1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to loudspeakers and more particularly to a loudspeaker surround design that maximizes the cone diameter without the necessity of changing the outer dimensions of the loudspeaker frame.
2. Related Art
The general construction of a loudspeaker drive consists of a diaphragm, voice coil, magnetic motor, frame and suspension system. The magnetic motor is generally attached to the frame. The voice coil and diaphragm are then mounted to the frame via the suspension system, which may include one or more suspension members. The voice coil of the driver typically consists of a voice coil former having a wire wound about the lower portion of the voice coil former. Often times, although not necessary, the voice coil former is encased in a wrapper. The suspension system of the driver.
Prior Art
Prior Art
Prior Art
Because of the need to provide adequate area to secure the diaphragm to the frame, as illustrated in prior art
The area of a diaphragm is a major contributing factor to a loudspeaker's efficiency because as the size of a diaphragm of a loudspeaker becomes smaller, achieving acceptable low frequency response becomes more difficult. To achieve lower frequency responses, a loudspeaker is required to displace larger volumes of air, and the suspension stiffness must be reduced to maintain a low resonance corresponding to the lighter mass of the smaller driver. The volume of air that a loudspeaker can displace is dependent upon the area of the diaphragm and the range of motion allowed by the suspension, i.e., amount of vibrational excursion, or volume displacement, of the loudspeaker.
Large quantities of small-sized loudspeakers are used in vehicles such as cars, trucks, boats, aircraft, and etc. Loudspeaker for use in vehicles are generally designed to mechanically fit a particular mounting pattern used by vehicle manufacturers, which typically include a main cutout and surrounding mounting holes, dimensioned according to standards originating from different world regions. Original, as well as, replacement speakers are generally required to fit the mounting pattern and space originally provided in the vehicle. As such, the outer dimensions of the frame of the loudspeaker generally must meet these predefined dimensions.
Because the size of the loudspeaker for use in vehicles is predefined, the area of the diaphragm of each loudspeaker is also thereby limited. While it would be very simple to increase the efficiency by increasing the size of the speaker diameter, if the frame diameter or any of its critical dimensions were changed, the loudspeaker would cease to become a standard sized loudspeaker and its application would thereby be limited. Small-sized or compact loudspeakers for use in vehicles are typically categorized according to the dimensions of the loudspeaker frames and are commonly found in the following nominal sizes—4 inch, 5¼ inch and 6½ inches.
Round speakers having basket diameter in the 4″-7″ size range are manufactured in extremely high quantities for vehicular usage in the United State and throughout the world. Most of loudspeakers in the 6″-7″ range are made to either a JIS Japanese standard that specifies 6.8 inches (157 mm) diameter or a DIN German standard used in Europe that specifies 6.69 inches (170 mm) diameter.
With the typically surround mounting construction described above, the area of the diaphragm is generally less than that of the overall speaker size. Since the area of the diaphragm is a key factor in the efficiency of the loudspeaker, a useful factor of merit regarding size efficiency of a loudspeaker may be obtained by comparing the cone or diaphragm area to the total projected frame area. Table 1 below illustrates the diaphragm diameter, frame diameter, and the ratio between the diaphragm area and the frame area for typical loudspeaker sizes of the construction described above.
TABLE 1 shows that a conventional speaker structure typically provides a ratio of cone/basket area=0.51. The (b) version of the JIS type represents an effort to upgrade part way toward the DIN cone size and corresponding midrange and low frequency performance capability while retaining the smaller JIS basket size.
Practical all loudspeakers are subject to an inherent dropout of acoustic efficiency at a low-end cutoff frequency in inverse proportion to the diaphragm area (for a given cone excursion). Thus, for full range speakers of any size, it is very beneficial to increase the cone diameter. Each percent that the cone diameter can be increased yields more than double the percent increase in diaphragm area. Accomplishing increased diaphragm area without increasing the outer dimensions of the speaker frame, whether the frame and diaphragm are round, oval or other shape, is particularly beneficial to midrange and low frequency performance of compact speakers that are subject to strict constraints on frame size, such as those used in vehicular sound systems as well as in small personal radio/stereo players, multi-media computer systems, etc.
A need therefore exists for mounting for the surround to the frame of the loudspeaker in a manner that would enable the use of larger conventional diaphragm sizes in frames having strict size constraints and accordingly enhance the midrange and low frequency performance of the loudspeakers.
