frames per unit time as is economically feasible. Unfortunately, increasing the number of image elements per frame or the number of frames per second is a costly improvement. Therefore many schemes have been developed to improve the resolution of the image, while reducing the number of elements used.
Other improvement systems, such as various Scanner Interpolation Techniques, improved Definition Television Systems (IDTV), Advanced Television Systems (ATV), and High Definition Television Systems (HDTV), Hewlett Packard's Laser Printer Resolution Enhancement System, and other Image Enhancers typically operate to increase the resolution and other quality related aspects of image systems. Many of these systems resort to various techniques for such quality improvements, some of which generate unwanted artifacts.
It is an object of this invention to provide an apparatus and method for improving the apparent quality of a created and/or displayed image by altering the size, shape or position of the elements of the image.
It is an object of this invention to allow usage of a low resolution camera and/or recorder in a high resolution video distribution and/or display system.
It is another object of this invention to provide an apparatus and method to alter the size, shape or position of the elements of a scanned or presented image in response to the relationship between a plurality of elements of the image.
It is a yet further object of this invention to provide a means and method for inspecting a plurality of elements of an image to determine the presence of a need for filling of areas between the elements.
It is yet another object of this invention to provide a means and method for simultaneously providing a plurality of elements of said image for inspection and comparison means to determine proper altering of areas between the elements or voids created by defective or unneeded elements.
It is an additional object of this invention to provide a means and method for inspecting a certain element or location with respect to one or more surrounding or neighboring elements of an image to determine the desirability for changing the shape, position or size of other elements to improve the spatial and/or temporal resolution relationship between the elements, which may neighbor in time or space.
It is an additional object of this invention to provide a means and method for inspecting neighboring elements with respect to one or more other elements of an image to determine a need for changing the shape, position or size of elements to improve the spatial or temporal resolution relationship with the other elements, especially when one other element is defective.
It is yet still another object of this invention to provide a means and method to improve the quality of an image by inspecting a plurality of neighboring elements to generate replication elements in response thereto.
It is a further object of this invention to provide a means for replicating non-defective image elements while producing no ascertainable artifacts.
It is still yet another object of the invention to apply the above objects to any physical phenomena or signal which can be represented as a matrix of discrete elements.
It is still another object of this invention to provide an image creation device utilizing the above objects.
According to an aspect of this invention, the inventive concepts disclosed herein show an apparatus and method for modifying the creation storage and/or production of an image by device in response to the image content thereof as carried by an image bearing signal, in order to create an image having apparently higher quality than normal.
The preferred embodiment of the present invention describes a neighboring element means for providing a plurality of neighboring elements, and an element replication means responsive to said plurality of neighboring elements to selectively fill a location, which may be a void, or artifacts, between elements, or to replace elements in the spatial or time dimensions or both. The inventive concepts disclosed herein may be utilized to improve the apparent resolution of the created and/or displayed image spatially, temporally, or both, or to conceal, by replication including modification, and/or creation of otherwise non-existent, defective or unneeded image elements or artifacts. The invention will find considerable use in the reduction of spatial or temporal (motion) artifacts of improved television systems like HDTV.
It will be understood that the term image as used herein is meant to apply to the creation and/or presentation of any phenomena by a raster or matrix of discrete or adjoining elements, and that the raster or matrix may be either a single one, or a given one of a plurality or sequence of rasters or matrices, for example as used in temporal portraits of such physical phenomena. The image can be visible on a display (such as a computer monitor or regular television set), viewable after creation (such as a laser printer or fax machine) or otherwise exist (such as in memory for subsequent use or on a recorder tape). The term image is applicable to the creation of an image (for example at a low resolution to camera); on recording (for example on a VHS machine for HDTV transmission), on receipt (for example NTSC reception on an HDTV monitor) or otherwise.
It will be further understood that invention has application to a group, or series of such elements, whether transmitted or stored, in time sequential or parallel arrangement or in any other form. The more important aspect of the invention is the operations on the elements which have some spatial or temporal coherence or probability of similarity. It is of lesser importance what the elements represent or how the elements are conveyed, or of the particular nature or make up of the form of the elements.
It will be also understood that although the word void is used in this specification, the invention is directed towards replicating new image information utilizing neighboring image elements, which new image information is utilized at a certain location(s). These locations might or might not have previously had image information available therefor. The void may exist at the point of image creation, before/after storage and/or at the point of presentation. Examples of voids would include such things as defects, unwanted elements, improper elements, corrupted elements, valid but replaceable elements, locations with no image information, and/or other locations or elements which may be in question or need for improvement. The term void is used to cover all these and similar situations for uniformity.
It will also be understood that although the word combination “filling in” is used in the specification and claims, the invention is directed towards replicating an image element at a particular location—again, an image element which might or might not have previously had information available therefor. This replication includes creating, modifying, replacing, substituting, adding to, providing and/or filling in for the element at this location. This term filling in is used to cover all these and similar situations for uniformity.
