1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to personal audio devices such as wireless telephones that include noise cancellation, and more specifically, to a personal audio device in which damage to the output transducer is prevented while still providing adaptive noise canceling.
2. Background of the Invention
Wireless telephones, such as mobile/cellular telephones, cordless telephones, and other consumer audio devices, such as mp3 players, are in widespread use. Performance of such devices with respect to intelligibility can be improved by providing noise canceling using a microphone to measure ambient acoustic events and then using signal processing to insert an anti-noise signal into the output of the device to cancel the ambient acoustic events.
Since the acoustic environment around personal audio devices such as wireless telephones can change dramatically, depending on the sources of noise that are present and the position of the device itself, it is desirable to adapt the noise canceling to take into account such environmental changes. However, adaptive noise canceling circuits can be complex, consume additional power and can generate undesirable results under certain circumstances.
Therefore, it would be desirable to provide a personal audio device, including a wireless telephone, that provides noise cancellation in a variable acoustic environment.
The above stated objective of providing a personal audio device providing noise cancellation in a variable acoustic environment, is accomplished in a personal audio device, a method of operation, and an integrated circuit.
The personal audio device includes a housing, with a transducer mounted on the housing for reproducing an audio signal that includes both source audio for playback to a listener and an anti-noise signal for countering the effects of ambient audio sounds in an acoustic output of the transducer. A reference microphone is mounted on the housing to provide a reference microphone signal indicative of the ambient audio sounds. The personal audio device further includes an adaptive noise cancelling (ANC) processing circuit within the housing for adaptively generating the anti-noise signal from the reference microphone signal such that the anti-noise signal causes substantial cancellation of the ambient audio sounds. The ANC processing circuit monitors a level of the anti-noise signal, determines that the anti-noise signal may cause damage to the transducer and adjusts the generation of the anti-noise signal such that damage to the transducer is prevented. The integrated circuit includes a processing circuit that performs such monitoring and adjusting, and the method is a method of operation of the integrated circuit.
The foregoing and other objectives, features, and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following, more particular, description of the preferred embodiment of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings.
The present invention encompasses noise canceling techniques and circuits that can be implemented in a personal audio device, such as a wireless telephone. The personal audio device includes an adaptive noise canceling (ANC) circuit that measures the ambient acoustic environment and generates an adaptive signal that is injected in the speaker (or other transducer) output to cancel ambient acoustic events. The ANC circuit monitors a level of the anti-noise signal to determine if damage to the speaker or other transducer is imminent and adjusts the anti-noise signal if speaker damage might occur.
Referring now to
Wireless telephone 10 includes adaptive noise canceling (ANC) circuits and features that inject an anti-noise signal into speaker SPKR to improve intelligibility of the distant speech and other audio reproduced by speaker SPKR. A reference microphone R is provided for measuring the ambient acoustic environment, and is positioned away from the typical position of a user's mouth, so that the near-end speech is minimized in the signal produced by reference microphone R. A third microphone, error microphone E is provided in order to further improve the ANC operation by providing a measure of the ambient audio combined with the audio reproduced by speaker SPKR close to ear 5, when wireless telephone 10 is in close proximity to ear 5. Exemplary circuits 14 within wireless telephone 10 include an audio CODEC integrated circuit 20 that receives the signals from reference microphone R, near speech microphone NS and error microphone E and interfaces with other integrated circuits such as a radio frequency (RF) integrated circuit 12 containing the wireless telephone transceiver. In other embodiments of the invention, the circuits and techniques disclosed herein may be incorporated in a single integrated circuit that contains control circuits and other functionality for implementing the entirety of the personal audio device, such as an MP3 player-on-a-chip integrated circuit.
