This patent document relates to surgical laser systems. More precisely, this patent document relates to homogenizing a laser beam by a spatio-temporal beam modulator in ophthalmic surgical laser systems.
Surgery with femtosecond ophthalmic lasers is based on generating a pulsed laser beam and delivering the laser pulses by a scanning delivery system through a focusing optics to a sequence of focus spots along a scan-pattern in a target region of an ophthalmic tissue. Each laser pulse can create a plasma or cavitation bubble in the target tissue at the focus spot of the laser beam when the beam intensity or energy density exceeds a plasma or photodisruption threshold. During surgery, the focus spot of the laser beam is scanned along a three dimensional scan-pattern, creating a sequence of these bubbles to form macroscopic surgical cuts or photodisrupted regions.
During the surgery, however, the laser beam can also cause unintended collateral damage away from the focus spot such as excessive heating and shockwaves in the target tissue and light poisoning in the retina. Therefore, surgical systems are designed to deliver the laser beam with an energy density that exceeds the photodisruption threshold, but only marginally to achieve the surgical functionality while minimizing the collateral damage.
The energy density or beam intensity is determined by the energy, duration and repetition rate of the individual laser pulses and the size of the focus spot. Modern surgical laser systems provide high precision and control by using precisely controlled laser sources, refined optical designs, high quality optical parts and an objective with a large numerical aperture to focus the laser beam down to a diffraction limited focus spot with a diameter of a few microns, and do so at all points of the scan-pattern within a surgical volume, or at all scanner positions of the surgical laser system. This high precision makes the modern laser surgical systems capable of maintaining the beam intensity marginally above the plasma threshold along the entire scan-pattern within the surgical volume in ideal or model targets.
Unfortunately, in spite of all the design and manufacturing effort spent on optimizing the laser sources and optics, the focus spot in the ophthalmic target region is often still larger than its diffraction limited value because the target tissue itself often gets distorted, making it different from the ideal or model targets used during the design of the laser optics. Distortions can be also caused by imperfections of the scanning delivery system and the focusing optics. The enlarging of the focus spot caused by any of these distortions can lead to failing surgical performance since it lowers the pulse energy density or beam intensity below the plasma threshold and thus prevents the scanning laser beam from forming the planned surgical cuts, leaving uncut lines or regions in the target region.
This problem of failing surgical performance can become particularly acute during surgical cuts where the targeted tissue is very thin such as a capsulotomy of the thin lens capsular bag during a cataract surgery. Since the targeted tissue is thin, the laser beam scans it only once or only a few times along a loop, as this scan-pattern should be already capable of cutting through the entire thickness of the capsular bag. However, if any one of the above distortions reduces the beam intensity below the plasma threshold along a section of the loop then that section can remain uncut. This uncut section of the capsular bag needs to be cut and separated manually, possibly leading to a tearing of the capsular bag and thus to a substantial lowering of the precision of the cataract surgery. Therefore, there is a need for surgical laser systems that can deliver the laser beam with a pulse energy density that is marginally higher than the plasma threshold in the entire surgical volume even if distortions are present along the beam path either in the target region or in the optical system itself, as such laser systems are capable of cutting the target region according to the scan-pattern in the entire surgical volume without leaving uncut regions or lines.
An objective of cataract surgery is to direct or deliver a surgical laser beam 10 into an eye 1 through its cornea 2 and anterior chamber 3 to photodisrupt a cataractous target region in a lens 5.
It is known from the theory of optical wave propagation that the intensity of light I(P) at a point P in the focal plane that contains the geometrical focus point P0 is given by the absolute value squared of the electromagnetic disturbance, in essence the electric field, with the fast oscillating eiωt factor removed:
I(P)=|u(P)|2.