It will also be understood that although the word “similarity” is used in the specification, the invention is directed towards the use of any of the various element characteristics to determine similarity, which characteristics can be used alone or in combination thereof. For example, the elements both may be of the same color, but of different brightness; they both may be of same brightness, but of different hue; they both may be of the same luminescence but of different color saturation; they both may be of same saturation and luminescence; they both may be the same size; they both may have the same relationship to their surroundings; or otherwise be similar in some one or combination of characteristics. Characteristics by which similarity can be determined include color, hue, color saturation, luminescence (brightness), size, detail, pattern, spatial frequency component in horizontal or vertical or diagonal or time or other dimensions, temporal frequency, content, relationship of neighboring elements, noise, and/or other external measures such can be derived from a detection circuit which would provide a flag or measure and/or other indication that an element or group of elements are suitable for processing. The element or location which is being processed may or may not be a valid or erroneous element: It might even have had no image information or not previously existed.
It will also be understood that although the word “replication” is used in the specification, the invention is directed towards modifying, correcting, improving, substituting for, adding to, replacing or otherwise processing the image so as to provide for an overall, more pleasing or apparently higher quality image. As previously set forth the word “fill in” is used in this specification for similar attributes as replication.
It should be understood that the word “surrounding” is used in this specification to describe elements which have some relationship to other image elements, be the relationship spatial or temporal. The word surrounding could include elements which are neighboring on one side thereof, neighboring on all sides, adjacent thereto, spaced from diagonally with intervening elements between (such as in a interlaced field scan device wherein alternating fields are paired), immediately adjacent or spaced elements which have a statistical ability of being similar, or merely elements that have a greater than minimal statistical probability of being similar. However, in respect to this latter it is preferred that the percentage of similarity, is over 50%.
It should be understood that the invention has application during the creation of an image (for example at a video camera), at the storage of an image (for example before or after a video tape or disk) and/or in the production of an image (for example a video monitor).
The objects and features of the invention will be apparent to one skilled in the art from a consideration of the following description and claims, when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The structure, operation, and advantages of the presently disclosed preferred embodiment of the invention will become apparent when consideration of the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings wherein:
a shows a typical prior art scanned image display with a portion,
a shows a typical scanned image display a would occur with the use of the present invention, with a portion,
This display device normally contains an amp 2a which receives, clamps, amplifies and couples the signal to the display element 6a, which is most commonly a CRT or modulated laser but which also could be modulated LED's or LCD's or other image creation device.
The device shown is a video device also contained in the device 1a is a sync circuit 3a which receives the signal, strips the composite sync therefrom, separates the composite sync into H and V components and couples these components to the H scan 4a and V scan 5a circuits respectively. The scan circuits 4a and 5a provide the scanning control of the display element 6a, for example by providing the ramp drive waveforms to the CRT yoke or displacing the laser beam, or modulating the imaging devices suitable modifications would have to be made for an image creation device like a camera.
It will be recognized by one skilled in the art that the device shown by way of simple example in
One skilled in the art will be able to utilize the present invention with any of the many image creation, recording, memory and/or display devices which utilize ordered groups of image elements to eventually set forth image phenomena as are known in the art.
The description given herein is by way of example with primary respect to a video monitor. As previously mentioned, video refers to the groups of elements irrespective of their use or-form of existence or creation and will be understood to mean such even though described with primary respect to television elements.
Delay will be understood to encompass deriving different elements in time and/or space by a variety of well known means, including the specific example of delaying a time sequential series of image elements.
The element replication means 9 provides a V fill signal to the V scan circuit 5b in response to the plurality of neighboring elements from 8 in order to cause a vertical filling or dithering of the element scan or addressing at the proper times. The spatial scan modulator 7 therefore operates to determine where voids or elements to be replicated exist between elements or are created between or on elements by defective elements, and how these voids (as previously defined) are to be filled in in the image. This determination made by an inspection of a plurality of neighboring elements, and then causing the creation and/or display device to replicate, fill, replace, or otherwise modify the appropriate location in response to the fill signal. Shown as optional is an H fill signal provided by 9 and coupled to 4b to cause horizontal filling, and a further optional video fill provided by 9 and coupled to 2b to cause modulation or filling. The device can also be utilized to replicate non-defective image elements with no ascertainable artifacts (again the term void covers all situations).
As with the various display and creation devices known in the art, the fill signals (as previously defined) provided by 9 will take on different connections to the devices 2b, 4b and 5b, resulting from the differences in those devices.
It is the object of the fill signals from 9 to cause the appropriate filling of locations in the image by whatever means is suitable for the particular imaging device being used, whether during creation, recording, and/or presentation of the image. These locations which may be voids in the image which may be filled with all or a portion of a element, or all portions of combinations of elements, or otherwise as will be described in greater detail later, especially with respect to the specific video display embodiment
In the present example, the voids or element locations are filled by slightly dithering the example electron, light beam or other imaging device away from its normal scan position by manipulation of the sweep circuits of the scan circuitry during creation and/or presentation of the image element.
