Digital microfluidic (DMF) devices use independent electrodes to propel, split, and join droplets in a confined environment, thereby providing a “lab-on-a-chip.” Digital microfluidic devices are alternatively referred to as electrowetting on dielectric, or “EWoD,” to further differentiate the method from competing microfluidic systems that rely on electrophoretic flow and/or micropumps.
Typically, EWoD devices include a stack of a conductor, an insulator dielectric layer, and a hydrophobic layer. A droplet is placed on the hydrophobic layer, and the stack, once actuated, can cause the droplet to deform and wet or de-wet from the surface depending on the applied voltage. Most of the literature reports on EWoD involve so-called “passive matrix” devices (a.k.a. “segmented” devices), whereby ten to twenty electrodes are directly driven with a controller. While segmented devices are easy to fabricate, the number of electrodes is limited by space and driving constraints. Accordingly, it is not possible to perform massive parallel assays, reactions, etc. in passive matrix devices. In comparison, “active matrix” devices (a.k.a. active matrix EWoD, a.k.a. AM-EWoD) devices can have many thousands, hundreds of thousands or even millions of addressable electrodes. The electrodes are typically switched by thin-film transistors (TFTs) and droplet motion is programmable so that AM-EWoD arrays can be used as general purpose devices that allow great freedom for controlling multiple droplets and executing simultaneous analytical processes.
The electrodes are typically switched by thin-film transistors (TFTs) and droplet motion is programmable so that AM-EWoD arrays can be used as general purpose devices that allow great freedom for controlling multiple droplets and executing simultaneous analytical processes. TFT arrays are highly desirable for this application, due to having thousands of addressable pixels, thus allowing mass parallelization of droplet procedures. In some instances, the pixel electrodes of the array may be differently sized, e.g., an area of high-density small pixel electrodes neighboring an area of low-density large pixel electrodes. Areas of differential pixel size facilitate rapid droplet dispensing from the reservoirs and subsequent droplet partitioning.
Traditionally, a single dielectric layer is used across the whole EWoD active surface, including regions that have different functions, or areas having different pixel densities. Because the maximum operating voltage of an electrode is largely dictated by the properties of its dielectric, a single dielectric layer results in a relatively uniform maximum operating voltage all over the device. However, in most analytical applications, different areas of the EWoD array have different uses, thus requiring some areas to undergo much greater electrical strain, which can cause voltage leakage and eventual breakdown of the substrate. These failure modes are especially acute in the reservoir regions, which perform repeated high-voltage processes, such as droplet partitioning, and there is no flexibility to cycle a different spatial region for these processes because the reservoirs are not movable with respect to the array.
The present application addresses the problems typically associated with providing different voltages and/or waveforms to different regions of digital microfluidic devices by introducing a novel architecture with a spatially variable dielectric that is well suited to enabling different electrodes to operate at different potentials and frequencies. This architecture helps to preserve the functionality in high strain areas, such as adjacent the reservoirs. Accordingly, digital microfluidic devices of the invention have longer useful lifetimes than digital microfluidic devices without this architecture.
In one aspect, the present application provides a digital microfluidic device including a first plurality of electrodes of a first density that are coupled to a set of switches, a controller operatively coupled to the set of switches and configured to provide a propulsion voltage to at least a portion of the first plurality of electrodes, and a second plurality of electrodes of a second density and configured that operate at a higher voltage than the first plurality of electrodes. A first dielectric layer having a first dielectric constant and a first thickness covers the first plurality of electrodes, and a second dielectric layer having a second dielectric constant and a second thickness covers the second plurality of electrodes. In one embodiment, the density of the first electrodes is greater than the density of the second electrodes: accordingly, the first electrodes form a high-resolution zone, while the second electrodes form a low-resolution zone. In another embodiment, the dielectric constant of the first dielectric layer is greater than the dielectric constant of the second layer. In a further embodiment, the thickness of the first dielectric layer is smaller than the thickness of the second dielectric layer. The first and second dielectric layers may be contiguous or partially overlap. The device may also include a third plurality of reservoir electrodes that are configured to operate at a higher voltage than the first electrodes. In some instances, the device may include just the first and third reservoir electrodes and have no second electrodes. In one embodiment, the first electrodes are configured to operate at a potential between about 10 V and 20 V. In another, non-exclusive embodiment, the second electrodes are configured to operate at a potential between about 100 V and about 300 V. In an additional embodiment, the third electrodes are configured to operate at a potential between about 100 V and about 300 V. In example embodiments, the first dielectric layer has a thickness between about 50 nm and about 250 nm. In further, non-exclusive embodiments, the second dielectric layer has a thickness between about 500 nm to about 5 μm. The first electrodes may be configured to operate at a first frequency and the electrodes may be configured to operate at a second frequency. In one embodiment, the operating frequency of the first electrodes is smaller than the operating frequency of the second electrodes. Example types of switches include thin-film-transistors (TFT) and electro-mechanical switches.