According to the Huygens-Fresnel principle, the electric field U(P) at the point P is given by an integral of the beam components E(Q,P) over the Gaussian reference sphere segment S:
Here, E(Q,P) is the propagating electric field, or beam component that propagates from a dS(Q) vicinity of point Q on the Gaussian reference sphere segment S to the point P of the focal plane near P0, the geometrical focus point. This beam component can be decomposed into E0(Q,P), the propagating electric field in the absence of a phase aberration and into eikΦ, representing the phase aberration by a phase aberration function Φ. The undistorted field can be represented as:
Here, A is the amplitude of the beam component at point Q, reduced during the propagation to point P by 1/s, where s is the length of the QP ray from the point Q to point P. Further, eik(s-R) represents the propagating wave phase factor, acquired by the propagating electromagnetic wave E0(Q,P) in the absence of aberrations. Finally, k=2π/λ is the wavenumber and λ is the wavelength of the laser beam 10. Discussing the aberration-free beam, for P=P0 s=R and thus the phase factors of the beam components that propagate from the different Q points of the reference sphere segment S to the geometrical focus point P0 add up with maximum constructive interference. Further, as known, the interference remains constructive in a small but finite vicinity of the geometrical focus point P0, broadening the geometrical focus point P0 into a diffraction limited focus spot 32.
As mentioned above, the laser systems are often designed so that the beam intensity exceeds the plasma threshold only marginally. Therefore, in the above three cases the beam intensity profile may remain above the plasma threshold only at the peaks of the 1st and 3rd beam components, whereas it may dip below the plasma threshold for the 2nd beam component, smeared out by the wrinkle center 41. Correspondingly, in the left focus spot position the laser beam 10 may create a cut shifted to the left from the center of the focus spot 32; in the central focus spot position the laser beam 10 may create two cuts, shifted to the left and to the right from the center, and finally in the right focus spot position the laser beam 10 may create a cut shifted to the right from the center of the focus spot 32. Further, as mentioned before, these cuts can be only partial cuts, limited to portions of the beam cross section.
The surgeon may attempt to cut these no-cut regions by re-scanning the entire scan pattern or portions of the scan-pattern 50. However, this is not very effective, since the same wrinkles are still present in the cornea, giving rise to the same aberrations. Thus, the same regions will remain uncut during the second scan. Re-scanning is also time-consuming. Every time the surgeon is forced to repeat a surgical step, valuable surgical time is spent, increasing the probability of undesirable outcomes.
Therefore, the surgeon may be forced to cut the uncut regions manually to complete the surgery, possibly creating jagged edges, leading to the formation of tears in the ophthalmic tissue. These undesirable effects call out for improvements in the surgical laser systems that reduce or eliminate the formation of the uncut regions.
Briefly and generally, embodiments of the invention offer solutions to the above problems by providing a surgical laser system that includes a laser engine, configured to generate a laser beam of laser pulses; a scanning delivery system, configured to direct the laser beam to a target region, and to scan the laser beam along a scan-pattern in the target region; and a spatio-temporal modulator, configured to perform a space- and time dependent modulation of the laser beam.
Other embodiments include a method of homogenizing a laser beam, including: generating a laser beam of laser pulses with a laser engine; directing the laser beam to a target region with a scanning delivery system; scanning the laser beam along a scan-pattern in the target region with the scanning delivery system; and performing a space- and time dependent modulation of the laser beam with a spatio-temporal modulator.
To address the above described problem of the appearance of extensive no-cut regions caused by the corneal wrinkles distorting the laser beam, this patent document describes embodiments of a surgical laser system that includes a spatio-temporal beam modulator.
The laser system 100 can also include a guidance system 130 to provide guidance information for the ophthalmic surgeon. In some embodiments, the guidance system 130 can include a video microscope 132 to display a video image of the eye 1. In others, the guidance system 130 can also include an in-depth display to display the in-depth image created by the in-depth imaging system 120. In yet others, the guidance system 130 can display both the video image and the in-depth image.
In some embodiments, the guidance system 130 can include a guidance display to guide the surgeon based on the result of the processing of the in-depth image of the imaging system 120 by the image processor 122. In others, the guidance system 130 can display the results of a processing of the video image of the video microscope 132 by a video image processor. For example, the guidance display of the guidance system 130 can include a target pattern or a crosshair pattern overlaid on the video image of the eye 1 to indicate a position of an optical center or axis of the laser system 100, thus allowing the surgeon to determine the position of the eye 1 relative to the optical axis. In other embodiments, the guidance system 130 can display a reference of the laser system 100 overlaid on the in-depth image, generated by the in-depth imaging system 120. These guidance displays can be used by the surgeon to dock the laser system 100 onto the eye with high precision and to plan and control the ophthalmic surgical procedure. The operations of the laser system 100 can be controlled and coordinated by a system controller 140.
