The present invention relates to speakers
Such a conventional speaker as discussed above is disclosed in, e.g. Unexamined Japanese Patent Publication No. 2004-7332 referred to as cited reference 1.
The foregoing conventional speaker, however, employs suspension holder 6A which firmly holds diaphragm 3A, so that the weight of the speaker excursion parts becomes heavy. The heavy weight does not matter to a woofer to which a large amount of output is applied, but it matters to a full-range and a mid-range speaker because the heavy excursion parts weight lowers the driving efficiency.
The present invention aims to provide a low-distortion speaker driven at higher efficiency. This speaker comprising the following elements in order to achieve the foregoing advantages:
The structure discussed above allows suppressing the distortion, and the lighter excursion parts weight of this structure invites an improvement in the driving efficiency.
The first exemplary embodiment is demonstrated hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Cone-shaped frame 5 includes magnetic circuit 1 at its bottom center, and magnetic circuit 1 is formed by combining and bonding disk-shaped magnet 1a, disk-shaped plate 1b, and cylindrical yoke 1c together. Inner wall of yoke 1c and outer wall of plate 1b form cylindrical magnetic gap 8 open upward with respect to magnetic circuit 1. Voice coil unit 2 is formed by winding coil 2b on cylindrical body 2a, and placed movably in the vertical direction along magnetic gap 8, thereby vibrating diaphragm 3 which shapes like a thin saucer and is coupled to the upper section of the outer wall of voice coil unit 2. Dust cap 9 is provided to the upper end of voice coil unit 2 in order to prevent dust from entering into the speaker.
Diaphragm 3 produces the sound of the speaker, so that it is made mainly from pulp and resin, both of which materials allow balancing high rigidity with internal loss. The outer rim of diaphragm 3 is coupled to an end of the opening of frame 5 via first edge 4 upwardly projected, and the inner rim thereof is fixed to voice coil unit 2. First edge 4 is made of urethane, expanded rubber, SBR rubber, or fabric so that it cannot apply moving load to diaphragm 3.
An application of an audio signal to coil 2b of voice coil unit 2 prompts voice coil unit 2 to move up and down because voice coil unit 2 reacts to the magnetic field of magnetic gap 8. This movement vibrates diaphragm 3 for the speaker to produce the sound. Placement of second edge 11, in particular, at the outer rim of damper 10 allows suppressing the distortion of the speaker, and on top of that, it improves the driving efficiency of the speaker.
Damper 10 is originally supposed to be coupled between frame 5 and voice coil unit 2 at its inner rim and outer rim, so that it suppresses the rolling of voice coil unit 2 in moving. Damper 10 forms corrugation and has elasticity in order to easily follow the movement of voice coil unit 2. This corrugation shape allows applying moderate load to voice coil unit 2 in vibrating at small amplitude; however, the load increases at the greater amplitude of voice coil unit 2.
In this first embodiment, the outer rim of damper 10 is thus coupled to frame 5 via second edge 11. This structure allows voice coil unit 2 to move in a wider range, and when damper 10 becomes some load to voice coil unit 2, second edge 11 receives stress and then elastically deforms in response to the stress. When voice coil unit 2 moves in greater amplitude, damper 10 thus hardly interferes with this amplitude, so that the lowering of the driving efficiency can be suppressed.
In this embodiment, voice coil unit 2 is suspended along the vertical direction by two suspensions, namely, first edge 4 and a combination of damper 10 and second edge 11, and yet, first edge 4 is thinned to make itself lighter in order to increase the driving efficiency of diaphragm 3. The excursion parts weights of a combination of damper 10 and second edge 11, diaphragm 3 and first edge 4 are thus reduced.
A thinner first edge 4 will weaken the suspending strength to voice coil unit 2, so that second edge 11 employs a thicker edge to prevent voice coil unit 2 from being suspended with weaker strength. As a result, combination 12 formed of damper 10 and second edge 11 has a greater elasticity modulus (more rigid) than that of first edge 4.
The structure discussed above allows voice coil unit 2 to be suspended mainly by combination 12 of damper 10 and second edge 11, so that downward load and upward load of combination 12 are desirably as equal as possible in order to suppress the distortion in vertical movement of diaphragm 3.
This first embodiment thus employs the following structure: second edge 11 includes first protrusion 11a protruding toward diaphragm 3 and second protrusion 11b protruding oppositely to first protrusion 11a. To be more specific, damper 10 forms a corrugated ring-shape and is generally symmetric with respect to a horizontal axis in
To make the upward stiffness as equal as possible to the downward stiffness of combination 12 formed of damper 10 and second edge 11, it is necessary to make the upward stiffness as equal as possible to the downward stiffness of second edge 11.
This first embodiment thus employs the following structure as discussed above: Second edge 11 includes first protrusion 11a protruding toward diaphragm 3 and second protrusion 11b protruding oppositely to protrusion 11a. This structure allows the upward stiffness of combination 12 to be as equal as possible to the downward stiffness of combination 12. To be more specific, first protrusion 11a and second protrusion 11b protrude oppositely to each other so that upward excursion load hardly differs from downward excursion load.
As a result, the upward and downward excursion of diaphragm 3 becomes symmetrical, thereby reducing the distortion of the speaker, and yet, excursion parts become light-weighted, so that the speaker can work as a full-range or a mid-range speaker with high driving efficiency.
The foregoing structure, i.e. damper 10 is coupled to frame 5 via second edge 11, allows maintaining the linearity of power linearity due to the corrugated damper 10 until the movable range of voice coil unit 2 becomes somewhat large enough. When the movable range becomes greater than a given one and it becomes difficult to maintain the linearity, the elasticity of second edge 11 compensates the linearity, thus the elastic modulus of second edge 11 is desirably set greater (more rigid) than that of damper 10.
Damper 10 preferably has an elastic modulus different from that of second edge 11, and these two elements desirably work independently of each other in response to the movable range of voice coil unit 2. Between damper 10 and second edge 11, to be more specific, at the joint of damper 10 and second edge 11, an elastic modulus is set greater (more rigid) than those of damper 10 and second edge 11, thereby maintaining the independency of both the elements.
A greater elastic modulus (more rigid) at the joint of damper 10 and second edge 11 can be set this way for instance: second edge 11 and damper 10 are bonded together with hard adhesive such as acrylic-based adhesive, or second edge 11 and damper 10 are integrated by insert molding and then the joint is thickened, or reinforcing member is bonded to the joint.
The second embodiment is demonstrated hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings. The second embodiment is similar to the first one in many points, so that the descriptions of similar points are omitted, and only different points are described hereinafter.
To be more specific, in the first embodiment shown in
The foregoing structure also allows making the upward stiffness to be as equal as possible to the downward stiffness of combination 12a formed of damper 10 and second edge 11c, so that upward excursion load hardly differs from downward excursion load.
The present invention can reduce the distortion of speaker, and improves the driving efficiency thereof as well, so that the present invention is useful particularly for full-range and mid-range speakers.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2005-352998 | Dec 2005 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2006/323898 | 11/30/2006 | WO | 00 | 4/27/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2007/066561 | 6/14/2007 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6236733 | Kato et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6655495 | Kuze et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6735323 | Chang | May 2004 | B1 |
20030079936 | Kuze et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
50-18231 | Feb 1975 | JP |
56-049188 | Nov 1981 | JP |
62-109598 | Jul 1987 | JP |
2-133097 | Nov 1990 | JP |
2003-199192 | Jul 2003 | JP |
2003-199192 | Jul 2003 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090080685 A1 | Mar 2009 | US |