For a light beam type device the voids may be filled by dithering, modulating or focusing the beam. For addressing type devices the dithering may be accomplished by manipulating addressing and filling as may be accomplished by such dithering. In all devices, filling may be caused by modification of existing elements.
For the device described by way of example, the V fill signal will cause the electron, light beam, imaging or creation device to be modulated vertically, either upward, downward or sideways or both to cause given scan line to become wider in an upward, downward, sideways and/or all directions. In a video circuit this can be simply accomplished by adding or subtracting a small amount of high frequency pulsating current in the sweep or scanning driver circuit in a video circuit, thus broadening the electron or laser beam slightly upward or downward from its normal position on the face of the CRT or photo sensitive surface. Similarly, the H fill signal can cause a slight horizontal displacement of the beam position by adding or subtracting a small amount of high frequency current from the H sweep or scanning driver circuit. In order to accomplish diagonal or angular displacement of the electron beam, a modulation of both H and V deflection circuits may be made. Such modulation of the electron beam position is relatively easy to accomplish in terms of circuitry requiring only a bidirectional current source, or a pair of unidirectional current sources, which are switched on and off at high frequency rate in response to the fill signals, and add or subtract current in the sweep or scanning circuit, thereby slightly modulating the current flowing in the driver and thus altering the electron beam deflection. The operation thus causes a dither of the beam modulation, which will be explained in greater detail with respect to
In alternate creation/presentation circuits the signals to/from various circuits would be appropriately modified.
The beam modulation of any image conveying beam such as electron or light can also be achieved by changing the deflection, intensity, shape, duration, focus or astigmatism of the beam, and/or scanning, thereby changing the spot size and/or shape. The modulation of the conveying beam may be caused to take place in various directions as well, for example in diagonal directions, in response to the pixel replication means 9. Such improvements will be understood and may be made by one skilled in the art in view of the present teachings.
The art of changing electron beam deflection by small amounts has been previously practiced, for the purpose of geometric scan correction. In general the exact method of effecting the modulation of the display will be determined by the nature of the display printing, or imaging device; however, one skilled in the art will be able to devise proper circuitry to practice the present invention for a given desired type of creation and/or display device, in view of the teachings herein.
The fill signal may be utilized to generate the desired elements (which may be including additional elements replication) on the input signal in response to 9, with or without scan modulation, thus providing elements to fill in the desired blank areas of the image (which may be blank as in voids, unneeded, unwanted, or otherwise).
Filling may be accomplished by simply adding the fill signal to the signal in a monitor device so that the electron beam is caused to illuminate the CRT phosphor in response to the fill signal as well as the signal.
Illumination may be caused to occur in the absence of a signal generated illumination, or may cause the signal generated illumination to be modified, such as by being increased or decreased. The image fill signal may also be utilized to perform other image functions as will become apparent, such as reducing the bandwidth of the signal, or by changing the element or spot size for example by de-focusing the electron beam, repeating a displayed element, or generating a new element (especially in non-direct scanning devices).
New elements used for filling of voids including the substitution or replication of existing elements may be comprised of all or a portion of a element or group of elements.
a shows a typical scanned image 10a (whether creation and/or reproduction) with a small portion 11a which is expanded for clarity in
With more modern creation and/or presentation devices the modification is more theoretical-occurring in electronic form during and/or after creation instead of during presentation.
Scan line 12a has seven illuminated element points 16a through 16g identified for clarity. As with many systems, the individual elements typically blend together when sequentially aligned along a scan line, due to both the width of the beam, and the limited bandwidth of the video amplifiers in the device, giving rise to the continuous highlighted areas shown. It will be understood that the individual elements may also represent a matrix display rather than a scanned display. The four scan lines show a diagonal bright area which can be seen to take on a rather stair stepped appearance. The stair stepping and the space between the scanning lines make up picture artifacts that viewers find objectionable in viewing the image, whether created during creation and/or presentation.
It is one object of the present invention to fill in the voids of the stair stepping and voids between consecutive scanning lines, for example by modulating the scanning of the electron beam in a video device, thus reducing these objectionable artifacts.
a shows the same display 10b as 10a in
Illuminated elements 17a-g corresponding to 16a-g in
With respect to
It can be seen from inspection of
It may be noted that an object of the present invention is to provide a method of filling voids without restriction to the nature of how such voids arise, although it will be appreciated that the nature of such filling may very will be optimized in response to the nature of the void and that the voids might discard valid image elements at the involved location. For example the filling of voids between elements may be performed differently than the filling of voids created by defective elements. As another example, assuming 18f were defective due to a defective video element, the element may be replaced to cure the defect. If, on the other hand, the element for 18f were not defective by itself, the artifacts produced by a defective florescent element, the location could be filled by lighting, or increasing the lighting of the neighboring elements. Further, the invention may be utilized to replicate valid, non-defective image elements due to the probability of similarity. This allows continual processing of a signal through a circuit without on/off switching while producing minimal artifacts.