The pulsed laser beam 10, generated by the laser engine 110 can be coupled into a scanning delivery system 200 at a beam splitter BS1. The laser engine 110 can be capable of generating the pulsed laser beam 10 with a pulse length in the femtosecond range (1-1,000 fs) or in the picosecond range (1-1,000 ps). The scanning delivery system 200 can redirect and deliver the pulsed laser beam 10 into the eye 1 of a patient 12 through an objective 240. The objective 240 can be movable by a gantry 245. The patient interface PI 20 can be attachable to the objective 240 to immobilize the targeted eye 1 relative to the objective 240 and to provide a controlled entry for the laser beam 10 into the eye 1.
Finally, the scanning delivery system 200 can include a spatio-temporal modulator 300, or space-time modulator 300, configured to perform a space- and time dependent modulation of the laser beam 10. The spatio-temporal modulator 300 can create a modulated component Φmod for the aberration function Φ in the Huygens-Fresnel integral that is additive to Φaberration, the aberration caused by the wrinkled tissue and possibly the surgical laser system: Φ=Φaberration+Φmod.
Before proceeding with the detailed description, it is pointed out here that some existing systems attempt to reduce the effects of beam distortion by performing a diagnostics of the beam to determine the beam distortion by using e.g. a wavefront analyzer and then modifying the beam based on a feedback, generated from the determined beam distortion. These feedback systems increase the complexity of the system considerably, also increasing the number of elements that can (i) break down and require servicing, (ii) slow down the system's response time and operating speed, and that (iii) can increase the cost of the system.
In contrast, some embodiments of the spatio-temporal modulator 300 are operable without a beam diagnostic system or a wavefront analyzer, and do not need to include a feedback system either.
Instead of utilizing such diagnostic and feedback systems, in some embodiments the spatio-temporal modulator 300 can be configured to randomize the phase or the amplitude of the beam components of the laser beam on a modulation length scale and a modulation time scale. Such a randomization of the phases or amplitudes can be a comparably effective way to reduce the beam distortions caused by corneal wrinkling, while it does not add to the complexity of the laser system 100 and so it does not slow down its performance, require additional servicing, or increase the overall costs.
Should the ST modulator 300 remain fixed in its configuration of time t while the scanning of the focus spot continues, the focus spot will continue to scan through a region where the intensity of the laser beam is reduced by the corneal wrinkles below the plasma threshold over an extended no-cut region.
In particular, even if the beam components exhibit a destructive interference at a time t at a position x, forcing the beam intensity below the plasma threshold and thus the focus spot 32 into a no-cut region, the STM 300 can cause the beam components to change their destructively interfering phase factors in a short modulation time Δt, thus shifting, modifying or eliminating the no-cut region at the location x+Δx by the time t+Δt the laser beam 10 is scanned through the location x+Δx along the scan line. Thus, the operation of the ST modulator 300 can make the scanned laser beam 10 to exhibit an effective beam intensity where the spatial extent of the “fixed STM” no-cut regions is reduced to much shorter effective no-cut regions. Therefore, the spatio-temporal modulation of the beam components by the ST modulator 300 can cause the laser beam 10 to maintain its beam intensity above the plasma threshold over a much higher fraction of the scan-pattern and to photodisrupt the target tissue successfully throughout the scan-pattern, interrupted only by much-shortened no-cut regions.
In some embodiments, the ST modulator 300 can be configured to reduce a length of a no-cut region, or equivalently an un-photo-disrupted scan-segment by a factor of more than 2 compared to the length of an un-photo-disrupted scan-segment made by the same surgical laser system 100 at the same location with the same corneal wrinkling but without the ST modulator 300.
However, in existing laser systems a corneal wrinkle 7 can reduce the intensity of the surgical laser beam 10 below the plasma threshold over a substantial no-cut region, forming an undisrupted tag 64. This undisrupted tag 64 requires the surgeon to manually complete the capsulotomy 60, possibly tearing the capsular bag or creating a jagged capsulotomy when removing the circular lid 62. Either of these possibilities can substantially reduce the precision of the cataract procedure itself and the subsequent insertion of an Intra Ocular Lens, or IOL, into the capsular bag.