In general, the ANC techniques of the present invention measure ambient acoustic events (as opposed to the output of speaker SPKR and/or the near-end speech) impinging on reference microphone R, and by also measuring the same ambient acoustic events impinging on error microphone E, the ANC processing circuits of illustrated wireless telephone 10 adapt an anti-noise signal generated from the output of reference microphone R to have a characteristic that minimizes the amplitude of the ambient acoustic events at error microphone E. Since acoustic path P(z) extends from reference microphone R to error microphone E, the ANC circuits are essentially estimating acoustic path P(z) combined with removing effects of an electro-acoustic path S(z). Electro-acoustic path S(z) represents the response of the audio output circuits of CODEC IC 20 and the acoustic/electric transfer function of speaker SPKR, including the coupling between speaker SPKR and error microphone E in the particular acoustic environment, which is affected by the proximity and structure of ear 5 and other physical objects and human head structures that may be in proximity to wireless telephone 10, when wireless telephone is not firmly pressed to ear 5. While the illustrated wireless telephone 10 includes a two microphone ANC system with a third near speech microphone NS, some aspects of the present invention may be practiced in a system that does not include separate error and reference microphones, or a wireless telephone that uses near speech microphone NS to perform the function of the reference microphone R. Also, in personal audio devices designed only for audio playback, near speech microphone NS will generally not be included, and the near-speech signal paths in the circuits described in further detail below can be omitted, without changing the scope of the invention.
Referring now to
Referring now to
To implement the above, adaptive filter 34A has coefficients controlled by SE coefficient control block 33, which compares downlink audio signal ds and error microphone signal err after removal of the above-described filtered downlink audio signal ds, that has been filtered by adaptive filter 34A to represent the expected downlink audio delivered to error microphone E, and which is removed from the output of adaptive filter 34A by a combiner 36. SE coefficient control block 33 correlates the actual downlink speech signal ds with the components of downlink audio signal ds that are present in error microphone signal err. Adaptive filter 34A is thereby adapted to generate a signal from downlink audio signal ds, that when subtracted from error microphone signal err, contains the content of error microphone signal err that is not due to downlink audio signal ds. Event detection and control logic 38 perform various actions in response to various events in conformity with various embodiments of the invention, as will be disclosed in further detail below.
Since adaptive filter 32 can have a wide range of gain at different frequencies that depends on the environment to which W coefficient control 31 adapts the response of adaptive filter 32, the anti-noise signal produced by ANC circuit 30 could assume high amplitudes that could cause damage to speaker SPKR, particularly at low frequencies at which speaker SPKR has poor acoustical response. The high amplitudes can happen because W coefficient control 31 will generally attempt to cancel any low frequency ambient acoustic events by raising the gain of adaptive filter 32 in those frequency bands, irrespective of the frequency response of speaker SPKR. Further, low frequency signal components can stimulate resonances that are more damaging to speaker SPKR than higher frequency components. Therefore, a speaker damage prevention circuit 60 is included within ANC circuit 20 to process the anti-noise signal in order to prevent damage to speaker SPKR.
Referring now to
Additionally, when either or both of the first and second limiters are active, and since the adaptive filter control equations no longer apply, event detection and control block 38 acts to freeze the adaptation of W(z), i.e., W coefficient control block 31 is signaled to stop changing the values of the coefficients of adaptive filter 32 until both signal level detectors 64A and 64B indicate that limiting is no longer being applied to the anti-noise signal.