As with the previous example of
Note that for the left two elements the deviation takes place both above and below the line. In the preferred embodiment of the invention the electron beam or memory laser path is such that the track pitch, the spacing between the points where the track crosses the normal scan line, is less than the electron or reproduction beam width. Therefore the electron or beam width will illuminate a solid area. The illuminated area created by the beam path shown in 20 is shown as a solid are in 21. It will be noted that the ability to fill in chosen directions only, such as only up to 21, is an important feature.
A note should be made about the relative brightness of the spatially modulated scan of 21 versus the area of the prior art scan 19. The brightness of a given area is a function of the flux density of the electron, light beam or image signal striking that area, that is a given number of electrons or photons or other image creating energy will tend to provide a given number of photons of visible light or particles of dye or pigment, independent of the area which it strikes. For a given electron or beam-intensity, the area of 21 will therefore appear dimmer in terms of visible photons or particles per unit area than the area of 19. If a given spatial scan modulated area of the image is large enough to be resolved as a distinct element, the viewer may notice this decreased intensity. In order to overcome this decreased brightness, it will be desirable to increase the intensity of the image creating beam, therefore restoring proper brightness in those areas where the spatial modulation is occurring. The brightness increase will typically be a function of the amount of modulation. For example while the beam is modulated only upward for the left two elements of 20, a first given increase should be made, and for the remaining elements where the beam is modulated both up and down with a second, higher, increase made. This increase in beam intensity can be made in response to element replication means 9 shown in
Alternate imaging devices would similarly operate, albeit with adaptations for their special properties. For example, with a LED or LCD imaging device (such as a printer), modifications of the brightness of successive lines of image information and/or the modulation of the image elements in what would otherwise be spaces between lines would be one way to produce the image improvement of the present invention.
For the described scan, elements A-D will have occurred in time before X, and elements E-H occur in time after X. The 9 elements are all made simultaneously available to the elements replication by the neighboring elements means (8 of
A device which can be utilized for the neighboring elements means function is described, with respect to FIGS. 9 and 10, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,070 issued Feb. 25, 1986. Other arrangements and circuits to perform this function will be apparent to one skilled in the art from the present disclosure, for example, retrieving elements from RAM as in matrix displays. In order that elements X can be the about to be currently displayed elements, it is necessary that neighboring elements means make elements available to the display device, which is shown by the connection from 8 to 2b and 3b of
Element X may well be replicated from any direction, including those of the third dimension, which would represent a frame to frame or time direction, or a combination of time and spatial dimensions. Replication in the time dimension is useful in improving motions artifacts. Time replication is accomplished by using delays of one picture period (field or frame in a monitor device) or more to provide elements in the time axis, which may be used to fill temporal voids. It is particularly useful in a video imaging device.
Element X will thus be modulated in response to elements which are present in field or frames other than the one containing X. U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,070 which is incorporated herein by reference describes more fully various embodiments of neighboring elements means which may be suitable for use in this fashion, and particular
It will be immediately recognized that by comparing elements on the opposite sides of X, it is possible to determine which pair of surrounding or neighboring elements which are most similar. The most similar pair thus represents the pair of image elements most likely to provide the least noticeable replication value for an element X, and also indicate the direction(s) of modulation of X to fill voids adjacent thereto. For example if A-B=9, B-G=7, C-F=8, and D-E=3, the preferred pair of elements for replicating X would be pairs D and E and either could be chosen for replication. Alternatively, a normalized combination of the two pairs such as an average can be used.
This logic holds true if in fact X is related to elements on two opposite sides. However X may be related only to the elements in the corners, that is to elements A, B, and D (upper left), B, C, and E (upper right), E, H, and G (lower right), or G, H, and D (lower left). The logic conditions shown below thus preferably takes all eight conditions into account, selecting the lowest difference pair of opposite or corner elements to determine the direction(s) of modulation of X, to fill voids adjacent to X, or giving the direction or pair of elements most likely to provide the least noticeable replication value for an element X in
For the purpose of the present description and the purpose of explanation, it will be assumed that only the two dimensions, and the replication directions indicated by the 7 differences are to be considered.
A group of similar elements is easily implemented by logic operations as may be utilized to determine which if any of the 8 spatial replication directions should be enabled for a given elements X. Logic operations that may be used to enable the modulations according to the following table include:
The element replication 26 contains a rank logic means 28 which cooperates to inspect the 9 neighboring elements A-H and X presented on lines 30A-H and X respectively, and provides a fill signal on line 32 and replaces signals on line 36 respectively, which device operates to control the spatial modulation of element X. It should be noted that in
As will be apparent from the present teachings, many of the functions of the present invention can be implemented with various forms of hardware including ASICS, programmable logic and analog or optical circuitry and software running on any of the various well known platforms. For example, microprocessors with suitable software may be utilized. As a further example, a read only memory may be utilized. In particular, a ROM or programmable logic would be well suited to implement part or all of the elements replication means 26.