In such embodiments the ST modulator 300 can shift or modify a potential no-cut region substantially while the focus spot 32 is scanned from the 1st spot to the 2nd nearby spot. Therefore, such an embodiment can reduce a potentially extended no-cut region to one or two un-photo-disrupted spots, drastically improving the precision of the surgical procedure, performed by the laser system 100.
In such embodiments, even if the beam intensity at the 1st point is below the plasma threshold, by the time the scanning of the laser beam reaches the 2nd point, the ST modulator 300 changed the beam modulation to such a degree that the effective beam intensity is likely to be restored to its above-the-plasma-threshold level. Therefore, such embodiments can reduce the transverse spatial extent of potential no-cut regions to that of the transverse line separation. As
In sum, the list of the advantages of using the spatio-temporal modulator 300 in the laser system 100 includes the followings. (i) When corneal wrinkles cause the appearance of uncut regions, a normal response with a typical laser system is to increase the energy of the laser beam so that no uncut region is left behind. However, such an increase of the beam energy can cause collateral damage in the form of overheating and shockwaves in the ophthalmic tissue. In laser systems that include the STM 300, even in the presence of corneal wrinkling the surgical goals such as a clean capsulotomy can still be achieved without increasing the beam energy. This is so because, while the corneal wrinkles can still distort the laser beam to leave uncut regions, the inclusion of the STM 300 substantially reduces the spatial extent of these uncut regions, and these short uncut regions can be comfortably cut manually by the surgeon later without causing jagged edges or tearing. Thus, laser systems with the STM 300 eliminate the need to increase the pulse energy of the laser beam in the presence of corneal wrinkling. This aspect also allows laser systems with the STM 300 to reduce the overall exposure time of the targeted ophthalmic tissues.
(ii) Referring back to
(iii) Finally, incorporating the ST modulator 300 into the laser system 100 can also make re-tracing a surgical cut or portions of it much more effective. In an example, after performing a surgical beam scan the surgeon may observe that the scan still left an undesirably long uncut section, and may decide to rescan the uncut section. In a laser system without the STM 300, the rescanning does not promise an improvement, as the corneal wrinkles will once again cause a destructive interference between the beam components, thus preventing the cut even during the rescan. In contrast, in a laser system that includes the STM 300, by the time the uncut section is rescanned, the STM 300 changes the beam modulation and thus substantially reduces or eliminates the destructive interference for the rescan of the uncut section. In other words, since the phases of the beam components are modulated differently during the first scan and the rescan, the interferences, which were destructive during the first scan and gave rise to uncut portions, change substantially during the rescan, so that the uncut regions of the first scan get filled in by the subsequent rescan. Rescanning can include scanning along the same scanning track or scanning in the vicinity of the previous cut, preferably within the plasma-tissue interaction length. When cutting with a femtosecond laser, this plasma-tissue interaction length is typically the diameter of the laser-induced cavitation bubbles in the tissue, often in the 1-20 micrometer range. In an example, a capsulotomy can include performing repeated circular cuts at a sequence of z depths moving in a posterior-to-anterior direction, the circular cuts being separated by a few micrometers and thus creating a macroscopic cut shaped like a cylinder. Re-scanning can be performed as an intervention by the surgeon, as an intervention by the control system, or be pre-programmed into the control system software without feedback.
After having described the operation and impact of the spatio-temporal modulator 300, its various embodiments are described next.
From the XY scanner 220, the laser beam 10 can propagate to a second Z scanner-expander 230 whose functions can be similar to that of the first Z scanner-expander 210. Various embodiments of the scanning delivery system 200 may include only one of the two Z scanner-expanders 210 and 230. The functions of the Z scanner-expanders 210 and 230 can include scanning the z longitudinal or depth coordinate of the focus spot 32 in the target region or tissue. The scanning delivery system 200 can also include the objective 240, to which the laser beam may be redirected by a beam splitter BS3. The objective 240 can focus the expanded laser beam into a high numerical aperture (high NA) focused beam and deliver it to the target region through the patient interface (PI) 20. Generating a high NA beam can ensure that the laser beam 10 causes photodisruption only at the intended z depth or longitudinal coordinate, thus avoiding collateral damage posterior or anterior relative to the target region. In some embodiments, NA can be in the 0.15-0.45 range. In some others, it can be in the 0.25-0.35 range.