As disclosed herein, the invention provides active matrix electrowetting on dielectric (AM-EWoD) devices that include a spatially variable dielectric structure. Accordingly, much greater voltages may be imposed in higher dielectric breakdown regions (e.g. reservoirs covered with thicker dielectric) than in the main array areas (e.g., TFT pixels). This architecture allows different driving schemes to be used within different regions of the EWoD device according to their dielectric properties. In some instances, the higher thickness robust dielectric may be removed and re-applied to the reservoir or adjacent regions. This design enables recycling these regions after they get fully fatigued, thereby extending the longevity of the device.
The use of spatially variable dielectrics across wide regions of an AM-EWoD device allows for different voltages and/or waveforms to be applied independently across the device in specialized areas. Also addressed is the issue of fatigue and breakdown by allowing higher stress regions to operate with thicker dielectrics at higher voltages while preventing catastrophic device failure. Moreover, a variable dielectric structure enables actuation strength increases in reservoir regions, which makes it easier to overcome capillary forces from fluid input systems. Because it is possible to increase the actuation strength with higher applied voltages, droplets from a reservoir have more predictable snap-off, which helps to regulate the volume of each droplet of reservoir fluid. Additionally, the higher actuation strength expands the range of materials that can be introduced from the reservoir onto the device.
In general, thicker dielectrics operating at higher voltages are more resistant to fatigue, while thinner dielectrics that are inherently more complex and fragile tend to fail more readily under electrical load. Furthermore, the minimum voltage required for actuation scales as the inverse square root of the capacitance, or proportionately to the square root of the thickness. Thus, operation at lower voltages (desirable for using high density TFT arrays) is challenging to achieve with variations in dielectric thickness alone. Likewise, using materials with increased dielectric constant requires complex deposition processes and inherent issues related to leakage due to mid-gap electronic states, structural deformities, and other factors.
The fundamental structure of an exemplary EWoD device is illustrated in the cross-sectional image of
When a voltage differential is applied between adjacent electrodes, the voltage on one electrode attracts opposite charges in the droplet at the dielectric-to-droplet interface, and the droplet moves toward this electrode, also as illustrated in
Returning to
As shown in
Equation (1) establishes the relationship between actuated contact angle θ, resting contact angle θ0, per-area capacitance C, voltage V and liquid/environment surface tension γ:
EWoD performance is highly dependent on the difference between resting and actuated contact angles (θ−θ0). The capacitance per unit area C is a function of dielectric constant E and dielectric thickness d according to Equation (2)
It can be seen that, in order to increases the extent of actuation, it is desirable to have one or more of a high dielectric constant, a low thickness, and a high voltage.
One can envision tuning the parameter space such that the EWoD device operates at 75% of the breakdown voltage VB, such that V=0.75·VB. Then, a relationship with the breakdown voltage can be seen in Equation (3), where F represents an actuation efficacy proportional to the difference in contact angles, and VB is expressed as the dielectric thickness d multiplied by the dielectric strength DS, VB=DS·d:
It can be seen that the actuation efficacy increases at higher thicknesses and voltages, assuming operating voltages close to VB and that this benefit is not exactly offset by a decrease in permittivity for the thicker dielectric.
Equation (4) reflects that the minimum voltage Vmin is directly proportional to the square root of the dielectric thickness d in view of Equation (2), α being hysteresis of wetting and de-wetting:
This shows why operating at low voltages is quite difficult due to a need for aggressively reducing dielectric thickness or increasing dielectric permittivity. The dielectric thickness required to work at comparatively lower voltage ranges (e.g., about 10 V) results in a device much more prone to fatigue and failure. It has also been found that high thickness dielectrics operating at high voltage ranges tend to be more robust and provide large actuated contact angles compared to traditional, low-voltage platforms on thin film transistors (TFT).