Referring now to
As in the example of
The above arrangement of baseband and oversampled signaling provides for simplified control and reduced power consumed in the adaptive control blocks, such as leaky LMS controllers 54A and 54B, while providing the tap flexibility afforded by implementing adaptive filter stages 44A-44B, 55A-55B and adaptive filter 51 at the oversampled rates. The remainder of the system of
In accordance with an embodiment of the invention, the output of combiner 46D is also combined with the output of adaptive filter stages 44A-44B that have been processed by a control chain that includes a corresponding hard mute block 45A, 45B for each of the filter stages, a combiner 46A that combines the outputs of hard mute blocks 45A, 45B, a soft mute 47 that ramps up the gain or ramps down the gain of the anti-noise channel when commencing or ending ANC operation, and then a soft limiter 48 to produce the anti-noise signal. The anti-noise signal is then subtracted by a combiner 46B from the source audio output of combiner 46D. In the present embodiment, soft limiter 48 includes speaker damage prevention circuits as described above with reference to
Event detection and control block 38 receives various inputs for event detection, such as the output of decimator 52C, which represents how well the ANC system is canceling acoustic noise as measured at error microphone E, the output of decimator 52A, which represents the ambient acoustic environment shaped by path SE(z), downlink audio signal ds, and near-end speech signal ns. Depending on detected acoustic events, or other environmental factors such as the position of wireless telephone 10 relative to ear 5, event detection and control block 38 will generate various outputs, which are not shown in
Each or some of the elements in the system of
While the invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to the preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that the foregoing and other changes in form, and details may be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
This U.S. patent application Claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/493,162 filed on Jun. 3, 2011.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5251263 | Andrea et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5337365 | Hamabe et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5425105 | Lo et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5586190 | Trantow et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5640450 | Watanabe | Jun 1997 | A |
5699437 | Finn | Dec 1997 | A |
5706344 | Finn | Jan 1998 | A |
5768124 | Stothers et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5815582 | Claybaugh et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5946391 | Dragwidge et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5991418 | Kuo | Nov 1999 | A |
6041126 | Terai et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6118878 | Jones | Sep 2000 | A |
6219427 | Kates et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6418228 | Terai et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6434246 | Kates et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6434247 | Kates et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6768795 | Feltstrom et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6850617 | Weigand | Feb 2005 | B1 |
7103188 | Jones | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7181030 | Rasmussen et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7330739 | Somayajula | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7365669 | Melanson | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7742790 | Konchitsky et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
8019050 | Mactavish et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8249262 | Chua et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8290537 | Lee et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8379884 | Horibe et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8385559 | Theverapperuma et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20010053228 | Jones | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020003887 | Zhang et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20040165736 | Hetherington et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040167777 | Hetherington et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040264706 | Ray et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050117754 | Sakawaki | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060153400 | Fujita et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20070030989 | Kates | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038441 | Inoue et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070053524 | Haulick et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070076896 | Hosaka et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070154031 | Avendano et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070258597 | Rasmussen et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070297620 | Choy | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019548 | Avendano | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080181422 | Christoph | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080226098 | Haulick et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090012783 | Klein | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090034748 | Sibbald | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090041260 | Jorgensen et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090046867 | Clemow | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090196429 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090220107 | Every et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090238369 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090245529 | Asada et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090290718 | Kahn et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090296965 | Kojima | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090304200 | Kim et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100014683 | Maeda et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100014685 | Wurm | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100061564 | Clemow et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100069114 | Lee et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100082339 | Konchitsky et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100098263 | Pan et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100124336 | Shridhar et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100166203 | Peissig et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100195838 | Bright | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100195844 | Christoph et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100272283 | Carreras et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100274564 | Bakalos et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100296666 | Lin | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100296668 | Lee et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100310086 | Magrath et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100322430 | Isberg | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110007907 | Park et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110106533 | Yu | May 2011 | A1 |
20110142247 | Fellers et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110144984 | Konchitsky | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110158419 | Theverapperuma et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110222698 | Asao et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110249826 | Van Leest | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110288860 | Schevciw et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110293103 | Park et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110299695 | Nicholson | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120140943 | Hendrix et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120207317 | Abdollahzadeh Milani et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120308024 | Alderson et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120308025 | Hendrix et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120308026 | Kamath et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120308027 | Kwatra | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120308028 | Kwatra et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120310640 | Kwatra et al. | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130272539 | Kim et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287218 | Alderson et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130287219 | Hendrix et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130301842 | Hendrix et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130301846 | Alderson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130301847 | Alderson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130301848 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130301849 | Alderson et al. | Nov 2013 | A1 |
20130343556 | Bright | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2395500 | Dec 2011 | EP |
2401744 | Nov 2004 | GB |
2455821 | Jun 2009 | GB |
2455824 | Jun 2009 | GB |
2455828 | Jun 2009 | GB |
H06-186985 | Jul 1994 | JP |
WO 2007007916 | Jan 2007 | WO |
WO 2007113487 | Nov 2007 | WO |
WO 2010117714 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO 2012134874 | Oct 2012 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Pfann, et al., “LMS Adaptive Filtering With Delta-Sigma Modulated Input Signals,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Apr. 1998, pp. 95-97, vol. 5, No. 4, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ. |
Kuo, et al., “Active Noise Control: A Tutorial Review,” Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 1999, pp. 943-973, vol. 87, No. 6, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ. |
Kates, James M., “Principles of Digital Dynamic Range Compression,” Trends in Amplification, Spring 2005, pp. 45-76, vol. 9, No. 2, Sage Publications. |
Gao, et al., “Adaptive Linearization of a Loudspeaker,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 14-17, 1991, pp. 3589-3592, Toronto, Ontario, CA. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/029,159, filed Sep. 17, 2013, Li, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/062,951, filed Oct. 25, 2013, Zhou, et al. |
Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al., “On Maximum Achievable Noise Reduction in ANC Systems”,2010 IEEE International Conference of Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, Mar. 14-19, 2010, pp. 349-352, Dallas, TX, US. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/228,322, filed Mar. 28, 2014, Alderson, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/762,504, filed Feb. 8, 2013, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/721,832, filed Dec. 20, 2012, Lu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/724,656, filed Dec. 21, 2012, Lu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/252,235, filed Apr. 14, 2014, Lu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,013, filed Aug. 15, 2013, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/924,935, filed Jun. 24, 2013, Hellman. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/896,526, filed May 17, 2013, Naderi. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/101,955, filed Dec. 10, 2013, Alderson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/101,777, filed Dec. 10, 2013, Alderson, et al. |
Cohen, Israel, “Noise Spectrum Estimation in Adverse Environments: Improved Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Sep. 2003, pp. 1-11, vol. 11, Issue 5, Piscataway, NJ, US. |
Ryan, et al., “Optimum Near-Field Performance of Microphone Arrays Subject to a Far-Field Beampattern Constraint”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Nov. 2000, pp. 2248-2255, 108 (5), Pt. 1, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. |
Cohen, et al., “Noise Estimation by Minima Controlled Recursive Averaging for Robust Speech Enhancement”, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Jan. 2002, pp. 12-15, vol. 9, No. 1, Piscataway, NJ, US. |
Martin, Rainer, “Noise Power Spectral Density Estimation Based on Optimal Smoothing and Minimum Statistics”, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing, Jul. 2001, pp. 504-512, vol. 9, No. 5, Piscataway, NJ, US. |