The determination of which neighboring elements are related to element X is a ranking process, which is described in one form in some detail in the aforementioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,070 with respect to video noise reduction. The '070 patent does describe and claim the replication of defective elements, for example at column 4 line 49 et. seq. and column 8 line 45 et. seq. The ranking circuitry shown in
Further the rank logic means may also operate to rank elements in respect to their dissimilarity, thus not utilizing elements that do not meet a minimum criteria for similarity ranking. This recognizes that elements that are known to be largely dissimilar do not have to be ranked for similarity. This provides considerable saving (of most particularly processing time) and circuit complexity since the complexity of calculations increases exponentially as to the number of elements utilized. Preferably therefore the ranking of elements would be a multiple-step process: first discard dissimilar groups of elements not sufficiently similar in respect to each other and/or other sets so as to not warrant subsequent processing providing at least one set remains and then second ranking of the groups of similar elements. A threshold to establish similarity is particularly effective in the initial step.
Note that more than two elements may be compared in a group, for example groups of 3 or more may be compared. For example, group ABD, BCE, EHG, and GFD may be compared to determine the total difference, for example A−B+A−D+B−D as the difference for ABD.
As an example, assume that the element pairs have the following ranks:
From the above chart it can be seen that pairs P, Q, and S are closest thus indicating element X is most likely related to a diagonal from element A to H. The three closest elements will be identified as A and H, and of the above logic equations the following will be satisfied:
VERT
HORIZ
L. DIAG
These equations being satisfied, the modulate VERT signal, and modulate HORIZ signal, and modulate LEFT DIAGONAL signal will be activated. As a result of the above analysis, the void between elements A, B, D, and X and E, G, H, and X would be caused to be replicated by spatial modulation of elements X if X were not defective. Alternatively, the voids and/or element X could be replicated by elements A, B, D, and E, G, and H, or combinations thereof respectively. As an improvement to the spatial modulation, the amplitude or spatial intensity of the modulation may be changed in response to the ranking of the neighboring elements. For example, if the difference between X and A is small, a large amplitude of modulation is used; and if the difference were large, a small modulation used. The amount of modulation is therefore caused to vary in response to the difference, in either spatial or temporal embodiments. Of course, intensity or other attribute modulation may also be provided as well, as previously discussed. Additionally, if element X is defective or unneeded, it may be deleted, thus creating a void, and the void may be replicated with a combination of those element pairs having the closest values, in the above example, pair A-H or Pairs A-H and B-G. For a continually operating device, element X could be replicated even if not defective.
It is important to note that by ranking the various element pair differences P-W that a very accurate prediction of the value of X may be made in the event X is defective. By inspecting the differences and their ranking, the individual surrounding elements, in space and time, which are most closely associated with X may be determined with a high probability. A combination of a plurality of those most closely associated elements may then be utilized to replace element X, to fill any voids near a good or defective X, or even to totally replace a valid element X (which would treat X as a void irrespective of its true nature).
Such combinations which have proven suitable for use include any of the various averages which are well known, including arithmetic and geometric averages, means, medians, weighted combinations, spatial and temporally filtered combinations and various interpolations and curve fittings. It has also been found that selecting a single element from the group of most closely associated elements to use for fill or replication works quite well. In particular, choosing a median value element of the most similar group has been shown to offer quite good performance. In particular, choosing the two most closely associated groups of elements, and choosing one of the two median elements of the groups, the one closest to the average of the four, has been found to give quite good performance.
In summary then, the preferred operation begins by selecting a location for image enhancement. This location may be anywhere in the image including along the edges and corners thereof. Once the location is ascertained, the plurality of groups of two or more elements having a relationship to the location are ascertained. These groups may be adjoining, neighboring, having a theoretical similarity, and may be present with a time or space variable or combination thereof. After the groups are ascertained, each image element in the group is compared to the other elements in the same group to determine the similarity or how closely the individual elements within each group match. Note it is possible for a single element to be in more than one group. This similarity is preferably typically determined by the absolute value of A minus B or similar function (to increase operating speed and reduce circuit/software complexity). This comparison could include a preliminary dissimilarity threshold which would in operation not process elements which are significantly dissimilar to other sets or to a predetermined theoretical or percentage value of difference. This dissimilarity threshold could be by ranking of the groups of elements or by comparison of the differences between image elements in each group.
Once the similarity within each group has been ascertained, the similarity of each group is compared to the similarity of all the other groups to ascertain which groups have the most closely matching image elements or most similar image elements. This can be accomplished by sequentially comparing the similarity of each group to a subsequent group, discarding the most dissimilar before repeating the process, by ranking the groups outright according to their similarity, or otherwise.
Once the most similar group, or groups, have been ascertained, then one or more elements within the most similar group are used to generate a replication value for use at the particular location. The image element(s) chosen can be one of the most similar pair, an average of the most similar pair, an average of the image elements in a group of closely related image elements, an average of the most similar of the image elements within groups of associated image elements, an average of all of the image elements within the associated groups or otherwise. Further, the image elements can be replacing an otherwise valid image element, replacing a defective image element, or filling in empty spaces in time or space around the location. All this is separate of the need to determine whether or not whatever may exist at the particular location is defective, or missing since replication provides very good estimate of the noise free value of a given image element at a particular location.