In various embodiments, the spatio-temporal modulator 300 can be a transmissive modulator, an absorptive modulator or a reflective modulator, inserted into the beam path accordingly.
Finally,
While
It is noted here that optical elements with a linearly varying surface may not be useful as STM 300s, as they can redirect the laser beam 10 without randomizing their phases with a spatio-temporal modulation. Therefore, embodiments of the ST modulator 300 may include optical elements that are configured to perform a time-dependent phase modulation that is a non-linear function of a coordinate across a beam aperture of the laser beam 10.
While the embodiments of
During the performing 440 the space- and time dependent modulation can be performed within a modulation time Δt less than 10 times a pulse repetition time of the laser pulses.
During the performing 440 the space- and time dependent modulation can be performed within a return time of the scan-pattern, wherein the scan-pattern includes a set of closely spaced lines, and the return time is a time the scanning of the laser beam takes between passing a first point on a first line of the scan-pattern and a second point on a second line of the scan-pattern nearest to the first point.
During the performing 440, the space- and time dependent modulation can be performed within a return time of the scan-pattern, wherein the scan-pattern includes a set of closely spaced scan segments, and the return time is a time the scan of the laser beam takes between passing a first point on a first scan segment and a second point on a second scan segment nearest to the first point.
The performing 440 can include performing a space- and time dependent phase modulation of the laser beam. In other embodiments, the performing 440 can include performing a space- and time dependent amplitude modulation of the laser beam.
While this document contains many specifics, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of an invention or of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features specific to particular embodiments of the invention. Certain features that are described in this document in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented in combination in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments separately or in any suitable subcombination. Moreover, although features may be described above as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can in some cases be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a subcombination or a variation of a subcombination.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4538608 | L'Esperance, Jr. | Sep 1985 | A |
4635299 | MacGovern | Jan 1987 | A |
5541951 | Juhasz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5548234 | Turi et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5549632 | Lai | Aug 1996 | A |
5561678 | Juhasz et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5656186 | Mourou et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5789734 | Torigoe et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
6011640 | Hutton | Jan 2000 | A |
6081543 | Liu et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6099522 | Knopp et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6203539 | Shimmick et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6220707 | Bille | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6324191 | Horvath | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6610050 | Bille | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6610051 | Bille | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6693927 | Horvath et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6726680 | Knopp et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6746121 | Ross et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6751033 | Goldstein et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6908196 | Herekar et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6992765 | Horvath et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7027233 | Goldstein et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7131968 | Bendett et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7145661 | Hitzenberger | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7330275 | Raksi | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7336366 | Choma | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7390089 | Loesel et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7452080 | Wiltberger et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7452081 | Wiltberger et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7522642 | Zadoyan et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7584756 | Zadoyan et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7597444 | Rathjen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7599591 | Andersen et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7655002 | Myers | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7918559 | Tesar | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8246609 | Zickler et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8262646 | Frey et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
20030053219 | Manzi | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20040059321 | Knopp et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059398 | Yee et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040202351 | Park et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040243112 | Bendett et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254568 | Rathjen | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050228366 | Kessler et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060084954 | Zadoyan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060100613 | McArdle et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060195076 | Blumenkranz et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070073279 | Rowe et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070106285 | Raksi | May 2007 | A1 |