The invention is a surround that is generally arched in shape that includes a radial exterior flange, or outer attachment member, that extends downward from exterior side of the arched portion of the surround. This radial exterior flange departs from the conventional flange in that it extends generally directly downward, rather in outward, from the exterior side of the arched portion of the surround.
The mounting ring of the frame has a rim having interior and exterior walls, and a landing section. Traditionally, the radial exterior flange of the surround would adhesively attach to the landing section of the mounting ring. In the invention, the exterior flange of the surround interfaces with the interior wall of the rim of the mounting ring and its lower edge merely rests on the landing section of the mounting ring. The exterior flange is then adhesively attached to the interior wall of the rim of the mounting ring. With this configuration, a diaphragm of the loudspeaker may be larger in diameter than those diameters conventionally used for a corresponding speaker of same frame size because the surround attachment increases the radiated area of the speaker without changing the outer dimensions of the frame.
In alternative embodiments, the exterior flange remains configured as a downward extension of the exterior central arched portion of the surround and remains secured adjacent to the interior wall of the rim. However, rather than affix the exterior flange directly to the interior wall of the rim of the mounting ring of the frame, the exterior flange may be secured adjacent to the interior wall of the rim by a channel The channel may be either designed as part of the mounting ring of the frame or may be a separate piece that is affixed or adhered to the mounting ring of the frame.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The invention may be better understood with reference to the following figures. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention. In the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
Two suspension members 310 and 312 are utilized in the suspension system. A “spider” suspension 310 is connected to the voice coil 304 and extends from the voice coil 304 to the frame 308, connecting the voice coil 304 to the frame 308. A surround suspension member 312 is connected to the diaphragm 302 at its outer edge and extends outward from the diaphragm 302 to connect the diaphragm 302 to the frame 308. The suspension system of the driver acts to provide the stiffness of the driver and also provide air sealing for the driver. Although
The surround 312 has an arched or central portion 324 that is generally half-circular or arched in shape. Similar to the prior art surround 312, a radial planar interior flange 328 extends about the inner perimeter of the central arched portion 324 of the surround 312. This radial planar interior flange 328 is designed for the adhesive attachment of the interior flange 328 of the diaphragm 302.
A radial exterior flange 326, also known as an outer attach member or axial skirt, extends generally downward from the exterior side of the arched portion 324 of the surround 312. This radial exterior flange 326 departs from the conventional flange 114 (see prior art
Rather than attaching to the landing section 118 of the mounting ring 314 of the frame 108, the exterior flange 326 of the surround 312 is positioned adjacent to and interfaces with the inner wall 320 of the rim 316 of the mounting ring 314 of the frame 308. The lower edge of the exterior flange 326 rests on the landing section 318 of the mounting ring 314. Exterior flange 326 is then adhesively attached at the interfacing surfaces of the inner wall 320 of the mounting ring 314 of the frame 308.
Both the exterior 326 and interior flanges 328 of the surround 312 are typically attached to the frame 308 and diaphragm 302, respectively, with conventional adhesives. However, the attachment of the exterior flange 326 to the surround 312 can be accomplished by other fixed and removable mechanisms which are common within the industry, including but not limited to the use of adhesives.
The surround 312 can be constructed from several materials commonly known in the industry, including, but not limited to, rubber, compressed foam rubber, corrugated cloth, paper, plastic, treated fabrics or other similar material that functions to constrain the diaphragm 302 radially yet allows it to vibrate in an axial direction when driven by the voice coil 304. The frame 308 can be made from a pressed sheet metal, molded from plastic or cast metal such as aluminum, or other material known in the art for use with loudspeaker frames.
While the above described surround design 312 is illustrated in a loudspeaker 300 having a generally round frame 308 and diaphragm 302, the surround design 312 may be utilized for any shape speaker frame 308, e.g., round, oval, rectangular or otherwise, and can be used in connection with frames 308 made of various materials, such as stamped steel or cast speaker frames 308.
When used in connection with vehicles, the loudspeaker drivers 300 are generally mounted with baffles or other mounting mechanism within the predefined openings of the vehicles. As such, the speakers generally include mounting gaskets, mounting rings, and sometimes, frame extensions or adapters (not shown) to assist with mounting the loudspeakers. These additional mounting devices are separate mechanical elements from the frame 308 and should not be considered part of the frame 308 of the loudspeaker 300.