The new element X would be the value calculated for element X as described above, which is stored in a field or other memory matrix and displayed in the prior time or space sequence by the display element. Alternately, the new elements could be a calculated value derived from a plurality of the elements, as will be discussed with respect to
Referring to
Assuming, for another example, that
One skilled in the art will realize that the one field delay 31 will be required to make available at H, the previous field scanning line above the present field scanning line available at E. It should be noted that in many interlaced systems, the actual length of the delay will vary by one line from field to field, depending on whether the even or odd field is being delayed. In the use of the N.E.C. UPD41221 I.C., the proper alignment of input and delayed video is simply accomplished by use of the increment (INC) and decrement (DEC) controls. One skilled in the art will however, be able to construct such a delay, as is well known in the art. When used with matrix or other types of non time scanned video, RAM memories may be substituted as will be known from these teachings.
Of course the invention may be utilized with digital data, such as in D1 or D2 digital video or with fax, modem or laser printer data as will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art from the teachings herein. The invention is particularly useful with compressed data, and provides considerable image enhancement and reduction of both random noise and defective elements noise for such digital images, especially for JPEG and MPEG compression systems.
In order to make elements X available in analog form for use by a display element, as shown in
The rank values from each ranking PROM are coupled to the fill logic circuit 28, which in the preferred embodiment is made up of PROM I.C.s. The fill or replication logic circuit 29 generates the previously discussed replication signals and/or chooses appropriate matching elements in response to the 8 rank values. The replication signals are then coupled to replication circuit of 35 in
While the above preferred embodiment of the invention has been described by way of example, many other embodiments may be utilized to operate in a given video system. For example the invention may be utilized with interlace scanning systems, or with multiple channel displays such as RGB color displays. A matrix of less or more than the suggested 9 elements may be utilized, which picture elements may be adjacent or non-adjacent, and may be symmetrically or non-symmetrically chosen. To one skilled in the art it will be apparent from the present teachings that there are numerous variations, configurations and embodiments of the above described invention which variations may be tailored into a specific embodiment to maximize effectiveness with a particular display device and video system without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.
This is a Continuation of application Ser. No. 09/573,284 filed May 18, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,870,964 which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 08/119,610 filed Sep. 13, 1993 (now U.S. Pat. 5,424,780 issued Jun. 13, 1995) which claims the benefit of and is a continuation of Ser. No. 07/355,461, filed May 22, 1989 (now abandoned) priority of which are hereby claimed.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2921128 | Gibson | Jan 1960 | A |
| 3009016 | Graham | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3479453 | Townsend | Nov 1969 | A |
| 3568163 | Osborne | Mar 1971 | A |
| 3573789 | Sharp et al. | Apr 1971 | A |
| 3680076 | Duffek et al. | Jul 1972 | A |
| 3700812 | Springett | Oct 1972 | A |
| 3718833 | Martone et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3737855 | Cutara | Jun 1973 | A |
| 3786478 | King, Jr. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3788478 | King, Jr. | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3789133 | Kline | Jan 1974 | A |
| 3875584 | Fletcher | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3878536 | Gilliam | Apr 1975 | A |
| 3914538 | Perreault et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
| 3921164 | Anderson | Nov 1975 | A |
| 3946266 | Saito et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
| 3949166 | Fuse | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3952296 | Bates | Apr 1976 | A |
| 3961223 | Ray et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
| 3969716 | Roberts | Jul 1976 | A |
| 3980819 | Schwartz | Sep 1976 | A |
| 3995108 | Morrison | Nov 1976 | A |
| 4009334 | Sypula | Feb 1977 | A |
| 4018990 | Long et al. | Apr 1977 | A |
| 4032977 | Liao | Jun 1977 | A |
| 4034408 | Starkweather | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4038668 | Quarton | Jul 1977 | A |
| 4047248 | Lyman et al. | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4050084 | Rossi | Sep 1977 | A |
| 4058836 | Drewery | Nov 1977 | A |
| 4063232 | Fernald | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4064530 | Kaiser et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
| 4068310 | Friauf | Jan 1978 | A |
| 4072984 | Kaiser | Feb 1978 | A |
| 4079367 | Yonezawa et al. | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4079458 | Rider | Mar 1978 | A |
| 4095216 | Spicer | Jun 1978 | A |
| 4109276 | Hopkins, Jr. et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4110785 | Dischert et al. | Aug 1978 | A |
| 4119954 | Seitz et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4119956 | Murray | Oct 1978 | A |
| 4124870 | Schatz et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4127873 | Katagi | Nov 1978 | A |
| 4152697 | Rider et al. | May 1979 | A |
| 4198154 | Masegi et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
| 4240105 | Faroudja | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4240113 | Michael et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4241341 | Thorson | Dec 1980 | A |
| 4251871 | Yu | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4268871 | Kawamura | May 1981 | A |
| 4279002 | Rider | Jul 1981 | A |
| 4282546 | Reimeier | Aug 1981 | A |
| 4293202 | Ohnishi et al. | Oct 1981 | A |
| 4305091 | Cooper | Dec 1981 | A |
| 4314154 | Minoura et al. | Feb 1982 | A |
| 4322750 | Lord et al. | Mar 1982 | A |
| 4355337 | Sekigawa | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4356475 | Neumann et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4356555 | Ejiri et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
| 4361394 | Sakai et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4361853 | Remy et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4364090 | Wendland | Dec 1982 | A |
| 4367533 | Weiner | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4375079 | Ricketts et al. | Feb 1983 | A |
| 4386272 | Check, Jr. et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4386367 | Peterson et al. | May 1983 | A |