Example higher-stress EWoD operations include reservoir regions featuring special electrode patterns as well as designated moderate-density electrode regions for low-resolution operations. An example of a reservoir region having specialty electrodes is exemplified in
As an alternative, as shown in
Dielectric layers may be manufactured with deposition methods commonly used in the art, for example sputtering, atomic layer deposition (ALD), spin coating, chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and other vacuum deposition techniques. Creating spatial profiles featuring two or more dielectrics of different materials and thickness may be achieved through, for instance, shadow masking, photolithography, and dry or wet etching techniques. If desired, the high dielectric thickness areas may be stripped for re-use since their robustness enables them to hold up much better to repeated actuation.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that numerous changes and modifications can be made in the specific embodiments of the invention described above without departing from the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the whole of the foregoing description is to be interpreted in an illustrative and not in a limitative sense.
This application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/962,238, filed Jan. 17, 2020. All references, patents, and patent applications disclosed herein are incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3813519 | Jochin et al. | May 1974 | A |
5311337 | McCartney, Jr. | May 1994 | A |
5964995 | Nikiforov et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6352758 | Huang et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6565727 | Shenderov | May 2003 | B1 |
6773566 | Shenderov | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6911132 | Pamula et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6967489 | Brooks et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6977033 | Becker et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7052244 | Fouillet et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7053009 | Conley, Jr. et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7163612 | Sterling et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7215306 | Lo | May 2007 | B2 |
7328979 | Decre et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7420549 | Jacobson et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7458661 | Kim et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7504709 | Masuda et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7531072 | Roux et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7547380 | Velev | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7641779 | Becker et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7733559 | Kawase et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7767069 | Lee et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7902680 | Tano et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7976795 | Zhou et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8053239 | Wheeler et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8093064 | Shah et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8128798 | Adachi et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8159644 | Takatori | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8173000 | Hadwen et al. | May 2012 | B1 |
8187864 | Wheeler et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8319759 | Jacobson et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8349276 | Pamula et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8388909 | Pollack et al. | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8409417 | Wu | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8460528 | Pollack et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8514479 | Bae et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8525966 | Takatori | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8529743 | Kim et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8547111 | Hadwen et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8587513 | Ozawa | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8593438 | Komatsu et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8603413 | Fouillet | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8653832 | Hadwen et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8764958 | Wang | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8791891 | Van Dijk et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8810882 | Heikenfeld et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8815070 | Wang et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8834695 | Wang et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8858772 | Crane et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8926811 | Wu | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8936708 | Feiglin et al. | Jan 2015 | B2 |
8940147 | Bartsch et al. | Jan 2015 | B1 |
8958044 | Takatori | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8993348 | Wheeler et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8994705 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9061262 | Vann et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9216414 | Chu | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9266076 | Kim et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9458489 | Lim et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9458543 | Hadwen | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9476811 | Mudrik et al. | Oct 2016 | B2 |
9594056 | Fobel et al. | Mar 2017 | B2 |