The exterior flange 326 is designed with a narrow fastening flange 712 extending outwardly from the edge of the exterior flange 326 and is fastened adhesively to the landing 318 of frame 308 and to a lower portion of the mounting adaptor 710. The mounting adaptor 710 may be molded from a plastic or formed or cast from a metal material, such as aluminum and be formed with a horizontal arm 714 that will interface with the rear speaker panel and facilitate the mounting of the speaker. The adapter is fastened adhesively to the inner wall 320 of the rim 316 of frame 308. The lower end of the vertical portion 716 of the adaptor 710 acts downwardly on the narrow fastening flange 712 to provide additional interfacing area for enhancing the adhesive fastening of the flange 712 to the landing 318 of the frame 308.
By way of example, in a 4″ round speaker with a conventional basket having 129 mm outer diameter, incorporation of most embodiments of the present invention will enable the conventional cone diameter (92 mm) to be increased to approximately 106 mm This is an increase in diaphragm of 11.5% in diameter and 24.4% in area, which provides significant improvement of low frequency response. Additionally, the diaphragm area/frame area accomplished by using the surround designs set forth above may be increased in the 4″ category to approximately 0.633, compared to 0.51 for conventional speakers, which is an increase of 24% of diaphragm area/frame area.
In any of the embodiments, the arched portion 324 of the surround 312 may be made uniform in thickness or specially varied in thickness for increased compliance, e.g. shaped to be thinner in a central region 324 and/or one or both flanges 326 and 328 may be tapered.
The above loudspeaker dimensions are given by way of example only. One skilled in the art will recognize that the above configuration can be incorporated into speaker systems of various sizes and shapes and is not limited to the dimension described above, but may vary based upon the desired application.
While various embodiments of the invention have been described, it will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible within the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/484,942, filed Jun. 15, 2009, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/610,383, filed Jun. 30, 2003, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/783,837, filed Jan. 19, 2001, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/176,734, filed Jan. 19, 2000, all applications of which are incorporated by reference in this application in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2439666 | Marquis | Apr 1948 | A |
2722991 | Carbonneau | Nov 1955 | A |
3095941 | Hassan | Jul 1963 | A |
3160716 | Luth | Dec 1964 | A |
4122314 | Matsuda et al. | Oct 1978 | A |
4235302 | Tsukamoto | Nov 1980 | A |
4590332 | Delbuck | May 1986 | A |
4748759 | Whiteing | Jun 1988 | A |
5148942 | Snook | Sep 1992 | A |
5687247 | Proni | Nov 1997 | A |
5748759 | Croft et al. | May 1998 | A |
5892185 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6176345 | Perkins et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6229902 | Proni | May 2001 | B1 |
6449375 | Hutt | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6567528 | Heed | May 2003 | B1 |
6607051 | Peng | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6665415 | Heed | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6782114 | Ando et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6959714 | Hakansson et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6996246 | Ito | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7031487 | Stiles | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7356157 | Proni | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7529380 | Ueda et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
20020051558 | Kuze et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2943054 | May 1981 | DE |
4896121 | Dec 1973 | JP |
59174795 | Nov 1984 | JP |
60000198 | Jan 1985 | JP |
9327088 | Dec 1997 | JP |
11164391 | Jun 1999 | JP |
02058433 | Jul 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
European Examination Report for corresponding European Application No. 10 012 998.0, mailed Jan. 8, 2013, 4 pages. |
Korean Office Action, translation only, for corresponding Application No. 10-2008-7020117, Nov. 14, 2008, 4 pages. |
Korean Final Office Action, translation only, for corresponding Application No. 10-2003-7009605, May 13, 2008, 5 pages. |
Japanese Office Action with translation for corresponding Application No. 2002-558780, Nov. 16, 2006, 4 pages. |
Japanese Final Office Action with translation for corresponding Application No. 2002-558780, Oct. 5, 2007, 4 pages. |
European Examination Report for corresponding Application No. 10 012 998.0, Dec. 19, 2011, 5 pages. |
European Extended Search Report for corresponding Application No. 10 012 998.0, Mar. 15, 2011, 6 pages. |
Chinese First Office Action with translation for corresponding Application No. 200810096075.9, Jan. 26, 2011, 13 pages. |
Chinese Third Office Action with translation for corresponding Application No. 200810096075.9, Mar. 31, 2012, 8 pages. |
Supplementary European Search Report for corresponding Application No. 02704186.2, Feb. 26, 2007, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120183171 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60176734 | Jan 2000 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10610383 | Jun 2003 | US |
Child | 12484942 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12484942 | Jun 2009 | US |
Child | 13346560 | US | |
Parent | 09783837 | Jan 2001 | US |
Child | 10610383 | US |