20070121069 | Andersen et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070126985 | Wiltberger et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129709 | Andersen et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070129775 | Mordaunt et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070173791 | Raksi | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173795 | Frey et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070173796 | Kessler et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185475 | Frey et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070219541 | Kurtz | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070235543 | Zadoyan et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070282313 | Huang et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080015553 | Zacharias | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080033406 | Andersen et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080077121 | Rathjen | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080147052 | Bendett et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080167642 | Palanker et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080192783 | Rathjen et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080228176 | Triebel et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080231807 | Lacombe et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080269731 | Swinger et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080281303 | Culbertson et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080319428 | Wiechmann et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080319464 | Bischoff et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090002835 | Prior et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090012507 | Culbertson et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090118718 | Raksi et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090131921 | Kurtz et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090149841 | Kurtz | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090171327 | Kurtz et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090231704 | Chen | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090296083 | Saaski et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090299347 | Vogler et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004641 | Frey et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100042079 | Frey et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100082017 | Zickler et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100130966 | Brownell | May 2010 | A1 |
20100191226 | Blumenkranz et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100305553 | Kittelmann et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110028958 | Raksi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110034911 | Bischoff et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110184392 | Culbertson et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110205492 | Rathjen | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110264081 | Reich et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120136342 | Bischoff et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10307741 | Sep 2004 | DE |
10 2005 013949 | Sep 2006 | DE |
0326760 | Aug 1989 | EP |
1279386 | Jan 2003 | EP |
1584310 | Oct 2005 | EP |
1837696 | Sep 2007 | EP |
2007-159740 | Jun 2007 | JP |
9856298 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2007021022 | Feb 2007 | WO |
2007056486 | May 2007 | WO |
2008055506 | May 2008 | WO |
2009089504 | Jul 2009 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Duma et al., “Determination of Significant Parameters for Eye Injury Risk from Projectiles”, Oct. 2005; Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, 59(4):960-4, 5 pages. |
Gwon et al., “Focal laser photophacoablation of normal and cataractous lenses in rabbits: Preliminary report,” May 1995, J. Cataract Refract Surg, 21:282-286, 5 pages. |
Jenkins, Francis A., White, Harvey E., Fundamentals of Optics, 4th Ed., 2001, p. 190-191. |
Kruger et al., “Experimental Increase in Accommodative Potential after Neodymium: Yttrium—Aluminum-Garnet Laser,” Jun. 2001, Ophthalmology 108:2122-2129, 8 pages. |
Lindstrom, Cionni, Donnenfeld, and Slade, “The Dawn of Laser Refractive Cataract Surgery” excerpts from Supplement to Cataract & Refractive Surgery Today, Jun. 2011, 6 pages, Sponsored by Alcon Laboratories, Inc., published in the U.S. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042777, in International Search Report mailed Mar. 25, 2011, 10 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042786, in International Search Report mailed Apr. 25, 2011, 9 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042787, in International Search Report mailed Mar. 25, 2011, 11 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042791, in International Search Report mailed Mar. 25, 2011, 14 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042796, in International Search Report mailed Mar. 28, 2011, 11 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042800, in International Search Report mailed Mar. 30, 2011, 9 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042804, in International Search Report mailed Mar. 30, 2011, 8 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042957, in International Search Report mailed Apr. 25, 2011, 9 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042960, in International Search Report mailed Apr. 25, 2011, 9 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/042964, in International Search Report mailed Apr. 25, 2011, 9 pages. |
PCT International Application No. PCT/US2010/055968, in International Search Report mailed Jul. 6, 2011, 9 pages. |
Ryan et al., “Nd:YAG Laser Photodisruption of the Lens Nucleus Before Phacoemulsification,” Oct. 1987, American Journal of Ophthalmology 104:382-386, 5 pages. |
Wang, Haifeng and Gan, Fuxi, 2001, “High focal depth with a pure-phase apodizer”, Applied Optics, vol. 40, No. 31, 5658-5662, 5 pages. |
PCT International Search Report for corresponding International Application No. PCT/US2013/029896, with mailing date Jun. 19, 2013, 3 pages. |
An, Lin and Wang, Ruikang K., “Use of a scanner to modulate spatial interferograms for in vivo full-range Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography”, Dec. 1, 2007, OPTICS LETTERS, vol. 32(23); pp. 3423-3425. |
Birngruber et al., “In-Vivo Imaging of the Development of Linear and Non-Linear Retinal Laser Effects Using Optical Coherence Tomography in Correlation with Histopathological Findings,” 1995, Proc. SPIE 2391:21-27, 7 pages. |
European Supplementary European Search Report for EP Application No. 10806836.2 with mailing date Oct. 8, 2012, 4 pages. |
Plamann K et al., “Laser parameters, focusing optics, and side effects in femtosecond laser corneal surgery”, Proc. of SPIE, vol. 6844 68440W-1-68440W-10, 2008. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130237971 A1 | Sep 2013 | US |