| 4387272 | Castro et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4389668 | Favreau | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4400719 | Powers | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4409591 | Simkovitz | Oct 1983 | A |
| 4415931 | Dischert | Nov 1983 | A |
| 4419693 | Wilkinson | Dec 1983 | A |
| 4435792 | Bechtolsheim | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4437122 | Walsh et al. | Mar 1984 | A |
| 4450483 | Coviello | May 1984 | A |
| 4460909 | Bassetti et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4464686 | Reitmeier | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4468706 | Cahill | Aug 1984 | A |
| 4481594 | Staggs et al. | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4484230 | Pugsley | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4485402 | Searby | Nov 1984 | A |
| 4506382 | Hada et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4506587 | Tanaka | Mar 1985 | A |
| 4517607 | Ohkouchi et al. | May 1985 | A |
| 4521803 | Gittinger | Jun 1985 | A |
| 4527145 | Haussmann et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4528693 | Pearson et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
| 4533951 | Powers | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4544264 | Bassetti et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4544922 | Watanabe et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
| 4560980 | Tillich | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4563056 | Tagawa et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4569081 | Mintzer et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4573070 | Cooper | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4578689 | Spencer et al. | Mar 1986 | A |
| 4589012 | Songer | May 1986 | A |
| 4605966 | Collins | Aug 1986 | A |
| 4613877 | Spencer et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
| 4616219 | Tanaka et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4620217 | Songer | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4623922 | Wischermann | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4625219 | Horiuchi | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4625222 | Bassetti et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
| 4626838 | Tsujioka et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4630309 | Karow | Dec 1986 | A |
| 4636857 | Achiba | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4639766 | Schine | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4642622 | Ito et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4646076 | Wiedenman et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4646355 | Petrick et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
| 4648045 | Demetrescu | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4648119 | Wingfield et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4651169 | Muka | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4651207 | Bergmann et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
| 4656514 | Wilkinson et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4661850 | Strolle et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4672369 | Preiss et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4673978 | Dischert et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4675735 | Wilkinson et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4677493 | Shimya | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4679039 | Neil et al. | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4679086 | May | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4684937 | Schine | Aug 1987 | A |
| 4697177 | Schine | Sep 1987 | A |
| 4698664 | Nichols et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4698675 | Casey | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4698843 | Burt et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4703318 | Haggerty | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4703363 | Kitamura | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4703513 | Gennery | Oct 1987 | A |
| 4704605 | Edelson | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4707715 | Miura | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4173672 | Horibata et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4710799 | Songer | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4715006 | Nagata | Dec 1987 | A |
| 4719509 | Sakamoto | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4720705 | Gupta et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4720745 | DeForest et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4723163 | Skinner | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4723166 | Stratton | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4725892 | Suzuki et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4725966 | Darby et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4725967 | Aiba | Feb 1988 | A |
| 4731648 | Bernard et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4734715 | Shiraishi | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4737858 | DeBaryshe | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4740842 | Annegarn | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4742363 | Shiraishi | May 1988 | A |
| 4758965 | Liang et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4761819 | Denison | Aug 1988 | A |
| 4780711 | Doumas | Oct 1988 | A |
| 4783840 | Song | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4786923 | Shimizu | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4786963 | McNeely | Nov 1988 | A |
| 4791582 | Ueda et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4791679 | Barski | Dec 1988 | A |
| 4799173 | Rose et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
| 4805117 | Fiore et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4805226 | Guebey | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4808984 | Trueblood et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4809021 | Check et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4811245 | Bunker et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4812783 | Honjo et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4816905 | Tweedy et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4817175 | Tenenbaum et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
| 4829587 | Glazer et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4833723 | Loveridge | May 1989 | A |
| 4839726 | Balopole et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4843380 | Oakley et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
| 4847641 | Tung | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4851909 | Noske et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
| 4853970 | Ott | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4860119 | Maniwa | Aug 1989 | A |
| 4870599 | Hempel et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4870611 | Martin et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
| 4894721 | Matsuda | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4894729 | Murayama | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4897805 | Wang | Jan 1990 | A |