9610582 | Kapur et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9623407 | Delamarche et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9634145 | Ellinger et al. | Apr 2017 | B2 |
9649632 | Van Dam et al. | May 2017 | B2 |
9714463 | White et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
9815056 | Wu et al. | Nov 2017 | B2 |
9915631 | Hoffmeyer et al. | Mar 2018 | B2 |
9952423 | De Greef et al. | Apr 2018 | B2 |
9983169 | Bramanti | May 2018 | B2 |
10018828 | Massard | Jul 2018 | B2 |
10133057 | Petcu et al. | Nov 2018 | B1 |
10486156 | Campbell et al. | Nov 2019 | B2 |
10543466 | Wu | Jan 2020 | B2 |
10646454 | Liu et al. | May 2020 | B2 |
10882042 | French | Jan 2021 | B2 |
20060039823 | Yamakawa et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070023292 | Kim et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080124252 | Marchand et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20100032293 | Pollack et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100225611 | Lee et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20120273702 | Culbertson et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130161193 | Jacobs et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20150377831 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20160199832 | Jamshidi et al. | Jul 2016 | A1 |
20160312165 | Lowe, Jr. et al. | Oct 2016 | A1 |
20170315090 | Wheeler et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20180246058 | Bramanti | Aug 2018 | A1 |
20190210026 | Jebrail et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20200064705 | Kayal et al. | Feb 2020 | A1 |
20200089035 | Tsai et al. | Mar 2020 | A1 |
20200114135 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Apr 2020 | A1 |
20200347840 | Paolini, Jr. et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
20200348576 | Visani et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2013076739 | Apr 2013 | JP |
200916823 | Apr 2009 | TW |
2007120241 | Oct 2007 | WO |
2017075295 | May 2017 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Abdelgawad, Mohamed et al., “The Digital Revolution: A New Paradigm for Microfluidics”, Advanced Materials, vol. 21, pp. 920-5,(2009). Jan. 1, 2009. |
Choi, Kihwan et al., “Digital Microfluidics”, Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 5:413-40 (2012). Apr. 9, 2012. |
Qi, Lin et al., “Mechanical-activated digital microfluidics with gradient surface wettability”, Lab Chip, vol. 19, pp. 223-232, (2019). Dec. 4, 2019. |
Subramanian, R. Shankar et al., “Motion of a Drop on a Solid Surface Due to a Wettability Gradient”, Lanqmuir, vol. 12, p. 11844-9, (2005). Nov. 4, 2005. |
Yu, Xi et al., “Surface Gradient Material: From Superhydrophobicity to Superhydrophilicity”, Langmuir, vol. 22, pp. 4483-6, (2006). Apr. 7, 2006. |
Ito, Yoshihiro et al., “The Movement of a Water Droplet on a Gradient Surface Prepared by Photodegradation”, Langmuir, vol. 23, pp. 1845-1850, (2007). Dec. 22, 2006. |
Bhattacharjee, Biddut, “Study of Droplet Splitting in an Electrowetting Based Digital Microfluidic System”, The University of British Columbia, Sep. 2012. Sep. 1, 2012. |
Cho, Sung Kwon et al., “Creating, Transporting, Cutting, and Merging Liquid Droplets by Electrowetting-Based Actuation for Digital Microfluidic Circuits”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 12, No. 1, Feb. 2003. Feb. 1, 2003. |
Nikapitiya, N. Y. Jagath B.et al., “Accurate, consistent, and fast droplet splitting and dispensing in electrowetting on dielectric digital microfluidics”, Mirco and Nano Systems Letters, vol. 5, No. 24, Jun. 2017. Jun. 16, 2017. |
Hadwen, B. et al., “Programmable large area digital microfluidic array with integrated droplet sensing for bioassays”, Lab on a Chip, Issue 18, (2012). May 22, 2012. |
Cooney, Christopher G. et al., “Electrowetting droplet microfluidics on a single planar surface”, Microfluisics and Nanofluidics, vol. 2, Issue 5, pp. 435-446 (Sep. 2006). Sep. 1, 2006. |
Fouillet, Y. et al., “EWOD Digital Microfluidics for Lab on a Chip”, International Conference on Nanochannels, Microchannels, and Minichannels, Paper No. ICNMM2006-96020, pp. 1255-1264, (Sep. 2008). Sep. 15, 2008. |
Nemani, Srinivasa Kartik et al., “Surface Modification of Polymers: Methods and Applications”, Advanced Materials Interfaces, vol. 5, Issue 24, p. 1801247, Dec. 21, 2018. Dec. 21, 2018. |
Hitzbleck, Martina et al., “Reagents in microfluidics: an ‘in’ and ‘out’ challenge”, Chem. Soc. Rev., vol. 42, p. 8494, (2013). Mar. 27, 2013. |
Walker, Shawn W. et al., “Modeling the Fluid Dynamics of Electro-Wetting On Dielectric (EWOD)”, Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 986-1000, (Aug. 2006). Aug. 2006. |
Li, Yiyan et al., “Improving the performance of electrowetting on dielectric microfluidics using piezoelectric top plate control”, Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 229, pp. 63-74 (2016). 2016. |
Barbulovic-Nad, Irena et al., “Digital microfluidics for cell-based assays”, Lab Chip, vol. 8, pp. 519-526 (2008). Feb. 25, 2008. |
Newman, Sharon et al., “High density DNA storage library via dehydration with digital microfluidic retrieval”, Nature Communications, vol. 10, No. 1706 (2019). Apr. 12, 2019. |
Dhindsa, Manjeet et al., “Virtual electrowetting channels: electronic liquid transport with continuous channel functionality”, Lab on a Chip, Issue 7, pp. 832-836, (2010). Feb. 26, 2010. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability for Application No. PCT/US2021/013659, dated Jul. 28, 2022, 6 pages. |
Korean Intellectual Property Office, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, PCT/US2021/013659, dated May 12, 2021. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210220830 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62962238 | Jan 2020 | US |