Martin, Rainer, “Spectral Subtraction Based on Minimum Statistics”, Signal Processing VII Theories and Applications, Proceedings of EUSIPCO-94, 7th European Signal Processing Conference, Sep. 13-16, 1994, pp. 1182-1185, vol. III, Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K. |
Booij, et al., “Virtual sensors for local, three dimensional, broadband multiple-channel active noise control and the effects on the quiet zones”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise and Vibration Engineering, ISMA 2010, Sep. 20-22, 2010, pp. 151-166, Leuven. |
Kuo, et al., “Residual noise shaping technique for active noise control systems”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95 (3), Mar. 1994, pp. 1665-1668. |
Lopez-Caudana, Edgar Omar, “Active Noise Cancellation: The Unwanted Signal and the Hybrid Solution”, Adaptive Filtering Applications, Dr. Lino Garcia (Ed.), Jul. 2011, pp. 49-84, ISBN: 978-953-307-306-4, InTech. |
Senderowicz, et al., “Low-Voltage Double-Sampled Delta-Sigma Converters”, IEEE Journal on Solid-State Circuits, Dec. 1997, pp. 1907-1919, vol. 32, No. 12, Piscataway, NJ. |
Hurst, et al., “An improved double sampling scheme for switched-capacitor delta-sigma modulators”, 1992 IEEE Int. Symp. On Circuits and Systems, May 10-13, 1992, vol. 3, pp. 1179-1182, San Diego, CA. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/686,353, filed Nov. 27, 2012, Hendrix, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/795,160, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Hendrix, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/692,367, filed Dec. 3, 2012, Alderson, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/722,119, filed Dec. 20, 2012, Hendrix, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/727,718, filed Dec. 27, 2012, Alderson, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/784,018, filed Mar. 4, 2013, Alderson, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/787,906, filed Mar. 7, 2013, Alderson, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,141, filed Dec. 28, 2012, Zhou, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,931, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Lu, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/794,979, filed Mar. 12, 2013, Alderson, et al. |
Toochinda, et al. “A Single-Input Two-Output Feedback Formulation for ANC Problems,” Proceedings of the 2001 American Control Conference, Jun. 2001, pp. 923-928, vol. 2, Arlington, VA. |
Johns, et al., “Continuous-Time LMS Adaptive Recursive Filters,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, Jul. 1991, pp. 769-778, vol. 38, No. 7, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ. |
Shoval, et al., “Comparison of DC Offset Effects in Four LMS Adaptive Algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Processing, Mar. 1995, pp. 176-185, vol. 42, Issue 3, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ. |
Mali, Dilip, “Comparison of DC Offset Effects on LMS Algorithm and its Derivatives,” International Journal of Recent Trends in Engineering, May 2009, pp. 323-328, vol. 1, No. 1, Academy Publisher. |
Silva, et al., “Convex Combination of Adaptive Filters With Different Tracking Capabilities,” IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Apr. 15-20, 2007, pp. III 925-928, vol. 3, Honolulu, HI, USA. |
Akhtar, et al., “A Method for Online Secondary Path Modeling in Active Noise Control Systems,” IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, May 23-26, 2005, pp. 264-267, vol. 1, Kobe, Japan. |
Davari, et al., “A New Online Secondary Path Modeling Method for Feedforward Active Noise Control Systems,” IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Apr. 21-24, 2008, pp. 1-6, Chengdu, China. |
Lan, et al., “An Active Noise Control System Using Online Secondary Path Modeling With Reduced Auxiliary Noise,” IEEE Signal Processing Letters, Jan. 2002, pp. 16-18, vol. 9, Issue 1, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ. |
Liu, et al., “Analysis of Online Secondary Path Modeling With Auxiliary Noise Scaled by Residual Noise Signal,” IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech and Language Processing, Nov. 2010, pp. 1978-1993, vol. 18, Issue 8, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ. |
Black, John W., “An Application of Side-Tone in Subjective Tests of Microphones and Headsets”, Project Report No. NM 001 064.01.20, Research Report of the U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Feb. 1, 1954, 12 pages (pp. 1-12 in pdf), Pensacola, FL, US. |
Peters, Robert W., “The Effect of High-Pass and Low-Pass Filtering of Side-Tone Upon Speaker Intelligibility”, Project Report No. NM 001 064.01.25, Research Report of the U.S. Naval School of Aviation Medicine, Aug. 16, 1954, 13 pages (pp. 1-13 in pdf), Pensacola, FL, US. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/197,814, filed Mar. 5, 2014, Kaller, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,537, filed Mar. 14, 2014, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 14/210,589, filed Mar. 14, 2014, Abdollahzadeh Milani, et al. |
Lane, et al., “Voice Level: Autophonic Scale, Perceived Loudness, and the Effects of Sidetone”, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Feb. 1961, pp. 160-167, vol. 33, No. 2., Cambridge, MA, US. |
Liu, et al., “Compensatory Responses to Loudness-Shifted Voice Feedback During Production of Mandarin Speech”, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Oct. 2007, pp. 2405-2412, vol. 122, No. 4. |
Paepcke, et al., “Yelling in the Hall: Using Sidetone to Address a Problem With Mobile Remote Presence Systems”, Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Oct. 16-19, 2011, 10 pages (pp. 1-10 in pdf), Santa Barbara, CA, US. |
Therrien, et al., “Sensory Attenuation of Self-Produced Feedback: The Lombard Effect Revisited”, PLOS ONE, Nov. 2012, pp. 1-7, vol. 7, Issue 11, e49370, Ontario, Canada. |
U.S. Appl. No. 13/968,007, filed Aug. 15, 2013, Hendrix, et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120308021 A1 | Dec 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61493162 | Jun 2011 | US |