| 4905166 | Schuerman | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4908866 | Goldwasser et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
| 4914459 | Mama et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4918626 | Watkins et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4920491 | Eberhard et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
| 4926248 | Kobayashi et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4933689 | Yoknis | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4941045 | Birch | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4941186 | Massmann et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4952921 | Mosier | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4965678 | Yamada | Oct 1990 | A |
| 4985764 | Sato | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4989090 | Campbell | Jan 1991 | A |
| 4992804 | Roe | Feb 1991 | A |
| 4992874 | Willis et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5001563 | Doyle | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5005139 | Tung | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5019903 | Dougall | May 1991 | A |
| 5023919 | Wataya | Jun 1991 | A |
| 5029108 | Lung | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5032899 | Sato | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5047955 | Shope | Sep 1991 | A |
| 5068914 | Klees | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5072291 | Sekizawa | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5087973 | Kawahara | Feb 1992 | A |
| 5097517 | Holt | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5099319 | Esch et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5101274 | Yoshimura et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5132993 | Nishiura et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5133079 | Ballantyne et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5146333 | Chaplin | Sep 1992 | A |
| 5182633 | Antonio et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5229868 | Kanno et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5241428 | Goldwasser et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5287420 | Barrett | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5294984 | Mori et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5303326 | Dean et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5353121 | Young et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5365604 | Kwok | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5387943 | Silver | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5392075 | Gai | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5406626 | Ryan | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5408329 | Mailloux | Apr 1995 | A |
| 5424780 | Cooper | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5430485 | Lankford et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5442407 | Iu | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5442636 | Bontekoe | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5504815 | Ryan et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5523796 | Marshall et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5524051 | Ryan | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5544262 | Pagallo | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5544264 | Bellegarda | Aug 1996 | A |
| 5555463 | Staron | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5563963 | Kaplan | Oct 1996 | A |
| 5583937 | Ullrich et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5590195 | Ryan | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5710601 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5802240 | Asai | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5815671 | Morrison | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5838298 | Shirasaka | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5877815 | Tsujimura | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5887114 | Nakantani et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
| 5893062 | Bhadkamkar et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5940190 | Overall et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5970205 | Nakamura et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
| RE36801 | Logan et al. | Aug 2000 | E |
| 6133957 | Campbell | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6181383 | Fox et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6215526 | Barton et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6233389 | Barton et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
| 6310886 | Barton | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6324337 | Goldwasser | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6324338 | Wood et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6327418 | Barton | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0 192 292 (1B) | Aug 1986 | EP |
| 0 192 292 | Aug 1986 | EP |
| 0192 292 | Aug 1986 | EP |
| 0192292 | Aug 1986 | EP |
| 2269270 | Nov 1975 | FR |
| 2 120 899(7) | Dec 1983 | GB |
| 2197152 | May 1988 | GB |
| 53-106526 | Sep 1978 | JP |
| 56-140461 | Nov 1981 | JP |
| 58-75192 | May 1983 | JP |
| 58-160986 | Sep 1983 | JP |
| 58-162984 | Sep 1983 | JP |
| 59210774 | Nov 1984 | JP |
| 60-202474 | Oct 1985 | JP |
| 60-204177 | Oct 1985 | JP |
| 60-206318 | Oct 1985 | JP |
| 61-75682 | Apr 1986 | JP |
| 61-156980 | Jul 1986 | JP |
| 61-214073 | Sep 1986 | JP |
| 61-214661 | Sep 1986 | JP |
| 62-20076 | Jan 1987 | JP |
| 6218867 | Jan 1987 | JP |
| 62-140182 | Jun 1987 | JP |
| 62-43989 | Sep 1987 | JP |
| 62-232087 | Oct 1987 | JP |
| 62-274472 | Nov 1987 | JP |
| 62-279477 | Dec 1987 | JP |
| 62-296280 | Dec 1987 | JP |
| 63-18877 | Jan 1988 | JP |
| 63-24369 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| 63-38381 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| 63-48088 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| 63038381 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| 63048088 | Feb 1988 | JP |
| 63-73479 | Apr 1988 | JP |
| 63-82077 | Apr 1988 | JP |
| 63-138876 | Jun 1988 | JP |
| 63-213084 | Sep 1988 | JP |
| 63-245174 | Oct 1988 | JP |
| 63-307954 | Dec 1988 | JP |
| 01-84385 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| 64-77384 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| 1084385 | Mar 1989 | JP |
| 1-125070 | May 1989 | JP |
| 2-131689 | May 1990 | JP |
| 2-177683 | Jul 1990 | JP |
| 6-133280 | May 1994 | JP |
| 6-153169 | May 1994 | JP |
| WO 9222060 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| WO9222060 | Dec 1992 | WO |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20040197026 A1 | Oct 2004 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 09573284 | May 2000 | US |
| Child | 10793882 | US | |
| Parent | 07355461 | May 1989 | US |
| Child | 08119610 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 08119610 | Sep 1993 | US |
| Child | 09573284 | US |
